Watch: Park Ranger Witnesses Bigfoot Burial [Real Bigfoot Encounters]


This report comes from the High Sierra in California. A forest ranger witnesses a "Bigfoot burial" after a camp was ransacked by a clan of Bigfoots.



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. DAMN, BANDINI!! YOU DIDN'T WASTE ANY TIME!!

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    2. Nice first Harry.

      How fascinating was that burial xx

      Delete
    3. MMG posted this yesterday, it's a BBC 4 Radio programme called 'Bigfoot: Not a Bear';

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03y0qkl

      ... Great listen!!

      Delete
    4. EVA!!!!!!! HELLO, MY FRIEND!!

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    5. Cheers Joe.

      The BBC Nature show has a high level of gravitas associated with it.

      BBC Radio 4 is as serious as they come. No Ch 4 hokum here!

      MMG

      Delete
    6. Ha ha ha!! Not the first time you've posted stuff this good MMG! Thanks buddy!!

      Delete
    7. And still not a single shred of decent evidence, making the both of you look completely ridiculous. I suggest a mental health professional.

      Delete
    8. Hmmmmm, what's this all about then?

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/could-this-be-bigfoot-skull-mk-davis-is.html?m=0

      http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/109783839

      ... We'll soon see the mental health issue with the next excuse...

      Delete
    9. .. Also, 'decent evidence' would account for an accumilation like tracks & dermals, hair, scat, footage, archeological & anthropologocal studies, verified and published audio recordings with language, unknown primate DNA, ten thousand years of native culture, tens of thousands of eyewitnesses many of whom are mutiple person...

      'Decent' enough for you?

      Delete
    10. Please 3 28. Give us the name of the mental health professional you are visiting. Will want to steer clear of yours as it is not working for you.
      Chuck

      Delete
    11. Seriously folks. Most people outgrow this nonsense by their early teens. And I hear there is a Dr. Matthew Johnson that specializes in disorders of this type. Or perhaps he suffers from them? Whatever.

      Delete
    12. Yet you're here as well... Tut, tut...

      Delete
    13. Harry, if you start now you can get drunk twice today. Sunday twofers rock!

      Delete
  2. I gave a listen to the BBC MMG posted. What a novel idea. A Brit that goes out into the field to investigate and meet with individuals involved with this endeavor. Far cry from the American way of sending a reporter out for a one minute or two minute clip that is then talked about on the nightly news by the desk anchors who turn everything around into snide, snarky and giggle factor, often exposing themselves for the complete baffons they are.

    Two thumbs up to the BBC for this one.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  3. I see this is where all the cool kids hang out! Nice first HB!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Replies
    1. Brookreson!!

      I told Harry earlier I wasn't gonna drink... But the Heinekens in the shop looked too tempting to decline!!

      Delete
    2. Where's the amazing footage? It's been like 6 months.

      Delete
    3. If it was all up in your ass you'd know where it was.

      Delete
    4. Ha ha!!

      6:32... You got nailed yesterday about this, now run along!

      Delete
    5. Joe. Heineken is so good. Just like last nights Amstel. Hey Eva. Hello dear sweet Anon.

      Delete
    6. Texans appear to have a wonderful understanding of European beer... Not that I'm 'European'.

      Amstel is very good.

      Delete
    7. Joe Texas is the place to be.
      We have it all here.
      The beach,woods,swamps and the beautiful Hill Country.
      Mike B knows all about it.
      I'm out of here.
      Going to have brunch with the family.
      Y'all have a wonderful Sunday.
      Mike H.

      Delete
    8. Yep, everything is bigger in Texas, including the amount of nothing and liking it.

      With love,
      YGNALI

      Delete
    9. Please release the footage, Mike B!

      Delete
    10. Mike B.- what kind of lens cap is that?

      Delete
    11. ask your momma she'll tell you

      Delete
    12. na yours tells it better

      Delete
    13. that's not what your sister said

      Delete
  6. The bigfoot costume at 1:38 looks better than the Patty costume in the Patterson footage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, the Patty suit looks like shit. I can't believe that so many people fell for that. I guess people see what they want to see.

      Delete
    2. ... What? Like imaginary zippers and stuff?!

      ; )

      Delete
    3. I agree with 5:29. You can see the hood line where the costume headpiece is pulled over the head. Also, that static bubble butt is hilarious.

      Delete
    4. Not to mention that Patterson was a first class con man.

      Delete
    5. Nobody can see hoodlines except those as hypocritically delusional as their accusations.

      Roger Patterson was a researcher... Not a con man, that's unless you believe a real con man like Long.

      Oh, and here's your 'diaper butt';

      http://youtu.be/wQr922oWdgY

      Peace.

      Delete
    6. LOL. Roger was a first class con. He's been dead for over 40 years, and he's still fooling people like Joe.

      Delete
    7. I just jumped in here. I was on Youtube a few minutes ago watching the Patterson footage. If you look slightly below shoulder height, you can definitely see what looks like a hood line for a costume. It runs horizontally right across the back. It's a costume.

      Delete
    8. 5:51... Says who? Someone, who post publishing of his book, his interviewees came forward to day he fabricated stuff they said? Think about that when you're applying your version of skepticism.

      5:56... No hoodline, it's in your mind. Don't you think your heroes would have come forward sooner with sucks a claim? The digitalized screen shot close up of Patty looking back at the camera should be enough to dismiss any claims of a mask... The wide mouth being just one element that ignites the fear of god in you.

      If it's a mere suit, it would have been replicated.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. I agree with Joe. For so many people, including people with PhDs, to be fooled for so many years, it obviously has to be an extremely good looking hoax if it is a hoax.

      Delete
    11. If it's a hoax... Then it's trumped 47 years of technological advances and special effects, in a time where a very few materials circulating today were even available, in a time where most people hadn't even seen photographs of gorillas... By a broke cowboy.

      Delete
    12. Then bigfoot is a slow, diurnal primate that will walk slowly away in the direct line of sight of men on horseback with cameras and guns. Huh. I wonder why nobody has seen one since? Explain this please.

      Delete
    13. (Sigh)

      If you know anything about the footage, you'll know that Roger and Bob lost the creature after a few hundred yards... How? She acts exactly like a human would do with a gun pointed at her (two 'guns' considering the camera and her primitive understanding of technology)... So as not to cause any knee jerk reactions. There are COUNTLESS reports of Sasquatch doing the exact same thing as Patty does, just as much as there are of amazing stealth being displayed.

      Delete
    14. And still we wait for a real bigfoot..... No such things, Joe.

      Delete
    15. so says the guy on a bigfoot blog^

      Delete
    16. They are seen walking away slowly or at an easy gait all the time and have been described as such. Sometimes they blast out of Dodge. Sometimes they mossy on out. That creature is hardly walking slow. It is just such a natural fluid pace ( more akin to cross country skiing ) it may seem to be slow. Truth is they are far more athletic than humans and need to be for the terrain in which they live. I believe it is covering far more ground than any man could. I wonder if anyone has done an estimate of the yardage covered in that 30 seconds, and if they did in my opinion they would prove it. In three weeks I will try and ask Bob Gimlin how much distance he estimates it covered and I will do the math. Once a normal man hits around 5 mph he is no longer walking but in a jog mode. Test this out on a treadmill and see.

      Chuck

      Delete
    17. I think that a creature that would have evolved instincts to stay out of our way and who has also monitored us as a species from a far (possibly seeing hunters in action); it would have had an idea what we are capable of and it would have rendered it as successful as it has been in evading us, and that would mean it would without a doubt react the same way as Patty did. Remember, these two cowboys had physically threatening gestures and caught her unexpectedly in the creek bed... Out in the open is not a natural habitat for her and therefore very surprised and therefore rendering her to not behave as usual as she is out of her comfort zone?

      Some enthusiasts would argue, that regardless of this creature being used to it's usual apex competitors in the wilderness, that this creature could even have seen humans for the first time; rendering it extremely confused, and with the intelligence of that of human; would explain the way it tries to leave the situation the way it does.

      There are innumerable accounts of these creatures defying their size to achieve levels of stealth that in many enthusiast's opinions, renders them to assume these creatures are paranormal... Now I am not suggesting that, but using it to explain why people are left dumbfounded at the gate, size - stealth capabilities... You have to remember, that after so many hundred feet, Roger and Bob couldn't track her anymore; where did she go? Did she use her stealth at this point where she knew there was definitely no chance of being tracked anymore, doubling back once these were lead out of her route to safety? Assumptions yes, but possibilities in line with them not being able to track her anymore.

      6:50... In the said footage is your real Bigfoot... A proverbial cog in the necessary accumilation of all sources of evidence.

      All... I'm going down the pub to watch the Liverpool v West Ham game... Come on the reds!!!

      Delete
    18. blah blah blah. you can't get a piucture of this giant mammal that exists across the continent that has evolved to walk slowly away? You are a complete drooling idiot.

      Delete
    19. People have pretended that it's so real for so long that they have invented an entire lifestyle for it. It's great fiction writing.

      Delete
    20. 7:05... 7:05...

      Got monkey suit?

      ; )

      Laters y'all!

      (In my best American accent!!)

      Delete
    21. Dmaker schooled you on negative evidence, you were just too stupid to understand.

      You still don't get it.

      Do we have to bring him back for another clinic on making you look like an idiot, Joe?

      Delete
    22. ^You need to calm the hell down dude.

      Delete
    23. There is a fine line between sanity, and insanity.

      Sane people who do not believe in something, do not waste their lives by repeatedly posting on message boards about something not being real. These people would only exhibit this behavior, if they were paid to be there.

      Therefore, all the negative posters on this board, are either completely insane OR they are paid to be here. Both of which does not speak well for their credibiility. Therefore, all negative posters can simply be ignored as if they do not exist. Which will be troubling for them, but they are just going to have to deal with it or get lost.

      Delete
    24. Who would pay them? I think they are just frickin crazy. Fixated on making trouble and discord. Inflating their own egos with a false sense of importance. Spills out in all areas of their lives. Aggressive, arrogant, lonely bullies. You are spot on, they should be ignored completely.

      Delete
    25. Dmaker totally destroys Joe every time he comments here.

      Delete
    26. That's why we come here. Always entertaining to see a delusional, arrogant individual like PJ shot down in flames.

      Delete
    27. WTF is a dmaker anyway no how?

      Delete
    28. dmaker stands for dump maker

      Delete
    29. And I thought the troll was dead.

      For the record skeptard poster boy dmaker has never smoked anyone.

      Not here, nor on the BFF.

      DWA is the ultimate BF skeptic!

      MMG

      Delete
    30. You cannot prove or disprove the legitimacy of research without testing the said sources, and every field of study as a starting point. Evidence doesn't 'stop existing' because you have a preconceived default position, that's as anti-scientific as you can get, not true skepticism and in fact suppression of evidence (not to mention denial).

      Dmaker suggesting that the requirement of footage presented with scientists is to be tested is negative is actually suppressing evidence.

      That is all!

      Delete
  7. When I was young,I was stupid.Now that I'm older,I'm still stupid.Who'd a thunk that.

    D.Campbell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My favorite updates posted to this blog!

      Who needs Bigfoot updates when we have Campz updates instead!!!!!

      Delete
    2. What the hell were you thinking on Ball Day D.C?

      Delete
    3. WHY IS DAN'S NAME NOT WHITED OUT?????????

      Delete
  8. Who actually believes this BS story? It's ready-made for this blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so says the guy on a bigfoot blog^

      Delete
    2. Of course! It's thrilling to point out how stupid people are. And wait for their conniption fit, for it surely comes. Like clockwork. Lots of people point out how dumb bigfoot believers are and why. But the believers are part of the cult.

      Delete
    3. As stupid as someone trying to claw back the same reassurance as one needed when one was a child from the boogey man?

      Like a book.

      Delete
    4. A bogeyman from childhood--perfect analogy. Grow up.

      Delete
    5. I am still sans pants.

      MMG

      Delete
    6. Speaking of cults, 7:02, what's on the JREF agenda today? Was there the Randi Prayer Breakfast, followed by a gigantic skeptard hymn singalong?

      It's thrilling to point out how stupid people are? Does self-revelation count? If so, you must be highly thrilled by what your comment reveals about you to the rest of the readers here.

      Delete
  9. This is the real deal folks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Park ranger witnesses bigfoot burial is plain B.S.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I do not care if Patty is fake.
    I do not care that the field is overflowing with idiots. (if the shoe fits.)
    I do not care that the burial sounds made up from the get go.
    I spied the big man once.
    Once is enough.

    ReplyDelete
  12. this dumbass could have the easiet bigfoot body find and could have ended everything by digging up that body for science.. if true... other than that.. this is just a STORY... yet again. fail

    ReplyDelete
  13. this dumbass could have the easiet bigfoot body find and could have ended everything by digging up that body for science.. if true... other than that.. this is just a STORY... yet again. fail

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. double posting equals FAIL

      Delete
    2. Correction. Double posts= double fail.

      Or a 3 o'd loooser from a Jrefers nether region

      Jar it up

      Delete
  14. sounds like a story of story told by a friend of a friend who knows somebody who heard the story,

    ReplyDelete
  15. many obliterated footers on here today

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anyone else wish we could vote Henry May off of MNBRT?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Most forest rangers have a science background. If this story were true, why didn't he mark the gps where the burial took place and go back there with a team of scientists to investigate and dig up the find of the century?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Easy. Because then the would have to produce it. Personally, I think the story was made up about an hour before air time. It's easy to make shit up when there is no way to confirm the validity of a claim. I used to bang Taylor Swift and Katy Perry. At the same time. Now, prove I didn't.

      Delete
  18. Does anyone know if Rev. Jeff provides info on where he gets the stories in his "Real Bigfoot Encounters"? He otherwise seems to have a genuine interest and education in the subject but he doesn't provide any details to corroborate that these stories come from actual individuals, anonymous or not. Is it just for entertainment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question...

      Anyone? test 1...2...3....check...check...test 1.2.3.

      Silence is deafening.

      Delete
    2. Of course he doesn't provide details. That would lead to things like fact checking. And we know where that would lead. Boring radio. Kinda like when Ghost Hunters got busted faking stuff. After that, all their " evidence" was reduced to barely audible static and crap that allways seems to happen BEHIND the camera man. Coincidence I'm sure.

      Delete
  19. Shawn once again recycling an old story, this one from last April. BE used to be interesting, now it's just dumb. A handful of posters saying the same dull things over, and over, and over. Stories that are ridiculous (Bigfoot in central Michigan? Sure.)

    ReplyDelete
  20. I can't give you my real name either, just call me Teddy
    so park ranger smith sees a bigfoot being buried but doesn't think to remember where the site was to come back and unearth the creature ?
    C'mon, what could be the greatest discovery in modern day science and he just lets it go ? Complete and utter rot I say !

    ReplyDelete
  21. YEAH RIGHT!!....So this guy sees them burying a BF and doesn't go back later with some backup to dig up the body and prove they exist??? WTF EVER.... That's the 1st thing any normal person would do... Who IS this park ranger? If anyone knows please email me his info because I'll go there my damn self and dig it up..... flerectors@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  22. YEAH RIGHT!!....So this guy sees them burying a BF and doesn't go back later with some backup to dig up the body and prove they exist??? WTF EVER.... That's the 1st thing any normal person would do... Who IS this park ranger? If anyone knows please email me his info because I'll go there my damn self and dig it up..... flerectors@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  23. When messing with Sasquatch goes wrong!!! Bet that commercial didn't make it to the airways and a dead person in a Bigfoot suit is buried somewhere out in the woods

    ReplyDelete
  24. Expedition Unknown for sure

    ReplyDelete
  25. GRAYs all abouts for sure - controlling bigfoots and they been collecting DNA for years and making clones and hybrids

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bigfoot Forums home of ALL the cowards and liars who like to spend their time here where they don't even have to play by their own stupid rules.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?