Bigfoot Encounter on the River in North Carolina [Real Bigfoot Encounters]


This week encounter comes from the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina near the Kentucky border. A man and his neighbor discover a site they can never reveal the location to. Let's hear their story.



Comments

  1. Bow to me! For I am first! Silence fools! Muhaahahaahaha!!! Muhaaa ha ahhh ahh.........huh......cough cough. Huahaa!

    ReplyDelete
  2. So, you do know North Carolina is not a border state with Kentucky? Virginia, South Carolina, Tennessee, and even a tiny sliver of Georgia are all border states with North Carolina...

    And you call yourself an American. You should be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GOOD CALL!! Why do they waste our time with this crap? Bigfoot Encounters seems to assume we're all idiots;he certainly is for showing this nonsense

      Delete
    2. Laos aint got google maps.

      Delete
    3. I'm not surprised, you seem like the type that gets entertained with automatic urinals and will stand there telling every guy that walks in how the urinals are magic.

      Delete
    4. Nothing magical about your urinal of a brain.

      Delete
  3. FOR SHAME! Good morning BA BA BA DA BA BA

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Joe you do know evolution is a fact right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Along with the possibility of tampering with DNA along the way; yes.

      Delete
    2. Why do you have an issue with science then? If science says no evidence of bigfoot then why think otherwise?

      Delete
    3. Because science has come to that conclusion off the back of being selective facts and is mere heuristics.

      I have no issue with science, just science that isn't practiced properly.

      Delete
    4. Where is it practiced poorly exactly?

      Delete
    5. ... For example; because we have an example of one source of evidence being falsified, this is discarded as legitimate. This does not account for that fact that all sources of evidence can be falsified and in the process it ignores even a series of reputable scientists happy to have their names to such sources, in favor of a more easily attainable conclusion.

      Delete
    6. If evolution is real...what will a Giraffe look like some day?

      Variation amongst species is NOT evolution. People often confuse such matters. (A bigfoot) is a variation of a species. It is not something that "evolved". Stand back - take a breath...and think about things for a minute logically in your own mind. (not the institutional junk crammed down our throats in high school, college and media).

      Delete
    7. The woman of the Maasai tribe in Africa use "necklaces" to stretch their necks during their lives. How many generations (hundreds? or maybe thousands?) will there be before the children are born with elongated necks?

      The answer is none. The children will always look like their parents. Regular "normal" sized necks.

      Delete
    8. ... And this is why I don't buy into 'head binding' with the elongated skulls... More reason not to since the Paracas skulls have been preliminary sequenced for DNA.

      Delete
    9. There is an interesting fish called an "Angler fish". It uses a "fleshy protuberance" to "lure" fish in and then it pounces. It snaps them up and eats them.

      How exactly did this lure "evolve". Did the fishes great great grandparents think it would be a cool way to catch fish and grow it? (knowing full well it would take a million years or so to actually be a fully functioning lure of course). I wonder how they did that? Amazing.

      I mean, it would just be a miniscule tiny "stump" for thousands of years as it "evolved" into a fully functioning lure. They must have had some generations that went very hungry along the way :)

      Evolution or not. My point (to the above topic posted) is that I think we most all agree that Bigfoot (if it exists) is a fascinating creature that would truly be a link between "us" and a "prehistoric" race of people.

      Delete
    10. Denying evolution is like denying gravity.

      How about you jump off a cliff? You'll be fine right?

      Delete
    11. 4:21

      Not the best analogy. I used to believe in evolution as well. That's what I was taught/told from the time I was little all the way through college. However, as time has gone on - I've 're-evaluated' things. Starting from this:
      "the THEORY of evolution. It is (a'hem) WAS a theory once upon a time.

      Anyway - this isn't a blog for debating evolution vs. creation but this bit started off with someone asking Joe if he know evolution was fact. I felt compelled to chime in.

      Whoever you are - do YOU know that evolution is "fact"? Or is it just something that you have been taught and have accepted. :)

      Delete
    12. 5:00 What's crazy about it?

      Delete
    13. Is this the real joe fits ? Ttl

      Delete
    14. Yes.. I'm verified, as you can see!

      Peace.

      Delete
    15. Evolution is a fact as much as gravity is is fact. They are both observable and repeatable. In fact all of modern day genetics and medicine relies on evolution.

      The point being made was to put these "science" deniers in their place. Many of whom happen to be footers.

      Delete
    16. My Grandmother said that Sir Isaac Newton was an ancestor of ours :) Ha...

      Anyway - Evolution is "observable" and "repeatable". Huh?!? You need to really think about that.

      I don't deny "science" at all - however, don't fall for every hook, line and fleshy protuberance that is out there (especially to fit an argument).

      Delete
    17. Pretty much all displines of science converge to show evolution is true. Without it the whole scientific model falls apart. None of it works.

      You are having trouble understanding evolution but that doesn't mean it isn't true. I suggest reading up on the subject its fascinating stuff.

      Delete
    18. Old settlers diaries spoke of a fleshy protuberance.

      Delete
    19. Joe is getting destroyed like normal today. He just never learns that even though he is a troll himself, his charades are as transparent as the mumu Chick wears to bed. The Joe account holder likes to play the role of dopey bigfoot enthusiast who is an easy target for trolls. Yet its all a design to get blog hits. Joe is king troll

      Delete
    20. Didn't you promise to go seat after I answered your questions?

      "Coo-coo!!"

      Delete
    21. Elongated necks weren't the result of genetic variation, so it's not a trait that can be passed on.
      Life evolves, it has been demonstrated and is repeatable, and can be assumed as fact.
      That being said evolution still does not adequately explain all life on this planet.
      Ancient fraking aliens.

      Delete
    22. Give me one example of an animal that has "evolved".

      Demonstrated and repeatable...(and oh...I only have about 30 or 40 years left before I croak...not millions).

      Delete
    23. I'm waiting?

      Tell me what it looked like a million years ago. And tell me what it looks like today. Please.

      Delete
  5. Joe got smoked in the Kryder post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Location.

      Must have hurt to have an essay countered with one word answer.

      Delete
    2. I missed that post but I can imagine he did like in most posts.

      Until joe can produce an actual bigfoot every single word he types is worthless.

      Delete
    3. It's pretty simple; the angry little gentleman, in all his shouting and name calling, skipped around the fact that for the track that he claimed had trainer-wearing toes, the opposite track had the splayed toes he was referencing; this is evidence of toe bending which is very common in Bigfoot tracks. Very long toes cannot be pressed into the ground with great force in walking. They do not directly transmit body weight, but will push down only as a result of the pull of the tendons along their undersides. The muscular strength available to flex or curl such long toes would not be nearly enough to dig them into the ground as deeply as the rest of the foot. Long toes would bend upward with each deeply indented step, yet all footprints show well-indented toe impressions. Pair that with the location that these tracks were found (admittedly we don’t know for sure, but not accounting for it does not mean that these tracks were taken by the side of a highway, and were highly likely not to have been).

      Just for starters... Explain the link below. If you cannot, then we have a means to suggest that biological evidence is being hidden from the public.

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/could-this-be-bigfoot-skull-mk-davis-is.html

      In the mean time...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSgIciThz6Y

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOxuRIfFs0w

      … You were very welcome.

      Delete
    4. Sometimes Joe posts links no one ever visits, and that make him look stupid and ignorant. Sometimes....................Oh wait.........He does that all the time

      Delete
    5. Come from behind the couch... Visit the links, nothing will hurt you. You being in fear of being put straight, ain't my stupidity or ignorance... Hypocritical much??

      Delete
    6. Last time I visited a link here, a bean bag was staring directly at my soul.

      Never again.

      Delete
    7. LOLOLOLOL!!!^

      That was the day I lost my vision. Kind of like looking at Medusa. Only you don't die, but you wish you did.

      Delete
    8. I can assure you I'm not that screwed in the head... Few are.

      Delete
  6. Hey joe I don't now what's going on in this site anymore seems pretty crazy to me there is no more Bigfoot talk?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well what would you like to talk about my friend?!

      Delete
    2. Lets talk about this:

      If you were an avid bigfoot hunter and one day you came across a real bigfoot in the open and got footage of it. Would you:

      a) spend as much time as possible back in the area you saw the creature to get further footage and evidence

      b) never return to the location ever again, not even once

      Delete
    3. I would do what I'm doing right now and that is I seen a bf three years ago in my hunting area that I hunted for 15 years, and now I have enough information to follow threw with my plan and that's to harvest a bf!! In the past three years I have not taken one step in the area of the bf and have payed zero attention to the bf as scary as it is and everything has happen during daylight hours! Also I am a longrange hunter and I intend on shooting frOm a distance grater then 800 yards for safety reasons !!! I can't wait!!! This is my year!! Ttl

      Delete
    4. 5:47...

      This has been blown out of the water sooooo many times. There were major plans to return to Bluff Creek.

      Delete
    5. My rifle scope will also have my iPhone attached to it so everyone will see the shot and impact on the animal so there won't be any excuses and clear footage or no shot or footage!! Ttl during daylight hours!

      Delete
    6. iPhone isn't going to pick up clear and concise footage, especially at 800+ yards and mounted on a rifle barrel.

      Delete
    7. ^^ Less talk, more do. We are tired of hearing you!

      Delete
    8. 10:43 I have clear footage at 1000 yards just using my phone on the scope and it's not a 3 to 600$ rifle scope I paid thousands of dollars for it with no intention of using it for video purposes! I can also put the phone on my spotting scope witch will be clear well beyond 1000 yards, I'm sorry there but until u spend the money on very good quality optics u don't now what there capable of doing! If u spend 3000$ to 5000$ on optics it's a different world of clarity and percision and yes my grammar is terrible thank u ttl

      Delete
    9. Remember joe this money is spent for hunting and shooting purposes and has nothing to do with bf! As far as long range hunting goes and buying a rifle, u get a Honda civic for 2000$ and the sports car of rifles will be in the 4000$ to 9000$ without the scope! U get what u pay for!

      Delete
  7. Other people used my handle on here TTL! And now they erase everything I say lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok.. I should probably fill you in; this blog got so bad to a point, that the moderator's had to ban my name, resulting in comments being whited out if they were posted. This also happens when people use bad language or use particular people's names.

      I think what has happened, is that if you open a comment with my full name (like I know you like to do), then you have had your comment whited out as a result.

      Hope that makes sense?

      Delete
    2. All of it is joes fault.

      Delete
    3. That makes perfect sence cause the only person I talk to on here is u ! So were other people using your name and posting stuff? Cause everything on here seems crazy now wtf! Is happening? If people don't like bf why would they even be on this site?? I now I'm way out of the Internet loop but it seems crazy to me! Also I've when on my Facebook for the first time sence 2009 to contact mr Paulidies and I figured out my email address which has not been used sence 2001! Lol lol that was when I was in Australia! Lol. Ttl!

      Delete
    4. It's because people were attacking me left right and center and using obscene language; also trying to ruin the blog for Shawn.

      There are studies that show internet trolls are basically psychopaths; we'll never totally understand it, but with the help of some Canadian psychologists, we're at least a step closer.

      Peace TTL, good to see you post!

      Delete
    5. Basically Joe played the role of a big grown up baby. He whined to Shawn constantly until he was give some sort of "protection". Joe deserved everything he got, and continues to deserve it. He is a troll himself

      Delete
    6. I'm not the one everyone loathes... I'm neither the one that keeps getting banned only to re-emerge with a three question meltdown.

      For the love of god, go away.

      Delete
    7. You're not the one everyone loathes? Don't be too sure about that one. Personally, I can't stand you and your infantile rants and antics. Your constant waving of the pseudoscience flag while barfing out fringe theories is mind numbing and makes my potato salad seem smart by comparison.

      Delete
    8. I have to agree with 9:54.

      I think Joe is the most universally detested person on the blog.

      Who else has not only nonbelievers but a plethora of believers that despise them? His own peoples don't care for him.

      Delete
    9. "Boo-hoo... Boo-hoo..."

      Cry me a river numbskulls, you can't stand me cause you can't beat me.

      Delete
    10. I just don't like your poor attitude and treatment of others.

      Delete
    11. I can be civil and have been... You don't wanna be treated like a pr*ck then don't treat people like one.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Joe are you looking forward to the premiere of Shooting Bigfoot on BBC4 on Monday 24th March?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it on?!! Really???!!!! Yes, I am now my friend!!!

      Delete
    2. Joe, are you looking forward to your enema this weekend?

      Delete
    3. Joe, you realize that Shooting Bigfoot portrays footers as delusional, backwards bumpkins, no? There is nothing flattering at all about the folks in the movie.

      Delete
    4. I'm not an advocate for shooting one of these creatures but can eject from my own opinion long enough to see why someone would want to for the sake of proving the species.

      I just want to see the movie.

      Delete
  10. When did Kentucky move south to get next to North Carolina ? Or East ? Makes this story a lot more "iffy".

    ReplyDelete
  11. Troll on Joe. When you have no defense, you just claim things have been blown out of the water. Joe is not only a troll himself, but king of the trolls

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your argument up top was blown out of the water here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/photographer-spooked-off-big-spirit.html?m=1

      ... Troll on, old boy.

      Delete
  12. Dr. Ketchum + Mountain Monsters Team = finding bigfoot

    ReplyDelete
  13. Looked back at yesterday a bit and found an individual I did not know of named Robert Kryder, so I spent a couple of hours with his stuff. Quite amazing guy. Like his video of a Sasquatch from 1995 and the technology he used then to bring out detail. It is easy to tell it is huge and not natural to the terrain as it was a half mile away on a top of a mesa.

    Listened to an interview with him on crypto reality radio and he is authentic and brings good knowledge, and does some work a lot of people dream about at times, but never do.

    As for his tracks yesterday if the individual anon had spent any time listening to Cliff Barackman or Jeff Meldrum instead of arguing then he would get an education of circumstances in which they will leave an arched track.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great stuff Chuck... Been meaning to check out a little more of this Kryder gentleman, I thought his comments yesterday pretty amazing. Is that footage you spoke of on YouTube??

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. It is Joe. Youtube - Robert Kryder or Kryder Exploration. He has a few. 3 parter total of maybe 20 minutes.
      Chuck

      Delete
    3. Joe I will also send u a video of me shooting at 800 to 1200 yards just threw the iPhone attached to the rifle scope so u can see the clarity and I can back up everything I'm talking about, also everything I said as far as game cameras go will still be happening for u, I guess u will be a official bf researcher lol anyways, have a good one and ttl!

      Delete
  14. Kentucky and N.C. have always been next to each other only far apart.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story