After 2 Years of Tracking Bigfoot Robert Kryder Finally Caught Up With Conclusive Prints
These incredible photos were just posted by Robert Kryder on Facebook today. Robert tells us he's been tracking this "unit" for two years. He believes there are at least 5 individuals in the group. These tracks are proof that he's getting closer, and perhaps one day we will see footage that could supersede the Patterson-Gimlin footage. Congrats to Robert and his team for their hard work. Robert provided this update about the tracks:
Teaser UPDATE - (KX - GLST W) 03 17 2014 Pulled game cam yesterday, after 7 week operation. The cam triggered once two days after placement within 10 min of placement time at 2:08pm. The the cam failed to trigger for the following duration! But along the route to retrieve the cam I located well over 70 hominid tracks/footprints. They were comprised of at least three individuals, two of which could recognized as subject (B), @ over 10- 1/4", has grown 3/4" since Jan 2014... And that of the new infant (C) @ 6.5", has grown 1/2" since Jan 2014 and is now walking in a full in-line fashion without assistance from the sibling or using its hands/knuckles. In addition to these two familiar subjects, was another who I have not seen sign of before, Subject (E) @ 11-1/4" foot print. Looks like Subject (E) was being baby sitter for Subjects (B) and (C). (E) is obviously fully aware of his tracks, but kept having to deal with the smaller subjects, forcing revealing step placement. ----- Full report/update, pictures and video may be uploaded tonight* (use attached link for for other pic on shares...*)
 |
| 11.5" long x 5" wide |
 |
| Cast of track indicate a large Hominid. |
Kryder and his team has been tracking identifying, collecting evidence, recording audio for over two years now at this site. "Got ca couple brief clips of them on thermal and 13 hours of audio of all kinds, even that of the male killing a large dog while the female and you scream... terrible to hear!" Kryder explained.
Back in 2011, the team discovered first signs of evidence at at the GLST W study area : "Tracks/prints were located that would seem to verify that the scat was from several individuals of different sizes. The tracks were of three subject Hominids (BF) moving upstream not just in sand and mud but through the all but frozen flowing water, on ice and frozen ground, sometime during the night. It appeared that a single large individual subject BF(E) was traveling with two very small subjects (B) and (C) and only let them down to traverse on their own for a stretch of about 100' (out of the 3/4 mi searched)."
 |
| 2011: GLST W study area and immediately discovered sign of BF traveling through |
 |
| 2011: The previous night in the form of a large/loose pile of scat at first |
Read more here: KX CRYPTID-HOMINID RESEARCH GROUP - NM - BIGFOOT
Investigation of the KX GLST W study area and cam installation:
got monkey?
ReplyDeletebanned!
DeleteArt Bell got a plethora of material on bigfoots, he has years talking to people that have had bigfoot encounters
DeleteLick a sack everyone!!!!
DeleteMight be reptilian humanoids they been here for years, lots of people disappear could be taken for experiments
Delete^ True story.
DeleteAlso.........
Bloke in a suit
ahm sayin tham 777 jets abein takin by tham EVIL doers fer shure, U afindin tham jets U gits thams EVIL doers
DeleteEvil doers left the loose poo
DeleteGRAYs have had bases here for years, harvesting DNA and making clones - that 777 was a UFO/GRAY abduction operation
DeleteI'll think you'll find...that it really wasn't abducted by aliens.
DeleteAMAZING TRACKS KRYGER!!!!! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!!!!
DeleteThe tracks look to human . To much arch in the foot . I don't think Sasquatch wears shoes.
DeleteDo a blogtalkradio search for an interview on one of the shows with Kryder research. The best listening! Hes got the big ones where he is.
ReplyDeleteHeffer Alert!!
DeleteQuestion Chick. What part of the country is this taking place.
DeleteChuck
LOL. Bigfoot don't have arches, I am sorry to say. Those are casts of human prints.
ReplyDelete.....true.
DeleteYes, I do agree on that. Also the toes look kind of like they have been in shoes, scrunched together like.
DeleteYou dont have to be lonely, at farmers only dot com. Featuring Chick from bigfoot evidence. Feed her plenty of oats and straw and she will go home with you
DeleteThat was my first thought.
DeleteBigHumanFoot
I would hate to be the guy that drew the short straw, and was charged with leaving a fresh pile of poop at a designated location.
ReplyDeleteTell the truth is was the highlight of your day
DeleteIfn U wanna find tham critters gits U a huntin dog
ReplyDeleteand a AK47 with 30 round mags,
DeleteHunting and tracking dogs will NOT follow BF sign.
Deletehuntin dogs traxs hawgs, coons, posims, deers, bares and such critters, bigfoots abein jist nuther critter to trax
DeleteSure they wont follow the sign, because bigfoot doesnt exist you dunst.
Deletestill be prudent taken your AK47 for your safety
DeleteCoon dog find them squatches fer sher.
Delete"Conclusive"?
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
Do you even know what that word means?
DeleteHere: (of evidence or argument) serving to prove a case; decisive or convincing.
"conclusive evidence"
Yeah. And laughing was his point.
DeleteHonestly I think they're alien foot prints. Long live alienfoot.
DeleteYeah KRYDER, I knew it and it's exactly the reason for laughing.
DeleteAm I smelling the return of the Gay Fish here, boyz?
Yeah, we have a homo fish in the building. These are obviously hoaxed prints
DeleteI am Robert Kryder. BF don't have arches? Did you see the vid?many prints are completely flat even in sand with no arch... but in the same clip you see prints flexed in both up and down curved forms...well beyond that of any human. BF have a hyper flexible foot capable of lying flat and being highly arched or even deeply re-curved. They don't have a stiffened arch like a human.... Also, Sure do look* that way... If we think size we are kidding ourselves. BF are not born 10' ft tall. They have females, kids , teenagers etc... And is your foot nearly 50% of the length wide? There are subtle differences most would not know to notice. Even then until you actually measure the structure. One of many would be the size and robust nature of the 5th metatarsal and its huge pad. The great toe and supporting 1st metatarsal is up to 30% larger than a standard human and articulates more like a thumb. Added to the other many structural differences and macro-dermal pattern*, it falls outside "human". If it were a genetic fluke, it is a perfectly symmetrical and functional bio-mistake. In fact compared to every person I've seen and anatomist have studied this is anomalous at least on every one and over 20 points of measure... But in this case, every clear foot-print located in this GLST research area attributed to BF match each other to a T, with clear sizes ranging from 5" long to 17" long (imprints found up to 22" long). And these as well match other prints I have cast from 40 mi (@ both CRST and PLSA) away that are 15" up to 24" long. When I say match, the mathematical ratios to the foot and complete structure, including the macro-dermal pattern match completely. Yet they match no normal human design.... Add this to the season and conditions... Night time travel, through ice covered water, through mud, rocks, sticks for miles, with young and an infant, all winter long in sub-freezing temps of 10 below, for two years... Compile this with all the hair, scat and audio etc... of this particular unit over the 2 years study... There is no question. We have much more posted of this unit for review. Cheers*
ReplyDeleteGo Kry somewhere else.
DeleteOften times people don't watch the videos (yet still comment on them).
DeletePlease watch the video if you are going to comment on it.
Thanks for additional info.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteYes please do^^
Delete^ Yes, definitely.
DeleteBrilliant info Kryder, great stuff!!
Deletegot monkey?
DeleteHey Kryder, did you use the old truck and rope trick to hoax these prints? Your not fooling anyone. Nice casts of human footprints. Another hoax
DeleteNUMPTYS*** NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS**
DeleteJREF^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^
NUMPTYS*** NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS**
JREF^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^
NUMPTYS*** NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS**
JREF^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^
NUMPTYS*** NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS***NUMPTYS**
JREF^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^^JREF^^^
1:57...
DeleteNo monkeys, just giant hairy people.
1:58...
Those prints giving you a nightmare?
Joe is just like the dope known as Big Jim Jr. Both believe anything and would scour the beaches of Elbe all day long if he could. Turning dog tracks into bigfoot hand prints, and clam shells into bigfoot scat. Thats what happens when you have no friends and were beat as a child
DeleteWhat's with PJ and nightmares? There is no difference between bigfoot and the boogeyman.
DeleteEven if bigfoot were real, you think discovery would make all those family pods step into the open? Maybe start terrorizing all those mean skeptics and nonbelievers? Maybe get you some desired petty vengeance or something?
Yeah. Nightmares, Joe, nightmares.
Those prints look pretty cool to me... No dog tracks here, and you wouldn't be sooooo enthusiastic otherwise, would you? I find it pretty rich you should discuss anyone's childhood when you have the actions of someone who needed a litte extra reassurance about the boogey man.
DeleteTurd.
2:39...
DeleteNo difference between Bigfoot and the Boogeyman... Trolling serves to replace the moma that had enough of reassuring you like a crying little spoilt nerd.
; )
Anyways... Fantastic tracks; lovely seeing you Tards getting nice and sweaty.
DeleteHa!
Mr Kryder, I enjoyed viewing your video with the footprints and scat...Please ignore all the garbage that always shows in the posts....The day will come when you and investigators like yourself will have all the proof you need to prove these creatures exist and thrive where they choose to live...Have a great day!
DeleteGo Key somewhere else? Wow what a brain
ReplyDeleteWay to drop the ball on that one.
Deletelol
DeleteFull report, new vid and pics will be uploaded soon to - https://www.facebook.com/groups/KXCRYPTIDRESEARCHGROUP/ And youtube- http://www.youtube.com/user/KryderExploration
ReplyDeleteThanks Kryder. I will check it out. Hoping you are going to do another show soon!
DeleteHey Chick*... There are things in the works now and I will be doing more interviews soon.Thank you!
DeleteSuperb stuff Kryder, keep up the good work.
DeleteJust another hoaxer. No surprise there
DeleteAll the JREF NUMPTYS finally checking in for the day! Wow, you guys are lagging behind today. Step it up!
DeleteThis site does nothing but promote hoaxers
DeleteKryder needs a blog. I don't do facebook. I prefer to make the NSA work a little for there info.
DeleteYou must be doing something right Kryger!! You wouldn't get this much attention from the idiots if you weren't!!
Delete^ A bigfoot enthusiast hoaxer complementing a bigfoot track hoaxer
DeleteIronic you've given him the most so far.
DeleteIf he didn't have the goods, you wouldn't be doing cartwheels of worry... Pretty pathetic you nerds are.
DeleteSo if you see human shaped/sized prints with squished toes indicating long time shoe wear you're an idiot?
DeleteWhat does that make someone that sees sasquatch in those prints?
Lol @ cartwheels of worry.
DeleteThis place does the same thing every single day regardless of postings or posters.
It's Joe Fitz y'all.
DeleteHerpa derp
2:39... Can't even understand your comment bro.
DeleteYeah that's what I thought...
DeleteYou can't differentiate between natural form of digits and those that have spent a lifetime crammed into boots and shoes?
DeleteBut we're supposed to believe you have a basic understanding of modern genetics?
Yeah...about that.
Nope, I don't understand your turdy grammar and your expertise in trainer-toes... I think you're full of crap.
DeleteI don't claim to know an awful lot about genetics, I know how to deliver the wider facts about this subject though.
; )
Yes, there is a vast difference between naturally barefoot bipeds and those that have spent generations in western footwear.
DeleteHere is a layman description of the varying aspects:
"The human foot is designed such that the toes are spread and extended. This allows for optimal balance and stride. In societies where mainly flip-flops or sandals are used, foot integrity is maintained through life and foot problems are avoided. In industrialized societies however, the foot’s natural shape changes over time. The toes become elevated and pinched together, resulting in weakened flexor muscles combined with overly tight extensors. Subsequently, natural gait and balance are compromised. The main culprit is rigid footwear. The vast majority of footwear in the industrialized world elevates the heel above the forefoot (ball of foot), bends the toes upward (known as toe spring), and squeezes the toes together. Over time, this deforms the foot, leading to a host of foot problems, gait abnormalities, musculoskeletal pathologies."
- (link includes a diagram depicting natural form and the foot shaped by footwear) https://nwfootankle.com/correct-toes
Here is castings showing the difference - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8b/%28Left%29_%28B%29_Adult_foot_that_has_never_worn_shoes%2C_%28Right%29_%28A%29_Foot_of_a_boy_who_has_worn_shoes_for_just_a_few_weeks._Plaster_casts.jpg
As well, if you have ever been to an impoverished country (I doubt it judging by your high sense of entitlement and lack of integrity) you would have witnessed the difference between your white little toes and feet when compared to the splayed and calloused feet of the native people's.
Since you seem to enjoy using Google, at least, go search for all this information by yourself.
Bottom line is these castings by Mr. Kryder are incredibly suspect because of form, narrow ridges, high arch, and cramped toes. Or are we supposed to believe these juveniles, that should have never worn shoes or soles in their lives, have modern western footwear foot forms?
But continue to play the gullible, obnoxious, defensive child because you have been practicing for so long now, I'd hate for you to enter the world of objective thinking.
I'll answer that dribble with one word...
DeleteLocation.
Schooled.
; )
Location doesn't matter. Neither does weather nor substrate.
DeleteYou learned something whether you like it or want to admit it. No matter how much of a childish front you like to put on, no matter how obnoxious you want to be perceived, you were systematically picked apart and proven wrong.
Continue with your elementary actions and ways of thinking though, it has clearly worked wonders for you...
OUCH. Game. Set. Match.
DeleteAlso Rob Kryder....
Rick Dyer...
DicK Ryders?
4:54...
DeleteLocation does matter I'm afraid, it actually means everything... And no foot fetish is gonna change that or make it any less relevant.
It works just fine for me thank you... I'm not the one all angry and upset cause your fetch essay got smacked down with one word.
Ouch!
Also... you skipped around the fact that for the track that you claim has trainer-wearing toes, the opposite track has the spread toes you are referencing; this is evidence of toe bending which is very common in Bigfoot tracks. Very long toes cannot be pressed into the ground with great force in walking. They do not directly transmit body weight, but will push down only as a result of the pull of the tendons along their undersides. The muscular strength available to flex or curl such long toes would not be nearly enough to dig them into the ground as deeply as the rest of the foot. Long toes would bend upward with each deeply indented step, yet all footprints show well-indented toe impressions. Pair that with the location that these tracks were found (admittedly we don’t know for sure, but not accounting for it does not mean that these tracks were taken by the side of a highway, and would highly likely not to have been).
DeleteCarry on with your foot fetish though.
GRAYs have had bases here for years, harvesting DNA and making clones - bigfoots and UFOs operated by the GRAYs
ReplyDeleteHuman shapeed + human sized = HUMAN/YGNALI
ReplyDeleteThem thar be sheepsquatch prints fer sher
ReplyDeleteHERE IS ANOTHER GREAT QUOTE FROM PEDOBEAR LINDSAY
ReplyDelete"Everyone is fading at my age.
Most men my age can’t cum more than once a night. It’s normal. However, last night I got off two times in less than five minutes, which almost otherworldly.
Most women do not ignore me, not all of them. Actually few women ignore me. I tend to provoke reactions in women. At the very least they look at me. But guys my age do get ignored a lot by women.
Women do all of us wrong sometimes or all the time. But enough do me right that life is good.
Some women find me irresistible. How many? Enough.
Not hundreds, that’s not true. I have not had sex with hundreds of females, sorry. I am definitely not screwing hundreds of women at the moment, that’s for sure. Or not even in the last 10 years.
Only want more? True for some. Most women are nymphos though.
I was much more of a player as a young man, not so much as I am getting older. Most such types tend to slow down in middle age."
Uncle Bob is twice the man you'll ever be
DeleteClearly bear tracks.
ReplyDeletemeltdown in 3..2..1..
ReplyDeleteinteresting! Thanks Shawn hope you and the family are well!
ReplyDeleteWe're doing OK. Thanks Lisa!
DeleteTwo years and all you have are the normal stuff. You and that group in Colorado have a lot in common. Bring us some photos' taken on film of this group. Please stop calling them foot prints and change the description to foot impressions. The words "foot prints" are reserved for a known and BF is classified as an unknown.
ReplyDeleteSo if it's a known animal it would have foot prints and an unknown animal has foot impressions? Interesting! I get the impression that many think that it's impossible for a sasquatch to leave an imprint any where because he or she is nowhere to be found.
ReplyDeleteBigfoot toes extend forward to nearly the same distance and are all at least an inch long. The pathetic toes in the photograph, taper to the side and are squished as if they spent their formative years in a sneaker with a tapered leading edge. It's tough being a hoaxer these days, because every yahoo like myself, is book learned about the critical details of footprint casts.
ReplyDeleteLocation.
Deletehttps://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=oa.337550209698554&type=1
ReplyDeletePosted along correction to the laymen here stating wikipedia out of context but obviously not even looked at the linked information or even watched the video. The entire "shoe"comment is a strawman argument and does not apply here. In factout of 100'sof prints from the same subject on the same day at thesame placemany had spread toes, others did not! In soft sand usually spread, but when ascending a clay bank they were always tightly cupped. The toes are small in some photos like here and in many extended. Simply actually watching or looking at the material will reveal all these details and will be easily recognizable to anyone aside from the idiots. And those who say I hoax anything...whats your name?
ReplyDeleteI will be happy to discuss the morphology - And the over 20 main point of structural measure that differ from living human known ! I will back it all with real conclusive evidence and physical examples so better have your ducks in a row. If you cannot approach with better than copy and paste articles that have no context with the subject matter, or if you are not an anatomist or knowing in human morphology/locomotion, or are considered an expert in the BF enigma.... Or have the experience I do or can present as much data gathered by certified pro's.... Then I have no time for your opinion and neither does anyone else!
ReplyDeleteLook at the above video and this link before making any judgment or related comment ... Without doing so, you have nothing to say:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=oa.337550209698554&type=1
http://www.youtube.com/user/KryderExploration
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePublished on Apr 26, 2013
ReplyDeleteMark Zaskey's Crypto Reality
Guest Robert Kryder of Kryder Exploration LLC...(KX)
*** 20 NEW PHOTOS *** Posted to : Bigfoot Evidence PLSA - OLCHP/Oxford Submission -
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=oa.303871539733088&type=1
and KX RESEARCH TEAM -
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=oa.303872233066352&type=1
KX CODE
www.facebook.com/KryderExploration
Kryder Exploration LLC
www.facebook.com/KryderExplorationLLC
KX CRYPTID-HOMINID RESEARCH GROUP - NM - BIGFOOT
www.facebook.com/groups/KXCRYPTIDRESEARCHGROUP
Kryder Exploration LLC Wordpress Blog
http://kryderexploration.wordpress.com/
Mnbrt - Mn.b.r.t. Radio With Robert Kryder - Mar 05,2013
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/37244-mnbrt-mnbrt-radio-with-robert-kryder-mar-052013/
Crypto Reality - KGRA-db -- Global Radio Alliance
kgraradio.com
http://kgraradio.com/portfolio-view/crypto-reality/
Crypto Reality broadcasts LIVE every Wednesday 11pm-1am EST on the KGRA-DB http://kgraradio.com/
Category
Education
Kryder: Big on words, supposed discoveries and detailed description, little of substance and proof. No noted scientist I've heard of has consulted or dealt with Kryder to confirm his findings. The man never seems to finish anything, creates new investigations and leaves everything hanging, no conclusion or conclusion.Just another crypto quack looking for attention.
ReplyDelete