BigfootWeekend September Expedition

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

The Humboldt Waterways Looks Amazing From a Drone


Besides using drones to hunt for Bigfoot, squatchers in Humboldt found some other uses for their eye-in-the-sky. Check out this spectacular view of the Humboldt Waterways from above. We think there's a strong possibility that there's a squatch at 2 o'clock.



140 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. The issue/challenge of modern replication of the PGF costume is an undefined concept that would end up being evaluated by those who already think that Patty is a real Bigfoot. If they say you haven't replicated her - then you haven't replicated her. This is because the entire question is placed upon and anticipated to be decided by those people. Their whim and fancy, no matter how ridiculous and unreasonable, is the goal of any such project. People are proposing to try to replicate the Patty costume to either prove or show that Patty is a hoax or the real thing. But such a project can't do that. The replication isn't Patty, whether she is in actuality fake or real.

      Any PGF replication effort would sidestep a control test. We don't really yet know if anybody can exactly replicate any known creature costume built by anyone else. And don't forget who are the judges of such. Anyone who says that you haven't replicated a creature costume counts as an inability to replicate that costume. Right? Or what?

      About the control test: Motivated persons should first try to replicate known Hollywood gorilla costumes from pre-1970. This is a huge project in itself. You need to exactly replicate a known gorilla costume in dynamic appearance to the satisfaction of everyone. Yes by gosh, there is no difference whatsoever to your new costume and that old one, and by golly we can't even tell them apart no matter how hard we try. In fact, we get confused as to which one is which and it is only the file metadata which allows us to make any distinctions.

      My suspicion is that folks would spend their whole lives and savings trying to exactly replicate a Hollywood gorilla costume circa 1965. Nope, you blew it again. Try adding some dust to that fake fur because the sheen just isn't a replication of what we see. Oops, too much dust now and we have another replication failure. Damn! why can't I make this gorilla costume look exactly like they did in the old days? Hell, mine looks even more like a real gorilla than theirs did. Oh right, hypothetical realism isn't the standard here. Exact replication is the control test.

      We've already got evidence that such control efforts are doomed and it is because of (surprise!) the mentality of the PGF believers. Dfoot was banned by the BFF 1.0 because he tried a version of a control test. He used PhotoShop (or something) to cut Patty from the PGF and paste her into different and modern surroundings. The crowd said that what they saw wasn't a real Bigfoot (they thought they were seeing his own replica suit), but they were looking at Patty herself. He was banned for hoaxing (cutting and pasting Patty without telling anyone he did it). Good Lord Kaboom! The Patty believers weren't even Patty believers.

      This is the reality. There are a handful of Bigfoot believers among the world of people. Of those, there are a handful of PGF believers. Those weirdos represent a mountain that mankind cannot climb. You shall not pass. Your pathetic Patty recreation shall not pass.

      Delete
    2. Whether Patty was real or not...it doesn't matter.

      Bigfoot could still possibly exist. Thousands of people think they do exist not because of this film.

      Delete
    3. Wasn't the long drivel up top smashed apart the other day?

      Got monkey suit? No?? Make one or deal with it bro.

      Delete
    4. Remember that replica Patty suit Bob H was carrying around? It looked like shit.

      Delete
    5. Lol joe. Poor poor form.

      Ok then how about you go make a hank replica otherwise hank is the real deal!

      Delete
    6. Patty was a bloke in a suit.

      Delete
    7. Your right JOE. To this person I would suggest to quit wasting his/her time and get on with something constructive with life. Surely they would have something more that interest them then to spend one once of energy on something they do not believe in.

      I do not know about you JOE. How many sites do you visit on a daily basis or have no idea about to troll and bash the people their that have a lot of knowledge or are experts. I can say zero and most here could say the same thing.

      Chuck

      Delete
    8. Check this out Chuck!

      Online trolls are psychopaths and sadists, psychologists claim

      http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html

      Delete
    9. What's wrong with sociopathic and sadistic traits?

      You act like it's something to be ashamed of? I see it as a badge of honor.

      Surrounded among the elite of the world. Sports, coaches, executives, media personalities, journalists, writers, Presidents, Prime Ministers, marketing geniuses, lawyers, police officers, surgeons...

      You jelly breh?

      Delete
    10. Check this out chuck!

      http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/07/04/bigfoot-on-the-brain/

      Delete
    11. If it isn't the hemorrhoid himself.

      Shall we also take a look at the top ten jobs of sociopaths and psychopaths?

      1. CEO
      2. Lawyer
      3. Media (Television/Radio)
      4. Salesperson
      5. Surgeon
      6. Journalist
      7. Police officer
      8. Clergy person
      9. Chef
      10. Civil servant

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyclay/2013/01/05/the-top-10-jobs-that-attract-psychopaths/

      What's that term again? Schooled? Yeah, that's it, schooled.

      Delete
    12. ... Look at 9:52 dance!!!

      The psychologists from the University of Manitoba, University of Winnipeg and University of British Columbia would consider this a very interesting & telling reaction, would they not?

      Hey, check this out too;

      "Internet Troll Personality Disorder (ITPD) is characterized by a persistent pattern of obstructing of on-topic discussion in online forums and comment threads. People afflicted with ITPD may purposefully present themselves as being inappropriately sexually provocative or racist. Often times they disingenuously express strong emotions with an impressionistic style, pretend to throw arbitrary tantrums, and never hesitate to contribute absurd, non-sequitur remarks at any perceived opportunity."

      ; )

      Delete
    13. Check this out too!

      http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/07/04/bigfoot-on-the-brain/

      Delete
    14. Actually it's quite spot on.

      We call it buck fever around here. When hunters see everything as a deer and shoot. Happens every single year.

      Delete
    15. I've always maintained that 80-90% of all sightings are missidentifications. But that leaves a large amount, most of which are mutiple eyewitness accounts, that your blog page don't account for.

      ; )

      Delete
    16. Joe, if i gave you a special kind of obscure G O L D E N. would you hold it against me?

      Delete
  2. FYI - The red circle is showing the head of the giant penis.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joe had the nerve to call himself a skeptic. Lol. Hes in the self proclaimed "skeptic" gang alright, alongside DWA. You can't make this up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He also accused trolls of being narcissists and psychopaths. Maybe true but is that not calling the kettle black????

      Delete
    2. ^obsessed with trolls who are obsessed with joe.

      MMC

      Delete
    3. ^OBSESSED WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH TROLLS WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH JOE.

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    4. How's your mother, , Ernie?

      Delete
    5. 9:24, I'm doing wonderful!! Thanks for asking. I see you guys are playing nice with my son. That's good. I can never get him out of the basement! Have fun kids!

      Love,
      Ernie's Mom

      Delete
    6. Online trolls are psychopaths and sadists, psychologists claim

      http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html

      "Simply denying mainstream science based on flimsy, invalid and too-often agenda-driven critiques of science is not skepticism at all. It is contrarianism ... or denial," Mann told LiveScience.

      Instead, true skeptics are open to scientific evidence and are willing to evenly assess it.

      "All scientists should be skeptics. True skepticism is, as [Carl] Sagan described it, the 'self-correcting machinery' of science," Mann said.

      http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/just-a-theory-7-misused-science-words/

      Hey Ernie!!!

      ; )

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. Joe is obsessed with himself, your right ernie

      Delete
    9. Doing the day's baby sitting I see, Ernie? Go easy on them bro... They're such sensitive souls underneath the craziness.

      Delete
    10. Very true, Joe Fitzgerald! I hope my son doesn't get caught up with the wrong crowd while he's here. Keep him out of trouble for me. Thank you so much.

      Love,
      Ernie's Mom

      Delete
    11. Ernie should probably get verified.... here I come....

      Delete
    12. I suspect it's just one sad obsessed dude stalking you Joe. Prolly having a meltdown at this very moment, covering himself in peanut butter and fire ants.

      Delete
    13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    14. If you can not understand that the pgf is a hoax then you are not a true skeptic. The skeptics position based on everything surrounding the film combined with the lack of any bigfoot ever means we should be highly skeptical of the film. No ifs buts or maybes.

      Do you even science?

      Delete
    15. Ernie, honey, when you cone upstairs there's two sandwiches I made for you o. the counter. Ham and cheese. Your favorite :)

      I'll be home after work to make dinner. Your father might be there before me Call me if you need anything.

      Love you!
      Mom

      Delete
    16. If it isn't the hemorrhoid himself.

      Shall we also take a look at the top ten jobs of sociopaths and psychopaths?

      1. CEO
      2. Lawyer
      3. Media (Television/Radio)
      4. Salesperson
      5. Surgeon
      6. Journalist
      7. Police officer
      8. Clergy person
      9. Chef
      10. Civil servant

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyclay/2013/01/05/the-top-10-jobs-that-attract-psychopaths/

      What's that term again? Schooled? Yeah, that's it, schooled.

      Delete
    17. 9:40... You are an example of heuristics in that you choose not to agknowldege the physical evidence that supports the subject in the footage to be legitimate.

      There's also no such thing as a magic monkey suit.

      Delete
    18. My Ernie wanted to be a firefighter when he was little! It was so cute. He ran around in his red engine jammies pretending to be driving a fire truck. They grow up so fast!

      Love,
      Ernie's Mom

      Delete
    19. What's wrong with sociopathic and sadistic traits?

      You act like it's something to be ashamed of? I see it as a badge of honor.

      Surrounded among the elite of the world. Sports, coaches, executives, media personalities, journalists, writers, Presidents, Prime Ministers, marketing geniuses, lawyers, police officers, surgeons...

      You jelly breh?

      Delete
    20. 9:51... Weren't you corrected about this yesterday?

      Don't shoot the messenger. Thank The Lord for Canadian psychologists.

      ; )

      Oh... And I think you'll find that the number one place to find psychopaths is in the banking system/stock exchange. You people scream out to be corrected. I saw it on Psychopath Night on Channel 4... Also, look for yourself in Google Search.

      What's the matter... Anyone would think you're deeply offended???

      Delete
    21. 9:51 is your post, Joe. And yes you were corrected. Plenty of times.

      Delete
    22. Check this out chuck!
      http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/07/04/bigfoot-on-the-brain/

      Delete
    23. ^troll induced meltdown, again

      Delete
    24. 9:55... Here is that thread;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/trucker-witnesses-giant-insect.html?m=0

      ... And it was one of my finest displays in weeks.

      ; )

      Delete
    25. Channel 4? Isn't that the channel where Sykes and Evans stomped on your hopes and p**sed on your face?

      I can go around copy and pasting to Marty McF(a)ggggy.

      That's also the same thread where DC tuned you up good. How do you come back here day after day and literally post the same exact stuff? Day after day and you never alter your terrible talkin points. Patty this, MK Davis that. Never anything new or exciting, just the same tired stuff.

      That's the definition of sadism and insanity.

      Delete
    26. 10:00... And here is that meltdown maker again...

      "Bryan does believe, as do I and everyone else at Bigfootology, that there is something out there and we continue our work to discover “WHAT” they are, not “IF” they exist. When Bryan began this project with us he had a healthy skepticism for the Bigfoot phenomenon. Bigfootology team member, Thomas Finley, presented Bryan with an honorary team member certificate in the UK and when Bryan began traveling with me and spending hours upon hours with other Bigfooters and going out into the field with us he began to realize that there is something genuine to the reality that there is something unknown out there, more than just a bear. Very quickly into this DNA project Bryan became an official member of Bigfootology and has been one of our lead scientists since and his goal is the same as ours which is to find the answer to the Bigfoot phenomenon, “What are they?” Bryan’s rally cry to all of us is, “Get the real evidence.”

      "The results aired on the television shows do not compromise Bryan’s paper in peer review. The show is purely entertainment and as I said before, we had no control over it. So the concerns of some people who think that results revealed in the show are leaks from the paper are unfounded. We kept things quiet for so long, why would we suddenly “leak” anything? We are a professional organization and adhere to the proper scientific process."

      - Rhettman Mullis

      ... Cue the 'disgusting hypocrite' names...

      Dan's argument was that there is no biological evidence, but the quotes up top I provided you would suggest that won't be an issue for long.

      Something you missed during your cheerleading last night, old boy.

      ; )

      Delete
    27. ^ Coo-coo!!!

      always some copy/pasting from guys that claim to know what Sykes think. Why doesn't Sykes in person show up and tell us his thought about Bigfoot?

      Delete
    28. That literally says nothing and you know that. "We hope, he's open to, get the real evidence, we adhere to proper protocol, blah blah blah."

      Just an optimistic way of opening your mouth when you have nothing worthwhile of saying.

      Again, you literally post the same thing day after day. Don't you get tired of this listless way of life and thinking?

      Delete
    29. Ok... Ask yourself, why would someone likes Sykes allow Mullis to make such statements?

      ; )

      Delete
    30. Daniel... It's plain and simple, who looks more daft after reading those quotes?

      Come on bro, you have to admit, you can't juggle that any other way.

      Delete
    31. Oh... And as long as people are pasting the same arguments (I didn't start it, merely posted a link that true), then I'll respond the same way.

      Delete
    32. Ask yourself this...

      Why should Sykes take time to address something so insignificant that under 5 people in the bigfoot world (which is fringe already) take as an indicator of bigfoot.

      The letters say nothing of importance and nothing of merit, it's just a known liar blowing optimistic smoke circles in the air.

      Now instead of making a FB post about it, if he appeared on CNN at 5pm and started saying how Sykes has irrefutable proof of bigfoot and making wild claims instead of free speculations, then I would expect Sykes to step up and clear the air.

      Mullis is an insignificant peon that wishes to believe he's bigger than he is.

      Even at the BFF Sykes thread, you'd be in a tiny minority that believe Sykes has positive unconditional proof of Sasquatch.

      You're nothing but a hopeless romantic for bigfoot, clinging on to old underwear and pillow cases because it smells of your love.

      After all the fails and words you folks have had to eat, year after year, decade after decade...you'd think you'd show a bit of humility and err on the side of caution.

      If Sykes shows up with no attachment to a living unknown bigfoot hominid, you should probably hand in your BFE username and go back into the dark, damp corner on Wales you crawled out of.

      Delete
    33. Daniel, you could swear the comments by Mullis have hit a nerve?

      There's no way Sykes would let Mullis speak on his behalf, come on bro... If you were as credible as Sykes, why would you let him reassure the Bigfoot community? The study is called the Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project and Bigfoot is widely thought to be a relict hominid, there are three projects in one also... Not just one.

      Let's see what happens, eh?

      ; )

      Delete
    34. You seem to be reading into something that Mullet never said, Hoseph.

      No where in his quotes does he say that Sykes has irrefutable and unconditional proof of bigfoot.

      He just said the shows weren't the full results and he still has a paper in peer review. Do you read overly optimistic view's as conclusive proof? Maybe that's why you get backed into a corner scientifically everyday.

      So yet again, more stories and circumstantial evidence while completely lacking hard, conclusive, biological evidence.

      When Sykes doesn't release the results you were hoping for, Hoseph, will you actually start vetting your sources and ideas before you idiotically post them?

      Delete
    35. I'm not stating that their in the quotes are proof, I'm stating that the signs for your so dearly requested 'biological evidence' might not be far off at all... Wouldn't that be amazing? Remember, you'd love this creature to be real, remember?

      What's the matter Daniel? Of there was nothing to worry about, why so agitated??

      Chill the beans, nothing's certain yet and we don't know the long term results, regardless of one of Sykes' research partners leaking information.

      ; )

      Delete
    36. It would be amazing, astonishing as a matter of fact. There are also signs of the apocalypse but that doesn't make the Bible truth.

      The "signs" you are parading around is just another liar in the world of bigfoot saying optimistic things.

      Let's take the pessimistic stance now, Hoseph, since we explored the optimistic side....

      "Sykes and Mark Evans indefinitely hurt the credibility of Yeti stories with his conclusion of bear DNA. They made a mockery of Dan Shirley, Derek Randles (big time), Justin Smeja, and that fat Indian guy who burns sage in the wind. They found Zana and her relatives are not Neandertal despite outrage from Historian Igor Burtsyev and Dmitiri SmirnoffVodka."

      "Sykes while having a paper in peer review does not guarantee it will pass peer review and obtain professional publication."

      "Nobody but Sykes and his personal scientific team know the contents, subject, nor results of the paper he submitted for peer review"

      "The embargo is still in full effect."

      So there is the pessimistic reality, Hoseph. I get agitated that I have to take time from my day to explain things in full as if you were a child just learning the ways of the world. If I wanted to deal with childish views and insufferable attitudes, I would have became a teacher.

      Delete
    37. Mainly, I detest dealing with inaccurate embellishments, people that spread inaccuracies, and people that do so with a smug attitude. I also dislike people that don't exude personal responsibility for their words and actions.

      Conveniently, all those attributes roll up into a Welshman that posts here. You're the antithesis of science and a prophet of falsities, the Baron of zero evidence as it were.

      Delete
    38. Signs of apocalypse? I think you'll find that climate change buddy.

      Not only terribly dated... I think you'll find that those cynical takes on the study so far doesn't really compare to something from the horse's mouth, and Mullis has been working on hominid project with Sykes, I know that hurts but it's the truth.

      You can't really compare them to be honest... And if such statements from that proverbial horses mouth should be more positive than what you would prefer, then I think I won't get all panicking Skywalker like you and 'version' it another way, cause I don't have to... Cause I'd 'love this creature to be real'.

      You 'don't like this'... You 'don't like that'... Anybody ever explain to you that nobody cares, Danny Boy? In actual fact, I have science on my side in Sykes it seems.

      And your biological evidence could be on the way.

      ; )

      Delete
    39. Oh... And an interview recently with Rhettman Mullis revealed some amazing news... What was particularly interesting was the part when he said that that the study had two significant DNA finds. Also, it was quite interesting to hear of a person who was tested for their DNA who was the descendant of a person called Patrick who had a sloping forehead, longer arms, wider feet, bigger hands, was incredibly strong with an amazing tolerance to the cold. What makes it even more interesting, is that this individual was identified by others in his community that knew of old family members stories of a female family member being taken; completely oblivious to this individual.

      Again... Sykes is an active member of Bigfootology of which Mullis is the founder. Sykes has been in close affiliation with Mullis in attaining research accumulation for the Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project.

      Now I'm not suggesting for one minute Sykes has proven Bigfoot or is going to... But it's nice seeing you get all panickin' Skywalker, I must say.

      Delete
    40. And Daniel... Before you get personal again... Take a deep breath...

      Delete
    41. This is too rich. First of all, Daniel destroyed Joe above, just like normal. Second, Joe appears to have entered pre meltdown b/c Daniel schooled him so bad. Third, kind hypocrite himself talking about no one caring about Daniel. When wasnt it too long ago that a certain someone cried to Shawn, the other mods, and the viewers of BE to save him from the trolls and fake Joe's. And after many weeks, Joe finally realized no one cared. So much so that during one of his meltdowns, he admitted it, and claimed "Who cares if Shawn doesnt care about me, you do, you care so much". Joe, you have been thoroughly shcooled.

      Got patty butt diaper??

      Delete
    42. http://youtu.be/wQr922oWdgY

      Destroyed, meltdown, crying all the time... Got friends?

      Delete
  4. Some one answer. Where is the modern day photo or pic of big foot I can't find one. Please don't refer me to a 1960s blurr fest. I need a clear modern pic. In this day and age there has to be one some where.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't have a pic of something that doesnt exist.

      Delete
    2. The PGF by and large isn't blurry. It's clear and an extended piece of film. Most don't see the whole thing, the rear view section at the end is usually excised, ignored, but it's some of the most important footage within the film.

      Delete
    3. 9:28...

      YouTube; 'Leaping Russian Yeti'... Make sure it's the MK Davis version as he has out screen shots to it.

      Delete
    4. Lol^ compare that to any other wildlife photo of a real creature. It isnt clear. Not even close.

      Wheeling out the leaping yeti means that joe lost and is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

      Delete
    5. It is a great question, however. I believe in the possiblilty of bigfoot (having had an experience or two myself).

      It's very frustrating to watch this discussion nearly daily on this old film. Definitely need something new and get this old thing on the shelf.

      With all the technology etc...am afraid my "belief" will gradually grow less and less
      and eventually I will have to chalk my "experiences" up to something else.

      And am sure that will be the same for the many hundreds (thousands) of others who have had sightings and experiences over the years.

      Delete
    6. PGF was a hoax done by known hoaxers.

      Delete
    7. 9:42... Classic narcissist! Just because you can't explain the footage, that doesn't suddenly become my problem.

      You got schooled and that's no one else's barrel scraping.

      ; )

      Delete
    8. Schooled?

      You mean how in 47 years there hasn't been a clear photo or film of bigfoot? Not one molecule of organic evidence ever found? Of a gigantic beast that have to have a viable breeding population that number in the thousands?

      Thousands of these creatures but no hair, scat, bones, soft tissue even though all these people look for them and "track" on a daily basis.

      It doesn't take a statistician to see how bad your odds are.

      Delete
    9. Patty and Russian Yeti; there's your clear photographs. This creature has 70% of the country in wilderness to hide in... Plenty of hair, scat, tracks, these are all coming in consistently to this day.

      The sightings are what one would expect exactly from a nocturnal type of human that buries it's dead.

      Delete
    10. Hoseph, you know very well that the Davis Yeti is not clear. Open up a National Geographic, that's clear pictures. Patty is 2x as clear as Davis Yeti and it was shot 47 years ago.

      Plenty of hair and scat that consistently test as known animal.

      You don't have a single conclusive result from biological evidence that shows bigfoot's existence because we wouldn't even be harping about it right now, it'd be a done said fact. But it's not and you're resorted to posting "BUT LOOK AT PATTY AN LEAPING YETI!!" Day after day after day like it's suddenly going to change something.

      It's not. It's just a ploy to get people to talk to you because you're lonely and miserable.

      If you really wanted to talk about bigfoot and have serious conversations then you'd be posting at the BFF and not the anonymous spam blog of the Internet.

      Delete
    11. Daniel, why are you so sensitive today?? Didn't you email Fuerst about our much discussed unknown primate DNA findings? Wasn't the response to that meant to be posted here??

      I probably should have been a little more specific actually, as whilst the Leaping Yeti isn't clear, it does show some very interesting screen shots and has a subject in motion akin to that of a wild ape. This is why I use it so much, no more than lately as you see a creature with a diaper hurt achieving all the stealth that Patty 'can't do' with a big bum-bums.

      As I stated up top... Biological evidence might not be far off with Sykes allowing people to reassure the Bigfoot community in such a way... Eh? Until then we have the mounds of physical and circumstantial evidence to keep us pushing in the direction of seeking that ever elusive grail of Bigfoot evidence (and you'll have me celebrating the 200 years of print media, giant skeleton studies and Ohio State DNA too!)

      Daniel, isn't this nice? Didn't you miss these exchanges?? I know I did... Wouldn't you miss me if I went over to the BFF???

      Delete
    12. Whats that?? You say Joe is talking about the only 3 subjects he knows?? And what would those be?? Patty, Leaping Russian, and Sykes?? I AM SHOCKED!!! Its like he has no other knowledge other than that, and that he is just copying and pasting blindly.

      Oh wait...........yep, thats right.......King Hypocrite has been blowing a little too hard.

      Delete
    13. Last time I checked... I can nail you on anything I choose to bring up, that's why you're aaaaaaaaallll angwy and upset, isn't it??

      ; )

      Delete
  5. DRONES the new way of Finding Bigfoots

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joe has stated that hank is real because if an identical match to something doesn't exist then it had to be real!

    Too easy. Bloke in a monkey suit strolling on the bluff Creek while his mates are filming and in tears with laughter at this ridiculous suit with hairy titties and diaper butt goes ambling along the creek. Bet roger and gimlin had a proper laugh that day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think Hank is real. But Patty certainly is. No way that's a suit if you study the film, the movements, the muscle formation, the overall physiology etc. Way too sophisticated to be a suit. Even now fwhen olks that try to hoax with their suits it's so very obviously fake. Bob H's patty replica suit that he was showing off looked like shit.

      Delete
    2. Wittle ernie is getting angwy

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Awe is wittle Ernie Homo getting angwy and confused?

      Don't worry child the voices in your head will stop when you pull that trigger.

      Delete
    5. So?

      You gonna pull that trigger and make it more entertaining or what?

      Delete
    6. Let me load that weapon since they're banned in England, I know you don't know how to.

      Here you go,

      Pull that trigger.

      Delete
    7. I can't say I'm too sad that I don't.

      (Shudder)

      Delete
    8. 11:30,that's not a nice thing to say is it !!

      Delete
    9. 11:30 - I don't reside in England.

      Obsessed.

      Delete
    10. Please boys. You were playing so nice together.

      Listen, my Ernie doesn't have a lot of friends. He's cut off from most of the world playing that darn second life all day in the basement.

      He really needs this you guys. He's a good kid. Give him a chance. Thanks so much!

      Love,
      Ernie's Mom

      Delete
    11. Interesting that Ernie and Joe defend themselves in the exact same way and use the exact same phrases.

      Just wait Ernie, your special troll is on the way. Better get verified

      Delete
    12. And it would simply be as easy as that, and you'll be crying for the next ten months like a child with PD calling everyone hypocrites again.

      What a creepy-crawly you are, ha ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
  7. The thing is, that this Joe guy has broken our ball with his fool theory about Zana being Bigfoot and Bigfoot having 100% modern human DNA and being totally human, then, after a bit of time, he comes back with another statement and says that an inconclusive, unverified, non peer reviewed hair sample that initially gave the result of an unknown primate DNA, it's also Bigfoot.

    Isn't this the biggest auto-schooling ever?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Bryan is currently working on a way to further determine if her African lineage is a modern or relic human. When he is successful at that determination we will announce the findings."

      - Rhettman Mullis.

      One example of unknown primate DNA... Is one example of unknown Primate DNA. Because you haven't got an angle for the contrary, that's not my problem. Forget publishing something that's gonna be ridiculed anyway... That also requires at least two more examples of it to be published anyhow. Oh, and Ohio State is the best forensic hair lab in the world.

      Peer reviews... Ha! We have examples of peer reviews missinforming and lying, by your logic all peer reviewing processes should be useless.

      Ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    2. "Bryan is currently working on a way to further determine if her African lineage is a modern or relic human"

      Do you know that by saying human he actually means human, and not Bigfoot? Bigfoot is only in your head, sorry bro

      Delete
    3. The 'relict properties' in her morphological differences; ie, what features rendered her to be described perfectly to the 'T'; looking like a Bigfoot.

      Delete
    4. Oh... And it might be news to you, and I'm not suggesting for one second I know why this has happened, but off the back of that statement, Sykes book on the Yeti study has now been put back a few months.

      Delete
    5. ... Could mean nothing... Could mean... ?????

      Delete
    6. could and robably means nothing. when sykes will show up and pronounce the word "bigfoot" I'll hear him. So far, he showed up and pronounced "polar bear" and "100% subsaharian human", so get over this.

      Delete
    7. You know that Joe has been schooled and is goind meltdown when he posts 3 times in a row

      Delete
    8. 10:34... You could prove to be right, but until then... Like all good scientists; Sykes will not settle for leaving those morphological features a mystery, heuristics hasn't stopped him in his tracks like most scientists these days.

      Oh, and Sykes isn't likely to use the word 'Bigfoot'; he'll use 'relict hominid' or something similar.

      ; )

      Delete
    9. don't start to find excuses, he used the word Bigfoot in the past (Bigfoot files, remember?) during the show and will use if he will find Bigfoot. Don't start to find excuses if he'll start to talk about hominids or humans, they just are hominids or humans. If these relate somewhat to Bigfoot, he'll say "they relate to what is know as Bigfoot" and explain why. There is no assumption or smoky language in science.

      Again, get over this

      Delete
    10. Escuses?

      Bigfoot are widely regarded as relict hominids... They have done by the Russians for many decades... This might be news for you, or even difficult to hear, but that would account for over two thirds of the enthusiast theories on what this creature is, which is moving away from a bipedal gorilla.

      I find it rich you should talk of assumptions.

      I think you'll find Sykes' study is called the Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid project and name of that programme, I programme that took the initial sample results from the very earliest stages of the study, does in no way shape or form represent Sykes' long term agenda.

      You were very welcome.

      Delete
    11. ^ LIFTOFF! WE HAVE A LIFTOFF!

      Delete
    12. Oh... And in case you were implying I was making excuses about the relict properties of Kwit, that's actually being as scientific as you can get, in the sense that it is important to wait for all the facts to be heard, regardless of what those results turn out to be.

      Delete
    13. Looks like Joe is getting ready to have a meltdown. I wonder if his other account, Ernie, will also have one at the same time.

      Delete
    14. The Canadian psychologists had you in mind... Poor little fella hasn't been able to stop rocking on his desktop stool since his perfect world got all Munnsy.

      Delete
  8. No! Fireworks, Rave lights and Whale sounds, those make sense!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Check this out chuck!! http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/07/04/bigfoot-on-the-brain/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jim Henson created bigfoot then replaced him with snuffleufagus and big bird.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I saw something that has me wondering, what i saw! Boone co. wv while camping. Was leaving campsite to go home after dark. A creature ran across the road in front of me... I thought what the hell was that? I thought it was a hyena, sloped down from shoulders to hindquarters. 45 degrees or so. Ran with front paws in unision as opposed to a dog..ect. Ran like a ape..actually...had a canine muzzle..and long matted ha ir. Was super fast crossing. the road. Always wondered. what the heck it was. anyways..never read about quadraped bf or dogfaced bf before. Thing that make me go.....hmmmmmm! What the heck was it. light colored hair...long...matted..looked weird. thanks...this us a Bigfoot site...right

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check out some Linda Godfrey on YouTube and see if what you saw is familiar to anything she has researched.

      Many people have seen and reported what you saw, any more details?

      Delete
    2. Joe..Saw it in a reclaimed strip mine...very remote area if wv. snout or muzzle looked. squarish...boxy if you will. Not very big..3 foot tall or so...very quick.. it was very strange looking creature. never noticed any ears..sighting was in southern wv

      Delete
    3. Is there a way I can contact you off this blog?

      Delete
    4. I don't know how much I am aloud to say at this time, but I know of a very recent account that might make you quite amazed.

      Keep en eye out on this blog for the next few days.

      Delete
    5. Lol, that dude just made that crap up Joe. Anyone who has ever been to Boone County WV knows that they dont use diction like that, lol. You got played like a flute again Joe Joe

      Delete
    6. My dad is from boone co. i was raised in kanawha co. I am edumacated..fool. My diction comes from a love of books and language.Deverbeau in wv

      Delete
  12. lots of Indians recount that bigfoots are cannibals in their folklore they recount of bigfoot attacking villages and eating their captors

    ReplyDelete