Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Must Watch: Photo Of A Yowie, The Australian Bigfoot

This photograph was taken in 1936 in an isolated bush region of NSW. It recently resurfaced in an Australian television series called "The Extraordinary". New technology sheds light on this photo, which may be the clearest photo of a Yowie in existence. Watch the video below:


  1. Replies
    1. Hello everyone in Bigfoot Evidence land!!

      Check out this link to a video of a school teacher called Neil Frost. He is a multiple time witness, who has people who have seen the Yowie with him, whilst his community has been pestered by Yowies for years. Check this out and tell me what you think bro...


      Neil contacted the local aboriginal tribes elders to which he was advised to take care, because the Female Yowie, who steal children's clothing from washing lines are actually in the premature stages of taking a child. This has an eerie similarity to Missing 411, where David Paulides' current book tells of missing people in Australia, to which there are two many to count.

      Here's another interview with a gentleman of the name of Dean Harrison. Now this guy is tough and I think you will agree is very credible...


      The following link are wildman stories from Australia, from early printed media. You will notice, a fascinating woodcut from 1790, of what appears to be a wildman/Yowie being held by two men with muskets...


      Here is a historical perspective of the Yowie...


      When considering the Australian Yowie (and I use this creature in comparison as I firmly believe I am talking about the exact same creature as Bigfoot), there is a fascinating account of 'The Wildman of Monaro' (you can find this in Google Image Search) that tells of a sighting of a gorilla-type being holding what appeared to be a nulla-nulla; this is an Aboriginal war/hunting club. Furthermore; the images of Medieval European Woodwose almost always portray these beings as possessing a large stick-like club. This is also true of some of the accounts from American 19th century printed media that D L Soucy reads out on YouTube, that account for many American Wildmen with clubs...



    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    3. There was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus" by anthropologists. These people were of very large size--estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read. These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humaness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of "gigantopithecus blacki"--named after the discover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds.

      In old river gravels near Bathurst, NSW, huge stone artifacts; clubs, pounders, adzes, chisels, knives and hand axes... All of tremendous weight, lie scattered over a wide area. These weigh anything from 8, 10, 15, to 21 and 25 pounds, implements which only men of tremendous proportions could possibly have made and used. Estimates for the actual size of these men range from 10 to 12 feet tall and over, weighing from 500 to 600 lbs. A fossicker searching the Winburndale River north of Bathurst discovered a large quartzitised fossil human molar tooth, far too big for any normal modern man. A similar find was made near Dubbo, N.S.W.

      Prospectors working in the Bathurst district in the 1930's frequently reported coming across numerous large human footprints fossilised in shoals of red jasper.

      Even more impressive were fossil deposits found by naturalist Rex Gilroy around Bathurst. He excavated from a depth of 6 feet (2 m) below the surface a fossil lower back molar tooth measuring 67 mm. in length by 50mm. x 42 mm. across the crown. If his measurements are correct, the owner would have been at least 25 ft. tall, weighing well over 1,000 lbs!

      At Gympie, Queensland, a farmer, Keith Walker, was ploughing his field when he turned up the large fragment of the back portion of a jaw which still possessed the hollow for a missing lower back molar tooth. This is now in Rex GiIroy's possession. The owner of the tooth would have stood at 10 feet tall.

      In the Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains NSW, a Mr P. Holman found in ironstone protruding from a creek bank the deeply impressed print of a large human-like foot. The print was that of the instep, with all 5 toes clearly shown. This footprint measures 7 inches across the toes. Had the footprint been complete it would have been at least 2 feet (60 cm in length, appropriate to a 12 foot human. However, the largest footprint found on the Blue Mountains must have belonged to a man 20 feet tall!

      A set of 3 huge footprints was discovered near Mulgoa, south of Penrith, N.S.W. These prints, each measuring 2 ft long and 7 inches across the toes, are 6 ft. apart, indicating the stride of the 12 ft. giant who left them. These prints were preserved by volcanic lava and ash flows which "occurred millions of years" before man is supposed to have appeared on the Australian continent (if one is to believe the evolutionary theory): Noel Reeves found monstrous footprints near Kempsey, N.S.W. in sandstone beds on the Upper Macleay River. One print shows toe 4 inches (10cm) long and the total toe-span is 10 inches (25cm) - suggesting that the owner of the print may have been 17 feet tall.

      It is certain the Aborigines were not the first to reach Australia.
      Anthropologists maintain mainland Aborigines are in fact quite recent arrivals that ate their predecessors who were akin to the New Guinea natives. Aborigine themselves admit in their ancient folklore that this land was inhabited by several groups of men, as well as giants, before they settled here.

      For further reading on Rex Gilroy;



    4. Anything after this comment with my name to it, certainly won't be me, as I'm sure that geek that had a breakdown will be along soon, much to people's amusement.


    5. I have given myself a new avatar to better represent my feelings for everyone of you geeks here. I am the real joe. Anything after this comment with my name and old avatar will not be me.

    6. If the photo is real how do three guys 2 sitting like 10 feet away one looking right at it not see or smell an animal that by the pic is 10 feet tall 5 ft wide. And that's sitting down.

    7. I think you'll find two men behind me in my living room, tied up, gagged, sweaty and ready.

      The thing about this is my two Tom cats keep spraying them.

      I love me sweaty, ready, gagged and tagged, Tom cat urine soaked men.


    8. I'm such a numpty that I gloss over the fact when giving arbitrary information that Meganthropus is just Homo Erectus fossils.

      Will somebody come pway with Joey Fitz???

    9. I'm a sad little coward that doesn't know his facts, no wonder I've had to resort to this as opposed to being a real man... Heck, everyone knows who I am anyway, didn't I have my arss handed to me the past six months? Not the first breakdown I've had.

      The Meganthropus fossil specimens are LINKED in morphology to Homo erectus, and there are many enthusiasts who claim that Bigfoot is indeed such a hominid.

      That is all.

    10. You see, pee is linked to poop and many people feel diarrhea is just pee you poop. I feel this is common sense.

      But where does one draw the line? Color? Viscosity? Kernels?

      I find when you poo and it's like sneezing with a lip full of dip, that's where my common sense tells me it's no longer pee.

    11. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganthropus

      Stop making blind and extreme assumptions, other Joe, your stupid is showing.

    12. Start broadening your horizons than just a collaboratively edited Internet encyclopedia, silly boy.

      "This is the most widespread scientific theory on Meganthropus: for the most part it is only regarded as part of the Homo erectus hypodigm (to recycle a pedantic word). However, it should be noted that there is a very limited amount of material available (i.e. Sangiran 6) and that there has been a lot of recent research done by individuals who do not necessarily believe this (Kaifu et al and Tyler).

      Tyler proposes a species related to Homo erectus (presumably either a direct offshoot or sister group) to be named either Homo palaeojavanicus (2001) or Homo meganthropus (2004). Kaifu et al 2005b erroneously state that he regards this as an Australopithecus africanus / Homo habilis (not conventionally equated) which he mentions nowhere. He does mention older propositions of those taxa being present in his papers though, and possibly related to Meganthropus."

    13. Often when backed into a scientific corner, I use Google to search for arbitrary information that, while not confirming my position, will give an indication that I know what I'm talking about. Often times the articles posted, to a critical thinker, show my insecurities in triplet and go against my position in the first.

      I just love using Google to find blog postings and the opinions of amateur bloggers.

      It's not my fault, I can't think for myself. I always have to "go there."

      The REAL Joe.

      (Any post after this is surely my imposter and only goes to prove my point.)

    14. Sometimes when I get absolutely smashed by the real Joe, and get exposed for a stupid little geek with no debating skills, I have to "blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah" and resort to copying people's avatars because I am stupid, creepy and perverse.

      What a joke of a human being I am, that I can't man up and swallow the fact that I get ruined by the real Joe so often that I have to resort to the most coward-like of tactics.

    15. Oh and 12:26... I know who you are by the way.

      ; )

    16. Imposter ^

      The complaint is in!!! Enjoy it while it lasts!

    17. If you know who I am then you know I'm not the only one at work here. There is at least 2 others as well.

      None of that really matters though seeing as I'm still here, the others are still here and you can't post uncontrollably about stupid off topic personal items.

      What happened to your self reflection moment?

    18. Oh there's no doubt there maybe one other of you... But I know who one of you are, and it's totally understable you having this breakdown; nothing you haven't gone through before.

      The blog is called Bigfoot Evidence and therefore never wander from the relevant subject matter, silly boy. It is a measure of how bitter you at more socially capable that you should cry about someone being 'able' to say hi to someone else.

      Self reflect? Man... I've been loving the attention, you're making me immortal at this rate, and everyone knows what I'm about, so you're just letting the world know how important I am to you.

      You'll continue to get smacked about forever... I have the patience of ten of you and nothing will make me stop posting around here; you will realize that by the end.

      You are helpless, hopeless and seriously angry after reading that, eh? Go and self reflect on how much of a scared little geeky coward you are.

    19. Joe,

      How does it feel to be destroyed on a daily basis on this site?? So much so, that you ran crying and screaming away. Please tell us Joe??

    20. Hey Joe, Where you going with that gun in your hand...?

    21. I'm still here guys... And the only thing destroyed in that thread was your naivity to the Yowie phenomena.

      You were very welcome.

  2. Replies
    1. They have blobsquatch'es down under too

    2. I know I showed this a couple times before. I can't find any outward signs of photoshop

      This is the clearest pic of BF I know



    3. It's FAKE!!!!!!
      Read the disclaimer on the bottom of the Ourbigfoot website:
      "This big foot website is intended for
      entertainment purposes only.
      It is for fun, and fictional at best.
      Hope you enjoyed your visit!"

    4. Maybe you have been isolated in too many bush regions lately.

    5. Joe, I would prefer that you call me by my name, gay fish, form here on out. Thanks


  3. Yowie orrery critters eats U fer shure

  4. Replies
    1. chupacabras come up on U real quite lack, then thay on U fer shure

  5. thar bez tham Yowie in da deep woods fer shure, lots of folks talks abouts tham critters fer yeers

  6. Early settlers' diaries spoke of PJ's isolated bush region.

  7. Why are the two men off center? If he's just taking a picture of them, he would have centered them to the frame.

    1. Had to make sure he left room on the negative so that he could add a Yowie.

    2. they bez in da bush, yowies keeping a low profile

    3. I love the new Joe. Please continue!!!

  8. GRAYs on U before U know it

  9. There goes this site allowing whatabee's to impersonate others; because, they have a personal vengence against the better Joe, etc. This is one of the reasons this subject is not taken seriously; because, of cry babies that are too scared to go out and find real evidence out back and slander those that have a intrest in this hard to believe reality. Fake Joe you have issues and it proves the real Joe is more of a man then you.

  10. Thanks for ruining the page, why isn't anyone deleting all the idiot comments.