Listen To This Aussie's Encounter With a 6' Yowie
Here's an account about a group of young men set off on foot after trail bike riding deep in the forests near Bathurst. They can't believe their eyes as they are confronted by a large creature over 6ft tall and covered in hair, climbing down a tree.
Late night first!
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely love these Yowie psts Shawn!! Keep em coming!!
DeleteToo easy.
DeleteGot monkey?
inb4 I'm going meltdown
Deletebigfoot is so cool it makes my pee pee hurt!
Delete^^^ Oh your way past meltdown ------ how much time have you spent posting under others names. You are way past meltdown, more like a floor-stain. ha ha ha ha
DeleteMatter of fact, thats kinda you exactly. Astain on a bathroom floor where a kid had diarea and missed the toilet.
"You are the most un-interesting stain in the world!" You should do a beer commercial for old milwakee.
^ Anon me
DeleteI like posting anon and make people believe I have friends thinking like me
DeleteGlad to see you making us proud again unverified. Oh, and that was Joe posting at 6:22. He is furious you are back. Get him, get him good.
Deleteyeah I predicted I was going meltdown
DeleteWhen do you think you will start deleting comments?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHey real Joe, check your youtube messages.
Delete^ Obsessed with me
DeleteDC and everyone knows it^
DeleteSNOOZE
Nope. Thanks for playing though.
DeleteKeep it up unverified joe. Love your work.
and DC just proved it^
Delete^Joe getting frustrated b/c Joe gets called out for the loser he is, everywhere he goes.
DeleteMMG Sr.Saturday, February 8, 2014 at 8:01:00 PM PST
DeletePersonally, I find it hilarious that we trolled them so hard that they had to revamp this place with tags, verification, and white text.
Fake Joe's not only pwned "Joe," but did such so hard that these changes had to happen.
Poor little feller.
Can't let the cat out of the bag if you expect to keep your cash cow.
Shawn has done well here. I certainly wouldn't turn down the profit from ads and all the sponsorship funding with all the troll and footer traffic.
There will be a great void here soon, count on that.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/bigfoot-bounty-stars-caught-on-private.html?m=0
Oh... And for your information, MMG Sr was another one of Dan's aliases, like Mike Honcho. Everyone knows Danny Boy is trolling everyone because his complaints about me fell on deaf ears. Pouted like a child and tried rallying his 'friends' to his imaginary blog.
Oh dear...
Joe please check your email.
DeleteLOL. Joe posting as Ernie to try and give himself some validation. Possibly even funnier than him creating the account to begin with. Joe, when you post as Ernie do you post pics of the cleanup in emails?
DeleteJoe trying to call out other people for making other accounts.......priceless. Especially right after Joe commented to his own remarks under his other account, Ernie. Notice how the statement of the day seems to be to tell Joe to check his email. Thats funny. Joe, how does it feel to be such a loser that you have to tell yourself via a muppet account to check your own emails. PATHETIC
Delete^ "coo-coo!!"
DeleteYou guys, he busted out the coo coo. You know what that means. No defesne and pre meltdown
DeleteCheck the threads below, we'll soon see who has a meltdown and needs to post ten paragraphs once you do.
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha!!
it seems the aussies have their own bob heronimous running around in a suit
ReplyDeleteNo it wasn`t Bob. It was me ! And my name is Fetalbug Jones !
ReplyDeleteFetalbug Jones is the most credible voice in the bigfoot industry
DeleteWho is Fetalbug Jones?
DeleteFetalbug Jones , is a Fat little Queer, (GIRLY BOY),, now you know who Fetalbug Jones IS,, as always ,,,,,,,, BIG DORIS !!
DeleteOr ??? mkb NAW !!! dc
DeleteFetalbug Jones is definetly Girly Boy and Big Doris
DeleteCanada wins 3-0 for Gold over the Swedes! Awe yeah!
ReplyDeleteJoe, when you post as Ernie, do you sometimes beg for Canadian bacon?
Delete^ you may not have wit, humor, or intelligence, but you certainly have perseverance. And waaaay too much time on your hands.
DeleteThe Olympics don't matter.
Delete^His boyfriend's cup that is
Delete^ obsessed
DeleteOh Ernie!
DeleteAre we ready to play cat and mouse today, dragging every thread into the ground?
Now tell me, since you went for them at long sleep, what do you remember from the lessons I taught you 2 nights ago?
C'mon, don't be shy!
Joe, when you post anonymously do you sometimes watch sesame street?
DeleteYowie sighting near one of the greatest and most crowded motorsport tracks in the world. Sounds perfectly legit to me.
ReplyDeleteJoe, do you like driving people away from this site?
DeleteDoesn't know his fake Joe's for his real ones.
DeleteClueless.
Embarrassing.
Obviously a Gape-Tard.
MMG
Patty is a bloke in a suit filmed by conman. Just like Hank.
ReplyDeleteHe was quite a character, and had always been. He'd been a competitive rodeo cowboy, part-time rancher, and full-time slacker. Few who knew him had anything positive to say about him. His reputation was that he never paid his bills. He borrowed money, lied about it, and never paid it back. He was physically very strong — not an ounce of fat, and thick with muscles — and was fond of showing it off. He knew everything better than anyone, and nobody could tell him a thing. He never kept interest in one career very long. One day he'd build stagecoaches for miniature horses; the next day he'd repaint junk found at the dump and sell it. But his one saving grace was his wife Patricia. Patty had a brother in Yakima, WA, Al DeAtley, a successful asphalt contractor, who provided money whenever it was needed. It was this even keel that got Roger Patterson through.
DeleteThe story goes that Patterson and Gimlin had developed a strong interest in Bigfoot, and in October 1967 they rented the movie camera and went off on horseback for a couple weeks to look for it. Next thing they knew, they'd become the luckiest Bigfoot hunters in history, when the creature obligingly stepped out of the woods and strode across the clearing for Patterson's camera, in the early afternoon of October 20th. Gimlin chased it on horseback, lost it, but found its footprints; then they rode about 5 kilometers back to camp for their plaster of paris. They rode back, poured plaster into the footprints, waited for it to dry, then went back to camp again. They loaded their horses into the trailer and drove 40 kilometers on rough fire roads back to Willow Creek, and posted the film off to Yakima to get it developed. It was about 4:00 in the afternoon.
The glaring impossibility of this timeline is what first raised suspicions among skeptics. In response, Patterson and Gimlin began providing all sorts of different versions of their story. Other suspicious cryptozoologists, such as Peter Byrne, found holes and contradictions in those stories. In the end, the version Patterson and Gimlin settled on was that they put the film onto a plane and flew it to Yakima, where Al DeAtley picked it up to have it developed. Byrne found that the only charter planes that could have flown that route that day were all grounded due to rain and bad weather. Since then, few serious researchers took Patterson and Gimlin's story seriously.
But the film had already grown larger than all of them. It was a sensation, and to this day, rakes in revenue in licensing fees. DeAtley backed Patterson and formed Bigfoot Enterprises on November 1, just 10 days after the shoot, and reported $200,000 in the first year. Make no mistake about it: for the late 1960s and a man who used dig through the dump, Bigfoot was big money. Throughout the 1970s, Patty Patterson, Al DeAtley, Bob Gimlin, and a wildlife film company fought numerous lawsuits with one another over the rights to the footage. The biggest winner was a Bigfoot fan named Rene Dahinden, who ended up with about half of the rights, and Patty with the other half.
It was in 2004 that author Greg Long dug into this mess to sort everything out. Over a period of six years, he actually went and met face to face with all of these characters who were still alive, and many other people — anyone he could find who knew Patterson or was involved in the film in any way. His entire adventure was published in his entertaining book The Making of Bigfoot: The Inside Story.
DeleteThat wildlife film company just mentioned, American National Enterprises, turns out to have been pivotal. Patterson had been driving down to Hollywood a lot, trying to sell the idea of a pseudo-documentary about Bigfoot; based on Patterson's own self-published 1966 book Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist? Studios wouldn't bite, but ANE did. It was with their money that Patterson rented his camera and took some pre-production stills of his buddies allegedly on a Bigfoot hunt, but actually in Patterson's own backyard. They included Bob Gimlin costumed up as a native American guide. ANE's movie was to be titled Bigfoot: America's Abominable Snowman.
Bob Heironimus was a sturdy, hulking 26-year-old laborer who lived a few doors down from Bob Gimlin. One day Gimlin told Heironimus that Patterson would pay him $1000 for a day's work on a film set wearing a costume. Heironimus readily agreed; that was a lot of money. He met with the men once or twice to try on a gorilla suit and make some adjustments. Then one day, he drove down to Willow Creek. He spent the night at their camp, and the next day they shot the footage.
ANE's money had also been used to buy the gorilla suit. It came from Philip and Amy Morris, established makers of gorilla suits for carnivals. They told Greg Long that they had recognized the suit when they saw Patterson's film on television, and that Patterson had asked their advice in modifying the suit to make the arms longer. They'd even shipped him extra synthetic fur, made from a material called Dynel. They also advised him to put a football helmet and shoulder pads on the suit wearer to make him look enormous. Not surprisingly, when Greg Long asked Bob Heironimus about the suit, he also mentioned that he wore a football helmet and shoulder pads inside of it.
Bob Heironimus then went home, where his mother and two brothers also saw the suit, and waited patiently for his $1000. In accordance with his character, Patterson never paid Heironimus a dime. When he saw the film hit it big, Heironimus feared prosecution for fraud for his role in its production, and so made no further efforts to collect, nor ever spoke up about it to anyone. A groundless fear perhaps, but very real for an honest and innocent young man.
The camera store had to file charges for theft against Patterson to get him to finally return the camera. ANE lost every penny of their investment; Patterson immediately abandoned their pseudo-documentary and, in essence, stole the film clip that was rightfully their intellectual property. It was only 30 years later that Greg Long was able to piece together the entire story by talking to all of those involved. Holes still remain; for example, Al DeAtley claims to have no recollection of where or when he supposedly developed the film, or how he received it from his brother in law. The October 20 timeline is clearly impossible as given, but no evidence could be found to provide actual dates for when the film was actually shot or developed. With much credit going to Greg Long, we now have a reasonably solid reconstruction of the film's complete history, with plenty of space in the gaps to fill with anything more plausible than the Patterson-Gimlin claim of the world's luckiest Bigfoot hunt.
In 1967, Roger Patterson was a young man, only 41 years old. He was strong and exuberant — an amateur boxer known for walking on his hands on the small town's main street — too lazy to take a regular job, too much in love with his wife Patricia, and too many stars in his eyes to stick within the confines of the even the flamboyant rodeo. He was inwardly happy but outwardly grumpy, frustrated with society's conventions that expected him to be less than he wanted to be. But even at that young age, he was dying of cancer. Roger may have had a year left or five, and his thoughts were consumed with providing for his beloved wife while still being the rascal that he needed to be. When Roger put that film cartridge into his camera, it wasn't with the careful eye of a cinematographer. Nor was it with the deliberate mischief of a hoaxer. It was with the vivacity of a happy-go-lucky shortcutter, a candle doomed to burn half as long, and desperate to burn twice as bright. His thoughts were on Patricia and with squeezing in one final success, a roll of the dice, a lottery ticket. If his Bigfoot movie failed, he would die as the obscure debtor as which he'd been cut out; but if he won, he'd be the flash in the pan that he needed to be to sustain his wife and justify his years of skylarking. Roger Patterson made the gamble he needed to make. The wheel of fortune spun, and as it does every once in a great while, it made Roger the winner. It turned Bigfoot into a real monster that walked across the clearing and into legend and permanence.
DeleteJust over four years later, Roger Patterson lay in bed and drew his final breaths. The film had been a great success, and brought in a constant stream of money unlike anything he'd ever known. Patricia securely owned enough of the film rights to sustain herself. When he finally closed his eyes, Roger went to that great Bigfoot pasture in the sky, without ever having compromising the eternal youth that was in his makeup to be. He never paid his bills. He never sold hours of his life. He never put in an honest day of someone else's work. He never sacrificed his lack of principles. He never gave up being untrustworthy and living his few years on his own terms. Yet, perhaps it was that insistence on being who he was that caused his film to outlive nearly everyone else of his day. Even as a hoax, the Patterson-Gimlin film is perhaps the most honest film ever made.
-Brian Dunning
So Pgf is a hoax. I knew it.
DeleteRick Dyer + Walter White = Roger Patterson
DeleteI'm going triple meltdown on this!
DeleteI love fake Joe. He is amazing. Please have my babies.
DeleteBrian Dunning is a fraud convict. Seems legit.
DeleteJoe, when you post as Ernie, do you sometimes put big mac sauce on the balls?
DeleteWoops. Joe, when you post as Ernie, do you sometimes put Big Mac sauce on your little fellows?
DeleteSure. But you have to know that I do bad things to babies
DeleteThough I love this podcast (yes, I really do!), as I listened to it this time I couldn't help but feel that his answers to problems and refutations of issues were too facile, in the way of skeptical dismissal rather than true skeptical analysis. Yes, there is a difference, folks. Many of his points raised were actually based upon fallacies and misinformation. I re-read the transcript, cutting and pasting parts that I found to be erroneous. These are just off the top of my head, but based upon some ten years of studying the history of this film here in Willow Creek and doing extensive research in the Bluff Creek area.
DeleteSo, for what it is worth, here are the points I found troublesome. Go to the transcription page for the podcast and read the whole thing for yourself. Can you find any more problems? Are there problems with the problems I have raised? Well, post them in the comments below. Documentation of these issues surrounding Bigfoot in Bluff Creek can be very tricky, as they have found scattered publication (no, Greg Long's book is not the end-all of information), and much of it is based upon oral history here in the local area. I'm open to additions, subtractions and corrections to the following list. Thanks!
SKEPTOID PGF ERRORS:
Delete* Bob Gimlin remained silent for 25 years
* he began speaking about it in the 1990s
* The original film no longer exists (unknown)
* no record of anyone ever having possessed the original print
* The original also would have included any other shots that were taken (we do have a copy of the full film roll, with all shots)
* Patterson covered his tracks very effectively (fallacious assumption of hiding the truth not following lack of records)
* full-time slacker (he did work, on his own projects, with determination)
* Few who knew him had anything positive to say about him (FALSE)
* lied about it (evidence?)
* knew everything better than anyone, and nobody could tell him a thing (not demonstrated by the accounts of his friends)
* DeAtley ... who provided money whenever it was needed ("whenever" is not true)
* Gimlin had developed a strong interest in Bigfoot (not before 1967, and at Bluff Creek he still wasn't a believer)
* they rented the movie camera (no, only Roger did)
* went off on horseback (they drove a truck)
* creature obligingly stepped out of the woods (no, it was by the creek)
* Gimlin chased it on horseback, lost it, but found its footprints (they never saw it again, only going up the creek where they thought it went, and only found a possible water mark on a stone, not a foot print)
* 5 kilometers back to camp (slightly high)
* drove 40 kilometers on rough fire roads back to Willow Creek (not the right distance, plus much of the way was on a real paved highway, and before that they were on forest service roads, not "fire roads")
* loaded their horses into the trailer (it and horses were left in camp)
Delete* It was about 4:00 in the afternoon (NOT when they arrived in Willow Creek, but when they left the camp site... 6:15-6:30 apprx. arrival in W. Ck.)
* glaring impossibility of this timeline (NOPE, so far it is just about right, if they were quick about doing things)
* holes and contradictions in those stories. In the end, the version Patterson and Gimlin settled on (as in any telling of events, there will be inaccuracies, plus... how could they "settle" on a story if Gimlin "wasn't talking," and they always told basically the same story anyway?)
* the only charter planes that could have flown that route that day were all grounded (not necessarily true if a willing pilot had been found, and there was a break in the weather)
* Since then, few serious researchers took Patterson and Gimlin's story seriously. (MANY have)
* Throughout the 1970s, Patty Patterson, Al DeAtley, Bob Gimlin, and a wildlife film company fought numerous lawsuits with one another over the rights to the footage (DeAtley was not in lawsuits, but there was one involving Patricia and Gimlin with Rene Dahinden. They wildlife film company was sued for using the film without paying for it. That isn't the film's fault.)
* Long... met face to face with all of these characters who were still alive (NOT Gimlin, though)
Delete* American National Enterprises, turns out to have been pivotal (they were involved AFTER the film was shot)
* Patterson had been driving down to Hollywood a lot (I think three times total, not a lot)
* trying to sell the idea of a pseudo-documentary about Bigfoot (among many other projects, like his prop-lock and toy inventions, NOT just the idea of a Bigfoot film)
* based on Patterson's own self-published 1966 book Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist? (NOT REALLY, as it was a fictional docudrama thing, but the book is written as non-fiction)
* It was with their money that Patterson rented his camera (NO, it was not)
* took some pre-production stills of his buddies allegedly on a Bigfoot hunt, but actually in Patterson's own backyard (not in his backyard, but in the hills outside of Yakima, and not "allegedly," but dressed in fictional character roles)
* ANE's movie was to be titled Bigfoot: America's Abominable Snowman. (BUT, that was NOT Patterson's film, but a later production idea)
* for a day's work on a film set (a day just in driving, a day there, and a day back, PLUS, it was not a "film set" but a real wild location.
* He met with the men once or twice to try on a gorilla suit and make some adjustments (THIS MAY HAVE BEEN EARLIER THAT YEAR, as part of the docudrama project)
* Then one day, he drove down to Willow Creek (nope, that is TOO FAR, quite a ways past the film site and Bluff Creek)
* ANE's money had also been used to buy the gorilla suit.
* It came from Philip and Amy Morris, established makers of gorilla suits for carnivals. (NOT as Bob H. described it, with horse hide and such)
* they had recognized the suit when they saw Patterson's film on television (pure anecdote, plus the Morris suits are TOTALLY different)
Delete* Patterson had asked their advice in modifying the suit (not necessarily the same thing as at Bluff Creek)
* They also advised him to put a football helmet and shoulder pads on the suit wearer to make him look enormous. Not surprisingly, when Greg Long asked Bob Heironimus about the suit, he also mentioned that he wore a football helmet and shoulder pads inside of it. (Conflation FALLACY... the story about the football gear comes SOLELY from Heironimus)
* Patterson never paid Heironimus a dime (perhaps he didn't have to, if Bob H. is lying)
* nor ever spoke up about it to anyone (he bragged about it for years locally, in bars, to friends, etc.)
* ANE lost every penny of their investment (not involved)
* Patterson immediately abandoned their pseudo-documentary and, in essence, stole the film clip that was rightfully their intellectual property (TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS, the docudrama already had been abandoned)
* we now have a reasonably solid reconstruction of the film's complete history, with plenty of space in the gaps to fill (CONTRADICTORY, either it is solid or full of holes... which?)
* too lazy to take a regular job (no, he just didn't LIKE "regular" work... he was more the independent entrepreneur type)
* too much in love with his wife Patricia, and too many stars in his eyes to stick within the confines of the even the flamboyant rodeo (non sequitur in the extreme, rodeo was a part-time affair at best, and he loved his wife like any normal husband, and so what if he had big ambitions... that contradicts the "lazy" assertion)
* He was inwardly happy but outwardly grumpy (TOTAL ASSUMPTION, with no basis)
Delete* while still being the rascal that he needed to be (bizarre assertion)
* Roger may have had a year left or five, and his thoughts were consumed with providing for his beloved wife (what is wrong with that? BUT... Roger expected to live, and said so constantly, while mass-consuming health foods)
* Nor was it with the deliberate mischief of a hoaxer. (But... you just called him a hoaxer repeatedly)
* He never paid his bills. (He was an ill man, struggling to make ends meet, and he paid the bills as he could.)
* But, then you claim he is totally rich: "The film had been a great success, and brought in a constant stream of money" ... surely if this were the case he could have paid his bills.
* He never sold hours of his life. (NOT TRUE. He did work jobs here and there.)
* He never sacrificed his lack of principles. (Nonsense sentence)
* Even as a hoax, the Patterson-Gimlin film is perhaps the most honest film ever made. (Really? It is just a minute and a half of a mystery creature, saying little more than that.)
Anyway, that is all for now.
When it comes to the PGF issues, the "Hoax Theory" feeds itself with its own presumptions, just as the "Believers Camp" feeds on its own wishful thinking much of the time. That is just the way it is, sadly.
http://bigfootbooksblog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/skeptoid-botches-analysis-of-patterson.html?m=1
DeleteDestroyed!!
Oh, and just for good measure; Dunning recycled all his information about the PGF from Greg Long who had been busted hoaxing a hoax with exposed liars a long time ago. Many of the people he interviewed for his book have come forward to state he fabricated their statements.
DeletePeace!
Yes, 'bloke in a suit guy' on the Real Bigfoot Encounters thread... You got obliterated.
DeleteAnd while Joe beats off furiously to the PGF that only he cares about,
DeletePETER BYRNE IS FOUND GUILTY OF FELONY FRAUD.
Ouch.
But joe will ignore the fraud. And dont forget, Joe only knows 4 things in the world of bigfoot. Patty film, leaping russian film, sykes study, and not Mulls quotes. Thats literally all he knows. Every post will have something from those in it, or a copy and paste job. Or of course the got monkey suit line when he is truly desperate. Joe, your taking a pounding above. Got patty diaper butt?
DeleteLook at all the paragraphs. Joe definetly had a little episode today. Joe, whats it like to be destroyed by the skeptics day in and out. Getting pwned over and over and over.
Deletehttp://youtu.be/wQr922oWdgY
DeleteAwh, what's the matter silly boy, got all angwy??
Question for you... If Byrne is such a fraudulent character, why didn't he make up he saw a Bigfoot?
; )
1:56... Look at the comments regarding the subject matter, you got obliterated too easily.
DeleteTooooooooooo easy.
Joe is going into pre meltdown, he is getting defensive over Byrne. Meltdown will shortly follow
DeleteAnd in typical fashion, he is also passing his pwnings off to others like he does with his meltdowns.
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!
DeleteYou got smashed, old boy!
; )
Academy Award winning film effects supervisor and makeup artist Stan Winston, after viewing the PGF, summed it up simply as "it's a guy in a bad fur suit, sorry!" He went on to comment that the suit in the film could have been made today for "a couple hundred dollars" or "under a thousand, in that day". He also added that "if one of my colleagues created this for a movie, he would be out of business."
ReplyDeleteStan Winston needs to go to Spec savers xx
Deletetranny alert
DeleteAnd yet, for all the talk about it being a suit, even from a reputable special effects guy, no one has been able to replicate the Patterson creature. Sure we've seen some attempts but they all looked like garbage. Guess talk is cheap.
DeleteProvide a costume expert that has spent more than two seconds worth of analysis on it, it is fairly obvious Stan hadn't invested too long a process of thinking his statement through, as I'll touch on in a bit... Has Stan Winston conducted analysis on the 'suit' or just offered a lazy opinion, just like Rick Baker, Howard Berger, Dave Kindlon? All these people offered an opinion on the spot to what is regarded my the majority as a subject to ridicule, as opposed to applying thorough analysis that would be suficient to pass judgement on something that has the proportions Patty has.
DeleteYou see... This also just digs a bigger hole, because if someone like Stan can state that the costume could cost a couple of $100, then why couldn't a BBC budget manage it? Why couldn't Blevins manage it?? For someone with as big a rep, he didn't think that one out too thoroughly did he?
"If one of my colleagues created this for a movie, he would be out of business."
Well if I someone who had knocked up a monkey suit to best 46 year's worth of advances, I'd hand him a job! Ha ha ha!! Yeah, didn't apply less than two minutes thought in comparison Munns' thorough analysis, I can make that claim quite confidently with the those type of comments. Stan passed his opinion, it doesn't matter how many awards he's won in comparison to a costume expert of 30 years... If he hasn't applied his expertise appropriately, then the awardless expert wins every time, old boy. Also... I think you'll find Stan died before he could see the stabelized, digital version.
I'll say it again... Got monkey suit?
Schooled.
You can shout it, doesn't make it true.
DeleteI'd take the 'lazy' opinions of the long list of award winning and top experts in the field than the 'vested' opinion on an award less, former special effects technician that was fired from his highest profile gig over 30 years ago.
Bill Munns entire career is much less impressive than just a single year from the long list of award wining special effects masters who have called PGF a bloke in a suit.
Sorry. Repeat it and shout it to the heavens, doesn't make you right.
Joe is doing some heavy copying and pasting. You know what that means.
DeleteDid you also see where Joe posted as Ernie and then switched to his Joe account and responded to himself. How pathetic is that
DeleteUnlucky people!! Find me a costume expert that has invested more than two seconds worth of analysis, AFTER the footage has been stabelized and digitized. What you gonna do, state publicly that you think the PGF is real when you have a career to think about?
Deletehttp://www.billmunnscreaturegallery.com/bmcgsite_036.htm
In this resume you will find all the evidence to prove Bill knows what he's talking about. Like I suggested... No research, does not counter research... Again, that is the logic of a small mind. You can bring me the Jesus Christ of suit makers, if he hasn't spent more than two minutes looking at the footage, then it's pretty irrelevant to the analysis that any other expert has applied.
If the only experts in the world were that because they had own awards, then we'd have but a handful... And that's as stupid as your little minds. The following is a list of famous people who were fired at one stage...
Henry Ford
R. H. Macy
F. W. Woolworth
Soichiro Honda
Akio Morita (Sony)
Bill Gates
Harland David Sanders (KFC)
Walt Disney
Albert Einstein
Charles Darwin
Robert Goddard (rocket researcher)
Isaac Newton
Socrates
Robert Sternberg (President of APA)
Thomas Edison
Orville and Wilbur Wright
Winston Churchill
Abraham Lincoln
Oprah Winfrey
Harry S. Truman
Dick Cheney
Jerry Seinfeld
Fred Astaire
Sidney Poitier
Jeanne Moreau (actress)
Charlie Chaplin
Lucille Ball
Harrison Ford
Marilyn Monroe
Oliver Stone
Vincent Van Gogh
Emily Dickinson
Theodore Seuss Giesel (Dr. Seuss)
Charles Schulz
Steven Spielberg
Stephen King
Zane Grey
J. K. Rowling
Monet
Jack London
Louisa May Alcott
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Elvis Presley
Ludwig van Beethoven
Igor Stravinsky
The Beatles
Michael Jordan
Stan Smith
Babe Ruth
Tom Landry
... And look how many experts their are in that list.
Too easy.
Joe, you are a copy and paste hero to all the losers who live with there parents in Wales. Congrats
DeleteIt obliterated you, now shut up and sit down.
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha!!
Was that sighting at Bathurst or Buthurst? xx
ReplyDeletetranny alert
Delete^^^ DYERTARD ALERT
Delete^ MMG
DeleteNah this it MMG.
DeleteLast time I declared war on the trolls along came a certain Joe Fitz.
This time we have a certain TROLL KILLER.
Fun times ahead folks!
MMG
Nah this it MMG.
DeleteLast time I declared war on the trolls along came a certain Joe F*tz.
This time we have a certain TROLL KILLER.
Fun times ahead folks!
MMG
Bigfoot is the inkblot used in this century to characterize mental illness.
ReplyDeleteit is what it aint.
ReplyDeleteI agree with nothing you said which means everything.
DeleteOnce in a lifetime a boy can do, what no other can do. ONCE IN A LIFETIME
ReplyDeleteALL CAPS
Excellent post! I must thank you for this informative read. I hope you will post again soon.Kind regard Anti bird net manufacturers
ReplyDelete