Is This a Baby Bigfoot or Something Else?

By -

In 2009 FB/FB confirmed this as a baby Bigfoot. After seeing this breakdown, Phil believes it's something other than the legendary woodape.



Comments

  1. rushferlifeFriday, January 31, 2014 at 1:00:00 PM PST

    Something else

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFriday, January 31, 2014 at 1:06:00 PM PST

    You'll get something else and like it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFriday, January 31, 2014 at 1:07:00 PM PST

    Baby Big foots don't get to be Born. They're aborted by Obama's people! (Plan Parenthood)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousFriday, January 31, 2014 at 2:57:00 PM PST

      I agree with you on the whole baby killing thing, but do you really think the republicans would be any different?, bush was in power for eight years and wasn't going near this topic as it's political suicide. You talk as if it was oboma who legalized baby killing

      Delete
  4. UnknownFriday, January 31, 2014 at 1:09:00 PM PST

    Let's use the correct biological terminology.

    They are not 'baby' bigfoots, they are 'fun sized' bigfoots.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFriday, January 31, 2014 at 1:42:00 PM PST

    The complaint is in. I repeat the complaint is in.

    Joe Fitz

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousFriday, January 31, 2014 at 2:48:00 PM PST

    It's the rare sleeveless tree dwelling Platypus.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousFriday, January 31, 2014 at 4:56:00 PM PST

    it's a baby bigfoot owl !

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousMonday, February 3, 2014 at 8:46:00 AM PST

    Bigfoots don't have the physical make up to clime trees so fluidly like a monkey, could they are simply built far different !

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Questions of the day: Something's not right about Patty, why are the soles of her feet white?

By -
Image
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Read more

Dude Changes His Mind About Bigfoot Being An "Entertainment" After This Happened To Him...

By -
Image
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Read more

M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]

By -
Image
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Read more