Bigfoot doesn't elude modern technology it merely eludes to intrusive stupid people putting the technology up in their home. If your safety depended upon evasion, and you weren't a dumb animal with intelligence equal to us... Then you wouldn't be doing the tango where technology was around, would you? Also, I think the recent influx of thermal evidence kind of schools that notion anyway, don't you think?
I think that if you were to drop the denial and therapeutic counseling style mutterings that Bigfoot isn't real and looked at the mounds of evidence that Bigfootery has accumulated; then I think you'll find 'Bigfootery' has led to science asking the questions as opposed to successfully debunking it... Funny that, eh?
Delusional garbage. Science isn't about debunking, it's merely about examining the evidence. In this case it's an incredible lack of critical evidence and an abundance of nothing.
Truth be told, if you even had a single piece of honest to goodness, verifiable evidence then you wouldn't need to come here day after day and conjure up fancy worded pathetic and longwinded paragraphs as to why there is no actual scientific evidence.
Don't blame anything on anyone except your terrible field researchers and amatuer star gazers.
Also, go away, everyone was amazingly compatible and friendly while you're gone. First time this place was fun and entertaining in some time.
Where do amateur star gazers fit in to bigfeetery wtf at least he didn't copy and paste it and it was actually interesting to read lay off Joe man if I can forgive and forget so can you
Ahh I didn't know that I don't like MK's HD VHS videos that are mad photoshopped and I've spoken repeatedly on the video I found where he photoshopped an alligator and highways on the moon
Yeah. If you watch some old docu's, I think one is Meldrum's Legend Meets Science, MK is on it displaying his crappy star gazing programs he uses to look at patties hairy knockers.
Nope... Science should have debunked this subject by now if it had reasonable opportunity to. At what level do you have reason to back up your claims if science isn't about debunking, can you not use science as a tool to do that? In your case, science has been used embarrassingly and sporadically in attempt to debunk things like tracks for example, yet it cannot stand without an equal being put in counter action in favor of this type of evidence being legitimate.
The truth is... If you weren't so hell bent in trying to deny Bigfoot, then laughably old boy... You wouldn't be here at all. This is a Bigfoot blog for Bigfoot discussion, and if there was nothing to Bigfoot, then there wouldn't even be a Bigfoot blog. If this blog was called 'Denialists Are Us', then you could have a damn good right to tell people what to think and who is allowed around here.
Sorry... I think you will find the research accumulations of researchers in this field have put together a nice little headache for you to express denial and hate about; why else would you be here bitching at the one person you never seem to tackle about it?
Science doesn't debunk, it examines evidence. The conclusion of examining the evidence is correlated to the validity of the evidence.
Cry about debunking all you want but that's not what science is for. I could easily counter with science is about confirming and not debunking, but again that's a false bias as is your POV because it's not about confirming or debunking, it's merely examining the evidence.
In this case a severe lack of it. I you had ONE legitimate piece of critical and valid evidence then this discussion wouldn't even happen but you don't.
"Science doesn't debunk, it examines evidence. The conclusion of examining the evidence is correlated to the validity of the evidence."
Me repeating myself -
"At what level do you have reason to back up your claims if science isn't about debunking, can you not use science as a tool to do that? In your case, science has been used embarrassingly and sporadically in attempt to debunk things like tracks for example, yet it cannot stand without an equal being put in counter action in favor of this type of evidence being legitimate."
You see.. You have to deliver a reason to not consider the data as evidence, not simply deny it and request more, that's pretty embarrassing. For all your exotic word plays, you don't seem to grasp that do you?
To us, we have sources that do not have any legitimate reason to cast aside, and to you, you have 'science' doubling up as denial that does not even acknowledge those sources. That is, I think you'll find... Totally against any scientific process. If you cannot use science to debunk our sources of evidence, then we'll use it to prop it up just fine. If you cannot do anything about it then that's your problem and crying about it here won't help that old boy.
Hmmmmm, I think someone needs to grasp the understanding that science is not a process of choosing or acknowledging things, but a tool that can be applied quite sufficiently when it is practiced appropriately.
I think you are confusing the definition of derogatory with successful debating old boy. Take some of your own advice and stay out of the kitchen if it's too hot for you. You attacked me, spurting hate and denial on a Bigfoot blog.
(Sigh)
4:13...
There are so many similarities between the two subjects, it's quite eye opening when the penny drops.
Ok time for work have a good day at work people those of you who do to those who don't congratulations you should take a very deliberate very serious approach to HUMP DAY YEAAAAAAAAAH MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL
Most of those movie people are clueless on just how much (and how relatively easy) is being covered up, but that's quite common there after all even Stan Winston got it wrong on the PGF. Probably deliberately so, being on a CIA payroll presumably like so many in Hollywood. And Sorry Howell, PGF is the real thing. They'd made us another suit just like it were it fake, show me any suit that looks this much like an upright walking gorilla basically. We're yet to see anything even close to Patty, so yeah of course she's real and excellent proof of it too. Problem is, the species won't be found because they're (A) not from around here if you catch my drift, and (B) it's clearly being covered up. So to round that up, an ape we'd found ages ago and probably even a hominin so that leaves the ET/other dimension origin. Oh yes, so much scientific we're left in the dark on. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why we can't and won't find them anytime soon.
I swear footers don't even look at the film. It's a bloke in a crappy costume clear as day. No real animal would have any of those ridiculous costume traits. Clue up please.
I don't think any suit can make leg length shorter, can't make extended toes when stepping and can't make fingers that bend from arms that hand to the knees.
Watch a Bill Munns documantary and it will help you with that.
6:25 showing his limited troll intelligence, it's no animal creep it's a humanoid being of unknown kind. Go educate yourself on this and while you're at it jerkoff, show us a suit anywhere that looks anything like this. Patty is the typical bigfoot anatomy unlike anything else on Earth, you can't make' em in suits.
Hey JOE and anyone else who cares. Go to BFRO. go to blue forum, and down to Post Links to images/video here, then heading of shelter. A guy named Coop has some pretty impressive photos of a possible bigfoot shelter and also some distinct wood knocks when he entered the area near the Olympic Peninsula this December. Truly remarkable shelter, maybe the best I have seen.
Joe is clueless. There is simply no reason for anyone to think bigfoot is real as there is no verified evidence. To say without a doubt that bigfoot is real is insane. SURE you can say it MIGHT be real. Nothing wrong with that. But to talk like joe does stating it is 100% real is plain retarded.
I think you would have a difficult job staking that claim to the tens of thousands of people who have seen Sasquatches. Being 'verified' would require science to actually get on board, not stand aside and claim there is nothing to thousands of years of acknowledgment that transitions into modern mediums of accumulative evidence.
I can say without a shadow of a doubt that Bigfoot is real because their is documented biological evidence, footage, and the tooth fairy don't leave tracks. Also, I have friends with decades of experience of the wilderness that have have seen these creatures on many ocassions.
If that is your belief then excellent, but you come across so threatened and scared by preaching that. The only one coming off insane is the one so frantically trying to persuade people against something that is happening to maybe thousands every year.
FM5 at 6:15am, would like to qualify his statement that; 1. he hasn't had his coffee yet today, and 2. he doesn't watch TV, listen to the radio, read the newspaper, or read about any Bigfoot related topics on the internet, therefore he is living in a sterilized bubble and is clueless about everything related to Bigfoot. In real life, they call him BUBBLE BOY. FM5 is merely a catchy name that he thought suited his outlook on things for which he is completely unqualified to speak about.
Lots of lazy government trolls in this thread, writing crazy stuff pretending there's no bigfoot knowing full well there is it's an otherworldly being officially denied by them and science alike.
No. Insane is repeating the same behavior over and over again regardless of its useless or negative consequences. Example: Trolling a Bigfoot Blog when you don't even believe in the subject matter being discussed. It would reduce a person to endless critical negative rants. Oh. Sorry. What were you saying?
Yes. I have evidence. Physical and visual. I have about a dozen photos. Some good footprints. Some hair from snap twist cedars. 3 giant hunting dogs that sleep with me since deer season. And 12 discs if imagery I'm still perusing through. You want me to send u some?
Happy Birthday all caps. If I were there. It would be Patron all night long. In fact. I'm changing me name to TequilaForLife. Hope you celebrated with family and Friends. M
Joe. Headed to animal shelter to find an adopted home for these fellas. You Harry and ALL CAPS have a great day. It's ironic that people want to argue Bigfoot with me and I've been sleeping with hounds that hunted all their lives and now live in a condo with me cause I can't get them to go back into my car. Let alone the woods. Something scared them Joe. Have a great day!
Mike you are a saint! Those poor dogs had the fear of god put up them! It don't take a genius to work out what did that to them when you have the evidence you have along with the sightings... That's unless you're pretty damn scared yourself of course.
First your pictures were supposed to be amazing. Nothing more than bad blobsquatch photos.
You're neighbor has exotic animals..
Then you proclaim footage of the century, we're all gonna be taken aback because you're footage is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I mean it shows all these clear interactions! 300 minutes of film and 10 hours straight watching them!
Sure.
Whatever you say my well spoken southern friend, whatever you say.
I think you'll find that in at least two of Mike's pictures, you have one clear face; eyes, nose, mouth; the works... And in another you have eyes, a brow ridge and coned head. I wouldn't class those as blobsquatches, that's unless you are severely colour blind or threatened by what you see.
Mike has never proclaimed footage of the century; another one of your claims to prop up a point of view that nobody cares for. If you didn't need such things to strengthen your arguments, then you wouldn't use them.
Chuck. My man. Thanks for yor comments the other day. Dan says my pix suck. Ones being published in a book. Looks good to me. So does some footage I've got coming up. Man. Good times brother. Happy Hokidays.
And as for you Dan. You believe in Nothing Lebowski! Nothing. You should join Autobahn now. Nihilist. And to think you guys killed Donnie. For Shame Daniel. Santa is watching. I have sent your coal to Pennsylvania, Texas. Addressed to Dan Campbell. Trophy Deer Hunter and Wildlife Expert. :)
For the definitive testimonial evidence on whether Bigfoot actually exists, we can refer to a statement briefly appearing on cryptozoology.com, posted by their secret moderator, and most vocal Bigfoot skeptic, Karl Rose. He posts as "Karl" today. Late at night in 2005, Karl Rose essentially posted and then quickly deleted, "Of course Bigfoot is real ! There cannot be so many reported sightings for them to NOT be real !
Karl Rose also has current access to informatioon available through electronic telephone eavesdropping equipment, that he uses to embarass posters of opposing viewpoints. He further claims to have worked in a presumed federal penitentiary in Utah, and also claimed to be a former spook of some sort. You just can't find a more higher ranking person than one of the top 10 Bigfoot skeptics in the U.S, to state that "Of course, Bigfoot is real".
Within 15 minutes of making the above post, I received the standard harassing fax call from Brighton, CO, from the number 720-685-6282. The people who own electronic eavesdropping equipment, also have the ability to make an harassing call and have it appear as if it was coming from any number, including from the White House. Of course, they would hardly be interested in embarassing the person from which they are concealing their tactics and methods from.
1. A custom suit was made that was probably not amazing when looking at it in person but on a fuzzy grainy film looks ok.
2. Patterson, a known huckster who had already been involved in various bigfoot money making schemes, who told fantastical stories such as a 9 foot bigfoot lifting up his truck, rented a camera in order to film a bigfoot, travelled to bluff creek and happened to come accross a bigfoot, film it, first try, get the creature in the frame, get the film processed in 2 days over the weekend via airmail, and the filmed creature looked exactly like the female bigfoot he drew in his previously released book, and the creature displayed many characteristics of a man in a suit, and the suit wearer has come forward, and many contradictions in the stories by both bob g and roger and royalities still be earned by the family and nothing even remotely similar has ever been filmed or verified since.
3. Poster 7:33 was paid to come here and post about something that he does not believe in. Sane people return over and over to websites that are about subjects that they either believe in or are seeking understanding. 7:33 is neither. Therefore, he is either insane, or he is paid to come here and post his copy and paste diatribe out of a NSA database that is designed to aid Snowden type contractors in controlling how the public thinks. AKA, mind control of U.S. citizens !
Please notice the quickness of the response of 8:09 am. That person most likely has current access to electronic eavesdropping equipment and uses it without a legal warrant.
A magic monkey suit that defies the proportions of any normal human being, that trumps all technological achievements of the last 46 years with materials that weren't available to a broke cowboy amateur film maker?
Or the creature in the footage that actually has backed up opinion from a costume expert, that has tens of thousands of years of acknowledgement by natives, 150 years of documentation of biological evidence, thousands of casted tracks, tens of thousands of eye witnesses, matching specimens in other footage sources... Is actually real?
You wanna talk about contradictions? A short list of just some Bob Hilarious' contradictions:
Did you feel comfortable and natural walking in the suit?; Oh yeah it was easy. Very simple: I had to practice it several times to get it the way Roger wanted it.
The legs felt like hip boots, wading boots they went up to the waist.; They were irrigation boots about up to the knees.; Wading boots they came straight up to the hips.
I think the feet were made out of old house slippers.; They weren't no slippers. I was walking in my stocking feet inside the costume.; I was wearing shoes.
No metal parts.; It had a zipper. I had to wiggle into it kinda like a t-shirt.; It had a zipper up the back.
There were numerous more contradictions , also about the location I couldn't be bothered to dig up, purely cause I'm embarrassed that you would use such a source if I'm honest and I'm bored of it.
Oh, and the basis in which you cast Patterson in a negative light uses the same amount of hearsay and rumor that you suggest enthusiasts use, whilst you also use terribly poor logic in that because Patterson was a dedicated researcher that successfully captured the creature on footage, against him. How else would we deliver you your desired 'monkey'?
Of course, we can't go more than 2 days without Joe going full Rain Man in a thread and imploding the thread.
Look at him calling people 'tards,' 'boy,' 'numpty,' and giving himself Godlike qualities (fear of God, really?)
I'm glad he's on Ginger's watchlist. Only a matter of time before he slips up again.
PS - The header of this website says it all "allows our readers to draw their own conclusions." It doesn't say "no meanie skeptics allowed!" If you want protection to live in fantasy land, go to BFF otherwise YGNALI.
Well Daniel... Why don't you go and complain again and again and again about me eh?
We all know that's why you are resorting to 'holier than though' tactics, forgetting how you have spoken to people in recent months... It's because how can anyone listen to your complaints and pleadings for my removal when you act like a homophobe & xenophobe with a mouth like a sewer?
This is a Bigfoot blog and I'll be damned if I'll stand by as people call me delusional and request my removal for defending the subject matter.
Go cry about it Dan, you've became quite good at that lately.
Daniel Campbell, Boy! are you delusional! Your supposedly a grown man, and as longas I've been reading comments here, YOU always made the most childish, in-mature vile comments, more than any one on here!
Screw you, and have a terrible Christmas! Go back to Tennessee, with all your inbred toothless mountain hicks!.
I have been called many things in my life. Corporeal. CocAinish. Crockettesque (Sonny or Davey). But never coquettish. As soon as I find my syllabus. I will decide if I have been insulted. I'm out here trying to adopt out hunting hounds that Bigfoot has scared into rescue Pets and someone DARED to call me coquettish. Seriously. Id just like to know what it means. :)
(if ya aint got nothing good to say about someone ,you should just say nothing at all) , < that being true, I just can't help it,, mb & dc both!! are just over the top ,,, both of them seem to forget some people have GOOD memory's,,
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Exists
ReplyDeleteAnd first....
MMG
Smooth firsting MMG, like candy from a baby eh at this hour eh?
DeleteLol^ bleeves in a magic monkey man that can elude modern technology. Dumb.
DeleteThere is no bigfoot.
DeleteOnly bigfootery and bigfooters.
GOOD MORNING YOU WANKER SONS A BIATCHES HUMP DAY YEAAAAAAAAH WOOOOOO WOOOOOOO
DeleteBigfoot doesn't elude modern technology it merely eludes to intrusive stupid people putting the technology up in their home. If your safety depended upon evasion, and you weren't a dumb animal with intelligence equal to us... Then you wouldn't be doing the tango where technology was around, would you? Also, I think the recent influx of thermal evidence kind of schools that notion anyway, don't you think?
DeleteI think that if you were to drop the denial and therapeutic counseling style mutterings that Bigfoot isn't real and looked at the mounds of evidence that Bigfootery has accumulated; then I think you'll find 'Bigfootery' has led to science asking the questions as opposed to successfully debunking it... Funny that, eh?
Peace.
HA HA HA!
DeleteGood morning Harry... Your energy is inspiring for me, as I'm pretty knackered!
Peace.
Lets get the show on the road fuckers GOOD MORNING have A good day at work people 7 DAYS TILL CHRISTMAS
Delete;) ahhh I see
DeleteDid you ever get so drunk or so tired you start reading like a pirate lol
DeleteHA HA HA HA!!!
DeleteWELCOME BACK, JOE FITZ!!!
DeleteALL CAPS
How the devil are you ALL CAPS???!!!!
DeleteOh and happy birthday bro!!
DeleteDelusional garbage. Science isn't about debunking, it's merely about examining the evidence. In this case it's an incredible lack of critical evidence and an abundance of nothing.
DeleteTruth be told, if you even had a single piece of honest to goodness, verifiable evidence then you wouldn't need to come here day after day and conjure up fancy worded pathetic and longwinded paragraphs as to why there is no actual scientific evidence.
Don't blame anything on anyone except your terrible field researchers and amatuer star gazers.
Also, go away, everyone was amazingly compatible and friendly while you're gone. First time this place was fun and entertaining in some time.
Where do amateur star gazers fit in to bigfeetery wtf at least he didn't copy and paste it and it was actually interesting to read lay off Joe man if I can forgive and forget so can you
DeleteMK Davis = Amateur Star Gazer.
DeleteAll do respect Harry, it ain't about you.
Jesus forgives, not me.
Ahh I didn't know that I don't like MK's HD VHS videos that are mad photoshopped and I've spoken repeatedly on the video I found where he photoshopped an alligator and highways on the moon
DeleteBig Ginger is on the lookout for the copy pastes anyway.
DeleteYeah. If you watch some old docu's, I think one is Meldrum's Legend Meets Science, MK is on it displaying his crappy star gazing programs he uses to look at patties hairy knockers.
Delete2:53...
DeleteNope... Science should have debunked this subject by now if it had reasonable opportunity to. At what level do you have reason to back up your claims if science isn't about debunking, can you not use science as a tool to do that? In your case, science has been used embarrassingly and sporadically in attempt to debunk things like tracks for example, yet it cannot stand without an equal being put in counter action in favor of this type of evidence being legitimate.
The truth is... If you weren't so hell bent in trying to deny Bigfoot, then laughably old boy... You wouldn't be here at all. This is a Bigfoot blog for Bigfoot discussion, and if there was nothing to Bigfoot, then there wouldn't even be a Bigfoot blog. If this blog was called 'Denialists Are Us', then you could have a damn good right to tell people what to think and who is allowed around here.
Sorry... I think you will find the research accumulations of researchers in this field have put together a nice little headache for you to express denial and hate about; why else would you be here bitching at the one person you never seem to tackle about it?
Peace.
Science doesn't debunk, it examines evidence. The conclusion of examining the evidence is correlated to the validity of the evidence.
DeleteCry about debunking all you want but that's not what science is for. I could easily counter with science is about confirming and not debunking, but again that's a false bias as is your POV because it's not about confirming or debunking, it's merely examining the evidence.
In this case a severe lack of it. I you had ONE legitimate piece of critical and valid evidence then this discussion wouldn't even happen but you don't.
Exist. I've seen on, had two other encouters. Now let us move on to its culture. That is the only important manner
DeleteChuck
How about we stay on topic, which is Bigfoot Wars and this video.
DeleteIf you want in-depth and varied discussion on Bigfoot, http://www.bigfootforums.com is the place to be.
Christmas. Now that is a holiday most of us can share. Must be early, I could not even spell one
DeleteChuck
You -
Delete"Science doesn't debunk, it examines evidence. The conclusion of examining the evidence is correlated to the validity of the evidence."
Me repeating myself -
"At what level do you have reason to back up your claims if science isn't about debunking, can you not use science as a tool to do that? In your case, science has been used embarrassingly and sporadically in attempt to debunk things like tracks for example, yet it cannot stand without an equal being put in counter action in favor of this type of evidence being legitimate."
You see.. You have to deliver a reason to not consider the data as evidence, not simply deny it and request more, that's pretty embarrassing. For all your exotic word plays, you don't seem to grasp that do you?
To us, we have sources that do not have any legitimate reason to cast aside, and to you, you have 'science' doubling up as denial that does not even acknowledge those sources. That is, I think you'll find... Totally against any scientific process. If you cannot use science to debunk our sources of evidence, then we'll use it to prop it up just fine. If you cannot do anything about it then that's your problem and crying about it here won't help that old boy.
There is also http://sasquatchforum.proboards.com/
DeleteWhatever, I've got better stuff to do than sit here and try to explain how the world is spherical to a flat-earther.
DeleteJust another case of sticking your fingers in your ears and going NA NA NA NA!!
This is why people don't want to talk to you.
Hmmmmm, I think someone needs to grasp the understanding that science is not a process of choosing or acknowledging things, but a tool that can be applied quite sufficiently when it is practiced appropriately.
DeleteFlat-earther? Aptly labeled sir.
Peace.
You can't actually discuss a topic without attaching derogatory personal remarks and condescending attitude, can you?
DeleteNot a moment goes by where you can accept that most people don't view these things like you do but you're ALWAYS right.
You need to learn to respect both sides of the argument for once without all that Pedestal Joe attitude.
Bigfoots are ETs, so yeah they exist alrigh but officially riducled with denial and covered up.
DeleteJoe got fucking dominated. Fucking roasted.
Delete4:04...
DeleteI think you are confusing the definition of derogatory with successful debating old boy. Take some of your own advice and stay out of the kitchen if it's too hot for you. You attacked me, spurting hate and denial on a Bigfoot blog.
(Sigh)
4:13...
There are so many similarities between the two subjects, it's quite eye opening when the penny drops.
Peace.
Joe didnt attack anybody yall are trolls
Deletehe likes to debate, some people dont know how its sad.
They don't know how to Debate, because their IQ is so low. Joe, is a very intelligent fellow, debating against RETARD TROLLS!
DeleteJohn W. Jones Spoke
How are you John?! Hope you are well and ready for Christmas?
DeleteGood to see you post John.
Wait...someone is supposedly smart even though they constantly argue with "RETARDS"?
DeleteI'd like to know why footers are constantly making fun of those with mental disabilities.
Do you go around in public spouting off hate speech about "RETARDS" and homosexuals??
Disturbing.
anon7.07
DeleteButthurt MMG
Daniel... Shall I list the names you have used on this blog in recent times?
DeleteSuddenly you're the role model of the blog??
Oh dear...
Post them Joe.Inquiring minds need to know.
DeleteIf it doesn't have the tag it's not a legit MMG post.
DeleteLet me demonstrate....
MMG
I bet he's Stankape.
DeleteI also think he's that Milk toiletbowelson, feller.What say you?
DeleteOh I so have to get need for speed for PS4 I've had it almost 3 weeks still haven't gone to get a game
ReplyDeleteMORNING, HARRY!
DeleteALL CAPS
GOOD MORNING ALL CAPS HAPPYBIRTHDAY BUDDY
DeleteTHANK YOU, BANDINI!! APPRECIATE IT..
DeleteALL CAPS
Good Morning After..... And have a fantastic day!
Deleteneed for speed... hahahaha
DeleteForza 5 or nothin. Best racing game hands down.
Xbox One only though....
Happy birthday ALL CAPS,i wish i was 21 too xx
ReplyDelete21? I WISH!!! THANK YOU, EVA!!
DeleteALL CAPS
Your welcome ALL CAPS xx
DeleteHappy Christmas Harry xx
ReplyDeleteTo you as well EVA xxx
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAround here we just toss our dead animals in the woods. Of course we actually have woods though not just rural expanses.
DeleteWow. Awesome of you to post a link for us to comment on and then delete it. WTF Eva?
DeleteSorry 3;34 xx
DeleteOk 4;17,look forward to it xx
2;59,i know what a tree looks like,we've got at least two of those things not far from where i live xx
DeleteFucking disgusting
Delete... Is your mouth.
DeleteNice one Joe, lol xx
DeleteOk time for work have a good day at work people those of you who do to those who don't congratulations you should take a very deliberate very serious approach to HUMP DAY YEAAAAAAAAAH
ReplyDeleteMERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL
More Mindy please.
ReplyDeleteMork and Mindy or just Mindy
DeleteThat was my favorite show when I was a little boy. Nanoo Nanoo . Shozbot!
DeleteMine too man my mom would watch so my little brother and I did too then all the dreams and imagination of being an ET
DeleteOk regardless work boots and go to work have a GOOD DAY fellow bigfeeters
ReplyDeleteMost of those movie people are clueless on just how much (and how relatively easy) is being covered up, but that's quite common there after all even Stan Winston got it wrong on the PGF. Probably deliberately so, being on a CIA payroll presumably like so many in Hollywood. And Sorry Howell, PGF is the real thing. They'd made us another suit just like it were it fake, show me any suit that looks this much like an upright walking gorilla basically. We're yet to see anything even close to Patty, so yeah of course she's real and excellent proof of it too. Problem is, the species won't be found because they're (A) not from around here if you catch my drift, and (B) it's clearly being covered up. So to round that up, an ape we'd found ages ago and probably even a hominin so that leaves the ET/other dimension origin. Oh yes, so much scientific we're left in the dark on. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why we can't and won't find them anytime soon.
ReplyDeleteYou'd be surprised how many researchers are starting to turn in this direction.
DeletePeace.
I swear footers don't even look at the film. It's a bloke in a crappy costume clear as day. No real animal would have any of those ridiculous costume traits. Clue up please.
DeleteGot monkey suit??
DeleteYep plenty of suits no actual bigfoot though.
DeleteIf you haven't magic, miraculous, human proportion defying monkey suit then... Old boy... There is your 'monkey'.
DeleteSchooled.
Joe doesn't understand that human proportions can be made different by a suit. Also doesn't realise that patty has normal human proportions anyway.
DeleteI don't think any suit can make leg length shorter, can't make extended toes when stepping and can't make fingers that bend from arms that hand to the knees.
DeleteWatch a Bill Munns documantary and it will help you with that.
6:25 showing his limited troll intelligence, it's no animal creep it's a humanoid being of unknown kind. Go educate yourself on this and while you're at it jerkoff, show us a suit anywhere that looks anything like this. Patty is the typical bigfoot anatomy unlike anything else on Earth, you can't make' em in suits.
DeleteHey JOE and anyone else who cares. Go to BFRO. go to blue forum, and down to Post Links to images/video here, then heading of shelter. A guy named Coop has some pretty impressive photos of a possible bigfoot shelter and also some distinct wood knocks when he entered the area near the Olympic Peninsula this December. Truly remarkable shelter, maybe the best I have seen.
ReplyDeleteBest Chuck
Wow Chuck! Thank you for that, I'll check that out and let you know ASAP.
DeleteThank you my friend.
Got monkey?
DeleteGot monkey suit?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteJoe is clueless. There is simply no reason for anyone to think bigfoot is real as there is no verified evidence. To say without a doubt that bigfoot is real is insane. SURE you can say it MIGHT be real. Nothing wrong with that. But to talk like joe does stating it is 100% real is plain retarded.
ReplyDeleteFucking maroon 5.
I think you would have a difficult job staking that claim to the tens of thousands of people who have seen Sasquatches. Being 'verified' would require science to actually get on board, not stand aside and claim there is nothing to thousands of years of acknowledgment that transitions into modern mediums of accumulative evidence.
DeleteI can say without a shadow of a doubt that Bigfoot is real because their is documented biological evidence, footage, and the tooth fairy don't leave tracks. Also, I have friends with decades of experience of the wilderness that have have seen these creatures on many ocassions.
If that is your belief then excellent, but you come across so threatened and scared by preaching that. The only one coming off insane is the one so frantically trying to persuade people against something that is happening to maybe thousands every year.
Peace.
Enjoy never having your fantasy creature verified by science and always being wrong.
Delete...Says the neurotic case fresh from his therapy session.
DeleteKeep praying.
FM5 at 6:15am, would like to qualify his statement that; 1. he hasn't had his coffee yet today, and 2. he doesn't watch TV, listen to the radio, read the newspaper, or read about any Bigfoot related topics on the internet, therefore he is living in a sterilized bubble and is clueless about everything related to Bigfoot. In real life, they call him BUBBLE BOY. FM5 is merely a catchy name that he thought suited his outlook on things for which he is completely unqualified to speak about.
Delete^^ Butthurt MMG
DeleteIf it doesn't have the tag it's not a legit MMG post.
DeleteLet me demonstrate....
MMG
Lots of lazy government trolls in this thread, writing crazy stuff pretending there's no bigfoot knowing full well there is it's an otherworldly being officially denied by them and science alike.
DeleteNo. Insane is repeating the same behavior over and over again regardless of its useless or negative consequences. Example: Trolling a Bigfoot Blog when you don't even believe in the subject matter being discussed. It would reduce a person to endless critical negative rants. Oh. Sorry. What were you saying?
ReplyDeleteWell put up or shut up.
DeleteGot monkey?
Got monkey suit???
DeleteYes. I have evidence. Physical and visual. I have about a dozen photos. Some good footprints. Some hair from snap twist cedars. 3 giant hunting dogs that sleep with me since deer season. And 12 discs if imagery I'm still perusing through. You want me to send u some?
DeleteTHANKS JOE!!
DeleteALL CAPS
True dat.True dat.
DeleteHappy Birthday all caps. If I were there. It would be Patron all night long. In fact. I'm changing me name to TequilaForLife. Hope you celebrated with family and Friends. M
DeleteJoe. Headed to animal shelter to find an adopted home for these fellas. You Harry and ALL CAPS have a great day. It's ironic that people want to argue Bigfoot with me and I've been sleeping with hounds that hunted all their lives and now live in a condo with me cause I can't get them to go back into my car. Let alone the woods. Something scared them Joe. Have a great day!
DeleteMike you are a saint! Those poor dogs had the fear of god put up them! It don't take a genius to work out what did that to them when you have the evidence you have along with the sightings... That's unless you're pretty damn scared yourself of course.
DeletePeace
Which these Tards clearly are!
DeleteMaybe the dogs just like the coquettish look you have when you're sleeping.
Deletecoquettish.....? I reckon that you said that by experience......
DeleteYGNALI
DeleteYou have nothing Lebowski.
First your pictures were supposed to be amazing. Nothing more than bad blobsquatch photos.
You're neighbor has exotic animals..
Then you proclaim footage of the century, we're all gonna be taken aback because you're footage is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I mean it shows all these clear interactions! 300 minutes of film and 10 hours straight watching them!
Sure.
Whatever you say my well spoken southern friend, whatever you say.
I think you'll find that in at least two of Mike's pictures, you have one clear face; eyes, nose, mouth; the works... And in another you have eyes, a brow ridge and coned head. I wouldn't class those as blobsquatches, that's unless you are severely colour blind or threatened by what you see.
DeleteMike has never proclaimed footage of the century; another one of your claims to prop up a point of view that nobody cares for. If you didn't need such things to strengthen your arguments, then you wouldn't use them.
I'm not going to argue with you today. You aren't worth the energy and I'm not giving you any gratification.
DeleteThe pictures SUCK, that is all.
But hey, feel free to call me a RETARD and make fun of gay people since you fellas seem to be so damn good at it.
DeleteBuncha hate mongers.
You be careful that someone doesn't anonymously post the links where you have used the worst language possible Danny Boy.
DeleteDan you know that the 'Skeptard' comment is in retaliation of the 'Foot-tard' that you Einstein's came up with.
DeleteDan we don't forget your behavior on here in past months so this angelic crap isn't washing with anyone.
Posting a picture of your private parts on blog where kids visit could have landed you in jail.
I hate Tards.
I hate 'Action-Taking' Jrefers even more.
MMG
Butthurt MMG ^
DeleteButthurt your hero got owned today ^
DeleteButthurt pseudofooter who likes to have the last word ^
DeleteBigfoot is nothing.
ReplyDeleteNothing is bigfoot.
Joe is maroon.
'Nothing' would be between those ears of yours old boy.
DeleteSchooled.
^^ Thinks that saying "Schooled" means that he's actually able to school someone
Delete^ schooled.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGot monkey?there he is at 6;50 xx
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA!!
DeleteAmbiguous.
DeleteJeeper Eva. Don't insult a monkey.
DeleteChuck
Your right Chuck,apologies to all monkeys xx
DeleteChuck. My man. Thanks for yor comments the other day. Dan says my pix suck. Ones being published in a book. Looks good to me. So does some footage I've got coming up. Man. Good times brother. Happy Hokidays.
DeleteAnd as for you Dan. You believe in Nothing Lebowski! Nothing. You should join Autobahn now. Nihilist. And to think you guys killed Donnie. For Shame Daniel. Santa is watching. I have sent your coal to Pennsylvania, Texas. Addressed to Dan Campbell. Trophy Deer Hunter and Wildlife Expert. :)
DeleteOr was that Coyote, Tennesse. Can't remember.
DeleteI think it was Testicle,Tennessee.
DeleteFor the definitive testimonial evidence on whether Bigfoot actually exists, we can refer to a statement briefly appearing on cryptozoology.com, posted by their secret moderator, and most vocal Bigfoot skeptic, Karl Rose. He posts as "Karl" today. Late at night in 2005, Karl Rose essentially posted and then quickly deleted, "Of course Bigfoot is real ! There cannot be so many reported sightings for them to NOT be real !
ReplyDeleteKarl Rose also has current access to informatioon available through electronic telephone eavesdropping equipment, that he uses to embarass posters of opposing viewpoints. He further claims to have worked in a presumed federal penitentiary in Utah, and also claimed to be a former spook of some sort. You just can't find a more higher ranking person than one of the top 10 Bigfoot skeptics in the U.S, to state that "Of course, Bigfoot is real".
Within 15 minutes of making the above post, I received the standard harassing fax call from Brighton, CO, from the number 720-685-6282. The people who own electronic eavesdropping equipment, also have the ability to make an harassing call and have it appear as if it was coming from any number, including from the White House. Of course, they would hardly be interested in embarassing the person from which they are concealing their tactics and methods from.
DeleteWhat's more likely?
ReplyDelete1. A custom suit was made that was probably not amazing when looking at it in person but on a fuzzy grainy film looks ok.
2. Patterson, a known huckster who had already been involved in various bigfoot money making schemes, who told fantastical stories such as a 9 foot bigfoot lifting up his truck, rented a camera in order to film a bigfoot, travelled to bluff creek and happened to come accross a bigfoot, film it, first try, get the creature in the frame, get the film processed in 2 days over the weekend via airmail, and the filmed creature looked exactly like the female bigfoot he drew in his previously released book, and the creature displayed many characteristics of a man in a suit, and the suit wearer has come forward, and many contradictions in the stories by both bob g and roger and royalities still be earned by the family and nothing even remotely similar has ever been filmed or verified since.
Hmmm seems to be tricky one!!!
3. Poster 7:33 was paid to come here and post about something that he does not believe in. Sane people return over and over to websites that are about subjects that they either believe in or are seeking understanding. 7:33 is neither. Therefore, he is either insane, or he is paid to come here and post his copy and paste diatribe out of a NSA database that is designed to aid Snowden type contractors in controlling how the public thinks. AKA, mind control of U.S. citizens !
DeleteLoony^
DeletePlease notice the quickness of the response of 8:09 am. That person most likely has current access to electronic eavesdropping equipment and uses it without a legal warrant.
Delete7:33... What's more likely?
DeleteA magic monkey suit that defies the proportions of any normal human being, that trumps all technological achievements of the last 46 years with materials that weren't available to a broke cowboy amateur film maker?
Or the creature in the footage that actually has backed up opinion from a costume expert, that has tens of thousands of years of acknowledgement by natives, 150 years of documentation of biological evidence, thousands of casted tracks, tens of thousands of eye witnesses, matching specimens in other footage sources... Is actually real?
You wanna talk about contradictions? A short list of just some Bob Hilarious' contradictions:
Did you feel comfortable and natural walking in the suit?; Oh yeah it was easy. Very simple: I had to practice it several times to get it the way Roger wanted it.
The legs felt like hip boots, wading boots they went up to the waist.; They were irrigation boots about up to the knees.; Wading boots they came straight up to the hips.
I think the feet were made out of old house slippers.; They weren't no slippers.
I was walking in my stocking feet inside the costume.; I was wearing shoes.
No metal parts.; It had a zipper.
I had to wiggle into it kinda like a t-shirt.; It had a zipper up the back.
There were numerous more contradictions , also about the location I couldn't be bothered to dig up, purely cause I'm embarrassed that you would use such a source if I'm honest and I'm bored of it.
Oh, and the basis in which you cast Patterson in a negative light uses the same amount of hearsay and rumor that you suggest enthusiasts use, whilst you also use terribly poor logic in that because Patterson was a dedicated researcher that successfully captured the creature on footage, against him. How else would we deliver you your desired 'monkey'?
Schooled.
Of course, we can't go more than 2 days without Joe going full Rain Man in a thread and imploding the thread.
ReplyDeleteLook at him calling people 'tards,' 'boy,' 'numpty,' and giving himself Godlike qualities (fear of God, really?)
I'm glad he's on Ginger's watchlist. Only a matter of time before he slips up again.
PS - The header of this website says it all "allows our readers to draw their own conclusions." It doesn't say "no meanie skeptics allowed!" If you want protection to live in fantasy land, go to BFF otherwise YGNALI.
Here's Daniel Campbell's logic, as HE sees it.
DeleteI have a large "Farm Pond' about 4 acres in size. (Spring fed) It's loaded with fish, especially Big mouth Bass.
People go fishing there all the time, and usually have very good luck catching 4 Lb.+ Bass.
A Daniel Campbell type guy, goes there, fishes all day, and catches nothing!
So his conclusion is, since he didn't catch anything, there are no fish in this pond. They don't exist!
John W. Jones Spoke
You know nothing of which you speak.
DeleteNuh uh!
DeleteWell Daniel... Why don't you go and complain again and again and again about me eh?
DeleteWe all know that's why you are resorting to 'holier than though' tactics, forgetting how you have spoken to people in recent months... It's because how can anyone listen to your complaints and pleadings for my removal when you act like a homophobe & xenophobe with a mouth like a sewer?
This is a Bigfoot blog and I'll be damned if I'll stand by as people call me delusional and request my removal for defending the subject matter.
Go cry about it Dan, you've became quite good at that lately.
Last I checked, I've been incredibly civil and entertaining for months. I'm not the argumentative jerk in these situations with a bad attitude.
DeleteWe just had 2 days go by without incident, suddenly you and Mike show up and this place went to hell.
That only says one thing.
As you Daniel. Except for showing you scrotum.Seems like you have that down to a t'.
DeleteThe only one crying is you Danny Boy, and the 'NA NA NA' guy who always gets served.
DeleteFunny that?
Put a complaint in Dan, I've done nothing wrong.
DAMNIT MAN Daniel has seen the light.And maybe just maybe he will apologize to Eva.What about it Daniel?
DeleteExactly! And Danny Boy wants to judge people on their conduct around here?
Delete(Sigh)
That would be nice xx
DeleteIt's not going to happen Eva.I will apologize for Daniel. Daniel is so sorry that he picked on you.
DeleteDaniel Campbell, Boy! are you delusional! Your supposedly a grown man, and as longas I've been reading comments here, YOU always made the most childish, in-mature vile comments, more than any one on here!
DeleteScrew you, and have a terrible Christmas! Go back to Tennessee, with all your inbred toothless mountain hicks!.
Thank you Dan. You do speak for a lot of us. This place was awesome when Joe was gone.
DeleteDaniel Campbell is one of the most argumentative jerks on here! Your a liar and a phony!
DeleteWhat's this obsession with Joe? He offers intelligent insight to a lot of comments, both pro and con. He has WAY MORE friends on this site than you.
I'm surprised that Shawn hasn't banned you yet. Your vile comments really stink this site way up! Ball Boy!
Daniel sure did disappear when he was called out on his homophobia comments. What's a matter Daniel, cat got your tongue?
DeleteYeah this place was awesome....
DeleteWe had 4 trolling skeptards posting trite one liners.
Yeah. This place was awesome....
MMG
I have been incredibly civil. Handsome. Coquettish and stylish for the time it took to try to get Joe Banned. Dan Campbell :).
DeleteButthurt MMG^
DeleteGOOD MORNING TEXAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteGood Morning Anon. Could you please post the definition of coquettish. I thought it was cheese toast!!!
DeleteMichael K Brookreson has Smoked!
DeleteI have been called many things in my life. Corporeal. CocAinish. Crockettesque (Sonny or Davey). But never coquettish. As soon as I find my syllabus. I will decide if I have been insulted. I'm out here trying to adopt out hunting hounds that Bigfoot has scared into rescue Pets and someone DARED to call me coquettish. Seriously. Id just like to know what it means. :)
DeleteI need the How Dare You guy to step in!
DeleteI, blah,,,,,,, blah, ME! blah blah,,,, I , blah, ME,blah., ME ,,,I blah, ME ,,blah ,,,ect,,,, me, ,,I Milk toiletbowelson . has spoken,,
DeleteAt the limits of your creativity it seems... And intelligence.
Deleteit seem you dont get it???
Deletein other words ,your loyalty is admirable however,anon109 was being sarcastic in regards to mb's ,,, ,narcissistic (me at all cost) type post's .
Delete(if ya aint got nothing good to say about someone ,you should just say nothing at all) , < that being true, I just can't help it,, mb & dc both!! are just over the top ,,, both of them seem to forget some people have GOOD memory's,,
DeleteI keep my head in a glass case.
ReplyDeleteNo, you keep your head up your Ass!
Deletebacon + bullets + rifle + scope = bigfoot.......
ReplyDeleteI see Michael Merchant is sporting the no sleeves look now to show off his tatoos.
ReplyDeleteMatt Hausmann's ..............
ReplyDeleteWe just had r 4 th bf sighting in 2nd year of research wow! That was the biggest one yet we figured 8'7" after looking at the thermal from 67 yards
ReplyDelete