Oh Wow. Sasquatch Ontario Is Now Communicating With Bigfoots "Telepathically"
If you're looking for something that will blow your mind this evening, check out this conversation between a YouTube commenter named Jim D. and Bigfoot habituator Sasquatch Ontario. It's unreal:
Jim D.: Mike do you feel that you can communicate telepathically with Nep, and if so what have you asked him (or them) and has there been any replies? Now the reason I ask this is because a woman called Coast To Coast and said that she spent some weeks in a cave with them and that they communicated with her telepathically.
Reply ·
Sasquatch Ontario: "I think so but it's one sided at this stage. There's been many instances of situations that pertained to telepathic communications (one sided) but to date I've personally not had any blatant activity although there has been a few questionable instances. I believe it's just a matter of time."
Another merry first!
ReplyDeleteWake me up when he gives birth to bigfoots love child.
DeleteCongrats! your TROLL footprint is the envy of sasquatch around the world.
DeleteAs a telepath I believe him.
ReplyDeleteShameful stuff even for footery
ReplyDeleteThe only science ever directed at the PGF has always, always pointed at one conclusion, that Patty was most likely a human. The Stanford group that did a proportion analysis and gait analysis concluded with no ambiguity that Patty's proportions were human. Not ape, not ape-like, but human proportions. They did their computerized dot to dot analysis on the limbs and body (spine) length, and determined that Patty was normal human proportions. Those weren't just sciency people, they were true science professionals using professional science tools. Science, not pseudo-science. They determined that Patty's gait was not at all inhuman. They used the term, "slam dunk". The only true photogrammetry study, and the only complete lens issue study, concluded that a 25mm lens was used and that Patty was 5 1/2 feet tall. These two studies, performed and produced by field professionals, have solid, unambiguous conclusions.
ReplyDeleteWhen people say let the professionals sort it out, or science proves something, are they being honest, or just giving lip service in order to reject what they don't want to hear? It's like people getting all up for supporting Bill's photogrammetry project as long as it suggests that Patty will come out to be a big mountain beast, but when the results come back as 5 1/2 feet tall, with a shorter gait than the tracks showed, oops, let's rail against the science, science is once again the bad guy. Science is the bad guy only as long as it has hopes of proving bigfoot real, or Patty real, but as soon as it goes south, they turn on it and bash science.One reason I am disappointed in this paper is because it is not scientific, it is completely subjective. It shows only an opinion, that opinion is and always has been that Patty was a real bigfoot. The one part of the whole research done that does has a chance of being taken seriously as science is the photogrammetry, yet it has been abandoned because of the results, not because of anything else. The one scientific part of the Munns Report study is the one that is not getting a scientific paper written. Don't you think that is kind of ironic? Avoiding writing a scientific paper on the one scientific part of the whole research project, and writing a variety of papers on the least scientific, most subjective aspects of the study?
This exactly. Bill has excluded all quantifiable variables needed to suport his bullshit.
DeleteAll he has left is his opinion wrapped up in a blanket of fake science and backslapping from delusional people who piss on doorknobs and mindspeak but cant get a photo.
Merry fucking Christmas
BIGFOOTERY IS THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF SCIENCE
Deletethat was funny!!! ^
DeleteIt is also highly offensive.
DeleteI didn't read the long blabbing post by the OP but it contains the familiar tired arguments we have dealt with before.
Thanks for typing all that shit out but no one really gives a shit what you think.
MMG
How many bigfoots you seen MMG?
DeleteNone.
DeleteWon't pretend otherwise.
I'm very open to the possibility of their existence based on the evidence I've seen/heard.
MMG
Liar!
DeleteStanford had the PG film in 1968, and could not render any conclusion because they had had no prior experience with any Bigfoot scientific studies. On the other hand, University of California at Berkeley, waited for someone to ask them to authenticate the film because virtually their entire scientific staff had participated in captivity studies at nearby Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories in the early 60's. Nobody ever asked U.C. Berkeley, but high ranking staff members like Professor Raymond Clough, stated in 1975 that they would have authenticated the subject in the PG film as a genuine Bigfoot. This was partly because Eric Beckjord impersonated the owner of the copy of the film, and walked off with it from Stanford. He then kept it. The other part is that few people outside of the bay area, knew that U.C. Berkeley had studied live Bigfoot in captivity, so a certain Yakima cowboy had no idea which was to appropriate institution to seek authentication from.
"The University of California at Berkeley had studied live Bigfoot in captivity.
DeleteWhen are they releasing data ?
2 weeks from the next rainbow.
Delete5 1/2 feet tall, oh God! Sure, that explains the obvious massiveness in the turn and stumble, the slo mo effect which only great mass can impart.
DeleteYou are indeed a Brite Wun.
#twerktard approved
We need some replacement skeptards.
We are dealing with de-brained drones here.
Your comment about the Stanford group, is a bunch of crap and as far as human ratios go, that's crap as well. As a biologist with a major in anthropology (specializing in primates) I can say without a doubt, the subject is not human at all and fits in more with the pre-human apes. Science is not denying the possible existence of Sasquatch, nor have we said there could never be another bipedal primate and as a matter of fact, the numbers support the possibilities of there being another bipedal nonhuman primate.
Delete"pre human apes" says the "biologist".... wrong on both claims, but funny
Deletelol
DeleteAnon 5:33 -
Delete"The Stanford group that did a proportion analysis and gait analysis concluded with no ambiguity that Patty's proportions were human. Not ape, not ape-like, but human proportions."
The subject used in the Stanford analyisis is obviously not Patty and is an actor who, in the opinion of the researchers present; has an 'conclusively accurate' gate to Patty. Dr James Gamble gives two clear examples himself however of the unnatural style the subject in the footage has in comparing to the actor used:
"He (the actor) won't be able to achieve foot clearance by bringing the foot up."
"As the trunk is flexed or is leaning forward, this creature (on the basis of the difficulty & style of the actor and what he would be able to achieve) will not be able to walk all day in the upright position."
Furthermore, you can see for yourself on the monitor with measured markings of comparison to Patty; the actor is close... But no match. What we have here is a conclusion based on closely re-enacted similarities, and is not good science as far as the footage goes when considering the counter arguments for them. So, if we are to believe the conclusions of Stanford, are we to not believe the subject in PGF is a Bigfoot based on reasoning that the actor used would have issue with maintaining the gate of the subject and that the gate replicated was 'close'? This is something mainstream science does so well in looking for closure; again... Not good science. But that is just as far as the gate in concerned.
When Bill Munns compares the proportions of Patty to a normal human; we see something very obvious in the junction of two points of the right leg when pasted on top of eachother, from the hip socket. It is here where you have an amazing example of the posture of the upper and lower leg of Patty; the upper leg is far shorter. The crotch area of Patty is far more higher than the average human norm and like Bill States; "when you put a costume on, it always adds, it never subtracts". If you were to put the 'costume' on a human being, then we would expect the crotch area to be lower than what is clearly not the case when comparing the proportions. The arm length of Patty is 10% longer than that of a normal human in comparison proportion & scale, the 10% being in the shoulder area. When matching this over that of a normal human, the problem is evident when trying to accommodate this in comparison to a normal human, Patty's knees fall way shorter. Bill even extends this to show the possibility of using football shoulder pads, and it still cannot match the proportions of a normal human. Bill also extends the comparison image's scale of Patty by 25% , but you still have the arm with bending fingers reaching far lower than the proportions of what a normal human can achieve in a suit. The shoulder joint and base of the neck of Patty require to be shifted forward actually into the neck of a normal human for the eyes of the 'mask' to align with normal human proportions. It is therefore impossible to get the mask to fit on the shoulders of a normal human and maintain the rest of the proportions to fit on a normal person in a suit.
DeleteThe Anon -
"... but when the results come back as 5 1/2 feet tall, with a shorter gait than the tracks showed, oops, let's rail against the science..."
Bill Munns -
"I would like to clarify my concerns about the "foot as ruler" technique often used to try and calculate the PGF subject height.
I do not endorse any attempt thus far because I feel that all variables haven’t been properly accounted for, and a reliable analysis should account for those variables. This is a generalized description of concerns, since the foot as ruler method has been attempted many times by various people, using varying degrees of consideration in their analysis. The body angle relative to camera - Knowing this angle is a factor in determining length of all body parts which are bent or angled in some way, because those bends and angles must be corrected for to determine a standing erect height."
Anon -
"One reason I am disappointed in this paper is because it is not scientific, it is completely subjective."
I think you will find that to when looking at the facts, it would be hard to not be subjective, as the only other alternative is to be skeptical, and since the true meaning if the term is missused every day, then to suggest that anything else is 'subjective' is pretty much the biggest joke of the day.
Your long winded denial, fails to to explain how they created/fashioned such a PERFECT bigfoot suit in the year of:
Delete1967
1967
1967
1967
1967
OMG! I think I'm falling n love with Harry B!
ReplyDeleteBall Boy
Get a hold of yourself! You fall for every McCheesey-come-lately!
Deletejealous much? ^
DeleteNo- have teenage daughters
Deletewhats is this tall hairy man you speak of? can thallest answer me this. where can i find said creature? are we talking about the little white furry things with the cheese fixation and women standing on tables screaming in early sixties sitcoms?"
ReplyDeleteIt's Christmas Day.
ReplyDeleteNever has the 2 Troll Anons ever been so active.
Speaks volumes.
MMG
The trolls are lonely onChristmas day
DeleteIf by troll you mean Joe, then yes. Dude posted every 5 minutes for 15 hours straight on Christmas Day.
DeleteRidiculous.
Sasquatch Ontaterhole is the only thing keeping Dr. Dolittle Johnson from being crowned champ chump of the year.
ReplyDelete2014 - this rivalry could get serious...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteEvening MMG.
ReplyDeleteHey Clive.
DeleteHope you guys are having a great Christmas!
Best of regards to you and your family.
MMG
Clive just took off his pants.
Delete2014
ReplyDelete"The Year of the Squatch"
Oh wait, that's been every year since 1967, when a couple of rodeo sideshow clowns pawned degenerate schmucks called footers.
Lunacy has been rampant ever since.
Happy New Year, you bunch of dildo jockeys!
^^^Absolutely rippingly 100% unadulterated #twerktard approved.
DeleteNow if only Mayor McCheese would show up, you could pick up your Golden Idiot Statuette from him.
You might as well get in the queue now.
I want to thank all of the degenerate footards here on Bigfoot Evidence who gave me the inspiration to deliver a verbal body slam like that. Without them, it wouldn't have been possible.
DeleteDildo Jockeys.
DeleteThat I do like. Lol!
MMG
I think McCheese is still here, he just chooses not to participate fro some reason.
DeleteI came here for the Squatch and all I got was this lousy turd sandwich. Merry Christmas.
ReplyDeleteChew it well or you will choke!
DeleteSup guys. Hope you had a Merry Christmas! I was throwing up all day yesterday and felt pretty lousy today. Think I got some bad peanut butter. Anyway, what's with Amazon guaranteeing two-day and one-day delivery and totally sucking at following through? Being stuck in this hole I have to buy my gifts on Amazon, and I've had it with them and their henchmen UPS, who decide to blow off delivering on Christmas Eve whenever they feel like it. Aren't they like the modern Santa? They should send trucks out all night. Yeah, it's Christmas, but that's what you signed up for. Want a lucrative contract with Amazon? Get my stuff here in time for Christmas you babies. Well I hope you enjoy returning all the crap you're delivering tomorrow, jerkoffs. I don't do day-after gifts. When you decided you were done trying yesterday at 2:30 in the afternoon, I had to send Sara out to the all-night CVS replacing choice presents with coin sorters and memory-foam slippers. You suck, Amazon and UPS.
ReplyDeleteRant over. It's not easy being stuck in a hole throwing up on Christmas Eve. Derek said he liked his Jesse James pocket watch but I just don't know.
So sorry to hear about your bad day Floor Bigfoot. :( Listen, you really need to stay away from ol Dr. Js gifting buckets. Sometimes he goes cheap and digs expired peanut butter jars out of the dumpster behind the Big Lots.
DeleteHow am I to know? He did send me a nice Harry & David gift bucket but I should have suspected something when the peanut butter jars had crusty lids and someone had already helped themselves to the highly-desirable "first" knifeful.
DeleteUmm hmm, thats what I am sayin'. He's shifty.
DeleteCrusty lids? Hmmm...
DeleteI always include meth in my baskets.
DeleteUPS came out with a message today saying that they are running behind because of higher demand and crappy weather.
DeleteMy nephew from Illinois says Uncle Eddie share some of my bottle,what do you have there Mike,a good man and recent veteran,bless him.Its spiced rum uncle Eddie,let's share a nice Christmas drink.All is good in the universe this day
ReplyDelete"Take a bottle drink it down, pass it around, a take a bottle drink it down then pass it a......pass it a round"
ReplyDeletethis is what bad acid in 2013 or drinking from hairy nipples do to you .
ReplyDeletehaven't they heard of cell phones? Even bigfoot has a special plan from telus with no roaming charges.
Get with the times Sasquatch Ontario !
How else would you communicate with Bigfoot?
ReplyDeletetree knocks
DeleteGreat video Mike...thanks for sharing! Love the Orb pics. If anyone would like to see our Orb and paranormal photos, we have a site called http://www.benevolentspirits.com/ Thank you and enjoy!
ReplyDeleteEvery body makes fun of this guy, but in reality he has done more field research than Joe Fartz ever will, and actually makes more sense than King Numpty Joe too.
ReplyDeleteorb activity ?
ReplyDeleteHow about try falling snow
What a bunch of morons !
I only watched this video, for a few seconds, and couldn't take it any more! Oh Brother! 0
ReplyDeleteI have to admit, Big footing is/has sunk to the lowest point. It just can't go any lower!
Joe! Help us!
Lower? Oh God, you think it's bad now? Wait until the Internet lets complete idiots post photos of....wait.
DeleteOrb snow
ReplyDelete