Watch this: Biker Chased by Bigfoot in Ontario Canada [The Bigfoot Case Files]
Here's a brand new episode of The Bigfoot Case Files Episode 4: "Bigfoot Biker in Belleville".
While relieving himself in the woods after a long day of dirt bike riding, a man is grabbed and chased by a 10 foot tall hair-covered creature. Was it the legendary Sasquatch of Canada?
FIRST - hey THREE firsts for the newcomer!
ReplyDeleteI bet your mother will be proud. Just think you can tell her you had three "firsts" on the Bigfoot Evidence Blog, which despite it's name doesn't really present any.
DeleteLOL - yes, she would certainly marvel on how far I have come. It seems like this is a time honored tradition here and I just couldn't pass up the opportunity when it arose. Frankly I come here for the humor which seems to be abundance from both the skeptics and believers.
DeleteAnd yet another loser falls into the mix... May your life be filled with firsts. No run, frolic in the new found glory. Carry the tail of your great " 3 first day ". Wear your FUCKING LOSER proudly my friend.... For today, you are a fucking loser.... Good for you.... Insert gulf clap!
DeleteAnd yet another loser falls into the mix... May your life be filled with firsts. No run, frolic in the new found glory. Carry the tail of your great " 3 first day ". Wear your FUCKING LOSER proudly my friend.... For today, you are a fucking loser.... Good for you.... Insert gulf clap!
DeleteThis message is for Joe which is a continuation of a lower thread which apparently has maxed out at 205 posts so lets begin:
ReplyDeleteLOL - well I guess you told me! Look, I simply came on here asking if you knew where any of these giant skeletons could be found and according to you they are locked up in some Smithsonian vault somewhere. You can't prove that they are there and I can't prove (at least to you) that they are not so it's probably pointless to continue with this line of discussion.
You state that the people in the Bigfoot files had very little problem with the results of the DNA sequencing. Here are some direct quotes taken from the second episode of those involving the bigfoot samples:
"This is hogwash".
"I just can't let it go".
"This is stupid".
"I just have to prove it".
"This sucks".
"I'LL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES".
Sounds like more than disappointment to me. You think I am lying that when I say I hope Mr. Brookreson is successful. Quite the contrary as I was once a passionate believer such as yourself however after waiting over 45 years for my belief to be vindicated I have come to the realization that it just may NOT exist. Yes, I know - tracks, dermal ridges, pictures and so on. I do know this - NEVER underestimate the human ingenuity for fooling someone. All I have ever asked was something physical that one can actually touch and examine however it's always blurry pictures, old stories, howls in the distance, tracks that lead to nowhere and so on. With all the stories coming in daily on this very site wouldn't you think over the past 50 years armed with the technology we now possess that we could gather the proof by now? Since none of you ever directly answered about your religion I assume I hit a sensitive area and I apologize however I was curious about it. Quite frankly my life will go on either way - bigfoot existing or not. It seems you have quite the zeal in insisting bigfoot exists - may I ask why it is so important to you to devote time in writing replies to those who ridicule you daily here knowing full well you will never change their mind nor they yours? For the record I do not consider those who believe bad or stupid people - I'm just puzzled what keeps them so confident after so many disappointments such as the Ketchum paper and now Dr. Sykes DNA results. I understand that Dr. Sykes after examining Khwit's skull floated the idea that it seemed to have several rather primitive features and perhaps his and Zana's line out of Africa wasn't a modern one related to the Ottomans but was instead an ancient migration, and one whose last descendants have taken refuge in the Caucasian Mountains. I am of the opinion that Dr. Sykes being a kind man and recognizing the disappointment in his findings offered this as a consolation prize to those who so wanted it to be otherwise.
In conclusion I have no desire to continue to debate the issue as I simply don't have the time and what is the point as I have said before nothing can at this point change minds except for a body for the skeptics and perhaps time (as it did for me) for the believers. I will now let you get back to the "schooling" and "pwning" of the skeptics. Good luck (I mean it) in your quest for proof of bigfoot's existence - I fear you may have a long wait.
Mr Curious...
DeleteI meant absolutely no offense in the world and I would very, very, very much like to communicate to you that if only there were more productively skeptical thinkers like you frequenting this blog, then the place would benefit. I would like to communicate further that I hope you frequent this place as often as possible. Your points of view and things that you have brought up are essential to the self evaluating scientific mechanism that is essential for any field of research and if I am honest, I love bing kept on my toes and getting into things... That is me, I just love this stuff. I meant no offense, have in recent days very much looked forward to your posts, and would like to again offer my sincere apologies.
I understand you may be a busy person, but know that you have a friend in me sir, and would like you to continue your visits to the blog and lend your views,l whenever possible, which are very important.
Much respect Mr Curious.
Stop you're shuckin and jiven
DeleteWOW! FIRST IT WAS JOE AGAINST DANIEL NOW CURIOUS IS IN......LOOK OUT JOE.
DeleteThe Curios Case of Pushing Joes Buttons. Mr Curious.....I'm a little speculative myself. Lemme ask you something. Ever heard the phrase "it takes a thief to catch a thief. ". Well in my experience its true. The best cops and lawyers I ever saw had an outlaw streak in them. They were bad apples. And could therefore attribute motive to their subjects from a more real perspective than any other person. Because they SHARED said same. I am a wild human. When I move up a mountain I use the surrounding vegetation. I run through the woods at night face first into cedar trees chasing them. I urinate on their tree snaps. I will hood wink them with children's laughter in the day where they sleep and they return the favor be freaking me out with their shrill hyena monkey chatter laugh at night. I'm close man. Because there are babies here. They try to keep the big males run out. That in turn makes the juveniles bold and brazen. And there's one that thinks I'm his Buddy. Hell I am. So I'll say no offense to your lifetime of chasing these creatures. If you'll excuse my unconventional habit of going full monkey on em. I know of no other way. Eventually the large male will put a stop to this back and forth. I believe he will bluff charge or show himself to me to frighten me away. When he does I aim to film him. Until he does I will continue my "friendly encriachments". Furthermore I will continue to collect physical evidence. When you see other people try, like with Sykes and Ketchum, you may argue they failed. Not me. Those brace souls took risks. Like yourself there's no failure there. Only determination. In that regard. You will not find me lacking. I'm headed to the woods now M Curious. Have a nice day.
DeleteCurious,
DeleteI was just like you. I came on here reading the posts and comments. I used to believe in Bigfoot until I started needing real proof of its existence. Listening to the believers you would think that there is proof that a giant ape beast really is roaming around North America eating peanut butter sandwiches and spying on humanity from behind the trees. But the fact is there is zero scientific proof. The only giant bones ever dug up anywhere were smaller than the tallest living human today. Google it. There is a great article on the national geographic website. They studied tumors in the bones and found evidence of gigantic ism however they were awfully short giants. Just tall for the time period.
I believe in God but cannot prove his existence. I have faith in Him.
I too wish that these hard core believers would just admit that they have faith in BF based on eyewitness accounts because that is the only thing they have. There is no proof. None. It would be cool to discover that bf is out there but sadly, it's going to take a body to do it. What I have discovered reading these comments is that the believers here have it backwards. They refuse to be logical and accept that the burden of proof is always on the believer, not the skeptic. It is just retarded to think it the other way around. Like I've mentioned before, thousands of people for hundreds of years have reported sightings and visitations from the Virgin Mary. That obviously doesn't make it true. But if its proof enough for believers in Bigfoot then this crypto supernatural world would be over run with giant apes, sea monsters in lakes, aliens and Jesus' kin folk and angels. If you can't prove it with science, then you just can't prove it.
Excuse the spelling errors....but the woods are dark and deep and I've miles to go before I sleep....
DeleteChristopher. All I can say to that is I was born in MO. The Show Me state. Should you choose to come to Texas. And if you heard what I heard Friday night. You would likely re affiliate yourself with religion real quick once the hyena laughter starts. And you tell yourself there's no African Hyenas or Chimpanzees in Texas. It's easier to just pray than argue with your own brain anyway. M
DeleteSometimes you just have to pick the corn kernels out of the poop.
DeleteIndeed. As my Jedi Mentor once taught me. It's best to put it....in a jar.
DeleteMike there is a more logical explanation for any sounds your hearing. I've known people that were afraid to go outside at night because they had never heard a whipperwill before.
DeleteChristopher. I was raised in the Ozarks. I've hunted quail, pheasant Chukkar and Grouse. Dove, Turkey and Ducks and Geese. I was with 2 adult men. They jumped up too. I have no problem with your logic. Nor could I change your belief save one way. Join me at night in the woods. Let the humans sleep. I will show you. That we are not alone. M
DeleteThese white and red hairs I'm collecting aren't from my pretty pony. He doesn't snap twist cedar trees while he's spying on humans. M
DeleteChris... So your point is that Bigfooters should just admit they have nothing but faith as opposed to real evidence? Just because that is your aesthetic, then it is not your place to suggest anyone else should do that, especially when there is plenty of physical clues as to the legitimacy of this creature. When you come on here and claim that the evidence is not there because you are too ignorant to acknowledge it, then I am going to express how I feel... This is the beautie of a discussion blog.
DeleteI have posted here in recent weeks, inumerable accounts of giant skeletal remains being dug up all over your country. Some of these are archeological and anthropological studies that have been documented in some of the most credible places of the day. This, when putting it together with other accumulative sources of evidence, especially in light of recent days where Sr Bryan Sykes has theorised that Zana was a relic hominid from the same time period as these bones being documented, is in fact extremely compelling, but to then compare this subject to faith based religion is quite offensive to me.
Gigantism is very rare, you would have to explain whole burial mounds, that were repeatedly found uncovering hundreds of skeletons around the country before your theory of mere gigantism washes with me. It is in fact, a much greater leap of faith to assume that hundreds accounts of burial mounds are not real, as it is to merely look at the facts and documented accounts that are staring you in the face as real.
So you know what I think it is? I think that because you have an example now of biological evidence being found that it rattles your belief system, that's all.
Peace.
Africans. Pyramids. Bronze and Mounds. Joe. Can you feel it's related. To an earlier migration. Africa has a history of tall peoples. Hmmmmm. Email me. M
DeleteWell, perhaps you will actually prove that he is out there. It would be neat if you did.
DeleteChris, why don't you go with Mike on an outing?
DeletePeace.
Chris... What is your interpretation of all these documents, which are everywhere, that have documented these remains? Hoaxed?
DeletePeace.
Yesterday Joe. I was right there with Tzieth. Chasing mammoths across Beringea with Neanderthal and "others". Today I have come out of Egypt with an ancient migration of mound and pyramid builders. A tall and hairy folk living side by side with modern cousins freely or enslaved I do not know. When the Natives Arrived they admitted others were already here. Who or what came with them. I do not know. Something IS laughing Joe. But it's laughing at me now. Would that it were laughing WITH me. M
DeleteLook... You have pyramids in the America's with legends of giants and pyramids in Africa with legends of giants, and as it is theorised; a land mass in between prior to the Atlantic shelf collapsing.
DeleteHmmmmmmmmmm????????
Ok. Joe. You bastard. I will bite. If I go back and look at the possibility of a Lazarus Taxa. A reappearance In the fossil record of a group of individuals than what am I looking for specifically. A sub Saharan co existing genus Homo cousin that was enslaved and used for power and stamina? That could have literally escaped the enslavement after a migration period? Or a bipedal gorilla whose. 4th metatarsal indicates a genetic predisposition to bipedalism. We know what Krantz felt, wide jawbone and all. What has Sykes' footnote said and what am I chasing. It appears my own tail perhaps. M
DeleteIf Zana is human. And yet had all the described characteristics of a Sasquatch. Well. Then. A sub Saharan one at that. Then fuck it. I'll just say it before Sykes. I am chasing a relic population of the former through the Texas Hillcountry Canyon Rims at night. And the irony is that the climate is very similar. And the high fence ranch next door has exotic African species that they no doubt intermingled with and preyed upon. Hmmmmm. Appears Meryl Streep and Robert Redford werent the only hominids to come.....Out of Africa.
DeleteCurious... A final note...
DeleteTo compare this subject to leprechauns and then claim that you were once an enthusiast leaves me scratching my head a little? Surely you would have known that you were going to get a particular type of reaction to that type of comment? In 50 years, people have been looking for a bipedal gorilla that isn't there. Why is it that in the last 15 years, with the development of the internet so that research groups are linked, that in all of science's advances, that we have still not debunked Bigfoot... We actually now have serious major scientists asking major questions... Why is that??
The last thing I will say, is these, except for two...
"This is hogwash".
"I just can't let it go".
"This is stupid".
"I just have to prove it".
"This sucks".
"I'LL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES".
... Appear to be statements of either expression of disappointment or intent to persevere
in research, as opposed to not accepting the results.
Like I said... You are welcome around here anytime as I would do anything to have more skeptical points of view of that calibre, as opposed to... Well... Just take a look down below.
Peace.
"In 50 years, people have been looking for a bipedal gorilla that isn't there."
DeleteJoe fitz acknowledging bigfoot don't exist
Lots of talk and speculation, still a 100% lack of physical evidence. That's the only evidence that matters, the physical and repeatable kind.
DeleteNot to PJ though, all he needs is a good story, an old myths and monsters guidebook, and an Internet connection. Bigfoot is real to him damnit!
Mike, your talking about hyena cackling and chimpanzee stuff like it's out of place yet a couple posts later you clearly mention a high fence exotic African animal refuge....
That may explain all your crazy noises and possibly "sightings." Seriously though, if you have a couple wild African animals sneaking around I'd be more concerned with that than bigfoot.
Taterjoe
Dear TaterJoe, The phrase "I science" has led to a belief system whereby the keeping of pet Hyenas or Chimps for the kiddies to feed is expressly verboten. For the very real problem that is evident that said kiddies and adults would be little more than food themselves. Science. It blinded Thomas Dolby .....take care TaterJoe.
DeleteStop with the cryptic double speak.
DeleteBe there an exotic animal 'farm' or the like nearby?
Yes or no.
If not, what's with the lie or at least gross misrepresentation?
Physical and repeatable evidence like relic hominid DNA, eh Crampz? Don't wish, you may get; post Sykes long term study.
DeleteWow, aren't you lucky I welched!!
You do realize, for the ten thousandth time, that Zana was 100% modern homo sapien sapien?
DeleteThat is not a relict hominid.
As a matter of fact, we have nothing to actually suggest these legends passed down about her are nothing but gross exaggerations, local perception, shame, and racism.
100% modern homo sapien sapien.
Now, had those DNA results came back non homo sapien sapien, you may be right. But all you are doing is taking an unproven e thought and regurgitating it as fact.
Take that Zana result to any scientific forum or organization and start babbling about hairy relict hominids and see how far that gets you.
Lie? Yes. They have a zebra and a Kuudu, hardly the stuff of legend Daniel. But you may feed them a pellet if you wish. Are you picturing me now, like Owen Wilson. Doing a bad "Cacaaaa" out my window? You know better Daniek. I Am the Lazarus Taxa. I Am the reemergence. Tomorrow you will awake and your beer and snacks and a great deal of you higher quality pot will be missing. Did you ever purchase it to begin with. You are asking the wrong questions. As Merlin said to Morgana in John Boorman's "Excalibur". "Look into the eyes of the Dragon and despair........"
DeletePwned.
DeleteAnd surely you believe in divergence and diversity even amongst modern humans. In their more ancient forms. Could the not co evolve. You are shutting off windows before the good air gets in......now breathe. Ignore that smell. Some guy came through last night and ate all the food and smoked the....wait a minute ............:)
DeleteDaniel, Daniel, Daniel;
DeleteSykes...
"Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"
Unusual features of Kwits skull -
*very wide eye sockets
*elevated brow ridge
*extra bone in neck
*all these would suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins
Zana's description...
Zana was described her as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws . Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately.
Daniel, Daniel, Daniel... Aren't you lucky I 'welched'?
"*all these would suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins"
DeleteEXCEPT THE DNA RESULTS WERE 100% MODERN HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN.
Those anomalies are well within the disparity of human development. Especially considering the 100% modern human DNA result.
You are truly dumber than a sack of rocks.
Zana was also supposedly 7 feet tall, and covered in reddish hair. Some kind of rock-clacking superwoman.
DeletePeople can cry homo sapiens sapiens all they like. Eyewitnesses aren't checking DNA. They are reporting visuals, descriptions. None of us can help if here DNA says modern human. If she were here, look at her. She won't look modern human. The DNA may say it, but she won't look it, or act it.
Seven feet tall, covered in hair, with super strength? So what if her DNA says home sapiens sapiens? So what? Who cares? If she were here, look at her, then look at your DNA results, then look back at her.
So what? Look at her. Modern human? DNA or your lying eyes? Modern human? And if she was from a tribe of hair covered huge hominids, primitives, who all tested as having modern human DNA, but your "lying eyes" tell you differently, then what?
Are you going to put Patty in a dress and send her to market? If Patty tested as homo sapien sapien, then what? Your eyes show you that she's not. Look at her. She's not. DNA says so, but look at her. Your eyes and the DNA don't agree. So what? That means there is more to learn about DNA. The descriptions of Zana don't sound too far off from Patty.
Also people are conveniently forgetting that Zana's sone then was homo sapiens sapiens, yet possessed a brow ridge, oversized and overspaced eye sockets, and an extra skull bone, all primitive traits.
There is your proof, scientific proof: The son was a homo sapien sapien, but carried primitive traits. It's right in front of you. Computer says DNA modern human, OK. But look at the skull.
And the mother, more primitive traits. Skeptards keep skipping things. They are habitual skippers. Sykes' second theory is that Zana was an archaic African homo sapiens.
It's funny how the skeptards keep skipping that in comment after comment, post after post, day after day.
According to Rhettman Mullis BTW:
The show only purchased the rights to reveal 12 results. There are more than that still yet to reveal and the contributors have been notified by email, but they are not supposed to reveal their conclusions until the paper is published.
Perhaps more results then in the Nat Geo special, but anyway, more results to come in Sykes' paper, and book. Skeptards think the fat lady has sung, but the fat lady hasn't even gotten out of bed yet.
Curious and the rest of the bloggers. So with all the sightings etc, I guess it is to hard to believe scientists at large are the real problem. I need no dead body like many of you who are shrinking to that morbid want. While your all at odds with Joe, there have been many more sitings here on Vancouver Island. So say what you will and believe what you want, these beings have and continue to out smart scientists and many of the closeminded folk. Belief or believing is not the issue it is those that think people lie like themselves regarding this subject. By the way they are not related to the polar bear either.
DeleteCurious,
DeleteI tried to answer you on the Jackson County Missouri Bigfoot thread, but my posts kept getting deleted. (I don't think it was admin as no admin message popped up. This happens from time to time.)
First off.. I am probably the biggest skeptic on here.. But not about Bigfoot. I grew up with the story's of my family members sightings, and in the case of my mother, mistaken identity was not possible.. It walked right up on her and her friends in the middle of a clearing. It got close enough to my mother to grab her. So "How can it exist?" was never my question. "Why does it exist?" was..
You asked me if I was religious. Is this because I do not believe in Macro Evolution? The fact is that I do not have a problem with the theory of Macro Evolution. I think it is a good theory, but there lies the problem I have with it. It's ONLY a theory. Yet the modern scientific community is trying to imply that it is a fact. Biology, Anthropology, Palaeontology and now modern genetics use this theory as a foundation and I feel that is folly. (Don't get me started on Astronomy or History)
Am I religious?.. Oh I used to be big-time. But my skepticism knew no boundaries so I started Fine-tooth-coming my own religion as well. Though I will keep Christian Philosophy, I no longer believe in the Bible. I think the Bible may have some good historic facts in it, but I also think there is a mountain of BS in it. (I won't go there.) But I will admit that I was a much happier person when I believed... As of now, I am agnostic.
Daniel keeps asking Joe to prove this "Unknown DNA." and that was a can of worms I did not want to open. BOTH are right. If you try to look up Sasquatch or even unknown DNA attributed to Sasquatch you will find ziltch! However, if you look up old news feeds, you will see when this unknown DNA was found and how it was sent to this or that Lab. The tests come back "Inconclusive" or "contaminated." This is not possible!!!! There IS a cover up. My background is in Law Enforcement. When there are problems with DNA in a criminal case, the problem is "Who", not "What". You can know that test sample is a human as opposed to canine, feline, avian, or fish even if it is contaminated. "What individual human it belongs to." is the problem. If we can solve 20 year old murders with 20 year old DNA, we can't figure out that a sample is "Unknown"? Actually we can and we do.. It's when that sample goes from what ever little diagnostic company it came from to "The Experts" that is gets dubbed "Non-Viable", "Tainted", or "inconclusive."
Modern Science is no different from 14th Century science. Both are biased to their respected religions.
(14th century-This does not support Creation! Throw it out and burn that guy for heresy)
(Modern-This does not support Evolution!! Throw it out and make sure the guy is blackballed from all scientific journals!... friggen crack-pot)
Use your skepticism towards your own education, and you will quickly see all the miss-matches. You will also see the agenda and bias. (There should be no biases in science.)
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deletesorry, I had to edit lol (Used "no" instead of "Know")
Delete-Repasted-
Now... This may piss off you guys who believe or know Sasquatch exist, but before you put all your eggs in Sykes basket, you need to know that he has an agenda. Go back and look at what put him on the map. While your doing so, know that he himself is not without controversy.
Then look at what he said about Zana.
While you do this and figure out that he has an agenda, know that he is doing all this testing with his own creation which is not immune to scrutiny.
P.S. Last I checked, Melba did not have her own T.V. Show.. just saying lol
True Skeptics.. listen up and I will explain why your talking points (That were passed down to you from other "skeptics") are moot.
DeleteSince Curious seems to be an encyclopedia of common naysayer views, I will use his points as an example.
"Yes, I know - tracks, dermal ridges, pictures and so on. I do know this - NEVER underestimate the human ingenuity for fooling someone."
You can make fake tracks, but you cannot make fake prints. You can strap a cut out of a huge foot and stomp around the woods all you want. A camper will see these tracks and be like "Oh crap!!! I got to get out of here!" A hunter or professional tracjer will see them and say "Hey look! some moron was here stomping on the ground with fake cut out feet." And actual "Bigfoot researcher" or lets say "enthusiast" will come to the same conclusion for different reasons. Fake feet make fake prints. Aside from the obvious: "Wow a 150lbs creature made a 14" footprint!", there are the technicalities. Fake feet do not behave like real feet. If a guy with one leg walked barefoot in sand, a tracker could tell which foot is real and which foot is a prosthetic dermal ridges aside. The prosthetic will make a stamp, the true foot with make an impresion as it rolls through the step. It will show how and where and when weight was distributed and how the bones rolled through the step. The fatty tissue in the foot will create a gradual slope from the bottom of the foot, up to the original top surface layer. A fake foot will create steep walls even if it is rounded like a prosthetic.
Common hoaxer know nothing of "Bigfoot" elaborate ones such as Rick Dyer do, but elaborate hoaxers ALWAYS want the press. They spend a great deal of time setting up their hoax, so they will not go off to a location where no one is likely to find the print, unless they know that someone will be there.
Most hoaxers are pranksters so they make a lot of uneducated mistakes, the biggest one is using cut-outs of large HUMAN shaped feet complete with arch-instep and they walk like a human walks. (Sasquatch have no arch and walk with on foot almost directly in front of the other.) In fact a little detail that both skeptics and believers alike seem to miss, is that "Patty" is actually doing this in the Patterson Video. Dermal ridges are not what says "This print is real" as they do not always show up.. they are just icing on the cake and can tell you if the prints were made by the same individual.
"All I have ever asked was something physical that one can actually touch and examine however it's always blurry pictures, old stories, howls in the distance, tracks that lead to nowhere and so on."
hair IS collected. we DO have DNA and as I said before, true prints can not be faked.
You have trained trackers finding this stuff. The samples are sent to say;Veterinarian who also cannot identify the hair or stool. This is where the media gets involved. Then the samples are sent to an "Expert" who most likely grew up in the suburbs, never left the city much less whatever University or firm they work at then says "This is a horse or Bear" because this guy knows more due to his books, than the tracker does or the Vet who both live and work out in the field and actually apply their trades.. Or the sample is too degraded or contaminated.
"With all the stories coming in daily on this very site wouldn't you think over the past 50 years armed with the technology we now possess that we could gather the proof by now?"
The same technology that found Osama Binladen?.. Oh wait.. that was word of mouth by an informant.. errm the technology that catches drug runners, sex/human traffickers and illegal aliens coming over our boarders? Or the Technology that finds the huge marijuana growing operations in the middle of the forest.. once in a BLUE MOON while most go unnoticed?.. That technology???
Good one Tzieth, You make very valid statements, wish I could be a sceptic too. My live siting was some time ago; yet, I have ran into too many that have witnessed these creatures. I also heard of a fella being followed while on his motorbike. He was having problems with his carb; guess he was able to only ride about 20 mph and something in the forest was crashing through the forest along side him. He was on a small island off of Vancouver island; Gabriola island. So sceptis scep all you want they all aren't deep in the forests and they are curious too.
Deletejustin was concerned with the boot not the bear he had tested at trent university last year.
ReplyDeleteHey joe check out the bigfoot books blog for complete and utter destruction of ketchums study by a real scientist.
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad that most posts here are on topic.
ReplyDeleteIt's just Joe getting smoked day in day out
DeleteIts a Saturday night special. Gotta barrel thats blue and cold. Ain't good for nuthun cept put a Squatch 6 feet in a hole.
ReplyDeleteTwo Feets they come a creepin, like a black Hair-do, and two bodies layin naked, Creeper think he got nothin to lose, So he Creeps up to the house and unlocks the door, and as a mans reaching for his trousers, he fills him full of .44s, Mr Saturday Night, a, Special, ya gotta barrel that's blue and cold, ya ain't good for nothin, but put a man six feet in a hole
DeleteSent you an email Mike. Like to hear what is going on. Also found link to the one video of a grassman search I was on, where we found a most interesting ambush blind and an X marking 100 yards away used with 40 to 50 foot tall trees that had to dragged or carried there as there we no stumps around and the tree bases were broken not cut. I could not determine the weight of each tree but it was above 500 pounds each easily, possibly over a thousand pounds each. I would send it to Joe also if I had his email.
DeleteWould like to meet those ancient pyramid builders. I doubt they are who the anthropologist think they are.
Chuck
Question for Mike and Joe--have you guys ever had a girlfriend? i ask this because if I was a strapping young man, I wouldn't be spending my time at BE. I would be on babe patrol 24/7.
DeleteChuck!
DeleteMike will give you my email address bro!
Peace.
That is an excellent point. If I don't stop now. I will have passed my own point of reproduction and recovery. Perhaps some day in the future. A modern blonde green eyed man will read my work and summarize it thusly......."what a fucking dork....bet he never got laid". Hence the phrase Lazarus Taxa. Hopefully re emergent Mike will get more play. I will work on that. My promise.
DeleteWe all know why we are here. It is clear what needs to be done.
ReplyDelete^??? Build a pyramid?
Delete7:43. Maybe. Or just a pyramid scam. But first 7:43, do you science? :)
Deletethere are not that many sightings in that area so if it was a bigfoot it could have been travelling through the area to up north
ReplyDeleteIs it possible to cream pie oneself?
ReplyDeleteSure, just ask Daniel.
DeleteJoe fitz it's the Canadian guy we r wondering what would be the best way to make money if we wanted to release one of are videos ??? Thanks for any suggestions ! Have a good day joe f
ReplyDeleteTrolling Joe. Joe has know idea cause he has his head up his taterhole.
DeleteThat's a tough one bro... I can ask a few people if you like? I'm assuming you mean; 'the surest way of securing money and rights?'
DeletePeace.
17,5000 the number of the smoked
ReplyDelete23 years!!!!
DeleteOh no, the number of smoked skeptards is greater than that. How many adherents does the JREF have?
DeleteHey Joe I read some stuff about the pyramids actually being made by aliens and there is proof they could have been used as power plants due to metal residues found inside! There is even drawings of batterys that they used! Very interesting stuff I would love to hear your thoughts joe.
ReplyDeleteEhheh
Delete"Is such a thing even possible? Yes it is."
And the answer is a resounding yes
DeleteNot an extinction event but infact an extermination event
DeleteAncient assonauts
DeleteThere are tool markings on all sorts of ancient monuments. Either we've had help on the way (aliens perceived as gods) or we have had advanced civilisations that have come and gone over a for longer time period than we realize.
DeleteWhatever the scenario; an amazing thought.
Peace.
Are you sure those are the only possible scenarios joe?
DeleteWell I understand I can be completely wrong... But they are the two I would think likely. Your thoughts???
DeleteHumans. 100% human with no extraterrestrial or giant help. Humans built said megaliths. All of them.
DeleteHumans, then with mysterious extraordinary technology. Coral Castle, Florida, example.
Delete^
DeleteNot really, Iv'e been there. It just outside Homestead. It's been blown way out of proportion. Simple block and tackle and other tools that have similar relations on how pyramids were built.
Mike Brookerson, are you claiming that you have Bigfoots on your property in Central Texas?
ReplyDeleteI recommend janice Carter she is the most prominent bigfoot habituater in the world. Fox used to come in and watch tv with her on a Saturday evening.
DeleteAlso there is alot of excellent information on the habituation thread on the bff. The key researcher there sasfooty even found some poop in her garden. I don't think anyone is doubting her credibility.
Remember you have to be chosen. If you go outside with anything on your person that could prove they are there they WILL know about it and not show themselves.
Remember folks: truth not proof!
Ah yes, Janice Carter Coy..."the Jane Goodall of Sasquatch" according to Dr. Igor B.
DeleteI actually went to Carter Farm back in 2004 and did some investigating. Talked to neighbors and people that knew them. I found nothing that could lend any credence to Janice's story and plenty that did not. It was all conjured up in Janice's mind in my opinion and how Igor Bourtsev could reportedly spend 3 weeks there is beyond me. Perhaps Janice was a good cook.
DeleteThe pattingson gremlin film pwns you all
ReplyDeleteThe BFF IS FULL OF CUNTS.
ReplyDeleteThat's what he get's for riding one of those devil cycles in the woods, environmental terrorists, all of them! And all the good I'm trying to do in buying a Prius an all!
ReplyDeleteCheap , refurbished , used , discount Dell laptops available here in cheap prices with good specs
ReplyDeletehttp://electrocomputerwarehouse.com
cheapcheapcomputers.com/