Watch: Bigfoot Files Episode 3 Finding Russia's Almasty
Watch this episode 3 of The Bigfoot Files before it disappears. The 'Almasty' is Russia's very own Bigfoot. It has been written about for over 300 years, and Russia's Almasty hunters claim there have been over 10,000 encounters over the years. Through DNA, Dr. Bryan Sykes finally reveals the true origin of Zana.
First
ReplyDeleteAgain no freakin Video!!!'
DeleteWhere is BIGFOOTOLOGY with all their claims of inside Sykes-study knowledge? Knowledge of what? Nothing special.
ReplyDeleteThat's most likely cos they're full of shit :)
DeleteEXACTLY. Oh, we have special inside information. We can't share it with you, but we can tell you it's world-changing stuff. You will just have to wait. Yeah, right.
DeleteRhetman Mullet?
DeleteBigfootologymobile?
No wonder this field is laughed at.
No wonder you're laughed at.
DeleteExcuse me while I fall down laughing at you.
Why do so many people who are SO SURE Bigfoot is not real continue to visit this site?
DeleteStop trolling you all wouldnt be here if you didnt believe. Its pathetic
^ I've asked the same question. Removing anonymous postings would rid those idiots. They seem to be just a few morons who no matter what u say they are negative . The only reason you follow a site you don't believe in is considered a mental problem.
DeleteHEY GUYS, MONEYMAKER IS COMING! YOU'LL GET SCHOOLED!!! HAHAHAH
ReplyDeleteVROOOOOOOOM VROOOM VROOOM
- Joe Sfitzgureld
Shitfitzgerald?
DeleteFucking pwned.
ReplyDelete^^^^^^^^#TwerkTard approved
DeleteActually, one step closer to proving the existence of bigfoot to be exact.
ReplyDeleteYes... "one step closer"...
DeleteIts always one step closer and never the final step... sound familiar?
Yea same old story for the last 50 years and it is playing out EXACTLY how it would for a creature that doesn't exist. To the book.
2011 the year of the sasquatch
2012 the year of the sasquatch
2013 the year of the sasquatch
Zzzzzz
Its time to use some critical thinking skills folks and force yourself away from what you want to believe and instead use that brain you have to figure out what the bigfoot phenomenon is all about.
We can meerly offer guidance. That final leap to escape is something you have to make yourself.
Good luck.
Here's what I'm merely suggesting. The years. 2-3000. The Millenia of the Undiscovered Hominid. Remember. You Are Sasquatch. :(
DeleteZana Theory 2 via Sykes, yes it's a step closer, perhaps many steps closer. You seem unaware of Theory 2. That rather damages your claims of "critical thinking" there Johnson.
DeleteOh, and "good luck."
DeleteHow do you expose a cover-up. Sometimes is has to come from within ala Snowden, because it's difficult to break it from the outside.
DeleteWhy do so many people who are SO SURE Bigfoot is not real continue to visit this site?
DeleteStop trolling you all wouldnt be here if you didnt believe. Its pathetic
I come here just to see the believers get hammered (and boy do they ever). It's just good fun and cheap entertainment.
DeleteHey tard, how is commng here day after day repeating the same stupid lines, hammering anyone. You fucking tards have a third grade mentality so you think your winning.
DeleteI've seen one, don't give a fuck what you , Sykes or anybody thinks.
Just what is it you would have all us bigfooters do. Believe our eyes, or some ignorant ANONYPUSS DOUBTER?????
FUCK OFF 11:11
YOU FUCKING ANONYPUSS'S ARE THE WORLDS BIGGEST LOOSERS
If what you think is true and were all crazy, than you all are just trying to bully people with hanicapps right. Which on anybodies scorecard ----- would make you-all first class pieces of shit!!!
The DNA shows she was HUMAN. I fail to see how this evidence gets us closer to proving bigfoot. Worse, the DNA evidence just destroyed one of the most interesting stories of bigfoot lore.
DeleteIf you want to make the racist argument that she's not human, go for it.
If you are sitting on the fence I would recommend reading posts on the bff by dwa, mulder, sweati yeti and sasfooty. There is no way you will think bigfoot is real after reading their posts.
ReplyDelete^they are the true masters in this field
Delete^^^^Two Jayrefers "taking action" after getting pumped up at The Big Meeting.
DeleteDeluded.
How . . . HOW DARE YOU!
DeleteGood morning ladies have a good day at work
ReplyDeleteLooks like the Almasty is Russia's own black slave who may have been retarded,
ReplyDeleteDo you really need to mention retarded? Couldn't we just lump them all under mentally challenged?
DeleteDaniel. The phrase retarded black slave is offensive to some people. Try sticking to adjectives that are politically correct. Like "dumb ass cracker":
DeleteHarry and Daniel. WTF up??
DeleteIs that guy holding Billy Zane's skull prepared to teach me anything. Is it like the late Phil Hartmans "Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer?"
DeleteAwww, poor little victim of persecution Mike Brookreson. We may have our anonymous hate spewer.
DeleteGo away mb! Only 4 people miss you.
DeleteAs usual the moderator is more elusive then bigfoot !!
DeleteGo away Mikey--it was so nice around here when you were gone. Live up to the bet you lost.
DeleteMikey, don't WELSH on your bet.
DeleteScram.
Zana Theory Number 2 re Sykes means Mike B didn't lose the bet and does not have to leave.
DeleteSkeptard Tunnel Vision at it's best.
#TwerkTard approved
Ready Yeti: The DNA shows she was HUMAN. I don't care when her family showed up in Russia as a "relic Human" from an early migration or a captured slave. She's still Human and offers no proof of a Russian bigfoot known as an almasty
DeleteIf you want to make the racist argument that she's not human, go for it.
Since the Welsh are best known for their coal mining skills is their favorite song Coal Miners Daughter or Big Bad John?
ReplyDeleteThey like Steve Earle and Ferlin Husky. But if you wanna trap one out on the Cars Candy-O. Works every time.
DeleteOf course I love Big bad John song the most!
DeleteFive a.m. and 3 has already been removed. Dambit
ReplyDeleteSometimes you just have to pack up and leave.
DeleteIs Shawn moderating now. I've been gone a while?
ReplyDeleteYep.Some racist assclown was spewing hatred yesterday.
DeleteHey Bigdad, lets not go putting lables on people.
DeleteThe racist label or the assclown label?I seem to like the assclown label the best.It describes me to a tee.
DeleteNo the racist is still here! Watching, waiting.
DeleteAlrighty then.
DeleteNotice how Mike has set his alibi that he has been away..Suspect# 1. He is DC's friend.
DeleteHey Mike. Good to have you back. Anything new going on at the ranch?
ReplyDeleteChuck
Hey Mike. Not good to have you back.
DeleteI just looked at what M K Davis had on this site last night. Seemed pretty interesting in his enhancement as it seemed a little one was next to the big one and reaching up and I wondered how this was missed. So I went to the you tube of Josh Highcliff as it is a better video, and concentrated only on the little one. What I see is another opening in a smaller cypress tree that is dark. As Josh moves around to get a better shot there is a leaf on a tree inbetween them that becomes blended into the blowup of the smaller opening that goes up and down and is not a hand at all.
ReplyDeleteChuck
Nope its a single bloke in a suit with a tree through the moddle.
Deleteye i was always going with single guy in suit with a twig moving.typical MK nonsense. putting things there that arent. you blow up and pixilate anything to make it look like something eventualy
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Delete^Last night?
DeleteHow do you know the bloke isn't married?
DeleteThis bloke in a suit guy has simply got to go.
What say we give him the old heave-ho?
MK Davis has a terrible diet, I think he is trying to kill me!
ReplyDelete-MK Davis' underpants
crap missed it, i wanted to some more of Joes slavebearfoots
ReplyDeletehttp://kickass.to/bigfoot-files-s01e03-480p-hdtv-x264-msd-t8123108.html
ReplyDeleteA very curious gentleman suggested to me yesterday that he found it hard to differentiate between the hoaxes of the 19th century and the documented archeological and anthropological studies that yielded giant skeletal remains. Here are the only hoaxed cases that I could find, and in comparison to the highly detailed accounts that I have been referencing, I think you'll agree are almost non-comparable;
ReplyDelete*Piltdown Man - Was from the UK and not the United States and was used to falsify a claim of evolution to benefit a short term career.
*The Cardiff Giant - was the creation of a New York tobacconist named George Hull. Hull, an atheist, decided to create the giant after an argument at a Methodist revival meeting about the passage in Genesis 6:4
*The Fiji Mermaid - Non-comparable but I just brought this up to show how little examples there are.
Peace.
Beyond medical help^
DeleteScared of the truth^
Delete..That was me Joe..I thought it possible that the Cardiff Giant was part of some 19th century fad centered around giant humans..If there was such a fad, it follows at least some of the newspapers accounts about these digs are hoaxes. If that is so, it would be hard to tell which are plausible and which are tabloid lies...It seems this Hull had a completely different agenda independent of the digs...Thanks for the response...
DeleteThank you for your comment. It's the type that is conducive.
DeletePeace.
..No problem...
DeleteDamn, MMG, Joe, & co. got absolutely obliterated. Legend pwn.
ReplyDeleteZana don't debunk Bigfoot dummy... Let me know when you accomplish that.
DeleteSchooled.
True. There is nothing to debunk.
DeleteNo bigfoot in itself debunks bigfoot.
Put a body on a table now that's something to be debunked. As of now nothing to debunk.
Damn you got rocked Joe.
Delete"Duh, duh, duh... Fart, burp, duh?"
DeleteRead my posts down below and weep numpty
Schooled.
Derp derpy derp.
DeleteYou pwned yourself, imbecile.
Rocked. Smoked. You're welcome.
... Really? Scroll down...
DeleteAnd ask yourself who is smoked exactly...
Fooled ^
DeleteThe well documented archeological digs are hard to argue against. But like I said before coming from small, non ivy league schools at the time, not much credence was given to them. Mike says he know somethings about the Smithsonian cover up. Would like to hear about it.
ReplyDeleteChuck
He's already sent me a very exciting email... As soon as I'm done in work in gonna get in touch with him and post accordingly.
DeleteThere is without a doubt a cover up... All these remains HAVE to go through the State archeologist... That's unless someone has similar remains in the attic or somewhere to which I'm sure there would be repercussions should they declare such remains now having not done so in the first place. It's obvious and a dummy can see what's going on here.
Peace Chuck.
Joe. Double Smoked.
DeleteYaaaaaaaaaaawwwn.
Delete(Sigh)
Joe - WTF is WRONG WITH YOU? You have got to be the most ignorant stubborn idiot ever born. Give it a rest already no one wants to read your implausible dribble any more.
DeleteBut wait, it's really attention you need now isn't it. Okay, carry on and I hope you get more than enough (people like you never do though).
VROOOOOOMMMM VROOOOOOOOOMMMMM!!!!!!!
DeleteA silly man ^
DeleteHeinous Joe, You need to chill out, brah. Find a sistah she'll make you feel alright. I got some choice bud dat will make you forget about them big hairy fellas.
ReplyDeleteYou and me like brothers, Joe, cause we both bein' oppressed. You got that Queen Lizzy, she like de Queen of the Damned. She 153 years old brah, no one live dat long less they a vampire or a zombie. Rise up, Heinous Joe, stand up for your rights (brother Marley said that, Jah rest his soul). An don't get too close to that Queen Lizzy, she eat your face off.
That's pretty funny.
DeleteJah Rastafari
Got monkey joe
DeleteI haven't... Attenborough has some though.
DeletePeace.
You tube has plenty as well. i am sure in you search monkey in you tube you will have a monkey
DeleteAUSTRALIAN GIANTS
DeleteThere was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus"
by anthropologists. These people were of very large size--estimated between
7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read. These people were
found with mega tool artifacts, so their humaness is difficult to question.
Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of
"gigantopithecus blacki"--named after the discover. Based on the size of the
teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as
tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds.
PROOF OF AUSTRALIAN GIANTS:
In old river gravels near Bathurst, NSW, huge stone artifacts -- clubs,
pounders, adzes, chisels, knives and hand axes -- all of tremendous weight,
lie scattered over a wide area. These weigh anything from 8, 10, 15, to 21
and 25 pounds, implements which only men of tremendous proportions could
possibly have made and used. Estimates for the actual size of these men
range from 10 to 12 feet tall and over, weighing from 500 to 600 lbs.
A fossicker searching the Winburndale River north of Bathurst discovered a
large quartzitised fossil human molar tooth, far too big for any normal
modern man. A similar find was made near Dubbo, N.S.W.
Prospectors working in the Bathurst district in the 1930's frequently
reported coming across numerous large human footprints fossilised in shoals
of red jasper.
Even more impressive were fossil deposits found by naturalist Rex Gilroy
around Bathurst. He excavated from a depth of 6 feet (2 m) below the surface
a fossil lower back molar tooth measuring 67 mm. in length by 50mm. x 42 mm.
across the crown. If his measurements are correct, the owner would have been
at least 25 ft. tall, weighing well over 1,000 lbs!
At Gympie, Queensland, a farmer, Keith Walker, was ploughing his field when
he turned up the large fragment of the back portion of a jaw which still
possessed the hollow for a missing lower back molar tooth. This is now in
Rex GiIroy's possession. The owner of the tooth would have stood
at 10 feet tall.
In the Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains NSW, a Mr P. Holman found in
ironstone protruding from a creek bank the deeply impressed print of a large
human-like foot. The print was that of the instep, with all 5 toes clearly
shown. This footprint measures 7 inches across the toes. Had the footprint
been complete it would have been at least 2 feet (60 cm in length,
appropriate to a 12 foot human. However, the largest footprint found on the
Blue Mountains must have belonged to a man 20 feet tall!
A set of 3 huge footprints was discovered near Mulgoa, south of Penrith,
N.S.W. These prints, each measuring 2 ft long and 7 inches across the toes,
are 6 ft. apart, indicating the stride of the 12 ft. giant who left them.
These prints were preserved by volcanic lava and ash flows which "occurred
millions of years" before man is supposed to have appeared on the Australian
continent (if one is to believe the evolutionary theory):
Noel Reeves found monstrous footprints near Kempsey, N.S.W. in sandstone
beds on the Upper Macleay River. One print shows toe 4 inches (10cm) long
and the total toe-span is 10 inches (25cm) - suggesting that the owner of
the print may have been 17 feet tall.
It is certain the Aborigines were not the first to reach Australia.
Anthropologists maintain mainland Aborigines are in fact quite recent
arrivals that ate their precessors who were akin to the New Guinea natives.
Aborigine themselves admit in their ancient folklore that this land was
inhabited by several groups of men, as well as giants, before they settled
There is transcripts and artifacts from the aborigines stretching back as far as 25,000 years. As for the several groups of men. This consisted of. Maori, Papa New Guinea natives and pacific islanders. Recently European criminals.
DeleteOne of my favourite images is the 1790 Yowie woodcut... Fascinating.
DeletePeace.
Personalty there is to much resemblance to papa new guinea natives to be of a yeti to me. its well known aborigines feared them because they were eaten by them
DeleteWhat?!! Wow...
DeleteI dont know if the maori were there then but they were cannibalistic aswell
DeleteThe Mauri were, still are and always will be exceptionally tough people.
DeletePeace.
What you posted about 'meganthropus' is 100% bullshit lies. I didn't even continue to read after how blatantly false the first paragraph was.
DeleteDo you even attempt to understand the real science behind what you post or do you just copy paste it all in hopes someone else will school you on it?
Fucking pathetic.
What's the matter Crampz? Rattled?? That name was used by theorizing anthropologists, probably in the infancy of their research.
DeleteSchooled.
Carefull Dan or Joe is unleash a can of FE FI FO FUM all over you're ass.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteJoe, why did you throw in the gigantopithecus? They lived in China, are in the same family as orangutans, and have nothing to do with "giant, hairy humans"...In fact, as we all know, relic populations of the giganto's is an alternative explanation of the bigfoot phenomena...
DeleteIt was a theory that I considered before, but there simply isn't enough time for them to evolve into what people have reported for ten thousand years.
DeleteWhat are your thoughts?
Peace.
Fact is no one knows what order the gigantos were. Only a theory they were part orangutan. With only jaw and teeth too little to go on. Evidence does point to being massive.
DeleteChuck
Sorry for the late response, I had to get to work....Not sure what they would be if they exist..I lean toward something like giganto that evolved the human-like traits in parallel..You are right about the time problem, but I tend to side with the few experts who follow this stuff--Krantz and Meldrum...
DeleteAnyway... It's blatantly obvious I've been missed around here today whilst I've been at work, so here's a daily dose of truth that reading between the lines... You require so much;
ReplyDeleteTen skeletons "of both sexes and of gigantic size" were taken from a mound
at Warren, Minnesota, 1883. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 23, 1883)
A skeleton 7 feet 6 inches long was found in a massive stone structure that
was likened to a temple chamber within a mound in Kanawha County, West
Virginia, in 1884. (American Antiquarian, v6, 1884 133f. Cyrus Thomas,
Report on Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, 12th Annual Report,
Smithsonian Bureau of Ethnology, 1890-91).
A large mound near Gasterville, Pennsylvania, contained a vault in which was
found a skeleton measuring 7 feet 2 inches. Inscriptions were carved on the
vault. (American Antiquarian, v7, 1885, 52f).
In 1885, miners discovered the mummified remains of woman measuring 6 feet 8
inches tall holding an infant. The mummies were found in a cave behind a
wall of rock in the Yosemite Valley.
In Minnesota, 1888, were discovered remains of seven skeletons 7 to 8 feet
tall. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, June 29, 1888).
A mound near Toledo, Ohio, held 20 skeletons, seated and facing east with
jaws and teeth "twice as large as those of present day people," and besides
each was a large bowl with "curiously wrought hieroglyphic figures."
(Chicago Record, Oct. 24, 1895; cited by Ron G. Dobbins, NEARA Journal, v13,
fall 1978).
The skeleton of a huge man was uncovered at the Beckley farm, Lake Koronis,
Minnesota; while at Moose Island and Pine City, bones of other giants came
to light. (St. Paul Globe, Aug. 12, 1896).
In 1911, several red-haired mummies ranging from 6 and a half feet to 8 feet
tall were discovered in a cave in Lovelock, Nevada.
In February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the Humboldt
lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. The first of these two skeletons found
measured 8 1/2 feet tall and appeared to have been wrapped in a gum-covered
fabric similiar to the Egyptian manner. The second skeleton was almost 10
feet long. (Review - Miner, June 19, 1931).
A 7 foot 7 inch skeleton was reported to have been found on the Friedman
ranch, near Lovelock, Nevada, in 1939.(Review - Miner, Sept. 29, 1939)
In 1965, a skeleton measuring 8 feet 9 inches was found buried under a rock
ledge along the Holly Creek in east-central Kentucky.
Joe, what do you think of the Paluxy tracks?
DeleteI've just checked them out now and all I can say from initial reading is "wow!!"
DeleteWhat is your take on them?????
Peace.
Well of course main stream science has shunned them, but they were studied and still are. It sure is a fantastical thing to consider though, right? The truth that is hidden from us is indeed incredible.
DeleteBuddy... Hindu scholars maintain that there have been advanced civilisations come and go on this planet for many 100's of thousands of years. I know it's nuts. In the time that the Dinosaurs were supposedly on the planet, they could have evolved and left ten times over with no trace, especially when you take into account the possibilities of numerous pole shifts; there signs would be under the ocean and out of sight.
DeleteThose tracks are something else though Rush, thank you very much for that... I'll do some digging and we'll discuss when I'm up to scratch. Really enjoyed your posts lately bro.
Thanks.
Fucking hell joe is now jumping on the creationist bandwagon
Delete?????
DeleteWhere did I do that????
I would say to joe he should seek medical help but sadly for him I fear it is too late :(
ReplyDelete... And so the effects of the cover up proceed in the minds of the ignorant.
DeleteThis is why regimes don't even have to really make all that much of an effort to cover things like this up anymore, because it's down to numb skulls you haven't heard of such facts to call 'BS' on their behalf.
That's all I can say, is if this was part of my country's history, I'd be down the library most nights, not on the Playstation.
Peace.
You can type "peace" as many times as you want but that isnt gonna make bigfoot real.
DeleteYou have been smoked so many times its shameless for you to show your face here.
The absolute smackdown layed down by sykes has lead you on a path of government conspiracy cover ups. Its not healthy joe. I would suggest getting outside and experiencing the real world. Failing that watch Attenborough's "Life" series. It may just open your mind to what a beautiful amazing diverse world we live in without the need for a magic monkey man.
Myths are fun and all but at the end of the day they are fiction. The inability to separate fact from fiction is a dangerous road to go down.
Most "myths" have basis in fact.
DeleteYour JREF talking points are really old old old.
The "consolation prize" of we live in an amazing place without the "magic monkey man" is beaten and beyond tired.
You are boring.
You aren't saying anything new.
There was no Sykes "absolute smackdown," as the Zana Theory Number 2 attests, and which skeptics and skeptards are conveniently side-stepping in very damned comment they make.
We are very tired of you and your worn out magic monkey man talk.
Tired tired tired.
8:38...
DeleteIt is because of your Attenborough box set that you think that the world we live in has been accounted for. It's people like you who in fact should be concerned with the 'world outside'... Especially of your own back yard. It takes a particular type of person to do what you do and I can honestly say that it all my circles of friends, not a single one of them would prioritize their time in such a way, that's how I know you are just a very sad case.
The reason you hate the 'cover up theory' and attack me over it, is because you have nothing to counter it, and you know that all the signs are leading that route.
As long as you are here, I will be here and is you wanna talk about what 'healthy', if recommend you take your head out of your back side and channel your hate into something productive... Cause typing 'smoked' out as much as you like doesn't make facts and history go away.
Boooooooooommmmmmm!!!
Now run along... You have been schooled.
Well said Joe, well said.
DeleteWell said, he's probably just some jerk still clueless to the cover-up in this field but once he realizes that it's how it's done then he might change.
DeleteSyke's absolute smack down? Talk about absolutely delusional and childish conclusion.
DeleteJoe, your argument about "cover ups" is a classic logic fallacy. The burden of proof is first on the one who makes the claim. Since its nearly impossible to prove a "cover up" shifting the burden of proof to a critic as you've done is in effect asking him for a proof of impossibility. In the end, you've not proved anything at all.
DeleteAll of you, tell me where I'm wrong here.
Sykes proved by the DNA without a shadow of doubt Zana is Human, 100% human. If so, her story doesn't prove or support that unknown hominids exist. Correct? What am I missing here?
TO ALL THE CLOWNS THAT ARE CELEBRATING SYKES
ReplyDeleteUnusual features of Kwits skull -
*very wide eye sockets
*elevated brow ridge
*thats could suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins
Sykes' thought provoking alternative notion...
"Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"
W
H
A
T
D
O
T
H
E
T
A
R
D
S
T
H
I
N
K
O
F
T
H
A
T
?
SMOKED!!!!!!!!
"TO ALL THE GUYS CELEBRATING SYKES"
DeleteWeren't you one of the guys celebrating Sykes before the show aired and pwned you? Man this guy need so much medical attention.
VROOOOOOM VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
or as sykes said,its more likely that she was a slave.....the yeti results were very interesting in that a bear thought extinct is in fact still around.as for the usa bigfoot,as the programme said,the staunch belief of the footers is far more interesting than the fact that they dont actually exist......zana was a slave,nothing more nothing less,the yeti is a rare bear,and bigfoot im afraid just isnt there at all,that much is painfully obvious.
DeleteNo guys... He also said that it has to be at least one of those theories, the relic hominid theory being one of them!!!
DeleteSmoked,
Schooled,
Pwned,
Tick tock,
Sykes is coming,
Toasty smoked,
Obliterated,
Smoked,
SCHOOLED, SCHOOLED, SCHOOLED!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joe,you haven't took your meds today have you.
Delete"Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"
DeleteSmoked,
Schooled,
Pwned,
Tick tock,
Sykes is coming,
Toasty smoked,
Obliterated,
Smoked,
SCHOOLED, SCHOOLED, SCHOOLED!!!!!!!!!!!!
How did you come to the conclusion zana was a slave, nothing more nothing less? Certainly not from sykes.
DeleteRead the quote and weep!!!
DeleteBooooooommmmmmmm!!!
Sorry to ruin your day.
DNA = HUMAN
DeleteZana was captured in the present day country of Abkhazia, on the eastern shore of the Black Sea along the Caucasus Mountain range. Zana was described her as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws . Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately. She would climb trees to get fruit and nuts and could crack walnuts in her bare hands. Her appetite was tremendous, and she would eat any food the villagers offered her. She would pull down an entire wild grapevine from the tree to feast on the grapes. At, first Zana was fierce and belligerent and was kept in shackles and chains. Food was thrown to her from a distance. After a while she became calmer when approached, and then she was moved to an enclosure with a wattled fence, on one side of which was a building with an awning. Zana dug a shallow hole underneath the awning, where she slept. Her favored position for sleep and rest was to crouch on her knees and elbows with her hands clasped behind her head.
ReplyDeleteZana seemed to accept her life among the villagers. She showed an interest in taking part in human activities and Edgi taught her to grind flour from grain, to fetch firewood and water and carry sacks of flour to and from the water-powered mill in the village. (Zana could easily pick up a full sack of flour with one hand.)She would even pull Genaba's boots off at night. Zana preferred her own natural coat of hair to manmade clothing. Although given dresses to wear, they would soon become torn from her vigorous activities. Later on she would tolerate the wearing of a loincloth. Zana had a favorite activity; rapping stones together and splitting them. Zana preferred the colder weather and seemed to tolerate the winter chill with no discomfort. On warm summer days she enjoyed cooling off in the ponds with the domestic buffalo. Zana would swim in the Molkva river all year round, even in winter and in the raging spring floods. She spent most of her time outdoors but occasionally visited houses when invited indoors.
DeleteThe Detroit Lions need to find a Zana and sign her immediately.
DeleteChuck
DNA = Human unless you want to make the racist case she wasn't
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteJust sayin.....
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHey Joe, love the articles! Keep em comming!
ReplyDeleteHey Joe, did you ever find the "Unknown primate" outside of Ketchum? Cause I know where one is at. Sample was taking by the FBI and yield "unknown match" ha ha ha ha
ReplyDeleteThats right you TARDS, the FBI had something tested ------ no geenbank match, ha ha ha ha ha!
Bigfoot is real --------- he screamed at me!
The new recording Rev Jeff has ------- Big f'n Sasquatch.
Remember I told you about a sound you could feel and length of sound, ---- thts a FOOTY right there you here hollering! Ha ha h ah ah ah haha haah ahah a ha --- Stupid tards, thier real!!!!
Genebank, hear, sorry. God made me a poor spellar and a bad singer just to keep me humble. ha ha ha
ReplyDeleteHey "blog adminstrator" why don't you get rid of the idjits too? Don't pick on the racists only. Your site deserves better. hahahah
ReplyDeletePhil Poling and MK Davis did a breakdown of the Leaping Yeti while in the buff sharing a bucket of KFC.
ReplyDeleteUmmmmh...fingerlicking good!
CaCaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawww! Thank You for my time!