Tim Fasano Tells a Damn Good Bigfoot Campfire Story


Florida skunk ape hunter Tim Fasano has been spending a lot of time with the film crew that's filming his documentary. In this video, a crew member asked Fasano whether or not Bigfoot is an alien. Listen to Fasano's response:




Comments

  1. And the answer is a resounding yes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rhettman Mullis reports on FB:

      The show only purchased the rights to reveal 12 results. There are more than that still yet to reveal and the contributors have been notified by email, but they are not supposed to reveal their conclusions until the paper is published.

      More to come then in the paper, book, perhaps National Geographic special.

      The skeptards are having trouble counting. Sykes was to test over 30 samples; this was later revealed to be 50 or more; Channel Four bought rights to 12 samples; 50 - 12 leaves 38 samples remaining to discuss.

      The skeptards sure lose count easily. They are generally easily distracted. Let's make it clearer:

      12 samples (Channel Four) subtracted from 50 samples (total, though may be more) leaves you with 38 samples, the results of which have not been released.

      In other words, Sykes has more than three times the results still pending release, than what he did release through Channel Four.

      Let's help the skeptards again:

      12 x 3 = 36

      36 is almost 38

      Therefore Sykes has more than three times the results yet to release, than were already released.

      Skeptards please write these figures down so that you may refer to them in your many raving raging future comments, and try not to humiliate yourselves too severely again when it comes to these numbers.

      Delete
    2. Because I completely trust Rhettman Mullet to start with...

      But..bbut Sykes is only as good as his samples! Isn't that what you've been saying PJ?

      What makes you think any of these are better or will show bigfoot?

      Doesn't matter if he had 10 samples or 1,000. Figboot ain't real and YGNALI.

      Delete
    3. You're starting to get frantic now Crampz!! Ha ha ha ha!!!!

      Sykes will exactly... Be as good as his samples. I am not claiming what the long term samokes are gonna yield, but it is apparent that it concerns you greatly!

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!

      Delete
    4. Interesting...first you claim I want bigfoot to be real more than anyone and above you act as if it would be the end of my world.

      Stop switching sides like a politician.

      Delete
    5. You are not convincing anyone Crampz... We all know why you come here all day every day.

      Delete
    6. This is all some heavy shit

      WOW

      MMC

      Delete
    7. Nice use of....and a very appropriate use of my name sake towards PJ. It's honest, easy, and works every time.

      YGNALI

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Sensitive boy;

      Sykes...

      "Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"

      Unusual features of Kwits skull -

      *very wide eye sockets
      *elevated brow ridge
      *extra bone in neck
      *all these would suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins

      Zana's description...

      Zana was described her as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws . Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately.

      Suck on that sensitive boy...

      ; )

      Delete
    2. What part of zana was 100% modern human do you not understand?

      Is it the 100% part? That means fully human, not ancient hominid, not an offshoot from an earlier ancestor but identical to a modern human homo sapiens sapiens.

      Please stop making yourself look like an idiot.

      Delete
    3. Read up top and weep sucker...

      Schooled.

      Delete
    4. 100% modern homo sapien sapien is not a relict hominid, you poor poor bastard. Those features described are no more out of the ordinary in human development than any other anomalies.

      Look at khwit...looks like a 100% modern human.

      Delete
    5. Read bryan sykes dna results a weep sucker.

      100% modern human.

      Joe thinks he knows better than sykes... LOL

      Delete
    6. Sorry guys... I know it's difficult, I know it's not what you expected... I know it pisses on your parade... Don't blame me, blame the geneticist you've been screaming about for three weeks.

      ; )

      Delete
    7. Even grantz a bigfoot proponant said khwits skull is well within human proportions.

      Stop digging a hole joe and take your smoking like a man.

      Delete
    8. Unlucky guys... Unlucky... Blame Sykes, not me.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    9. Joe doesn't even know what he is arguing for anymore. He is now saying we should look at sykes results... THE 100% HUMAN RESULTS YOU MEAN?

      Delete
    10. Read it up top guys... I know it hurts. Look at the Kwit skull in comparison to that of any other skull and you can see the size, the eye sockets, the jaw... All very primitive looking. As long as Sykes says it could be from a relic population, then you are gonna have to cry about it; cause I'm certainly not gonna let you forget it.

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!

      You were all so pleased only a few days ago, you gotta love it!!!!!

      Delete
    11. I have an extra bone in my ankle and 100% modern human DNA...

      Does this mean I'm Sasquatch? Or must one be of dark skin to be accepted into the Squatch club??

      Delete
    12. Sorry guys... I know it's difficult, but you had it coming really; celebrating and all, you should have listened to your own taunting of other people running their mouths.

      Classic.

      Delete
    13. My friends little brother has Down's syndrome, his skull proportions and features are much more relict in comparison to real people, is he a Sasquatch?

      What about Andre the Giant? High sloping forehead, prominent brow ridge, oddly shaped cranium, odd proportions...broken French dialect...is he a Squatch too??

      Delete
    14. ... And all of a sudden... We have physical evidence that coincides with documented studies that have uncovered huge skeletons around the same time Zana lived?

      Classic...

      Delete
    15. Little Jimmy Dickens...small in stature, compliant gate, long arms, round cranium...could he be an orang Pendek? Perhaps homo floriensis??!

      Delete
    16. Sorry Crampz... Blame Sykes, don't shoot the messenger.

      Im truly sorry.... "WhooooooOOOOOOOO!!!!"

      (My nose got much longer and made that sound)

      Delete
    17. Sorry Joe... I know it's difficult, I know it's not what you expected... I know it pisses on your parade... Don't blame me, blame the geneticist you've been screaming about for three months.

      100% HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN.

      How's that foot taste Joe?

      Delete
    18. Read up top guys... You all wouldn't be so upset if the truth didn't hurt!!!

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!

      Classic!!!!!

      Delete
    19. Sorry Danny, but I'll stick with the experts than can obviously tell the difference between a skull belonging to someone with giant ism or downs syndrome over a skull that has ancient hominid possibilities.

      Delete
    20. Taterjoe deep in denial
      Defense mechanisms in full spin
      How can I cover this up, mind runs wild
      I know, I'll act all crazy and blame it on the Djinn

      Delete
    21. People with DS have a resemblance to some primates. I'm not trying to be offensive but just describing my own opinion. It is a difference in the number of chromosomes. Weird some primates have a different number of chromosomes? Weird??!?!

      Delete
    22. The Usual Skeptard Nonsense AboveThursday, November 7, 2013 at 10:03:00 AM PST

      Skyes theorizes that Zana may be an archaic African homo sapiens. 7 feet tall covered in reddish hair with great strength? Who cares 9:46 et al about your parrotting homo sapien sapien over and over? If she were standing in front of you and tallying with this description, you would be crying out No way! to modern human DNA. Your eyes and the DNA results would disagree.

      It is what it is. If she carried that DNA, she was also apparently according to Sykes' second theory, an archaic African.

      Archaic is an antonym of modern.

      There is more to learn about DNA apparently. 9:46 and Co. think scientists have complete knowledge in 2013 about DNA, they know it all, that's it, it's all sewn up, The End.

      Obviously they don't. If Zana was archaic, 7 feet and hair covered, a true wildwoman, from a tribe of similarly sized/looking/behaving archaics who lived in the mountains without fire, and they all tested as having modern human DNA, then cheerio baby, scientists don't know all there is to know about DNA. There is a mystery.

      Delete
    23. Bigfoot is human. The penny will drop in you people one day.

      Peace.

      Delete
    24. There is nothin but speculation and wild old white man stories where they never saw black people about Zana.

      The only conclusive facts to be shown from Khwits mTDNA is that Zana was 100% modern homo sapien sapien.

      We have no pictures, no skeleton, nothing to say the locals didn't just find an old slave or slave child that possibly was ferral and most likely had developmental issues and was probably mentally retarded.

      This was a freak show for the locals. Wild black woman that they'd get hammered and then hammer themselves like dirty old white pigs.

      Look at what Africans did with tht chimp a few years back in the brothel. Shaved it and went to pound town as a novelty. The chimp was the most frequented whore at the brothel.

      Bottom line is despite anomalies within human range, the DNA still read 100% modern homo sapien sapien. Not 98%, not some other archaic branch of homo, 100% modern human people.

      Doesn't help she probably had a dozen people rape her the night khwit was conceived.

      Delete
    25. Unlucky Crampz!!! You've been served.

      Bigfoot is human and it has ruined your day.

      Also... You have spun a version of the story as an explanation. Doesn't wash when you have those skull proportions.

      Use your imagination for a second and think to yourself; "what must have Zana's skull proportions have looked like?"

      Answer - like the 100 eye witness account provided up top??

      Schooled. Bigfoot are humans.

      Delete
    26. I deal with facts, not stories and unfounded claims. I don't believe a word said to me unless I am shown the physical proof of said event. Doesn't matter if the eye witness is my own mother, you, dick hole from down the road, Johnny cumlately, mike brookreson, POTUS, the Dhali Llama, your grandmother, or Vladimir Putin.

      Zana was revealed as 100% modern homo sapien sapien. Her features although intriguing are still well within the normal human morphology, not out of this world can't be human crap like you believe.

      Khwit's picture shows a damn human, now if his momma was a figbitch as you claim, wouldn't he be a lot more...ummm bigfoot looking than modern human seeing as he's child of one?

      Not to mention the population it would take to keep a clean genetic tree going in remote areas. Either they'd interbreed themselves out of existence or be forced into extinction.

      There's a bazillion holes and flaws in every single one of your theories, PJ, but you're so batshit locked on that you plug your ears to the rest of the world and go la la la la la la.

      Delete
    27. No... There's a bazillion Hudini-esque escapes that you have come to be an expert in...

      "don't believe a word said to me unless I am shown the physical proof of said event."

      Well let's see how you explain away the features of Kwit's skull in line with a watered down version of Zana's description.

      Zana was human... Bigfoot is human... Sykes upsets you.

      Peace.

      Delete
    28. Hudini took what people thought were impossible feats and showed them it was possible. He knew the ins and outs, he knew where he could take shortcuts and where he couldn't.

      I was down the road you were on years ago, then I grew up and started looking at everything without that little twinkle of bf in my eye.

      I have seen it all and read it all, I see the world through devious eyes because that's how you have to see it. To catch a thief, you must first think like a thief...many people can't actually do that but I can.

      You have holes and flaws in every single claim and theory you propose, whether you wish to acknowledge that or not.

      Fact being is all of these traits from BF still don't mesh if BF is human like you spout above. If she would be human, she would be human like us...not 8 feet, bioluminescent, no neck, super strong, blah blah blah.

      Zana and khwit were 100% modern humans despite whatever slight abnormalities there was. Khwit's picture clearly shows a human.

      You hate me more than you want BF to be real. Stop letting your emotions overrule what little cognitive deduction skills you may possess.

      Delete
    29. You say you deal in facts dan, then make up a ridiculous unsubstantiated story about feral retarded children, where is your proof of this? You just spout whatever nonsense supports your theory.

      Delete
    30. danny has been feeling up his friend's brother's skull? What a weird dude.

      Delete
    31. Flaws and holes translate to 'claims that have counter claims'... you read so little of other people's comments that you choose to ignore this and this is why I came up with the STEP 4 syndrome; just for people like you that choose to soak in the ignorance of narcissistic debating.

      The traits do fit if it's a wild human... If you knew as much about this subject that you claim to, then you would have thought of that before dribbling on to the keyboard... Which, leads me to assume that you haven't read all you claim to have read because you are from the bitter dated group that didn't get their bipedal gorilla.

      It was at that moment when the penny dropped and you realised how foolish you were to believe in a bipedal, herbivorous animal that wasn't there, that you chise to make up for it and take it out on the field of enthusiasts still left with patience.

      Unfortunately for you, the field evolved with your bitterness still with so much to express. How can anyone take your opinion seriously when only a few years ago you were spouting the same stuff you are now attacking?

      Kwit's picture shows a watered down human Bigfoot and does not show the proportions because he is not photographed next to anyone else, and his mother probably looked very human as Bigfoot do.

      I don't hate you Crampz... But denial is a bitch and as much as you attack and scratch and kick and bite, you still frequent a blog where 'Bigfoot doesn't exist'? Yeah, right... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!

      Delete
    32. This blog is suppose to be about fasano folks. I think he is a different species too. Fat genus homo . There ya go

      Delete
    33. It's easy to tell a good story when all you do is bullshit

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. Actually it's pretty easy to see Joe riles you guys up like a pack of animals. It's hilarious to watch. You all look like weaklings every time you attack him and you do it all the time.

      Delete
    2. It is hilarious, I'll give you that. The rest of your reasoning is rather poor.

      Delete
    3. Sensitive Joe is the one who gets riled up. It's not funny. It's sad.

      Delete
    4. Nope, it's not poor reasoning at all, but keep trying to justify your behavior. You guys are pathetic. You come onto a forum about something you don't believe and spend shit loads of time perusing one poster because he pisses you off that much. That says it all. Hilarious.

      Delete
    5. Joe doesn't get riled up at all that's pure fantasy which isn't a surprise. He owns you guys and you know it. You try so fucking hard but he's steadfast, very diplomatic overall and keeps a level head. The rest of you look like weaklings. Hilarious.

      Delete
    6. Sometimes you just have to take a picture of your nut sack and post a link to prove you're a boy.Isn't that right Danny Boy.

      Delete
    7. We come to a BLOG, called bigfoot evidence that doesn't actually post any evidence because there is a sore lack of it in the entire field. This BLOG posts more non-bf related material than actual BF material.

      We laugh at the severe delusions and fantasies that run wild in footery, it's like a trashy reality show. All the back stabbing, bickering, hoaxes and cons, cliques is nearly too much to resist.

      Hell, this place provides more sheer entertainment than MTV has provided people in the last 20 years.

      Delete
    8. Ah gottcha, so you admit you're fucking pathetic, eh Dan? Seriously read what you just wrote. That's utterly sad.

      Delete
    9. You can call me whatever you wish, doesn't make up for the sheer lack of bigfoot that's been around since the dawn of man, all across the country...peekin' from behind trees, eating out of city dumpsters, enjoying a nice PBJ sammich from a dog bowl behind Doc Johnson's house.

      Delete
    10. Dan Campbell wants Bigfoot to be real more than anyone... Why else would he spend all day, every day here?!

      He's as big a Footer than anyone.

      Delete
    11. I will call you what you are Dan. I don't need to summarize my points again. Read em and weep.

      Delete
    12. Act like I spend all day here. I post between 2-3 hour span early in the morning and occasionally before I fall asleep.

      Bitch please.

      As of yet, no one has thrown science in my face and said "you're wrong about bigfoot and here's a scientifically backed reason why!"

      It just hasn't happened. Meanwhile, PJ is still in Wales...never to leave.

      Delete
    13. The fact that you're here practically every day trolling off and on throughout the day says it all. And you admit this. What a pathetic individual.

      Delete
    14. Crampz you might as well just come clean that you want Bigfoot to be real more than anyone...

      Scientifically backed Sykes suggests Zana may have been relic; scientifically acknowledge that.

      Peace.

      Delete
    15. I'm amazed at number of times Joe schools Daniel and yet he coming back for more with his you've got no evidence comment,if Daniel was a detective he make inspector Clouseau look clever xx

      Delete
    16. ^^^ DAN CAMPZ you are always here , go see a shrink, your sick ! worry about yourself,, not others.

      Delete
    17. I think the cops should check for missing persons in his area .. D campbell is that SICK !

      Delete
    18. Hey Dan, Is your girlfriend walking around kinda funny lately? Me and my Bro pulled a train on her the other night. She loved it. Let's just say, she can now open an Ice cream shop, but will only be able to serve Vanilla!

      Delete
  4. The key to the question may be with the Annunaki.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it possible? Yes it is.

      Delete
    2. You may be right Anon 9 06. I believe the Annunaki and the Nephilim were the same, the creators. Annunaki being Sumerian and Nephilim being Hebrew meaning those who came from above. Let Us make man in our image. I studied all this back in the early to mid 90s having read all of Sitchin's books to that date and he makes a great case.

      Chuck

      Delete
    3. Just checked JOE. Mike sent it to me. I will compose a message and how to view video probably tonight so you can view it in the morning. I think it is neat, most would not. It ain't nothin like what is happening with Mike from what he sent me. WOW. Got work to do. Check email in AM.

      Chuck Peace

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joe sykes results were they or were they not that zana was 100% modern human? Just answer that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon did Sykes not offer an alternative;

      "Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"

      ... Did he not say that? Answer me that...

      Delete
    2. Answer the fucking question.

      Delete
    3. I've always acknowledged those were the results, what you simply do not do is acknowledge what Sykes offers as an alternative explanation...

      Did he, or did he not say that quote up top???

      Delete
    4. Maybe she was an ancient freakin alien.

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  8. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

    Honkey dropped the NiggaBomb!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. what an asshole! why am i laughing?

      Delete
    2. ^ Because you have no empathy! ! a common characteristic, of serial axe murderers,,

      Delete
    3. ^ DONT FORGET , RACIST &, SEX PERVERTS,,,

      Delete
  9. Replies
    1. Ok...tattle tail...I'm leaving....

      got to admit it's a lil' bit funny tho'

      Delete
    2. Joe there is no rule against you moderating you're self. Stop whining and just don't post anything for a month.

      Delete
  10. "They" account for 15% of the population but 45% of the prison population. The rest are in the NFL or NBA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

      PWNED ROYAL!

      TRUTHFULLY PWNED the black man!

      Delete
    2. What's this? Danny is ignorant?

      Delete
    3. D.C. is THE racist !! or a clever attempt by the blog administers.. for point counter point !

      Delete
  11. Joe let me ask you this:

    When comparing caucasoid and negroid features to those reported of Sasquatch, which race is more represented on say a graph depicting parallel or shared physical traits proportional to that races' overall population?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a mix of ape looking, Caucasian looking, Native American looking, East Asian looking... There are too many types of Sasquatch features to list here now, but what is very apparent is that they are bigger, with prominent brow ridges, bigger jaws and bigger eyes... Not all of them with bigger eyes, but most.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. "it could be from a relic population " joe fitz could be right the results r not final yet u have to wait and see! What's the big deal? Joe seems to be more on top of this stuff then most! Canada guy ttl

      Delete
    3. Let's see how this unfolds TTL... You make me smile bro!

      Delete
    4. HOWDY-BOY!

      Delete
  12. BullShit Joe, you are a denialist. Look at any illustration of a fucking bigfoot and tell me they don't look more like the Negroid race.

    Take of your white hate glasses, and take a good look at Patty. Which race of humans are the most athletic and physically gifted kinesthetically?

    Native Americans are one of the most hairless races of humans. You have argued and been a vocal supporter of Sykes African early migration hypothesis.

    The modern day Negroid is the closest genetically to Sasquatch, and it will be proven one day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you need to read my comment properly and don't be so angry. You are not reading between the lines of what in implying. If Bigfoot are human then there could be mutiple races, which is what the eye witness reports suggest.

      I don't stereotype and if Sykes says Bigfoot originated out of Africa, that would be amazing because we have pyramids in every continent where Wild men reside (except Australia).

      Oh... And check out some Harvey Pratt drawings of eye witness accounts; I think you'll find plenty of Native looking Squatch that have beards.

      Chill and don't jump the gun.

      Delete
  13. Fatsano is nothing but a fat hoaxer who is in business with the owner of this site, Shawn "moneywhore" evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. (clive squashy)

    Tim Fasano Rolls a Damn Good Big Dubie at Campfire Story

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. whats dubie and why would you role it too a story. a story is words in the ir. it would be hard to pin them down ,id have thought
      could it be you meant cabman 'can role a big doobie when telling a story'.

      there u go ,it's not hard. let me the first to introduce the English language to you guys

      Delete
  16. My God ,inter dimensional beings, portals, nephilum, people ran from the devil". Its all very exciting but shows these people are actualy mentaly ill.
    when science proves time and agan there aren't 2thousands of ape oeople in national parks and yards in North America" ,now these tools want us to belive there is an alien portal between part of North America only[since its the centre of the world and aliens would have no desire to use the African food source,check out Europe etc...] as that's where all the fat people and fast food is, its Hollywood baby!


    you pricks have officially left the reservation

    I can put up with hoaxes, in people droll witless comments, blobsquatches etc,..but I draw the line at demoni/alien ape creatures going through a stargate

    face the facts,i realise they aren't palatable to you, sykes[amongst many before him] has proven smeja/phonix project' etc...are liars and idiots howling at the moon in an attemot to make money of of a myth.

    crazy americans. if I were uid be concernec=d about your countries horrific mass killing foreign policy and forget about ape people and get real.

    your country is a world laughing stock, you re regarded as fat gormless loudmouth s by thentire world[ bleeve me its true]. so this type of thing is called escapism in the face of evidence. you are walking stereotypes

    yes I know eat crow,fuck off blah blah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you are a little sad that Sykes wee-we'd on your parade, those sensationalist comparisons and scenario's are not the theories of anyone here and you don't have to 'put up' with anything... You can simply go away.

      Schooled silly man.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking: Derek Randles Releases Most Amazing Thermal Footage of Bigfoot Ever