This Man Claims The M.I.B. Stole His Bigfoot -- Again
After months of collecting money from people who wanted to believe he had an actual Bigfoot body, Dyer, an infamous hoaxer from 2008, is forced to tell the truth. In 2008 Dyer claimed his Bigfoot was confiscated by the Men-In-Black. Five years later, he makes the same claim. Another five years from now, he'll probably do it again.
After last night's annoucment, Frank Cali, Dyer's former right-hand man, said it the best: "He admitted to Tom yesterday it was all a HOAX....H O A X. I told you he was going to say the MIB's game and took it. What a BSer... Everyone got money back who filed a claim as far as I was told. If I had not come forward he would have taken the money and run. I hurt him in his wallet. That's what is most important to Dyer."
 |
| What's next up on Dyer's list of things to do |
Two words!!
ReplyDeleteNature ******* Journal!!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteD.
DeleteVote D.
Wishing for an easy life ^
DeleteYawn
DeleteJoe, are you the engine or the caboose on the Melba train?
DeleteWhy who could possibly have seen that coming?At least he still has Musky,Lindsay and FB/FB
DeleteThis guy should be locked up, or better yet, get a bullet between his piggy eyes.
ReplyDeleteHow is this man still standing?
ReplyDeleteeasy,, anon2:13 sent him all his $,, now hes BROKE,, & BUTTHURT,,
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteBecause footers are gullible retards waiting to throw money at anyone whom they believe will give them affirmation over bigfoot. Nothing squatchers love more than other people telling them they definently saw a Squatch.
DeleteWhat's the matter Crampz? Still miffed at your ass-handing by Eva and your archaic human fears becoming more apparent??
DeleteYou got nailed yesterday Danny boy, in one of the best fashions possible. I'm surprised you turned up for more today.
Ha ha!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteNope Crampz, ha ha ha!!
DeleteYou have a theory of archaic humans that was offered in light of inspection of Zwit's skull to which now... Is being accepted as a real genetic explanation by one of the biggest journals in the workd... That is significant, it fits my theories and that doesn't lessen with funny Jesus comparisons that are totally and utterly not possible at all.
Think? No, I know ball jokes hurt you... You wouldn't react the way you do the them and you wouldn't suggest they don't hurt you in light of having nothing else as a come back with. Eva schooled you hence the offensive names.
The only gross missconception here is someone thinking that they were on anyone's chin, when in fact, they were merely posted on a blog for all to see and never forget. All else is in the mind of one who thinks his opinions count in the face of archaic human theories taking gradually accepted by science's elite.
; )
In case you haven't noticed, motherfucker, I always swear and use profanity. It's not like I have to get riled up to be vulgar, it's instilled.
DeleteSecond, you think bigfoot (patty) is 100% modern human.
Umm LOL hahaha
Don't you dare say it's not possible our lord and savior to show himself to me during my morning shit. HOW DO YOU KNOW PJ?!?!
WTF does Khwit's normal human skull have to do with what Nature said about some 50,000 year old hominid?
Still no living hominids, still no bigfoot, Zana been dead for 150 years, her son was normal, her descendants are normal.
You have exactly what you had at the start - stories and opinions.
"In case you haven't noticed, m**********, I always swear and use profanity. It's not like I have to get riled up to be vulgar, it's instilled."
Delete... And keep it up Crampz, you'll be writing your second suck up letter at this rate!
"Second, you think bigfoot (patty) is 100% modern human."
... I don't know what Patty is until we can sit down and swob her family members, but at this rate if she has the same description as Zana, yes; why can't she be modern archaic human? Laughably, you only have to look at Zana's description, the physical evidence in Kwit and the DNA results to acknowledge that.
"Don't you dare say it's not possible our lord and savior to show himself to me during my morning shit. HOW DO YOU KNOW PJ?!?!"
(Sigh)
"WTF does Khwit's normal human skull have to do with what Nature said about some 50,000 year old hominid?"
(Sigh, here we go again... )
Kwit's skull is not 'normal' -
*very wide eye sockets
*elevated brow ridge
*bigger teeth
*bigger jaw bone
*bigger all round
*extra bone in neck
... Because Kwit is physical evidence of Zana's Bigfoot proportions, to which yielded modern human DNA, to which yielded an alternative theory to explain those proportions in the shape of 'archaic modern human', to which in turn you said was BS, to which now Nature Journal have confirmed that archaic humans were the case.
I have always said Bigfoot is human.
"Still no living hominids, still no bigfoot, Zana been dead for 150 years, her son was normal, her descendants are normal."
... You have an account of a Bigfoot a 100 years ago that can be backed up with physical evidence and has a direct blood line living today. You have anthropological studies documenting giant bones from the same time as Zana lived. You have another Bigfoot documented in film footage 46 years ago... That is backed up further with the development of an entire research field that has prints, language more footage.
"You have exactly what you had at the start - stories and opinions."
... For this; I'll refer you again to Rule number 2 of Militant Tardism...
"If you can't debunk any sources of evidence, merely deny it is there and repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Yawn..."
Textbook Crampz.
How do you type posts like that without cringing yourself inside-out?
DeleteHow do you write posts like that without rethinking your priorities in life?
DeleteYawn
DeleteThe fact that more than one homo existed at the same time 50,000 years ago and got it on PROVES without a doubt bigfoot is real!
DeleteHow you sit there and blatantly post racist trash is beyond me. I don't believe half of the stories concerning Zana. What I do believe is that after finding out the DNA results is that without a doubt Zana was 100% modern human.
DeleteYou refuse to accept that Khwit's skull really isn't as abnormal as you like to claim. He's a normal human being hence 100% modern human DNA.
Is Nikolai Valuev a bigfoot? Serious question faggot.... Is he a bigfoot? 100% modern human with an abnormal size and skull shape. Widely spaced eyes, elevated brow ridge, extra fap dangles, blah.
Yet you have the guille to stand in front of my lord and savior and preach to me about the existence of bigfoot? Go away, shithead. Lucky you welched on the bet indeed.
Maybe if you cry again, just like when Sykes yeti results came back, then it will help it to become real.
46 years, 3 lifetimes and not a viable piece of proof of one single North American sasqutch.
HA HA HA HA HA!!
DeleteStating that Zana's descriptions were mere racism is in fact a slap in the face for such a cause and I don't appreciate you using that to gain a moral high ground (you of all people) to ignite guilt as opposed to actually challenging the theories I have posed... Regardless of how little left you have to go by. It is also indicative of your true morals when you latch on to such a claim of morality and then use homosexual profanities in the same sentence. You're not fooling anyone Crampz.
Kwit's skull is not 'normal' -
*very wide eye sockets
*elevated brow ridge
*bigger teeth
*bigger jaw bone
*bigger all round
*extra bone in neck
... That description is fact Campz and I repeat; is not normal. The DNA is human because Bigfoot are archaic humans.
I tell you what! Why don't you ask Nikolai Valuev for a swob to find out eh?! That would be priceless, Crampz asking Valuev for a swob in the crotch, he'd be too tall for Crampz to reach his mouth, HA HA HA HA!!
There is only one person who is lucky that bet didn't persist, and you are forgetting out of all of that just who was the one person that had to come from behind his anonymity, reeled in like a turd on a hook, HA HA HA!! And I got you classic time!!
The Yeti results... Laughably, do not debunk the region as Big as the Himalayas, with the long history of the Yeti, with JUST two bear samples. It also begs the question that if there is a bear up there that only locals have seen for hundreds of years; then what else is?
Oh and Crampz... One last thing;
Got monkey suit?
You poor useless twat.
DeleteI can't believe you believe Dan Campbell is my real name.
Hahaha.
Bigfoot isn't real. Zana was 100% modern homo sapien sapien from the Ottoman Empire, her sons were all quite normal.
No nocturnal vision like you claim, no extra bone in the neck, all normal disparities in the human range.
If you actually had evidence you wouldn't even need to be having this conversation because you have proof...but you don't and you take racist stories as fact of bigfoot.
Say it then, PJ...
PJ was a black woman in a land of white people who fed her alcohol and raped her.
HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
DeleteDaniel, Daniel, Daniel... You and me both know that is INDEED your real name, so don't try that because it makes you look even more desperate than your threads suggest.
As for the rest of your comment, it's all mere dribble that you have posted about ten times already in this thread, that I have also put in it's place quite sufficiently, and quite frankly... I'm bored of you now.
Using racism claims in the face of physical evidence for Zana is pretty desperate and shows how far you have stooped.
I'll refer you again to Rule number 2 of Militant Tardism...
"If you can't debunk any sources of evidence, merely deny it is there and repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Yawn..."
Textbook Daniel Campbell (his real name and I can prove it).
; ).
Easy Joe...
DeleteNo telling what parts of his privates he'll post next.
It's way too early to be seeing this man's pee pee.
MMG
God Damnit, Dan go away you're fucking annoying
DeleteHaha you keep believing that PJ.
DeleteHow is this man still standing?
ReplyDeleteBecause toilets are just not large enough to handle the load.
DeleteCredit where credit is due at least he admits he is hoaxing. All of the high ups in footery hoax but will never admit it. There is no bigfoot. That's just a given at this point.
ReplyDeleteYou haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about do you?
DeleteJust shut yer yapper, PJ, no one wants to read your shitty opinions on bigfoot right now.
DeleteRule number 1 of Militant Tradism...
Delete"If you can't prove any of your claims, just say all Footery is a hoax... It deflects from becoming a true reflection of the theory group."
Textbook.
Rule number 2 of Militant Tardism...
Delete"If you can't debunk any sources of evidence, merely deny it is there and repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Yawn..."
Textbook Crampz.
Don't even talk about proof you piece of dogshit.
DeleteYou believe in your crazy head you have undeniable proof of bigfoot...yet here we fucking are, rabbling over your complete lack of proof again.
It's getting old, PJ, so when are you going to show skeptics...uh actual proof.
When are you going to have answers to your shitty questions and not just spout off nonsense then run away saying 'I don't know'
When will it be, PJ?
Rule number 3 of Militant Tardism...
Delete"Make sure you express hate on social blogs; it hides insecurities of not having any control over the world around you."
Textbook.
Ha ha ha ha!!
DeleteI think you'll find, I can't answer questions not even the best evolutionary biologists and geneticists in the world can't answer.
Ha ha ha! It's nice to see you so pissed today. Thought you were so clever last couple of days in your attempt to lessen my little victory over you, but in all your comments that 'I have been wrong, I'm always wrong', you forget that so far I've always managed to come back at you with a bucket of crap to throw down the basement stairs at you.
Zana legend - physical evidence Kwit - archaic human theory - archaic human theory now baked up.
Pissed?
Rule number 4 of Militant Tardism...
Delete"If you are stuck with nothing else to do (this you'll find often), just hurl names and offensive language, this makes you look tough, but only to those that don't realise you're a skinny runt on your moma's desktop"
Textbook.
Dude you are a full retard.
DeleteI can't even laugh at you anymore, it feels bad.
The world is abuzz about bigfoot not being proven once again by Dr. Bryan Sykes...
More reasons why, tonight at 11 with PJ taterjoe.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteSeems like that Danny boy pokes the brown eye and likes it.
DeleteYea,he loves the mud helmet.Makes him feel like a queen.
DeleteTaking the train to POUND TOWN!ALL ABOARD!!!!!
Delete^ Joe
DeleteWrong dildo breath
DeleteYawn
DeleteJoe is a textbook example of delusion. He is ALWAYS right even though the rest of the world is too stupid to see that.
DeleteSchooled ^
Delete^Smoked
DeleteKing of Reality
Oh dear... Not by you, not by your hero Crampz... Not by any of your sort.
DeleteThey are a bit cantankerous today
DeleteJoe getting smoked today damn...
ReplyDeleteSmokes Joes pipe^
DeleteI just went and double checked the 5 biggest bigfoot sites and it checks out,
ReplyDeleteNot a single one talking about Bryan Sykes or even his 'alternate theory'.
Not one talkin about Zana nor Khwit.
A bunch of 100% modern humans along the search though.
How DARE you.
DeleteZana would have looked like patty who would also have 100% human dna.
Dr Bryan Sykes after considering the differences in Kwit's proportions -
Delete"Maybe she (Zana) isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"
Nature Journal -
"All humans whose ancestry originates outside of Africa owe about 2% of their genome to Neanderthals; and certain populations living in Oceania, such as Papua New Guineans and Australian Aboriginals, got about 4% of their DNA from interbreeding between their ancestors and Denisovans, who are named after the cave in Siberia’s Altai Mountains where they were discovered. The cave contains remains deposited there between 30,000 and 50,000 years ago.
Those conclusions however were based on low-quality genome sequences, riddled with errors and full of gaps, David Reich, an evolutionary geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts said at the meeting. His team, in collaboration with Svante Pääbo at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, have now produced much more complete versions of the Denisovan and Neanderthal genomes — matching the quality of contemporary human genomes. The high-quality Denisovan genome data and new Neanderthal genome both come from bones recovered from Denisova Cave.
The new Denisovan genome indicates that this enigmatic population got around: Reich said at the meeting that they interbred with Neanderthals and with the ancestors of human populations that now live in China and other parts of East Asia, in addition to Oceanic populations, as his team previously reported. Most surprisingly, Reich said, the new genomes indicate that Denisovans interbred with another extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia more than 30,000 years ago, which is neither human nor Neanderthal.
The meeting was abuzz with conjecture about the identity of this potentially new population of humans. “We don’t have the faintest idea,” says Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the London Natural History Museum, who was not involved in the work. He speculates that the population could be related to Homo heidelbergensis, a species that left Africa around half a million years ago and later gave rise to Neanderthals in Europe. “Perhaps it lived on in Asia as well,” Stringer says."
Thanks for posting this Joe, saved me the time from looking it up. Every time academia thinks they are getting a handle on the ancients, something like this comes along.
DeleteAnother extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia over 30,000 years ago.
Any thoughts on what this means Joe or if Tzieth is around he is far more schooled on this matter than me.
Chuck
I would love to hear Tzieth's viewpoint on this, it is one I very much look out for. Let's hope he's about today.
DeletePeace Chuck, hope all is well with you my friend.
Oh and here's the link...
Deletehttp://www.nature.com/news/mystery-humans-spiced-up-ancients-rampant-sex-lives-1.14196
Peace.
Arise Lazarus Taxa. Show yourself. Interesting stuff Joe. I remember 3 bloggers going Down this Very Roac on this subject some three weeks ago. One specific blogger, can't remember his name was quite prepared to accept ancient migrations. Like the late Tupac Shakur and his old friends at Digital Underground, the species clearly , "gets around". :)
DeleteJoe, I can't find the word "Bigfoot" or "Sasquatch" or "Yeti" or "Almasti" in the article. Neither taterhole to be honest.
DeleteI am truly sorry for anyone who gave money to the asshole captioned above. People who've had experiences want validation so badly and acceptance that they'll often go to great measures to seek it. What Plato encourages us to do when we appreciate art or drama, to willingly suspend our disbelief, is often done in the application of real life claims when folks want badly to have a challenging experience validated. So they in turn will willingly look to anyone for such relief including: false prophets and fools to validate their challenging experience. It takes a special kind of dullard and sociopath to use this weakened state for financial gain. And old fashioned ass whipping is too good for three types. Though I would personally administer one free of charge and will do so should anyone revisit a Home Depot in this city with me having knowledge aforethought. Morgan Matthews. You were deliberately assaulted and battered in the State of Texas. They take that shit very seriously down here in Bexar County. Should you ever wish to prosecute the asshole that did it. It appears he's made statements against his own interest on multiple occasions. I can only offer you a very comfortable place to stay when you testify. VTY. M
Delete6:21...
DeleteThat would be because those names have been given to this species in the last few hundred couple of hundred years.
(Duh?)
What name would you give them Joe, if vested with such power?
DeleteHmmmmmm, excellent question my dear friend!!
DeleteAboriginal peoples of North America??? Something like this...
You????
I would give them a name worthy of their intelligence and perspective accumulated through all these years of survival. A name that either they or their forbears chose as......their own.
DeleteHave a great day Joe Fitzgerald. That in my humble estimation is a good name to bear indeed.
DeleteActually, you are completely right! That would be something quite special to ascertain and would be what is most important.
DeleteMuch respect Mike... Speak to you later my friend.
I would call them "magic people living in dreams"
DeleteHa,no neck ,uni brow lump heads,but not to their faces
DeleteYGNALI
ReplyDeleteYGSANLI
DeleteYGNALI
DeleteYGSANLI
DeleteYGNALI
DeleteYGSANLI
Deletelooks like Joe is saying the same thing about nothing... as always
DeleteRussian leaping yeti
ReplyDeleteSykes is coming
Derp derp derp
-joe fitz
Sharon Shill, how are you?
DeleteHave you sold any of your I Doubt It angry-eyes mugs lately?
Made any cash on bigfoot lately?
^Um, who you talking to, bro?
DeleteDon't even think of messing with the hotness that is Sharon H.
Anyone got a copy of Bangkok Working Girls 1 or 2?
ReplyDeleteI did.It sucked.Literally.
DeleteI much prefer Back Door Hookers. And vodka.
DeleteWHAAT, ABOUT , NAGASAKI NOOKIE!!,& HONGKONG HARLOT !!,,and last but not least SUKI YAKI SUCK OFF ???!!!!
DeleteI know,I know, BANNED!! ^
DeleteAnd as always the bigfooters will want to believe this guy. Stupid....
ReplyDeleteI would like to put you quite right... There are only a very small select few of Bigfoot enthusiasts that support this guy. Most of his exposure has come from within the field.
DeletePeace.
Shit you're the only person or 'circle' to vest faith into the alternate theory.
DeleteSo what's wrong with a couple people who believe another piece of shit human being?
Mad cause they don't believe you specifically?
Dan. Did you just compare Joe Fitzgerald to Rick Dyer. Surely that was hyperbole and done for both a dramatic and proactive effect. You are far too smart to proffer such nonsense for anything other than the sake of argument. Why not, for arguments sake address the subject of what early ancestral homo genus speciation capable of interbreeding with our capable cousins was existing at the time. Surely that topic is more worthy of discussion than such debauch.
DeleteFurthermore your oft repeated reference to Joes circle has taken on a life of its own. Is Joe like AT&T. Does he in fact get discounted minutes for his Bigfooting friends? I would like to think in this ever evolving topical subject matter it would be OK to identify with a particular person or thing without having to draw a circle or rectangle or square around it for that matter. Can we all get along sufficiently that we can have a disagreeable exchange without labels. Don't get me wrong Dan. You know very well I enjoy my share of profane exchanges. But I'm calling for a little more from the field. M
DeletePeople want to see a bigfoot so badly they leave their common sense in the drawer,Dyer shall continue to make a living off bigfoot
DeleteWhat are you talking about? The 10%ers that also believe in aliens? Please! What a false statement. Your comment is what is stupid.
ReplyDeleteIn not being able to understand what you are actually trying to say, I could outline to you what's 'stupid' exactly.
Delete(Sigh)
The comment was directed to the comment above yours. Not to you. What is stupid? Lumping everyone together and making general statements that are untrue then attacking them.
DeleteYou'll get over it; easy mistake.
DeleteGood ole Joe pwning his own kind again and again from up on his pedestal, doing our job for us thanks Joe we're going to have to make you an honorary troll .. soon you'll piss off your butt buddies with your arrogance .. u so funny Joe
DeleteHA HA HA HA!!!
DeletePeace
You really don't believe theres other life in the vast universe?
DeleteCAN NOT BELIEVE THIS BLOGIS GIVING RICK MORE PUBLICITY.......STOP.
ReplyDeleteI can't believe its not butter
DeleteRick Dyer is the most credible voice in the bigfoot world... Have some respect! He is a god amongst men! I wanna touch him!
ReplyDeleteI wanna touch you after you touch him and then touch myself.
DeleteOh I don't call anybody else, oh no, oh noooooo,........!
Deletehe will confess, but not before December 1st...I gues this is just a last "joke" to fool his haters a last time (remember bigfoot baby?)...
ReplyDeleteJoe, look at this picture ( http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-g5ORdyyYQus/TyEt_fGVYuI/AAAAAAAAusM/da83Ej0gA1A/s1600/Khwit.jpg)
ReplyDeleteThat is Kwhit. He was assimilated into normal society, married and had children of his own. He neither looks like a Bigfoot, nor can one reasonably expect a Bigfoot-Baby to have been raised by modern humans and in fact marry one and have perfectly normal children.
Get your head out of your ass.
Though Kwit looks normal, his skull under analysis is far from 'normal' -
Delete*very wide eye sockets
*elevated brow ridge
*bigger teeth
*bigger jaw bone
*bigger all round
*extra bone in neck
... Furthermore, Zana, though described as having more pronounced versions of those features, was regarded as a 'wildwoman' with very human like features. This is backed up by innumerable accounts over such a long period of time. This would have then been watered down significantly in her bearing a child with a Russian man. Also, Kwit was huge and extremely strong.
And look who's making the claims? How do you know if a Bigfoot-Baby can or can't be raised by humans?! There is in fact a tribe in the PNW (I forget the name) that used to swap babies with the Bigfoot tribes and then swap back at the ages of eight years old. There are also many reports of modern day blood lines that are supposedly descended from Bigfoot, which is what I expect Sykes to pursue at some stage of his study.
Don... I have always been polite to you, I have always encouraged you to stick around and lend your opinion because I find you on the most part articulated and clever, but the way you have tried offending me and appeared extremely agitated because I have rubbed what you expected from this study in the proverbial dirt, is in contradiction of the reason why you apparently don't frequent this blog all too often.
You should stick around, you appear to be in good company.
Ego and ignorance wrapped in one.
DeleteDon and Daniel are lovers, clearly. Get a room you two!!!
DeleteStop trying to get Joe to join the triangle. No means No!!
But wow, I don't comment much and there is much talk of getting "smoked" but today???
You two got owned.
^ wants a manly threesome
DeleteDon. Perhaps it is you who requires an anal cranial ectomy. A procedure specifically designed to secure your heads removal from your own. Why would a "hybridization" event between archaic modern human and modern human produce anything other than a normal human looking child with normal viability and reproductive capacity. Certainly nothing you've said so far would sway anyone one way or the other. At any rate your voice sounds muffled. Try a megaphone.
ReplyDeleteMike, I liked it a lot better when you weren't here.
DeleteStick around. You won't be disappointed by anything save your gap toothed reflection. :)
DeleteHA HA HA HA!!!
DeleteJoe. He's right. There's really no place for me here. Drive on my brother. The wheel is yours...
DeleteMike... You stick around just fine pal, you've been sorely missed.
DeleteGood to see you post again.
Not really.He bables too much and I have a hard time understanding what he's trying to get at other than the attention of a clown.
DeleteBecause you sir are a fricking idiot.Read between the lines and then you'll understand what Mike is saying.
DeleteUm, there is nothing between the lines but white space.
Delete^
DeleteAgree.Wooooo.
Stay on Mike
DeleteJoe is asserting that Patty=Zana. I find that very incredulous. I find it hard to imagine that the offspring of a Patty creature would be completely normal looking and live a life of a normal modern human. I also find it difficult to imagine, despite copious amounts of Russian Vodka, that anyone would have felt sexual attraction to such a creature or even the desire to sexually assault such a creature. That is, of course, based on Joe's claim that Zana is a dead ringer for Patty.
ReplyDeleteAnd how do you know if Zana was sexually assaulted Don? Is this another attempt at a moral high ground to induce guilt? There are accounts that Zana got frisky when drunk.
DeleteI was accounting for both sexual attraction and sexual assault ( that has nothing to do with attraction, but more with violence and control). Given the appearance of the alleged Patty I could neither see someone aroused enough to have intercourse, nor could I even see someone wish to sexually assault such a creature.
DeleteThat was my point. It had nothing to do with moral high ground. In the Zana story there is enough moral low ground to go around for everyone. The fact that you gloat over that story is extremely sad.
Joe has no shame.
DeleteJust accept that sykes didn't give you what you want and move on.
The fact that you would latch on to a Nat Geo 'version' of events in light of there being physical evidence of Zana's description is no less sad than the amount of denial. There are accounts of Zana being integrated and accepted quite well into the community she resided. It amuses me that you can ignore a documented account of her in favor of taking on board a theory as to what she really was; furthermore typical that you should deny the physical evidence that you always request of our theory group.
DeleteA 100 years ago in the Russian region where Zana resided, were people with different viewpoints to yours now. Like I said; there are reports that she got quite drunk regularly and in a secluded area with men with more primitive ideals than our own today... How do you know what these people thought of her?
Peace.
Joe, you believe Zana looked identical to Patty, correct?
Delete8:35...
DeleteLook at what YOU expected of the study, know that that study is still in full swing and run along... You have no clue.
It is impossible for me to say I 'believe' Zana and Patty looked the same because I don't know. It is also impossible for me to say they are the same species because I don't know Patty's DNA... I can however look at the description of Zana, look at the Patty footage and then draw an assumption that they are the same looking bipeds.
DeleteI'm not talking about outdated cultural mores Joe, I am talking about bestiality-- multiple counts of it.
DeleteThat is, of course, if you think Zana looked identical to Patty. Which I am pretty sure you have said here many time, no?
If Patty were a real creature then she looks more gorilla than human. I can't imagine a scenario where anyone would be driven to want to have intercourse with a gorilla. And that even includes Frosh Week.
DeleteTake a look at the link here...
Deletehttp://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-human-side-of-bigfoot-comparing.html
... You will find a Steindorf's digital transformation of Patty. She looks perfectly human without the hair (apart from where her head sits in the shoulders).
You will also on the same page find Harvey Pratt's' artist rendition of what Patty would look like without hair... He's reported to be the best forensic artist in the country. I will also paste a comment from my research partner and friend Mike B from up top that may have eluded you...
"Why would a "hybridization" event between archaic modern human and modern human produce anything other than a normal human looking child with normal viability and reproductive capacity."
You see, neither Patty or Zana are animals. This is the whole point why I am celebrating the archaic human theory for Zana, which is now backed by one of the leading science journals in the world.
Peace.
"Draw an assumption"
DeleteGUYS JOE FINALLY DID IT! HE SAID IT!!!!
YOU'RE DRAWING AN ASSUMPTION, NOT GIVING THE PROVED REALITY!!!
Oh, and the probabilities that your assumption is correct is equal to the probability that tomorrow aliens will attack us
You do research do you Joe?
DeleteOh look at 9:08...
DeleteI think you'll find that drawing an assumption in light of me not knowing they are the same species (because I don't have the DNA results, doesn't really mean anything to the subject matter I am putting to you, quite successfully it seems (Duh?)
Yes Don, I do research... The reason why you are now drawing on insignificant's as opposed to successfully challenging the points I'm putting to you... Because I know what I'm talking about (with all due respect of course).
Peace.
And who is this guy exactly Don? Your biggest fan or something?? He hangs on every last word of yours and never really offers anything, is he someone you email to come along and watch??
DeletePeace.
Joe, copy pasting wiki articles and youtube videos is not research. How can you do Bigfoot research from Wales?
DeleteJoe, since we have no actual specimen or biological samples to study in a lab, then to be truly doing Bigfoot research you would need to be here, in N.A. in the habitat looking for Bigfoot or Bigfoot sign to study.
DeleteCopy and pasting wiki articles and youtube videos is not really the same thing, now is it?
Ha!
DeleteIt is probably the best last resort I ever hear, when people post on here about where I live, as if you need to be North American to have an interest in cryptozoology.
Nope, I am lucky enough to have friends in the field that I base a lot of my research on. My employment renders me unable to take long periods of time away to conduct sufficient field research too.
By the look of the threads, I must be doing 'something ' right in my methods... Eh Don?
Peace.
Kind of like you and MMG?
DeleteWrong again Joe. I never said you can't have an interest in cryptocrapology based on where you live. What you are doing is simply called reading. Not research. You are reading the research of others, not conducting any of your own. There is no lab research that can be done of Bigfoot right now since he is conspicuously absent. That leaves field research, and we all know you are not doing that.
DeleteAll you are doing is reading the work of others and calling it your "research"? Your opinion of other people's work is NOT research Joe. It's simply reading and having an opinion.
You could learn a lot about the moon from books and a telescope. Doesn't mean you know even remotely close to as much about it than someone who has actually been there.
DeleteAnd for the most part the "research" you are basing your opinion on is nothing more than beer bellies prancing around the woods in camos taking pictures of every bent branch and shadow.
DeleteHa!
DeleteAnd who are you exactly to suggest what Bigfoot research is or isn't? Priceless.
No Don... You can do plenty of research from an armchair and I don't know what you have been taught in Canada, but here is that definition for you;
research
rɪˈsəːtʃ,ˈriːsəːtʃ/Submit
noun
1.
the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions.
"the group carries out research in geochemistry"
synonyms: investigation, experimentation, testing, exploration, analysis, fact-finding, examination, scrutiny, scrutinization, probing; More
... You see, I research quite well, so well it seems that you are now resorting to debating with me what 'research' is, as opposed to challenging the information I have 'researched'.
It is not your place to tell anyone what research means to the Bigfoot field, it is not your place to tell me, off the back of these threads what I am doing or not doing, because it appears I am doing something right; and I'll label that 'research' just fine thank you.
9:37... Don's cheer leader...
Read your statement and think how ridiculous you have made yourself look. The ratio of people who have been to the moon is minuscule compared to those who teach the geology of the moon. It is in fact the research of those individuals that teach that subject, that have researched the work of those who have landed on the moon, that they can pursue such a career.
Oh dear...
I'm bored now.
See you all later, I'm going down the pub.
Peace.
Joe, you are still not getting it. By your own definition: what new facts have you established or new conclusions you have reached? All you do is repeat the work of others. You display zero original thought. That is not research Koe.
DeleteWhy do you think it appears that you are doing something right?
DeleteBiggest schooling EVER
Deletesynonyms: investigation, experimentation, testing, exploration, analysis, fact-finding, examination, scrutiny, scrutinization, probing
DeleteNew facts? Well I think you'll find my research has lead me to preach that Bigfoot is a human for a long time. Now we have an archaic human theory directly linked to Zana...
You could my research came good.
; )
Joe, you have suggested that bigfoot can live in the deserts of the south western United States because of the underground caverns and caves and whatnot. I guarandamntee you would not believe that if you've spent any amount of time there.
DeleteJesus, why I'm going to university then? I can be a researcher and a scientist from behind my desk! Thanks for the information Joe!
DeleteSorry Joe, where are your new conclusions and new facts? As in you didn't borrow them from someone else or read them somewhere first?
DeleteCheck the thread out for help with that.
DeleteLaters Don!
Don't need to Joe. You have presented no new conclusions or uncovered any new facts. All you do is repeat stuff other people have already said. You are not a researcher. You are at best a secondary source analyst.
DeleteRobert Lindsay is right more often than Joe.
DeleteA 'secondary source analyst' that absolutely schooled you today boyo!
DeleteSee ya later 'D-Maker'!
Oh... and Bigfoot is human.
DeleteSchooled.
Schooled, how exactly? You don't examine evidence first hand, do you? You don't have access to labs and hair or tissue samples, do you? You examine secondary sources Joe. You are fond of wiki, so let's use their definition shall we?
DeleteSecondary source: in scholarship, a secondary source is a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere...
I would say that describes you pretty well there Joe.
Oh...and Bigfoot is imaginary. Just like your "research"
DeleteSchooled.
this is the worst schooling ever made, no argument at all
Deleterefering to the Joe's last
DeleteHey Don... Here is my 'research' field I'm a part of, and check out what we have plenty of...
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVduOfaFsarC3b9Vb9R5YGA
You have a bitter tongue once you are put in your place Don; evidence it doesn't happen often... But just remember, I've had you in every little thing tonight and with the link I've posted you, I have also shown you that you can indeed 'research' when you have friends in special places that can draw from your opinion.
Watch the video and weep.
Oh and Don's cheer leader!
DeleteGive it a rest I bet you're embarrassing yourself to Don, whoever you are.
Yawn
DeleteYour rants are becoming very repetitive
DeleteSays the troll ^
DeleteLOL. Still not getting it at all are you Joe? What your friends in the Texas Hillbilly Craptozoology Society are doing could barely be called research. The fact that you sit on their shoulders and proclaim yourself a successful "researcher" is , honestly, way sadder than I ever thought you were.
DeleteSweet baby Jeebus, Joe..
I'm going to make a gifting bucket out of my old underwear tonight and put it in my backyard. Maybe a Bigfoot will wander by and leave me a treat. Then I can wake up be a researcher like Joe's friends in Texas.
DeleteOh and just for good measure, so we don't forget what Don is really upset about here...
DeleteTwo words!!
Nature ******* Journal!!!
Courtesy of your friendly cyber neighbourhood secondary source analyst.
Run along Don, ha!
DeleteYou've been served.
served by what? by the "ha"? Lame
DeleteTrying to convince Joe that his bigfoot religion is idiotic is like trying to convince Tom Cruise his scientology is idiotic. Not going to happen.
DeleteWait a minute, are you a scientologist Joe?
No Joe worships himself
DeleteIn my country, we believe in two things: copious amounts of vodka and hookers. No Zana.
ReplyDeleteDon, don't try to make sense of this. It will drive you mad. Mad, I tell you!! :)
ReplyDeleteHilarious! I can't believe he drug that out for so long! Oh how I wish I still had a fb..RD =ATTENTION WHORE lol
ReplyDeleteAre you related to that Haywood guy?
DeleteBOOBIES!!!!
DeleteYes it is I!!! Booties!! LOL I figured I'd be long forgotten lol
DeleteNever Jennifer.BOOBIES!!!
DeleteI believe the only hope of Finding Bigfoot is with Obamacare. The IRS can track down anyone and if these creatures are human then they will need to enroll in the exchanges. Not much longer to wait now, their time is running out.
ReplyDeleteBoobies * lol
DeleteHello
DeleteUh oh.Imposter alert.
DeleteI like me some big hairy ass titties!
What are ass titties?
DeleteNothing that Rick Dyer says is any more nonsensicle than the bull constantly being posted and reposted by p j . At least for a brief moment in time he had a few people and news outlets fooled. p j on the other hand fools no one except perhaps himself.
ReplyDeleteTwo words!!
DeleteNature ******* Journal!!!
You keep saying that, Joe. It obviously makes you feel better.
DeleteHAHAHAHA!!! Eveyones been fooled! The truth is... Rick Dyer is a hoax, there is no such thing as a Rick Dyer!
ReplyDeleteRick Dyer is following in the footsteps of Biscardi. When Biscardi claimed that he either was near to capturing a Bigfoot or had captured a Bigfoot in Northern California, he charged maybe $0.25 to watch the live webcams. It all turned out to be a hoax and there was a class action suit filed against Biscardi. Biscardi settled by paying back the money to whomever requested it. Out of over $2 million that came in, Biscardi only paid out less that $5000, as I recall. So Biscardi, legally, made over $2 million on a hoax. Rick Dyer just hoped to do the same thing and followed the exact same steps as Biscardi, without the live webcam.
ReplyDeleteThis has to be the most non Dick Ryder related comments I've ever seen on a Dick Ryder related post.
ReplyDelete:-)
But but me and Dick love the attention.That and taterholin each other.
Delete: ) G.W. knowz where da bigfeets beez @ in TX
ReplyDeleteLeaping Russian Yetis! Dyer lied again? Unbelievable. Inconceivable. Unthinkable!
ReplyDeletethar be a 12 gage shotgun used – dang critters, followed up shots – slugs rounds and take that thar bigfoot down. Thar beez bigfeets abouts for sure, so beez awares they travel in groups. U getz one of them thar critters others be on U. take plenty of ammo and a few buds for backup!
ReplyDeleteHey guys, just got back from a long vacation. Just want to know, did Sykes prove Bigfoot exist? Thanks ahead.
ReplyDeleteAsk Joe.He'll tell you.
DeleteSlavebearfoot
DeleteOld Joe, say getz U a shotgun, buy U a shotgun, takes u a shotgun fo U protection - bigfoots that beez deep in the woods.
ReplyDelete