M.K. Davis Discusses The Mississippi Skunk Ape Video
If you haven't checked out ParaBreakdown's version of the Mississippi skunk ape footage, watch it here. For a different perspective, here's M.K. Davis discussing the hotly debated video:
If you haven't checked out ParaBreakdown's version of the Mississippi skunk ape footage, watch it here. For a different perspective, here's M.K. Davis discussing the hotly debated video:
~First~
ReplyDeleteMy first MK! I's so excited!
DeleteThank you for your time
DeleteSecond
ReplyDeleteMMC
Need DSL. Network is slow
DeleteJoe, I own a book about historical giants from all over the world, it also discusses some other stranger theories as to the origin of giants. Title, "Giants, Master Builders of Prehistoric and Ancient Civilizations" By Stephen Quayle. It's worth a look.
ReplyDeleteJoe, I have read all of the reports you have been pasting on here somewhere before... I can't remember if it's from a book I own or some website(s) I visited, please share as it's driving me nuts.
DeleteHey Rush!! I'm sooooo happy you find this stuff fascinating!! Some of the later stuff I posted was from Nephilim Chronicles by Fritz Zimmerman.
DeleteI've checked out some Stephen Quayle a while ago... I'll check out some more!!
Thank you Rush, means a lot!!!
It's more than fascinating once you delve into the subject, another interesting read is "Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men" By, Joseph P. Farrell. I'll check out Fritz Zimmerman and will email you to carry on the discussion, Peace!!
DeleteMuch, much respect Rush and I'll do the same!!
DeleteI keep reading here about reports of giant skeletons. Can anyone tell me where there is one of these "giant skeletons" on display right now? I don't want to hear about a Smithsonian cover-up or old news-paper articles. I would like to know WHERE one can find a giant (over eight foot tall) skeleton that represents a supposed race of giants. I am talking about a real legitimate physical skeleton that has been examined by experts. Is there such a thing anywhere?
DeleteIf it was a case of us all finding out what did and didn't 'want' to hear then we all would love in a happy little world together skipping and singing with bunny rabbits... but the truth is there is a cover up of such skeletons and has been for many, many decades. If you come across any such skeletons, they will be promoted as being humans with gigantism.
DeletePeace.
In other words - no. So I guess the truth is there are no physical remains one can examine unless one subscribes to the conspiracy cover-up explanation. Which begs the question - why on earth would the scientific community want to cover this up? I would think any scientist would love to have his name on such a discovery.
DeleteNo... The truth is, regardless of how you want to put a spin on things, is that whenever these remains are found, there is a direct link to institutions such as the Smithsonian.
DeleteWhy would they cover it up? Because you cannot destroy a civilisation and make way for your own, and celebrate one the same time. Also, biological remains being confirmed would cause many to request a suficient investigation and effort from mainstream science to set aside habitat; causing the logging industry to collapse in major parts of the country.
You cannot deny archeological, anthropological and scientific studies that have been documented for a 100 years.
If you can't handle that, then my advice to you is simply: deal with it.
I happen to put some stock in a cover-up as there are just too many news articles etc. especially the more recent Romanian finds where it was all over their News, then suddenly all of the skeletons "disappeared". To me there are just too many reports and historical accounts of these skeletal finds to believe they are all false.
DeleteAs far as why, there could be several reasons. It would throw a huge wrench in an already weak evolutionary storyline as well as several other mainstream versions of history. Give it time, it will come out. "Science", by its very nature is very reluctant to open pandora's boxes even when true. History has shown us that already. It really isn't that far fetched, just a different period of history.
Yo Curious, follow your curiosity and read one of the books mentioned by Joe or myself, I dare you. Why would they cover these kinds of things up? Even if I told you, you wouldn't believe. Do some reading, it really helps.
DeleteI can easily deal with it Joe - thanks for the advice. So in conclusion you have nothing solid outside of your belief and conspiracy theories.
DeleteAs M.K.Davis would say "I thank you for your time".
Acknowledgement of giant skeletons would also lend credence to many folktales, and Old Testament stories, something which science wouldn't be in a hurry to do. They don't want physical evidence supporting stories which they've mostly poo-pooed for a century or more.
DeleteIt is often shown though that folktales and the like have a basis in truth, that some aspects of some of them are factual.
It's hard for an individual to prove a cover up and the existence of hidden evidence.
But one possible example was a fairly recent BFRO report from a woman in Washington State who claimed to have hit a bigfoot with her car. She got home and called 911. She went back to the scene later and found a piece of her vehicle but nothing else. She called the police again that day asking what they had found when they responded to her 911 call. She was told there was no record of her 911 call. She was told there was no record of the incident. The incident ceased to exist and she could get no information.
Some other bigfoot reports tally with the results this woman got from the authorities. As you see, obviously the record of her 911 call should exist; they could simply have said they found nothing at the scene, but went further to claim there was no call, and no incident.
A scientist would love to put his/her name to a giant skeleton discovery? Such a scientist might be pilloried and find himself further unemployable. How then to earn a living and survive? This surely is a consideration to many, who decide to avoid the subject and related evidence.
Why cover up? If there is a cover up, implications for evolution/science and religion could be reasons why. Other aspects of the creatures, if they exist, could be other reasons why.
That's the whole point of a cover-up or conspiracy... It makes it pretty hard to request such things.
DeleteHeck... Most of the people working in the Smithsonian probably don't even know that's in their vaults. As time has gone on and the industrial revolution churned up all the previously inhabited fertile Native ground... And all knowledge of advanced cultures eroded, it's down to people like me then to get called the nut-job for pointing at official study documents and printed news media.
The history books don't lie and when you see account upon account linking directly to places like the Smithsonian, then you have the responsibility to either express that, or swallow the BS.
I'd rather be labeled a nut job than swallow the BS.
Curious... I mean that as respectinly as I possibly can.
Peace.
Very interesting Joe and Rusherlife, and with what I have seen, heard, and been subject to in my life it seems quite plausible. Steven Quayle is a regular on C2C AM and I have heard him several times, but have not heard him talk of the giants. However there is no doubt in my mind that ancient history is far from what is assumed as gospel by main stream academia. Just way to many artifacts and ancient sites that can not be explained away.
DeleteChuck
"Most of the people working in the Smithsonian probably don't even know that's in their vaults."
DeleteWell, damn....let's all be thankful then that PJ knows what's in vaults at the Smithsonian. Thanks, PJ. You enlighten us all every day.
That's ok, you're very welcome.
DeleteSchooled.
Here's a problem: We know that hoaxes and tales about giants were a fad in the 19th century, just as hoaxing and lying about bigfoot is a pastime for many today..The problem is then, how do I know which of these old stories Joe has been sharing with us are plausible and which are obvious tabloid hoaxes..?
DeleteShaqs a big dude
DeleteI would genuinely like to see a list of those 19th century hoaxes.
DeleteInternet and the money accumilated on hits, that and popular culture is the reason why there are hoaxes today. Sure, there's always a chance that some of the old tales might be fabricated, but when you look at the sheer quantity of accounts, and the type of research studies that are being quoted, then you have to look beyond that and ask would there really be so much information if there was nothing to it?
Peace.
..I was thinking of the Cardiff Giant Hoax, Joe..I figure the guy didn't pull the idea out of his ass, so these kinds of stories must have been making the rounds..You agree that some are probably bullshit, and again I ask how do you tell the difference? Its not like the reporters are still around and people that are good at judging veracity can question them...I guess the best one can do is say, like you did, that given the quantity some of these accounts are likely to be genuine...
DeleteIf you really want to know what happened to the skeletons you have to go back and read Ales Hrdelicka's bio. He was one of the founding fathers of eugenics. A monster of a man. A pure racist. And one of the founding fathers of the Smithsonian s cover up. He overloaded grave robbing and made sure that none of these skeletons saw the light of day. It was almost 40 years of lies, deception and cover up. And for the most part it was his brainchild. A real Franenstein. Nothing less. M
DeleteHis policies continued after his death for many years and some suggest they still exist today. Step into my lab and lay upon my slab so to speak. Joe. Email me if you wish to know more. But I warn you. Very disturbing.
DeletePatterson pwns you all
ReplyDeleteGreat stuff MK!!
DeleteKeep up the good work bro!!!!!!
Yep, Marlon nailed it again and trolls will whine.
DeleteBan hammer, ban hammer, ban hammer, ban hammer!!!!
ReplyDeleteThey need to bring in big ginger!
ReplyDeleteDID YOU HEAR ABOUT THE PYRIMID THEY FOUND IN ECUADOR,THEY BELIEVE IT WAS MADE BY GIANTS OVER 4,600 YEARS AGO.
ReplyDeleteI will check that out... But check out the Alaskan Pyramid stuff on YouTube.
DeleteLinda Moulton Howe.
Peace.
OK,THANKS JOE.....MICHAEL.
DeleteJoe is a a synonym for slapping your hand against your forehead. What a tool.
DeleteI MEAN PYRAMID!
ReplyDeletedo u pricks just ignore the film and ramble inane shite all the time?
ReplyDeleteI realise the chance there are monkeypeople roaming north America is proven to be utter shit,leaves u pricks with nothing to jerk off about, surely even you lot realise u are coming across as little dweebs
I imagine you are a mixture of children[the content tells us that], pedos[the fact theres children here will attract them and encourage them to groom u]and utter wankers
which group are u in?
ps if you have any EVIDENCE of giant apepeople to post link! try and avoid the p/g hoax,thats too easy
We knew this was coming from the raging, frustrated skeptards: Paragraph three of 10:25 comment contains the vilest of all accusations. This accusation is typical of raging hating skeptards when they have hit the wall and have nothing left. It is the language of the defeated and demolished.
DeleteThe skeptards fight and fight, gnash their teeth, throw out every kind of false information their deluded minds can feed them, and when the homo-living-in-momma's-basement allegations and the strings of junior high school level obscenities run out, the skeptards always without fail turn to the attack of paragraph three.
Once the skeptards have nothing left, they always turn to their last resort, which is the phony accusation in paragraph three. It's too bad this particular attack has become predictable, but time and time again skeptards have shown it to be their last ditch cry, a wailing amidst their final throes of defeat and humiliation.
10:25 sounds like Caniel Dampbell as he self-destructed in uncontrollable spasms of rage.
I've for some stuff to post that clown now... See if he likes it.
Delete10:25 obviously isn't concerned about children visiting this site, as his comment is riddled with seven obscenities.
DeleteDon't bother Joe,a lot of anger there thats probably not bigfoot related
DeleteHey Rush,Barrackman answered the questionaire
DeleteEmkay Davis remins me of those really terrible movie pirates and their substandard quality videos I would buy downtown and totally feel ripped off when someone in the movie theatre would stand up and you'd see their shadow. I'm glad he doesn't do porn
ReplyDeleteTo the moderator...
ReplyDeleteARE YOU HAPPY TO LEAVE THIS FILTH ON HERE????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joe with all respect,STFU.
DeletePlease leave Joe, AND GOD BLESS ROBERT E. LEE!!!
DeleteI am taking joe side on this one. It's just total crap posting.
Deleteyep agreed.
DeleteYep, even I can agree with PJ on this one. A little ribbing back and forth is harmless. But, the racist garbage is uncalled for.
DeleteYGNALI
ditto ^^^^^^
Delete..Instead of crying out for moderation, why not just scroll past an obvious (genuine) trolling post without comment...Yeesh, you guys sound as if you never blogged before...
DeleteYou would remove shit off your shoe(genuine) fuck head.
DeleteHa ha, you nailed it! ^
Delete^
DeleteThanx, I do know how to blog.
To the moderator. We find Joes 200,000 word cut and paste posts just as profane as the post at 9:21 by an anon. Please ban BOTH now.
ReplyDeleteCollected Accounts of James Mooney (1861-1921), tells of the visit of very tall people from the west:
DeleteJames Wafford, of the western Cherokee, who was born in Georgia in 1806, says that his grandmother, who must
have been born about the middle of the last century, told him that she had heard from the old people that long before
her time a party of giants had once come to visit the Cherokee. They were nearly twice as tall as common men, and
had their eyes set slanting in their heads, so that the Cherokee called them Tsunil´ kalu´, "the Slant-eyed people,"
because they looked like the giant hunter Tsul´ kalu´. They said that these giants lived far away in the direction in
which the sun goes down. The Cherokee received them as friends, and they stayed some time, and then returned to
their home in the west...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ban Joe! Ban Joe! Trollandia demands it!
DeleteModerator?
Delete^ obviously asleep.
Deletelols...Ban Shawn and anyone else who has access to the top of the page..COMMENTS ONLY...
DeleteJoe fits are u going to start a Bigfoot blog??
ReplyDeleteJoe fits are u going to start a Bigfoot blog??
ReplyDeleteJoe fits are u going to start a Bigfoot blog??
ReplyDeleteI usually pick these videos apart but this one is interesting and if a fake pretty well done.
ReplyDeleteLet's get this conversation back on track - ok here goes...
ReplyDeleteThey're a kind of people...
I keep my poop in a jar...
Sally here...
Really all the crap I say and that's what gets erased
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWhat's with all the bad words does anyone monitor this site??? This is terrible get these kind of people off here please !!! Have a good night everyone Canadian guy!!
ReplyDeleteWhat's with all the bad words does anyone monitor this site??? This is terrible get these kind of people off here please !!! Have a good night everyone Canadian guy!!
ReplyDeletethe Sasquatch genomes were novel and fell well outside of known ancient hominin as well as ape sequences,” explains Ketchum
ReplyDeleteTitties
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete