Listening To These Sounds Gave Me Goosebumps


This sound was captured somewhere in Canada last January. Listening closely and you'll probably come to the same conclusion. It's either HAARP, polar shift with sonic waves, cosmic energy, aliens, or Bigfoot!



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. train, or heavy equipment miles away, in cold weather sound travels far, and bounces in valleys to sound hollow and odd, but the repetition seems like a train, on some curve/grade far away..

      Delete
    2. If you want to go that route, you have to make quite a few assumptions about where this video was recorded.
      Judging from their accents, I'm guessing they are in eastern Canada, and considering the amount of snow, they are not near the coast.

      With that, I can guess they may be in Ontario, or Quebec, where there is an almost literal shield of mountains and valleys, which sound could travel.

      Conclusion: It's more then likely a train.

      Delete
  2. I'm sorry, those sounds are one of the craziest things I've heard in a very long time.

    Peace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It starts off like a sort of 'metalic ape laughter' and then just get's nasty!

      Perplexed?

      Delete
    2. Solar wind banging against and scrubbing the earths protective magnetic shield. It's very windy up there

      Or it's a big monster

      MMC

      Delete
    3. Or it's a farkin' train a couple miles down the canyon.

      But no, bigfoot makes WAY more sense...

      Delete
  3. Why no evidence for bigfoot but plenty of excuses why there isn't any?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nobody's making excuses, except for the people in denial of evidence... Like you.

      Delete
    2. What evidence?

      And before you copy paste your usual crap let me just say that isn't actually evidence by the way.

      Delete
    3. If you are saying there is evidence of bigfoot in nature journal then you have truly lost your mind.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Zana Bigfoot - physical evidence in Kwit - archaic human DNA Sykes - archaic human DNA Nature Journal - Bigfoot are human.

      ... Glad I could help.

      Delete
    6. Zana 100% modern human so no different to me or you.

      Khwits skull also well within normal human proportions.

      Archaic humans.. nothing we didn't know already. No idea where the leap to bigfoot comes from there.

      Delete
    7. Zana who is described as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws . Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately...

      Back up evidence? Kwit's skull. Unusual features of Kwits skull -
      *very wide eye sockets (nocturnal vision)
      *elevated brow ridge
      *extra bone in neck
      *bigger all round
      *bigger teeth
      *bigger jaw bone
      *all this could suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins

      "Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"

      - Dr Bryan Sykes' thought provoking alternative notion (Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project and active member of Bigfootology)

      "All humans whose ancestry originates outside of Africa owe about 2% of their genome to Neanderthals; and certain populations living in Oceania, such as Papua New Guineans and Australian Aboriginals, got about 4% of their DNA from interbreeding between their ancestors and Denisovans, who are named after the cave in Siberia’s Altai Mountains where they were discovered. The cave contains remains deposited there between 30,000 and 50,000 years ago. Those conclusions however were based on low-quality genome sequences, riddled with errors and full of gaps, David Reich, an evolutionary geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts said at the meeting. His team, in collaboration with Svante Pääbo at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, have now produced much more complete versions of the Denisovan and Neanderthal genomes — matching the quality of contemporary human genomes. The high-quality Denisovan genome data and new Neanderthal genome both come from bones recovered from Denisova Cave. The new Denisovan genome indicates that this enigmatic population got around: Reich said at the meeting that they interbred with Neanderthals and with the ancestors of human populations that now live in China and other parts of East Asia, in addition to Oceanic populations, as his team previously reported. Most surprisingly, Reich said, the new genomes indicate that Denisovans interbred with another extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia more than 30,000 years ago, which is neither human nor Neanderthal.

      The meeting was abuzz with conjecture about the identity of this potentially new population of humans. “We don’t have the faintest idea,” says Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the London Natural History Museum, who was not involved in the work. He speculates that the population could be related to Homo heidelbergensis, a species that left Africa around half a million years ago and later gave rise to Neanderthals in Europe. “Perhaps it lived on in Asia as well,” Stringer says.

      - Nature Journal.

      Delete
    8. Once again joe leaping from human to bigfoot. Crazy.

      Delete
    9. Bigfoot is archaic human.

      What's 'crazy', is you prioritizing your time to come here to say the same...

      "Zana 100% modern human so no different to me or you... Khwits skull also well within normal human proportions..."

      ... Crap everyday, when it's versions, lies and denial. Every time you come here and preach the same crap... I will be here to preach back. Change your tune or go away and you won't have to see my pastes any longer.

      Delete
    10. How is that crap?

      Its a fact that zana is 100% modern human. Deal with it.

      Delete
    11. Yes... 100% archaic modern human, numpty.

      Delete
    12. Fucking clueless^

      It's 100% modern human. Putting the word "archaic" in front of it changes nothing. And how you then make the leap to bigfoot I guess only your psychiatrist knows.

      Delete
    13. Actually read my comments and know that I have answered everyone of your concerns comprehensively.

      Glad I could help.

      Delete
    14. No you haven't, asshat. It's why people have issues with you, seemingly more and more people supposed to be on your side. As time passes you alienate more and more people.

      Throwing around the word archaic is all fine and dandy but anon is right, it doesn't change 100% modern homo sapien sapien.

      If bigfoot does exist as reported, it's definently not 100% modern human.

      Thing is there is no conclusive evidence. Nothing but old stories, shady eyewitness accounts, and unscientific research.

      I'm sorry you accept those as fact and the truth because the real world doesn't. It doesn't even matter IF they really are true because the burden of proof still remains to find conclusive proof of Sasquatch and no one has come close.

      Zana was a 100% black woman, you racist POS. Every time you continue posting your false stories, you keep perpetuating that racism.

      Her DNA is 100% modern homo sapien sapien, her son was a completely normal human being, his kids, and all descendants are normal human beings.

      PJ seems to grasp on to any new piece of information as 100% fact bigfoot exists. He has bigfoot on the brain. If you put him in a padded white cell, he would still see bigfoot. Hell, he may even pray to him.

      PJ hasn't seen a fact since primary school. I think he forgets what they are.

      Delete
    15. Zana who is described as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws . Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately...

      Back up evidence? Kwit's skull. Unusual features of Kwits skull -
      *very wide eye sockets (nocturnal vision)
      *elevated brow ridge
      *extra bone in neck
      *bigger all round
      *bigger teeth
      *bigger jaw bone
      *all this could suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins

      "Maybe she isn't an African of recent origin at all but one from a migration out of Africa, maybe many tens of thousands of years ago, and that she comes from a relic population taking refuge in the Caucases mountains"

      - Dr Bryan Sykes' thought provoking alternative notion (Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project and active member of Bigfootology)

      "All humans whose ancestry originates outside of Africa owe about 2% of their genome to Neanderthals; and certain populations living in Oceania, such as Papua New Guineans and Australian Aboriginals, got about 4% of their DNA from interbreeding between their ancestors and Denisovans, who are named after the cave in Siberia’s Altai Mountains where they were discovered. The cave contains remains deposited there between 30,000 and 50,000 years ago. Those conclusions however were based on low-quality genome sequences, riddled with errors and full of gaps, David Reich, an evolutionary geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts said at the meeting. His team, in collaboration with Svante Pääbo at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, have now produced much more complete versions of the Denisovan and Neanderthal genomes — matching the quality of contemporary human genomes. The high-quality Denisovan genome data and new Neanderthal genome both come from bones recovered from Denisova Cave. The new Denisovan genome indicates that this enigmatic population got around: Reich said at the meeting that they interbred with Neanderthals and with the ancestors of human populations that now live in China and other parts of East Asia, in addition to Oceanic populations, as his team previously reported. Most surprisingly, Reich said, the new genomes indicate that Denisovans interbred with another extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia more than 30,000 years ago, which is neither human nor Neanderthal.

      The meeting was abuzz with conjecture about the identity of this potentially new population of humans. “We don’t have the faintest idea,” says Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the London Natural History Museum, who was not involved in the work. He speculates that the population could be related to Homo heidelbergensis, a species that left Africa around half a million years ago and later gave rise to Neanderthals in Europe. “Perhaps it lived on in Asia as well,” Stringer says.

      - Nature Journal.

      Delete
    16. Hey Joe and MMG,
      If you have so much evidence go get 10 million dollars.

      Didn't think so.
      Smoked.

      King of Reality

      Delete
    17. No matter how many times you copy and paste, it doesn't make bigfoot real or even remotely prove it's existence.

      All you have on Zana is old stories, contradicted by her actual 100% modern human DNA. You don't have a single bone of Zana.

      Khwit and the rest of the descendants are completely normal modern human beings. No nocturnal vision, no infrasound capabilities, no inter dimensional travel, none of it. In fact, all three are distinctly inhuman attributes.

      Humans project themselves into monsters, it's how many of the legendary literary works got started. If we project ourselves as monsters, we'd be 8ft tall, 900lbs, hairy, super strog ninja nocturnal people.

      Nature has nothing to say about bigfoot or any of your points.

      Everyone please hold your laughter at PJ, it's not his fault his mother abandoned him as a child.

      Delete
    18. Nice answer Joe. That's exactly what I thought. You wouldn't have one.

      I win.

      King of Reality

      Delete
    19. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    20. HA HA HA HA HA!!!

      Dance Ball Boy and Klown! I've got you by your short and curlies!!

      Delete
    21. Guise...guise...guise. Bigfoot is real and we proved it! Just don't tell the world...or anyone else for that matter.

      Finding Bigfoot still going, Sykes continues to test, Brookreson chasing baboons in Texas, Kelly Shaw tracking a pod of black people through the Mormon wilds, Smeja shedding tears for the juvenile, Randles getting coyote hair 9ft up a tree on a track line....

      Spike TV lining up 10 million just for conclusive evidence. Hell, might as well cancel the show. Send Michael Merchant back home because PJ has got this ladies and gentlemen.

      Please. You know that interbreeding isn't even fact yet? Still two camps on that one as well.

      But hey, armchair researcher PJ Taterjoe is on the case and has proved Figboot through a series of rigorous tater expeditions.

      Delete
    22. "Throwing around the word archaic is all fine and dandy but anon is right, it doesn't change 100% modern homo sapien sapien."

      ... It does when a geneticist suggests it is possible to have a relic population of that species.

      "If bigfoot does exist as reported, it's definently not 100% modern human."

      ... Claim! You don't get to say what this creature is... Because you lie and spread filth to suit your agenda, and we have a the skull of a son of a Bigfoot that sequences as modern human.

      "Thing is there is no conclusive evidence. Nothing but old stories, shady eyewitness accounts, and unscientific research."

      ... Yawn, don't you get bored of screaming that in the mirror? Shady eyewitness accounts that are backed up with physical evidence in Kwit you mean??

      "... the burden of proof still remains to find conclusive proof of Sasquatch and no one has come close."

      You need to prove that the sources of evidence are not what they are first, not scream in the mirror they aren't there.

      "Zana was a 100% black woman, you racist POS. Every time you continue posting your false stories, you keep perpetuating that racism."

      Stating that Zana's descriptions were mere racism is in fact a slap in the face for such a cause and I don't appreciate you using that to gain a moral high ground (you of all people) to ignite guilt as opposed to actually challenging the theories I have posed... Regardless of how little left you have to go by.

      "All you have on Zana is old stories, contradicted by her actual 100% modern human DNA. You don't have a single bone of Zana."

      ... We don't have Zana no, but we have Kwit who has the watered down features. Schooled... We also have the archaic human theory to explain the results and a back up source that these populations existed. I don't see you contesting Nature... Or the archaic human theory anymore... HA HA HA HA!!

      "Khwit and the rest of the descendants are completely normal modern human beings. No nocturnal vision, no infrasound capabilities, no inter dimensional travel, none of it. In fact, all three are distinctly inhuman attributes."

      ... For this, Mike B...

      "Why would a "hybridization" event between archaic modern human and modern human produce anything other than a normal human looking child with normal viability and reproductive capacity."

      "Humans project themselves into monsters, it's how many of the legendary literary works got started."

      ... I think you'll find that these creatures have been reported on every continent for hundreds of years, and that isn't anthropomorphism (you learnt something new there), or psychology, but more credence that these populations are indeed thriving.

      ... Think that's everything...

      Schooled.

      Delete
    23. Ball boy...

      You got hurt yesterday and it seems yo have the same old dribble today. For this; I'll refer you again to Rule number 2 of Militant Tardism...

      "If you can't debunk any sources of evidence, merely deny it is there and repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Repeat... Yawn..."

      Textbook Crampz.

      Delete
  4. Creepy ass shit. Dimensions opening?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^nah just your mom's taterhole

      Delete
    2. ^ confuses his mouth , with moms taterhole, ^ (clive squatchy)..

      Delete
  5. Weird vocal acoustics in what looks like a gully.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Greatest hoaxes revealed yet again showed the pgf is a hoax. They even have an audio interview with Patterson and he comes accross as a hoaxer conman.

    They show that a human can indeed fit in the suit and there is nothing special about the arm proportions.

    Then there was the excellent x creatures show with the highly credited biologist chris packham who yet again showed it a hoax even with gimlin acknowledging he could have been hoaxed.

    Then we had bigfoot files with mark Evans and sykes. Evidence that footers would bet their life on is from a bigfoot comes back as known animals. That is truly the final death knell.

    Face it you are following a religion founded by a bloke in a suit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes monkey suits are proven to exist and can be tailored to any required specification.

      Delete
    2. No, no... Got magic miraculous monkey suit?

      Delete
    3. Got monkey man? Didn't think so. You don't even have a lead to his whereabouts.

      Delete
    4. Well of you can't provide a magic, miraculous, amazing, world beating, pioneering ahead of it's day by 46 years monkey suit... Then there is your 'monkey man'.

      You are getting increasingly easy as you are angry.

      Delete
    5. Who needs a suit from a film 46 years ago when we have 10,000 years of ZERO figbeets? Not even a shred of biological material from one.

      That's good enough for me.

      Delete
    6. Looking like Dan has this under control. Why do you like getting smoked, schooled, and tater drilled every day Joe? Plain and simple, if there was all this evidence you have, and it was actually valid, there wouldn't be a 10 million dollar bounty out there for JUST EVIDENCE.


      King of Reality

      Delete
    7. Balll boy...

      You need a suit from 46 years ago because if there is no such thing, that is your evidence... Or at least one source of it.

      (Duh?)

      Klown...

      "AnonymousWednesday, November 20, 2013 at 9:41:00 AM PST
      Don and Daniel are lovers, clearly. Get a room you two!!!

      Stop trying to get Joe to join the triangle. No means No!!

      But wow, I don't comment much and there is much talk of getting "smoked" but today???

      You two got owned."

      ... It must have been hard to see your hero get a little toyed with yesterday. I still see nothing from either you or him to counter the points I've made up top, other than... Amusingly, a little story from Nat Geo. Didn't someone say Footers really on rumors and lies??

      I have science to back up my claims... You have dreams and bad language.

      You are getting easier and easier.

      Delete
  7. GOOD MORNING VIETKONG lets get down brass tacks bitches 2 days left till we get this shit over with have a good day at work or on your couch whatever the case may be

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BANDINI, GO LOOK AT THE COMMENT SECTION ON THE DYER THREAD SHAWN POSTED EARLIER! WE HAVE A STALKER!




      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    2. What are you talkin about all caps did they erase the messages or something

      Delete
    3. Regardless I've got a concealed weapons permit and Florida has the loosest stand you ground law you seen the Zimmerman case

      Delete
    4. SORRY TO TAKE SO LONG TO GET BACK TO YOU BUDDY! RICK DYER HAD STOPPED BY TO VOICE HIS OPINION.. LOL





      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    5. Oh LOL I seen that is that the real or fake original Rick

      Delete
  8. No not real bigfoot noises. If you want to hear Bigfoots listen to rap music. Zana was the queen of rap.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That guy just talks to much, if it was real he wouldn't do that, conclusion probably fake.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Joe fitz Canadian guy ! That's are chipmunks talking to each other!! Lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HA HA HA HA!! What do you think it could be???

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. TTL...

      Is this you posting about a shooting down below??

      Delete
  11. That's Canadian. Bears with the runs lol!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PART ONE!!!!!!!!!(Finnally Shot One) This is a 3 part post, we thought this would be the best place to reveal what happen this Sunday at 10.30 am when the first shot of 9 shots were fired! So we were all speed out in are very remote location and I'll never forget the call on the radio " help guys, there here, come now!" and right after that the first shot was fired from 506 yards hitting the first subject in the upper leg disabling the male were he could still walk but not very well, and the others scattered but not far! Shortly after the first shot we herd two more shots fired and it felt like my legs were turning into rubber trying to get to my friend to help him out yet we had all prepared for this situation happening just never thought it was going to be this day! We had 5 guys in total heading to help him and it was like slow motion for everyone at the time! I will be posting the rest of our day either today labeled part two and three everyone's going to loose there marbles we finally did it!! So enjoy the next posts coming!!!

      Delete
    2. Were you hunting in Harlem?

      Delete
    3. Where are you located so we can report the murder of a modern human?

      Delete
    4. Part 2 and 3 this afternoon,sorry I was short on part one! This is much better than. Justin saga, we have lots of pictures, video etc but I'm working so u just have to wait!

      Delete
    5. I have inside information and all I can tell you is that something BIG is going to be presented!!!!!!!!!!!!

      IT'S GOING TO BLOW YOUR FREAKING MINDS!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    6. Another modern human I presume.

      Delete
    7. thar beez barr in da woods, forsure barrs

      Delete
  12. Hey joe why no unambiguous photos of bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because it is very difficult to attain a clear picture of a fast moving, master of their environment & terrain creature, under such emotions from the eye witness, to which can always be in the eyes of skeptics; 'a man in a suit'. Who's to say that out of all the blobsquatches that have been photographed that there aren't countless actual Bigfoot within.

      How anyone can require get better than Patty is beyond me.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. "fast moving, master of their environment & terrain creature"


      Erm but wait a minute that doesnt describe patty in the slightest and you claim it to be a bigfoot.

      Delete
    3. That's because Patty was an exceptionally rare case of being caught off-guard that though can be backed up with many eyewitness accounts, is a rare gem in footage; so rare nothing has been as good since. She reacts exactly the same way a human would caught out of her comfort zone (not in the brush for cover), and walks away calmly so as to not agitate the two people covering her; one with a gun and the other with a camera (for all she knew the camera was a gun also). You must remember that the two chasing her lost all trace her after a few hundred yards.

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. So rare that it only happened the one time a known conman and bigfoot promoter rocked up with a camera in hand.... yea....lol footers are so gullible.

      Delete
    5. Where is your evidence that Roger Patterson was a conman? Is that the same level of hearsay, rumor and lies that skeptics claim Footery is based around? Patterson was a researcher that was following up reports of Bigfoot in that area. It amuses me that someone should be condemned for providing the one thing skeptics desire; purely because he was successful.

      Oh, and for a matching specimen; here's a link...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTddczieNdQ

      ... This subject in this video is younger, a male, and probably a little more agitated than surprised.

      Glad I could help.

      Delete
    6. The fact that he filmed a bloke in a suit and claims its a creature that doesn't exist is the evidence. So naive joe.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous, you just got the sheets pulled over you by Joe. The proper answer to Joe's question in which he tried to change the subject, is another question. Hey Joe,
      Where is the verifiable evidence?

      Didn't think so.

      Schooled.


      King of Reality

      Delete
    8. I tell you where it is... Klown... It's in your inability to provide at least something even a good as the suit you claim there is.

      This is getting too easy...

      Delete
  13. Morn. Joe. You are not the only one perplex by these sounds. Fact is in the past couple of years they are being heard around the world, and the legitimate ones seem to be coming from the sky. Linda Moulton Howe has looked into it. I heard some good recordings on Ground Zero/Clyde Lewis radio show a few weeks back. For now it is another phenomena taking place much like the crop circles that started appearing 25 years ago.

    Peace Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chuck!!

      I have yet to hear them this clearly though... It's almost as if it's a metallic ape sound which is very, very bizarre?! What it develops into is just weird???

      I've been looking a little for that video for you, no joy yet... I'll keep looking.

      Peace bro.

      Delete
    2. I hear something just like this in the Sierras this year, then traveled 20 miles into Feather River Canyon to see the train grinding thru, the metal wheels screeching the most unearthly sound..for a very long time...a very long train

      Delete
    3. Linda Moulton Howe sucks wrinkly ball sacks for useless UFO information. How she is an expert in anything other than old wrinkly man balls. I haven't the faintest

      Delete
  14. G.W. knows abouts these in TX!

    ReplyDelete
  15. thar be a 12 gage shotgun used – dang critters, followed up shots – slugs rounds and take that thar bigfoot down. Thar beez bigfeets abouts for sure, so beez awares they travel in groups. U getz one of them thar critters others be on U. take plenty of ammo and a few buds for backup!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We here takes AKs to goez huntin for them critters and others like bigfoot and mega hogs take lots of ammo and mags : )

      Delete
    2. put enough lead into anything and its DEAD....
      lots of ammo and mags

      Delete
    3. AK with bipod and drum mag for max fire on bigfoot. Should take care of the big guy!

      Delete
  16. World renowned spiritual teacher, psychic icon, author, and lecturer Sylvia Celeste Browne passed away at 7:10am this morning (Wednesday, November 20) at Good Samaritan Hospital in San Jose, CA. Born October 19, 1936, Browne was 77 years old.

    SON OF A BITCH! I prepaid $17,5000 to get a reading over the phone sometime between 2014 and 2020. FML :-(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. did she predict her death? or, get whacked, as she would say?

      Delete
    2. Maybe she will let someone channel her so we can find out

      Delete
    3. Yes, she did predict that she would die--11 years from now.

      Delete
  17. Rosie is in the box folks I repeat rosie is in the box.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, Daisy was a hoax...but Rosie is the real deal!!

      More details to come

      Delete
  18. Part 2 of 3 ( after the shot will call it ) sorry its taking long here but I'm working and after this weekend were going to have a couple busy weeks to come and just so everyone knows we cut off from the knee down, my good friend we call the ( ninja) or in this case he was the butcher did the dirty work and he also hacked out part of the skull among other parts so if the men in black come they can take what's left !! Anyways to begin part two ! I'll be back in ten to 15 minutes something just came up here sorry guys and girls

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Part 2 of 3 ( after the shot) I'm going to really shorten this up or I'll be talking for 2 hours. We finally met up with our buddy will call him m1 and he told us there's three of them 500 yards towards some bushes witch we could not figure out, so M1 stayed were he shot from and then guided us with hand signals and radio if we had to use it, there was about 2 inches of snow on the ground so when we got to we're he wanted us we found blood and hundreds of tracks! Before we got there we new one had been shot in the upper leg and had limbed behind somewhere but the blood trail had stopped at one point and there was so many tracks we had to rethink what we were doing so we started a grid pattern because the area that these 3 guys were hid ding in was only about 300 by 300 yards and the scary part during are grid search was at different points we could here them creeping around! We new one was wounded bad and would probably bleed out then all of a sudden bang! Bang! Bang! One had came out behind my friend and he fired three shots hitting the same one or a different one in the upper right leg with his semi auto!! And then lost sight of that one all together and the bush lit up agian with footsteps it was so scary are harts were beating out of are chests! Got to go agian sorry all try and rap it all up in part 3 maybe have to do a part 4

      Delete
  19. We here takes AKs to goez huntin for them thar critters and others like bigfoot and mega hogs lots of ammo and mags : )

    ReplyDelete
  20. Part 3 I'll post later I too busy but these animals can be killed cause we got one and it's in the freezer, well actually in two freezers cause there shoulders are so big but I'll tell the rest of the kill later got to go back to work and I now u guys are going to like to how we finally killed one and what the others did when we pulled it out of the bush, probably not what u think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, Yeah right! Rick Dyer! Now go collect that $10 million from Cain!

      Delete
    2. That's all we need now, another asshole claiming to kill one! Better watch out for those MIB's!

      Delete
  21. Good lord some of you are long winded.

    That sound is not bigfoot. It's Gabriel's Trumpet. Scientists have called it electromagnetic waves striking our atmosphere in other videos.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Doesn't anybody see a pattern here. first rick Dyer found a dead big foot, then he SHOT one and was going to show the body later. Then along come Justin, and HE claims he shot TWo Big foots! but couldn't find the bodies. Then Rick Dyer gets jealous of Justin's claim, so not to be out done, says he will show off the BODY HANK in December, Then Justin claim is proven wrong and Rick Dyer admits he didn't have a body!
    Now we got some guy, writing all about that THEy killed a Big foot and it's in the freezer again. After THIS STORy is proven false, who else will come out of the wood work and claim they shot a big foot!
    What a fucking Joke! Why do people continue to believe this BS!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?