Fringe News: Real Bigfoot Howls, Man Shot Hunting Bigfoot, Bigfoot Files Pt3


Join Rev. Jeff s he takes a look at the last installment of the Bigfoot Files from Channel 4 in the UK, a man is shot during a Bigfoot Hunt in OK, An incredible Bigfoot Howl Video and much more. Watch the video for all the details.



Comments

  1. Sykes proved bigfoot don't exist. Smoked and pwned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you told Brian Sykes yet? I'm sure he doesn't know that. He might ask you to back the statement up as fact as he clearly wouldn't be able to make that assertion. ( Y'know, being scientific and logical and everything.. ).

      Delete
  2. You haven't set your clock back yet!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sykes proved that some of the samples he was given weren't bigfoot. Smoked, pwned, butthurt, crow eating and insane and cherry picking and tarded and something something...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Indiana Geological Survey, 1862

    Henry County, Indiana
    About seven or eight miles west of New Castle, a number of Indian skeletons were disinterred in the constructing a turnpike, and about the same distance south of town some remarkable humans bones and skeletons of giant size were dug out, with other relics, during the making of the road.

    Davenport Morning Tribune February 5, 1889
    Many Skeletons of an Extinct Indian Race Unearthed in Indiana
    Whitlock, Ind., Feb. 4.- A huge graves pit was opened here recently. Soon after the excavating began a skeleton was found, and as the pit widened other skeletons were until at last thirty graves had been opened and many skeletons brought to light, evidently the remains of an Indian tribe-the Shawnees, probably, who had the villages in this region. One skeleton was found beneath a large stump, and yesterday another was found twelve feet under ground. The graves appear in regular order, and the occupants were buried in a sitting posture. In one grave three skeletons, supposed to be those of a woman and two children, were found. Yesterday the largest specimen was unearthed, the body of a person who in life must have been a giant. A peculiarity of the skeletons is that of the teeth are nearly all in a perfect state of preservation. In one grave beside the human skeletons was that of a dog, a copper spear-head, and earthen pot, and numerous beads, proving that some important personage had been put to rest there. The city of the dead is undoubtedly 150 years old.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ohio Democrat November 24, 1892

      BURIAL PLACE OF GIANTS
      Skeletons of an Ancient Race Unearthed in Indiana
      Many Traditions Brought Out by the Discovery-Evidence of an Extinct Tribe of Very Large Americans
      A rich archaeological find was recently unearthed two miles west of Crawfordsville in a gravel pit along the high bluffs of Sugar creek. Thus far twenty-five skeletons of Brodingnagian stature have been exhumed, and the unburying of these mammoth bones is still going on. This necropolis of long ago is filled with exited hunters of curios and scientific students from Wabash college almost continually, and as soon as removed from the gravel their rattling bones carried away to become parts of departments of archaeology, which are being established all over the city.
      The last skeleton taken from the burial ground was a gigantic one,measuring seven feet in length. The femur alone would prove that the skeleton was that of a giant, and the pelvic bones twice as large as those of an ordinary man. The grinning skull of the giant had a perfect set of teeth, not one cracked or decayed, and with an enamel as beautiful as polished marble. The bones were perfect in every detail, notwithstanding the fact that they must have interred here for centuries. The entire absence of vegetable matter in the soil and the perfect drainage would account for the preservation of the bony structure.
      Of the whole number of skeletons thus far found only two indicate immature development, the remainder representing the fraework of a race of men evidebtly extinct for centuries. This is certainly the first discovery of skeletons in which the characteristic development of giants has been observed. It is thought by local scientist that these bones belong to a tribe of aborigines, but this theory cannot be fully established by the material structure of the skeleton.
      Although no implements or ornaments were found buried with the bones, yet in close proximity many instruments of warfare and domestic untensils were found. They are mostly composed of stone, though some are composed of copper and a few of shell and bone. The stone implements are flint spears and arrow heads, and appear to be wrought with exceeding great skill. Pottery is found in great abundance. For many years specimens of these pots have been unearthed in this region, especially along the banks of the creek.
      None of these skeletons was found in a separate grave, they being for the most part piled together in one conglomerate mass. Ten were found in one place in close contact, facing the setting sun, and arranged in a sitting posture. Many of the bones found farther down the bank, and in a soil in which there was more vegetable matter, crumbled to a dust as soon as exposed to the atmosphere, and the symmetry of a single bone could not be distinguished.
      Many traditions have been brought out since the discovery. One old settler has called to mind the fact that fifty years ago a tree was uprooted on this same spot, exposing three skeletons of gigantic dimensions, and as they were beneath the trees, it must have sprung up long after the bodies were buried.
      Gen. Lew Wallace says he remembers the sections of a stranger, who several years ago spent many months digging along the banks of Sugar creek in search of a gold spoon supposed to have been buried long ago when this part of the country was inhabited by savage tribes, and the owner of the land on which these remains were found calls to mind a tradition often related by his grandfather that a Spanish treasure had been buried here in the long, long ago, when the country was a wilderness and Chicago a barren waste of empenetrable swamps.
      The excavations are being continued, and it is thought that rich developments are in prospect, for there is not a foot of the soil removed that does not contain some relic or grinning skull.

      Delete
    2. For christ's sake give it a rest already! This isn't evidence of anything unless you've got the bodies to back it up

      Delete
    3. No DNA evidence, no real scientific evidence of any kind just lots of tall tales and conspiracy theories. Schooled ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    4. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    5. Recycling the old news that Zana is a human, doesn't debunk dermals, doesn't debunk unknown hominid DNA, doesn't debunk a transcribed complex language, doesn't debunk 100 years of printed news media of biological evidnece being found, doesn't debunk the tens of thousands of eye witnesses AND... I will be here to taunt you with the truth forever... Cause you can't handle it.

      Boooooooooommmmmmmm!!!!!!!

      Delete
    6. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha you arrogant obnoxious prick! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha no proof but pointless cut and pastes! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha I believe in fairytales! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Delete
    7. Sykes proved that bigfoot don't exist. Dance around it however you like that's what he did.

      Delete
    8. Those cut and pastes are extremely relevant, because the one thing that you require to back all other evidence there is to prove the existence of this creature, is being hidden from you.

      Sykes proved that the samples presented to him, that we're thought to be Bigfoot, were not. Only someone with a small mind would jump to so much closure out of desperation.

      That is why I get called names and that is why I love the fact you people wince whilst dribbling all over the keyboard every time the truth is blasted at you from good old South Wales.

      Absolutely schooled... Cue the names, cause that's all you have you silly little insignificants.

      Delete
    9. No unknown DNA, no transcribed language, lots of tall tails to sell papers with no other physical evidence to back them up lots of misidentifications, hoaxes and bullshitters!
      Boooooom muthafucker!!!!!!!!!!!!
      You've got nothing and we like it you arrogant prick!!!!!!
      Tick tock tick tock Sykes kicked your butt! Cut and paste away Joe we all know that's all you ever do! Nothing will change a sceptic's mind quicker than a cut and paste of a hundred year old article on giant skeletons published in some obscure newspaper or journal. You've got us bang to rights there Joe that's it I'm a believer lets go wood knocking I'll bring the gifting basket if you bring the jam sandwiches. You have finally schooled us all yay for Joe king of the footers!!!! Yay!! Let's go burn down the Smithsonian! PRICK

      Delete
    10. Do you fail to understand that you have no proof that bigfoot exists? That's kind of the reason sykes was involved. Do you think he would have got involved if it was already proven? No. So as it stands there is no proof and therefore no reason to believe in bigfoot any more than leprechauns or unicorns.

      Delete
    11. It's not proof Joe it's heresay in old papers and no one is hiding anything there is no conspiracy the truth from beautiful Yorkshire you putz :)

      Delete
    12. Where are the bodies Joe? Cue conspiracy about science suppressing truth and the evil bastards at the Smithsonian! It's a global conspiracy they got to Sykes too!!!! It's all real damnit!!!!!

      Delete
    13. Giant skeletons found everywhere, Smithsonian conspiracy, gibberish found to be language of unproven creature, infra sound hunting, unknown primate DNA, thousands of misidentifications and attention hungry people, hundreds of hoaxed YouTube videos, lots of damn bears, angelic DNA, psychic Squatch rape, gifting baskets and owl calls, jumping Russian guy, MK Davis photo manipulations, Bigfoot stole my deer, Viking vs Bigfoot, stonemason by day anthropologist on the weekend, Bigfoot can see infrared, eyshine, aquatic ape theory, Nephilm, blah, blah, blah
      FOOLED!!!!!

      Delete
    14. Evidence -

      *tracks with dermals that have consistency across mutiple track samples from opposite sides of the country that also show toe bending and scarring. Does already proven Zana human DNA debunk this? No.

      *A transcribed, layered, complex language that is both above and below human frequency that is also twice the speed of human range that is recorded 50 miles into the wilderness of Northern California. Does Already proven Zana human DNA debunk this? No.

      *Unknown primate DNA that is afee degradation and contamination from many years worth of exposure that later yields different results. Does already proven Zana human DNA debunk this? No.

      *ten thousand years of Native American culture. Does already proven Zana human DNA debunk this? No.

      *100 years of settlers diaries, archeological studies, scientific studies, printed news media that documents large skeletons being found and then taken away to institutions such as the Smithsonian. Does already proven Zana human DNA debunk this? No.

      *Does already proven Zana human DNA debunk Bigfoot in the minds of stupid people? It is indeed apparent.

      You can't handle the truth and you certainly cannot handle official State documants that document giant skeletons being found. Why? Because for years you have been able to claim that there is no biological evidnece and now that I can show you that... You are absolutely schooled.

      Schooled. Debunk those official documents or shut up and go away.

      Delete
    15. The Scientific American, in 1883, published the following account:

      Two miles from Mandan, on the bluffs near the junction of the Hart and Missouri Rivers, says the local newspaper,
      the Pioneer, is an old Cemetery of fully 100 acres in extent filled with bones of a giant race. This vast city of the dead
      lies just east of the Fort Lincoln road. The ground has the appearance of having been filled with trenches piled full of
      dead bodies, both man and beast, and covered with several feet of earth. In many places mounds from 8 to 10 feet
      high, and some of them 100 feet or more in length, have been thrown up and are filled with bones, broken pottery,
      vases of various bright colored flint, and agates ... showing the work of a people skilled in the arts and possessed of
      a high state of civilization. This has evidently been a grand battlefield, where thousands of men ... have fallen. ...Five
      miles above Mandan, on the opposite side of the Missouri, is another vast cemetery, as yet unexplored. We asked
      an aged Indian what his people knew of these ancient grave yards. He answered: "Me know nothing about them.
      They were here before the red man."

      From the Ironton Register, a small Ohio River town newspaper, dated 5 May 1892,:

      Where Proctorville now stands was one day part of a well paved city, but I think the greatest part of it is now in the
      Ohio river. Only a few mounds, there; one of which was near the C. Wilgus mansion and contained a skeleton of a
      very large person, all double teeth, and sound, in a jaw bone that would go over the jaw with the flesh on, of a large
      man; The common burying ground was well filled with skeletons at a depth of about 6 feet. Part of the pavement was
      of boulder stone and part of well preserved brick.

      Delete
    16. Cue the old... "All your evidence has been debunked crap!" When it hasn't; not by you or anyone, and cue the million names that comes my way because you people are totally schooled.

      Utterly and totally and comprehensively.

      This is the reason why you people have not seen biological evidence and this is the reason that now you are presented with it by a little Welshman, that you should be so offended.

      ; )

      Suck on that; the laugh is on you trying to explain official documents and printed news media away.

      Delete
    17. You cannot deny history, you cannot deny archeological, scientific, anthropological official study documents and printed news media.

      You cannot and will not censor this stuff anymore. History is your rapture.

      Schooled by Joe Fitzgerald.

      Oh... And one thing I stated yesterday but I'll say it again; not once so far in all the comments I've pasted have I recycled anything; this is how much stuff is out there to access.

      Sorry to ruin your day but the truth, though it hurts, is very necessary.

      Delete
    18. Hey Danny boy! Did you go down on your girlfriend yet? i left you a present!

      Delete
    19. Daniel. That is not nice. Joe and I are releasing Mike Brookreson's reading of recently discovered Lost Settlers Journals very soon. Do not disrupt my press junket.

      Delete
    20. Don't listen to dan, I'm enjoying the tales of giant skeletons. It is a refreshing break from your usual cut and paste.

      Delete
    21. AK 47 w/scope be a good huntin rifle – for critters, U be right follow up shots required – 30 round mag w/154SP rounds will take care of it no problem. Looks like bigfoot travels in groups so da one U are shootin @ be aware there beez others about. Been a few cases it these parts of hunters finding this out the hard way. So if U goes out for da big guy U might want to take a few buds with and do like we did in the army and set up a fireteam to cover the guy that is shootin. If U do go, check with the locals some will talk about these type of critters, U be able to narrow down your area to cover. Happy huntin : )

      Delete
  5. Why is joe still here? Pretty sure he got smoked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll be 'smoked' when you debunk, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Bigfoot doesn't exist. Recycling the old news that Zana is a human, doesn't cut it...


      Wow you people are twp (Welsh for stupid)

      Schooled.

      Delete
    2. You can't prove bigfoot dont exist ya jackass.

      You have to provide proof it exists. The same standard of biological proof as every other animal on this planet. The fact that you and thousands of others including the world's best geneticist cant speaks volumes.

      Schooled.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. These certainly seem to be pretty juvenile as debunkers on here. Trying to latch on to anything they can as unequivocal 'proof' of the non-existence of the bigfoot. Everything seems to work in their favour to their absolute 'denial by science' argument. Everyday they celebrate something which has little meaning or merit. I don't get it. An irascible small minded bunch.

      Delete
    4. Smoked footer that believes the world is 10,000 years old^

      Delete
    5. What you can do, is prove that the evidence there is for this creature existing isn't what it is... But you can't. AND, when you have documentation upon documentation of biological evidence being found; it means you are left scared as well as very stupid.

      "I can't debunk a 100 years of printed news media... Welcome to Jackass!"

      Schooled.

      ; )

      Delete
    6. You have nothing worth debunking, you can't even provide actual proof to back up you're claims already. I've yet to see a giant human skeleton or an actual accredited place that has one. I've yet to see Figboot DNA, I've yet to see a single claim you have made come to fruition.

      Now why is that? Either because Figboot isn't real or you just are a looney whack job.

      Delete
    7. No, no, no, no Crampz... You are schooled. You cannot deny official State archeological, anthropological, scientific documentation of giant skeletons being found.

      What's that you say?

      "Less words more science"

      Well in those words I paste to you, you have that in droves... Too much for you to handle it seems.

      STEP 4 syndrome won't make that go away, narcissism won't make that go away, ignorance and hate won't make that go away, and the amount you poo on the quality of this blog and make more and more people wish you weren't here, that won't make that go away either.

      Now run along Campbell, cause Joe Fitzgerald has done it again.

      Cue the STEP 4 syndrome and loads of names. I'll apologise in hand on Crampz' behalf to all the parents that encourage their children to look at this blog... If it was down to me Crampz would have not been allowed back on the blog.

      Peace.

      Delete
    8. Wow.

      You're really serious aren't you?

      Biggest case of delusion I've ever seen.

      Delete
    9. Just come out with it Crampz; you're just pissed Bigfoot hasn't been proven yet.

      Why else would you invest SOOOOO much time here.

      You and me both know it. The difference is, you've run out of patience cause you've been following this subject longer.

      Peace.

      Delete
    10. I come here to point and laugh. It's like watching a car crash. I gave up on bigfoot not long after nessy, Easter bunny, Santa clause, and the yeti. It's more fun to watch you self pwn.

      Every claim you have ever made has been wrong. But you find the deepest area of denial and try to spin it like you never said the claims.

      It's a case study in psychology.

      Delete
    11. Bigfoot hasn't given up on you Daniel. Spoke with him this weekend about it. :)

      Delete
    12. Crampz... You point and claim that everything I have said has been wrong, but the reality of the situation is that it hasn't.

      You can type that a million times; heck it seems to be the only thing you really bring to the table these days... But it doesn't make it true and there are Bigfoot running around all the same.

      Watching me reel off documented account upon documented account and seeing you people squirm is a case study in psychology.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    13. Heinous Joe, you need to chill, brah, take some sacred herb from de jar and fire it up mon. Irie, den you be seein' anyting you want to see. Don' trust dem bigfoot fellas, they be tricksters messin' wit yo mind.

      I keep me spliffs ine jar.

      Delete
    14. If this is the guy who posted Jah Fitz... Then you've made me laugh again.

      Peace.

      Delete
  6. Pwned like joe fitz at 8.57pm last night as the credits rolled.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The time limit for providing evidence for bigfoot is up because....ummm...well I'm not sure. Who owns the stopwatch again?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another step closer to proving the existence of bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank MABRC or NAWAC for those three idiots. Either group of gun happy rednecks aiming to shoot themselves a booger could have provided these team members. It has happened now twice, the Echo Incident comes to mind. Never mind it’s not a f-ing ape, shoot it. Get famous, because nothing else will pull you out of your hole.. Only Meldrum’s PhD and repeated preaching could pull off this fantasy among such ignorant people. The clock is ticking. It’s the 21st century and even fifth graders know bi-pedal, hands, and human face, all add up to human, not ape. Shawn you need to teach some basic biology and taxonomy here, address it to the Wood Ape bros.

      Delete
    2. This is impaired driver here. We have a Shiner in the Bock.

      Delete
    3. AK 47 w/scope be a good huntin rifle – for critters, U be right follow up shots required – 30 round mag w/154SP rounds will take care of it no problem. Looks like bigfoot travels in groups so da one U are shootin @ be aware there beez others about. Been a few cases it these parts of hunters finding this out the hard way. So if U goes out for da big guy U might want to take a few buds with and do like we did in the army and set up a fireteam to cover the guy that is shootin. If U do go, check with the locals some will talk about these type of critters, U be able to narrow down your area to cover. Happy huntin : )

      Delete
  9. "Sykes is coming! Sykes is coming!"...well he came- right on your face Joe- and then drew pictures in it and stuff...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yes, Sykes came... But he is still studying last time I checked and has two samples that are expected to change the world.

      Bear DNA and ready sequenced years ago Zana DNA doesn't debunk Bigfoot. That's unless you're too thick to grasp that fact.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    2. There are still thick arcing ropes of Sykes jism landing on PJ's pursed lips!

      Delete
    3. Sykes didn't go on to debunk Bigfoot like you said he would Crampz... Schooled.

      Old news about Zana and a couple of bears don't debunk Bigfoot and it is laughable that you should jump all over such details when in the face of everything there is in accumulation to acknowledge this creature, is 'not enough'.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    4. Joe is a jrefer that is pretending to be a believer to highlight how incredibly stupid they are. May I say you are doing a superb job of it.

      Delete
    5. No Figboot, no actual giant skeletons (your sources have no idea of what you say), and you're a looney.

      I'd say yer pwned

      Delete
    6. Hey Danny boy! Did you kiss your girlfriend yet? if you did you tasted my black load!

      Delete
    7. Coming to terms with the truth isn't always easy Crampz, but I never said it would be...

      If you simply turn back and we can fight this censorship together.., we can fight it!!

      Peace.

      Delete
  10. I want to visit the "Chocolate Factory" of a Hot giant woman. Oompa loompa, Oompa loompa.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Congratulations to dan campz and commiserations to joe fitz.

    Its back to patty and giant skeleton cover up conspiracies for joe.

    What's the next thing for the footers to latch all their hopes on?

    Weve had ketchum, daisy, dyer and now sykes all coming up with nothing. What's the next big thing for the footers or is that it now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well we still have the taterhole to discuss.

      Delete
    2. Newark Advocate November 27, 1911

      IMMENSE GRAVE CONTAINING SKELETONS
      Of Prehistoric Race of Giants Unearthed Near Pine Grove Kentucky
      Measured 12 Feet.
      Pine Grove, Ky. Nov. 27.-Evidences of a prehistoric race have been uncovered by Hugh Yates, a prosperous land owner of this country, on his farm, a few miles west of here. While excavating beneath a high cliff on his place, Mr. Yates came upon an immense grave containing a human skeleton. The frame was of giant proportions.
      His curiosity aroused, Mr. Yates called in some neighbors, and, armed with picks, they burrowed their way into the side of the cliff and found an ancient sepulcher crowded with human skeletons, some of them larger than the first one. One of the frames measured 12 feet.
      Along with the skeletons were found curiously wrought jewels and strange ornaments, while cooking vessels and musical instruments of queer design were unearthed in great profusion. The diggers are still at work and expect to make even more important finds.

      Delete
    3. Joe Fitz I seen that episode your speaking of it was amazing the host of that show has his shit together love watching it wish more people would pay attention to his findings

      Delete
  12. Another bunch of bigfoot bullshit. It doesn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
  13. http://vidbull.com/2i8p70nd92po.html "bigfoot files 03"

    ReplyDelete
  14. and here another monkey foot..age
    http://www.novamov.com/video/cen5oorpc4vpk

    ReplyDelete
  15. Joe it's the Canadian guy I was really hopping this dr Sykes was going to come up with something so next year if we have the chance were going to shoot, but if we hit one of these bfs with a kill shot and it walks away like nothing happened than the shows over! No more and it would be last time we go after them, how could dr Sykes not have got a good sample from anyone in these huge community of believers joe fitz what's going on with this study now is that it ??? Was it a good episode?? What do u think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it walks away go 40 cal or 20 mm

      Delete
    2. I have found some things MJA. Contact me via email. M

      Delete
    3. Hey TTL!

      It appears Melba has all the good samples. Sykes' study is continuing however, and he has a reported 'two samples that have nothing to do with bear, humans or apes, that is likely to change the world'... We can only hope these are the two samples Ro Sahebi has suggested are Bigfoot samples.

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. "Melba has all the good samples"

      How deluded can you be?

      Sykes tested the same sample which was a bear but she says bigfoot. Hence her entire study is complete nonsense. Many other scientists have said the same thing. But the proof is right there with the sample sykes tested.

      It is an absolute smoking for footers.

      Delete
    5. Wrong...

      Melba had all the best samples and what was left over were from Bears.

      Smeja's boots' DNA degraded between sequences.

      I think you will find that Melba's work is gaining a little more attention than you either realise or choose to acknowledge.

      Schooled.

      Delete
  16. I got a Idaho Professor who is telling people a bi-pedal human looking Myth is really a giant extinct ape, and the footers believe him. He is allowed to teach this at the University too? That Gigantopiticus was bi-pedal and survived till today. No other ape then or now is bi-pedal. Amazing work of fiction. Not so amazing Texans believe him. But, the rest of the footers? The BFRO? Did none of these rednecks go to college? Sleep through highschool biology? It is no wonder society and science laugh out loud. A 7 foot tall ape, hiding all these years, smart but "not that smart," says Meldrum. His selective learning is the enigma..

    ReplyDelete
  17. So are you saying they're human. Correct. Or that Meldrum may have an agenda??? I'm interested now for once. M

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The history and details are excessive to list here. But, in short, yes to both. You may have to look harder, to cached files to get the entire answer online as he has been more careful these past three years. Or find the right footer to PM you. Or talk to him privately, or pay to hear him talk to what he thinks is a friendly ignorant crowd. Kind of reminds me of the McCain..."bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran" spoken to a friendly crowd. Lost him the election. Eyes and ears are everywhere now.

      Delete
    2. Mike, loan his book through a library, the academic mistakes are there forever. His agenda we see real time.

      Delete
    3. Ask any researcher or witness that thinks bigfoots are close to human what positive time or attention they get form Meldrum. The answer will be zero. Ask a teenager with a blog that mimics whatever the TV stars say and he will tell you how helpful Meldrum's feedback was on his Wood Ape article. I am offended he would use a kid in such a manner, a recent attempt to rename bigfoots by a claimed Texas C Footers and witnesses are especially suseptible to any attention because they are so often ridiconservancy group, which Meldrum adivses! No connected scientist will validate witnesses, no government agency, not even family often. They turn to each other and find more brusings from the researchers with not so transparent goals. The one PhD out there, the guy to make them feel sane, the top of the Bigfootery dung heap seems like the ticket to respectability. But, the lessons a teacher of arcehology should teach are ignored and instead a monster myth is marketed. If you don't know too much you are relieved, even proud to be recognized. If you know r something a little more in keeping with conventional archeology or biology, or bigfoots, you are shunned.

      Delete
    4. edit: ^Texas "Conservancy" group, which Meldrum adivses! Footers and witnesses are especially suseptible to any attention because they are so often ridiculed.

      Delete
    5. Just in case: the Texas 'concervancy" group is pro-kill and responsible for the recent campaign to rename bigfoots, "for their own good," to Wood Apes. I think to anyone but a Texan, of Meldrum, it is an obvious attempt to push to arm's length any morality for a footer killing one. They have to be "apes" to kill even for backwoods boys. Or professors.

      Delete
    6. Look. I appreciate all that. I do. But I spent the weekend with MK in the woods. I was looking for perspective. I think I found it. Thank you all. M

      Delete
    7. Well then you got some insane woo picture of foots. Gawwwd are all footers insane?

      Delete
    8. It's the Ketchum Mental Kamp or Meldrum Monkeys for you, only?
      Group mentality among these footers ... no name for it..cult maybe.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. The only cult is you people and the way your persistence in frequenting a subject so religiously with out knowing the first thing about it.

      Run along hater... You can't handle the truth and that scares you.

      Delete
    11. joe you haven't a clue who you are talking to..again what's with there the only one or two ways to view this issue..a cult follower or a hater? but you are neither right? maybe there is hope

      Delete
    12. Mike, glad your back..Meldrum's only "agenda" is that he is a real professor, who thinks the evidence warrants further investigation by other academics..He will not get them interested by claiming bigfoot is in the homo line..A homo species without tools is practically an oxymoron..If it exists, we will find they split from us millions of years ago, before our line developed bidpedalism even..We will find it developed that trait, and high intelligence, in parallel...
      I find it amusing that we complain scientist blow off this subject, and then contradict the few that don't...

      Delete
  18. Don't panic folks.

    Sykes may have found nothing but fear not a real scientist named bill munns says patty is the real deal.

    Oh and also sweati yeti posted a smiley face one or two times. Who can argue with that kind of stuff?

    ReplyDelete
  19. And because they don't exsist it really doesn't matter if I shoot one because I'm not shooting anything right it's just a 7 foot bear running around on two legs like that Russian video

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "... it's just a 7 foot bear running around on two legs like that Russian video."

      Priceless.

      Delete
    2. Nah, dats Heinous Joe. Boy needs to get laid and smoke some of the holy herb.

      Delete
  20. has sykes not shut down this site yet. surely u dicks realise there aint no 9ft magic monkey running about. smeja=smoked. every single sample=smoked
    end of

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because Sykes hasn't debunked Bigfoot... Only that the samples he had were not Bigfoot.

      A laughably dim person would have clocked on to that.

      Oh... And no magic monkeys, just giant hairy people.

      Delete
    2. Yes footery can (unfortunately) keep rolling on forever despite there being no such creature. Its why it still goes on after 50 years of nothing and will still be going on after another 50 years of nothing.

      Delete
    3. Hey joe fits it's the Canada guy is there anything new coming up in the Bigfoot world?? Any rumors that sound legit?? U seem to be on top of things! ???????

      Delete
    4. Hey Joe, Canada douche guy I'm trolling you and you don't even know it

      Delete
    5. 8:01...

      'Unfortunately'? Why are you here?? If this subject bothers you so much, simply remove yourself from it. Bigfoot is a surviving subject because Bigfoot has physical evidence. You can't handle that and you either are scared of your own backyard (that's why you feel it unfortunate) or are preoccupied with hate campaign because you are encouraged to... Either way you are slime and I will always be here to ruin your days as long as you frequent this blog. People like you have it coming in the shape of bad karma.

      Hey TTL!!

      I think Shawn Evidence has all the latest news, but if I hear anything you'll be the first to know. How are you???

      Peace.

      Delete
    6. Joe Fitz just so u now that post above was not from me Canadian guy , have a good day joe ttl

      Delete
    7. Joe Fitz just so you know that was me Canada guy up above and I am trolling you and TTL stands for Talk Till Later That's not my initials have a shitty day

      Delete
  21. Unlike the Reverend and the usual idiots here I have seen the last epiosde of the BF files. Sykes DID NOT say after examining all the evidence that Zana was just a modern African (slave). He supposed that Zana was an ARCHAIC African sapiens, means: still more Homo erectus than modern Homo sapiens sapiens. After examining just 35 samples in 3 episodes he found out that there is a big and until now unknown Pleistocene bear in the Himalayas and that there were an archaic humans in the Caucasus until modern times (and perhaps they are still there?). What a defeat for the "believers"! Honestly, this blog gets more ridiculous from day to day. Thanks god, your hit rates are now even lower than for Rick Dyer`s blog!!!



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dick Ryder sux all in his vicinity.

      Delete
    2. I think the study so far has helped to show that cryptozoology can be a legitimate interdisciplinary subject... As far as demonstrating there are undiscovered bipedal primates that correspond to what one would label a 'bigfoot' or 'yeti', well, no dice....

      Delete
    3. rick dyer is trying to feed his kids, lay off.

      Delete
  22. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking: Derek Randles Releases Most Amazing Thermal Footage of Bigfoot Ever