Download This Free E-Book: Communion With Sasquatch By J.P. Smith and Freeman Young
"Communion with Sasquatch" is a non-fiction narrative written by author and journalist J.P. Smith, and co-authored by researcher, Freeman Young.
The book is based on a series of interviews conducted by Smith, with three men who have had exceptional, lifelong experiences and up-close, personal encounters with the being known as Sasquatch.
You will read in amazement, marvel, and wonder at perhaps the most intriguing and elusive being on the face of the planet, as each of the three interviewees recounts their most incredible, bizarre and sometimes frightening experiences with the legendary Bigfoot creatures, as they’re known throughout North America.
Beginning in the 1960’s and leading up to as recently as November of 2011, "Communion with Sasquatch" goes beyond the myth and straight into the very real world of Sasquatch, leaving you excited, in awe and eager for your own, personal experiences with our giant friends!
Download it here via MuldersWorld.com: Communion With Sasquatch
Wakey Wakey time to commune with the Big Guy! I'll be first!
ReplyDeleteJP SMITH AND FEEEMAN YOUNG HAVE THE SKILLS TO PAY THE BILLS!!!!!!!!
DeleteI recommend everyone read this!!!
Peace.
Too much reading.
Delete(Sigh)
DeleteHow long am I banned for Shawn?
DeleteQuiet, it's my nappy time.
DeleteIn position
ReplyDeleteOne in the chamber
here we go
MMC
Still no evidence of bigfoot?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTddczieNdQ
Delete... Glad I could help.
Peace.
Still none then
DeleteWatch it and weep.
DeleteNot seeing any bigfoot...
DeleteIf you had actual evidence you could convince everyone and you wouldn't even have to try hard. It would be self apparent.
The fact that you can't do this speaks volumes.
"Not seeing any bigfoot... Not seeing any bigfoot... Not seeing any bigfoot... Not seeing any bigfoot... PLEEEEEAAAAASE don't be a Bigfoot???!!!!"
DeleteKeep telling yourself that numpty, hope you're not paying too much for those therapy sessions?
If you actually had a tiny bit less denialism and some sort of explanation for the footage, then your comments would be taken seriously.
The fact that you cannot even accept the subject in the video, let alone explain how it achieves the speed, motion and physical proportions, speaks volumes.
Smoked^
Delete"Denialism"
You what?
There is nothing being denied. Its not like youve dumped a bigfoot body on the floor in front of me and I am saying "nope not a bigfoot". You are infact offering nothing as per.
Oh im sorry if you can state the speed of the subject and the measurements of the proportions then there may be something to think about but you can not even do that. You want it to be a magic ape so in your eyes it is a magic ape. That doesn't mean that's what it really is though.
You've been put to bed too many times joe. Give it up bro leave yourself with some dignity.
Denialism... Yes...
DeleteWhat I have provided you, is a piece of footage that has a creature in it that switches from bipedal motion to quadrupedal motion, has impossible muscle tone and limb girth and speed that cannot be accomplished by one of us in that terrain...
I can back up this footage with a matching specimen in Patty; again footage that you cannot explain (not to mention the other pieces of footage that are debatable), I can then back up this footage further with dermals, language, 100 years of anthropological and archaeological studies of biological evidence, unknown primate DNA, relic human DNA (from the same region), ten thousand years of Native acknowledgement and tens of thousands of eyewitnesses, much of which are multiple person.
This footage, backed up with the accumulation of evidence I have just referenced, with a complete lack of any source to debunk it, is as good as bringing a body to your door. Laughably... You cannot provide me with an explanation for the list of things the creature achieves, so the speed and measurements are slightly irrelevant in your case right now. The truth is, you require there not to be a Bigfoot so bad that you not only deny those things without offering any means as to accomplishing getting anyone around here to believe your claim, but you then come here and express it as a means of bypassing that level of reassurance you require of the things out there that you have no control over... Pretty sad.
You have had all your little claims kicked right back down the basement steps at you too many times to count... I would focus your efforts on attaining self esteem in the real world out there... You need not worry about Bigfoot to accomplish that, just stay out of the woods.
: )
Lol^
DeleteSmoked footer.
The plural of nothing is still nothing ya jackass.
The only nothing is between your ears.
DeleteWho's the jackass?
He's right PJ.
DeletePlural of nothin is still nothin.
No amount of circumstantial evidence and hearsay will prove anything.
"Duh... No evidence! Fart, swear, burp... Hick up! No evidence! Fart burp, hick up! Nose pick, fart... Duh... No evidence!"
DeleteYou might want to get that looked at ^
DeleteSounds like you're coming down with a case of the PJ's.
I thought it an exact likeness.
DeletePeace.
How can you claim patty is a matching specimen to leaping yeti? They look nothing alike.
DeleteBigfoot is real.
Let's bring Joe some backup; he's being surrounded by dimwitted twerktards. No one else with a spine is around to dish some out to these festering trolls? Maybe the trolls appear too ridiculous to bother.
Delete10:20...
DeletePlease, look at the MK Davis version in the link I have provided and look at the detail in the screen shots of the leap.
That is a matching specimen.
From the BEB Observation Post...
Thank you bro.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteFreeman: Yeah. And the numbers are way bigger than Matt Moneymaker says. The numbers are way bigger than anybody is saying right now. I‘m going to say the numbers are in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of hominoids, just in North
ReplyDeleteAmerica. There‘s some math -we could do that we could figure that out actually.
JP: Let‘s touch on that just a little bit. What makes you think there‘s that many?
Freeman: Because I keep finding groups. I don‘t just find one here and one there. I find families. I find pods. And I find the pods in the most unlikely places, right under everyone‘s nose. And they rotate. Those pods rotate out and another pod rotates in. They change their space around where they go. I‘ve been noticing this for the last six years. I‘ve been canvassing these areas for the last six years. And I know that right here in my own backyard, there‘s at least 50 Bigfoot right around here–50 to 100 Bigfoot right in this little open space right here. That‘s a lot. So if I multiply that times all the open spaces that I know of in the state, that‘s where I get my half million from.
YEAH RIGHT
I keep my poop in a pod.
DeleteBLASPHEMY!
DeleteLOL.
DeleteBigfootery is insane.
No doubt joe will believe this.
I don't necessarily agree with the numbers being quoted, but there are few enthusiasts that do agree... Simply because we don't know. That is the beautie of developing research though and to take on board the opinions of others which I am open to.
DeleteWhat is 'insane', is you would prioritise coming to a Bigfoot blog and express ignorance when you could be getting on with developing a healthy social circle.
Peace.
..Ugh...Is that really a quote? Sounds like the book is priced right.....
DeleteI keep me spliffs in a jar, and me self-aware disembodied taterhole in de bathtub. me feeds it swamp eels and donuts (de Fatsano diet)
DeleteSkepfoolery is insane.
DeleteFreeman's point is that they are in far greater numbers than most expect. The typical assumption from the average witness is that they must be extremely rare or even endangered to have such a relatively low number of sightings. However, this is a common misconception. The number of reports per year is in the thousands and that's not counting the number of witnesses who are genuinely afraid of the humiliation and ridicule they could potentially face by coming forward with what they experienced. Being is that they are elusive "people" AKA unknown hominids who intentionally and intelligently hide from humans, their only threat aside from the elements, just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there.
DeleteMy guesstimate is that they are in the six-digits in the U.S. and possibly seven-digits including all of North America. Jump on Google Earth (an excellent way to locate them provided you know what to look for) and just look at the vast amount of wilderness that few to no humans inhabit and I think it will be fairly obvious that the possibility for such a being to exist there is highly likely. Now combine that with the FACT that they live among us in residential areas that are enveloped in the forests and the possibility becomes even more likely.
Then there's the fact that they live on every single continent on the planet, from the Americas to Africa, Asia, and even isolated continents such as, Australia and islands like New Zealand. Worldwide they must be in the millions.
Is it really so difficult to grasp the idea of an an ancient race surviving the ages and learning to hide and adapt from what is now their only natural threat? The octopus has done it and while they are intelligent, the Sasquatch is even that much more intelligent. Even scientifically, it's not hard to come to these conclusions. The main problem science has with the idea of living, relic hominids is it blows their current theory of evolution out of the water and that's not good for business.
~JP
Has you're self aware disembodied taterhole fish taken communion from you're worm today?
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is complete bullshit. There is no way that any creature of that size and abundance could survive undetected.
ReplyDelete70% of the USA is covered in wilderness. It has deer, elk, fish and plenty of vegetation to survive on. It is nocturnal and evades us in social groups with all the intelligence we are capable of but with the knowledge and negotiation skills of it's environment of a green beret. It buries its dead too.
DeleteGlad I could help.
Yea and this does not make a difference. All it does is makes you sound like the mad hobo on the corner.
DeleteThe only 'mad hobo' is the one that is a little too scared to look at just the frequency of sightings alone, and think there is nothing to them.
DeleteSchooled. If you don't agree with the subject matter, run along.
Your 70% of the USA is covered in wilderness so there is plenty of room for bigfoot to hide claim is ridiculous. The deserts in the south west are considered wilderness. So are the great plains.
DeleteSchooled.
DeleteThe deserts also have wooded areas that offer significant cover to hide in, as do these places also have miles worth of underground caverns that are yet to be totally explored. This, in considering these creatures are largely nocturnal, means evasion is maintained.
DeleteNow that is a schooling.
Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. I do not know, but I suspect well over 100,000 thousand. The Sasquatch really has it pretty good right now. Forest that were cut down in the 19 and 20 century have now reclaimed the land, as Joe says 70%, throw in Canada and it is endless. Farms out on the edge of forest producing a bounty of vegetables, berries and fruits, and if corn is in their diet one would never starve. Goats, sheep, pigs, chickens to pick off and small game and deer are in record numbers. Rivers, creeks, lakes full of fish and other edibles. And a public that does not shoot at them very much, unlike in the days prior to the 1960's.
DeleteWhat a post sir!
DeleteMy bigfoot population estimation:
Delete0
^Brain capacity estimation:
Delete0
Smoked footer^ believes magic apes are frolicking around americs seen by thousands but yet remaining completely unverified by science.
DeleteSmoked.
The same 'science' that still hasn't managed to debunk the notion that 'magic apes are frolicking around americs seen by thousands'...
DeleteSelf schooled.
Are we really back to "science cant debunk it"? Really? Wow. Desperate times for you.
DeleteAbout as desperate as someone denying the truth.
DeleteI read a couple of pages and came across this. Sasquatch are much closer geographically than people imagine, often dwelling or frequenting wooded areas of suburban neighborhoods, industrial areas, restuarants, shopping centers, and farms. I believe this and had such and experience that may support this premise.
DeleteThe first week of March 2010 I was coming home from the business I owned in Piqua, Oh around midnight. I passed through the town of Laura, OH and about 300 yards outside of town of state route 721 I saw a tree down that had fallen next to the road. That tree was upright 12 hours earlier when I passed through in the AM. Everyone else would have ignored it, but not Chuck. Being to dark I came back in the daylight the next day with my son 7 at the time. The tree was a poplar and springy 8 inches diameter at the base and six inches in the middle. It was healthy and had a small canopy as it grew next to many trees on a small 10 foot high ridge. The tree was 20 foot tall as I took a measuring tape. We walked up to its base and it had been uprooted. Behind the ridge was a small creek that feeds the famous Ludlow falls. The ground was still hard from the record Feb. snowfalls of 2010 and no tracks were found at the top. Then we examined the tree. At 14 feet up the bark was all scuffed up. The top lay in a small ditch and next to where the canopy lay was huge footprint right at the bottom of the ditch where snowmelt had softened the ground a little. The footprint measures 17 inches by 11 inches although no distinct toes were seen but a seperation of the toe area was seen. and the print was imbedded two inches. I am 6 foot 200 lbs and jumping next to it I could only make an impression of 1/2 inch. I casted it and took pictures. The thing that puzzled me was this is farmland like all of Miami and Darke couny is, however all farms have pockets of 10 acres or more of woods and in the area behind the tree is at least 20 acres. The deer population here is small and in the 14 years I had lived in the area only a couple of times have I seen a deer. However for the next two days in the fields next to the woods I spotted a herd of deer of at least 10 members. After two days they were not seen again. The other thing puzzling was the 11 inch width, quite a bit above the bigfoot mean of around 7 inches.
Now forward to Dec. 2012 and reading newly posted BFRO reports. One was for Miami County, OH number 33979 which is about 30 miles east of me and 25 miles east of Laura and of course immediately drew my attention. It is a tremendous report in an area one would not suspect, with pictures and well written. The witness had activity around his homestead from Feb. 2009 until August 2009. He heard it at night walking and making noise, found tracks, fence torn down, deer torn up with legs stacked against trees, and two visible sightings of a huge bigfoot. There is a tract of woods that his house butts up against of about 100 acres and can be seen on google earth just west of the town of Christiansburg, OH. When I saw the measurement of the track my heart almost stopped. 17 inches x 11 inches spot on to the one I found a few months later. Had that same bigoot that had made a home for six months around Christiansburg moved across the county and torn down the tree and left the print I had found? With the rivers and small wooded tracts of farmland in our agricultural area this is very possible.
Alpha Dog Chuck
Wow.
DeleteMuch respect Chuck.
Bear double stepped print as proven by evans. Smoked.
Deleteaint no bears in this part of ohio, agricultural. A double stepped bear track looks nothing like a bigfoot track and the experiment by Evans did not even come close to the photographed 1951 tracks. It was a complete waste of his and Icon films time and every researcher knows it. Evans is pretty much as clueless about the Sasquatch as you are.
DeleteFeel free to smoke another bowl.
Chuck
'Bear double stepped print' does not explain dermals that are consistent with a species trait taken from opposite sides of the country decades apart, and does not explain toe bending and scarring.
DeleteEvans smokes the ignorant to the facts, only.
Also no claw marks like a bear would leave.
DeleteChuck
We wish Sharon Shill would go back to her own blogs.
DeleteHey you can buy a mug at her blog with her angry doubting eyes printed on it.
Do you want her angry glaring eyes to be one of the first things you see each morning? Are you willing to give her money for the privilege of owning such a mug with eyes which glare angrily at you every day?
Making cash off of doubting bigfoot and paid to be in a steady state of doubting denial about a myriad of topics, and selling mugs to support this "effort."
Oh yeah, get your mug today! Grab 'em while you can!
Does smug come with the mug or is that sold separately, batteries not included?
DeleteThe comments section is dying faster than the Legend of Sasquatch.... I guess I'll go feed my disembodied taterhole fish his daily dose of swamp eel.
ReplyDeleteIf I were to make up an imaginary creature and when asked why there is no evidence I would come up with the following traits for my made up creature:
ReplyDeleteNocturnal
Intelligent
Hyper aware
Super fast
Can detect cameras
Inhabits remote areas
Buries their dead
Has identical dna to humans despite being physically incomparable allowing them to evade dna testing
Hang on isn't that the same as what the footers come up with?
Now that is a schooling.
If I was terrified so bad of something as potentially as big as ten foot that can pop off my head like a soda bottle, that is lurking in my backyard, making me feel uneasy enough for me to get popa's gun out next time I go camping, then I would deny the following...
DeleteNocturnal
Intelligent
Hyper aware
Super fast
Can detect cameras
Inhabits remote areas
Buries their dead
Has identical dna to humans despite being physically incomparable allowing them to evade dna testing
I guess my stupidity and incapability to provide anything other denial in the face of ten thousand years of evidence schools myself.
I'll go back to my video games.
Real Science:. " We left out X trail cams for Y months and photographed every last animal known to exist in the area. Not one photo shows a previously undiscovered animal.. The probability a large primate inhabits this particular area is extremely low..."
DeletePseudo Science: " We left out X trail cams for Y months and photographed every last animal known to exist in the area. Not one photo shows a previously undiscovered animal..This proves Bigfoot exists because they are avoiding trail cams, and only animals that exist can avoid things..."...lol....
^now that is a schooling
Delete"Hey Joe, just FYI. I was on an overnight trip last Thursday/Friday with the law and public safety class students I teach. We were in the field as I was teaching night surveillance, etc. I showed the students the difference between Generation 1 plus night vision and Gen 3. We used both to observe/collect data in total darkness. Gen 1 night vision uses the same technology that Infra-red trail cameras use at night to take photos without utilizing the "flash" that the trail camera uses during the day to take pics. (According to the trail cam manufacturers, the game will not spook because of the lack of flash). When using the Gen 3 technology at night it does not omit an infrared beam. The Gen 1 plus uses infrared to enhance its night vision. Although IR is invisible to humans, it is clearly visible to any animal that has nocturnal vision. I proved this to the students by allowing them to observe me using the Gen 1 plus while they viewed me using the Gen 3. The Gen 1 plus omits what looks like a huge flashlight beam when observed through the Gen 3. Although the Gen 1 plus cannot be seen with our naked eye, it is glaringly obvious with the Gen 3. Although I used this training to drive home a point about never using Gen 1 for surveillance (the bad guys may have Gen 3 or better night vision and they will know you are there, etc.) some of the students who are hunters immediately said, "any animal who sees in the dark could see the gen 1 plus."
DeleteFor those who are skeptical of this info. test it for yourself.
Archer1"
... that was from my friend who is a hunter of many years. Furthermore, Bigfoot are not dumb animals and have the capacity to learn, as opposed to people like you.
Schooled severely.
Not really schooled you just made that up based on your belief system. You can't prove any of it.
DeleteLack of trail cam photos is probably the main smoking gun for the whole religion. The topic usually gets footers riled up because they know how stupid they sound trying to explain away the lack of a bigfoot trail cam photo.
"Not really schooled you just made that up based on your belief system. You can't prove any of it."
Delete(Sigh)
The comment I provided you was from an outdoorsman of many, many years... If you are a creature with all the mental capacity of a human, that has learnt for the past 200 years to stay away from human technology (guns) for it's survival, and has watched people from a far erecting such things, and has nocturnal vision... Then there is your reason for Bigfoot avoiding trail cams. That does not make that notion one based merely on faith because you have no counter argument for hard facts. That is logic you and your theory group have come to master and one I very much enjoy pointing out at your expense.
I think you could make up your own religion; Denialism has many followers, many of which have their arsses handed to them on a daily basis here like you... You should have followers in no time.
POW!
The reasons for the trail cam to take few pictures of the bigfoot are well documented and my buddy Joe just did one above and I know who Archer 1 is and have a lot of respect for him. Go and look at the Jacobs photo and you will see a fairly good trail cam of a juvenille.
DeleteChuck
Jacob photo is a bear. Jesus people.
DeleteAll I have to say is either Patty is fake or all these skinny assed Squatches you people try to pass off as real are fakes or misidentified.
Patty has a big ol' diaper butt when even Paul Freeman's footage didn't have a super butt.
Bigfoot are like us in the respect that they are all different sizes in proportion to age, sex, etc... Patty's buttocks move. I can see them move, and so can countless others... not a lot, but they move.
DeletePeace.
Mmhmm. Whatever you say.
DeleteI say fake with clear motives and ability.
You say real creature and honorable men.
Still patty is the only diaper donk bigfoot so....FAKE
Take a look at 'Leaping Russian Yeti' and at the still of him in the air... The big arss is actually a major feature in eyewitnesses account descriptions.
DeletePeace.
The "gymnast" supposed bigfoot video dismissed by Poling several months ago also was a huge-bottomed character. Perhaps BEB will repost that one, and also the video of the African girl raised by animals or whatever it was; she had enormous buttocks also. I don't know why BEB continues to drag its heels over these two videos and this topic.
DeletePLEASE REPOST THESE VIDEOS SHAWN!!!!
DeleteI like me some big hairy ass.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteWAZZZ UPPP!!!!
DeleteSup!
DeleteWho loves you baby!
DeleteJoe fitz got smoked.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely layed to waste.
^^^ Dreaming happily in Skeptardia.
DeleteBill munns has successfully sequenced pattys genome.
ReplyDelete..I thought it was the other way around: Since there is 0 physical evidence and not a single photo from a reputable media outlet and\or a professor whose reputation means everything, we know they bury their dead and live in underground caves with state of the art bio-chemistry labs..lol,,,.
DeleteReputable media outlets are not out looking to photograph Bigfoot, and you can't get more credible than Sykes' involvement in the Bigfoot research field.
DeleteSchooled.
You also can't get more smoked than sykes finding no bigfoot.
Delete... And then suggesting relic human populations have been possible...
DeleteSchooled.
... populations that are 100% modern human.
DeletePwned.
... That are relic in origin.
DeleteSchooled.
Look at how the world, not just the bigfoot community is celebrating Sykes results! PJ seems to be the only one celebrating Sykes.
DeleteNo one else is.
Not even Shawn Evidence and he scrounges the bottom of the barrel for stories around here.
Just another day of PJ being tarred and feathered. I fart in your general direction.
Well that's where you're wrong actually, most of my circle are in agreement, so are many who expressed that here anonymously, and if people don't see it that way, then that's their opinion. If you are of the opinion that Bigfoot is human, that Zana was a Bigfoot, and then can acknowledge the proportions of Kwit's skull and that Sykes suggests it possible for there to be a relic population of humans... Then that's a win! Not a total win, but in the face of you people piping up and claiming closure; that's a win.
DeletePeace.
See here...
DeletePJ and 'his circle' are the predominant Squatch majority!
Only circle that accepts it though.
^^^ I fart at thee
DeleteMost heartily!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteSykes has pictures? I must of been reading emails on another screen during that part....lol.. Look, it was previously conjectured from anecdotes about Zana's appearance\ behavior and anomalies in her kin's skull that she was a representative of a relic pop of some homo species-Neanderthal the heavy favorite....That has been put to bed.
DeleteNow, the same anecdotes and skull anomalies are the basis of the conjecture that she is from some previoulsy unknown race of humans...At best, that is a lateral, stagnant move vis a vis an argument for the existence of almas.
Stagnation is not good: Its incompatibility with technological and economic advancement killed Nessie and put 8 foot ape-men on the respirator...
The Neanderthal theories are Russian based and one that many I didn't agree with anyway. Zana's description is of a Bigfoot clearly. You have a watered down version of this morphology in Kwit and you have an alternative theory from Sykes that this could be down to a relic population of humans out of Africa.
DeleteDeal with it.
Peace.
Sometimes a taterhole is just a taterhole.
ReplyDeleteJoe fitz ? Canadian guy !! In one of your posts u r talking about a bf video were it goes from walking to all fours ?????? Which video is this ???? I want to see and also I herd that Rick dyer has bought the MN ice man and if he did the one he has is a fake cause it would be the second ice man cause the first one witch was suppose to be real was lost or sold to somebody ? What your thoughts on this??? And what's new man??
ReplyDeleteGoogle is your friend Canada Guy.
DeleteJoe fitz!! Also could u imagine the keep quit check $ u would get after harvesting one of these animals From forestry industry cause the impact would be to much to handle?? Wow ???
DeleteThe video I'm referring to is 'Leaping Russian Yeti (MK Davis version)'...
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTddczieNdQ
... On 1.48 seconds you'll notice the subject drags it's body along with it's arms... Imagine doing that in that terrain? You' break your wrists! Let me know what you think buddy.
Peace.
I've watch that on my I phone cause it's the only computer I have my wife won't let me touch her computer due to my terrible computer skills lol but that video from what I can see is 100% real !!! That's a bf monster and that's how they move! Just like there floating threw the air, truly amazing why doesn't someone clear that video up ?????Canadian guy
DeleteCanadian guy!! What do u mean google is your friend ??? I do love the google thing and less than a year ago I discovered you tube ! Pretty funny ah! What rock have I been living under for the last 45 years lol
ReplyDeleteLeaping yeti is buy far best video out there to date!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let's see someone replicate that one???
ReplyDeleteHave you seen this yet? It was shot here in FL at a state park. Check out the length of the arms and the fact that it snaps that tree like a toothpick. I've seen young pines exactly like the ones in this video snapped in exactly the same fashion...some broken and twisted back, others snapped completely in off with the tops nowhere in sight.
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCRnE-XT-qw&feature=share&list=PLpZUhDuN0gdu4Byf327jhw2H3LEFkyTYA
Could the self aware disembodied taterhole fish actually be a bloke in a suit?
ReplyDeleteLeaping russian yeti is a bloke in a suit on a pogo stick.
ReplyDelete^^^twerktard approved
DeleteJoking aside, the pgf is a bloke in a suit.
ReplyDeleteIts a modified gemora made by a master craftsman patterson. Chris packham, a very respected biologist also confirmed this fact backed up by some interesting details revealed by Gimlim.
The very foundation of the religion that is bigfootery is a hoax. Backed up by no bigfoot before or since the pgf.
Packham; a kids presenter employed to help children sleep better at night (it has worked in some it seems)... and then had to edit an interview with Gimlin (it is common knowledge this was the case) to make his sham of an suit less significant to the laughing enthusiasts. Goebbels would have had him shot in shame.
DeleteIt is efforts on the scale of religious nazi-ism reflected by people frequenting here with lies and desperate claims in a smear campaign that forgets that they still haven't proved Patty is a hoax, and in that failure... There is your Bigfoot in all her glory.
'All jokes aside' (that means you)...
Got monkey suit?
How was the interviewed edited? The segment where he talks about roger hoaxing him is uncut.
DeleteI think I will trust packhams opinion over yours....
Edited sorry... And if you think Packham's version of Patty is a good enough reason to believe it was a hoax... Then I think that is a greater leap of faith in comparison to acknowledging that in 46 years with all the technological advances, that Patty can't be replicated.
DeletePeace.
Pwned taterjoe.
DeleteTalking smack about Chris Packham, who has infinitely more biological knowledge of animals and actually travels the world in search of creatures. PJ hasn't even left Wales.
Second of all, are you positive it's an edited segment with Bob Grimlin? Care to prove it or is this another one of your unfounded claims only backed by opinion and old national enquirer clippings?
For all this crap you still have nothing conclusive to show the skeptics. Must suck.
Chris Packham, who has infinitely more biological knowledge of animals... Has to edit a video to back up his sham.
DeleteFunny you should bring up a archeological and anthropological studies, describe them to national enquirer clippings and then talk of things that are conclusive after defending Packham's effort at Patty! Ha ha ha ha ha!!
"Duh... No evidence! Fart, swear, burp... Hick up! No evidence! Fart burp, hick up! Nose pick, fart... Duh... No evidence!"
Funny you should make another post without showing proof o your claim.
DeleteI want proof that Packham edited Bob's telephone call to make it sound as if he said something out of context.
You said that's the way it was, so prove it.
It's pretty obvious the entire phone call interview was edited, because you don't hear the entire exchange... You do not hear Gimlin explain himself as well as he probably would have liked and from this snippet of an interview, Packham focuses on a small statement, a rational reflectance on Bob's part (to which anyone would in thinking over an incident so life changing and profound time and time again)... And twists that as his main reason to denounce the footage as a hoax. Implying further that Gimlin has let the car out of the bag, so to speak. Gimlin's statement, to anyone who is impartial, would suggest merely he has nothing to hide and like he said... It would have been a pretty risky prank considering he had a rifle loaded and pointed at Patty. I have also worked in editing and know how easy it is the manipulate the viewer.
DeleteNow your turn to show evidence of your claims...
"Duh... No evidence! Fart, swear, burp... Hick up! No evidence! Fart burp, hick up! Nose pick, fart... Duh... No evidence!"
Schooled!
Just what I figured.
DeleteMore PJ claims that he can't prove.
Cramps... You live closer to Mike than most... You get on with him great, why don't you pop over to his ranch and spend the night, just once? Would it hurt that bad??
DeletePeace.
I'm halfway across the country right now. No where near Texas or Missouri.
DeleteI'm not out to prove bigfoot so why would I waste my time walking about the woods at night in search of nothing?
Sup Ball Boy.Scared of the woods I see.What,no Nair to be had in the woods?That's ok. Just dangle them over the camp fire.
DeleteBecause the only thing that would revitalise your enthusiast stance would be an experience.
DeleteWith the amount of effort you put into this blog, I would have thought a proposition like that, you could of at least acknowledge if you were closer to Mike.
No probz.
8:14:
DeleteCorrupt Chris Hackham ambushed Gimlin by creatively editing a telephone call.
Hackham's Strutting Orange Stickman attempt at a Patty redux was wet-your-pants-hysterical in its monumental scale of failure.
Such is the religion of skepfoolery that drooling subhumans wearing blinders continue to sally over from the JREF to "take action" and they step in colossal cowpats on every mission.
A skeptard falls ignorantly into every word trap set for him or her.
Danny you get home this minute!!
DeleteYeah Danny get home quick! Your girlfriends legs have been spread wide open. Me and my Bro's just pull a train on her! Next we will let in the PR's and after the Chunks! Yeah Danny boy, you better get home!
DeleteLots of calls about creative editing yet not a single shred of proof for it outside of the typical "well I know, so therefore take my word."
DeleteDoesn't matter how much you post around me, doesn't make up for the complete lack of bigfoot.
I offered an explanation for my claim.
Delete""well I know, so therefore take my word."
... That's a little something we all are a little guilty of it seems Campz.
Peace.
Contradictions of footers:
ReplyDeleteBigfoots cover up their tracks.
Thousands of bigfoot tracks have been found.
Bigfoots can detect cameras and avoid them.
There are many photos and videos of bigfoot.
Bigfoots have an ability to be able to avoid humans.
Bigfoots are seen by thousands of people each year.
Bigfoots are highly intelligent.
Bigfoots dont use tools or fire or have civilisation.
Now that's a schooling.
Not all Bigfoot cover their tracks and if this happens it is usually in areas where they are aware civilisation penetrates. Tracks that are found 50 miles into wilderness areas are the result of Bigfoot being relaxed of intrusion.
DeleteBigfoot, when photographed by people, are usually taken off guard, whereas they can't be taken off guard by trail cams that they more often than not have watched be erected and then can detect via nocturnal vision.
Bigfoot can detect civilisation but it is civilisation that encroach on there home and are largely seen whilst hunting or feeding. Bigfoot are also curious of people and this accounts for a significant amount of sightings.
Bigfoot bury their dead and have language (culture)... They understand fire but do not use it due to it being an indicator of their whereabouts and there are coultless accounts of them using clubs.
I keep seeing you imply schooling, however the only one who's learning anything is you.
POW!!
Preach it, brother!!!!
DeleteLOL!
~JP
Gotz, U a good - 12 gage shotgun beez a good huntin rifle – for critters, U need follow up shots – 000 buck and slugs rounds will take care of it no problem. Looks like bigfoot travels in groups so da one U are shootin @ be aware there beez others about. So if U goes out for da big guy U might want to take a few buds with and do like we did in the army and set up a fireteam to cover the guy that is shootin. If U do go, bewares thar be bigfoots abouts… Happy huntin : )
DeleteAK 47 w/scope be a good huntin rifle – for critters, U be right follow up shots required – 30 round mag w/154SP rounds will take care of it no problem. Looks like bigfoot travels in groups so da one U are shootin @ be aware there beez others about. Been a few cases it these parts of hunters finding this out the hard way. So if U goes out for da big guy U might want to take a few buds with and do like we did in the army and set up a fireteam to cover the guy that is shootin. If U do go, check with the locals some will talk about these type of critters, U be able to narrow down your area to cover. Happy huntin : )
ReplyDeleteIn the immortal words of Mike Wooley, "Do not engage with creatures, because if you do, you will lose."
Delete^these creatures
DeleteYou'd need something more along the lines of a .50 Beowulf...slow and hard hitting. But good luck hitting one or getting close enough to sight it in.
DeleteFor the record, I'm NOT pro-kill...I just don't mind discussing it because they can and do handle themselves just fine. Plus, I've heard first hand of an incident in which an evil poacher was "dealt with"...and it was not a pretty sight!
:)
~JP
Care to elaborate JP??
DeletePeace.
I would love to hear about that one too J P.
DeleteThis took place in a national forest in a northwestern state in the US…
DeleteA female park ranger was out patrolling alone, as she was also en route to meet up with two more fellow park rangers at a cabin that they stay at from time to time. When she got to the cabin, she noticed a series of traps and snares apparently set by a poacher. Still waiting for her co-workers to show up, she began collecting the traps.
As nighttime was quickly approaching she received a call on her radio from the other rangers explaining to her that they would not be able to make it to the cabin until the following morning. As she had gathered the last of the traps and was making her way back to the cabin she heard movement in the woods, but by then it was completely dark outside and she could not see anything.
Unbeknownst to her, the poacher was watching her pull up his traps and needless to say, had become enraged. The poacher followed her and broke into the cabin and started coming towards her making violent threats and demanding she return his traps.
It’s also worth noting that she had left her firearm and gear in her truck and had no way to protect herself from the angry poacher. As the poacher lunged towards her, all of a sudden he was snatched from behind by his feet and fell face down, being dragged out of the cabin by his legs and into the woods, screaming the whole time…she heard one final, blood-curdling scream and then dead silence. She quickly closed the cabin door and placed a barricade plank across the door and stayed put until daybreak.
When she finally went outside, the other two rangers were just arriving and together they searched the forest for signs of the poacher…they found his torso wedged high up in the crook of a large tree and his head and arms were scattered around the area. She said it looked like someone or something had taken the body and spun it around in a circle, covering the area with blood.
The official report stated that the poacher had fallen victim to a wild animal…
Great stuff! Have you heard of the Dyatlov Pass incident? One if the campers (or whoever they were) were found in an exact same way.
DeletePeace.
No, I've not heard of it...I'll Google it right now. Thanks!!!
Delete:)
Gotz, U a good - 12 gage shotgun beez a good huntin rifle – for critters, U need follow up shots – 000 buck and slugs rounds will take care of it no problem. Looks like bigfoot travels in groups so da one U are shootin @ be aware there beez others about. So if U goes out for da big guy U might want to take a few buds with and do like we did in the army and set up a fireteam to cover the guy that is shootin. If U do go, bewares thar be bigfoots abouts… : )
DeleteKnow that is a commercial Jack Links needs to make. Thanks J P
DeleteLOL! That would be the best marketing campaign ever!!!
DeleteLet's PARTY motherfuckers good afternoon ladies and gents I had a great short work day you should be happy too let us toast to FRIDAY and good times adios bitches I'm off to PARTY
ReplyDeleteI'm with you Harry!
DeleteAlpha Dog Chuck,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your awesome encounter with us!!!!
:)
~JP
Hey JP!!!
DeleteAnything else in the pipe line???
Peace.
I very much look forward to anything else you are working on. I can't celebrate you and Freeman enough.
DeleteMuch respect.
Also... Your first eye witness experience with the grey Sasquatch that leaped from tree to tree... Amazing!!
DeletePeace.
Post leaping Russian yeti video Shawn!!!!!!!! Please!!!!!!
DeletePost leaping Russian yeti video Shawn!!!!!!!! Please!!!!!!
DeletePost leaping Russian yeti !!!!!!!!
DeletePost leaping Russian yeti !!!!!!!!
DeleteThanks for the kind words, Joe! I'm considering writing Communion 2, but interviewing only women habituates.
DeleteI'll definitely let you know if and when it happens!
Other than that, I'm working on a book of my personal encounters and experiences, as well as the knowledge and understanding I've gained since being introduced to their "world".
:)
Awesome, thx JP!
DeleteWell that's something to very much look forward to. Great to see you post JP, much respect bro.
DeletePeace.
Thank you guys!
Delete:)
“You reason well, and your wit is bold, but you are too prejudiced. You do not let your eyes see nor your ears hear, and that which is outside your daily life is not of account to you. Do you not think that there are things which you cannot understand, and yet which are, that some people see things that others cannot? But there are things old and new which must not be contemplated by men’s eyes, because they know, or think they know, some things which other men have told them. Ah, it is the fault of our science that it wants to explain all, and if it explain not, then it says there
ReplyDeleteis nothing to explain. But yet we see around us every day the growth of new beliefs, which think themselves new, and which are yet but the old, which pretend to be young, like the fine ladies at the opera.” – Professor Van Helsing [Bram Stoker – Dracula (1897)]
This has to be my favorite quote of all time...
DeletePost more often JP, it would be amazing to have your thoughts on when ever possible.
DeletePeace.
Thanks for the shout out J P. Plan on reading the book very soon and learning some new things. Your quote from Bram Stoker pretty much sums up how I see this earth, universe, and all the unexplained.
ReplyDeleteChuck the Alpha Dog
Joe is wrong.
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is Bullshit.
Poop in A Jar and carry on traditon.