Bigfooting With Kelly Shaw: The 19 Inch Bigfoot Track Way Revisited [11/9/2013]
Kelly Shaw and the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization have been updating us on their expeditions for the past month or two. They research reported sighting locations in South Idaho and Northern Utah and then occasionally do squatch research outside of these areas. Here's the latest from Shaw and his team, on the "The 19 inch Bigfoot track way revisited":
We revisit the Rough Hollow track way of 19 inch bigfoot footprints. 11/2/13.We casted a very nice footprint in this track way.
11/2/13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acyYTUZQXgo
This is what the amazing track way area looks like in snow and ice less tan two weeks later 11/9/13.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0VqsLf6pz0
The local Rancher informed me that he has had 57 Bear sightings in and rear Rough Hollow 2013. Two of those bears were Grizzly's. He has also seen two wolf near Rough Hollow. Plus the Wild Life management states that this area has the largest concentration of Mountain Lion in the State of Utah.
Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization has found dozens of Bigfoot foot prints back in Rough Hollow in 2013.Physical evidence suggests, up to 6 different Bigfoot individuals use, pass through and or live in this area.
GUESS WHO'S FIRST????
ReplyDeleteALL CAPS
Keep up the good work Kelly!!
DeletePeace.
WHO THE HELL IS KELLY, JOE?!
DeleteALL CAPS
Maybe you should try at least glancing at the articles posted before commenting all caps.
Delete:). Joe Kelly is an American Hero. Kelly Joe us a girl I once bought shoes for.
DeleteBigfoot is already proven not to exist assholes... This site is getting sadder every day.
ReplyDeleteHow do you prove something doesn't exist?
DeleteThen why do you still come to this site?
DeleteIf he hasn't seen a Bigfoot then it 'doesn't exist'. It's the way of mainstream science, so he's in good company.
DeletePeace.
The fact that he comes here... Now that's merely down to attention he can't get in the real world; pretty sad.
DeletePeace.
... Attention seeking makes you spew all sort's of claims; like 'Bigfoot has been to not exist'.
DeleteCurious little fellows these.
Peace.
"Hey joe why the fuck would a 100% modern human dna bigfoot be able to run at 30mph on 4 legs?
ReplyDeleteYou literally have no clue about how absurd the things you are claiming are.
Admit you got pwned by sykes and move on."
This was a pearler from yesterday! Ok... Answer me this, how can Zana have the description of a Bigfoot and the behaviour of a Bigfoot and be reported to be able to outrun a horse... And still have 100% human DNA?!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!
The biggest 'pwning' in the world is getting all excited by the first two and three quarters of a three piece documantary series, only to be pooped on right at the end! I wish I could have seen the following people's faces;
King Klown
Jackass
Crampz
Muir (Burger King)
Sensitive boy
And all the other anonymous joker boys that waste their time here and that thought Footers were getting a schooling!!
And we still have the long term study with two bombshell DNA samples to follow!!
Classic schooling.
Smoked footer^
DeleteJumping on anything offered and claiming its proof of a bigfoot.
You can't have 100% human dna and then claim all the other things as well. It doesn't work like that I'm afraid.
No doubt patty is one of your human bigfoots. Arm length is longer and coned head and night vision but dna is still 100% modern human. Unbelievable what a smoked footer.
Oh yea its "coming soon" yea... lol. How many times do you want to play that card? Sykes was the smoking gun. No unknown primate found in North America. As predicted. Is it a coincidence that skeptics are always right and ALL hyped "proof coming" has turned out to be nothing every single time. No. No coincidence. Its just inevitable when looking for something that doesn't exist.
You wanted sykes to say "yep we found unknown primate dna in North America" what you actually got is a 100% modern human and descriptions from a racist 19th century village who have never seen an african before. There is no basis in fact that zana was anything but a human. In fact you could say its been proven she was human. Oh wait yes didn't sykes say that. Pwned.
Sizzled like a sausage. Time to put the lid on the bbq and smoke you thoroughly.
"You can't have 100% human dna and then claim all the other things as well. It doesn't work like that I'm afraid."
Delete... Well Sykes can? Take it up with him boy! Ha ha ha ha!!!
If you want to take the very clear descriptions of Zana and cling to the theory of racist locals... Expecially when you have the exact same morphological differences in Kwit's skull, then that is such a leap if faith and I laugh at you... Denial is a bitch bro, let it go or it'll eat away at you!!
I'm not claiming to know the long term results of his study... But my point is to highlight how schooled you are in looking for closure on this subject during these documentaries being aired; you thought it would be the end of Bigfoot with this series, yet you got schooled with the relic theory and there is still so much more to come!!
POW!!! Like a brick to the face!!!
That's all Sykes did was determine the origin of supposed Bigfoot samples... A really stupid, desperate for closure numpty would take from that, that Bigfoot isn't real. There are also another 38 samples that we don't know the results of yet. Ask yourself this... Why is Sykes still associating with Bigfooters? Is it a mere coincidence that he has come to the relic human theory off the back of long term research with this type of people... Is it a clue? I'll leave you to sweat and boo-hoo over, that's all you've done since episode 3 is cry and wine and I love it!! Remember... This is just deserves for encroaching on other people's interests. Silly boy.
Wakey, wakey... Your version of events is a dream!! Ha ha ha!!!
Coincidences? Coincidences like Zana's racist descriptions and Kwit's skull proportions?! Laughable and I'm really enjoying you babbling, fumbeling your type of logic. This is what happens when you stick your nose where you're not welcome and pipe up when you know nothing... You get your arss handed to you in the most spectacular fashion.
Bigfoot are humans... And if Sykes says that you can have a relic population from the same species, then that's your problem not mine. Now go and cry on a ghost blog of something... Cause you've been served like a streaming hot turd panini!!
Ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!
PJ Footsgerald,
DeletePlease limit your posts to 17,5000 words or less.
Thanks,
Management
Schooled.
Delete"Well Sykes can? Take it up with him boy!"
DeleteSykes doesn't claim any of that you moron. All he claims is zana is 100% modern human maybe from a relic population (but still modern human). The rest of it is claims you have pulled out of your ass that are completey unfounded and unscientific.
Khwits skulls was declared within normal human range. This was stated by grover krantz so there goes that argument clean out the window.
You really are getting desperate for a magic ape aren't you.
Just accept sykes didn't give you the unknown north american primate that you thought he would. At least most footers have the dignity to acknowledge that. You on the other hand are acting so butthurt about it that you resort to moronic theories that have no basis in fact making your stupidity rise exponentially.
Deal with it. The bbq lid is still firmly shut for a thorough smoking.
Sometimes PJ gets them menstrual cramps real hard.
Delete"Sykes doesn't claim any of that you moron. All he claims is zana is 100% modern human maybe from a relic population (but still modern human)."
Delete... You're contradicting yourself there bro... Steady on.
"Khwits skulls was declared within normal human range. This was stated by grover krantz so there goes that argument clean out the window."
... With all due respect to Krantz; wasn't he looking for an upright gorilla? I think I'll take a genticist's opinion over his. Also, more lies... The skull has been studied and it has a elevated brow ridge, bigger teeth, an extra bone in the neck, bigger jaw, bigger eye sockets, and much, much bigger all round. Don't take it from me... Take it from Sykes.
Contradictions and lies would be a sure sign of desperation old boy... Leave it go and come to terms with it. Deflecting to the Bigfoot samples is a convenient way to snake out of acknowledging Sykes' theories but you'll find that I have always maintained that the Almasty and Bigfoot are the same thing... Especially in the face of an exact description of Bigfoot behaviour; a description that was taken from people who saw Zana first hand and before a time like now where Bigfoot has become popular culture... Consistencies and an actual skull with the same proportions means you are left scared and vulnerable to the truth. If Sykes says Zana, in all her glory might have been a relic human, then so is Bigfoot.
I think you'll find anyone with a brain can accept that a few bear samples don't debunk Bigfoot... Forget the majority of Footers who you make another claim about.
You are simply dancing the dance and have been reeled in again today like a turd on a hook, because you are butthurt nobody else. You answered the call and you are getting schooled by your own contradictions and lies, cause that's all you have left now that your celebrated Sykes wee-wee'd on your parade. And I love that... I would have still been here if that didn't happen and I'm sure as hell not gonna let you forget about it now it has!
POW!!! THWACK!!! BOOOOM!!! SMACK!!!!!
Schooled like the laughably dim individual you are. Ha!!
Joe,
Deleteyou suck.That is all.
Joe somehow got from zana is 100% modern human to bigfoot exists. INCREDIBLE.
DeleteLook at the Zana description, then look at Keit's skull, then look at the DNA results, and then look at Sykes' alternative theory.
DeleteSchooled.
Joe. You are tenured at last. Congrats. My battle with Autmn Forest. Who has called me a Bigfoot Harasser and Cuber Bully is on!! In the interim I say. Congrats to Kelly Shaw, unannointed Bigfoot Researcher of the Year and Professor Joe Fitzgerald. Two heroic champions of the Squatch. M
DeletePs. I'm pretty sure she meant Cyber Bully. And media whore. Add that to her list of insults. Ms Forest. I am a Multi Media whore. Get your libtard socialist facts straight. And as for being a Bigfoot Harasser, I spend 200 a week on food and gas. What has that hairy lazy bastard Bigfoot ever done for me besides stay out of camera range and chunk rocks from his anonymous tree. Autumn. Have you ever heard the phrase kiss my country ass?
DeleteI wasn't aware the bigfoot community was up in arms and celebrating Sykes 'alternate theory'...oh wait it's not. Funny it's the top of the world for taterjoe
DeleteDaniel. You have been my worthy opponent in many a battle. I ask you now. In the face of Autumn Forests stinging criticisms. Am I a Bigfoot Harasser? Cyber (sic) Bully or media whore. We've got to take a stand Dan. We can't neglect to celebrate Joe's speculation coronation and straight up tenure at UBH by cow towing to left wing socialist witches and their "earth mother" feminist superiority complexes. I need you Dan. Help!
DeleteWhat is U.B.H ,? Mike B.
DeleteIt’s great to see good information being shared and also to see fresh, creative ideas that have never been done before.
ReplyDeleteVery well explained. I would like to say that it is very interesting to read your blog.
CCTV CAMERA IN PAKISTAN
They let you guys use the internet over there, Anita???
DeleteNo Joe, no bigfoots no giants no orang pendick. So to keep you're self occupied I want you to start a company that harvests the grain from English crop circles and have it processed into bread. You would make a fortune selling it to new age folks and then you could fund your own expeditions.
ReplyDeleteI think you'll find that Bigfoot has not only not been proven to be nonsense, but in fact has the biggest geneticist in the world claiming relic populations of human are a possibility.
DeleteUnlucky bro... Go and cry into your ricycles; crop circles don't have science upsetting you like this. I think I'll harvest the tears of upset Tardists, bottle it and sell it as computer monitor cleaner back to them suspectingly; you'll look through a layer of your own shame next time you dribble lies on to your keyboard.
Boooooooommmmm!!!
Lol^
DeleteSmoked footer extraordinaire
Joe fitz !!!!!!!! It's Canadian guy did u ask John my questions about were he thinks bfs go in winter season and when he thinks there mating season is I'm interested to here his answer?? Joe fitz what's he say??
DeleteJoe fitz sorry but were is he doing his research ????? He never said I don't need a excact location ??? Canada???
DeleteHey TTL!!
DeleteI'm pretty sure John replied to you on the page you amazed him the questions... Go back to that and if there is anything he didn't answer let me know.
Peace.
Hey Canadian guy, Look at the "Little boy encounter" page, and the "Tim Fasino page" for the answers.
DeleteJohn W. Jones Spoke
John w. !!!! It Canadian guy just read your post and u gave some good answers thanks and I now your not looking for my approval so don't take anything I say like that or let anything I say I don't now the right word I'm terrible at grammar or anything to do with a computer me just typing on here is like a 4 year old or a slow death !! Lol so bare with me, I'm glad u said they do a semi hibrination witch I just spelled wrong ! Lol I'm in Canada they do the same thing here and also come winter once the lakes start to freeze they move up hill into the mountains witch are able to access but if u spend a couple days in minus 30 to 40 degress getting there and the bfs are a no show your not doing it agian belive me !! As I'm typing this I'm thinking of walking through 2 feet of snow, sweating and then freezing once u stop at the top !! Lol Here in this area it's almost like they follow the moose cause come winter are moose herd up and head up to higher elevations and they have no pressure cause the hunt is over and bears are sleeping so far game for bfs. I also like the fact u use fishing line, me also in the past! I didn't get a answer about there mating season from u but here they mate in the fall ( august) ! Right now I have forgotten what else u were talking about so I have to go back and check ttl !! Canadian guy have a good day John W and joe Fitz anything u guys want to add or ripp on me about ??? Feel free I can take it or anything u disagree with tell me and I still think they are monsters even just due to there size 10' and hairy that's a monster! Think about it!??? Have a good one guys!!
DeleteHey Canadian guy, Iy's John, I responded to your questions on several different pages on this site. the little boy encounter, and Tim Fasiono page.
DeleteJust in case you miss it, i'll answer again now. It is my opinion, that their mating (Rut cycle) begins in late August through October.
On our August expedition, We experienced a lot of Rowdiness, a lot of Chimp screams, Big heavy loud howls(That were not Bears) and one of my Team members (A negro) was injured by rock throwing. They even tried to stampede the Horses by constantly throwing Rocks and large branches. In other words A lot of action in August. So I think the Males were feeling Horney and where we camped by a small river, the females must of been on the other side. As during the night, we heard a lot of splashing (which were not beavers) The splashing sounded like something large crossing the stream. Also at night, the beavers were smashing their tails a lot (which is their warning slap) but we weren't near the stream. so what was alarming the Beavers?
You have to be there in order to appreciate what we were going through. A lot of Abnormal wildlife behavior, why?
We really search a lot in the winter, but hardly ever see their tracks. My native American relatives say they live out the winter in large pine trees and in hollow trees.
After a snowstorm, and after about 3-4 days, especially when the sun breaks out, all animals start to move. Tracks are everywhere, especially around Beaver swamps and flows. But never any Big foot tracks. So they must be in-active. Plus thiese mountain ranges are vast, high, rocky steep etc. it's hard to cover so much ground!
Well, I think I said it all. I'll be glad to write with you again anytime. I'll be very busy as I am trapping now, mostly Fox and Coyotes, soon Beaver. Plus writing my book, I have very little time.
John w. Jones Spoke
Canadian guy !!! John great response ! The rut here is the same I think in the winter here they head up to higher elevation just like the moose and I do belive they semi hibranate also in the winter ! Thanks agian for the chat! Will talk later, and thank joe for me he seems like a great guy! Anyways have a nice day also I responded to u yeaturday on one of these blogs or what ever they are? Anyways ttl
DeleteThere once was a Squatch from Nantucket who liked to take dumps in a bucket....ehhhh, F__k it.
ReplyDeleteWe shit in jars around here.
DeleteHow often is Joe let out of the jar?
DeleteI keep me spliffs in a jar. No poop, mon.
DeleteAttempts to educate joe is futile.
ReplyDeleteFeel sorry for the guy.
Nice footprint.
ReplyDeleteExceptional!!
DeleteNo evidence of any bigfoots existing anywhere ever. All there is is made up reports, blokes in suits and crazy people. Lots of crazy people.
ReplyDeleteNo bigfoot though. It don't exist.
9 foot apes wandering around America super elusive won't ever go near humans (apart from when they do if we believe all the reports) lol. Insanity.
Boring!
DeleteSeems like you got a bit smoked there joe
DeleteWhat joe heard from sykes: "bigfoot is real"
ReplyDeleteWhat sykes ACTUALLY said: "zana is 100% modern human"
Zana who is described as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws . Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately...
DeleteBack up evidence? Kwit's skull.
Schooled.
Sigh.
DeleteKhwits skull in human range.
Zana 100% human.
That's a smoking.
Jeepers Joe. Able to outrun a horse. Something the worlds fastest human on record, Usain Bolt could not come close to doing. Throw in the other features you describe and you know what. You just described a bigfoot.
DeleteChuck
Chuck. I agree. I cannot imagine the speed they can produce. Hope you are doing well. Joe is tenured now. We are celebrating. M
DeleteNo ape in New York. Sorry big John.
ReplyDeleteNo big John in New York either. He's a faker.
DeleteCome up to Tannersville, N.Y. and tell me that to my facem you'll find out how fake i'm not! Got the balls? No, I didn't think so!
DeleteThen Anon 6:31 Why don't you come with us, I'll pay for everything. May's expedition is filled with a true "Skeptic" but you can come on our June trip. Contact me at:
Deletehealthyhappylawns@reagan.com
I have a question for anyone who feels like answering it, if I had shot at a sasqwatch in August 2006 and hit it in leg and it never fell just kept going, but it left a blood trail for couple hundred yards and I gathered some of the blood on leaves, sticks etc put it in my pocket than put it in a bag would they still be able to test it even if it's just still in the same bag not frozen or anything? Also if I had it tested at one point and it was 100% human? Any thoughts??
ReplyDeleteJoe disregard this post above
DeleteCongratulations--you shot a human being.
Delete6:41!!!!
DeleteOk... Does this mean you did test it and it came back 100% human????
6:41!!!!
DeleteDoes this mean you've tested the DNA?! I need details and I need a contact detail if possible?!!!!
Joe disregard the comment about shooting bf and. Getting blood !!
Delete6:14 is just trying to give you some excitement for the day Lol!
Delete6:41!!!!!
DeletePLEASE MORE DETAILS??????!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course they can't test it over seven years later.
DeleteAgreed. You seem to have an interesting story to tell.
DeleteJoe be careful. 6:14, aka John Doe has the upper hand.
DeleteJoe have you ever read an anonymous post you didn't believe? I usually assume every anon poster is trolling, the fact that you never show any scepticism makes me think you must be a troll.
DeleteIf the trolls went away and left people express themselves, then we'd find out if they are legitimate or not, wouldn't we?
DeleteGo away troll.
I'm expressing my honest opinion, not trolling in anyway whatsoever, I hope you are too. I appreciate your enthusiasm for the subject, if it is sincere my only advise would be to be more skeptical of claims posted here.
DeleteI'd say you need to get your scope re-sighted.
ReplyDeleteNow if someone can only get novel DNA results that are posted for free and have these results verified by blind testing....there is someone, Melba Ketchum! Were there chains of custody? Sykes had chains of custody, right?
ReplyDeleteJoe fitz !!!!!! Canadian guy this whole Bigfoot search is going to come to a end very soon I just want to see what it really consist of as far as animal/human ? There is enough awareness out there now and I think people are more hungry than ever for results which leads me to belive there's going to be some great video coming out soon and than were going to see a body cause of that!!! What r your thoughts joe fitz???????
ReplyDeleteI am totally convinced that this creature is human. It has language, it buries it's dead and it has DNA is too close to ours to recognize a difference.
DeleteI honestly think that if we're gonna bridge the gap, we need to do it the same way as we would with any indigenous tribe of people.
Peace.
We've historically exploited and destroyed them, though.
DeleteAll the more reason to prove that we can now be respectful.
DeletePeace.
We need to bag one.
DeleteIn order to prove these guys are human we need a specimen.
History tells of many BF's being culled over the years and I am aware of many groups who take a pro-kill stance.
I wish there was another way, but we either leave them or resolve the mystery. Being human, we simply cannot leave them be. We are hard wired to hunt and alas none of these big guys are coming quietly.
We could be looking at a species on the brink of extinction. We have encroached on their habitat and forced them back into the most remote, wild places where survival is difficult.
Providing that sample won't be easy however. When you get folks like Derek Randles who spends his life out in the woods and logs an encounter around every 10 years or so, this is an indication that getting a big guy in your sights could be a once in a lifetime opportunity.
MMG
Joe fitz also curious what u thought about the bf being neiphillia or what ever that giant human thing is!??????
ReplyDeleteWhy to worry for YouTube subscribers when YTBPals is here to help you out to get free YouTube Subscribers with very little efforts. Sign up now and get 10 free subscribers instantly.
ReplyDeleteAlso checkout our other sites
For pii email e9d48ac2533bded18981 visit now [pii_email_e9d48ac2533bded18981]
to get Free guest posting, Explore now LetMePost
to get Free InstaGram Followers Explore InstaGix Now