We Are Watching The Sykes Special Live (Updated #4)
We're a little late to the live feed of the Sykes Yeti special, but here's what they're talking about, so far:
- They're going to discuss whether or not it's possible for a bear to creature a "doublestep" that makes their print look like a bipedal footprint.
- 300 year old Tibetan manual script reveals that Yeti refers to many versions of bears.
More to come... Check back here for updates...
[Update] OK. So, there's nothing really new that we didn't already know. Apparently, there's an ancient polar bear in the Himalayas that's undiscovered. The next step now is to find it.
[Update #2] We're waiting for someone to upload the episode to YouTube.
[Update #3] Here are Adam Davies thoughts he shared with Nadia Moore on the revelation about the new hybrid bear discovery by Dr. Sykes: "I think its exciting. It’s just one type of the `Yeti` though. I have interviewed people in Nepal who know the difference between a Yeti and a bear. The anatomical analysis done by the presenter was also very superficial. The explanation given for the divergent toe found in Yeti prints was wholly inadequate. The analysis of records was also flawed. I chose not to appear in the program myself. There are accounts of Yetis written many centuries earlier that describe a `wildman`. I could go on. I do think Professor Sykes is a decent honourable man. That is why I have said that people should wait to see all the results gathered and his experiences which will be detailed in his book. I know there is plenty more to come yet. But I don't hold my breath for the second episode personally. Sykes analyses the evidence as he finds it. This is an exciting find but its just one part of the explanation of the Yeti, not the whole."
[Update #4] Here's the video:
Last
ReplyDeleteTie
Delete...another anti... FU bigfoot don't exist guy!!
DeleteCapper is delusional, he lost.
DeleteHot tip: bigfoot doesn't exist.
Delete- hot tip guy
I'd get your hot tip seen to by a doctor.
DeleteThose weekend's spent with Bangkok lady boys can have an adverse effect your pee pee.
MMG
^ butthurt footer, pwned by Sykes and angry at the world tonight.
DeleteSykes did what Sykes had to do, find a diversion and excuse so the Bigfoot type species can live on as legend. People will have encounters still after all (worldwide), so coming out and denying the existence of an undiscovered big primate isn't going ot happen just like discovery isn't. Not becuase they aren't of course, but because they can't reveal what they are.
Delete^^ confused skeptard left wondering why science didn't know about a 7ft tall 800lb creature wandering around low population density areas.
DeleteThis couldn't possibly be correct? What if....???
Sleepness nights for some huh?
MMG
^ pwned footer
Delete^ lamest of the lame
DeleteI win
ReplyDelete^fantastic false first, congrats!! there are no TIES in this game junior, you LOSE!!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou got SMOKED capper, removed out of embarrassment?
DeleteMy pants have been removed by the author.
DeleteIts finished.
ReplyDeleteThe yeti is a bear.
Smoked.
Joe, mmg put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Three samples?
DeleteCompletely definitive.
Thanks to Sykes for proving there are still creatures roaming this earth that we have no knowledge of.
MMG
MMG got taterholed then smoked.
DeleteLol... mmg give it up already
DeleteYou smoked my taterhole?
DeleteYou seem the type.
MMG
MMG we are all laughing at you. You got smoked and you know it.
DeleteMMG is very angry tonight with his nothing. Watch out!
DeleteSykes looked at only three samples and despite this he came up with a hybrid bear that science had no idea existed.
DeleteThought you skeptics had the world all sewn up?
One unknown to science creature confirmed in week one.
The biggest revelations have still to come however...
MMG
skeptics do not have the "world all sewn up" what a fucking ridiculous thing to say
Deletethey just dismiss the magic monkey man that's all
The truth here though... Laughably, at the peoples who want closure to this' expense; is that three samples cannot account for the history behind the Yeti.
DeleteAn Asian Bear is amazing, but that doesn't mean anything about Yeti if you step back from what is being suggested in this documentary.
Peace.
You can never proof Bigfoot doesn't exist, right MMG? You are completely delusional.
DeleteAnd thus we see how the magic monkey myth persists when given nothing.
DeleteAs great as the programme was... I expected a little more for groundbreaking stuff. Haven't they known bears hybridize in the States for a long time?
DeletePeace.
YGNALI
DeleteJoe, the groundbreaking thing isn't just a bear hybridisation but that one of the bears is a thought to be extinct species of polar bear. Think to be honest the Yeti myth has been put to rest here by Sykes and would imagine that if the Nazi bear could yield DNA they would be 3 for 3 with these samples. I think the show only used the three samples as they had the best stories attached for a documentary subject and Sykes has already said that they only tested samples they hadn't already discarded as known species. I would imagine that left the three that made the basis of this show. I think that the idea of it being a relict homind is just from the double paw prints being misread back in the 50s, people jumping to conclusions especially when locals talk of a beast on two legs. The new translation of that ancient text says a lot, think its just the wild imaginations of foreigners in the 20th century creating ape men where even the locals and their ancestors says it's bear.
DeleteDoersn't anybody find it oddly convenient they find a new bear during a bigfoot/yeti search...
DeleteIsn't that good on the side of hope if there's an 800 lb extinct polar bear running around that bigfeets could also be
DeleteThat's not exactly right though. Many enthusiasts have put the 1950's footprints found in the himalaya to bed for the exact reasons that were stated in the programme tonight. That isn't really big news to anyone who agreed with it the first time it came around, with this viewpoint accounting for what I would say 80% of enthusiasts. The footprints example taken of the grizzly bear in America simply does not account for prints with dermals, scaring and toe bending.
DeleteAlso... Through history the people to that region have used the name Yeti for a couple of different creatures all categorised under the label of what the word translates to 'that thing' or 'that creature'.
Three samples to a glass half empty viewpoint would seem conclusive... Three samples to a glass half full viewpoint would say that three samples; are three samples.
Think how little an amount that is. To suggest that these are 'the best the world has to offer'... Again is quite a claim and one from a viewpoint that does not consider how big a region that place is, to which ironically for the skeptic... With this discovery begs the question; 'what else is hidden out here.
Definitely a win for cryptozoology tonight. The Footers will have to wait a little longer.
Peace.
That post was to 1:45.
DeletePeace.
Good point...still, that's if it even still exists. The sample was approx 40 years old wasn't it? Seems promising anyhow, that a 900lb bear may still be around albeit rarely ever seen, just like Bigfoot...
DeleteOr they could just be misidentified bears Harry, the areas where the Yeti is supposed to live are a lot different to the Sierras or Florida swamps. I don't know for sure bout Bigfoot but think the Yeti is more like Yogi and Boo Boo. The only people who seem to believe different are the few westerners that have visited the area and jumped to conclusions.
DeleteThe translation of the 'Ancient Text' was interesting.
DeleteAnyone notice that the picture on the manuscript clearly showed a human wildman and NOT a bear.
The translation was very 'convenient'. If the Yeti was bear the locals would simply say 'Yeti' is just another name for a bear.
MMG
I know that I believed for a long time till I seen hoax after hoax and became jaded but that doesn't give me the right to kill others hopes and dreams
DeleteHave they ever found Yeti prints with dermals? Think you're jumping to conclusions based on a picture drawn thousands of years ago. Think it's all a case of misidentification by non-natives when it comes to Yeti. Plus that second footprint they showed from the riverbank looked more bear than anything hence the conclusion that German climber came to, it's a bear.
DeleteReinhold Messner clearly saw a bear.
DeleteHis picture of the print he encountered in no way resembled Shackleton's.
MMG
Computer says no big hairy people.
ReplyDeleteDamn.
Ha ha ha ha!!
DeleteThat's was quite funny.
Peace.
Hey Joe, I'm guessing only us Brits would get that hey? :-)
DeleteJoking aside, I really enjoyed the programme. Although there were no giant hairy people this time round, a discovery (or rediscovery in this case) is always good. Wish I had your faith that the big guy is out there mind, it's unshakable and gotta admire that. Don't get me wrong, I do believe there's something and have my own theories but there's always that nagging doubt. That said, I respect both sides equally but draw my own opinion at the end of the day like everyone else - only healthy to have some scepticism right?
Just out of curiosity, how confident are you that Bigfoot is out there and exists? Personally, I'm 60/40 these days, mind you that changes more times than dyer's hoaxes but gotta keep an open mind hey.
Also, what do you personally think Bigfoot actually is? Human? Animal? Hybrid? Misidentification?
Genuinely interested to hear your thoughts - aside from a few others, you seem to be the only person on here that takes the subject seriously.
Always been interested in Bigfoot (and Aliens, hell, everything "unexplainable") since my mother bought me a book called 'The Unexplained' as a kid - it's where I first read about Patty and been hooked ever since.
Just saying...
I can't agree more with you comment and very much enjoyed reading it bro.
DeleteOk...
To me, the sheer number of reports from people of all walks of life, for the length of time that has been the case (ten thousand years if you consider native legends) means that there simply has to be something to it. From here there is a transition from such legends into settler's diaries that are ridiculously consistent. Jim Vieira has come acroos a 100 years worth of printed media up and down the country, that describe giant skeletons being uncovered up and down the country, in a time when populations were seperated geographically. Many think that this creature is a dumb ape which would obviously leave a fossil trail and would have been found by now. Burial mounds though suggest a much more intelligence capable of culture and evasion capabilities and would also explain why there are hundreds of accounts of disturbing such mounds in libraries up and down the States (the Cherokee shared burial mounds with them) and would articulate further why we don't come across the remains of these creatures, especially when 70% of the country is covered in wilderness, to which it turn suggests how hard it would be to locate such burial areas, especially once the old native regions of New England for example were churned up and taken over during the industrial revolution and then covered up as quickly as possible to suit the economic boom.
I think that these creatures have withdrawn even further into pockets of the country after seeing how the closest homo sapien tribes were treated by Europeans and this over time would try and shed some light as to why these creatures require to evade us so badly.
Again, according to Native American legends these creatures understand how to even use fire and have used various tools over the ages such as primitive forms of baskets and sharpened sticks to spear fish. Again... Jim Vieira has come across the documentation of countless native American burial mounds that have uncovered giant skeletons with giant tools and sometimes even weapons. The When considering the Australian Yowie (and I use this creature in comparison as I firmly believe I am talking about the exact same creature), there is a fascinating account of 'The Wildman of Monaro' (you can find this in Google Image Search) that tells of a sighting of a gorilla-type being holding what appeared to be a nulla-nulla; this is an Aboriginal war/hunting club. Furthermore; the images of Medieval European Woodwose almost always portray these beings as possessing a large stick-like club (along with snatching woman and children which amazingly is consistent with American Bigfoot legends).
Here is a link to one of D L Soucy's newspaper reports of the Grand Canyon from 1903... Where a report of a Bigfoot with a club is read out...
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/watch-grand-canyon-bigfoot-encounter.html?m=1
Peace.
Bear double step proven: CHECK
ReplyDeleteYeti known as a bear to the locals: CHECK
Dna confirms its a bear: CHECK
Yeti myth pwned, sasquatch and alma to go.
Mulder is gonna be pissed.
The double step evidence was pretty poor.
DeleteNothing like the Shackleton photo.
Nothing like anything in Meldrum's or Barackman's collection.
MMG
Lol^ looks like its back to patty for you. Science says no monkey. Again.
DeleteWow MMG, just wow.
DeleteBack to Patty? The Jayrefing twerktards do almost nothing but go back to Patty, day in and day out.
DeleteSykes has so far proved the existence of one cryptid.
err how is that a "cryptid"?
Deletefooters jumping on this as a win for there field is just hilarious
no cryptid has ever been found, bigfoot, Nessie you name it, all looney toons
REAL animals are found by REAL scientists all the time, this is another one.
Have you any idea how far Nepal is from the Arctic Circle?
DeleteIf you want to compare this incredible find to the Lilliputian Beetle then you are supremely deluded my friend.
MMG
Lol and you want to compare a possible hybrid of a well known and documented species to an 8-10 footer/800 pound relic ape that is super intelligent, buried its dead, and covers its tracks... when it feels like it.
DeleteSquatch track look nothing like bear prints double or not they're human shaped because that's what the squatches are. But we the public can't know of it, sadly.
Delete'A well known and documented species'?
DeleteExpect a call from Sykes as he's pissed that you already knew all about his discovery.
MMG
Smeja on next week. More confirmation on bears to come.
ReplyDeleteGot monkey?
Parcher?
DeleteThis is all so exciting! TEEHEEEHHEEETTEEEHHEEEE...Why is he looking at that same old yak udder yeti skull cap? Old news different day.I vote that Dr. Sykes gets inserted into again by say Tom Biscardi? Where is Dr. Moneymaker when you need him?
ReplyDeleteWhere Matt is? Planning his next hoax, I guess.
DeleteI thought joe said sykes would be coming to prove bigfoot? So what happened with that then?
ReplyDeleteHe did say that and is hoping it is forgotten.
DeleteJoe is learning it the hard way, took my a few years too going from the less likely ape theory to the more likely hominin and now probably alien. Look, they couldn't even find an ape and they seemingly can't find the hominin either so there aren't too many likely candidates left anymore to explain the obvious cover-up.
DeleteThis is a journey bro, and trust me... I've never said I'm not open to the idea of these creatures being something else all together.
DeleteBut that is for another conversation I look forward to having with you another time.
Peace.
Next week: Smeja
ReplyDeleteBet it will prove smeja is full of smegma and that it's, once again, bear.
Damn.
we already know he shot a couple of bears, its what he originally posted on a taxidermy forum before some footer took him down the rabbit hole
DeleteWasn't that footer the most credible Derek Randles?
DeleteYes. Thank you for answering your own question.
DeleteSo lame.
Maybe we should have subjected Smeja to a lie detector test to get to the bottom of this? :)
MMG
Thank you Dr Sykes for finding a new special bear. What else that big could be hiding out there in that region?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunate for Cryptozoologists that the samples were missidentifide Yeti samples.
I must say though that the footprints and theories of missidentifide Bigfoot sightings are typically old ideas that are nothing new to skeptical use, and do not account for what people claim to have seen for several thousand years.
There is a long way to go on this... I thoroughly loved this opening episode, really looking forward to the next two. There is much more to come.
; )
Peace.
LOL^
Deletecould you BE anymore butthurt?
WOW JUST WOW
absolute smoked
VROOOM VROOOOM
Joe has been taking it balls deep in his tater for the last few days guys, let's give him a little respite. Peace.
Delete(Sigh)
DeleteRemember the reviews and don't pipe up too soon people. Don't set yourselves up...
Peace.
TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
DeleteVROOOOOM VROOOOOOM
How many more sleeps, joe?
DeleteVROOOOM VROOOOM!!!!
STFU Nard
Delete^ butthurt footer, a well documented hybrid of retard.
DeleteHey Harry.
DeletePeace.
Vroom vroom Harry, you pathetic weakling. Fuck off before I give you a throat punching you won't forget.
DeleteOh you sooo scary are you still upset I didn't give your mom bus fare when I was done you'll get over it
DeleteJust checking in. Any Bigfoot/Yeti proof?
ReplyDeleteno, they don't exist, science has proven it yet again
Delete1:11 twerktard living in fantasy land of care bears and candy canes. Ha ha ha guffaw.
DeleteAs Sykes tried to teach you, science can't prove something doesn't exist.
Your own buddy Disotell warned you of that to.
COOL STORY BRO^
Deletecare to show us this monkey then?
no?
well shut the fuck up and take your meds.
Prove me that unicorns don't exist. You can't. Still they don't exist anyway.
Deleteholy mother how much stupid you are...
AHAHAHHA
Deletethis thing that Sykes didn't disprove Yeti by discovering a bear is utterly crazy. So, let me understand:
1. If Sykes comes up with hard evidence for Yeti, then Yeti exist!
2. If Sykes doesn't come up with evidence for Yeti, but with evidence suggesting that Yeti is a bear, well this doesn't disprove Yeti.
That way you never lose, eh little footers?
So sad...
True dat. True dat.
DeleteStand-in guy
You are quite correct.
DeleteFooters could not lose tonight.
Sykes looked at three samples. Definitive? No where near....
Sykes revelations has skeptics scared and confused.
The two samples that will 'change our understanding of HUMAN history forever' are waiting folks...
MMG
VROOOOM VROOOOM!
DeleteI'm all but confused, gayous MMG.
DeleteIt's you wasting your life, not us!
Is the spaceship here to get us yet?
DeleteBFE trolls listen up, bigfoots aren't monkeys you evidently are if you think finding a new bear means the presumed primate in question isn't there. Are you dumb or something, the covert operations of academia continues that's all.
DeleteLol!
DeleteThat's brilliant! A guy who spends his spare time trolling a BF blog claims he's NOT wasting his life!
Delusion personified.
MMG
There's just as much physical evidence of fairies as there is a 9ft 800lb monkey mang running the wilds of the world...
DeleteIf you want to look at it that way.
Just yet another instance of PJ and Co. getting plowed deep in the taterhole.
I swear footers are like the players in the NFL, being as your team is down 54 points and despite that fact when someone makes a tackle they get all cocky and celebratory...hey moron you're still losing by a bazillion points.
Pathetic.
Sure bears will overlap their hind footprint over their front paw print. But they don't consistently if ever, align exactly, nor have the same width and are without claws on the toes. Bigfoot does not have claws. Bears do have claws.
ReplyDeleteMulder has wings.
DeleteSame old bear print excuses mainstream science has always pulled on the public, just lameness to explain it away.
DeleteI think I will take Sykes hypothesis for the yeti over any footer. I haven't seen a footer come up with anything close for an explanation but Sykes theory is backed up by solid science. Why would I listen to some crazy internet footer over what Sykes says? Sykes knows what he is talking about.
ReplyDelete^^^1:14 Another twektard following the Schedule of Skepfoolery:
DeleteSince Sykes hasn't discovered a primate, it's kissy kissy time for the skeptards.
^^^Same loon who was fashioning a tin foil hat for Sykes to preempt results.
Now watch the predictable behaviour: Sykes is their new man, as long as Sykes keeps delivering results acceptable to skeptards.
Had Sykes found a primate this time, this same person would be in a lunatic retard rage decrying Sykes' credibility.
The most common animal in the skeptoid world is:
Hypcrite.
Still no monkey though. And still anybody proving it. Well, excpet Timmy-Fat.
DeleteBut we did find a monkey - YOU. ^
Deletevroom vroom
ReplyDeletevrooooooooooooooooooooooom
Goin' somewhere...?
DeleteClueless Joe is masticating furiously as he watches Sykes pound footard taterholes into oblivion.
ReplyDelete^^^Retard rage is a pitiful thing to witness.
DeleteA bib and a crash helmet for inmate number 1:18.
Got monkey?
DeleteNo, Yeti's not a monkey. Got suit...?
DeleteOnly 7 more sleeps til Sykes finally shows me the monkey!!!
ReplyDeleteBear, he'll show you a bear...
Delete"Dr Sykes is quite happy to discuss the negative findings of the research so far, but the groundbreaking results from two samples means that Oxford University require him to peer review these in a paper properly. This has not stopped British based newspapers running with the assumption that 'Bigfoot' has been proven to not exist via proven bear samples."
ReplyDelete- Fringe News
"Sykes has publicly stated on the BBC that his main objective was and still is; to find other species' of human on this planet. If he has found a new species of bear in that process, that is pretty amazing... But you have to be of a very high level of needing closure on something to over-see the fact that a bear in Asia does not disprove a Bigfoot in America.
(Sigh)
For Sykes to still have the fundemental stance and still be associating with Bigfooters, doesn't mean that the long term results of his study are already certain... It merely means that we have to wait a little longer... Because Sykes' obvious agenda has not been fulfilled yet."
- Joe Fitzgerald
"For the most part the samples he has tracked down for analysis have turned out to be known species such as humans, bears or apes; however two samples taken towards the end of his quest will "change our understanding of human history. Professor Sykes is a world authority on genetics and what he has to say about Yetis will shock the world".
- Taken from a very recent book review
No, no... The pleasure's all mine. See you tomorrow all!
Peace.
When we little men will be able to read this shocking news? Will we be able to handle this shocking news? Is coming out soon, right? Only 5 or 6 years maybe!
DeleteVROOOM VROOOM VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
JOE YOU LITTLE TATERHOLE, DIG IN UNDER A ROCK AND SAVE YOUR TINY PIECE OF CREDIBILITY LEFT!
DeleteVROOOOM VROOOOM JOE!!!
DeleteLooks like you pedestal is crumbling
DeleteLets see, three episodes. So as a Scientist, I know what the Scientific community is going to do to me when I come tell them what I found. So in episode 1, will just go with this undiscovered bear find. Will keep to the nice and tight "Scientific norm" and relax the zelots. Once they relax a little we'll began in episode 2 to give them strained peas. Most are very narrow minded and will absolutly choke if we just throw them a seak! Bigfoot is real! Thanks for watching, Regards!
DeleteBryan Sykes.
Sounds legit.
DeleteDWA^ nice try.
DeleteIt wasn't from a book review Joe, it was publicity for a forthcoming book not due for publication till February next year right? So it's marketing to get people excited for the book to pre-sell it to Amazon etc
Delete1:49 Joe u so funny
DeleteJoe has to clean the egg off his face
DeleteJoe, you have two weeks (two episodes) to get lucky. After that you will be the one schooled, over and over.
DeleteJoe, your enthusiasm is great but you need to realize science is pulling the wool over your eyes. Sometime during this investigation they took Sykes aside and informed him (if he didn't know or suspected it already) about the cover-up they have in place for this subject. Maybe offered him a large sum of money to play along, we're talking millions and most take the bribe. The truth will set you free, once you see this is how it is you'll feel a little calmer and wiser if still nowhere nearer the goal of squatch discovery.
Delete1:53...
DeleteThat was precisely me point... By the time of the book's release Sykes' complete work will be peer reviewed... With the 'two samples' and all. I can only hope that those two samples are what I think they are.
Peace.
Hey Fitz"\
DeleteHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you ASSHOLE
Two more episodes on the way with nothing new regarding bigfoot. Sykes will discover something new about human migration because he always takes DNA samples from the local population, that fellow retards is the discovery that changes human origins nothing bigfoot related.
ReplyDeletemeanie :(
Deletebut sweati yeti drew some lines on film frame in Microsoft paint!!!!
that means bigfoot is real right??
right???
MMG
yet another false mmg post
Deletesuperb pwning of the footers tonight,
ReplyDeletejust watching the rerun now on channel 4 + 1, cant get enough of that utter destruction of footers fantasies
CRYPTOS REJOICE! Idiot skeptards have to realize there are all kinds of things out there that science CAN NOT EXPLAIN.
DeleteYOU SPEND YOUR TIME ON A SITE DEALING WITH A SUBJECT OF WHICH YOU DENY. YOU GAIN PLEASURE FROM INJECTING YOUR DISBELIEF INTO OTHERS BELIEFS. AND TALK ABOUT OTHERS HAVING A FANTASY???????
Could be a spirit of anti-Christ. Checked your body for odd markings? Have you or your family ever participated in the occult. Thier is an unuseual since of evil about you. You should pray about becomming a nicer person and learning to mind your own business.
Cause what your doing is kinda COMMY. You a libtard? NEW AGER! TREE HUGGAR?
1:43, are you really a moron or only pretending to be one...? Bet you're we'll aware this is no real discovery not of a new bear nor bigfoot but merely the long-running scam by authorities. You're either part of that or the big fool here, tripping right into their trap.
DeleteSo then looks like Joe and MMG will be leaving this blog as Sykes did not prove bigfoot, I will miss you guys!
ReplyDeleteI'm still waiting to see the pick of this old polar bear jaw. Cause as you know, if they found some piece of jaw that they couldn't identify, we all know what would happen if they said it came from some giant deformed half human.
DeleteHey I know, lets call it an ancient Polar bear. Then in the future when other scientists find more Bigfoot, hum hum, excuse me---- Ancient bones, well------------------------------------------------------ we found more ancient Polar Bear bones.
Kinda like the thief holding the key?
Circular reasonning?
Pic of Jaw please?????
They showed it in the episode. It wass very long and bear like. Certainly not a human.
DeleteYeah it was not only about a foot long but had a huge canine attached and was completely the wrong shape for a primate.
DeleteSo it is just a coincidence that bryans dna results just happened to be bear? Looks like that illusive monkey got lucky yet again!
ReplyDeletePlenty of hoops for the footers to jump through, never a monkey though.
Ya, Where's the monkey that became a man? You find that bone and I'll get you a bigfoot bone! Dumbass^^^^^^^^
DeleteThat monkey didn't suddenly become a man it evolved from one into many different species before it got to us, dumbass
DeleteWELL THEN, SHOW ME ANY-ONE OF THOSE MULTITUDES OF THOSE DIVERGENT SPECIES dumbass^^^^^^^^^
DeleteYour so fucking stupid, you don't even know the scientific talking points. You better let a real EVO-TARD handle this argument.
Which one would you like to talk about you crazy Christian fucknut
DeleteAnon 1:55,anon 2:01 has a point,even Darwin said that the gaps in the evolutional record was more of a missing chain than a missing link xx
DeleteANY ONE THAT SHOWS OR PROVES IT EVOLVED? tHEY DON'T AND NO SCIENTIST CLAIMS SO. THEY JUST HAVE A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT SPECIES YOU IDIOT!
DeleteWhat is Scientifically proven, at least in our recorded in modern time, is that we see degrdation of DNA. In other words, we see things DEVOLVING. We DON'T see things being ADDED into DNA strands. Which is what would have to happen in evolution, understand. It is a FRAUD!
DeleteI believe Darwins theory of evolution is wrong,consciousness didn't evolve from matter,all matter is created by consciousness xx
DeleteYes I agree. We must endeavor to keep the Aryan blood pure.
DeleteYes I also agree. The last thing we need is a bunch of Germans running around with Austin Powers teeth screaming Zieg Heil.
DeleteYou do understand that it was muslem countries and liberals who supported the Nazi principals.
DeleteNone of which i care to have here! It's funny. Somehow when an Idiot liberal losses an argument, they resort to a false association. It was most deffinetily a Liberal agenda who supports the Nazi's
Prooving once again what a brainwashed bunch of idiots you tards really are!
While Hitler mentioned Christianity a few times, he and his crowd were most deffinitely occulttists and Pagens. You could associate most closely to the modern new-age plus ancient bloodline beliefs and then misx in thier supperior intelect through SCIENCE..
DeleteWHEN MEN THINK THEY BECOME GODS, THEY BECOME DOOMED BY GOD! The Bigfoot Patriot
Sorry,Anon 2:49,i don't know if your comment has anything to do with i said but i don't really know anything about Nazis except they they were nasty and Liberals?i don't know much about politics other than politicians are all full of **** xx
DeleteActually hitler was much less an occultist as some would have you believe he's lumped in there because goering was big into it hitler did like astrology but told goering there is no culture in a clay pot
DeleteI thought it was Himmler.
DeleteSieg!
Well, I guess I'm joining the skeptards, farewell footers!
ReplyDeleteBy, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. Take some of these other tards with you , would you please. And don't come back!
DeleteNo, no, im not leaving, ill be hanging around to troll and laugh at you stupid footers.
Deletethat was only episode 1 of 3 dont be rushing away just yet
DeleteOh let em leave. I don't want to hear all the crying and screaming whem Bryan tells them they need to be carefull in the woods!
DeleteDyer is coming.
ReplyDeleteSMOKED.
Ketchum is coming.
SMOKED.
Ericsson is coming.
SMOKED.
Smeja is coming.
SMOKED.
Sykes is coming.
EPICALLY PWNED, SMOKED, FRAZLED, TOASTED, BURNT TO A CRISP, DOMINATED.
The Dyer thing is a low blow you piece of shit! Nobody with any thing more than a rock or a turd bought the furt from Dyer.
DeleteJust shows what a turdball you are to throw him in.
Hey, tell us about all those SCIENTISTS who they caught faking info on GLOBAL WARMING!
Dyer in 2008 the footers were all over it and got pwned. Some of them came back for another pwning this year from the same guy.
DeleteIt's funny how they're 95% positive that global warming since 1950 is caused by man yet people like you seem to know better than people who are a hell of a lot cleverer and more educated than you. You're a Republican right?
Deletehttp://iceagenow.info/worth a look xx
DeleteEva if there is an Ice age can we get together and huddle for warmth in a sleeping bag. Please.
DeleteHi Eva, I'm afraid that's NOT worth a look. The self-published, vanity project witterings of Robert Felix aren't anything you should base your world vew on!
Deletehttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Robert_W._Felix
Anon 2:32 yes but bring a hot water bottle,xx
DeleteAnon 2:33,thanks for the link,i've just read it,but isn't that someones opinion?i read one of his books and thought some of his views were quite good xx
YES!!!
DeleteHi Eva, that wiki post isn't just someone's opinion; it's the general, rational consensus made by any number of experts who have a greater degree of knowledge than Felix in this field.
DeleteRobert Felix's book are the collected writings of one man; so truly they are someONE's opinion.
:)
Hello Anon 2:55,That's very true,but hasn't global warming stopped now?,i thought things were now getting colder xx
DeleteIts ok folks, Bill Munns says bigfoot is real!!!!!
ReplyDeleteAnd so does Karl Rose, the most vocal skeptic on cryptozoology.com
DeleteThere are countless first time prints that have a similarity in style of dermal ridging in the same way that two sets of finger prints from opposite sides of the country would look similar in style at first, regardless of apparent uniqueness under analysis. These casts cannot be explained away with desiccation because they have scar tissue and toe bending that many people who have done very thorough analysis have cited as the creature gripping into earth... Not claws. I would also like to state that there is a clear difference between desiccation marks and complex dermal markings.
ReplyDeleteI would suggest anyone in the remotest mindset to question casting processes to trot on over to the 'Fringe News: Sasquatch Canyon Bigfoot Tracks, Finding Bigfoot At the Discovery Museum, UFO in Bristol TN' blog page, as there are some amazing threads from very experienced casters who outline this process for you all.
Peace.
Plaster caster, grab ahold of me faster. If you want to see my love just ask her. The plasters getting harder, and shes a collector. A token of my love for her collection.
DeleteShut up Gene, your show's on A&E...
DeleteIf a skeptic is somehow "scared and confused" by evidence of the existence of Bigfoot or Yeti then they are NOT a skeptic!
ReplyDeleteHalf of the posters on here have absolutely no idea what a skeptic is, and they seem to be confusing the words "skeptic" and "cynic".
If a someone continues to refute the existence of something in the face of scientific evidence then they are not a skeptic.
I am a skeptic who happens to be obsessed with Bigfoot; however I really need to see physical proof of it's existence (preferably a body) rather than relying on "faith that it's real".
"Faith" is something you have when you don't have any good reasons to believe in something.
If BF is finally, scientifically proven to be a living, breathing creature I'll be absolutely delighted about it, as would any REAL skeptic.
It troubles me that there are so many Bigfooters on here who plainly are unaware of the true definition of the word skeptic.
Those assholes who continue to make idiot remarks at the expense of BFooters are "cynics", and I wish you'd refer to them as such.
So if you were camping in the woods and woke up with a size 9 poop chute would that be evidence enough?
DeleteTHIER IS NOTHING WRONG WITH YOU THINKING WHAT YOU THINK!
DeleteTHERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH CONTINUALLY BADGERING PEOPLE ABOUT WHAT THEY PERCIEVE TO BE TRUE, WETHER IT IS OR ISN'T!
ONE OF THE FOUNDING IDEAS OF THIS COUNTRY IS FREEDOM OF BELIEFS WITHOUT PERSACUTION!
BUT SOME FUCKTARDS THINK THAT IT'S WITHIN THIER PEROGATIVE TO COME AND TELL OTHERS WHAT THEY SAW, HEARD, OR EXPERIENCED. WETHER IT'S REAL OR NOT IS IRELLAVANT AS TO THE FACT THAT THE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SKEPTARDS ARE USELESS AS TITS ON A BULL AND SERVE 0 PURPOSE.
"Simply denying mainstream science based on flimsy, invalid and too-often agenda-driven critiques of science is not skepticism at all. It is contrarianism ... or denial," Mann told LiveScience.
DeleteInstead, true skeptics are open to scientific evidence and are willing to evenly assess it.
"All scientists should be skeptics. True skepticism is, as [Carl] Sagan described it, the 'self-correcting machinery' of science," Mann said.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=just-a-theory-7-misused-science-words&page=2
Peace.
Let me tell you how a skeptard is created. Like anyone, they hear something about this Bigfoot thing. So they start noiseing around the internet. They get hooked by a shithead like Dyer or other hoaxers. They tell someone "Hey lok, Bigfoot is real!" and then get laughed at when a true "Knower" shows them. Well thier so BUTTHURT over being shown to be STUPID!
DeleteAnd hence ---- a SKEPTARD IS BORN. It is therby been placed on his shoulders to proove to all the world that there cannot be a BIGFOOT!
-----Hey Tard. There is! I've seen one.
Right on Joe! Now if we could just get these Bigfooters to use the correct terminology we could really sort out the wheat from the chaff.
DeleteAnonymous posting about "The creation of Skeptards..." I think you're confusing your terminology!
DeleteSomeone who refuses to believe in the existence of BF until physical evidence is produced would be a "Skeptard".
Someone who is stupid enough to be a follower of Mr Rick Dyer would probably be a "Credulloid".
A Skeptic is one who is skeptical.
A Credulloid is someone who is credullous.
Might I suggest you visit any number of online dictionary sites, where you will find any number of concise definitions of both words, described in far greater detail than I ever could on this forum.
DUDE, I INVENTED THE WORD SKEPTARD!
DeleteYour President! And Bigfoot Daddy
melba said it was true
ReplyDeleteYou bet.
DeleteI like turtles
ReplyDeleteThey've made this episode with Sykes, because mainstream academia is in charge of the cover-up which is why Ketchum was attacked and never got her own episode even when Bigfoot evidently is what she found and not what a dumbass like Moneymaker is running around thinking. Everything is moving according to plan, so science (Sykes bought off) can keep their status quo and Matt still chases his dream monster.
ReplyDeleteYou Sir, are a conspiracy-laden buffoon.
DeleteYou might find it exciting to dream up little theories here and there, just like you've seen on the tv, but it serves no purpose other than encouraging non-bigfooters to look at bigfooters slightly skew, and think we're all crackpots.
Of course, if you've definitive, testable proof to back up your statement I'd be delighted to detract my rather dim view of you.
Can one of our British friends put this show on you tube for us, please? We'll forget about all that taxation without representation stuff.
ReplyDeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!!!
DeletePeace.
I watched it.My initial notes on Channel 4 TVs "yeti" programme titled "Bigfoot" (naturally):
ReplyDeleteC4s Yeti documentary. Travelogue. Talk about bears but not the reports that differ from what might be bears.
A brown bear paw cast that matches (if you take away the bear claws and ignore the dissimilarities) Shipton's yeti foot print -plenty of sarcastic comments suggesting hoaxy climbers and natives not able to tell a bear -and we are talking a BEAR- from what they call a yeti.
Two hairs dis-prove the yeti are anything than a bear "might be" "could be" "possibly" "If they still exist".
DNA was interesting but Sykes got 10(?) minutes of the programme and judging by a BBC interview he DOES have unidentified hair samples but it seems C4 cut that. If you have samples send them to him because he is serious even if the series isn't!
what a pile of s***.
Does the Yeti exist? Going by this programme -maybe, possibly, we don't know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IADAeQgq1Ks
Even if our modern definition of a "Yeti" is actually a mis-identification of a hereto undiscovered bear species it's STILL fantastic news!
DeleteA 40,000 year old living fossil is wandering the high regions of the Himalayas...astounding!
Amen Brother!
DeleteSomeone gets the magnitude of tonight's show.
HUGE!
MMG
Did someone get a new Dyson vaccum or a go cart. Please explane the Vroom Vroom. If it is a go cart I got a question. Does that thing got a hemi in it?
ReplyDeleteIt's PJ's looney space ship revving for take off to Planet Bigfoot were the houses are stick formations and the mating call involves knocking on trees.
DeleteListen to the billy Madison show from 2 wed ago all will be explained and hemi is great it's dodges transmission that sucks ass
Deletevrooooom
ReplyDeletevrrooooooooooooooommmmmmm
vrrooom vroom
vrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom
Good Morning Everyone,
ReplyDeleteJust a friendly remider that while we encourage spririted debate - trolling, attacking the argurer, and general snarkiness (Behave like adults) will not be tolerated.
We have received numerous reports on this thread today. Many comments are walking a thin line. Please temper you posting in a way that is in accordance with the Rules. Any further infractions will receive warning points.
HAVE A NICE DAY!
Michele
Michele, if you could delineate the "line" for us by pointing out examples of these infractions it would be extremely helpful.
DeleteOtherwise there might be a number of posters out there who are unsure of what is/isn't acceptable and thus would refrain from posting at all for fear of being banned.
Thank You
Michele
DeleteYour approach is far too restrained.
Examine the recent work of 'Big Ginger' if you are looking for effective, forceful moderation.
MMG
Personally, I am loathe limit the freedom of speech no matter how inane it might be, and think the best form of moderation would be for those who have a real interest in the subject to simply not "feed the trolls".
DeleteDon't pay any attention to them, don't take the bait. Look at their posts as white noise. They have very little brain power, and will soon tire and retreat to their clammy beds.
Congratulations to Daniel Campbell and commiserations to MMG and Joe Fitz
ReplyDeleteI hopin you guys find your bugfart!
ReplyDeleteWhy thank you, that's very kind!
DeleteJOE...GOT...FUCKING...SMOKED
ReplyDeletePeace.
i thought i heard the fat lady singing so came inside to find out if it is indeed over... yep yeti exists and it is a bear...
ReplyDelete