You know what I find is so funny when I go over interviews by these men and hear their side of the story. Is how every time they tell the story things changed in them. Even when they are asked the same questions the answers changed.
However people don't question that to these men when they see them or even seen them in these BF Confreres.
Plus as it was told by Bob Gimlin that he was closer to the Bigfoot then Roger was. However you don't even see Bob Gimlin in the film when they was filming the Bigfoot. So he had to be behind Roger the whole time. Now how can you believe anything these men say when they don't even have their stories right.
I seen it pointed out here when someone said if they film this creature they would have never lost the film like it was told in the story they tell.
Now I know people pointed out things in my research and even other people research on the film. But the facts are no one has seen or done research on the original film. If the film is so real as they claim it to be why not just show the whole film and get it over with. People talks about money then why not go to Miss Patterson and give her the money to show the whole film. Or does the facts show that she don't have the rights to the film. As it was told Roger Patterson sold the film to a movie company. So they are the ones that have the whole film and Miss Patterson only has a part of the film.
Another look at the time frame and their story.
Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin film this Bigfoot around 2or 3 pm Friday Oct 20, 1967. Note: But the film shows it was film at noon time by the shadows.
Now after they filmed the Bigfoot they looked for their horses and then changed the film and film some more then gone back the the camp site 5 miles from their camp site got the plaster to make the cast prints then gone 5 miles back to the film site and did more filming and making the cast prints and do some testing. Then ride back to the truck then gone into town around 8:30 to 9:30 pm to send out the film and start to tell the story. Now on Saturday Oct. 21, 1967 Al DeAtley gone to Seattle Washington to get the film it was around 10AM and when DeAtley got the film he got it developed and gone back home.
Note: Places that developed this type of film close at noon on Saturdays and that gives DeAtley 2hr. To get the film and find a place to developed the film within that 2hr frame.
Now on Sunday morning Oct22, 1967 Roger Patterson and Al DeAtley with John Green and another man seen the film at DeAtley house. Then on Monday Oct 23, 1967 they gone to BC to show the film and they shown 2 reels of film at 7pm that Monday. They shown the part of the Bigfoot and the film with the tracks and Roger making the cast prints. Now when Roger was ask can they have a copy of the film that shows the tacks and him making the cast prints Roger told them he will give them a copy of it by that Friday. Note: But, as it was told that second reel was lost. But in 1968 frames from that second reel was shown in a magazine. Plus as you know parts of that reel is also shown today all over the net.
As you see by the time line they tell in their story there is no way they can do all of this and get it done with in that time frame. There was talk about 1 reel of film then 2 reels of film then even 3 reels of film. No one really knows how many reels of film they filmed. Even if you read Roger Patterson book he had a camera with him and they did some filming and talk to eyewitness.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Pwned like mulder in the dark
ReplyDeleteYou know what I find is so funny when I go over interviews by these men and hear their side of the story. Is how every time they tell the story things changed in them. Even when they are asked the same questions the answers changed.
DeleteHowever people don't question that to these men when they see them or even seen them in these BF Confreres.
Plus as it was told by Bob Gimlin that he was closer to the Bigfoot then Roger was. However you don't even see Bob Gimlin in the film when they was filming the Bigfoot. So he had to be behind Roger the whole time. Now how can you believe anything these men say when they don't even have their stories right.
I seen it pointed out here when someone said if they film this creature they would have never lost the film like it was told in the story they tell.
Now I know people pointed out things in my research and even other people research on the film. But the facts are no one has seen or done research on the original film. If the film is so real as they claim it to be why not just show the whole film and get it over with.
People talks about money then why not go to Miss Patterson and give her the money to show the whole film. Or does the facts show that she don't have the rights to the film. As it was told Roger Patterson sold the film to a movie company. So they are the ones that have the whole film and Miss Patterson only has a part of the film.
Another look at the time frame and their story.
Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin film this Bigfoot around 2or 3 pm Friday Oct 20, 1967.
Note:
But the film shows it was film at noon time by the shadows.
Now after they filmed the Bigfoot they looked for their horses and then changed the film and film some more then gone back the the camp site 5 miles from their camp site got the plaster to make the cast prints then gone 5 miles back to the film site and did more filming and making the cast prints and do some testing. Then ride back to the truck then gone into town around 8:30 to 9:30 pm to send out the film and start to tell the story.
Now on Saturday Oct. 21, 1967 Al DeAtley gone to Seattle Washington to get the film it was around 10AM and when DeAtley got the film he got it developed and gone back home.
Note:
Places that developed this type of film close at noon on Saturdays and that gives DeAtley 2hr. To get the film and find a place to developed the film within that 2hr frame.
Now on Sunday morning Oct22, 1967 Roger Patterson and Al DeAtley with John Green and another man seen the film at DeAtley house. Then on Monday Oct 23, 1967 they gone to BC to show the film and they shown 2 reels of film at 7pm that Monday. They shown the part of the Bigfoot and the film with the tracks and Roger making the cast prints. Now when Roger was ask can they have a copy of the film that shows the tacks and him making the cast prints Roger told them he will give them a copy of it by that Friday.
Note:
But, as it was told that second reel was lost. But in 1968 frames from that second reel was shown in a magazine. Plus as you know parts of that reel is also shown today all over the net.
As you see by the time line they tell in their story there is no way they can do all of this and get it done with in that time frame. There was talk about 1 reel of film then 2 reels of film then even 3 reels of film. No one really knows how many reels of film they filmed. Even if you read Roger Patterson book he had a camera with him and they did some filming and talk to eyewitness.
TWO!
ReplyDeleteWhy the fuck can't I post as Mill Bunns anymore?
ReplyDeleteCopyright. Hovey will spank you.
DeleteOr whip you silly with swamp eels.
DeleteUNICORNS!!!!!!!!!! SHOW PONIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Banned
ReplyDeleteJoin Date: March 2008
Posts: 601
If Joe F. sees this, he will say it is a white Bigfoot!
ReplyDeleterhode island has the hard bodies... ummm
ReplyDelete