This Person Is The Best Interviewer Ever: Bigfoot Eyewitness Interview - The Smith Story
TopHat1211. Remember that name. This person (the interviewer) is going places and we hope to see more eyewitness interviews in the future. We're more impressed by the interview style more than the story itself. Watch and see what we mean:
Top - Hat...
ReplyDeleteWhy do people pretend they saw a mythical creature when all they saw is a bear?
ReplyDeleteBecause they live such dull little lives and need to manufacture some bit of excitement
DeleteYou've probably lived in the city all your life, but arrogant enough to second guess someone from the country who gives a very honest, credible interview, and who is damned SURE it wasn't a bear. The better question is: Why are you so closed minded to the evidence? Including, in this case, another credible eye witness account. Do you really think your judgment on this matter is superior to this man, who still doesn't claim who knows what he saw, but you do? You're the blind fool in this matter!
Deletehe didnt see a bear, it was a "barr" lol
Delete3:44
DeleteAnecdotes are not evidence im afraid.
People lie, hullicinate or genuinely misidentify things. Why rule those out and jump to the conclusion of a magic monkey that there is no actual evidence for?
People make things up, yes... But implying that all witnesses that have seen this creature do, is trying too hard to dismiss them and is again... Not in line with the scientific method skeptics claim is right in keeping this subject back. If these people really would 'love this subject to be proven', then they wouldn't dismiss every account as either money making schemes or lies. In their effort to dismiss people they consider liars of swindlers, they forget that the majority of researchers are just that to replicate experiences they have had that have changed their lives. And who has the bigger claim to mental illness? a group of people backed by ten thousand years of native culture, with hundreds upon hundreds of written media sources up and down the States in libraries, with footprints, DNA, a piece of transcribed language... people who consist of wildlife biologists, costume experts, forensic experts, forensic artists, forestry officers, doctors, lawyers, police officers, teachers, psychologists, historians...
Delete... or the people trying to deny those sources with nothing except mental illness claims?
It is so easy to lessen the magnitude of acknowledgement of this species as 'anecdotal evidence'... explain multiple person sightings then pal? Again you duck and swerve and ignore explaining things and just offer what comes so easy to you; cynicism. To go with the ten's of thousands of eyewitness testimony, we have a transition from ten thousand years of native culture in white settlers' diaries that for the time, had no way of contacting each other... This is what lends credibility to the natives, because more believable (in your eyes), Europeans saw these creatures as well. These accounts were then taken from diaries and written up in the news media of the day and are now in libraries up and down your great country... Hard to debunk eh?
Implying that all witnesses that have seen this creature make things up or have misunderstood what they have seen, is trying too hard to dismiss them and is not in line with the scientific method skeptics claim is being utilised properly regarding this subject... Mere denialism.
Your daily dose of schooling; served.
Peace.
Not really a schooling though was it?
DeleteYou offered up no actual evidence as usual.
Until you can do that then you remain perpetually pwned. No matter how many words you type.
Dermals, an accumulation of accounts ie. written news media, diaries & tens of thousands of eyewitness testimony (much of it multiple person), along with ten thousand years of acknowledgement, a transcribed complex language... scat, hair, unknown primate DNA... Is in fact reason enough for mainstream science to respond and investigate.
DeleteWait a minute... Someone has in fact chosen to break the mold and investigate?! Who's that gain... ???!!!
; )
Peace.
(Sigh)
DeleteStill no bigfoot anywhere ever and you know it.
ten thousand years of joe filling his mouth with cock.
Deletenow that's evidence.
Patty... Leaping Russian Yeti (MK Davis version).
DeleteGlad I could help!
Schooled.
Why do the skeptards care so much to make trolling an unhinged obsession? Why all the anger?
DeleteGuys?
They believe in the existence of Bigfoot otherwise they wouldn't be here... They just don't like people, or themselves.
DeletePeace.
I can tell by your choice of words and the way you structured your sentence that you're ignorant. Not just on this topic, but ignorant, across the board.
DeleteYou really shouldn't speak up in public places. You're just not equipped.
Go away troll.
Sorry... Are you referring to me??
DeletePeace.
As long as it's being covered up by the powers that be, what can you do. It's exactly this fact these brainless trolls live on, and many of them know it.
DeleteErnie if you check the JREFing credo, it urges all members to "take action." The easy way they bleeve to do that is to go on bigfoot sites and attack, and repeatedly, daily, ignore evidence. They are religious zealots, their religion being skepscience.
DeleteThey are fully invested in atheism and the theory of evolution; anything which conflicts with or threatens those religion beliefs, they attack and deride out of fear.
The attempts to discredit Sykes have already begun. They must preempt the release of Sykes' results with a smear campaign.
The panicked assaults on the Ketchum study are now being tempered by more science-minded people giving that study a second look as the dust settles.
They've made hay out of the eccentric things Ketchum has said or done. But many discoverers have been eccentric and unusual. Biochemist Kary Mullis got the Nobel Prize for developing the PCR DNA testing technique. He's also an acid-dropping surfer who uses astrology. JREFers would go berzerk on the astrology angle:
It doesn't matter, the man developed the PCR technique. No matter how many attacks on LSD use and astrology you make from here to Kingdom Come, the man developed the PCR technique with Michael Smith, The End.
What else can you say? Attack away; attack attack attack; Mullis developed the PCR test. JREFers can't change that fact.
Ketchum has said some eccentric things, but some scientists are standing by at least some of her results. Keep in mind that eccentricity in some cases may be a requirement for lateral thinking, new thought, discoveries.
Joe I think the Troll Hunter was after the "no bigfoot ever" commentator, our resident anti-bleeving-anything poster who hypocritically bleeves he/she has godlike omniscience (claims to know not just no bigfoot now, but ever, past or future).
I thought so, he's a top guy. Does it really request of people to 'take action' on the JREF?!
DeleteThat's the most fascist ******** thing I've heard in a while!!!
These people are the lowest of the low.
For the record I'm an atheist.
DeleteUmmm...First!?!?!?!? Yay me!!!!!
ReplyDeletePretty gay, retard. And sad, that your little troll boyfriends weren't here to support you. (Yay you!!!!)
DeleteGood try....Trollandia salutes your efforts...The President for LIfe Poop in a Jar Guy would be proud....
DeleteAye...someone stick something in TTH's mouth...my zipper is stuck.
DeleteThe interviewer likes to hear himself talk and project what he knows and thinks instead of listening to what the witness has to say. The witness has two much secondary movement to be viewed as credible. This is a subconscious way that someone not telling the truth diverts attention away from what is being said.
ReplyDeleteInteresting, however the details of motion and hair colour are consistent.
DeletePeace.
Hey Joe F, Frank Evans here. I am a friend of John W. Jones and his ex-business partner. i usually do not come on this site because of all the childish name calling. But John wanted me to get a message to you and another guy name Mike. he is having alot of signal problems to get anything out. i got just one email so far. I try to explain it as best i can.
DeleteThey had several top of the line trail cameras set up in a steep gorge which forces all the animals travelling to go thru it They got very clear pictures of Bears, deer, moose etc over several days. They also placed several fishing lines 7-8 feet up over the gorge which are constantly broken. Only something very large and tall can break them, yet the cameras never get a picture of what is breaking them. John say's it's very puzzling. He is of the opinion that there is something in these cameras a smell, noise or signal that make the Big foots avoid these cameras.
Anyway, Joe/mike if i get anything from him I will let you know. where they are it is constantly raining with sleet and some snow already. If you need to write anything to him, write it here i will be looking in from time to time. Or another friend named Gigger may also write here to you guys if I can't Talk soon
"The interviewer likes to hear himself talk and project what he knows and thinks instead of listening to what the witness has to say. The witness has two much secondary movement to be viewed as credible. This is a subconscious way that someone not telling the truth diverts attention away from what is being said."
DeleteI agree on both levels. Every time the witness goes to speak about what he saw - he rubs his face. He is not being truth full. His body language gave it away.
Hey!! Frank!!!
DeleteGood to see you post again sir! You should so more often. That very exciting news but nothing out of the ordinary as far as a capturing photographs. It's extremely puzzling to many as to how they can avoid such things as well as they do. Here is an suggestion from my friend Archer1 who posted here a few months back...
"Hey Joe, just FYI. I was on an overnight trip last Thursday/Friday with the law and public safety class students I teach. We were in the field as I was teaching night surveillance, etc. I showed the students the difference between Generation 1 plus night vision and Gen 3. We used both to observe/collect data in total darkness. Gen 1 night vision uses the same technology that Infra-red trail cameras use at night to take photos without utilizing the "flash" that the trail camera uses during the day to take pics. (According to the trail cam manufacturers, the game will not spook because of the lack of flash). When using the Gen 3 technology at night it does not omit an infrared beam. The Gen 1 plus uses infrared to enhance its night vision. Although IR is invisible to humans, it is clearly visible to any animal that has nocturnal vision. I proved this to the students by allowing them to observe me using the Gen 1 plus while they viewed me using the Gen 3. The Gen 1 plus omits what looks like a huge flashlight beam when observed through the Gen 3. Although the Gen 1 plus cannot be seen with our naked eye, it is glaringly obvious with the Gen 3. Although I used this training to drive home a point about never using Gen 1 for surveillance (the bad guys may have Gen 3 or better night vision and they will know you are there, etc.) some of the students who are hunters immediately said, "any animal who sees in the dark could see the gen 1 plus."
For those who are skeptical of this info. test it for yourself.
Archer1"
Thank you for posting Frank! Tell John we're all rooting for him and to stay safe out there!
Your friend, Joe.
Peace.
Joe fitsgerald since everyone says these bf don't exist should I shoot one while I'm out hunting if I get to see one during legal hunting hours? There's been over 10 reports over the past 8 years in the area I hunt and I see that a couple of the reports r on the bfro web site, I now I can't get in trouble cause what is anyone going to say really? And after doing some reading on the interweb and following these conversations on here which r mostly funny at best,! Seems a lot of people ask u questions and poke fun at u so thought I'd put my two sense out there to u! Anyways wondering if it would be a good idea seems like u guys need a bf hanging in some rednecks garage for it to be provin so like to hear your thoughts on this or anyone else's and most 90% of the sightings I. This area have been August sept which is during r hunt so I. Was thinking to just let her buck! ??????!???????????????????anyones thoughts ???????????????????????????
ReplyDeletePersonally I wouldn't think you'd get close enough to shoot one. That's my opinion based on the sheer ratio of accounts of people shooting them (that are credible).
DeleteI think it comes down to the question of whether you COULD kill something that looks like a wild human. Here is an account of a gentleman of the name of Mike Wooley, and though he had an opportunity to shoot one, his reasons for not even defending himself this way was because of how human-like the creatures chasing him were...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B18YDG_vXfc
There are theories as to why people are not being altogether successful in this, one being the domino effect (to which taking one step into the wilderness would trigger the first domino effect, etc), that experienced hunters talk about and though these creatures are very human-like; they do possess all the attributes and highly evolved senses of wilderness animals, along with one or two more it is loosely theorised, and this is in my opinion is the reasons behind its success in evading us for this long; a success that is based around it's fundamental need to evade us for it's safety that overrides anything else.
I am not an advocate of shooting one of these creatures, only in self defense, but there are many who would disagree with me and state that a body is the only thing that science would accept.
Peace.
Lots of squatches have apparently been shot before, so that really is not a good idea or reliable option when you think about it. It's been tried and nothing's come from it or pans out for the simple fact that every time a given body's been taken somewhere for presentation, be it newspaper or TV or whatever, certain people will stepped in and prevent it. So killing one to prove it or have notoriety just doesn't work, it never has or it'd already been in the papers as historical fact it's basically why it's still not publicly proven and remains a myth. It's all so very deliberate and planned, if you use some common sense here that is.
DeleteJoe fitsgerald since everyone says these bf don't exist should I shoot one while I'm out hunting if I get to see one during legal hunting hours? There's been over 10 reports over the past 8 years in the area I hunt and I see that a couple of the reports r on the bfro web site, I now I can't get in trouble cause what is anyone going to say really? And after doing some reading on the interweb and following these conversations on here which r mostly funny at best,! Seems a lot of people ask u questions and poke fun at u so thought I'd put my two sense out there to u! Anyways wondering if it would be a good idea seems like u guys need a bf hanging in some rednecks garage for it to be provin so like to hear your thoughts on this or anyone else's and most 90% of the sightings I. This area have been August sept which is during r hunt so I. Was thinking to just let her buck! ??????!???????????????????anyones thoughts ???????????????????????????
ReplyDeleteTodd R. Disotell, a professor at the Department of Anthropology at New York University, told ABCNews.com that Ketchum’s research is nonsense.
ReplyDelete“It’s just a joke,” he said. “She is a laughing stock of people that are of a community that are already kind of wacko.”
“This was not reported in any scientific way whatsoever. It’s complete junk science, and then she misinterprets it. She hasn’t published in peer-reviewed papers on this stuff. I don’t know how this got put together,” he said.
Disotell says that he has disproven samples from being what they’re claimed to be many times, including debunking a yeti, a chupacabra, and a sasquatch eight times, including once on ScyFy’s “Joe Rogan Questions Everything.”
Those of us with a working brain know this Disotell dude is part of the mainstream science cover-up. Ketchum clearly cracked this and they don't like it, because it goes against not only the status quo but also findings and knowledge they're keeping from the public. Conventional science is a closed system, they have a structured belief system where anything that doesn't fit within their already set belief system is simply rejected or hidden from us and ridiculed. That's precisely what happened to her, courtesy of players like Disotell, etc. Once you realize how we're being screwed over royally by these people, you either get angry and fight it or retire. I fight it, seems like she is too.
Delete"You can't prove something doesn't exist [ . . . ] you can't disprove this."
DeleteTodd Disotell
Skeptards hoisted by their own "skeptard."
Skeptards pricelessly self-pwned.
http://squatchit.com/
ReplyDeleteWitness one: I feed Bigfots at my ranch in Texas.
ReplyDeleteWitness Two: i saw a hot blonde guy somkin a fattie feeding squatches in Texas. I
ReplyDeleteWitness Three: I live in Wales and look at videos of that sane hot guy feeding squatches in Texas but I'm too driunk to start a Utube Channel.
ReplyDeleteSkeptic. You are all LIARs but that guy is hot.
ReplyDeletePaste King: I am all three witnesses.
ReplyDeleteExamine this logic and comment below
ReplyDeleteDude what are you smoking?
DeleteRobert Lindsay copied Joes comments. See Limdsays post. He even put in the (sigh)
DeleteI'm not smoking anything. It's a color commentary. You get the joke if you read Lindsay's posts and this one. If not. You just hit publish. Like u
DeleteGotta go. This Anons a none too brighter.
ReplyDeleteAs a person who specializes in and hired for moderating panel discussions, I totally disagree with the basic premise that his style is of any quality. In fact it is horrendous, as an interviewer. His questions are leading, and he supplants ideas and issues into the conversation and suggests, specifically, outcomes that the guy didn't necessarily want to admits or possibly think of.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, he does lead the witness down a path, that is apparently pre-determined, and is entertaining for believers. But his style is certainly not worthy to sway non-believers. This interviewer's value is only to hard core believers, and not to the general public. I give his interviewing skills a D. But entertainment skills and pandering to his audience a B+.
Agreed. Real witnesses tio startling events don't need so much prompting or cues. But he'll get better Thanks for that. Restores the faith.
Deletehe`s gotta real pretty mouth..
ReplyDeleteThere was a bf recently killed in Ontario Canada by a transport and no guys in black vans took it but some guys in rental trucks came and picked it up and it was small two guys picked it up and that's the last we seen of it!
ReplyDeleteAesthetic value of mouth not nearly as important as what it emits besides carbon. M
ReplyDeleteIf your referring to the one north of Uppsala I seen the same one, did u see how dark it's nose was? It looked like black leather, almost like a dogs nose or something hard to explain. I was wondering if u seen the size of its hands or the palms cause all I could see was fur covering the hands from its legs?
ReplyDeleteBigfoot doesn't exist.
ReplyDeleteDear Sweet anon, would you like me to buy you an advanced copy of "The Yeti Enigma". OR. Would you prefer to see one tonight. Your choice. One is cheaper. M
ReplyDeleteLOL. The yeti et al are just pretend dreams for losers.
DeleteLook. I got trailed through the Atoka and Lake Caddo area the whole time I was there. And it was only squirrel season.
ReplyDeleteWERE YOU A LAWYER ONCE?
DeleteThis is awesome. Please get this interviewer on Finding Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteI believe this ole boy, for what it's worth to all you shit talkers here. Ya'll don't know reality yer damn selfs. ya wouldn't know a damn bear from a bean, if you weren't told it by your handlers. A man what lives in the woods like thisun, he done seen sumfin. All ya'll shit talking on this good ole boy. ya ought not be a doing that, fuggers.
ReplyDeleteleave mike alone he broke his monkey last night.
ReplyDeleteGood interviewer??
ReplyDeleteConstantly stepping on the witness words-
Leading questions
"I mean I mean"
Telling his own story--please--worst interviewing ever!
Shawn, likes to post stuff he doesn't really believe just to get a reaction from people, he's the biggest troll on this site
DeleteWill someone please give this poor guy some bug spray?!
ReplyDelete