ParaBreakdown Classic: Bigfoot Near Mnt. St Helens


Here's a video that's been around for a while. A few things that tells us it's probably not a real Bigfoot are the arms and its stride -- they're both too short to be a squatch. Watch this enhance by Parabreakdown:



Comments

  1. Looks just like a guy in a suit. Reminicent of that old PGF.Remember when people actually thought PGF was a real bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The internet crazies still do - tragically.

      You will find them in the dark murky waters of the BFF.

      Their one and only argument is that it is real because no replication. Well that's a nice position for the footers to put themselves in knowing that any replication attempt they will state as failed because it is simply impossible to recreate a piece of film footage exactly. There are far to many factors involved, most of them unknown. Munns can't even decide on which lens or camera was used.

      Its a sad cult where they can sit there and say the pgf is real perpetually despite no bigfoot ever being found anywhere ever.

      It is really quite sad.

      Delete
    2. What is sad, is why are you even on this site, in the first place? Go away, go to an X-box site, play there.

      Delete
    3. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

      Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom!

      Troll Blast!

      Delete
    4. This looks like a good cgi or real bigfoot. no way a guy in a suit is going to be able to turn his head like that. idk

      Delete
    5. Yeah 9:49, at some points it looks massive, the back, lats, some huge character.

      Delete
  2. - Joe Fitzgerald

    "For the most part the samples he has tracked down for analysis have turned out to be known species such as bears; however two samples taken towards the end of his quest will "change our understanding of Bear history. Professor Sykes is a world authority on genetics and what he has to say about Bears will shock the world".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha brilliant.

      So these 2 samples turned out to be for this bear.

      No monkey is coming.

      Delete
    2. No monkey man. Just a BEAR. Like Joe has been told the whole time it's just a bear. The chances of a 8 foot 500lb bear undiscovered in the Russian wilderness is certainly plausible. The chances of a 8 foot 500lb magic monkey man abundant through out the US Russia and Asia undiscovered well . . . Sure signs of a mental disorder there.

      Delete
    3. The samples discussed last night won't have challenged our understanding of human history.

      That has still to come.

      Are we sitting uncomfortably?

      MMG

      Delete
    4. Are you saying the next show sykes is going to say "yes bigfoot exists"?

      Utter delusional dreamer.

      Delete
    5. Best case for footers will be Bigfoot once existed. But he will not. What he will say is the samples contained a new species of BEAR. Joe you have been smoked deal with it

      Delete
    6. No that is not what I'm saying.

      You obviously have problems comprehending what is going on around you.

      MMG

      Delete
  3. NO magic monkey. PGF = gigantic static diaper butt. All Meldrums track castings are fake as are Cliff B. Compliant gate = No such thing. No skunk ape. ONLY bears. Lots and Lots of bears. Hell the teddy bear is based on an actual bear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ relies on one sample to prove a point. What a dork. Do you find love on the Internet too? Sykes hasn't even looked at Bigfoot and this peon thinks he has smoked everyone. Moron -they save the best for last.

      Delete
    2. Anon 5:06 is the worlds most lonely guy. This is his life day in and day out. More dedicated than any footer. Posting endlessly . Every site has a village idiot and this is ours. Lol. Tard on mommas boy !

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bigfoot still won't exist no matter how many times you copy paste the same drivel.

      Delete
    2. Joe there's no giant ape man running around. Just bears. Time to seek some help for that mental disorder you have. Bigfoot fits into the same category as fairy's santa unicorns and other mythological creatures. Don't start with your native american bullshit either what do you know about native american's. Transcripts are only translated to the best of the translators knowledge. Also stories change every time they are told. What might have started as a fairy tail can turn into a full blown legend. You hear about native american's saying their fathers lived with the Sasquatch but they will tell you it was their fathers and it is a never ending chain reaction. You need to grow up and get a life Joe. Stop making yourself sound like a expert. You're not!!!!

      Delete
    3. Also hairy humans exist. There is your explanation for how the native americans know what hairy humans looked like. http://www.oddee.com/item_97812.aspx

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  5. Another lump of shit "opinion only" piece peddled as a "breakdown."

    Sloppy blogging.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joe assembled facts. Thorough and precise. Made no bold predictions. MMG correctky pointed out that there is something major brewing that doesn't appear to be ursine In nature. If I was a skeptic. And I often think like one. I would adopt a cautious "wait and see" approach. But in your fervent rabid desire to take down Joe based on the findings of part 1 of a documentary paralleling an as yet unpublished book and more importantly scientific peer reviewed journal. Don't you think you guys have celebrated more prematurely than a touchdown dance by an entire NFL team while the ref is trying to signal holding above the din of noise ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. For the record I think he's going to find DNA of an archaic human ancestor that is probably currently inhabiting our forests and definitely hanging about my family ranch. But like I said. That's just opinion and conjecture.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If he finds them I hope real researchers like Randles and Cutino have a plan in place to let academia and state legislatures move quickly to protect them from their greatest threat. Us.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You guys laugh at and provoke Melba and Todd Standinf but who else is preaching species protection? Smart people are. My group is. It is at the forefront of every discussion we have.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WHAT"S the name of your( "SMART PEOPLE) GROUP"?? no, no, dont tell us!!" THE TEXAS TWEAKERS!!. wooo whooo.... chop up a fat wife beater for us ..

      Delete
  10. So. All you skeptics keep denying it exists. The more you do. The more they remain undiscovered as you margianalize and fanatasize real witnesses and researchers alike. M

    ReplyDelete
  11. In other words...,.you keep laughing at us....and we will too. But we will wink and nod as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10:27 ^^^ textbook example of newly discovered Homo Ignoramus.

      #TooneyTard approved

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

Questions of the day: Something's not right about Patty, why are the soles of her feet white?