Breaking: Is This Proof That Dr. Bryan Sykes Has Proven Bigfoot?
Holy-Matt-Moneymaker-On-a-Pogostick! This latest news just hit our desk via Robert Lindsay. Apparently, there's a new book that's coming out that will "change our understanding of human history." Dr. Bryan Sykes has been collecting purported Bigfoot samples and it appears his study is nearing completion and a book about his endeavor will soon be released. According to the publisher, what Dr. Sykes say about Yetis "will shock the world". Wow! Here's an excerpt via TheBookSeller.com:
Bryan Sykes, professor of genetics at Oxford University, is to investigate whether there are genetic traces of species including the Yeti.
Mark Booth, publisher of Hodder & Stoughton’s Coronet imprint, has acquired world rights excluding America in the provisionally titled The Quest for the Yeti, A DNA Detective Story from agent Luigi Bonomi.
The Quest for the Yeti will describe Sykes' hunt for genetic traces of species whose existence remains scientifically unconfirmed, including the Yeti, the Sasquatch and Big Foot. For the most part the samples he has tracked down for analysis have turned out to be known species such as humans, bears or apes; however two samples taken towards the end of his quest will "change our understanding of human history," he says.
Previous books by Sykes include The Seven Daughters of Eve, which explored how we can track our genetic ancestors through time via a gene passed through the maternal line and was a Sunday Times and New York Times bestseller.
Bonomi said: "Professor Sykes is a world authority on genetics and what he has to say about Yetis will shock the world". Meanwhile Booth opined: "An author who is both world-leader in his subject, and can also tell a good story, is as rare as the Yeti".
Anti
ReplyDelete...that is a true anti-first...
DeleteFIRST BITCH
Delete^ anti got pwned
DeleteSykes is merely trying to steal FB's thunder. We all know they went to the Himilayas this season. Lindsay is reporting they have HD footage of turds actually flying out of a yeti's taterhole.
DeleteThe Quest for the Yeti? that's gotta hurt Lol
DeleteDavid Attenborough thinks Yetis are very likely real too or at least it's possible, perhaps already knowing so.
DeleteDid I get first?
ReplyDelete^not even close, does this deserve a great false first congrats? I'm not sure, it was such a scared attempt at a first...
DeleteDamn people are quick!
ReplyDeleteWay to go Uncle Bob!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteIt will take a body, all samples could come back as unknown and that still doesn't prove sasquatch exist
ReplyDeleteYet more bullshit. Utter fucking nothing from someone. It's so fun to call bigfooters stupid. It's like kicking a one-legged dog, though.
ReplyDeleteNot really. It's pretty clear not having an open mind makes you even more stupid. Stupid.
DeleteSince you have experience kicking one-legged dogs, that sums up your character.
DeleteSkeptards are flipping out because their two-headed religion of evolution and skepticism may be crushed under a certain professor's big foot.
Utter BS? Then what will be published? A gripping tale about workaday squirrel DNA? Without some kind of discovery, there would be nothing to publish.
Use the logic the JayFers are always pontificating their sorry drooping asses about.
The professor has surely found something, perhaps the "monkey."
Well said ^
DeleteIt doesn't kill evolution at all nor does it damage skepticism which is a healthy thing it just says Sykes has discovered something he believes is important. The thing that you're all missing here is they keep referring to the Yeti, not Bigfoot or Sasquatch maybe he found nothing in the US?
DeleteWow that's pretty weak. If Yeti is proven then Bigfoot is entirely plausible.
DeleteNot necessarily the yeti could be a evolved version of the Gigantopithecus which was known to have lived in china. Russia is a plausible country for the yeti or Gigantopithecus to have migrated to. The United states on the other hand yea its a slim possibility but unlikely.
DeleteAnd then we have the land/ice bridge from Russia to North America.
Delete...He didn't say otherwise, and it is not weak at all: He could have found something in the Asian samples and got only bear and burger king from Justin's boots and the other American samples....
Deletedo you know how dumb you sound? a bigfoot is going to cross the berring sea. Their not that dumb. thats certain death
Delete6:10 meant for 5:57....
DeleteTheres gaps in evolution,are you saying you totally disbelieve evolution yet believe in a human ape hybrid?
Delete6:14 before you start calling other people dumb, do you know how dumb you sound since humans did it and you have no fucking clue what Sasquatch are capable of?
DeleteI know what they're not capable of. Existing in a breeding population without leaving any evidence whatsoever.
DeleteRight, no evidence....
Deletehttp://www.angusadventures.com/adventurer-handbook/beringstrait/
DeleteRight so it has been done first time only just and 2nd was experienced people. so tell me what did the bigfoot eat for the 15 odd days it would have taken. also a creature 2 or 3 times the weight. Also wouldn't this mean you would have sasquatches washed up everywhere from the ones that didn't make it?
mebbe they rode on the boats with them fellers that catches them crabs
DeleteThey dont go to russia.
Deletemebbe you dont know wtf your talking about
DeleteBeringea was a land mass at least twice and maybe more times. It had Tundra or Taiga with flaura and fauna abundant enough for many species to cross and some did. No doubt.
DeleteCalm down folks.
DeleteSykes has said nothing yet.
Lindsay has read the same comments on other blogs that I have. Whilst the book may be 'surprising' it does not mean Sykes is claiming a positive in his findings.
Let's not jump the gun folks.
MMG
Yes it does you blind illiterate douchbag
Deletethe hope is if he has the smoking gun but as an early poster indicated, "surprising" results to the scientific community is anything that doesn't confirm the status quo. So gap between status quo and smoking gun is huge.
DeleteAnother bullseye for Robert "Sniper" Lindsay!
ReplyDeletenot yeti
DeleteRobert, It's not easy to pat yourself on your back is it? Unfortunately, you have been wrong about just about everything. You still are living in denial of your biggest screwup, Rick Dyer, as you still believe that he somehow has a body somewhere. So how many people did you ban from your website, for disagreeing with you on Dyer? Loads! And they were right all along.
DeleteHave you been to the circus show over at the JREF? Everything's falling apart over there.
ReplyDeleteThey're claiming this is publicist hype, and the fact that he's releasing a book (ignoring the part where he plans to release it on a journal too), makes it a scam.
Bunch of toons over there.
Toons?
DeleteWell they aren't the ones claiming magic monkeys are running all around america leaving Mcdonalds toys out for crazy cat women to find.
Smoked by 17,5000
That's a pwning.
DeleteAnd you call the idiot believers here...
Delete5:04 do you have any other chestnuts of your delusionisms to impart to us lowlies here at BEB today?
Delete#Tooneytard totally invested in the monkey Not Existing At All Costs.
The monkey must not exist!!!
How weird.
I didn't get that gene.
If there are rumours about a new type of tortoise, I do not get entrenched and invested in absolutely that tortoise not existing. It's okay with me if the tortoise exists or doesn't.
This zealot-hollering obsessiveness turning evolution and sceptism into a religion is doing you great damage, personally, professionally, and publicly.
Get neutral. Let the 'monkey' exist if it exists. Relax. Let evolution change or be disproven if that is the case. Let it happen.
Every time you blow you stack you reveal to everyone reading the blog that you regard scepticism and evolution as a religion. It shows you up as unstable and unable.
The hypocrisy is overwhelming. Logic and science: if a top genetic scientist is about to disagree with your decades-entrenched beliefs, why dig in even harder and resist?
The skeptards' cry is science and logic, science and logic, science and logic; you are about to be treated to some science and logic you might not like. You will then, based illogically on your dislike, reject it? That is not scientific nor logical. It's hypocrisy. You are cherry picking the science and scientists you want, and you are cherry picking from their findings what you want and reject.
You are violating your own credo, daily, day in and day out, for bloody decades.
Nobody's rejecting nothing, dork.
DeleteWhy all the emphasis on yeti?
Because no bigfoot?
Because all the footers are wrong?
^^^ Tangible fear
DeleteMMG
MMG, if Sasquatch is proven to actually exist, why do you think that a skeptic should fear it? Just curious.
Delete^^^ Not bad for a clone!
DeleteAre you seriously asking why skeptards would be less than impressed with a Sykes positive?
For some it would be truly Armageddon. Others however will have to study up on ghosts and troll those sites.
Red alert at Jref!
MMG
;-)
Delete^^^I'll tell you why skeptics fear it. They fear being utterly wrong. The skeptards on this site spend way too much time trolling a topic they don't believe in. If they are proven wrong it will upset their obsessive and very delicate egos.
DeleteAwwww.
DeleteActually it dose. From DNA you can tell exactly what a animals make up is. Right own to eye colour. You can even tell how old the sample is. Take a human sample undertaking forensic testing. They can tell you everything from how old the sample is right down to what the person looks like.
ReplyDeleteFooters are really building this up like they did with ketchum and the community got absolutely smoked because of it.
ReplyDeleteI would suggest you footers stop proclaiming sykes has found the magic monkey man before he has even released any results.
Believe me its not going to work out in the footers favour.
I believe you.
DeleteDon't worry. Erikson has HD footage that will prove the existence of sasquatch once and for all.
DeleteWe've always got Sasfooty's steamy loaf if that doesn't pan out.
Delete..That turd cost me 5 grand...I had to pay off all my losing "Bigfoot does not exist" bets....
DeleteWe all know Ketchum cracked it only the mystery ape community suffered and tried to block, and of course those in authority opposing it with their media helpers.
Delete"Its highly unlikely that we will find a new species" - bryan sykes
ReplyDeleteThats a smoking folks.
He must have said that before he undertook the study.
DeleteNow two samples apparently have changed the arrangement of the pieces on the genetic chessboard.
It's no smoking.
I use a sock
DeleteScreaming girl here!! Is this what its like in the mens locker room?
DeleteMmmm screaming girls.
DeleteDr. Sykes did say it was unlikely he would find a new specie at the start of the project. However he also said that at the start of most of his advanced undertakings he does not expect much to come of it only to be blown away from his findings in the end. Just maybe he hit the jackpot again.
DeleteTake a sentence out of a whole paragraph and the meaning is changed dramatically. Who got smoked now.
Chuck
You did Alpo dog
DeleteNope, you did 6:49
Delete6:51 will now enlighten us as to what unexpected results Sykes has uncovered and from which studies they came from.
DeleteI remember Alpha Dog paying his $30 to Melba and defending that study on here then he got sick of it and turned tail and left till Joe turned this place into believeer troll central
DeleteNever paid 30 for the study, as I am clueless as to DNA jargon as is everyone else that comes to this blog. I will get it for free though. I also predicted over 2 1/2 years ago that no journal would pick it up and it would have to be self published just because of what the study represents.
DeleteChuck
No. No you can't.
ReplyDeleteLook, if he has a sample with decent provenance from the Himalayas and he finds that the donor is, say, a primate that split from us 4 million years ago, what the else would we call it beside a yeti?..Well, as someone here once told me it could be one of those little snow monkeys..lol...don't know much about this stuff to be honest....
ReplyDeletes\b "... what the hell else would we call it...."
ReplyDeleteIf it comes back saying the sample is 4 million years old it will tell us that they once existed and that their is still no evidence that they still exist. They will be ably to tell if it is one of those snow monkeys.
ReplyDeleteAnother big juicy turd burger served up hot and fresh to the Bigfoot community. PJ will need a few extra napkins for this one.
ReplyDeleteAnd you'll be eating your own turds soon enough turd boy.
Delete5:27, nicely pwned sir
Delete5:33...Nah, I've been in this game long enough to know that if it smells like shit, it's probably another "build up" about "definitive proof" of Sasquatch coming your way. If you're newbie, then I'll give you a quick lesson:
DeleteYou'll get nothing and like it.
If you've been around awhile, well then, you might be mentally retarded. If it's the latter, my apologies.
YGNALI
^LOL keep patting yourself on the back there turd boy.
DeleteLOL @ turd boy.
5:41 you're a nobody on the Internet, so just shut the fuck up.
DeleteHey 6:10, you'll get nothing and like it.
Delete^LOL @ turd boy.
DeleteLet this jackass footer bray and howl. He's just going to end up with his dreams smashed against the rocks.
DeleteHe's like 0-5000 over the last 45 years. His whole life has been one colossal failed fantasy.
Give him this brief moment.
LOL @ turd boy.
Delete^ ate the Sykes turd burger with extra onions
DeleteLOL @ turd boy.
DeleteDidn't work for Ketchum, won't work for Sykes.
ReplyDeleteNot that the sample is 4 million years old, but that the donor is a primate that split from us 4 million years ago...something like that....
ReplyDeleteThere is one person who mentioned type specimen. That's correct. Audubon would roll in his grave. Lets say you knew where they were What would you be prepared to do ?
ReplyDeleteUm...kill that sumbitch?
DeleteProtect my taterhole at all cost and apologize to PJ for not believing.
DeletePull up the drawbridge and kick all of you drag queens out of the castle.
Deletemike are you a lawyer
DeleteAll you sasquatch believers...keep on drooling. It's all you dumbfucks can do. And you do it well. Ape in the woods, yeah right.
ReplyDelete^Hey, you're ignorant ass has managed to exist long enough to learn how to type a sentence on the computer. Anything is possible.
Delete^ *Your
DeleteSchooled.
"Your" ignorant ass.
Delete^ Late to the game.
Deletelol..dude that's harsh..What about apes in the snow? This post is about the yeti.....
Delete5:40's customary Retard Rage is hard to watch sometimes. You know, the impotent pointless screeching, the banging of the skull on the floor, the pulling of hair, the writhings and foaming at the mouth, the compulsive self-touching in inappropriate ways.
DeleteDoctor, we need a crash helmet and a bib for Inmate Number 5:40. And hurry.
It would be fun to find out which of these posts are by Sharon Shill, Carl Zimmer, and JREFers in general who bleeve they are on a little science mission field trip by attempting to Take Action on bigfoot sites.
Ooh, how effective it's been, what? All they can do now is resort to obscenity-ridden immature tantrums.
Poor devils.
Listen Jizzum,you've yet to prove them wrong so you should probably shut your pie hole til something solid is out,too many false starts already
DeleteI wonder how many times a day 6:13 reads the JREF page and screams at his monitor "BIGFOOT IS REAL YOU DUMBASSES'.
DeleteI bet his neighbors get a real kick out of that.
Is that the same dude who goes back on all the posts hours later and gets the last word?
DeleteWhat a horses patoot
No..That is "paranoid guy"...The one who thinks all the trolls are black ops people trying to discredit Ketchum in particular and footery in general...
DeleteYeah I thought we'd got rid of posters like him and then Joe and his band of believer trolls came along and sucked the fun from the comments section, oh joy
DeleteExcept his is a bigfoot forum so yah, fuck off.
Delete"What a horses patoot"
DeleteOk gramps.
Yes DNA will tell us this. Ketchum's samples were contaminated which means they were worthless. Sykes would have stopped this study if these results were contaminated. There is no reason for him to risk his credibility.
ReplyDelete..Totally agree..He won't tarnish his legacy for a few bigfoot bucks....
ReplyDeleteAll I read was drool, fuck and wood. Sounds like someone wants a date.
ReplyDelete??????
DeleteKetchum publishing a paper on her own personal website stating that she had found a unknown genome along with known homosapien genome has tarnished her credibility beyond repair. Sykes would have seen this and wouldn't risk it. I am guessing Sykes will send his samples to another credible geneticist to back up his results.
ReplyDeleteProbably..he might also pass his paper around to a few trusted colleagues for comment before it comes out..They write "not for circulation" on it or label it a "pre-print" when they do that...
ReplyDeleteI would say they would test at least one sample to see if they replicate the result for that sample.
ReplyDeleteMakes sense...I would bet on that...
ReplyDeleteNew drinnking game: Every time Munns posts the word science everyone does a shot.
ReplyDeleteEvery time Munns melts down at the slightest criticism its bottoms up time for everyone.
Sounds lame.
Delete#TooneyTard approved^ 6:18
Deletecuckoo . . . cuckoo . . . cuckoo
You lost me at "bottoms up time for everyone" ^^^
DeleteThe JREFers are hysterical over this, my God, calm down. It's proof they've turned skepticism into a religion. It was pointless from the get-go. They are constantly, daily, trying to fit conclusions to tests, science, results. Now Disotell is accused of this too.
ReplyDeleteIt's funny because this is exactly what the raging skeptards have repeatedly accused everyone else of doing. They strut their laughable butts around spouting off about Occam's Razor and other cherished theories, while they themselves are constantly literally constantly failing their own standards and claims.
Hypocrisy.
Hypocrites by the bloody score.
lol....I think you posted under the wrong thread..it happens
ReplyDelete^ like we haven't heard this 1000 times before
ReplyDeleteWe win because Robert Lindsay says so?
God you people are frightfully dim.
WELCOME BACK MY FRIENDS TO SHOW THAT NEVER ENDS WE'RE SO GLAD YOU COULD ATTEND COME INSIDE,COME INSIDE
ReplyDeleteCaps guy has spoken.
DeleteNope thst's Rum him and Rushforlife used to be regulars and are kinda missed as they're a rarity being believers with a sense of humour, bad music taste and don't act like butthurt kids if someone says "Got Monkey?"
Delete..lol..Did you post under the wrong thread too? This has nothing to do with Lindsay--its just speculation based on the publishers release...
ReplyDeleteyou've cross-checked Lindsay then? Or do you naturally believe everything he posts?
ReplyDelete6:35 Hi Robert
ReplyDeleteNo, I didn't to be honest...I remember that today on this blog someone anonymously mentioned this..Not exactly rock solid..lol...
ReplyDeleteWow. This forum is full of retards who believe in bigfoot and the yeti. Fucking re-tards!
ReplyDelete^sharon h tell it true
DeleteYou are here aren't you? :0
DeleteWow, this forum is full of skeptard zealots.
DeleteThere's one at 6:57.
Get the camera!!!
Hey Luigi! You gotta de spaghetti sauce ina da DNA!
ReplyDeleteWattsamattayou?
So, two samples are going to shock the world? That could mean anything. Seriously, I'm an 80% believer, but that doesn't sound hopeful to me. Shocking the world could mean some kind of non-squatch evolutionary discovery. If sykes says no bigfoot, I officially am done with all things squatchy.
ReplyDeleteI know for a FACT that one of the samples tested positive for DNA shared by the Great Horned Starchild Skull.
DeleteI think you have confused the horns of the Star Child with the horns of the Jackalope.
DeleteWhich one was in Kiss?
DeleteI'm staying cautiously optimistic on this one
DeleteNeal
Me too.
DeleteBob
WhatsamattaU is Bullwinkle's alma mater...its whassamatta for you?
ReplyDeleteUpdate: new reality show about Skunk Ape with Dave Shealy tonight at 10:30pm on The Discovery Channel.
ReplyDeleteWolf
Beaking: Is This Proof That Dr. Bryan Sykes Has Proven BigBird?
ReplyDeleteBoth JREF scoftics and Karl Rose at cz.com have called a CODE RED! All paid scoftics have been ordered to Bigfoot Evidence, to flood that board with the cut and paste disinformation propoganda out of their computer database. Nobody is going to get any sleep tonight. They have cleaned off the benches. Even the supervisors have logged in are are attempting to neutralize the latest Sykes news. And this is all just a warmup for the actual release of the Sykes Report, coming soon to a theater near you. You just can't make this stuff up.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of the JREFers:
DeleteSCHEDULE OF SKEPFOOLERY
Mission Plan:
1. Attempt to preempt/short-circuit Sykes study publication by tailoring a tin foil hat for the doctor's head and continuing the smear campaign.
2. If the Sykes results show only known animals, hurriedly withdraw the tin foil hats and smear campaign and embrace Sykes.
3. Claim that neutral findings of known animals prove a negative, that bigfoot doesn't exist. (Please enjoy this fantasy.)
4. If the Sykes study reveals the existence of an unidentified (hitherto by DNA) hominin, switch gears, ignore it, and attack the PGF, and claim that Patty is not one of these unknown creatures discovered by Sykes. (This must be done at all costs.)
5. If the Sykes study reveals the existence of an unknown hominin, redouble your efforts in attempting to fit the doctor with a tin foil hat. (This is imperative.)
6. If more clear footage, especially if linked with DNA per Sykes, comes to light of a creature appearing obviously to be of the same species as Patty, with the huge buttocks, enormous arm length, and the other matching details, though you will now have to accept the existence of the creatures, you must continue to attack and berate the PGF and all of those connected to it and decry it as fake, despite the mountain of evidence standing before you. (This is also imperative.)
7. To be clear, if bigfoot is proven to exist with another film in conjunction with DNA, no matter how precisely the creature filmed matches Patty, you must continue to proclaim the PGF a fake. This is our battle cry, and our main talking point.
We'll be seeing you on the usual skeptoid sites and forums.
We wish you good luck.
Lol!
DeleteMMG
We've seen this before, with the Ketchum paper, the so-called body -reveal with Dyer, Daisy in a box. Sykes is a reputable world class scientist, which others are not--including Ketchum--but even he must survive peer review. While his data may be revealing, it won't be the bizarre peyote tale told by Ms Melba.
ReplyDeleteAll these anons too pussified to use monikers or real names.
ReplyDeleteYou-tell-em-anon!
DeleteGood one 8:35. These affronted anons attacking others for being anons reminds me of skeptardical hypocrisy.
DeletePreach on brother anon! Only pussies don't use their real name!
DeleteTURTLES!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteEven an anon!
DeleteEver an Anon!
DeletePONIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SWAMP EELS!!!!!!!!!!!!DON'T FORGET THE SWAMP EELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteANONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!TROLLANDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteThis is Ketchum fever de ja vu on here again. A little tit bit from a guy who likes girls with little tits (don't forget that good old Robert likes em real young) and every Believer is going batshit crazy. Do you ever learn?? Seriously?? No one has officially released anything yet, the paper hasn't been released, the book obviously not been released, the BBC documentary not shown and Sykes not made any official statements and yet you already put 2+2 together and make 5. It's Ketchum fever all over again complete with the Believer Skeptard troll and countless "We're right you were wrong" comments with nothing to back it up yet just rumours from a press release and some comments Ro made on a podcast! How's about you all grow up, relax and wait and see like rational people?? How do you know that he hasn't just discovered some new species of Himalyan bear like the Nazis shot in the '30s? How do you know that what ever he has found and the conclusions he's come to will pass a peer review? You can write a book and come to any conclusions you like but a scientific paper is different and untill Sykes speaks out or publishes you have nothing concrete! Not that you care of course, cue crazy anti-interlectual, anti-logic, anti-science based rant about you knowing everything and anyone who questions Sasquatch is obviously retarded and an idiot because they don't believe blah, blah, PGF, blah, blah, Ketchum, blah, blah, Russian jumping Bigfoot, blah, blah, Skeptard, blah, blah, Arsewinker.... You get the idea
ReplyDeleteWrite an essay why don't you. Yawn.
Delete8:34, Sharon Shill, is that you?
DeleteYou were almost right:
"cue crazy anti-interlectual, anti-logic, anti-science based rant about you knowing everything and anyone who" believes in bigfoot is retarded and an idiot.
You almost had it. Actually you were 180 degrees out from the truth:
It has been the Raging Skeptards who have constantly consistently accused enthusiasts of retardation and of being illogical, unscientific, and the JREF fav vocab gem, delusional.
What are you upset about? You should be happy!!! Enthusiasts are interested in what one of the premiere genetic scientists on Earth has to say on the samples he tested!!! That sounds to me like they are showing some interest in and respect for science, logic, and it shows a distinct absence of delusion!!!
Wake up and be happy for Judas' sake, come on!!!
Your hypocrisy is UNACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh, and did you actually intend to write "interlectual", or were you trying to be condescending? Here's news for you:
You are in no position from which to condescend.
You and JREFers are dropping the ball. Go away and deal with it. Enthusiasts here are interested in reports, legends, stories, and also science and DNA.
They aren't interested in your hysterical freakout claims of Science and Logic and your love for the word delusional.
Go back to your worship of your perverted created delusional religion of SkeptoScience.
Well done you just proved everything I said earlier to be completely correct.
DeleteHey, losers, Sharon H. has better things to do than troll this site. Do you really think your nitwit bander would interest her, that she would be awed by the sheer force of your intellectual arguments?
DeleteAs for me, I still love Sharon H., even though she tossed me aside like a rotten watermelon. I feel cheap and used...and I kind of like it. :)
Is there such a thing as an interlicktual?
DeleteAmen brother, you da man!
ReplyDeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK...
ReplyDelete; )
Peace.
WAZZZ UP JOE!!!!
DeletePEACE.
I'm just trying to come to grips with someone typing tick tock over, and over, and over...and then leaving a little winky face. The guy's nuts!! Grab 'em!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteNice to see some one with a brain and some good old fashioned common sense on here rDR
ReplyDeleteThis vindicates Melba you tards!
ReplyDeleteProof that it's been proven?
ReplyDeleteBut where is the proof there is proof it's been proven?
Which leads to the inevitable question... where is the proof of proof that there's proof it's been proven?
Proof that it's been proven?
ReplyDeleteBut where is the proof there is proof it's been proven?
Which leads to the inevitable question... where is the proof of proof that there's proof it's been proven?
Proof is in the pudding.
DeleteOr in my pants. Specifically, in my right pocket.
DeleteJoe is a butt wipe.
ReplyDeleteAnd you're the dingleberry that's getting wiped!
DeletePwned!
Sykes has most likely found something ground breaking. But why does it have to cryptid related? The press release mentions "human history". As mentioned by someone else on a different forum, perhaps he found something like evidence of European DNA in North America 10,000 years ago or something. That would certainly rewrite human history and have nothing to do with magic monkeys.
ReplyDeleteBigfoot apparently claim that they have been here since the dinosaurs, so I would expect Sykes to come up with some older dates for branches or hybrids to have occurred.
DeleteAgreed, there's a lot of room between "surprising results" and a smoking gun.
Deletethere real ive seen em. theres something on the hill
ReplyDeleteIt is stunk ape body we need alive or dead. No body no stunk ape.
ReplyDeleteUncle Buck
Kentucky
Indeed it does. Her samples also weren't contaminated but showing human, which is why they confused the lab guys looking at is. Just like Patty confuses some people expecting some ape animal thing, which this species obviously is not.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Sykes found the unknown side of the DNA, that Ketchum didn't find she found the species' human part.
ReplyDeleteam I the only one who thinks Dr Sykes looks kind of like David Gilmour?
ReplyDeleteHello, gang. This is Robert Lindsay. I'm still relevant. Even if I'm a lying sack of scat. Woo Woo! Look at me!
ReplyDeleteSykes will not prove anything. Melba's study is the only legit DNA study. Alex MW
ReplyDeleteTrue. A man of Sykes' status is only doing this still because he does seem to know these things really are out there and basically knows she's got it, so eventually we might see them working along side each other rather than oppose the other. Maybe have Attenborough onboard.
DeleteIn other words, Ketchum did solve this Sasquatch mystery, or part of it anyway, he knows that too and will likely swipe all these hangers-on (like BFRO theology) off.