Friday, September 6, 2013

Watch: The Bigfoot Hunting Blind Theory


Author D.L. Soucy has encountered dozens of these strange stick structures during his expeditions. In the following video, Soucy discusses some structures he found and wonders if Bigfoot could be utilizing the huts for hunting. He writes:

I have come across hundreds, maybe thousands of odd looking stick structures while hiking through the woods. Better than 99% of them are totally natural by design, but there have been a few that I just could not explain away to totally natural causes.

In this video I return to what I call Blind #1 at the West Oxford site. I'll look at the structure again, which is composed of one massive superstructure that was a natural fall, as well as there being several limbs piled along its length with a few that do not seem to come from the immediate area. My guess is that these limbs were added to the structure to improve its concealment ability.

The structure is within sight of a game trail leading to a pond. A person sitting inside of this structure would be totally concealed from any animal coming along the trail. It is big enough for two people to sit inside, or one really huge person.

Did a Bigfoot build this structure for use as a hunting blind? Beats me. I cannot say that this is absolutely the case, since I cannot even prove Bigfoot exists, but the potential is there. As always, I am just sharing my observations, and you are free to make up your own mind, one way or the other.



120 comments:

  1. 100% are natural or made by humans.

    This pwns joe greatly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Definitely bigfoot. Humans never use hunting blinds. Or any kind of cover to ambush prey.
    Any stick structures that are found in the wild are from the over population of the bigfoot people.
    Tens of thousands of eye-witness sightings go unreported you know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some nice sarcasm +1


      These footers are silly aren't they?

      Delete
    2. Yes many certainly are.
      However I think it is possible for these things to exist it's just that some of the alleged evidence really can be explained with common sense.
      Anyone who goes into the forest looking for bigfoot sign will ALWAYS find some sort of evidence that could potentially be from a Sasquatch.
      Youtube is full of these "researchers" and mostly hoaxers.

      Delete
    3. The only way these things could exist is if 99.9% of the sighting reports are BS.

      They would have to be a species isolated in the PNW many hundreds of miles from anywhere that humans venture. Seen maybe once or twice in a decade.

      The current footery lore that has these creatures placed over the entire USA even where there is no viable habitat is ridiculous.

      Your not gona find a bigfoot in florida. That you can be sure of. In fact its more than likely that this species does not even exist based on the fact there is zero evidence and zero acceptance by real scientists.

      Delete
    4. Another point being if there is as many over such a wide range there would be no reason to denie its existance. being hundreds of thousands of sighting every year. There is no way a animal of this size can be elusive as it is given credit for

      Delete
    5. Mja, the massive number of reports does footers no favours. What that really shows is we are dealing with a cultural/human psychological issue rather than an actual real creature.

      Delete
    6. I think its more a want for him to exist so say he dose. Me personaly would love for him to but i dont think so. If i can get proven wrong then so be it.

      Delete
  3. No you. Who do you think the author you idiot

    ReplyDelete
  4. Real bigfoot :D

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD4aRmA8XOc

    ReplyDelete
  5. There expedient Meth labs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's how Bigfoot is so elusive he smokes meth and is always on the run the tree knocks are only heard when a person is nearby and it's them disassembling it to move away

      Delete
    2. I see it now it's all coming together nicely.

      Delete
    3. Two knocks red p lab. One knock shake n bake. Mornin Harry. Which in Texas means good afternoon. :)

      Delete
    4. Do lots of method stay up late paranoid behind blind..

      Delete
    5. ...."I feel like everydays the same and I'm left to discover my own....."

      Delete
    6. Hey good evening mike lol here that means it's dark what's the good word buddy

      Delete
  6. Joe not around today?

    Most have taken a heavy beating yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or many some people have a life outside of this blog unlike you waste of space trolls

      Delete
    2. And anon 3.20 is a gutless waste of space

      Delete
    3. Mja is likely a new persona from the person who made up joes persona.

      This guy has had many personas over the years including timmy, (ken), that happy lawns guy, eva, and many more.

      Delete
    4. Eye witness accounts are the most we can hope for until someone gets lucky and produces a body, DNA, or a film of unimpeachable quality.

      Delete
    5. Well considering they are all beleivers and im a skeptic tells the story. Your just a idiot trying to seek attention. Go back to class little boy

      Delete
    6. Anon 4:36, interesting theory. So any idea who this person is? But doesn't Eva really exist? Is she really a man pretending to be a man who wants to become a woman because she was a woman born inside a mans body?

      Delete
    7. Anon 4.36 it just a time wasting troll trying to attention seek. He has no clue what hes talking about and changes his identity every time joe schools him or he gets proven wrong. He is just a little boy that needs to grow up

      Delete
    8. Oh thank god. The thought of my hero worship fantsies being invalidated would have been too much to bear an a friday.

      Delete
    9. You can see intelligence and personality through posts. You can see a clear diffrence between us but anon posts 75% are 1 person

      Delete
    10. Travis
      The trolls seem to be hot for anyone thats not anon. I see there is a guy that follows mike

      Delete
    11. Joe's getting schooled in middle school today. Summer is over.

      Delete
    12. You're giving yourself away mj, you're obviously too familiar with this blog to be the noob you pretend to be. Time to do a ken and fake your own death

      Delete
    13. Wel considering i have olny had net connected about a week now and have oppions no ones heard before yea im some one else. How about you fuck off out of here troll

      Delete
    14. I do have the feeling I'm being watched......I am how you say......paranoi.......

      Delete
    15. Hey mike
      Every where we seem to go the same trolls pop up and say the same things every day. Their like spam

      Delete
    16. MJA my brother. There is no doubt. I'm acting like Danny McBride these days. Just keeping a boom box in my ear playing "Candlebox!" :)

      Delete
    17. Good way to ignore most the shit posted on here. It seems more like world war 3 the last few days

      Delete
    18. It's actually the zombie apocalypse. I missed some of it watching Showtime. But when I realized it was on I killed my neighbor for his wood stove. :)

      Delete
    19. I think your will find its the troll apocalypse. Must be time to launch a full blowen attack

      Delete
    20. I'm always available. And u know what. I have a good serious question for Joe that'll start the whole thing going. You talk about doing whippets at the prom party. It'll be on!!!! Pardon me. Mr Fitzgerald. May I ask a simple question ???

      Delete
    21. I have to admit once joe starts its quite funny.

      Delete
  7. Boring.

    Lets deal with the pgf.

    Problems footers have to ignore:

    Trackway film inconsistencies.

    Impossible film processing timeline.

    Obvious suit flaws displayed on film such as turtle shell diaper butt, gun turret top half turn, static breasts that are hairy, conical head that is an attribute to only male primates.

    Patterson being a con man.

    Patterson promoting bigfoot for years prior and releasing a book with a picture resembling patty prior.

    Patterson making up a story of a huge bigfoot lifting him up in his truck.

    Patterson using an imposter gimlin on his money making tour.

    His wife to this day cashing in on the film.

    Investigators such as long who actualy have done the research talked to the locals and found it was a hoax.

    Lack of detail in the film that can be used to support theories such as muscle movement. We can say just as easily suit buldges.

    Patty being human height as proved when a human walked the same path and overlaying the photo.

    Footprint depth deeper than a horses + human.

    Suit wearer confession.

    Diaper butt seen in identical gemora suit from that era.

    No bigfoot found before or since the film.

    Patty standing still at the start like someone waiting in a suit for the director to say action.

    Patty stumbling at the start. Certainly not an animal that is "effective within its environment".

    Think that should just about cover it.

    Your welcome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really like that assessment. Nice neat and concise. Yep you have covered it all. Can you give us a similar assessment for the Leaping Russian Yeti video? I tried to put that one to rest yesterday and failed miserably. Give it a shot Please.

      Delete
    2. I myself find floors to do with this film. The yeti on the other hand cannot be explained. Trying to call it a fox it a insult to all the skeptics intelligence

      Delete
    3. Trying to call it a yeti sounds even worse. The yeti is the creature of the himilayas. The Russians have a different name for their creature.

      Delete
    4. Lots of points there. All of which have dealt with accordingly.

      You must be new here or either you have the attention span of a gnat.

      MMG

      Delete
    5. That may be the case but the himilayas has no ocean between it and russia. The name dose not realy matter just call it russian bigfoot.

      Delete
    6. Dealt with?

      Lol.

      What a tooner.

      Not in the real world buddy.

      Delete
    7. Now do god and religion, you ignorant troll.

      Delete
    8. No god exists. No evidence to day god exists. The notion is silly.

      Religions are all nonsense.

      Next.

      Delete
    9. Anon 7.51
      Explain sprits and paranormal activity then

      Delete
    10. Ok.

      Like bigfoot there is not a single piece of verifiable evidence of spirits or any paranormal activity. This is especially more of a problem now with all the security cameras everywhere. Still nothing.

      Next.

      Delete
    11. Sprits and paranormal activity.
      To start with come to new zealand and i will take you places that will prove it. To start with maori cheifs are buried in a special cematery called a urupa. Legend has it that if not blessed properly the sprit will attack the mind of people who step foot in the urupa. I no of a case where a tourest did not beleive it and tested the theory now it is mad sits in corners of rooms and has not spoken a word since.

      Delete
    12. Do some reasearch before you say no evidence. I have personaly seen sprits and no many people who have with recorded evidence and photograpic evidence quite easily accesible

      Delete
    13. MJA are you really a resident of New Zealand? J.D.

      Delete
    14. O.k. To the skeptic of religion. I have no opinion on that subject. But you sound really passionate about the subject. Why don't you go to the boarder area between Afganistan and Pakistan and see if you can convince some of the locals. I'm pretty sure they would behead you.

      Delete
    15. Hey J.D.
      Yes i am. Currently living in rotorua in the north island

      Delete
    16. Skeptic. Try talking to a native american or a new zealand maori elder or a australian abo. See how you look after they prove sprits to you

      Delete
    17. Hi MJA, I used to chat with a guy down there that is a superb artist. His name is Terry Scott of Timbery wood turning. He and I exchanged some different wood species from our regions. He sent me some Black Mair and some ancient Kauri. Seems as though everything is quite rare down there or protected anyways. I guess NZ was heavily logged in the past. It was a few years ago right around the time of the big earthquake. He was telling me the economy was pretty depressed as was ours here in the US. By the way that was me that suggested the fox as an explanation for the leaping yeti. Is that what I think it really is in the film? No. But neither do I believe it has anything to do with a biped roaming around Russia. The film is so distant and fleeting really nothing can be decerned enought to come to any kind of conclusion. On the PGF subject. Originally as a kid I liked it and thought it was a bigfoot. Once it started being slowed down and enhanced I saw stuff that leads me to think it is not a bigfoot. Once I read the backstory I felt like a gullible fool. But that is just my opinion and I could see how others would be convinced by the footage. While I'm skepticle of bigfoots existance never would I try to tell someone what they did and did not see. So I'm on the fence and it is more uncomfortable than being on a definite side either way because all of the little debates and pros and cons for and against bigfoots existance well those richochet back and forth off of the interior of my hollow head. J.D.

      Delete
    18. Hey J.D.
      My view is exactly the same i dont see enough evidence either way. Patty yes i think pattys fake though. The yeti well i cant see any thing else. Was that kauri the giant kauri if it was its extremely rare it was logged to extintion not its olny found in swamps. We have many native hardwoods that are very nice looking woods. My favorite is the rimu and lancewood. Now that native trees are protected they are starting to come back to the way they were. And our economy follows u.s patterns quite well.

      Delete
    19. Anon 5:13...

      Let's deal with another comment-bold skeptard who doesn't know what they're on about... Shall we?

      Stuff skeptics make up in their heads to cope with Patty...

      Trackway film inconsistencies - yeah, by the timeline that you maintain is real, though you are merely relying on hearsay, rumour and desperation. No hard facts - coping mechanism.

      Film processing timeline - Well according to the timeline you maintain is accurate, on the Friday...

      "Patterson and Gimlin leave Bluff Creek and drive to Eureka, CA, to send the film via airplane to Yakima, WA, to be processed."

      This would give ample time for the film to be processed. If the processing machine in Yakima was already running there would have been no need to "fire it up" on Saturday. Possibly DeAtely had an arrangement with this "friend" to develop any film Roger came up with "under the table".

      "turtle shell diaper butt, gun turret top half turn, static breasts that are hairy, conical head that is an attribute to only male primates."

      These are all things that are not even there. And you people claim we do the exact same thing? Hypocrites. There is slight cheek movement in the arss, the gun turret half turn is not there, again; BS... and the breasts move ever so slightly, and as for the conical head; well we are not talking about your average ape here... we may not be talking about an ape at all.

      Patterson being a con man - lies, rumors and hearsay, BS... no facts.

      Patterson having an interest in Bigfoot years before tracking them is a natural progression that occurs with 80% of researchers... One that takes them out of the libraries and into the wilderness. Also, there have been many female Bigfoot sightings since Patty, you will not hear you people shout hoax because firstly you don't know enough about the subject and secondly, female Sasquatch sightings account for a high percentage of accounts and have been reported countless times since 1967; does this mean all these sightings are hoaxed because there was a female Sasquatch filmed prior; NO! The fact that Patterson copied an illustration of what 'appears' to be a female Bigfoot and then was successful in capturing one on footage, is a dot-to-dot that you people have made in a desperate attempt to find holes in the story.

      If his wife receives any money regarding this film, then as a widow that was made so very prematurely, that comforts me... her husband filmed one of the most remarkable things ever, and deserves that money; whilst bringing that up has absolutely nothing to do with the actual footage and is pointless (duh?)

      What locals maintain Patty is a hoax? People like Bob H? People who are trying to make a little money and fame for themselves?? People, who are the same as 90% of the population on this planet, that are naturally skeptical of this subject... Yeah, great sources of evidence.

      Delete
    20. There is more than enough detail in the film to see exactly what is there; an organic creature that cannot be replicated with technological achievements 46 years later. It makes me laugh when people make this statement, because I can see detail, Bill Munns can see detail and the millions who support the footage can see detail... Except the people who are clutching at straws to find something other than explaining the 'suit'.

      Even if Patty was proven to be human height, which is near enough impossible due to the lens, then we have Sasquatch that are human height... This might be news to you, but people report a lot of Sasquatch sightings as around the 6.5 foot mark.

      How do you know that the Bigfoot wasn't heavier than the horse Patterson was riding? Wow, you are on a real roll with this logic of yours and you also appear to be quite pleased with yourself... (Sigh). Again, assumptions and versions - coping mechanism.

      Suit wearer confession? A short list of just some Bob Heironimus' contradictions:

      Did you feel comfortable and natural walking in the suit?; Oh yeah it was easy. Very simple: I had to practice it several times to get it the way Roger wanted it.

      The legs felt like hip boots, wading boots they went up to the waist.; They were irrigation boots about up to the knees.; Wading boots they came straight up to the hips.

      I think the feet were made out of old house slippers.; They weren't no slippers.
      I was walking in my stocking feet inside the costume.; I was wearing shoes.

      No metal parts.; It had a zipper.
      I had to wiggle into it kinda like a t-shirt.; It had a zipper up the back.

      There were numerous more contradictions , also about the location I couldn't be bothered to dig up, purely cause I'm embarrassed that you would use such a source if I'm honest and I'm bored of it.

      The Gemora suit is another laughable comparison and again; a coping mechanism.

      Leaping Russian Yeti; there's your Bigfoot found since 1946.

      There is no evidence for Patty standing still ready for a cameraman; in fact... she was startled and rose from the creek bed and then walked off in confusion. Again, lies and cynicism.

      Patty does not stumble at the start... EVEN more lies, and misinformation. This is purely how you in particular like to roll.

      All your points had no basis in truth, facts and were either cynicism or pure lies.

      You were schooled by Joe Fitzgerald, and you are welcome.

      ... No, no... the pleasure's all mine!

      Peace.

      Delete
    21. Hi MJA, I think it was the Kauri harvested from the bogs. I think I also got a piece of the rimu from terry as well. I'm not familiar with your lancewood species. I was interested in the meterosideros species Northern and southern rata. The shipping costs far outweighed the value of the wood. I shipped him a small box less than 2 pounds and I think it cost like 126 dollars. It's cheaper to ship by sea but then that takes an eternity and things tend to get lost with that method. I have purchased quite a bit of wood from Australia in particular some of the burls of the various eucalyptus species. These guys spend weeks at a time out in the bush harvesting these burls. I once asked a few of them their opinion on the Yowie. Not one of the replied. So I'm guessing it might be much less talked about than our cryptic bigfoots in the states. Later J.D.

      Delete
    22. I think its never talked about and people get laughed at when it is brought up. The yowie legends apprently was first told by a american explorer. Well thats what they teach in schools their. Plus aus has 6 of the 10 most deadly snakes and 4 spiders 4 of those snakes are highly agressive and capible of killing 100 or more with a single bite. They would wipe out yowie fast.
      Take care

      Delete
    23. Joe. I'm sure you've been asked this a thousand times. But......allegedly Doctor Jeff Meldrum has such an extensive library of tracks that through his collaborative efforts with Mammalian Apr print expert Jimmy Chilcutt they've been correctly able to identify several returning California subjects through latent dermal ridge, size, shape and other characteristics. Here's a fucking tough one. Only true FOOTERs will now this one. Happy Froday Everyone. How many times has Patty's alleged signature track been found. If, when and where? If you don't know I'm breaking up with you and Shawn. Do you have Henry Mays number?

      Delete
    24. Damn it man I'm an enthusiast not a statistician. Have you heard this in any interview (s) that overlap. Any old TV Shows perhaps. ,?

      Delete
    25. RAGING IDIOTIC KNUCKLE DRAGGING SLACK JAWED BLANK STARING DROOLING SCEPTARD ALERTFriday, September 6, 2013 at 3:16:00 PM PDT

      Patterson's pre-Patty bigfoot drawings do not look like Patty.

      That's a tired claim from the worn out Disinformation Bureau.

      Delete
    26. the fact they were female, with large pendulous breasts,tells us they are pretty close too each other.
      eitherway the fact footers are still speaking about Patterson film 50years later tells you there is no evidence. 50years ago people must have thought it was a matter of time b4 they caught one, filmed them hundreds of times. yet its still the only good film here is of bigfoot

      for me the character who took it is the films biggest failing.he wasn't considered as a man of character,he was broke, he was needing cash uickly in his fight against cancer, he worked for wildlife studio.add this together and u get a clever hoax

      where is patty 234 etc...

      ive no doubt blobsquatch exists,leaf/treesquatch too. I even believe a tall man walked down marble mountain. To believe there are thousands of 8ft giants in US National parks escaping trail cams and all the digital age technology without ever running out of luck

      we take great pucs of snowy leapords. I watched a doc on a guy who spent months trying to capture oe in the wild. In the end he did,he even caugh it in a chase for food with a deer.
      Bigfoot has seen hundreds of people seek it, trail cams set up etc etc and all we have is 2 dodgy characters films n blobs

      ill turn the lights out as I leave

      Delete
    27. or a well put argument that u cant intelligently comment too. this means you are reduced to dumbass vitriol.
      please post link to bigfoot evidence that isnt 50years old. you know something with HD technological capability. there should be a plethora of them. after all we are talking about 8-10ft 600pound giants who apparently amble about in slow motion in our national parks
      just 1 will do me
      if you cant ,its best you shut the fuck up, dullard! ad allow adults to discuss the chances of a species unknown to science is living in North Americ

      stick to he taterhole,firsting etc...posts

      Delete
    28. joe fitzgerald-ive read some long winded shit on this site.you win
      please post links to where you get the belief in bigfoot please
      or is it just a feeling"?

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Even worse than being an anon poster is being one of the comment removed by author posters. I makes me wonder, did the person blurt out something really stupid during a heated debate after letting his testosterone get the best of him?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Going squatchin tomorrow!

    Flying to Dublin to track down 'Paddy' the Irish Bigfoot.

    Top of the morning to yer...

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Awesome"! Unfortunately, the only thing I can think about is a patty melt sandwich." I love cheese". Don't forget your compass. And for Heavens sake, stay safe and get some good DNA or a body. Hey Joe and co.!

      Delete
    2. Or atleast make sure you have a good autofocus on your camera

      Delete
    3. You are right about that. A body would be hard to explain as a carry on.

      Delete
    4. I could just amagin the custom reaction to a dead 8ft apeman in your luggage

      Delete
    5. You are right again. Unless you gut and deboned it and disguised it as hairy luggage?

      Delete
    6. Cleaver, you are, I must say. New Zealand, I have only seen in post cards. It looks like what dreams are made of! Do they have cheese burgers there?

      Delete
    7. Of course. We have everything here. And it is the place dreams are made of.

      Delete
    8. Awesome!! I am on the way to the land of the Hobbit..By the way, we sometimes call the hamburger a patty melt. But being a footer, it's hard to digest that definition.

      Hey joe, where ever you are?

      Delete
    9. Hobbiton? The land if realy small people. Its quite interesting there. You just have to watch you dont hit your head every time you walk through a door.

      Delete
    10. MJA. Sorry for asking silly tourist questions but aren't my boys Germaine and Bret from Flight of the Conchords from around there. Talented if you ask me. Funny. Fine actors. Not bad musicians. "Bowie s in Space" might be the best "Space Oddity " tribute ever. And there have been some good ones. Just look at Baxter Robinsons "Major Tom"

      Delete
    11. Yes mike flight of the conchords are from around here. Nz have some massive talet but alot of it goes un noticed because things like music and acting is very low on the budget. Sports it where you will find the superstars of nz.

      Delete
    12. MJA. Your stock is rising fast. Wonder if busy Mr Jore F wants to entertain our question of the day. MKB with Bad British Accent, "Now see here dear fellow, what did you say your name was again, right, yes., well do be a good lad and stop acting like Guy Ritchie in Sting and Trudie Stylers' guest house when the gas bill arrives, and by that by Jove by Joe Do answer a fellows question?

      Delete
    13. Got donkey?

      Royal ass.

      Delete
  11. Of all the researchers I find Dr. Matthew Johnson the most credible. I would be tempted to eat the contents of one of those bowls. How come no one has ever brought up the bigfoot accounts of Joanie Ocean? Or Autumn Williams when she lived in Orting WA around 1972. which is the same time as Jevenings sighting in Graham WA which is just up the hill from orting???

    ReplyDelete
  12. Squatches only exist in the minds of idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Seen two bigfoots last night filmed them and as we watched the video this morning one of them had a black collar around his neck, same material as a ratchet strap has anyone else ever seen this before, is it for locating them or tracking them???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yawn.

      Show the video or stfu.

      Delete
    2. Bigfoots are known to have a bondage/asphyxiation fetish.

      I've been tracking sasquatches for 25 years.

      Delete
    3. I'm trying to post the video now u can see the strap around his neck clear as day

      Delete
    4. Just a heads up on this video folks: YGNALI

      Delete
  14. Eva R what do the xx's mean? Are you trying to tell us that you have a Bigfoot porn site online? Let me guess the videos with Bigfoot are blurry.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yall aint got no evidunce for no big feller does you.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hello Anon from previous blog,i copy and pasted your question,the xx's mean kiss kiss,i don't anything about porn im afraid,bigfoot or otherwise xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry,that should read don't know anything xx

      Delete
    2. Good day to you Eva R. I just woke up and I am already to take a nap. xxvi

      Delete
    3. Videos up everyone's lovin it ! Cheers

      Delete
    4. Hey eva

      Anon 9.00 wheres the link? Maby you need to wake up from dream world and face reality

      Delete
  17. Why would a person who had the capability of becoming invisible anytime that he wants, need a blind to keep from being seen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because it makes them "feel concealed". MJA. Nice to see you back. Observations sound as usual.

      Delete
    2. Anon 9:20, that sounds a lot like Predator. It's not sporting when they are invisible...

      Delete
  18. This is a fallen tree structure that can be used for hunting. It's a debris type shelter. The amount of old leaves under it are a dead giveaway. This is nothing more than a debris hut located for hunting.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I deduce this is a sad lonely man

    ReplyDelete
  20. This message is for D.L. Soucy.

    Last summer I came across a peculiar structure of unknown origin in the forest. Long story short, after carefully examining it over the course of several days, the evidence led us to come to a rather starling conclusion as to it's intended purpose and operation. I can only say that the hunting techique used was unique and novel. And now I find myself with new knowledge of a hunting technique never before described (that I can find)

    Of course I can't say for a fact who or what employs this method to hunt. I found this blog while searching for any collaborating information. Good luck in your endevour!!

    ReplyDelete