Breaking News From Robert Lindsay: Dr. Bryan Sykes study may well prove that Bigfoots exist
 |
| Image credit: Bigfootology.com |
We just received a phone call from Robert Lindsay regarding Dr. Sykes and the news is explosive! Lindsay tells us several of his sources close to the Sykes project has confirmed that the Bigfoot DNA results are "positive". Whatever this means, no one really knows, but Lindsay sounded super enthusiastic about it on the call. Here's what he wrote on his blog last night:
Dr. Bryan Sykes study may well prove that Bigfoots exist. From multiple sources, I have now received the news that not only will the Sykes DNA study publish soon, it will also prove that Bigfoots exist. None of the sources would tell me this in so many words, but they certainly implied that the findings would be positive. So I am looking forward to publication of the study. On the other hand, it is possible though not likely that the sources are all wrong and the study could be negative.
[via Robert Lindsay]
Yeah sure.. I'm not gonna hold my breath for this.
ReplyDeleteHi. I'm Robert Lindsay. I'm going to tell you something, then tell you I don't REALLY knoW anything about. I'll be sure to leave myself an out. But my buddy Shawn cares just as little about the facts as I do, so he'll write an exciting headline, we'll both get attention and make money from blog hits. That about covers it, I think.
DeleteHow is this "breaking news"? Hey folks! Once again, RL might know something... But maybe not!!!!!!!
DeleteFirst! ha, finally.
ReplyDelete^that is a great false first.
DeleteRobert Lindsay is yellow journalism at its finest. Nice to see you following in his putrid footsteps, Shawn.
Delete^ settle down there gay for Shawn guy
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAre you a dude?
DeleteClick on Isis name & you can get a better look
DeleteHard to tell, I mean she's hot but she could be a dude, the neck area is cut off so it's hard to see if she's got an atoms apple?
Isis is definitely a woman. I know her quite well. She is a friend of mine.
DeleteI don't know buddy, I checked your page out and I think your a smart dude and all but a guy like you looks like he could be fooled pretty easily....
DeleteEspecially by this ISIS creature
Isis a man or a woman?
DeleteDo not forget, Uncle Bob brought you this news FIRST!
DeleteRobert, any word on the Dyer circus? Forget bigfoot, do people who believe him actually exist? Or are all those clowns that comprise Team Tracker part of the scam? Thanks...
DeleteRL is just stirring things up again. Just another clown performing in the Bigfoot circus. Go back to your room now, Robert.
DeleteClowns scare me. :(
DeleteI would like to see a debate between Joe and Robert Lindsay.
DeleteLindsay saying that Sykes has definitive proof is not a good sign. Look at his track record: He hyped and said the Erickson Project was the real deal, he said that Ketchum's paper would be a watershed moment of modern civilization, and he persisted in perpetuating the myth that Dyer had a real bigfoot specimen. I'd love for Sykes to have the goods. Maybe he does. At least Sykes appears to have more credibility/credentials than Lindsay's prior sure things.
DeleteUnfortunately this would be much more exciting if Dyer hadn't destroyed your credibility Robert.
DeleteYou had plenty of opportunities to call quits on Hank but you hung on in there.
Very strange.
For what it's worth I'm hearing the same 'positive' noises about this as well.
Bizarre times ahead.
MMG
My pants have been removed by the author.
Delete4:56 Clowns scare me imitaterhole
DeleteWhatever Sykes has, and assuming it's positive, it'll have to be pretty close to the proof Ketchum presented because us in the know do know what these elusive and intelligent beings are, and also what they're not.
DeleteTick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock....
ReplyDeletePeace.
Easy there, Joe. Lindsay is a goofball who makes up stuff to get people to read his blog, an attention--needy "journalist. Just go back and read some of his posts over the past year.
DeleteBUCKLE UP!
Delete23 years!!!
DeleteI'm not going on what he says at all.
DeletePeace.
WHERE IS THE WHISPERER?????? I play his theme song every time I pick up my guitar. Hauntingly beautiful, yet so simple. A true masterpiece.
DeleteAnd where is the recipe guy? I'm getting hungry.
Deletefirst of all, lindsay is a major douchebag. we all know it.
Deletesecond, he "may" prove it.....or he may not. This is not news.
Third OMG here we go again? NOooooooooo!
^ Second of all you are a major crybaby. we all know it ... change your tampon and quit your whining lady
DeleteIt would be something if this study proves Bigfoot exist - everyone will be Bigfooting......or maybe people will be selling off all their camping equipment and the parks will go empty?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if it would be enough evidence for the main stream media or whatever?
Firstly; Militant Tardists selling camping gear is a given... Why do you think they frequent this blog so much? For reassurance.
DeleteSecondly, whatever the mainstream media decides to do, it will have to take notice of a BBC documentary that Sykes has contributed to, and though the majority of people will try and denounce Sykes' credibility... It will actually eat at them every time enthusiasts can reference one of the most important people in modern science as one within our theory camp.
If I was a Militant Tardist... I'd be up all night putting the hours in coming up with creative reasons to not believe him.
Peace.
Wait for the results before claiming you know what they are you jackass
DeleteScared?
DeletePeace.
Scared for the human race knowing there are people dumb enough to think bigfoot is real? Yes. Yes I am.
DeleteI know bigfoot is real, but I hope the study comes out negative because of the ultimate pwnage it would dish out to Jackass Joe.
DeleteInteresting perspective from someone who knows they exist. Even the believers would like to see joe pwned it seems!
DeleteAlso how do you know they exist?
Joe only has non-intimate relationships.
DeleteAnon 3:34...
DeleteNo, you're just scared cause someone with the credibility of Sykes is going to make you seek out your popa's gun next time you're camping.
Anon 3:40... The one that can't hold his ground as a Bigfoot enthusiast and is bitter at people who can with intelligence levels far preceding that of his own...
Grow a pair and learn from me or something. Your stance is sad considering you believe in Bigfoot. Bitter.
Peace.
Karma is a sweet justice for the sheer arrogance and ignorance laid down by the pious Brit who's never been to America, let alone actually done anything in bigfooting besides letting his fingers fly on the righteous keyboard of unfounded faith.
DeleteKarma?
DeleteI think you misunderstand how the universe and karma works in general, you silly, hypocritical troll.
You see, what I do from over the other side of the pond, is support and defend the innumerable people who have had life changing experiences through their encounters and the people who have been left traumatized by their experiences. I defend the people who have risked and faced ridicule from their respective research fields and I have an understanding and knowledge of the subject enough to contribute to productive discussion on a blog that promotes the subject matter.
I also have dear friends that are in the field and feeding back to me on a weekly basis.
You, are an arrogant, ignorant troll. And it takes a particular type of personality to do what you do. You prioritize your time to expressing hate and the censorship of truth; therefore nobody has more negative karma points stored than you, you stupid little nobody.
You make attaining an ego easy; you disgusting personality you.
And you are scared... So much so that you attack me and the enthusiasts on this blog in the most cowardice way possible.
DeleteI can rest well at night knowing that I would never stoop to the level you do and would never confront someone in the way you do... Like hitting someone from behind when they're not looking...
Pussy. Ha! The joke's on you.
Rabble rabble excuses rabble never leaving wales rabble rabble Monsterquest rabble kooky claims rabble rabble no evidence rabble natives rabble Hollywood Ro rabble Oxford rabble rabble
DeleteRabble rabble sad heart rabble cat lover rabble rabble schooling rabble no bigfoot ever rabble ever rabble never rabble ghosts rabble aliens rabble. Mindspeak rabble
DeleteHA HA HA HA! I'm more of a dog man actually... And your dribble means you have nothing worthwhile to contribute. I'll leave you stew on my comments for now.
DeletePeace.
Joe's a troll,,,
DeleteJoe, you are a jackass and a moron. The fact that you watch "Ancient Aliens" says more about your mental capacity than any DRIVEL you post here.
DeleteListen bro... Don't bother trying to provoke me into another debate, is no doubt educate you a little in that subject as well.
DeleteYawn.
(Sigh)
Peace.
Ancient aliens lollers
Delete"Little man syndrome" Joe. People who brag about their "intelligence" are actually the least intelligent people in the room.
DeleteI don't brag about my intelligence, only the lack of it from trolls who frequent this blog.
DeleteGet it right.
Peace.
I am a no life loser that sits in his moms basement all day researching bigfoot. There is no way in hell you could educate me on this subject.
DeleteI approve that Yawn
Deletethe Yawn guy
6:52 is imposter Yawn guy.
DeleteLame and Yawn
Yawn
DeleteLame
Delete7:09 HA! you got Lamed and Yawned you imitaterhole ... what a looser
Delete7:09 the gay for the Yawn guy guy
Delete7:41,41,:43,:51 -- I'm curious, did you have to earn a GED or are the pimps paying their bitches better than they were in the 80's?
Delete^ the gay for the Yawn guy guy
DeleteJoe will be pwned when this study says no bigfoot
ReplyDeleteTick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock....
DeletePeace.
No monkey I am afraid and no hairy people either.
DeleteHuman contamination is human contamination, not an impossible human hybrid that is supposed to look like patty... lol
I'm pretty skepticle these days. But if the Sykes study proves the DNA is unique we will see some well funded studies to locate one and it will be a matter of time until a study turns up a body
DeleteCouldn't sleep last night Joe......strangest thing. Clock noises.
DeleteAnon 2:14...
DeleteThese are a type of human, and the results are inline with ten thousand years of Native culture that have always insisted these creatures were another tribe of humans. It's the reason people like you have had so much to scoff at, because for the last 46 years, people who have dictated the theory pool of this subject have been looking for a bipedal gorilla; that isn't there.
Scared?
Mike! HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
Peace.
Inquiring minds are curious as to exactly how many times Mr. Lindsay can post completely false information without losing what minimal credibility he may possess.
DeleteOh i didnt realise you had seen the results joe
DeleteNative culture insisted gorillas were people as well. Even orangutan means "forest person". Could this mean natives are wrong?
DeleteThe ground up Tiger molar and ivory tusk that I got from the native Indonesian clearly benefited my headaches and erectile dysfunction.
DeleteAnon 3:32...
Deletehttp://youtu.be/VApv_wyANuo
... Fast forward to 29 minutes and enjoy.
Anon 3:45...
This is not true of the North American Natives, because they had no understanding of what apes were or looked like (though I understand we are apes as well), making it also pretty hard for them to make a secret society for the past ten thousand years out of gorilla suits jumping out saying boo to people. You must also take into account that Bigfoot for thousands of years have shared the occasional burial mound with Native tribes (check out Jim Vieira on YouTube about this); the Cherokee for example, outlining a heightened intelligence and even culture. They have language as well (check out Scott Nelson on YouTube about this).
Peace.
That's some real conclusive physical evidence of an extreme claim you've got there PJ
DeleteI'm challenging your opinion that they are a type of people. Of course Native Americans would say that because they have nothing else to compare them to. Even natives where apes are relatively common said they were people. Just because native culture says they are, does not make it true.
DeleteYou need to stop stating your theories as fact Joe. You don't know for 100% fact that they exist, let alone what they are. All you have are beliefs. Nobody has ever won or will ever win a debate based on belief.
BOOM! Joe got PWNED!
DeleteThe smell of FEAR!
DeleteMMG
BUCKLE UP!!
DeleteYou see... This where I can counter you in all confidence, because I never post a theory unless I can back it up; in this case I have experts in Jim Vieria (uncovering 100 years of printed news media that these creatures bury their dead), Scott Nelson who is a cryptolinguist that has served in the US Military Intelligence (transcribed a complex language out of what was initially thought to be ape chatter) and I also have the best forensic artist in the country Harvey Pratt who has sketched many eyewitnesses accounts that have uncovered human, native faces of Bigfoot. He has also taken off the hair of Patty's face (he does this with bank robbers that wear fake beards and hats), to which it was conclusive that Patty has what looks to be native or at least human featchers as well. You can also look at Steindorf's digital recreation on Google Image Search that promotes this idea of Patty's face further.
DeleteDave Paulides, who holds two degrees from the University of San Francisco, and has a professional background that includes twenty years in law enforcement and senior executive positions in the technology sector... Has interviewed many tribes up and down the States that have had interactions with these creatures for thousands of years, even trading... None of these tribes have ever claimed that these creatures are anything less than another tribe of humans, sometimes even referring to them as cannibals.
You see, these are not just my 'beliefs' but theories that are based on people that have contributed long research on the subject, allocating their expertise from respective fields to determine that these creatures are of an equalled intelligence to us and therefore not the same as dumb animals. Think of it... We would have found a gorilla by now. Something that practices a language and burying implies a culture.
The frequency of sightings is exactly what a researcher would expect from a nocturnal 'type' of human that buries it's dead. The frequency and location of tracks attained also reflects an accurate frequency of evidence. I keep saying it, but bear remains are never found. We see enough of them because there are more of them and they do not have the calculative evasion techniques that a highly intelligent hominid would have.
No... I can state with all confidence that these creatures exist. I can because unlike you, I have researched this subject and have friends who have had life changing experiences with them.
Peace.
The bottom line Joe, whoa whoa whoa! Did you SERIOUSLY use David Paulides as a person with credibility to back up your "theories"?
DeleteREALLY?!?!
That's it folks. Game over. Joe has been trolling us this whole time!
I should have realized when you referenced Scott Carpenter's blog and again when you mentioned Ketchum.
I bow down to you Joe. You have dethroned Ed Smith for the title of King Of Trolls.
THE KING IS DEAD!
LONG LIVE THE KING!
So...you have nothing but unfounded half-truths, campfire stories, hearsay, and a ton of arbitrary "experts" who are on their last few breaths and need some financial support for the future of their families?
DeleteWhere else have we seen that situation...oh yeah, Roger Patterson.
You have nothing admissible, PJ, and you know it. Cite all the amateur YouTube clips you want, all the geriatric "experts" who can never seem to get anyone of any merit to verify their claims, keep copying and pasting resumes because in the end, you'll still have nothing.
When Sykes study shows NO BF in NA, Joe, I want you to delete your blog account. If you have that much faith in Sykes, put up or shut up. If Sykes has NOTHING then you stop posting on this blog forever.
Honestly, I don't think you have the willpower or the testicle fortitude to actually do it.
Jack, is that you?
DeleteJeff?
DeletePeople like you, arss-winker, must look at how much the Sierra Sounds for example were scrutinized prior to Scott coming along, which has only been very recently. The same level of attention & scrutiny would not diminish over the past couple of years surely? So that tells me that Scott's work stands up. The Sierra Sounds being that of some of the most profound Bigfoot Evidence enthusiasts have and therefore in the firing line more. It can be claimed that if something is not yet questioned or double opinionated; it comes down to whether your glass is half empty, or half full, or whether you have an agenda to accept it or be skeptical of it... However, with the wider scientific dogma surrounding this subject, along with the wider negative agendas (like arss-winker's) people like him cannot perceive Scott, David, Harvey or Jim (who is not retired) as pioneers as opposed to a loan theorists. All research fields have started off with one person, and in recent times since the change of mindset about what this creature actually is, you will not find people who have applied their research methods and have come to any other conclusion that this creature is a reality. No mainstream science would give this subject the first bit of legitimate time so people like arss-winker use that to their advantage to claim it can't stand up without backing. Well I say you can't get anymore experienced in Harvey & Scott's fields so find someone to prove them wrong.
DeleteComparing this subject to mainstream scientific research accumulation as an example is not sufficient, because mainstream science has done everything it can to ridicule and censor this type of anthropological research up until now... But Sykes is coming.
You see, with that information that I referenced earlier, we have physical evidence like dermals and DNA, along with two pieces of footage that you cannot explain. This accumulates and when administered to you by someone like me, leaves you with a very big headache to which you as a result suggest I go away after the Sykes study? Ha!! You would like that wouldn't you? There we have it guys! Only someone as scared and as hell bent on censoring the truth would draw someone out on a 'deal' to leave a blog where the person suggesting such a proposition get's his arss handed to him multiple times a week. How about you go away into your sad little world where you know all the answers, if Sykes has what we enthusiasts are after? I will always be here and I will always get at you and I will always enjoy it... Sad little arss-winker.
Wildlife consultant john miedzinski when working for the fish and game in the State of Wyoming had his job threatened because of his involvement into an investigation into Bigfoot prints and an encounter. He had to remain silent for 30 years and is now a researcher and adviser to Jeff Meldrum.
Delete... And people like arss-winker want to draw on the fact that experts have to wait till they are retired to apply their expertise for fear of being reprisals?
Laughable.
That's a longwinded way to say that you have nothing and with all of the faith you've put in Sykes for the past 3 months, tick tocking this and Sykes is coming that, you won't put your money where your mouth is.
DeleteConspiracy to cover up this, science is so unfair that, Sykes is coming, Joe, tick...tock...tick...tock.
Name call all you want. You say posting anon is cowardly but you are as equal in cowardice by spouting off for months that Sykes will prove it all and now the time is close at hand, you won't stand up for the words that you've been typing.
Sykes has nothing proving BF in NA then you leave, Joe, you lose your BE addiction...you leave for good.
Jeff Meldrum, the man who verified several hoaxed tracks as real, self-publishes his work and his friends work in his journal, brings interest to a tiny shithole college, and has never seen a bigfoot?
DeleteAwesome "experts."
Put up or shut up, joe, or are you that scared that Sykes has nothing tht you don't want to lose your version of crack?
"Please leave us to troll this site in freedom?! Please leave us to try and pursue a hate campaign?! Please leave us to try and mind bend people into believing lies and censorship? Please stop bullying me?!"
DeleteThat's what I got from all that. Remember arss-winker, you're in my back yard here and to request that I go anywhere is the most audacious, desperate, sad thing anyone has put to me ever on this blog.
What 'word' exactly have I not stood up to? Do you even know what you are on about? (Sigh, this is getting pitiful) Sykes will be as good as his samples are arss-winker; we can't lose. Ha ha! This is what you people are too dumb to foresee. And this is why I won't be complying to your begging for me to stop bullying you whatever the Sykes scenario is going to be.
What's the matter arss-winker? Getting to you am I??
Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock....
Scared?
Peace.
What you may not realize is that I was here long before you, PJ. I don't troll this site, I troll you because you're an arrogant faggot. You don't possess above average wit or intelligence, you're average and mediocre but you do possess an ego that is in high need of deflating. Honestly, I thought I was narcissistic but after months of seeing the tripe that you post, I've learned just how much smoke one can blow up his own ass.
DeleteYou're scared and nervous, Joe. If Sykes has definitive, replicable proof of BF in NA then awesome! You get what you've wanted for so long and can rub it into whomevers face for however long you want.
If Sykes comes back with NOTHING then you should delete your account(s) and move on. You've ran your mouth for long enough, so put up or shut up, ya fucking Welsh cunt. I'd think you were French if you actually brushed your teeth.
Tick tock, joe, you're scared.
^that's some pwnage going down right there.
Delete^ replying to himself
Delete7:44, actually I'm not. I don't need to respond to myself because there are enough skeptical people here that feel the same as I do. Believe what you wish, doesn't affect me.
DeleteHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! I am clearly getting to you and I am very much enjoying it.
DeleteFor someone who doesn't possess above average wit or intelligence I surely put the schooling on boring, bitter nobodies like you and for that; is it any wonder I have an ego?
I can honestly say, that I have little fear of the results that are coming because I know that they are going to be in favour of what we expect.
http://youtu.be/VApv_wyANuo
... Fast forward to 29 minutes and understand that Sykes has already isolated Bigfoot DNA, or did at the time and required one more sample to which he gave himself an extension to attain... Why else would he give himself an extension? Because it underlines his theory on the legitimacy of this species and further outlines his agenda to deliver on that theory. Now, he's brought forward that extension; I wonder why?
Ha ha ha ha ha!!! A Welsh c**t?? HA HA HA HA!!!
We can go around in circles again if you like? I think it'll be a necessity to be honest until this finally sinks in.
Though I'm bored of you, I have all day.
Schooled (HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!)
^ yeah sure ... u so funny lady
Delete^for 8:00
DeleteLook at you, depending on the unfounded words of a man.
DeleteTake away your precious Ro, Leaping Yeti, resume collection and you're a barren soul to bigfoot.
You can't even acknowledge how right that I am.
All of these months, repeated copy and pasting, smoke and mirrors, Sykes is coming this and that and you won't put your reputation where your mouth is because you aren't scared that I'm right, you're scared that you are WRONG. It's the sign of true narcissism.
Give in Joe, if Sykes comes forward with nothing (after all, it's as good as gold with Mr. Lindsay and his sources, Hollywood Ro, Sykes, Cutino, and Smeja) then you should delete your account(s) and move on.
Or do you still cling to the ET paranormal bullshit? Cause if so, those aren't humans like you've been touting.
Either you're wrong and you leave, or you get the single biggest TOLD YOU SO in modern sciences' history.
Tick tock joe, you're scared.
Arss-winker -
Delete"Please leave us to troll this site in freedom?! Please leave us to try and pursue a hate campaign?! Please leave us to try and mind bend people into believing lies and censorship? Please stop bullying me?!"
HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!
Arss-winker... I don't have to be scared of anything, I can't lose. Do you require me to spell it out for you? You want me to promise you that I leave when the subject matter won't be affected by the outcome... What type of narcissism is that?! That I leave because you think I should??
DeleteNo, I'm happy where I am and love what I do and that's put ignorant little haters like you in your place.
Know how I can prove you are a very scared little hater? Because a scared little hater wouldn't come out of the woodwork since his last pasting, and preach hate in response to the article up top.
"Please leave us to troll this site in freedom?! Please leave us to try and pursue a hate campaign?! Please leave us to try and mind bend people into believing lies and censorship? Please stop bullying me?!"
HA HA HA HA!!!!
Ha ha, I forgot Lindsay existed.
ReplyDeleteSo, his sources say if the report proves Bigfoot is real, then it will. If it doesn't, it won't. Whatta scoop!
Well if you remember Lindsay and have ever read his blog you know he is special
DeleteNot hard to forget a guy like Lindsay exsisted
Well except for his willingness to post garbage stories that offend people etc.
Special. That made me smile.
DeleteSpecial mean retarded
Delete^Exactly.
Delete^Exactly.
DeleteSo Sykes' report will either be positive or negative? Whoooo what a SCOOP!
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and welcome to jackass
ReplyDeleteLindsay has had "sources" before. Most of those statements weren't credible to begin with so why should I believe that he was special enough to get inside information when he's never really had much inside info on anything?
ReplyDeleteMy sources tell me Robert Lindsay's sources and Rick Dyer's investors are one and the same.
Deletemy sources tell me that you have no penis
DeleteAnother bulls eye for Robert "Sniper" Lindsay!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteListen up everyone Joe Fitzgerald has actually seen the results! All questions should be directed to him.
ReplyDeleteJoe used his seer powers to determine the results before the study was ever started.
DeleteIt's called mindspeak you dumbass!
DeleteNo, it's called straight from the horses mouth...
Deletehttp://youtu.be/VApv_wyANuo
... Fast forward to 29 minutes and enjoy.
Peace.
"Straight from the horses mouth" - lol.
DeleteSykes ain't even on that show you jackass.
Also you don't even know what the results he is looking for are.
Jackass.
A comment from Joerg H. on Robert Lindsay's blog post:
Delete"On the Sykes study: also the first “rumours” sound very promising (for believers like me), one has to be cautious. Remember the DNA brought back by a British TV expedition to Bhutan in 2001 or 2002? The hair samples from a place called Sakteng were handed over to Sykes. Sykes told the press after the first check that his team found DNA “never encountered before”? After that nothing was heard from Sykes anymore, but when a British “cryptozoologist” asked him about more conclusive results about one year later, Sykes told him that it was DNA from an Asiatic/Himalayan black bear! Black bear?!! One would think, DNA of such an obvious species would be identified easily during the very first examination. I also wrote an email to his laboratory and they given me the same answer. So, why did Sykes told the press there was “unknown DNA” in it? Just a comment to “advise caution” regarding Sykes – at least for those believers who expect too much from this study."
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/bigfoot-news-september-11-2013/
Thank you Joerg!
Thanks^
DeleteAwaiting joes reasoning for why that is not important....
Joe's brain doesn't work like that. It's either bigfoot or a conspiracy to cover up bigfoot, how the fuck dare you question such extreme claims and how dare you follow up on investigations!
DeleteJoe is writhing in anticipation to the coming of Sykes.
DeleteIt's pretty simple actually.
DeleteI am not going to comment too much on this because I don't know enough about it... I will say that I don't see how this happening, if indeed if it did happen, would have any baring on determining other samples since.
It is possible that he merely he got his results inaccurate. The fact that he put this right at a later date would be significant for credibility's sake, would it not?
You can expect all sort's of comments like this as soon as his paper is published also.
Tick, tock, tick, tock.
Peace.
Joe, your writing skills are slipping. Are you getting over-excited by all this nothing?
DeleteI still think Joe is a troll...
DeleteI still think Joe is a troll...
DeleteJoe, your writing skills are slipping. Are you getting over-excited by all this nothing?
Delete^ the gay for Joe guy
DeleteSo there is something wrong with being gay? I didn't realize so many bigfooters were homophobic. It's amazing that Rictor is still alive with all the gay bashing in the BF community.
DeleteAnd you folks wonder why people laugh at you.
^ the gay for Joe guy
Delete^ MMG dangling on PJ's weathered scrotum
Delete^ the gay for MMG guy
DeleteRobert Lindsay does not know his ass from his elbow. He has NO inside information anywhere. He has NO sources. He makes things up. He admitted that he is not interested in the facts during the Shooting Bigfoot fiasco. What a TIT.
ReplyDeleteRobert Lindsay has special insider knowledge about the distinction between his ass and his elbow. They didn't outright tell him the answer but they heavily implied that his ass above his elbow, although he could be wrong.
DeleteI like tits
DeleteEven Patty's giant fur-covered schmoobies?
DeleteIsn't RL a pedophile? Not really relevant, but...
DeleteIsn't RL a pedophile? Not really relevant, but...
DeleteWhy, do you find that arousing?
DeleteWhy, do you find that arousing?
DeleteThere is no way he is going to name or even claim to have discovered an animal on DNA alone..Such a paper is far in the future and will most likely be published in a journal on complexity theory(the study of algorithms)..lol..
ReplyDeleteI guess he can compare the samples to each other and propose some inferences if not draw any conclusions, but I don't know and I doubt many do. There is no precedent for this kind of thing(obviously I am discounting Ketchum's self-published circus; believers with a clue shot that down...)
What if Sykes' results replicated Ketchum's finding's?
DeletePeace.
That certainly would draw attention to her paper and it will no longer matter it did not appear in a peer review journal..I.e, many more experts will actually read it...
DeleteI gotta get to work..have a good one...
DeleteA human hybrid from 10000 years ago. Not possible im afraid. Such a creature would have to be almost identical to a human that it would be indistinguishable. Certainly not a hairy 9 foot ape man with compliant gait, long arms for quadropedal motion, full hair coverage and a conical head.
DeleteDo you footers even know what you are claiming?
4:38 is right, in evolutionary terms it is 100% impossible for a type of human to branch off 10-15k years ago and be so different. Science may not always have the answer but evolution just does not work that way. Human + lemur/15,000 year ago cannot in any way ever = 9ft 800lb ape man
DeleteWhat if Sykes' results are inconclusive? Or (gasp) show known animals?
DeleteWhen Sykes explains that he has nothing replicable then Joe needs to delete his blog account and quit commenting on this blog. How's that for faith, PJ? All or nothing. Sykes has nothing showing a bigfoot in NA then you leave for good.
DeleteI don't think you have the balls to do it.
Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock...
DeleteGetting to you am I arss-winker?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
If Sykes results are inconclusive or show known animals then what the hell is the paper going to be about? A scathing rip of cryptozoology published in a philosophy of science journal or something like that? Well, I guess we will learn what the deal is pretty soon...
Deleteyup pretty soon lady
DeleteI am hoping that if the Sykes study verifies the species beyond any rational doubt, that the government, which must already know this fact, will impliment protocols for preservation and protection which they have already prepared, awaiting this eventuality. There will be resistance from private landowners and the lumber industry et al but sasquatch's status as a native people will carry much weight.
ReplyDeleteCorrect... The implications on the economy, if the results are indeed embraced, would be almost catastrophic in places. Brace yourself for a potential landslide of morality.
DeletePeace.
What are you guys going to do when the Sykes study turns up nothing? Will you finally admit that there is no Bigfoot?
DeleteJoe you should become a fiction writer. You have a vivid imagination.
Delete4.40 Unfortunately they wont admit there is no bigfoot. That's how bigfooting works and whats happened for the last 50 years.
DeleteThey can sit there and say "the proof is coming soon" and nothing can change that because you can not prove bigfoot don't exist.
Its a nice cushy position they put themselves in where their fantasy can live on forever.
A journal publication and a multi-part BBC documentary about nothing. Hmmmm or perhaps a multi-part BBC documentary and a scientific journal publication about either contamination or mythos. Nope. That does it. I am 100% certain Joe is correct. That all signs point directly to Discovery. Furthermore it's been leaked and downright confirmed that Joe was SPOT ON about Smejas boots and what they yielded. It is becoming painfully obvious that Joe Fitzgerald knows more than you skeptics believe. I know what Joe has been told by one insider. And it's pretty amazing stuff. No Dear Sweet Anons. I humbly ask that all of you consider new conservative hobbies. Perhaps Republican Fundraising. In the interim, Joe has even more shocks for you soon to come. So sit back, relax and enjoy the popcorn. Joe. When you have a moment. Email me. Good day, eh?
DeleteYou're joking, right? Look what we have done to actual real modern homosapien sapien's...Native Americans -- Stole their land, raped their women, slaughtered nearly an entire race, and generally have F'd them over for 250 years. Look how we treated black people...
DeleteDo you really think we give two flying fucks about some mythical ape man in the woods we constantly deforest, build malls on, and use as a giant profit?
Get real. If BF is real, fuck'em if they can't survive. They'll end up like those pussy panda bears, only reason they aren't extinct is because we cage the few that are alive.
Evolution is a bitch. They *may* be intelligent, but we are much more intelligent and sophisticated.
Good post anon 5:06. And you forgot to mention how those filthy British gave smallpox infected blankets to the indians.
DeleteI am hoping that if the Sykes study verifies the species beyond any rational doubt, that the government will implement protocols to put a squatch in every zoo in the country. My ultimate dream would be to have squatches domesticated as pets. A bigfoot buddy for every American citizen? YES WE CAN!
DeleteRemember, You ARE Sasquatch.
DeleteFB/FB
burp
Maybe would could get a female squatch in every strip bar. They could put on a twerk show with ther're giant saggy diaper butts.
Delete^ here we go with the Paraphilic infantilism guys on diaper duty
DeleteAnon 5:06...
DeleteFor a creature to have evaded us this well for this long, it would have had to have evolved way longer than us and require to not worry at all whatever we could do to it.
Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock....
Scared?
Anon 4:45...
You see, Sykes will only be as good as his samples. It will have no baring on ten thousand years of acknowledgement of this creature and the the tens of thousands, maybe millions world wide who have seen one. We can't lose.
Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock....
Scared?
Peace.
Joe' s trippin' again...
DeleteJoe' s trippin' again...
DeleteYes Joe is always trippin ... trippin on pwnd crybaby skeptards and gay for Joe guys that he bitch slaps on a daily basis
DeleteYou have to also consider the subtleties of whether or not or to what degree our laws apply to a human species beneath sapiens. What if they kill a camper or someone hunting them? What of they kill sheep or steal property???
ReplyDeleteWhat if they capture you and taterhole you silly rotten?
DeleteWith a name like Uncle Tancred,he would love a good taterholing.
DeleteWould bestiality laws apply to squatches?
Deletewith a brave name like Anonymous I'm guessing you like to give and recieve. Doesnt take these things long to go to shit with these commentaters on this otherwise interesting blog.
Delete98 blokes in a suit in the woods, 98 blokes in a suit. You take one out, blow his brains out. 97 blokes in a suit in the woods.
ReplyDeleteThere will be no revelation from Sykes. His study will not matter as it has been rendered moot by Rick Dyers releasing the Hank video. This was done hastily to prempt anything Sykes may have come up with.
ReplyDeleteComing up on Bigfoot News 9/12/2013:
DeleteA possible explanation for Rick Dyer releasing the Hank video and the haters reaction to this stunning turn of events.
Film @11
Really..Who would give a rats ass for some geeky paper when they can go poke the goddam thing with a stick..I'm going to put my hand in Hanks mouth and my brother will take a picture..It will look like he is biting me..hahaha...
Delete^ the gay for Hank guy
DeleteRobert Lindsay is an American hero!
ReplyDeleteNo Bigfoot east of the rocky mountains.
ReplyDeleteThat's not true. I know they pass through Nassau County on their way to the Adironacks.
DeleteNo bigfoot east of the pacific ocean.
DeleteNo Bigfoot in the Pacific Ocean.
Delete"not in so many words".thats the get out clause right thee for him.just another sensationlized headline from some tool trying to make a name forhimself over te magic monkey
ReplyDeleteye right there are 8ft 600pd apemen roaming the north americal countryside completely evading being photoied. a body ever turning up, a group of people seeing the same thing etc..basicaly theres neer been a decent ohot/film/body ever. thats impossible
Lindsay's 'sources' also told him that Hank Williams Jr. was that 'so and so blankity blank's anonymous investor. Similar 'sources' intimated the same 'information' to Christopher Noel. This proved to be an outright lie. When this fabrication was proven beyond all doubt to be just that - an outright lie - Lindsay and Noel's 'sources' changed their story and said, 'Oops - we made a mistake. Actually 'so and so blankity blank's anonymous investor is Hank III. This fabrication was proven beyond all doubt to be nothing but an outright lie as well. This is just one of numerous examples of how useless and utterly unreliable these 'sources' are. Why anyone would lend even a shred of credence to anything these gentlemen and their 'inside anonymous' say is beyond me: Their 'scoops' are nothing but pure bunk. Professor Sykes' findings will follow standard protocol - they'll have to be replicable and peer reviewed to be recognized in the scientific community. If his study passes the test, his findings will be announced with a respectable press conference - not by Lindsay's 'anonymous inside sources'.
ReplyDelete^ This.
ReplyDelete^ That
DeleteLindsay has a sick view of the world and most of its people. He hates the world he's forced to live in, a world that won't elevate him for his superior gifts and instead forces him to live in poverty.
ReplyDeleteHe stated the other day he believes he deserves some fame for breaking the Dyer story. He is the classic example of a person who is desperate for his world to change and wants Bigfoot to do it for him. That's why he comes off as so irrational, lazy, and imprecise.
He is bad for Bigfooting.
Yeah, Lindsay will say anything just to get some attention and then when the truth comes out he's already moved on to something else.
DeleteHe's just lonely. :(
^ the gay for Lindsay guy
DeleteEveryone Lindsay quotes is his 'friend' >> sad
Delete^ the gay for Lindsay guy
DeleteLOL. Noel does the same thing..every person he knows is his good friend. Maybe Sykes can do his next study on these two hominids.
Delete^ This.
ReplyDelete^ That
Delete^ This.
ReplyDelete^ That
DeleteDyer announced his DVD of a dead Bigfoot was for sale just a day or so after Lindsay "broke" that Dyer had a video of his dead Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteIt's classic Dyer...taking something he hears and making it part of his story. There was an old Batman episode where Penguin planted a bug so he could hear what Batman thought Penguin was going to do next, and then he did it...letting Batman plan his crimes for him. It's not the first time Dyer has reminded me of a Batman villain.
^^^^ And Lindsay is pwned by multiple commenters! He won't show his face again here any time soon!!
ReplyDeleteLol @ all the above
ReplyDeleteSo much drama but no bigfoot ever
Lol thats pretty funny lady
DeleteThe other day Lindsay said he kind of admired the guy who kidnapped the three women because he could have a four-way every day. Then he said he once did it with a woman whose two dogs were jumping on the bed and wondered if that compared.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't be admitting that I'm in this guy's rolodex.
^ the gay for Lindsay guy
Delete8:07 Lol thats pretty funny lady
Delete