Watch: The Town That Bigfoot Built [Free Documentary]
A documentary about the small town of Honobia, OK, a mountain community that has created an economy based around the most famous mythical creature to ever possibly exist.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
A dingo took me baby
ReplyDeleteSo the feds and hundreds of local law enforcement searched an area intensely looking for James Lee DiMaggio and Hanna Anderson not long ago. This is also an area with a large history of sightings. They used aerial infrared and night vision equipment,the top of the line. They were searching desperately for any human looking figure/s in those woods. And yet not one bigfoot was found.
ReplyDeleteWhy?
Game set and match joe.
Joe is constantly getting pwned on this site. I'm starting to feel bad for the guy but he is a brit so... You know, the same people that tried to engage in gorilla warfare wearing bright red coats.
DeleteSmart.
DeleteHA HA HA HA!
DeleteNow I have no intention of bringing up a war from so long ago, especially when I have so many American friends, and especially whereas my mindset is that that you were entitled to your independance, but weren't you given the biggest handouts by the French? And didn't you get your arsses whooped everytime you wore those navy blue coats??
Right, for starters if you have the frequency of people suggested making all that noise out there in the wilderness, do you honestly thing for a second that the most elusive creature on the planet is gonna hang about for it to be seen? Do you really, genuinely lack the mental capacity and imagination that much, that you think after all this time, something that has been conducted hundreds of times would have caught them out? These creatures are very happy to become migratory when necessary and do so very often in order to maintain safety.
Oh dear guys, this is getting pretty bad. Is this honestly your idea of getting the better of enthusiasts? You people splurt out anything you can, regardless of the easiest most obvious answer being there in front of your eyes and then you have the stupid little pwned vulture to back up your weightless comments for a moment's worth of endorphin release... Until I come along and put you all in your vulnerable little places.
Bring it on guys... I can go all day.
Peace.
So basically you have no good reason why bigfoot has not been found.
DeleteAre you shitting me? Can't you read properly or something?? I suggest you go and get your mother to read for you, that is, if she's not too busy fixing your cookies and milk?
DeleteYou have a creature with animalistic sensory attributes, has evolved animalistic bodily features and has all the evasive intelligence and social bonds as a human... Do you think that those search parties came across much of anything alive, let alone something as intelligent, something that has evolved to evade us for it's safety, as a Bigfoot??
Peace.
Pwned again joe, pwned again
DeleteGet some new material you silly boy, it's not even relevant to schooling I'm dishing out.
DeleteJoe, why is it so hard for you to except the opinions of others? You must be a very insecure individual.... with bad teeth.
DeleteI just saw joe on my son's harry potter forum arguing that harry was a real person.
DeleteWho would win a fight between bigfoot and austin powers?
DeleteI have no problem with accepting other people's opinion's, if only they were constructive. Take a look at my friend JD for example... one who sits on the fence, calls out BS when he sees it but is also open minded enough to acknowledge evidence and testimony when it's presented and not deny it's there. This is the scientific method you see, to ask questions as opposed to denying it... but you people are continuing to call out the existence of this creature on a Bigfoot blog, and are using the most child-minded of means in the process.
DeleteIf you cannot take, or understand the fundamentals of a discussion/debate blog, then go back to your internet social group message boards or something, cause as long as there are ignorant people posting on this blog, I am going to defend the hard work, dedication and sacrifice researchers have put into this subject for decades and decades...
You dig?
And to articulate the point I was trying to make; just look at Anon 4:27's comment...
Point made.
*accept
DeleteWhat exactly?
DeleteJoe why is it so hard to accept that people really don't think bigfoot exists. A lot of these people are highly intelligent scientists. As it stands there is no evidence of this creature. If there was it would be accepted by science. You can't argue against that because that is how it is.
DeleteYou have alot of stories and what not but no hard evidence.
There are also a lot of scientists in there respective fields that have applied their research techniques and have come to conclusion that this creature is a reality. Why not listen to these people? With the wider scientific dogma surrounding this subject, along with the wider negative agendas, people like you cannot perceive our researchers as a pioneers as opposed to a loan theorists. All research fields have started off with one person, and in recent times since the change of mindset about what this creature actually is, you will not find people who have applied their research methods and have come to any other conclusion that this creature is a reality. No mainstream science would give this subject the first bit of legitimate time so people like you use that to their advantage to claim it can't stand up without backing. Well I say you can't get anymore experienced in Sykes' field so find someone to prove him wrong by the end of the year.
DeleteWhat people think doesn't concern me but you come on here and voice your ignorance and then ask why I react? If you really don't think this subject credible, f**k off and find something else to troll. You are ignorant and scared of the unknown and we'll see how much your mainstream science can laugh at this subject come the end of the year. Science is asking the questions and in your effort to ridicule this subject on here, you don't see that.
No evidence? We have DNA, dermals attained 40-50 miles into wilderness areas, a transcribed complex dialect, many wildlife biologists one of which an ex-advisor to the UN, ten thousand years of native culture along with a transition into a 100 years of printed media... tens of thousands of eyewitness testimony some of which multiple person... and two video footages in Patty and Leaping Yeti, all of this in it's accumulation means that the creature, a creature that buries it's dead is real to the people that are willing to acknowledge the evidence for what it is.
If you can't get your head around that, then go find something else to do, but don't use mainstream science as an example of acknowledgment cause it has done everything it can to ignore and censor this subject while it can.
Sykes is coming though.
These clowns must be on a 5 buck bonus today.
DeleteThe skeptard logic is becoming more frayed by the day.
Yesterday we had shoulder pads and alien autopsies.
Today we have Fed's disproving Bigfoot by searching a single small wooded area.
These guys then have the nerve to claim they 'pwn'.
Sharon is gonna be mad. No 5 bucks for the village idiot this week.
MMG
Chelsea Manning !!
DeleteWill you claim that Sykes has 'no evidence' at the end of the year or will or man up and accept that there is something to this subject?
DeleteYou people are the cancer of anthropological science and you people would have gladly held back the discoveries of the Bili Ape, the giant squid and the panda. All these discoveries started off with a bunch of people that listened to the evidence, the proper scientific method... And asked questions.
And you want to use science as your main weapon against this subject? It is human nature to demand answers, but we live in an age where people will do anything to bypass that obstacle for piece of mind on the unknown, because the unknown unsettles our narcissism as a race, to the lengths that they will just deny it's there if it means us digging a little deeper than usual to attain such answers.
You fall under that bracket and I suggest you start getting creative, cause by the end of the year your extreme narcissistic denial factor will have to subside to get creative when one of the most credible people in science tells you that YOU ARE WRONG.
Yawn.
DeleteSuch a dreamer joe.
Citing discoverys of other animals is such a fail.
All you are saying is that bigfoot should have been found. Yet it hasn't.
Yawn.
DeleteSuch a numb but Anon.
Siting discoveries of other animals proves my point that persavearing has come up with major discoveries. It took 60 years to discover the panda, and they gave up after 30 only to resume after stumbling across a panda skin in a temple. The Bili Ape, the indegenous people's of the Congo were told by Western scientists they were not seeing what they claimed to have seen, until guess what? The giant squid? Well I don't need to tell you how long that was scoffed at.
You see, if you don't have the intelligence of understanding of cryptozoology to follow my points I'm trying to make, then I simply suggest you go somewhere else. Why waste your time here? That's unless... You're actually learning something, which is why I suspect you prioritise your time coming here for a schooling every day of your life.
One problem I see is that if bigfoots are highly intelligent, they would be social like humans, dolphins, apes and things like that. Now, if they are social, meaning they hang out together, shouldn't they be easier to find?..I would think a group of 15-20 would make some noise..not to mention a mess..lol..
DeleteIt would actually mean they would be harder to find, as their evasion techniques would depend on each other and also complement each other
DeletePeace.
Social bonds attributed to higher intelligence on par with us would also explain the lack of biological evidence, for example, if one of these creatures were to be shot it would then be recovered prior to it being collected by the shooter, also higher intellectual social & family bonds means some level of culture and therefore burying of their dead.
DeletePeace.
So deluded joe
DeleteCounter my points or suck it up you pathetic troll.
DeleteWhat points? You have made no valid points to support your belief. If there is a peer reviewed paper describing a new species known as bigfoot then please provide a link and I will take a look.
DeletePeace.
http://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/dna-study-update-david-h-swenson-phd.html
Delete... Oh and Sykes is coming, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!
Peace.
He was interviewed on joe rogans show he said there was still no proof.
DeleteWell you have it in black white there in front you claiming the contrary.
DeleteSuck it up.
Todd disotell a dna expert also states there has been no bigfoot dna and the paper proved nothing
Delete“There is an unknown animal that appears to be some kind of a hybrid between a human and something else," Dr. Swenson said.
Delete“You read this DNA sequencing and you’re like, this could be a real animal?” Rogan asked him. Swenson was fairly certain that DNA that complete and complex could not be faked.
... From Joe Rogan's show.
Peace.
Watch joe rogan questions everything episode 1 on bigfoot. He speaks to dna experts and they say bigfoot is nonsense. Like you always say joe let's listen to the experts.
DeleteIts not faked.. just interpreted wrong. Scientists have looked at it and interpreted it correctly. No bigfoot found.
DeleteWhat, listen to the experts that either state that the DNA findings were contaminated... Not considering that these creatures are part human anyway, or the experts that expect this creature to be a bipedal gorilla? Bollocks... Melba didn't have a chance and didn't have the credibility to pull it off. Sykes' results will show the same and no list of censorious 'professionals' will be able to condemn it.
DeletePeace.
No use of the word 'Bigfoot', no... But the use of 'some kind of a hybrid between a human and something else'... Which is exactly what Bigfoot is.
Delete(Sigh)
Wow just wow.
DeleteYou think you have seen something in melbas data that real scientists have missed... lol
Melbas data has been thoroughly dealt with and there is no bigfoot to be found. I thought even footers accepted melba came up with nothing. Joe is a next level footer.
Hey Joe, hope you enjoyed your festival, was having a nosey online at the page for it, looks good. If your ever up this way early summer id recommend the knockengorroch festival, its not huge but its always a great atmosphere.
DeleteI'm liking the human theory more now, its certainly more possible than a non human ape. Bipedal, in line foot and intelligence would have to be a huge coincidence for it not to be a type of human. Is there enough food to support a large primate, is the same question as, is there enough food for a survival knowledgeable person to support themselves. I'd say yes, plus the wild tribe would have even more experience and knowledge on wild living. I'm big and hairy, my friend is not, if we were living wild on a freezing cold night, he would die first, i would live on and breed. Run that over a few generations. Bigfoot ;)
Been checking out 411, mostly hearing UFO abductions and little white aliens haha. But theres a map showing the last known locations of the missing people and it shows an amazing similarity to the maps showing bigfoot sightings. Coincidence?
GT
No... 'Real scientists' did exactly what I explained they did in my past comment and the final nail for her was the way in which she conducted herself afterwards, which is what lost most footers, including myself... It also upset many in the field that are still of the belief that this creature is a bipedal gorilla. But her research stands up unless you cannot associate her findings with what this creature actually is.
DeleteYou are a low level reader if you didn't pick that up in my previous comment.
Joe she had no bigfoot samples. 100 samples of nothing and you like it.
DeleteSeriously Joe
DeleteDon't let some little punk jack you up
Fuck em
Hey GT!!
DeleteMan the festival was great and it stayed dry so that was something! I'll keep an eye out for that festival you recommended man, thank you for that... and if you ever want to pop down this way for next year, just say the word bro!
Anyway... There is plenty of food for these creatures to survive on. My very good friend John Jones, who is a top, top researcher with many decades of hunting and trapping experience would be perfect in this comment section now, as he once explained to me the amount of vegetation and berries that are available year round. Now, one thing that many researchers consider, is that as deer numbers are increasing across the States, that this creature is being seen more often. Coincidence? Also, in Alaska and the pacific northwest, the Bigfoot are seen very regularly seen fishing by hand.
I am actually of the belief that the diet of these creatures varies with some being carnivorous, other being omnivorous and other herbivorous... but this is open as wide as possible to debate and one I am very keen to open with enthusiasts whenever possible.
John, if you're reading... Your input would be appreciated right now.
Peace GT.
MMG that was a great comment, about the skeptards' attempts at logic getting more frayed every day.
DeleteOne of the recent rock-bottoms of skeptardical sallies was that muscle, tendon, and flesh and mass movement you see in the individual in the PGF was simulated by the insertion of "water filled sacks."
They seem to be on their knees gasping for breath, so weak are these attempts.
The prehensile fingers revealed in frames 61 and 72 have thrown them for a loop, because they have been claiming "arm extensions" for years, and the moving fingers make this assertion so unlikely as to be frankly impossible.
Skeptards are wedded to the arm extension theory, they painted themselves into a corner, and they have hoisted themselves with their own petards via the fact of the curling moving fingers of the right hand.
They cooked their own goose with that one.
The skeptardical JREFing way to debate is to avoid a fact by changing the subject. That obviously doesn't demonstrate the logic they profess to use. It demonstrates weakness, that they have no argument for the point/fact at hand.
I guess you mean Sharon Shill, who rakes bucks in off of bigfoot's back.
Thanks Joe..Well, I suppose an intelligent species would carry off their wounded or dead..Not sure how they would coordinate evasion techniques..It should be easier for a solitary individual to split after erasing any signs than it would be for a large group to disperse and cover up signs on short notice...
DeleteAnother problem is that if they are intelligent enough to willfully avoid detection and capable of creating tactics to achieve that goal, they should have the brains to come up tools if not fire..Nothing like that has been found...
Fire equals human attention which in turn equals contact which is the last thing thing a BF would wish for.
DeleteBut being a Bigfoot 'expert' you knew that already huh?
Frayed indeed Urthu...
MMG
Not if you have evolved a fundamental requirement of safety to do so, it would come very natural for you then.
DeleteAccording to Native American legends these creatures understand how to even use fire and have used various tools over the ages such as primitive forms of baskets and sharpened sticks to spear fish. Jim Vieira has come across the documentation of countless native American burial mounds that have uncovered giant skeletons with giant tools and sometimes even weapons. The When considering the Australian Yowie (and I use this creature in comparison as I firmly believe I am talking about the exact same creature), there is a fascinating account of 'The Wildman of Monaro' (you can find this in Google Image Search) that tells of a sighting of a gorilla-type being holding what appeared to be a nulla-nulla; this is an Aboriginal war/hunting club. Furthermore; the images of Medieval European Woodwose almost always portray these beings as possessing a large stick-like club. You can check this out on Google Image Search, where you will see these creatures often fighting knights in shining armour,
Here is an account by D L Soucy of a Bigfoot in the Grand Canyon that uses a giant club, it's very fascinating I feel. It won't take too much of your time...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izmGdRWYbmI
The image of a Bigfoot with a giant club is so cool to me, what an intimidating sight that would be to see something like that step out of the brush... Terrifying no doubt.
Peace.
damn..... a lot of pwned footers here today desperately trying to justify there belief in something that doesn't exist
Deleteshits hilarious
rick you so funny
DeleteFor the original poster, surely you realize by now after pasting this comment over and over that the massive search effort did not find any bigfoot, nor did it find the people they were looking for who we know were in the area. A couple people on horseback spotted them and reported it after they got back when they realized who they were. Good thing the police aren't a bunch of skeptards or they would've said it was a misidentification and they never would have rescued that girl. I believe you are aware of the details of this incident and twisting the facts just makes you look desperate. I apologize if you are simply ignorant.
DeleteMMG, I checked my post and don't see where I claimed to be an expert on bigfoots...Joe, thanks for the response..
DeleteThere's no money in bigfooting.
ReplyDeleteTell that to Moneymaker and the producers of Finding Bigfoot. You go to work each day, and he goes out in the woods and makes squatch calls. Moneymaker probably makes more money than you doing it.
DeleteI am a cryptotaterholeologist...I do it for pleasure..Money is not everything...
DeleteTell that to a woman
DeleteThere is however a monkey in bigfooting.
DeleteTommy Tommy,you're failing on your rhyming game dude.What gives?Not enough taterhole?
DeleteTommy that didn't rhyme
Delete^ lame
ReplyDelete^^ responding to yourself is f***ing lame
Stand in lame guy
^^lame. Stand in lame guy is lame.
Delete^ lame
DeleteTaterhole. O.k. I have got that out of my system.
ReplyDeleteAre you sure?
Deleteis it Honobia twinned with Homofobia in Russia?
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
DeleteHey Joe, in the Patterson timeline, do you know when Roger Patterson appeared on both the Merv Griffin and Joey Bishop TV shows to show and discuss his film? Do you have any information about these TV appearances?
ReplyDeleteI know these appearances were both some time late 67/early 68. I would pay money to see these TV appearances by Patterson. They would be very interesting to the bigfoot enthusiast, very interesting indeed.
Unfortunately, it is my understanding that the episodes of these TV shows with the appearances by Roger Patterson are not available to the general public. I don't know if that is correct or not. I hope that someone finds these and makes them available to the public or puts them on Youtube if they already have them.
Munns could probably get hold of them but it would show what a huckster roger was so he has no interest in doing that
DeleteHello my friend.
DeleteI was not aware of these TV appearances, but if I'm completely honest, I knew very little of the events surrounding the capturing of the footage in 67 and until very recently and have deliberately ignored it for a long time for the sole reason that it can never be proven. But those TV appearances are very interesting and I would love to see them.
If anyone reading this comment knows of where to find these pieces of film... drop us a comment.
Peace.
Wow, just wow.
Delete^^^ Is that all you got?
DeleteAs long as the disinformation machine keeps grinding right?
Not that a pawn like yourself will be in the loop.
Your job is to spam. Shit job but some low life has to do it.
MMG
Yes find those TV appearances the subect them to voice stress analysis and a micro facial expression expert and maybe this would shed light on Mr.Pattersons truthfullness or lack there of. J.D.
DeleteThey may not exist: Back in the day, they only recorded a live telecast if they needed to show it at a certain hour in another time zone...I Love Lucy in the late 50's and the Honeymooners are early examples: They recorded performances that were televised live to NY audiences so they can show them later in Cal..We do not have any Milton Berle episodes because they were not recorded. If these talks shows Roger appeared on in the 60's were live, it is possible they were not recorded....
DeleteArgh yes, quite right... Also, when did archiving programmes actually come into play?
DeletePeace.
..Not sure Joe, but I'd bet when it first came in they only did it for bigger budget TV shows and maybe nationwide newscasts..
DeleteI don't know about the Joey Bishop Show, but I do believe that the Merv Griffin shows were taped. So, there is the possibility that Roger Patterson's appearance on the Merv Griffin show may exist somewhere.
Delete..I agree. I think Merv griffin was taped and the question is whether or not the film is still around..
DeleteThis DVD set available on Amazon contains selected episodes of the Merv Griffin show going back to 1962. So, a later 1967 episode with Roger Patterson is likely still around somewhere. We NEED TO FIND IT!!!!
Deletehttp://www.amazon.com/Merv-Griffin-Show-Interesting-People/dp/B000BF2KH0/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1377296708&sr=1-1&keywords=merv+griffin
I don't know if the information is correct or not, but according to what I found on Google, Roger Patterson did appear as a guest on the Merv Griffin Show. However, it was not in late 1967 or early 1968, it was on October 5, 1970. Patterson appeared with Dr. Grover Krantz, and they showed and discussed the footage that Patterson shot. Man, I would love to see a clip of Patterson's Merv Griffin show appearance.
DeleteIf Patterson hoaxed the PGF, he had a lot of guts and must have been a good actor (faker) to be a guest on TV talk shows presenting and talking about his footage.
DeleteSomebody please find these clips!!!
According to this page, Roger Patterson appeared on season 2 of the Joey Bishop talk show on January 29, 1968:
Deletehttp://www.tv.com/shows/the-joey-bishop-show/january-29-1968-1375943/
Find them!!! Some one find these clips!!!
DeleteWow..Even if Roger's appearance did not make it to the DVD, the footage still exists..I doubt they selected certain segments and episodes and then tossed out the film. Maybe Bill Munns who is trying to make a doc about Roger and the PGF will end up getting his hands on these interviews...
DeleteGreat story. Guy was in a cabin and saw bigfoot. He shot at him and accidentally burned the cabin down. Then he wrecked his pick-up trying to get away.
ReplyDeleteI think that was one of those bigfoots that likes to hide in the bottom of a whiskey bottle and only comes out when it has been completely emptied.
I am Chelsea Manning .
ReplyDeleteNot the best thing to say before you go to jail for 25 yrs.
His tater is going to get a whole lot of holing
True dat.True dat.
DeleteLMAO......
Unless that's what's he/she is looking for.
By the way,I would like to hear Evas take on this.;-)
Hello The True Dat Guy you cheeky monkey.Ok my take on this is that Miss Manning has Gender Dysphoria,previously known as Gender Identity Disorder,the lastest medical discoveries suggest that during fetal development a hormonal inbalance which appears to have a genetic cause may cause the individual to end up with a brain sex different to the body,it's worth remembering of course that who you are is between your ears,not your legs,It's accepted in medical circles that the only successful treatment for people with GD is hormone therapy and surgery to bring the body in line with the persons identity,i have no idea weather Miss Mannings tater will get a whole lot of holing or if that's what she wants,i think i've covered most of it,Wikipedia has some good info on it,i thankyou for your time!oh just wondering, whats LMAO? xx
Delete"i have no idea weather Miss Mannings tater will get a whole lot of holing or if that's what she wants"
DeleteBrilliant, Laughing My Ass Off!
""i have no idea weather Miss Mannings tater will get a whole lot of holing or if that's what she wants"
DeleteIsn't that the 'END' game for 'Miss Mannings' Taterhole is to be pummeled?
This is what he strives for,isn't it?
How does it make you feel Eva when a big strong man pummels your taterhole? Elated?
Hello Anon 10:17,Gender Identity and sexuality are two different things,Miss Mannings may identify as female but may or may not be attracted to men so i don't know what her END game is and no ones been in my taterhole xx
DeleteYea,RRIIIGGGGHHHHHTTTTTT!!!!!!!
DeleteRush=Eva..
That's not true Eva.Don't forget the night behind Red Lobsters dumpster.You old catty dog.
DeleteYou promised you wouldn't tell,and if you don't mind,less of the old and less of the dog xx
Delete"Hello The True Dat Guy you cheeky monkey.Ok my take on this is that Miss Manning has Gender Dysphoria,previously known as Gender Identity Disorder,the lastest medical discoveries suggest that during fetal development a hormonal inbalance which appears to have a genetic cause may cause the individual to end up with a brain sex different to the body,it's worth remembering of course that who you are is between your ears,not your legs,It's accepted in medical circles that the only successful treatment for people with GD is hormone therapy and surgery to bring the body in line with the persons identity,i have no idea weather Miss Mannings tater will get a whole lot of holing or if that's what she wants,i think i've covered most of it,Wikipedia has some good info on it,i thankyou for your time!oh just wondering, whats LMAO? xx
DeleteYou sure do know a lot about taterholing.Just saying...
No probs Eva.Just wanted to get your take on all this taterholing....
Ps.LMAO??
DeleteWow,just wow.
Go troll another site.
Better yet,stay and enjoy cause I can see who you really are.And you are not Eva Rodgers.....
Sincerely,The True Dat Guy.....
Thats ok xx
DeleteI am Eva Rogers,why do think im not?xx
DeleteI've just realized what LMAO means,silly me xx
DeleteMMG you okay buddy? You seem to be quite angry today? Hope your ok man. Don't let bigfoot not existing upset you. It's a wonderful world out there even without your magical monkey man.
ReplyDeletePeace
:)
How about you actually try and prove it doesn't exist for once eh? Until you bring something more than 'duh, duh, blah, blah, opinion' to the table, you'll continue to get your arss handed to you.
DeleteSuck it up troll.
Joe you can not prove bigfoot doesnt exist. What a complete dumbass. You can not prove a negative.
DeleteBy your logic the flying spaghetti monster is real by you can't prove that don't exist. Hell its a free for all. Unicorns, dog man, fairies, santa clause its all real folks. Joe has spoken. Alleluja praise the Lord.
A negative? Oh dear... A negative would imply that your claim that this creature is not real is the truth, yes? I can't tell whether you're ignorant or stupid... Probably both. In the face of mounding evidence in support of this creature, you do have to prove it is all wrong. You cannot counter research with anything other than research.
DeleteDumbass, Ha!
All your fictitious characters are sweet, but none of them are being taken seriously by science. I wonder if you'll still use those examples come the end of the year?
Dumbass.
It amazes me that you do not understand simple concepts joe.
DeleteYou ask me to prove bigfoot don't exist. It can't be done. You can not prove a negative. All those other imaginery creatures are no different. You can not prove they dont exist either. You have dug yourself into a hole here I suggest you admit you can't prove bigfoot dont exist before making yourself look any more stupid.
Actually, if those imaginary creatures had things like this to support it...
Deletehttp://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/dna-study-update-david-h-swenson-phd.html
... Then that claim could be made. But they haven't. And like I said, Bigfoot is not a negative because it has evidence to promote and support it... You see how that works? Shall I spell it out for you?? Counter us with something more than simply denying it's there, and maybe we can have some sort of exchange that would lend some resemblance of a debate...
Ok??
Facepalm^
DeleteDuh?
DeleteKeep digging that hole joe!
DeleteRead and learn... You may actually get somewhere.
DeleteI see you enjoy reading fiction joe...
Delete9:19 just read Justin Bieber autobiograghy
DeleteHA HA 9:19 is a chimo
DeleteHey Joe and co! Some people just have diarrhea at both ends. You're right, Sykes is your cut man in the corner.
ReplyDeleteHey Skunkey bro!
DeletePeace.
Hi Joe, Thanks for the earlier mention of me. Lets look at the search for extraterrestial life. Look at the enourmous amount of money being spent for the seti project. The radio telescope arrays and facilities associated with them must be worth billions of dollars. In all those years they have exactly one signal that they call the "wow!" signal. And yet with all that effort and money for so little return they continue the search. So to the skeptics I would say draw a comparison between One WOW signal and the evidence that exists for bigfoot. I contend there is more evidence on the bigfoot side of the scale. If your not looking for something you aren't going to find something. Such as myself. I never purchase lottery tickets therefore I will never win the lottery. But I sure do not deride the millions of people who do buy tickets. Even though the odds are incredibly stacked against them. J.D.
DeleteOh JD... Again, what a profound comment!
DeleteHA HA HA!!
Man, it's always brilliant to see you comment, I've learnt a lot from you my friend.
I think that if there was more of an effort to ask the questions, then this subject could have been put to bed much much sooner. Like I suggested previously in this comment section, we as a human race base much of our understanding of the universe around us from what we understand of our current means of determination.
If this subject didn't hold so much ridicule, then think how much further into getting to the bottom of it we'd be if more and more people came forward and lent their experiences and understanding?
I am starting to wonder though, that if there is a cover-up (which I feel there undoubtedly is) then is this cover-up actually for the right reasons? Maybe these people actually understand more than the rest of us that these creatures need to be left alone and remain in the realms of wonder?? I don't know, but that's all I know, is that the subject absolutely fascinates me. The stealth and evasion abilities of this creature must be of the highest, highest level... Navy Seals would give ANYTHING to have the skills of these creatures.
Well and truly; the boss of the woods.
Peace JD.
Indians lie on bigfoot highway lying
ReplyDeleteHoaxers con the young childs fragile eggshell mind...
That was actually quite funny.
Deletejoe is pwned
DeleteHELP!!!!!Me and Dick Ryder are are stuck like two dogs humping!!!!
ReplyDeleteNever mind,it's starting to feel good.
Bottom line is, that in order to be a CREDIBLE skeptic on the subject of bigfoot being nonexistent you have to have done FIELD RESEARCH...I am not talking about a weekend or two once a year either. It takes months and even years of painstaking work in the field. If you havent done that, your opinions and arguments dont amount to jack sh**... Any scientific researcher with an ounce of common sense will tell you the same thing.
ReplyDeleteBottom line is, that in order to be a CREDIBLE skeptic on the subject of bigfoot being nonexistent you have to have done FIELD RESEARCH...I am not talking about a weekend or two once a year either. It takes months and even years of painstaking work in the field. If you havent done that, your opinions and arguments dont amount to jack sh**... Any scientific researcher with an ounce of common sense will tell you the same thing.
ReplyDeleteGood post sir!!!
DeletePeace bro!