This Guy's Sighting Would Have Been Believable If His Tracks Weren't So Big
If you're going to pass something off as real Bigfoot evidence, at least get the tracks right! A 30 inch footprint is just way too big. YouTube user Ryan J. claims it's all real though. Watch below:
Last!!!! I,m naked again?
ReplyDelete^thank you for the great representation of the last.
Deletefirst
ReplyDeletecrap lol
Delete^fantastic false first, congrats!!
DeleteLast!!!! I,m naked again?
ReplyDeleteMmg
ReplyDeleteWAY TO BIG..That thing would be as tall as the trees
ReplyDeleteFirsters lost their R....
ReplyDeleteThese pretzels are making me thirsty.
ReplyDeleteMaybe 30 centimeters (12 inches) ?
ReplyDeleteGuy's Sighting Would Have Been Believable If His Tracks Weren't So Big guy is one of the most credible voices in the bigfoot community.
ReplyDeleteWhere's Peacefoot and MysticalMonkeyGonad?
ReplyDeleteThe good thing about those blokes is that they have gonads. Good call. Now where are the gonads of 6:14? What a conundrum.
DeleteAye, how we pity the gonadless 6:14, wipe a tear, mate!
DeleteDamn, there sure are a lot of Brits on here. I don't blame you guys for wanting to stick together. Sasquatch is definitely cooler than the Loch Ness Monster.
DeleteOh, and by the way, nice use of "conundrum" sincerely.
DeleteMk davis revisits the personal problem of patty!!!!
ReplyDeleteIf the track hadn't been so big? WTF. The guy said he's only 5'4" so that's not all that big of a print. Could be real.
ReplyDeleteStill no proof!This is all a bullshit scam.
ReplyDeletewhy don't you cry about it lady
Delete5'4"........I crap bigger'n that.
ReplyDeletewe can smell you even here in Pa.
Delete