This Guy's Sighting Would Have Been Believable If His Tracks Weren't So Big


If you're going to pass something off as real Bigfoot evidence, at least get the tracks right! A 30 inch footprint is just way too big. YouTube user Ryan J. claims it's all real though. Watch below:



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. ^thank you for the great representation of the last.

      Delete
  2. WAY TO BIG..That thing would be as tall as the trees

    ReplyDelete
  3. These pretzels are making me thirsty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe 30 centimeters (12 inches) ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Guy's Sighting Would Have Been Believable If His Tracks Weren't So Big guy is one of the most credible voices in the bigfoot community.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Where's Peacefoot and MysticalMonkeyGonad?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The good thing about those blokes is that they have gonads. Good call. Now where are the gonads of 6:14? What a conundrum.

      Delete
    2. Aye, how we pity the gonadless 6:14, wipe a tear, mate!

      Delete
    3. Damn, there sure are a lot of Brits on here. I don't blame you guys for wanting to stick together. Sasquatch is definitely cooler than the Loch Ness Monster.

      Delete
    4. Oh, and by the way, nice use of "conundrum" sincerely.

      Delete
  7. Mk davis revisits the personal problem of patty!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. If the track hadn't been so big? WTF. The guy said he's only 5'4" so that's not all that big of a print. Could be real.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Still no proof!This is all a bullshit scam.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 5'4"........I crap bigger'n that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?