Don't Blame The "Newbies"


Editor’s Note: Dr. Matthew A. Johnson is one of the most credible people in the Bigfoot world. In July 1, 2000, Dr. Johnson had a "Class A" Bigfoot encounter with his family while hiking near the Oregon Caves. After his life changing sighting, he went to the public and described one of the most intense encounters ever. You can join him on Facebook at Team Squatchin USA.

Don’t blame the “Newbies” for Rick Dyer’s prolonged success with his latest hoax (“I shot Bigfoot and have the body”). They’re new to Bigfootdom. They didn’t know any better. That would be equivalent to blaming a child for not looking both ways before they cross the street or blaming the child for getting into a car because a stranger offered them candy. It’s not the child’s fault. Rather, it’s the parents’ fault for not teaching the child to be aware of the hazards of crossing the street or “Stranger Danger.”

Continue reading "Don't Blame The "Newbies"" at www.teamsquatchinusa.com

Comments

  1. Patty looking "good" is something you immediately come to understand as completely subjective once you step beyond the boundaries of mutual backpatting society in Bigfootery. Patty looks terrible to many people, including primatologists and award winning FX artists Chris Walas and Richard Smith.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All opinions are subjective you moron, you have no argument.

      this isnt about PGF, stop trolling

      Delete
    2. Joe's entire daily "debate" relies very heavily on the opinions of others...but nooooww all of a sudden they are subjective! Mmmhmmm

      different anon.

      Delete
    3. Joe got totally pwned in abstentia.

      Delete
    4. For Joe to get pwned he would actually have to be involved in the comments so nice try butt pirates

      Delete
  2. The Patty suit isn't good (per se) because it reveals itself as being a suit in various ways which have already been pointed out here. But for some reason it has fooled a tiny minority of the world.

    The PGF hoax is like many others in that it only requires a small percentage of believers to crank out a profit for the producer. More so, it continues to create profits for those who promote it. It's like Patterson lit a torch that is carried by a cult of weirdos. I think he recognized a society that had people who liked the idea of Bigfoot existing as a fantasy and he gave them what they wanted. But I don't think he was a believer. I think he knew better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The cult of 'wierdos'?

      This is posted by a JREF minion who just so happens to be a member of a 'cult'.

      Oh the irony...

      MMG



      Delete
    2. ouch feel that burn MMG

      no monkey man for you!!

      Delete
    3. ^^ No Sharon Shrill boobies for you!!

      MMG

      Delete
    4. MMG come on bro... a couple cowboy conmen filmed a bigfoot... come on MMG

      Delete
    5. Deluded, delusion, those are JREFing's favourite words. You could always try changing the record, but you have your talking points I suppose.

      No you see, there is some good evidence in the PGF. Your argument will step into the light of reality if you simply accept and include the good evidence in the PGF. Just drag and drop the good pieces of evidence from the PGF into the circle of inclusion of your argument, and you will have more credibility; you can then argue fairly and from an educated viewpoint.

      Most PGF enthusiasts recognise things aren't 100% either way, but expect you to include the obviously good evidence in your debate.

      The problem with PGF naysayers is they go 100% to the extreme, and deny and reject all, while most people interested in the PGF and open to possibilities recognise the good evidence in the film while accepting it can't go 100% in either direction.

      Bearing that in mind, it's clear that the JREFers require growth, an expansion of perception. This auto-jerk rejection of all and everything shows a weak position of argument. The fair-minded PGF-interested who accept some evidence while remaining sceptical of some things, are in a strong position of argument.

      Why on Earth would you insist on being perpetually in a weak, defective, incomplete position, on shifting sands, forever wobbling and attempting to self-correct?

      The auto-jerk rejection demonstrates a mental condition, the definition of which is dear to the hearts of you and all JREFers:

      Deluded.

      Delete
    6. there is no good "evidence" in the pgf... and lets not even get into the fact that there is no bigfoot, anywhere, ever

      no evidence is as clear as day

      there is absolutely no reason to think the pgf is real or to try find "proof" in the film. it looks like a man in a suit, it walks like a man in a suit, there is no evidence of a bigfoot, therefore it is a man in a suit

      Delete
    7. It's in my humble opinion that Roger and Al hoaxed Gimlin. It all starts to make sense, especially with the no shooting unless it charges us agreement, and it wouldn't surprise me if Roger snuck blank cartridges into Bob's ammo case/rifle before they even left for the Bluff Creek site.

      This leaves the perfect storm situation as Gimlin was none the wiser, Roger died a few years later, Al as the sole witness beside that old small town drunk with wild claims and absolutely no recollection of the suit or the exact site 'Bob Hieronomous' whom they completely ripped off.

      All those years of royalties and spins!

      Delete
    8. ^ you ever read what you write? its all nonsense and your opinion. you have nothing. claiming it is a diaper? Really? What evidence do we have to compare the PGF to? barely any, especially not pictures of a BF's ass. So how can you say that is abnormal?

      The reason to look at the film objectively is because we are not trying to make it real, we want answers just as much as a skeptic who claims to not care about BF. We are open to it being fake, with something to prove that of course. The film leaves none of us with any definitive answers. in the years since its filming, no person has ever come close to recreating what we see. Not even in hollywood.

      Delete
    9. It was a big, furry, itchy diaper. I wear them all the time.

      Delete
    10. 4:23..No offense, but you are not up to speed on the PGF, its history or the debate..There is NO chance that Gimlin was hoaxed: its real or he was in on it..This is one of the few points of agreement amongst all who have spent time researching the film...

      Delete
  3. But yet this is the expert. A former professional FX guy can't come up with better solutions to make fake breasts move than to use static materials. Why? Because they were available at the time? Was sand not available at the time? Or flour? Or oil? Or water? Isn't an FX artist supposed to be a natural improvisationalist? I could get two whoopie cushions, some lard and some fake fure and do better than that. You can't show that to anyone outside belief culture who's going to look at that and not see an experiment that was obviously designed to fail for the purpose of making believers nod and clap like trained seals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'I could get two whoopie cushions, some lard and some fake fure and do better than that'.

      I'm looking forward to you sending Shawn your version of the PGF. I'll bet your fake 'fure' suit will look just great.

      MMG

      Delete
    2. Deluded, delusion, those are JREFing's favourite words. You could always try changing the record, but you have your talking points I suppose.

      No you see, there is some good evidence in the PGF. Your argument will step into the light of reality if you simply accept and include the good evidence in the PGF. Just drag and drop the good pieces of evidence from the PGF into the circle of inclusion of your argument, and you will have more credibility; you can then argue fairly and from an educated viewpoint.

      Most PGF enthusiasts recognise things aren't 100% either way, but expect you to include the obviously good evidence in your debate.

      The problem with PGF naysayers is they go 100% to the extreme, and deny and reject all, while most people interested in the PGF and open to possibilities recognise the good evidence in the film while accepting it can't go 100% in either direction.

      Bearing that in mind, it's clear that the JREFers require growth, an expansion of perception. This auto-jerk rejection of all and everything shows a weak position of argument. The fair-minded PGF-interested who accept some evidence while remaining sceptical of some things, are in a strong position of argument.

      Why on Earth would you insist on being perpetually in a weak, defective, incomplete position, on shifting sands, forever wobbling and attempting to self-correct?

      The auto-jerk rejection demonstrates a mental condition, the definition of which is dear to the hearts of you and all JREFers:

      Deluded.

      Delete
    3. ^Deluded BFFer that payed his $30 like the good footer he is

      Delete
    4. Okay when some asshole just pops up out of the blue and wayyy off topic saying "Patty is a suit"... Don't fall into that trap. They don't care if Patty is a suit or not. If they did, they would have actually said these "points".

      They are Trolls, not Skeptics and they are diverting you from the major topic. For those of you who got diverted, the topic is; Why does the "Bigfoot's Cloak" guy think about giving candy to strange children?

      Delete
    5. So true Tzieth, its hard to stop people from feeding into it. I really dont post much because of the overwhelming amount of trolls this place has. It is probably just the same few people pretending to be as many people as possible which is expected when it is not required for people to login. Posting anonymously on this blog is not only bad for this place but bad for "bigfootdom"(I really dont like that term at all.)

      Delete
    6. Tzieth:

      Please explain the subducting thigh, the static diaper butt, the trackway film inconsistencies, and roger and bobs many contradictions.

      Delete
    7. Tzieth, is a known Liar.. I went to high school with the guy!

      Delete
    8. "AnonymousSunday, August 11, 2013 at 4:16:00 PM PDT

      Tzieth:

      Please explain the subducting thigh, the static diaper butt, the trackway film inconsistencies, and roger and bobs many contradictions."

      If you are seriously asking... Gladly

      A lot of these things you are speaking of were artifacts caused by copy after copy after copy of old film. As for the thigh,I am assuming you mean the bulge? Those who supported that it was real looked at that as an injury. However on the clean footage even that was not quite as huge as it looked. That "Diaper Butt" on the clean footage had a butt-crack. Though I do not think Sasquatch are Apes, if you are referring to the lack of sway in the but as it walks, simply look at that youtube footage of that gorilla that walks bipedal and it is the same thing going on with it's butt.

      As for any inconsistencies between Patterson and Gimlin, I would be far more suspicious if they had come up with the exact same story. Ask ten witnesses of the same incident and each one will tell you something different.

      Now as for this Ass-Clown ("AnonymousSunday, August 11, 2013 at 6:29:00 PM PDT

      Tzieth, is a known Liar.. I went to high school with the guy!)

      If you went to High School with me and you are still talking about high school over twenty years later, then there is no measure to how much of a loser you must be. But as I told you before, If you can't say what High school I even went to or when I graduated, you had better find some other tool in which to troll.

      Delete
    9. But stay in touch on my facebook page

      Delete
  4. 'Stranger Danger' was a term invented with Dr J in mind.

    Hilarious. This guy comments about Dyer when he promotes the bigfoot games he plays with his kids as the real deal.

    He's been smart enough to attempt to tap into the habituator community. These guys will buy anything. Especially if Chris Noel gives the moob-man his blessing.

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These guys will buy anything says the guy that bought the pgf hook line and sinker.

      Delete
    2. !AH, EM.! chris noel lost all of his credibility. as a man with huge cock!! and as a researcher!!..I WAS VERY DISSAPOINTED.... as always MELLISSA H,

      Delete
  5. Im a newbie,was interested in Bigfoot as a child, then Melbas news got me interested again..... Then i paid Todd Standing for his content.... :( I could cry....

    GT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. different decade same result: no monkey

      Delete
    2. Ill wait for Sykes, if he says : No monkey, ill be gone for another decade.

      GT

      Delete
    3. I already know he has no monkey:) stick around if you want but you will be disappointed again

      the only reason to stick around is for the lolz at the footers expense

      Delete
    4. So this monkey has had loads of money spent on him, 'experts' dedicating their lives and created communities.... I guess he is kind of magical, haha

      GT

      Delete
    5. ^ the only reason you're here is because you are afraid to admit you care/believe about the subject.

      No person who has no interest in the subject even knows this site exists. So dont lie, you're a sad sad troll with no balls.

      Delete
    6. a footer can not grasp the concept that it is possible to be interested in bigfoot and also know that bigfoot does not exist

      Delete
    7. you're interested in something you "know" doesnt exist?

      Really? Thats some logic

      Delete
    8. Sykes will only be as good as the samples he's provided.

      If the samples are BS then Sykes won't prove a damn thing.

      Thousands of eye-witness testimonies however cannot be disputed. One would have to say it would be 'unscientific' to claim that all of these accounts are fabricated or mistaken identity.

      MMG

      Delete
    9. it is a truelly fascinating psychologic phenomenon the bigfoot lark, and pretty fucking funny too!

      Delete
    10. yea you are in it for the psychologic phenomenon... whatever helps you sleep at night. Until you arent here trolling about BF, sadly, you care too much about something you claim doesnt even exist. That is sad on your part troll.

      Delete
    11. "Thousands of eye-witness testimonies however cannot be disputed. "

      WRONG.

      The plural of anecdote is not evidence.

      In fact the sheer number of sightings lends favour to bigfoot no being real. If this thing was being seen as often as people are claiming we would have a lot of real evidence of its existence. Instead we have absolutely nothing.

      Delete
    12. ^ You are so wrong. You're logic is bonkers.

      There are thousands of eyewitness accounts made by police, government employees, doctors, people with REAL things to lose. But what they saw was so impactful they spoke up about it. Many can be written off as misidenfications but you cannot write off EVERY SINGLE account of a bipedal hair covered man like creature bigger than anything else in the woods known to exist. People with real experience in the woods have been seeing these for decades and saying nothing out of fear of ridicule. WHO COULD BLAME THEM? With assholes like you with zero expertise saying they are wrong, why would they put themselves out there? Those that do get it so bad from asshats who have never even camped in the woods and seen the vast amount of land, resources and shelter for these creatures to roam and exist. If you think people would see them all the time, that is a silly opinion of a skeptic. People barely ever see them outside of the woods and when they do it is for a matter of seconds, a FLASH of a biped running across the road or hiding on the side because they know what we are DANGEROUS. They are smart and you cannot handle the idea of them existing so you dismiss it.

      You sir, are the one who is wrong. the sheer number of sighting lends favor to their existence, in no way does it do the opposite. Get some real logic in your head.

      Delete
    13. We have footprints. Lots of them.

      You are happy to dismiss all evidence because it does not fit with your stance on the subject. Therefore your views a deemed null and void.

      MMG

      Delete
    14. MMG which footprints to you include and exclude? because they certain aren't all from the same species.

      Delete
    15. ^ GREAT RESPONSE! *shakes head* there are many casts that cant be proven fake. many that can.

      But for those that cant be proven faked, what do you have to say? Nothing. You just care about the fake ones because it supports your idea of the creature not existing.

      Delete
    16. "cant be proved fake" so what? that doesn't mean its real

      you cant prove a negative dummy

      what you can do however, through no lack of trying of the bigfoot enthusiasts is to provide us with the bigfoot, hows that working out for you?

      Delete
    17. Correct.

      It's safe to say that Ray Wallace was not responsible for Meldrum's complete collection.

      MMG

      Delete
    18. The probabilities of such a creature existing without leaving any organic evidence are beyond astronomical.

      Where is there one molecule of evidence that could be sent to any university lab and be proven to be from some giant, hairy breasted primate that is roaming every state and province in North America?

      Delete
    19. Every state and province? You sure?

      Again prone to ridiculous exaggeration to attempt to prove your flimsy point.

      MMG

      Delete
    20. the irony of MMG using the word "ridiculous" :)

      Delete
    21. A toenail, a piece of shit, a convincing piece of film, let alone one of a sasquatch 'crabwalking across the highway farting the national anthem'?

      We'll settle for a drunken McDonald's spokesburger, drunk and bleeding and staring at his ceiling fan. That's really all we need.

      Delete
  6. RELAX folks.

    It turns out Dyer was playing a prank on Kulls and he was never going to meet him at the airport and show him the live bigfoot.

    Dyer will be revealing it soon, so no to worry folks. This is the real deal folks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HAHAHAHAHA


      I really hope you're not serious 3:37, NOTHING IS COMING

      Why does the date continue to get pushed back?

      Why did he "prank" the community he is apparently apart of? Its called a HOAX

      Delete
    2. He wants the body to be good and rotten, ready for the big reveal!

      Delete
    3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I_A3j5-ssE&feature=c4-overview&list=UU5IKbbFiho2jnnneClRUcnA

      Delete
    4. he put on the prank video 1/1/14 ... so yea almost a year and a half later ... he has nothing ... JayRodriguez

      Delete
    5. The young foots name is Joe Fitzgerald,Dyer shall teach him the queens english and make a gentleman of him,then they can go to scores together,pinkies out

      Delete
  7. Johnson is the exact danger newbies need to avoid. Johnson is the deluded nut luring newbies into his fantasy world while he warns newbies not to let any deluded nuts lure them in. It would be funny if it wasn't so obvious and painfully sad. And yet, so many can't see it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. are you saying theres no monkey???? I don't like that reality!!! I want there to be monkey man so I will believe Johnson cuz he makes the world seem more magical also that Patterson film must be real right cuz otherwise world is not magical anymore for me:(

      MMG

      Delete
    2. Are they all deluded nuts then? Meldrum? Melba? Moneymaker? The lot?

      Delete
    3. nope, the high ups in the footin world are not deluded, they know exactly whats going on, they are the ones running the dog and pony show, the deluded ones are the ones paying to go to conferences and paying for merchandise and casts etc, the easily gullible folks who want a magic monkey man in their life

      Delete
    4. the deluted ones are the ones who come here and pretend like they dont believe BF exists, youre here arent you? You know this site exists and all about the subject matter? Well then guess what, youre a "bleever"

      Delete
    5. I am a "newbie" and I would be lost without the guidance from this Doctor.

      Please listen to him people. He can do so much for our community.
      We simply MUST ban all talk about bigfoot bodies unless the person making such claim can provide the evidence that Dr. Johnson has laid the ground rules for.

      Delete
    6. dr johnson is as credible as rick dyer.

      Delete
    7. them trolls sure fear the mmg

      Delete
    8. Sure smells like that to me my friend.

      MMG

      Delete
    9. MMG has not presented one decent argument that could convince anyone bigfoot is real.

      Delete
    10. 4:11 hasnt presented one valid argument, ever

      trolls do that, use no logic and think they can litter the blog with their opinions based on nothing.

      Delete
    11. Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to share that with us.

      If I was so ineffective then perhaps you would not have taken the time out of your 'busy schedule' to respond to my posts.

      You would have been better just typing 'MMG is an asshole'. Would have been much less embarrassing.

      MMG

      Delete
    12. A lot of us come here because we got sick and tired of politics after Obummer got re-elected. This site has all of the give and take of a vicious political forum with none of the disastrous consequences for the country.

      MMG is an asshole, but a well meaning asshole, if it helps.

      Delete
    13. I wonder if MMG rages because he defended ketchum for 5 years and ended up getting pwned by the goddess he worshipped?

      Delete
    14. yep, when JREF put the final torpedos in Ketchum's rag he went off the rails.

      Delete
    15. Actually, it's ironic you bring up the political aspect. I too am mainly into politics so when it's not political season, you find something to hold you over till next elections.

      Delete
    16. So the JREF are taking the credit for dismissing Ketchum now?

      Wow. Just wow. As they say.

      Lies. Hate. Distortion.

      MMG

      Delete
    17. Didn't Sharon Hill, or some other Jrefer point out that Ketchum used an April Fool's joke as source material?

      That's when even the diehards at BFF tossed it in the trash.

      Delete
    18. 'Footers' were Ketchum's harshest critics.

      This blog trashed Ketchum long before the paper saw the light of day.

      We knew what was coming and it wasn't going to be pretty.

      Of course Ketchum's failure was the 'death knell' for Bigfoot. Or at least that's what we were told.

      The Bigfoot scene is bigger, stronger than ever. That fact must really stick in the throats of many a Skep.

      MMG

      Delete
    19. It's a scene all right. With more and more people out looking and the incredible advances in technology, still not one piece of organic evidence.

      This would support the theory that the number of squatches is incredibly low. Perhaps a few dozen individuals confined to the PNW.

      Any creature concerned more with evasion than survival is doomed.

      Delete
  8. The creature people call Patty should be renamed Paddy. Because according to Rick Dyer those are testicles hanging from the creatures chest, Not Breasts. Rick Dyer is the Man!!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. They have been denuded of all grey matter. Not deluded.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Every single visitor to this site has an interest in Bigfoot/Sasquatch.
    They either KNOW it exists, or they WANT it to exist.

    Anyone who says otherwise is a LIAR.

    Who visits a site on a subject that they have no interest in?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I want Sykes to come back with all known animals cementing the final death knell in footery.

      Delete
    2. Well, years ago before I developed critical thinking skills I used to believe in bigfoot. Since then, I decided to google search bigfoot evidence to see if anything new was on the brink...but nope. There's nothing and I like it.

      The only reason I keep coming back is the comment section. The comments are way more entertaining than anything in bigfootery. I could care less if it's real or fake, you people are too fun to troll.

      Delete
    3. Don't forget about the entertainment dick ryder provides. How boring would bigfooting have been this summer without that guy!

      Delete
    4. 'I want Sykes to come back with all known animals cementing the final death knell in footery'.

      This would be the end of your world.

      Who would you troll then you sad sack of cat piss?

      MMG

      Delete
    5. ha ha ha MMG are you still upset over the Dick Ryder disappointment?

      Delete
    6. I think MMG is upset because kitekaze is back on the scene

      Delete
    7. The only north wind kitekaze has is the one blowing out of his arse.

      Delete
    8. MMG isn't even worth trolling. He ain't even the jam protruding from PJ's daily repeating and emotionally unstable toes.

      Delete
  11. RD has a live event coming up on Youtube folks! Gotta go.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Look folks, if you want bigfoot to be real and you watch the PGF then you are bound to see a real bigfoot. That of course does not mean bigfoot is real.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I say we all show up at Bob Gimlin's funeral wearimg ape costumes, titties and Got Monkey? signs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^best troll of the day 10/10

      Delete
    2. I wasn't trolling son.

      Look me in the eye:

      Put on them tig ole bitties and slip into your funeral boots. We've got some footin to do.

      Delete
    3. "look me in the eye" is that a parody of bob gimlin at his conference talks where he calls ney sayers up to the stage and says "look me in the eye it were only me and roger up dat there creek dat day" followed by a standing ovation from the footers in the audience?

      Delete
    4. MMG is implying he has access to our IP addys.

      Not the same person, you bipedal fuck.

      Delete
    5. ^^^ MMG had a post deleted in which he implied one person is responding to their own trolling throughout this thread.

      Delete
    6. Well isn't that the truth. Obvious it's the same guy talking to himself.

      Delete
    7. Yeah hes his own best friend

      Delete
  14. Where's Fox been? I hope he didn't get his penis caught in a clamshell or something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd like to know where Kerchak and DWA have been.

      Kerchak's been inactive for a long time.

      Delete
    2. probably woke up one day and realised there is no monkey man

      Delete
    3. SHAWN HEEM BLOX MEE TWO MUUCH SAAZ VAGINA GUD,BUUT MEE CAINT HEELP EET,EET GUD GUD

      Delete
  15. are you considered a newbie if u dont think bigfoot turns invisible ??? if u differ on opinion from Mr Johnson you are forcibly removed from his f/b group.

    Jay Rodriguez

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mmm mmm mmm... doesn't add much to his self-proclaimed credibility, does it?

      Delete
  16. Newbies and Woman who finds possible Sasquatch hair on barbed wire fence in Columbia County are the most credible voices in the Bigfoot community.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Evidence is being withheld until the species is verified which may never happen because logging, mining interests and others for starters are afraid lawsuits will be filed to protect habitat and they will be shut out.
    Look what happened when they established reservations for the native Americans that had valuable natural resources. How would you barter with a bigfoot to get access to anything of value?

    A good day to all.

    ReplyDelete
  18. MATTHEW JOHNSON YOU ARE AN ARROGANT FUCKING ASSHOLE. THE ONLY THING YOU ARE ABLE TO DO IS CONSTANTLY ATTACK THE REST OF THE BIGFOOT COMMUNITY RATHER THAN PRODUCE ANYTHING POSITIVE.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Don't blame the man who camps with a woman he calls his (friend) blame his wife for believing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No worries. I doubt any SHE would be his type.

      Delete
  20. If I came across a bigfoot in the woods, I would not shoot, I would let him or her be.

    If I came across a Rick Dyer in the woods, I'd drop that mother fucker in its mother fucking tracks

    ReplyDelete
  21. Dick Ryder has a TT broadcast coming up on Youtube.
    It is going to be a response to last night's Monster X Steve Kulls show!
    WOW! I am so excited about this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who is the line-up of dorks under him? Which guy is Cathiee?

      Delete
  22. I have never seen someone talk down to everyone else, while climbing up on a pulpit and screaming his own worth. Talk about Arrogance! Matthew Johnson is exactly what he is preaching against. He is building up a cult following with no chance of critical thinkers allowed. Because Matthew is a man who bashed his head so hard a few years ago he quit work and claimed disablility, then asked others for donations to help him out, now he is just learning how he is going to milk people in the bigfoot community, It starts with a couple thousand followers. Then just wait for his money making schemes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^Do you think that ever since this blog (BFE) started praising his research/claims he has become even more high and mighty?

      Delete
    2. What doesn't Shawn promote his old habituator buddy Alex too? Same schtick.

      Delete
    3. Dyer's Youtube hangout is getting more boring and repetitive with each broadcast. The only entertainment is to laugh at that Frank weirdo...

      That Frank guy sits and makes sounds like a parrot whenever Rick speaks. "mmmm-hmmmm" "that's right, Rick" "you said it Rick"

      Has that guy EVER disagreed with Dyer? If Dyer told him the earth was flat, Frank would respond with "mmm-hmmm" "that's right, Rick"

      Delete
    4. Yeah. zzzzzzz...zzzzzzzzzzz...zzzzzzzzzzzzz. Even that old couple cuddled up for the broadcast are nodding off.

      Delete
    5. DYEER EES STOOPID EEGNORINT,HEEM SHUUTS FOX FREEND SOO HEEM WEEL PAAY,LUK HEEM EEN RUUM WEET JOE FOUR WEEK,SMEEL LIKS WHALE

      Delete
  23. Attention all suckers!

    Dyer now has underwear with bigfoot blood on them.
    He said they will go on E-bay.

    ReplyDelete
  24. After reading all this... NOW I know why I LIKE to "look down" on people that have LESS than ME(which is almost everyone). HAW HAW !

    Bob Wire

    ReplyDelete
  25. Money cant buy GENUINE respect,admiration,trust,virtue or UNCONDITIONAL LOVE it has to be EARNED.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Shawn Evidence is the worst thing to happen to this community.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Uhh, right. An alleged psychiatrist telling people about habituated bigfoots and other unsubstantiated claims giving advice to "newbs".


    As far as parental advice with bigfoot goes... tell them the truth:


    People claim to see a lot of things. Ghosts, leprechauns (youtube leprechaun in alabama, all those people can't be mistaken) reptilian aliens.. and ohhhh. Santa Claus! We have pictures of dudes in suits playing those things too. As far as real biological specimens? uhm.... not so much.

    The "pros" are always anti-kill because they know it can be milked this way. Then you have excuses, and outs, and all kinds of awesome "sightings" with no evidence, and no proof.

    The truth is men love a good snipe hunt, and sometimes people are just fucking loony. Others love to lie, and tell a good one.

    Real bigfoots? never, ever.

    Bin Laden was one man in the entire planet found and killed.

    no bigfoot ever, found or killed. Despite claims of them being in almost every state.... habituations... sightings all over the place.

    interesting phenomenon this bigfoot thing is...

    People lying, or being lied to, or just being duped. For funs or money? Usually both ;)


    Bigfoot = human men scammers. Theres your bigfoot. There is the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Yoda. Very profound.

      Wasn't Bin Laden killed after a concerted worldwide hunt by the CIA?

      Are you suggesting that the same efforts are put into finding a bigfoot specimen?

      MMG

      Delete
  28. 10:57. Thank God. Now I have lived long enough to see Bigfoot compared to Bin Laden. Before you demand to see his birth certificate and go on Rush Limbaugh to call him out, citing his association with known radical Muslim clerics, perhaps you might consider what my good friend MMG has said. That the efforts by the US military industrial complex to hunt and kill Bin Laden might be a tiny bit more than those troops and specialists committed to hunting Bigfoot. Strong is the power of the Dark Side of the Force. Fear it.....you will.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RUSH LIMBOOH STOOPID,RUSH BAAND GUD,LIKS VAGINA GUD GUD FOUR EARS,YOO LISSUN GUD YOO LIKS GUD YOO SEEN

      Delete
  29. Joe. You don't know the power of the Dark Side of the Force. Go to Tatooine......meditate you must......until you return...MMG and I will defend Alderraan.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The Millenium Falcon project is the fastest hunk of junk in the Bigfoot Galaxy!

    ReplyDelete
  31. I will sign off today with a plea for help against the evil Dr Johnson and his empire of Bigfootdom "Help me Joe B Wan Kenobi, your my only hope!"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story