A Million Reddit Points To Anyone Who Can Point Out The Bigfoot In This Footage
Here's footage of a ghostly image captured by Mogollon Monster hunter Mitch Waite back in 2011. Though this video is an enhancement, we still can't see the figure that's supposedly moving across the road. This is what Mitch wrote: "In 2011, I made a trip through the Hot Zone while in my truck. Many viewers saw something move across the road. It was very fast and ghost-like. The video was enhanced by Impero Romano, and we got some interesting results."
way late to first!
ReplyDeleteNo way! Fozzie get anthrax?
DeleteNo, just your standard run of the mill diarrhea.
Deleteturd
ReplyDeleteBig hairy balls
ReplyDeleteI win! He is square in the middle of the road at the extreme furthest out point of the headlights. At the 41 second to 42 second time, you can see a light colored figure running left to right.
ReplyDeleteYippee! When do I get my Points? I can hardly wait to spend them.
It's visible when he says "got"!
DeleteGot monkey?
DeleteI see it too!
DeleteSloppy seconds?
No monkeys...
DeletePeace.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteBeen on a real bender Eva... Struggling but alive at least. Love ya sis!
DeletePeace.
According to joes logic this must be real.
ReplyDeleteAccording to your logic, Matilda and Patty are comparable.
DeletePeace.
Both suits so yes
DeleteNo... One is obviously, the other is a nightmare to explain.
DeletePeace.
A nightmare to explain?
DeleteIts a bloke in a suit. There. I said it. Its not hard. Try it.
An expert in costume of 30 years, can't explain the suit... I'll take his word over yours if you don't mind.
DeletePeace.
Ill take all the other ACTUAL costume experts words that its a suit if you don't mind. Oh and also the fact that when I look at it, it looks laughably bad.
DeletePeace.
Bob H said that Patty's head was an old football helmet with some fur stuck on.
DeleteIncredibly Packham and moronic Jref crew think the above statement could actually be true.
MMG
HA HA HA HA HA HA!! I can list those experts that Anon 10:47 is referring to, and not one of them have put ten minutes worth of analysis into the footage and are all close associates who have cast an opinion. D'you know whats's laughably bad? Your poor understanding of human proportions.
DeletePeace.
MMG bob h said it was LIKE an old football helmet. Obviously it wasn't an actual old football helmet.
DeleteAND ANYWAY even if Bob H is lying, that don't mean bigfoot is real. Not even close.
Got delusion?
Joe of course patty doesn't have human proportions, patty is not a human with no clothes on you retard. Patty is a man in a COSTUME that is designed to look like something NON HUMAN, fucking hell you are dumb.
DeleteAnon 11:24...
DeleteYou cannot fit a human's head proportions into Patty's head, so your whole usage of such a claim is ridiculous and proves Bob H even more wrong, so thank you for bringing it up.
Anon 11:25...
See my point to Anon 11:24. The leg length and extended toes can't be explained by you or anyone who claims it's fake... But you'll claim other people are dumb?
Peace.
...Joe, the argument that the slope of the forehead precludes a human wearing a head piece is pretty silly in my opinion..Not as silly as the "one cannot purposely shake the camera in the manner we see in the PGF"...A self-defeating claim if I ever saw one...
DeleteAnyhoo, Meldrum gave Munns some of his grant money so we can expect to see an article by Munns in the RHI. Maybe he will talk about this forehead thing and explain why it is not silly....
We got some sore butt-hurt minions here huh?
DeleteRepeating over and over that Patty is a man in a suit does not make it so.
The more 'science' and technology we throw at the footage the more it purports to show a as yet unidentified by science, flesh and blood creature.
I'm sure you'll tell me not to be so f*cking stupid 'It's a guy in suit'.
Lame, Lamer, Lamest.
MMG
Lol mmg are you trolling?
DeleteThe more science and technology you throw at finding the creature still results in absolutely nothing.
Of course it does if you casually dismiss the Footprint evidence and literally thousands of eyewitness accounts.
DeleteMMG
Ah, footprints...the easiest thing to fake outside of blobsquatches. Yes, even with your precious dermal ridges as Dr. Sarmiento proved on monsterquest.
DeleteAh, yes, the various 3, 4, 5 toed casts, cripplefoot, trackways, divergent toes in asia....so reliable, so trustworthy...not
Oh yeah, those thousands of credible eyewitnesses complete with their own character witnesses....those are sooo trustworthy and admissible to science...oh wait.
Any one who has spent ten minutes looking at numerous casts can see that there are many, many first time prints that have a similarity in style of dermal ridging in the same way that two sets of finger prints from opposite sides of the country would look similar in style at first, regardless of apparent uniqueness under analysis. These casts cannot be explained away with desiccation because they have scar tissue and toe bending that many people who have done proper analysis have sited as the creature gripping into earth. There is a clear difference between desiccation marks and complex dermal markings. You can look for yourself on any image search engine and the fact that some have sited some casts that have been made poorly by amateur casters (these are mostly untrained civilian researchers, not perfectionists), as the main source to disprove such is at best desperate and ignorant of the wider picture of the sometimes difficult process it is to extract such prints. What a one in a billion lottery win chance that would be to somehow get the same pattern decades apart from opposite sides of the country?! The pouring of liquid into a cast can make desiccation wrinkles yes, but when done by amateur casters and there is so, so much more casts to counter that argument. Explain casts that are attained 40 miles into the interior of wilderness areas? The hoaxers would have to be either psychic or mind controllers to predict to the exact yard where the researchers are going to be to the exact moment eh?
DeleteTo go with the ten's of thousands of eye witness testimony (a lot of which multiple person), we have thousands of years of Native American culture. Thousands... wall paintings some 8 feet tall true to size and if you know anything about indigenous culture, you would know that ceremonies, dances, utensil designs like baskets, all these things indigenous people do to pass down historical events, identity and culture because, as some may claim; written texts can be manipulated and missinterpreted. There is an easily attainable timeline of Native American culture by the determining the age of settlement sites. Burnt wood and other means have been used to carbon date areas where indigenous peoples who maintain the Bigfoot culture have resided.
Peace.
Anon 11:59...
DeleteRight... what is exactly 'silly' about not being able to fit a human's head proportions in Patty's?
Peace.
trolls are just REACHING for something anything.
DeleteIts fun watching them drown. Keep it up MMG and Joe haha
..The claim itself is silly in my opinion.."It is not possible to put a human head inside a mask with those proportions"..
DeleteWell it's not... I have based that claim on a presentation by Munns, which under thorough analysis determined that it can't.
DeletePeace.
isnt it great when trolls call people delusional.
Deletedo you not realize that to be a troll you have to be so disconnected from reality that you get off by online bullying like a child? Your not hurting anyone, just your own mind.
Sad sad trolls.
keep cleaning them up joe, we love reading it.
"..The claim itself is silly in my opinion.."It is not possible to put a human head inside a mask with those proportions".."
Deleteand thats all it is, your opinion. You are no expert and that opinion you care so much about, its worthless. troll
?! But I draw that opinion based on expert analysis?? So it's not just an opinion, but backed by expert analysis???
DeletePeace.
...Really, how can anyone prove something like that? They can't, they can merely have that opinion-one that Munns agrees with but Meldrum probably does not...
DeleteWhat we can do, or more specifically what Munns has done... I try ad replicate the 'suit mask', to which i couldn't fit a human head.
DeletePeace.
Why so angry 2:11?.. If its impossible for it to be a mask then the PGF has to show an actual bigfoot(like Joe says, if its not a suit what else can it be)...
DeleteYou should be happy...lol...
My bad, I didnt mean to say that TO joe, I was talking to the troll and fugged it up in quotes my bad joe!
DeleteIt seems critical thinking skills have been lost with you footers.
ReplyDeletehahahahaa says the troll with zero argument other an an opinion and skeptic attitude.
DeleteIn the future, will hoaxed Bigfoot costumes require both male and female genitalia in order for them to fool analysis by the experts?
ReplyDeleteRemember the photo at a campground that some guy claimed was a bigfoot with an erection standing near him? Blurry, probably a branch, then some guy claimed that he debunked it because the photo according to him looked like it had been circumcised.J.D.
DeleteHA HA HA HA HA HA!!
DeletePeace.
That is strange indeed.
DeleteThis bigfoot stuff is always full of surprises. Usually on a daily basis!
Hi Joe!
DeletePeace.
Hello Ed! Peace bro!
DeleteYet another statistical malady from the footer crowd, gorillas have tiny wangs relative to body size and other primates such as chimps has larger wangs.
DeleteWhere does that leave bigfoot?
Some witnesses claim they have ginormous wangs, while others claim they have tiny little peckers (like ostman says).
I mean every animal has a relative penis length to body ratio, gorillas is about 2", Chimps about 4", humans about 6"....but bigfoot seems to have a ratio of anywhere from tiny to huge relative to body size.
Just yet another super inconsistency from bigfoot reports.
None of this really matters though when you consider taterhole depth.
..Ed, you never paid me for my brilliant performance in "Night of The Ghouls"....
DeleteI realize, my dear friend, it was never distributed in theaters. In the future, which we are all interested in because all our lives will be lived in the future, it will be released on DVD....
So you are saying humans have consistent size penis'? Seriously?? Everyone is different and not everyone is an expert on anatomy especially not some troll spouting ignorance on a blog. haha
DeleteHigh Ed,and joe. Ed, you doing any movies in the future? I gots some old props I can give ya. Some old hub caps and a used shower curtain. thanx
DeleteHey Skunkey bro! How are you buddy?!
DeletePeace.
Hey Joe, I gotta recipe on the what ails ya. I hear you had the sickness of the hair sample that bit ya..Anyway. it's a Bloody Mary with extra Mary...keep em thinking.buddy!
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!!
DeletePeace.
I'm saying the studied average of gorilla dong is 2", Chimp 4", Human was somewhere like 5.6" range. Here's a quick animal kingdom one from google
Deletehttp://voices.yahoo.com/penis-size-animal-kingdom-272333.html?cat=46
You can go look up human dong ratio on your own.
I'm saying species have average size of everything, yes some are hung and some have tiny peckers, but for the most part there is a consistent average.
Every animal in the animal kingdom has been studied this way. Did you not take bio or organ chem in college?
So, there may be a few long dick straggling bigfoot out there but that does explain for the complete discrepancy in reporting.
bbbbbiiittcchh
Please show us all the penis reports your referring to. I have only heard like 2 people talk about their dicks. You seem to know a lot about BF dicks. Where are all these BF dick reports ?!
DeleteI have seen your crazed ramblings on here over the last few things Joe, so lets get one thing straight.
ReplyDeleteThe PGF is worthless and there is no Bigfoot.
There is ZERO, yes ZERO evidence that a bipedal creature lives hidden in North America. If there was such a species we WOULD have evidence for it. Real evidence. Its not like we are looking for a new species of insect here, this is an 8 foot primate. It is insane to think it could evade us and our technology without fault all these years.
To think the PGF is anything but a man in a suit is completely irrational and it is clear your rational thinking skills are little to non existent. No doubt you were late to the party to find out Santa Clause wasn't real.
Most 10 year olds would see the PGF and think man in a suit. Deluded footers like Joe not so much. It truly is a fascinating psychological phenomenon that draws these Joe types to want to believe in a magical ape.
Try looking at some real science about real creatures, its a truly fascinating and beautiful world out there. If you struggle to find amazement and wonder in the world without needing to include a magic monkey then I really feel sorry for you.
Peace.
You know. I think this genius has debunked the PGF and Bigfoot right there.
DeleteThe post above has really made me evaluate my thoughts on this subject.
I especially like the comparison of Sasquatch to Santa Claus. Why didn't I consider all of this before.
Thanks Anon 10:44. You saved my life.
MMG
Hello Anon 10:44.
DeleteRight... Let's ignore Patty for a minute. Let's focus on what we have as opposed to that.
We have our evidence in the form of footprints & dermals that are found sometimes 50 miles into the interior of wilderness areas, DNA, a transcribed complex language, at least one other un-debunk-able video, 100 years of printed media in libraries up and down the States, thousands of years of native American culture, thousands of eye witness testimony many multiple person, a recognition by science in Dr Sykes and Oxford University... And like in any scientific debate, it is down to you to bring the experts to counter ours... Oh I forgot, you can't. Instead you would rather deny we have any evidence at all. Well let me explain something to you... Our evidence does not diminish because you claim it is not there... That is child-like, cynical and denial based behavior. And you want to talk about 'real science'?
We have not stumbled across remains of this creature because more often than not, you will not come across any remains of apex predators in the wild. I know hunters of 30 years who have not come across bear remains; does that mean bears are not real? Now; in comparing a dumb animal to Bigfoot; we are talking about a highly intelligent creature that in Native American legends (Cherokee especially) buries it's dead. To build from those cultures' we have a transition from legend to white settler's accounts that are printed in news media around the mid 1800's and the turn of the century.
Now, let's get back to Patty shall we? If the creature isn't real, what is it? A man in a suit? Ok... You now have a burden to explain how that suit was achieved. This is how 'real scientific' debate works; not casting your cynical unqualified opinion and expect it to wash. In any level of debate, you need to back up your claims. I can comfortable claim that the creature you see in that footage is real because I have a costume expert of 30 years back me up that it is not a human in a suit. I also have people like you avoiding explaning your claim that in every attempt makes my claim more realistic.
You see, the PGF isn't 'useless', it's a very significant obstacle that stands up as something for you to explain and as 46 years roll by and time goes on, and popular culture embraces the idea of this species, and people start putting one and one and one together, and we have recognition of science... and you and your 'real science' are no closer to debunking the idea, it leaves you with a question...
'Am I scared of the idea?'
Peace.
Exactly my point Joe, there is no evidence. If there was evidence, we would erm, well, actually see the evidence. Thanks for the clarification.
DeleteYou're welcome MMG.
DeleteThe truth is more beautiful than any mystery monkey man could ever be.
Anon 11:27... Did you read my comment properly? Ha! Typical. Anything to avoid coming to terms with trying to explain what we have eh?
DeleteAnon 11:28...
The truth is what scares you I'm afraid.
Peace.
Hey joe.
DeleteWhy you let this kid jack you up ?
These trolls are just kids on summer brake having a great time on your dime
MMC
All I keep reading from you, Joe, is hundreds of years of this and thousands of years of that.
DeleteYou'd think in allllll that time there would be a shred of conclusive, legitimate, scientific evidence...but sadly for the footing world there isn't.
Just more he said, she said, he saw, she saw bullcrap that has nothing to show skeptics.
Tracks are hoaxed, even dermal ridges. Which of these tracks were found with the same dermal ridges, soooo far away, soooo deep in the woodland interior?
I said that crap over a month ago when arguing with a jref anon, did you seriously start spewing that out as fact too?
I've told you how Patty was made, just how "you" told me Matilda was made. You have yet to acknowledge that you are attempting to recreate "such an obvious hoax," so why in the blue hell should we start working to recreate an "obvious hoax".
Oh, right "BUUUUTT IT'S NOOOT A HOAAX, RABBLE RABBLE TOES RABBLE HELMET RABBLE DIAPER"
It's a stupid and meaningless task to recreate patty suit, because even if it were done perfectly, you'd still call out the "sun isn't shining directly onto her bossoms," and thus the circle repeats.
The truth is what scares you, Joe. Sykes has nothing just like the rest of the footing world has nothing.
Like I said before, IF, and that's one hell of an IF, bigfoot IS proven to be real...good, great, GRAND! Epic! Now you won't be the complete laughing stock of mainstream media and science. Maybe you can actually bring them REAL evidence...you know, like a facking body?
Apparently, I never graduated high school.
DeleteMMG
Anon 12:03... You posted something very similar on the other blog page to me... Here, this is what I responded to you with...
Delete"IF bigfoot is found to exist, great, GRAND, epic...now you won't be the complete laughing stock of mainstream media and science. I will GLADLY serve up some crow and eat it."
Hmmmmmm, now... If I'm, not mistaken, to put something like that half way through your comment that tries to denounce Bigfoot, is a little bit of an acknowledgment that the creature could exist which would suggest a contradiction of your claim not seconds before? If you have come to conclusion after all these years that the creature is not real, it is because the research field has been looking for a gorilla that isn't there. Listen, I really, really don't want to sound like an ignorant bastard, especially to someone who has obviously been into this subject longer than me, but why in all this time has science not debunked this subject? True... we have yet to prove it, but science is asking the questions. You cannot deny that.
"Even IF PGF is an organic creature, it's doesn't prove jack squat other than Patterson and Gimlin are the two luckiest men in 50+ years of modern footing."
Well, forgive me if I'm not correct... But if the PGF was proven to be real, then that would mean Bigfoot are real... would it not?
Look, I don't want to come across condescending or rude to you... But your comment comes across like you have are still not sure what to think to be honest...
"If bigfoot does exist, it's an extra terrestrial form that will never be found, trapped, killed, or otherwise documented."
What a statement that was! Listen, if I had said something like that, I would have been shot to pieces, but d'you know what? I agree with you. There is that possibility and for all you condemning the way I think, it turns out we are not that much different at all.
Now the... Back to Patty and Matilda and the truth... You have never provided me or anyone with an explanation for Patty and to suggest that Matilda is anything but a wookie mask is embarrassing, childish and over-cynical to the point it is almost not worth responding to... ALMOST; it is just way too fun schooling people like you, I have the time of my life...
Peace.
MMC... If I can just explain something to you...
DeleteThere ARE times when I get worked up, yes and that's because I am passionate about the subject... But I can assure you that 98% of the time, I am really enjoying myself and would not be able to cope if people like these trolls didn't egg me on or went away. I enjoy it, otherwise I wouldn't participate... I hope you can appreciate that?
Furthermore, I see there repetitive haggling very conducive. If I can get what I preach out as often as possible to all the different people who visit this blog around the world daily, some of who may just come here once and never come back, then I am doing something right in my eyes, and I have no problem with repeating myself and coming across preachy because if I don't; those fleeting visitors will see the troll's point of view as opposed to mine and considering it's a Bigfoot blog; I find that just a little important, yeah?
Peace MMC.
Joe, of course the Native American legends and pictographs raise legitimate questions, but this 100 years of printed media jazz is weak sauce...
DeleteA group called the "Bigfoot Chicks" took an researched these old newspaper stories and shared their results on the web. There was no consistency in these obviously exaggerated tabloid accounts of "wildmen"...The only unifying thread was that they all just nutty guys terrorizing rural folks...
The New York Times said Ray Wallace was, for all intents and purposes, Bigfoot. Do stories like that count? You can't point to the media when it suits and cry "conspiracy" when it doesn't...
Anyway, in your opinion, what are the 3 best pre-1958 stories? I think the Ruby Creek story is compelling...
A lot of the news media stories were taken from the early settlers diaries of the time. These were eerily consistent and had no chance of seeing each others' accounts.
DeleteI'll check out that Ruby Creek story now.
Peace.
seriously he isnt saying that those old stories prove bigfoot, it is just very odd that those people all have super similar stories from before people communicated about the subject, especially over long distances like say: ACROSS THE WORLD
DeleteExactly, and the fact that those accounts were in transition with ten thousand years worth of native culture regarding the creature; it lends more credibility.
DeletePeace.
NO JOE IT DOESNT
DeleteFACEPALM.
No Facepalm person... it means that it's even harder to claim native legends are wrong or 'mushroom trips', because you have white settlers claiming the same, prior to them having an understanding of such culture. I truly feel so sorry for any Native American people who visit this blog, I am shocked at the level of which your long culture is treated.
DeletePeace.
Well said sir joe! I had a chance to see my Lakota Brothers a couple years back near the "Wounded Knee Accounts" at the Pine Ridge Resevation. This was before "Finding Bigfoot" did an episode there. I like the stories they tell of the Wildman who wants nothing more than not be proven. On this I feel both sides should feel good! And how the hell are you joe my bro acoss the pond?..Bad Brain(DC) for sure!!
DeleteHEEEYYYYY STEVE!!
DeleteMan, that's incredible, so according the Lokota; they would like to be recognized???
PS. Got your email bro, will respond to you later!!
Love ya Steve.
Would not..Just passing thru so they say..love to all*
DeleteSorry buddy! I should have read your comment properly!
DeleteI'll drop you an email later pal!
Peace bro.
That's alright bud. I guess I see the irony of something that demands proof and the subject at hand not wanting what we have to offer...
Deletelove back@ya joe...do you like SKA?
Steve, for all our talk of hardcore and punk, we've never got around to discussing other genres; I love reggae and ska and have a collection of it I should probable ensure. What do you like specifically my man?
DeletePeace bro.
I am going to see the Voodoo Glow Skulls/the Toasters!! But Iam watching a MM Bosstones documentary right now.
DeleteWow man, The Glowskulls are slamming! I've seen the Bosstones and they were amazing; saw them supporting NOFX in London in 2001 I think, or around then.
DeletePeace bro.
NOFX,Melvins!! they get top priority on my player....you have great taste..till next time.. mail me friend..peace for sure.
DeleteMelvins live in Norway on YouTube with two drummers; amazing!
DeleteSpeak soon my friend!
Peace bro.
AZ may be the place. Spooky valley to be exact. In the spring and summer. Very Squatchey.
ReplyDeleteMMC
You can post anything from a blank piece of paper to Mars and the bigfooters will see their wee bigfoot. It's an exercise in stupid, in which they excel.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of an "exercise in stupid" ^^^ and "wee".
DeleteI guess you weren't even able to demonstrate an exercise in stupidity.
For your failure in that endeavor, our jury has concluded that you be advanced from the run of the mill rank of skeptard to supertard, due to the depth of your level of stupidity.
We congratulate you.
Congratulations.
MMG ^
Deleteno dick ^
DeleteJoe and MMG have taken another beating.
ReplyDeleteWhen will they realise that no matter how many words they type it wont magic up a bigfoot into existence.
I don't think so. Show me the evidence.
DeleteI watched this video and immediately called WTF. With that said if you pay attention to the beginning there is something crossing the road. all the rest is BS and someone with a vivid imagination.
ReplyDeleteThat's alright bud. I guess I see the irony of something that demands proof and the subject at hand not wanting what we have to offer...
ReplyDeletelove back@ya joe...do you like SKA?
Steve, for all our talk of hardcore and punk, we've never got around to discussing other genres; I love reggae and ska and have a collection of it I should probable ensure. What do you like specifically my man?
DeletePeace bro.
I saw what they were talking about on 0:33 of the normal speed. the problem is they're calling it bigfoot and the enhancement is not that. it's digital artifacts that you can make any shape out of. I think they caught the back end of an animal walking off the road. No eye shine is kind of strange but not if the head was turned away. This is not Bigfoot. Mitch and Susan have a tendency to go back over things at the request of their viewers who often see things.
ReplyDeleteFrom the quality of this video I could also say the headlights moving could create the illusion of an animal running off the road. Call that Shadow play if you will.
Would the PG guys find somewhere else to argue over Crap instead of on this Fine Blog that shows Crap ! Susanfarns or Mogolon Bigfoot is the Real Deal and should restrict blogs like this on showing their Crap ! Swatting Flies
ReplyDeletethey have nothing they are just drowning in their ignorance
Deleteand you are going to like it!
Deletehis cheap ass equipment cant keep up with his complicated fantasy.
ReplyDelete