You Can't Really Call This "Bigfoot Attacks Child as People Watch" Video A Hoax, Because It Isn't
Look, people. This video doesn't qualify as a hoax as some of you are suggesting. Listen to the people laughing in the background. If this was real, you'd be hearing screams. Though this is obviously a prank, we're going to wait for Phil to break this one down to be sure.
first!
ReplyDeleteBow down eunuchs!
DeleteYes we were all gelded by Cyndi. Her and her coven sauteed them with wild mushrooms and fava beans. Bobo showed up and ate half the cauldren. His epic farting led to his banishment from the gathering. He wandered off and took a big knarly one. Later terrifing noises came from the forest. It was later found the forest people were penis joisting each other over the rights to roll in Bobos dump. While the dominate males were going at it, best out of three tilts, the young squatch that escaped Justin Smega ran in stole the loaf.He is going to smear it all over himself as a camo against preditory humans.........
Deletesurely you joust
DeleteAHHHHHH! Pedosquatch!
ReplyDelete3 =Funny video!
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile Smeja is eating a donut somewhere. That guy is worthless.
ReplyDeleteSmeja is an American zero!
DeleteWhy? Because he shot an imaginary creature??
DeleteSmeja gave Sykes the boot. Ha ha urf urf.
Delete^^I really don't have anything against Smeja...I just wanted to add some variety to the "American Hero" motif that so commonly appears
DeleteTheir elusiveness lets the sasquatch command exorbitant fees in the drug and human trafficking markets.
ReplyDeleteThis site is like the Sasquatch Evidence site we'll never have.
ReplyDeleteThis site has turned into a farce. I think that everyone here has come to the conclusion that bigfoot is nothing but folklore.
ReplyDeleteOr Shawn is nothing but a mediawhore
Delete^^don't let Joe hear you say that...we'll all be in for another stern lecturing
DeleteThe only farce is clowns who prioritise their time to come on a blog they don't believe in. Just cause of different time zones and you are jobless and can stay up all night, doesn't mean the comment section is lacking sonny... Get a social life and stop looking for reassurance where you can't get it.
DeletePeace.
Hey Joe,
DeleteIt's pure entertainment. The comments are the best.
I watch Finding Bigfoot sometimes as well for entertainment only. I don't sit there and think this is the episode they will finally find bigfoot. Do you?
Peace.
Hey Anon...
DeleteIf you think anyone that takes this subject with the slightest piece of seriousnous thinks Finding Bigfoot is remotely entertaining; then yet again, you are grossly missunderstood.
Though I'm not stating I'd like skeptics to not voice their important side of the debate; I react negatively to posts such as the one above because the guy is obviously someone who visits this blog sporadically and doesn't see enthusiasts like me school people like you to often.
In response to a post you gave me on another page, you need to offer me at least an expert's opinion to counter the evidence I presented you, or your opinion is nothing more than igorant and based on what you would rather of this subject; nothing more. Also in your ignorance, you forget that I have won half 'the bet' already... Science has recognised the species in Sykes which means the questions are starting to be answered and THAT is something I'm going to enjoy people like you having to swallow. I'd get your excuses ready if I were you... Lucky you'll still be anonymous and won't lose face eh?
The clock is ticking sir...
Peace.
Hey Joe,
DeleteI live in the PNW the best place to have an bigfoot sighting. I've been hunting, fishing, camping, and hiking along time here. I have never seen or heard anything that could not be explained.
You would be very welcome to come over here and try to school me. But I guarantee you will be the one being schooled.
Peace.
I very much respect a man of the outdoors and furthermore, respect even greater someone that is quite clearly a gentleman, but just because you have not come across an experience that would indicate you being in the presence of such a creature, does not mean the people who have, haven't.
DeleteI do not ignore the inumerable eye witnesses, some of which are multiple person to this creature; some of which are not mistaken due to there level of trauma they have endured and I can refer you to many of my friends in the States who have just the same level of experience as you, if not more, and would disagree with you profoundly. I am willing to accept your point of view as it's very important, but it frustrates me when people, especially quite clever people such as yourself ignore the sources of evidence that in your eyes don't even require asking questions about, let alone considering.
I mean everything I put to you in the most respectful way as is possible, but you need to listen to the people who have had these experiences as you may yet draw from your own one day as an outdoorsman.
Sincere respect, your friendly advocacy;
Joe.
I meant; 'friendly adversary' of course... Bloody iPhones!
DeletePeace.
Hey Joe,
DeleteI have been out in the field with different footers over the years and listened to their stories with an open mind. Some of the footers thought an coyote, fox, elk, barred owl, nighthawk saw whet owl vocalizations were from bigfoots. They even tried to tell me a bigfoot snapped this tree even after I showed them the pellets still in the tree and the shotgun shells lying off the trail. I even had an argument with a very well known footer about an deer that he said was an elk.
And if you are not right there with them they will tell you that some bigfoots just messed with them or something and you should have been there.
I've even went to the 2003 Bigfoot Symposium in Willow Creek and met most of the big names of the bigfoot world. I even met an guy from England at the film site. His name was Paul I believe. Was that you?
So I do try to keep an open mind and would love for the bigfoots to be real. But I don't think that it is going to happen. I admit there is a slight chance I could be wrong. And if I am I would gladly eat crow.
Peace.
No, my name is Joe Fitzgerald and I am in my early 30'a and am from Wales. I genuinely understand that there are Footers out there that make every bump in the night a Sasquatch experience; however most good Footers will highlight this as the reason as to why the subject is not as credible. There is too much nonsense like Finding Bigfoot and too much new age crap filtering through for many to take it seriously and it's damaging things for the people who are trying to get answers. The subject has been tuned too long to finding a gorilla that isn't there and this is why many people who have been into the subject way longer than me have lost interest in being enthusiastic and turned to being pessimistic; the research has not bared any fruit. The game is changing and with different means of attaining research; the balls is rolling better and we now have someone as credible as Sykes at least asking the questions; the start of any scientific breakthrough. Even if Sykes get's ridiculed for his findings (which I think are in favour of our scenario because he has become a member of Bigfootology and has had an 'experience' that he will not comment on just yet), it will encourage other independent groups to replicate the study because of who he is and then; you have your repeatable evidence science demands.
DeletePeace.
Hey Joe,
DeleteWhere do you draw the line? If multiple people have seen aliens, Santa, mothman, chupacabras, etc. Does that mean you don't ignore them? What about multiple people seeing bigfoot with aliens/ufos, or paranormal abilities? Do you ignore them?
Just because multiple people have claimed to have seen something all around the world doesn't mean it's real.
I was with a group of footers that said a barred owl was a bigfoot. Lucky for me I brought some barred owl recordings and played it to them. Some still didn't believe it was just an barred owl.
That's where hoaxes, lies, misidentification, gradious delusions, alcohol/drug use, and so on come into play. Because no one can rule out any of these.
In the bigfoot sighting reports do the investigators ask any of the people if they have a family history of mental disease, lying, hoaxing, alcohol/drug use, etc. And you know the person if asked would say no.
Peace.
You are excluding the inumerable experiences of very credible experienced people. Even if just ten percent of all the accounts were detracted as credible in comparison to all those possible scenarios you listed; there would still be that ten percent that is credible and out of the entire number, we have significant scientific sources of evidence and history to back up those claims.
DeleteBigfoot are widely reported as mimicking wilderness creatures and there are sound recordings of creatures quite clearly doing so, but this is what some researchers are taking to the next level to which makes it not credible anymore; by stating that every bloody wilderness creature is a Bigfoot. You are forgetting that enthusiasts have the much harder task in finding evidence, usually under circumstances that defy their credibility; so they unfortunately occasionally leap all over things that after a second look; are not what they seem to be and most good Footers will tell you that.
Now I understand that I may be outspoken in the wider Bigfoot community when i state this; but I genuinely feel that these creatures have preternatural abilities that maybe nowhere near understood with our current level of sensory perception and 3rd dimensional space & time. Quantum physics is just beginning to understand sub-atomic particles and if you use your imagination to apply this theory to this subject, you can almost imagine it being the case as would describe how eye witnesses see silhouettes and dark masses 'gliding' through the trees;
"Nature defies common sense, and this really happens: an electron or other particle can disappear in one location and simultaneously reappear at another location if the wave associated with the particle extends to the other location. After you buy that, we can make sense out of the rest of it..."
I also feel that we cannot rule out the possibility of these creatures maybe using a highly evolved ability of infra-sound, to which may be used in some way to distract people to their presence or even unconsciously channel oblivious people into various avenues of the wilderness, either to encourage them away from their family & social groups, or even in extreme cases, to use them as more easily attainable prey... which would concur with many an eye witnesses feelings that the creature stalking them were giving off the impression of an apex predator in practice.
If you have a creature that hunts and eats meat at night, evades people for it's safety in social groups and buries it's dead, then you will only see such a creature at the frequency it is reportedly seen and we have thousands of years of Native American culture; some of these people being the best trackers and hunters in the world, to back up that theory.
Peace.
Furthermore; you have compared this creatures to Santa (I don't know anyone who has reported a sighting of Santa?), which is a little over cynicle, aliens are no doubt real, we now know what Chupacrabras are.
DeletePeace.
I also meant to spell 'cynical'... bloody iPhones!!
DeletePeace.
Hey Joe,
Delete(I don't know anyone who has reported a sighting of Santa?)
Are you telling me that children are not credible?
Peace.
Ha ha ha ha ha!!
DeletePeace.
See people why Tiny Rick Dyer wants to eradicate these evil malicious creatures!! They are a menace to human kind!
ReplyDeleteThis is no prank people. I am the kid and I escaped with one arm only. It ripped by dog apart in front of me. I am currently leading a society for hunting bigfeet with plasma shotgun
ReplyDelete