BigfootWeekend September Expedition

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

The Ohio Grassman Is Terrifying


Cryptomundo.com just posted these images from the popular TV show Destination America’s Mountain Monsters: Grassman of Perry County episode that aired last month. The close up image is below:

Captured on Game Camera: Dogman or Grassman? You decide!
Click to enlarge

133 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. ...no first... the correct way sucks!!!!!!

      Delete
    2. whatever happened to correct way? still hospitalized from that horrific pwning? parents take away his internet access?

      Delete
    3. Sad.You guys wait for a new story to post first...

      Delete
    4. Why can't they leave the Grassman alone?All he was trying to do was take a dump.And then they go and take pics of him.What a bunch of perves!!!

      Delete
    5. Ways to identify a footer:
      1. Fat
      2. Lives with parents
      3. Uses the word "skeptard"
      4. Cuts down people with mom references. (obviously the cut downs are as old as the PGF man in a suit film)
      5. Doesn't realize there is no such thing as a magic monkey running around in the woods of North America
      6. Can barely hold a job
      7. Secretly reads Rick Dyer's site
      8. Masturbates to Melba's Possum DNA paper
      9. Tries to first on blog, like a retarded five year old
      10. Is just a plain moron for still trying to find something as relevant to existence as the tooth fairy
      11. Doesn't realize that there are HD cameras today and the pictures they analyze are intentionally blurry because they are fake.
      12. Dumb as a box of rocks
      13. Might say this is too much reading

      Delete
    6. Ha,ha...never had first

      Delete
    7. +100000000 rick dyer

      MMG is one of these people

      Delete
    8. The grassmen only live in two states, Washington and Colorado.

      Delete
    9. Your Work Has Been Corrected See Me After ClassWednesday, July 3, 2013 at 6:23:00 PM PDT

      Ways to identify a skeptard:
      1. Obese/out of shape
      2. Lives with parents
      3. Uses the word "footard"
      4. Cuts down people with mom references (obviously the cut downs are as old as the HOAX that the PGF is a man in a suit)
      5. Doesn't realize that Bob Hilarious is a hoaxer and that there are no panda bears swinging free and easy throughout N America
      6. Can not hold a job
      7. Secretly reads Sharon Shill's site and blog
      8. Masturbates to Sharon Shill's There Is No Such Thing Manifesto
      9. Tries to first on blog, like a retarded five year old
      10. Is just a plain moron for still trying to claim that Bob Hilarious was Patty
      11. Doesn't realize that people don't have HD cameras handy and at the ready for every form of wildlife about to unexpectedly race by at high speed
      12. Dumb as a box of rocks
      13. Will whine that this is too much reading

      Delete
    10. What is going on??? I miss the old days. H

      Delete
    11. HA HA HA HA HA!! I think it rather funny!!
      Peace.
      Joe.

      Delete
    12. YOO RITE JOE EET AAM FUUNY,AAL CAAPES LAFF MAKS EET MOORE FUUNY,YOO SMAART JOE

      Delete
    13. Hey Joe, just FYI. I was on an overnight trip last Thursday/Friday with the law and public safety class students I teach. We were in the field as I was teaching night surveillance, etc. I showed the students the difference between Generation 1 plus night vision and Gen 3. We used both to observe/collect data in total darkness. Gen 1 night vision uses the same technology that Infra-red trail cameras use at night to take photos without utilizing the "flash" that the trail camera uses during the day to take pics. (According to the trail cam manufacturers, the game will not spook because of the lack of flash). When using the Gen 3 technology at night it does not omit an infrared beam. The Gen 1 plus uses infrared to enhance its night vision. Although IR is invisible to humans, it is clearly visible to any animal that has nocturnal vision. I proved this to the students by allowing them to observe me using the Gen 1 plus while they viewed me using the Gen 3. The Gen 1 plus omits what looks like a huge flashlight beam when observed through the Gen 3. Although the Gen 1 plus cannot be seen with our naked eye, it is glaringly obvious with the Gen 3. Although I used this training to drive home a point about never using Gen 1 for surveillance (the bad guys may have Gen 3 or better night vision and they will know you are there, etc.) some of the students who are hunters immediately said, "any animal who sees in the dark could see the gen 1 plus."

      For those who are speptical of this info. test it for yourself.

      Archer1

      Delete
    14. Archer1!

      I am noticing your post quite late but I am still responding in the hope that you will still see this!

      Amazing post my friend and educating to all concerned!! I keep maintaining it but you have a wealth of knowledge of the outdoors and clearly know what you're doing my friend so please, please, please keep posting because you are coming up with profoundly relevant research and information for people like me who know this species is real but can't access the vast wildernesses you are so lucky to have on your doorstep.

      I very sincerely mean this buddy; post more often, it's always good to hear of your findings and very important to the cause!!

      Much respect!
      Joe.

      Delete
  2. That is The Incredible Melting Man...a cool sci-fi\horror flick from '78 featuring the work of Rick Baker....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed..A 50's type creature feature plus 70's gore= a lotta fun...

      Delete
    2. Lawn mower man with a retarded Jeff Farley and amazingly dated cgi ?

      Delete
  3. Looks like some sort of unidentified blob, so looks like a sizable population of 8 foot/1,000 lb. grasspeople live in Ohio.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who would win a fight between Grassman and Bigfoot? A cryptozoologist should publish a paper answering that open question on Melba's website\journal....

      Delete
    2. Who would win in a a fight between the Grassman and his mortal enemy Lawnmowerman

      Delete
    3. De Novo Scientific Journal Issue 2 to be released soon!!!

      Delete
    4. Issue 2 really? That would be nice.

      Delete
  4. Not good enough to show or prove anything.

    But we know these creatures exist through the many many reports over time

    I'm a bleever I gonna see her if I try

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WAZZZ UP MICKY DOLENZ!!!!

      Delete
    2. Oh ya know. Just grooving man. Feelin cool watching live Cairo Egypt on the tube. That is what freedom is all about and it's beautiful man. Far out !!!

      Happy Independance Day everybody !

      MMC

      Delete
    3. Same to you Bigdad.

      MMC

      Delete
  5. If it was an actual animal, I would assume it would have a face. Mountain Monsters? Why are we looking at stuff from a stupid TV show? More like Mountain Oysters.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow, it appears to be actually made of grass. Must be why they picked the name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, that's how they make them there G suits...to look like grass.

      Delete
  7. This GrassSquatch would kick Peace Joe's Leaping Lemur's Ass in a game of Charades.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HEEM HOORT JOE THAANS MEE NOO LIKS,SMAAHS WEET ROOCK

      Delete
  8. This one's the real deal folks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I give up. You people are just STUPID! Get off your butt for once and get out there yourself. So quick to judge. There will never be any evidence as long as you sit there crying....Oh, here's you towel..
    Here's mister airplane....open the little hanger...yummmm....yummm...can I have some more pudding??....You can't have more pudding until you finish your meat...Pink Floyd anyone??...Look at that pretty little airplane up in the sky...Mother did they drop the bomb??..Mother will they try and brake my ba...
    Squatch is in Ohio...get over it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Floyd references are good stuff. I can't get up to Ohio anytime soon, so if you don't mind, could you please get a clear pic and/or some video to share with us from this Squatch ridden state? This Blobsquatch photo just doesn't cut if for me. Also, if you could have those TPS Reports to me by Saturday, that would be Super...mmmkay?

      Delete
    2. I'm in Ohio right now! Uhm...not so squatchy.

      Delete
    3. please don't use my lyrics to expound on your asinine belief in a magic monkey man...Thank You






      Delete
    4. Please join Floyd on their next tour and we'll think about it.

      Delete
    5. PLEEZ DOO THAAT ROOGER,FLOOYD GUD LIKS VAGINA GUD,MEE LIKS FLOOYD VAGINA GUD,EET GUD,MAKS JOE HAAPY NUT LISSUN HOOSKER DOO DOO NOO MOOR

      Delete
    6. Anon 2:10, Sharon Shill is sounding a bit Sharon Shrill today, isn't she now?

      Delete
  10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB9Z21Yo7dg
    Start at 1:34....Classic
    Mother should I run for president?....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mother do you think they'll try to hoax my Ballzzzz?

      Delete
    2. Oooo aaa mother should I build the wall

      Delete
    3. Look Mommy, there's an AssSquatch up in the sky...

      Delete
    4. Hush now baby baby don't you cry

      Delete
  11. Rush would be proud....where art thou Rush?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RUSH HEEM GUD,RUSH BAAND ALLSOO GUD,YOO LISSUN GUD,LIKS VAGINA GUD FOUR EERS,EET GUD,GAERLICS GUD TWO

      Delete
  12. fucking pwned like a footer with no monkey

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who? You?

      Yes I OWNED you years ago my little friend.

      I always felt sorry for you the way you raced around in your crash helmet, wearing your fluorescent pink shirt and fluorescent orange trousers, smashing into walls and running out into traffic as you attempted to board the special bus filled with your sceptard friends.

      Delete
  13. The argument "got monkey suit?" just aint gonna cut it bro.

    The burden of proof IS still on you to produce a monkey whether you like it or not.

    The wild claim is that there are thousands of monkey men living undetected alongside modern man. Saying that the PGF was a suit is NOT a wild claim, no matter how much you cry about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh you're in for it now buddy, wait'll Joe sees what you wrote...there'll be another five paragraph dissertation

      Delete
    2. ^^let me recant that...twelve paragraphs

      Delete
    3. Going over old ground and getting your ass handed to you again won't appease Sharon Shrill.

      She's not happy that her cronies are taking a pounding on a daily basis.

      The blog has been taken back.

      MMG

      Delete
    4. Who the hell is Sharon Shrill?

      Delete
    5. Some dude that wants to be a lady.No biggie.

      Delete
    6. MMG you appear to have no argument?

      Its ok dude, we all have our off days...

      Delete
    7. oh there's no question bigfoot exists, Joe has proven that beyond a shadow of a doubt...now the only thing left to discuss is how to avoid being mind-raped by one

      Delete
    8. Where is PJ anyway? We've got a real live Ohio GrassSquatch on camera here. Clear as day!

      Delete
    9. "Peace Joe" I don't do the "pwned" thing.

      Delete
    10. ok peace joe then, who incidentally is also pwned

      Delete
    11. Claiming that Patty is a guy in a suit is a fairly wild claim; I disagree with you. Since there is clearly muscle mass moving and shaking in the thigh during the stamp-stumble, there IS nothing covering that thigh. So the idea that the entire figure is in a costume is preposterous, and a wild claim.

      The burden of proof IS on you to shore up your claims about the PGF. You are the one making the claims, after all.

      You are attacking many people who have made no claims at all. They are only interested in the subject and weigh evidence. Whom are you attacking and making claims against?

      It should be easy, from what you believe, to duplicate Patty, and the film. That is not much to ask of people who think dismissively yet aggressively that it's a guy-in-suit. Since you are glib about it, producing a suit and film should be equally glibly easy for you. It should be a breeze for you.

      It is reasonable and basic to ask you to back up your wild claims by duplicating Patty and the film.

      Reminding you that Packham backed with a BBC budget and Bob Hilarious both failed severely. They failed at Ed Wood levels of laughability.

      That is a damning indictment of skeptards' claims against the PGF. You've had 46 years to do it, and failed.

      At least people interested in the subject have a film with some good evidence in it. You don't have squat. You have zilch to support a claim that Patty is a suited dude.

      You actually truly have zero. There couldn't be a weaker argument than that supported by nothingness. Why cling to the weakest argument imaginable? You have absolutely nothing at all.

      That says much in favor of the PGF, and much against the mental status and capacity of a skeptard.

      It is a demonstration of mental incapacity to be unable to see the muscle movement and shockwave through the mass of the thigh.

      Until you study that and are familar with it, you are unarmed in this argument. You need that information in order to engage in this debate. You do not have that information, so go and get it before you continue.

      Forty-six years is long enough to say Game Over for your argument. You can't produce the goods in four decades, then OK it's over for you.

      It's easier to duplicate the PGF than to catch a Sasquatch, so do it, or stop beating the dead horse, and stop being false and disingenuous in your attemmpt at argument.

      And the demand or challenge isn't Got monkey suit? It is, because of the evidence in the PGF alluded to above, Got Magical Miraculous Monkey suit? Because it will take a magic suit to duplicate whatever is in the PGF.

      Your standard ape suit obviously is not it.

      Delete
    12. The above is for Anon 2:23, if that wasn't obvious.

      Delete
    13. That is a lot of words to say hoax

      Delete
    14. Good on you Roderick! It sums up the narcissistic mental capacity of these people that they expect enthusiasts to provide research to back up their claim, when they don't have to... desperate and pathetic and they simple can't provide a suit. It gets them every time and I love it!

      Peace.
      Joe.

      Delete
    15. Roderick joins the 'Call to Arms'.

      Excellent post my friend.

      MMG

      Delete
  14. I've never seen a squatch in Ohio, but we do have way huge ground hogs. Those things are bigger that King Kong's nutsack.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. East Dayton? West Dayton is thick with em.

      Delete
    2. Hadn't been down there in twenty years. I didn't know :(

      Delete
    3. Anon 5:21. I meant west

      Delete
  15. I see a snout, so I'm saying it is of the dogman variety.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BROWN Floyd, The Dark Side of Melbas Ass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MELBUMS AAS GUD,NUT GUD VAGINA GUD BUTT EET GUD MAKS HAAPY MEE

      Delete
  17. It's Rick Dyer in a ghilly suit so it is an Ohio Assman. Missing Gr intended.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read somewhere that Rick was getting his taterhole rebuilt for the next expedition. Something about using some chrome molly steel so it holds up to all the ass pounding.

      Delete
    2. You ever notice all the Ball Scars on Ricks chin?He can hob on a knob with the best of them.That boy sure is a wild one that's for sure.I still can't get over that silly ass grin on his face when he was on his hands and knees.We kept telling him it was going to split him in two but he said KEEP DRILLING DAMMIT!!!

      Delete
    3. Is that what happened to Frank?

      Delete
    4. No.Wayne just beat the hell out of him for dropping Waynes shit Bucket.Wayne loves that bucket.When it rains he empties it out and puts it on his head to keep his hair dry.That's why there is always corn in his hair.

      Delete
    5. LMFAO!I can see Rick doing that in my mind.He looks like a'WIDE RECEIVER'!!!!

      PS. I have noticed the ball scars on his chin also.
      So that's how he makes his money in Vegas.Some people will resort to anything other than a real job.

      Delete
  18. That looks like a Dogman not a Grassman! Kinda creepy knowing those things are out there lurking in our woods..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True dat.True dat.

      Delete
    2. WEES GUD,NUT HOORTS JOE,HEEM FREEND GUD

      Delete
    3. Jamaica man, please learn to spell in English.

      Delete
  19. Poor old guy can't even pinch a loaf in the woods with out Big Brother watching him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ad big as he is I bet he had a triple coiler going on.

      Delete
  20. I live in Southern California..the grassman lives next door to me...He has a medical card so its legal for him to purchase it.dude shure does like Doritos..

    ReplyDelete
  21. where's mucklegrunt when you need him???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LONG LIVE MUCKLEGRUNT!!!
      LONG LIVE POOP IN A JAR GUY!!!
      LONG LIVE ANONY!!!
      LONG LIVE BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!


      ALL HAIL TROLLANDIA!!!

      Delete
    2. EET VAGINA GUD GUD MEE LIKS GUD,JOE LIKS GUD HEEM SMAART

      Delete
  22. I can't believe you guys can't tell that all of these images are CGI. Seriously, just watch the next episode titled :"Logan Country Devil Dog". I can't believe a Discovery channel affiliate would even fathom fooling people with this crap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The picture was taken near a trap they set for the Grassman and funneled it to that spot- It's not from a tv show or movie--if it is, then post the pict and then it's fake. Otherwise write the show and file a suit against false claims. Do something to prove or disprove--and sitting on your ass being a skeptic without even watching the show doesn't count as doing something

      Delete
    2. ^^^^^^ Tard on dumb f*ck. I've watched it, the images are CGI. Watch the show I'm referencing when it airs you dumb f*cking reject.

      Delete
    3. And by the way you degenerate, I was born and raised in Logan County for 33 years and know what would have to be close to half of the county and never once did I or anyone else I know EVER hear tell of a f*cking devil dog, except for Marines.

      This shit is CGI, just watch the upcoming show you incompetent turd.


      Delete
  23. Bill Munns made a mask and no one was able to see out of the mask, so Patty's the real deal, folks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha!!

      Also he proved that the camera shakes were authentic and not fake (what ever the fuck that means) therefore patty is the real deal folks!

      Delete
    2. Bill Munns is a damn hack and a shitty SFX artist

      Delete
    3. So says the guy that lost out on a job to Big Bill.^

      Delete
  24. That Sweet Grassy Assy gonna meet my Sweet Sticky Dicky. Get Some!

    ReplyDelete
  25. It would be nearly impossible to duplicate the PGF exactly as it appeared in the film. Why is it so hard for bigfoot proponents to accept this fact?

    The suit was a one of a kind costume made by Roger Patterson (a leather worker who worked in rodeos and who had a complete set of professional leather working tools). He not only had the skills to make a convincing suit, he also had the tools to do it.

    Without seeing the original for comparison and recreation, it would be difficult if not impossible to duplicate. What kind of padding and how much padding was used? What kind of shoulder pads were used? What type of fur was used? What was used to shape the butt? Etc. etc. There are many variables that would make the "Patty" creature difficult to duplicate exactly, let alone the exact lighting and camera work with just enough blur to not get sharp resolution.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh oh!!! Now youve done it!!! Joe and MMG are gonna be pissed!!

      Delete
    2. I feel a pwning comin' on

      Delete
    3. No no no, we don't require you to do it exactly. Only credibly.

      Bob Hilarious and Chris Hackham's attempts were incredible rather than credible.

      Come now, boys and girls, it's not too much to ask of you skeptards.

      Please, you've had four and a half decades to duplicate Patty and the PGF credibly, yet failed.

      In order to support your claims of man in a suit, you must produce the man in a suit. Since you cannot do this, obviously that is greatly in favor of the PGF. The fact that you have failed for 46 years is very good evidence for the PGF.

      It's not looking good for the skeptards.

      Delete
    4. ^^it doesn't matter how close to the original the recreation was no footer would accept it, you know it, I know and everybody on this blog knows it...

      Delete
    5. that is arguably the weakest excuse that I have ever heard. Not only does it seem you are admitting that you cannot prove in the slightest that PGF was a hoax, besides hearsay, and now after all these years and technological advances (to where we have the exact location and path in amazing 3D moveable quality) you can't find a single adamant skeptic to recreate a faithful copy of the suit and film. This is not limited to size, gait, muscle definition, natural environment appropriate hair, or the tits.

      You, sir, are pathetic.

      Delete
    6. Relax, my old man is a TV repairman. Ultimate set of tools.

      Delete
    7. You have to be kidding. The people who are "specialists" in this area of expertise can virtually recreate anything and make it look exact. That is the problem with the PG "costume" everyone claims is out there. There has been numerous attempts to recreate the costume with horrible, almost laughable results. (BBC, Monsterquest, etc. have attempted) Roger Patterson has went from an out of work rodeo cowboy to an expert in CGI and makeup artist on this site.

      Delete
    8. Blah blah blah blah blah. The skeptics have to prove everything. How bout this you fat hillbilly moron......provide something tangible. You blab on about recreating a one off. How about you provide something that is real. Not on tape it recording, but real. You can't. You can't and you never will so suck it you retarded footer. You go off on a tangent hoping that your writing and English skills will discourage a response with your blab about people recreating a crap film. Here's the deal..... If that film is something real...YOU PROVE IT. Skeptics are in the right to not believe because skepticism comes from wanting hard solid proof. Which you don't have. So jog on with your crap about recreating a forty year old video, and start using TODAY'S technology to find something that as of yet, just does not 100% exist in one rational person's mind.

      Delete
    9. Anon 2:52pm is definitely mad. Like real mad. How'd you get so mad, bro?

      It seems to me that the group of people who produced the PGF and who support the notion of an existing hominid are the ones constantly on the search for the creature.

      They do the leg work and take the risks, while harassing skeptics sit at the luxury of their Starbucks table with free wifi trying to hate themselves less than they normally do by anonymously calling people names and surfing countless forums, blogs, and websites creating drama, back stories, movie scenes, and other accounts to continue the fray when no one else is biting.

      You call footers pathetic, fat, lazy, and idiotic but look at you, you just got legitimately angry on a comment section about bigfoot.

      Skeptic meet mirror, mirror meet skeptic.

      Delete
    10. Where is your evidence that patterson made a suit?

      Delete
  26. Yes, I would just like to say that all this arguing is incredible to me. If you don't wish to believe that Bigfoot or the Grassman or any other creature of legend is real, why do you watch these shows? If people wish to believe that there is the possibility of Bigfoot, then that is their initiative. If you still want to watch the show, why get on here and argue with people you know will not agree with you?

    I know that you have your rights in not believing that Bigfoot exists but that doesn't mean that you should try to take away from the experience for the rest of us. There is always the possibility that more evidence may show up, but in order to find that evidence, we must look for it. Even in the circumstance that this show really is fake, it gives us something to look at for further comparison.

    I believe that the world has many possibilities and things are never fully disproven. It may seem unbelievable but not disproven. There was once a time that black holes were thought to be impossible. New species of all kinds of creatures are discovered often. Some were found last year.

    In addition, I would just like to say that it is insulting to say that all people who enjoy these shows are fat and dumb. I happen to be neither. Several of the people that have commented on the behalf of other "footers" certainly do not sound that way either. Neither is my father nor my sixteen year old brother. As for making jokes about people's moms, that is a part of the culture at the moment. More people than just Bigfoot watchers use those.

    We are not talking about the tooth fairy so that is hardly relevant. I didn't even think about Rick Dyer's site until you mentioned it and I wouldn't really care if someone knew I looked at it. Therefore, it wouldn't be secret and if people do look at it, that is their business. As for a job, at the moment, I'm in college for English, so I assure you that the list you put up is not too much for me to read. My father certainly can keep a job, as he has done so for approximately twenty-five years, and is a teacher. The list continues. And before you comment that a "footer" made a list also, a "skeptard" put one up first. Any list or statement after would be in retaliation.

    Basically, if you have nothing positive to say about the topic of Bigfoot, please take it somewhere else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brilliant post sir! Post more often!!
      Peace.
      Joe.

      Delete
    2. Well said.! I applaud you sir.If you are ever in south west fla.I would like to hook up on a local on going investigation with your famly.I often venture with my 2 sons.You are more than welcome to come. I am not afraid to say I am a Sasquatch hunter.

      Delete
    3. Shut up. You dumb footer. And your dad loves sucking dingy.

      Delete
  27. Replies
    1. Hey joe, you are also welcome to join in the hunt. Peace back at you.. Your cut man in your corner steve.

      Delete
  28. Whether its a hoax or not, this picture was on a TV show just recently (i can't think of the name of the show) where 5-6 guys built a pit to try to run bigfoot into it. They set up a tree cam to take this picture. The grassman was moving so quickly that the camera only managed to get one frame of him.
    Anyway my point isnt that these pictures are real or fake that's not for me to decided but this is no "DOG-MAN" this is a photo of a moving object from the backside so the close-up of this picture is not a face; rather the back of the "whatever's" head

    ReplyDelete
  29. For me that show is entertaining, but fishy. They always "get their monster". Unlike monsterquest which comes up empty handed as one would expect - an elusive creature is not going to be findable in a two day expedition... you'd not find a bear or deer in that amount of time - Mountain monsters always gets their monster.

    The carrying of rifles and shotguns is silly and actually would not be legal in certain places.

    ReplyDelete