Sasquatch Ontario Guy Releases Photos of Eyes, Plus Typical Boring Recordings of Bigfoot Speech
Since Bigfoot speech has become so common in Ontario, we're just not as excited about it as we should be. That's why when we watched this latest video from Mike P., we were completely blown away with shots of eyes deeply looking into our soul. Can we say we are one with this spirit, or do we feel cold and all alone. For what a man is or a woman, so shall their offspring be.... Okay. Enough hippie talk, it's probably just an owl...
last
ReplyDelete...anti-firsting only allowed...
DeleteAre we sure the ontario guy is not a FBFB guy cuz hes sounds a lot like them
Delete11:32 is a closet firster..Do you think it makes you less of an asshole grabbing the top spot to frustrate firsters? It doesn't you know; you are still trying to be first...lol..
Delete^ HA!! nice
DeleteLooks like a walleye or pike eye to me. This cat is just TRYING to our hoax that meth head Dyer, ain't gonna happen, Ricky sure do love him some shake and bake and when you don't sleep it's damn hard to wake up before him.
DeleteThe first two are definitely fish eyes, the others are owl? Maybe a carebear? Maybe even one of Todd Standings muppets... Of course they have a picture of an ear but they WON'T release it. (HUGE surprise) AND if the hoaxing land owner leaves his video camera running how come we don't get to see the video camera picked up? OR am I to believe OntSas is leaving his video camera and the hoaxing land owner is leaving a photo camera? I see, Sasquatch is quite skilled in photography as well as mind melds.
Delete^^^12:45, Nah, I'm just holding a grudge against a few loser firsters that pushed me too far.
DeletePush me push you oh yeah says who
Delete^ No problem 1:17, I was only kidding...
DeleteWalleye or Pike? Never seen eyes like that on either species. First pic does look to be some type of fish.
DeleteThose are the eyes of a stuffed animal. I think it's Teddy Ruxpin.
DeleteTeddy Ruxpin is terrifying!
DeleteI am a fish taxidermist and those eyes are fish eyes. The only eye that I know of to be tear drop shaped. The teardropped shape pupil always looks forward in a fish.
DeleteI JUST WANT TO SEE A PHOTO OF A HOT BABES BROWNEYE. IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?????
ReplyDeleteAin't nothing like a beautiful taterhole.
Deletefirst
ReplyDeletedang it should have refreshed.....
Delete^fantastically embarrassing false first, congrats!!
DeleteThe first two photo's are Fish eyes for crying out loud !! The others were taken with a camera but he says they left a Camcorder running on the ground and went back an hour later and this is what was on it.FULL of SH#% if you ask me just like his recordings of a Bigfoot saying his name.
ReplyDeleteWho cares who's on first?
ReplyDeleteSlap that mosquito... Won't release the ear photo yet.... Means there isn't a photo of an ear.
As b the ol big guy himself would say, : Grrr yah yah ooohhh yah naaa na na naaa na na. YAH!!!"
Yes, it's to much to ask... you'll get a fish eye, and like it. !
ReplyDeleteA little birdie told me that Bigfoot will be proven to exist in the next few days.
ReplyDeleteThats what you said yesterday so wouldn't be in a couple of days now?
DeleteBuckle up !
DeleteI like turtles
Deletesasquatch obviously holding fish up to the camera
ReplyDeletecase closed.
They are so clever.
5th!
ReplyDeleteMongo just pawn...in game of life...
ReplyDeleteNo, Mongo straight!
DeleteHey, Faggot Travis... How you been girl?
DeleteLOL, Nice goldfish eyeball.
ReplyDeleteWe can photograph only something soooo closeup you can barely tell its a body part, and its ambiguous.
DeleteOR
It's so far away its blurry as fuck or obscured by debris.
NO
You may not have any plain old regular photographs of the beast. It is not possible. Sorry! No soup for you!!!
:D
That Tardfoot has pinkeye
ReplyDeleteWow... that was some brave soul who took his shoes off and walked through the snow...
ReplyDeletewhy don't you just edit the filming up till the real deal, this gets a little boring!
ReplyDeleteand why is the last photo cropped
Deletebecause the source of the material if a fucking lunatic. he probably isn't smart enough to edit it.
DeleteJust think if he had a fish eye lens and took a pic of a fish eye .... Mind Blown
Deletewebsite just got changed to Fisheye Evidence dot com
ReplyDeleteIt's preety much a conclusion that this dude is full of shit. He is getting exactly what he wants when you keep on posting about him. Let him go away by NOT giving him the attention he wants. At this point BE is the bigger idiot becuase they continue to feed him.
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you cry about it, you whiny bitch
DeleteOntSas is the best thing going in the bigfoot world right now...
Delete12:12..Shawn posts everything bigfoot related he finds on the web(unless permission is denied) and lets the readers hash it out: the site is more or less a hub....
DeleteIs this guy related to Todd Standing?
ReplyDeleteLast time I checked eyeballs don't reflect light. And one of those is surely a fish eye. This is all a practical joke
ReplyDeleteDon't complain or ask questions........he's a professional.
ReplyDeleteEyes dilated and bloodshot, slurred and incomprehensible speech ... that Bigfoot is smoking crack
ReplyDeleteNo no no, Rick Dyer is the Bigfoot Community druggie. That dude is so tweaked out he ain't slept for a week. The Team Tracker mile said it wasn't coke, but run of the mill methamphetamine. Ricky sure do love him some shake and bake...
DeleteI got a date with a HOT BABE tonight. She is really into spiders. She told me she wants to show me her Brown Recluse.
ReplyDeleteFrom Mike Sells' playbook.
ReplyDeleteStupid saturday night hoaxers.
Mike P. Honestly thinks he can outsmart all the skeptics and the bigfoot believers with this garbage.
ReplyDeleteWhen he was planning all these hoaxes (two years ago) He thought it would have fooled many more people than it has.
He expected to have been on Finding Bigfoot by now. That was the original goal. He is losing more and more credibility with each video release.
He will disappear before the end of this summer.
You know he was planning this two years ago, how?
DeleteRegardless of when he planned this, he over did it for sure and "discovered" too much in too short of time...The honest guys that look for these things all say any kind of trace evidence is rarely found(possible prints and hairs)..Sounds, visuals and thermals that may be bigfoots are also few and far between...
DeleteHence, there will be many advocates and believers that will dismiss the group when pressed, and nothing gets claims sent to the trash heap faster than that...
Yeah, loses me also with this release, primarily because he claims long running video and limits this to single frames. No real good reason for that, but to conceal. Awwwh shucks.
ReplyDeleteHe (they) expected bigfooters to be much more naive.
DeleteThey thought it would be easy to have all you guys eating out of his hand and worshipping the ground he walks on by now.
Kudos to all of you guys who are not gullible.
^
DeleteEven a bigfooter like you weren't fooled. Good job for a simpleton like yourself.
Shouldn't this read "wasn't fooled?"
DeleteRight for some weird reason a response that I am trying to post in a debate I am having with a gentleman back on the 'These Photos Are The Reason Why I'll Never Going Into The Woods Alone' page, is not working when I go back to check on it... If anyone can help me with why then that would be very helpful? But for all of you who know me; I simply have to respond so firstly I apologize to all on this page for the irrelevance of this post and secondly if that gentleman is about; here is my intended response to you that I have repeatedly been posting since this morning (British standard time)...
ReplyDelete"Barnum used the museum as a platform to promote hoaxes and human curiosities such as the 'Feejee mermaid' and 'General Tom Thumb'. He was an American showman, businessman and entertainer, remembered for promoting celebrated hoaxes for the circus that became the Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey Circus. Barnum wrote several books, founded a weekly newspaper before moving to New York City in 1834 where he embarked on an entertainment career, but there is not one shred of evidence to support the claim that he initiated any of his hoaxing methods through the printed news media of the time... This is inaccurate and does not explain the consistency found right across the States from different newspapers that would not have had the level of inter-state communication of today. Comparing this to elaborate circus acts doesn't really prove anything.
The top ten hoaxes of the time that you so kindly supplied me were great but what bearing do several hoaxed letters, a drawing by a parish priest, a prank by a novelist, a monkey butt, pregnancy by a bullet, a giant potato, on reports of giant skeletons in burial mounds? Put these in comparison to the detail and consistency of the accounts of giant skeletons and giant wild men that the first pioneers of the country reported and a lot of the accounts taken and published by the news media of the time were taken from settlers diaries who branched out to the Western United States... none had the conception of what this was and were all reporting the same thing and had no geographical link to one another whilst it is consistent with thousands of years of native culture also.
The Jako story being dismissed really doesn't matter to be honest... I don't know if I believe in it either, the story is too vague to really say, but the fact that some in the Bigfoot do not buy it is irrelevant; some enthusiasts dismiss Patty, it's not to say they know what they're on about and get contended with regularly.
Teddy Roosevelt had a first hand experience and this is probably news to you.
Like I said about Melba; Oxford have taken on the study now, so we will wait and see who comes out on top about that. Sykes' movements in the last few months are not that of someone who has a cynical opinion on the subject and the fact that he has taken notice and decided to replicate the study can be played down by yourself if you wish, but does not change the the fact that science has begun to ask the questions... the start of any scientific anthropological study.
Did Stan Winston actually dedicate any time to analyzing the creature in PGF? I thought he just lent his opinion?? Oh... that obviously trumps thorough analysis now does it??? I stand corrected on the logic of skepticism. Find me an expert that can counter Munns' research or it just stands as opinion... a very credible opinion, but nothing compared to thorough analysis of another expert.
Bigfoot tracks that have been hoaxed have nothing on the detail of dermal ridging I'm afraid... you can have a look at examples on the internet if you wish. You offer nothing to counter the locations these tracks are attained from.
Again, apologies all for the irrelevance.
Peace all.
Joe,you write like an American.
DeleteThe gig is up.You started out writing like you're from across the pond but you have since written like an American.
What gives,Joe?
;-)
The spell check on this blog doesn't let me use British spell check for some reason? I think I can actually spell like an American now though... Not a bad thing of course!
DeletePeace cousin across the pond.
Peace Joe.
DeleteRoosevelt did not have a first hand experience, but was told about one by someone he trusted enough to put the account in his book.
DeleteYou are correct grasshopper!
DeleteStan Winston is playing it safe. He doesn't want to make an ass out of himself like he did with the "Alien Autopsy" hoax. If he really thinks it's a suit, he should be able to recreate it right?
DeleteActually! I have gone over my source in which I attained that information on Roosevelt and it is in fact not entirely reliable, I am therefore in agreement. However, his endorsement of such a creature, with his understanding & experience of the outdoors, speaks for itself I feel.
DeletePeace all!
Clueless Joe, you sound so gay.
DeleteReally? You sound like a pussy making statements like that anonymously. Cheers.
DeleteShaun said "It's probably just an owl"...
ReplyDeleteTo which I say: But there's no place for the owl to be!
I've been tracking sasquatches for 25 years.
DeleteI keep my poop in a jar.
ReplyDeleteIt looks legit to me.
ReplyDeleteIt's a batting donut up the ol' taterhole! National pasttime you dig.
ReplyDeleteI keep my poop in Patty's diaper...Can't ya tell?
ReplyDeleteThis place is littered with morons who couldn't find their way out of a closet.
ReplyDeleteThe tent in this video looks like the tent in the tent video! Sasquatch Ontario Guy is actually Rick Dyer!
ReplyDeleteThe first image is an eye of an amphibian or phish. There are also some pics of avian eyes as well. Still no monkey though. Date: July 15 2013
ReplyDeleteA "PHISH"? I would like to see a PHISH.. Wow, this site has em all.. Wow!
DeleteWhen I hear those noises an image of a person stricken with Down Syndrome comes to mind. A genuine Footard!
ReplyDeleteplease- this was never the recordings of a real Ontario squatch because it never said "eh"
ReplyDeletecase closed !
Sadly. This was only one of the two eyes of the late great Marty Feldman. May he rest in peace, Joe.
ReplyDeleteEye photo is probably a Canadian owl, Eh? Google it and you will find red, yellow and blue surrounding the pupil.
ReplyDeleteYou retards are ALL moron's. I read what you write about this guy and you're ALL so jealous, it's not funny at all how stupid you all sound. What else is funny is how you say that the Sasquatch Ontario eye is an OWL EYE, when in fact it IS NOT an Owl eye, there are differences. The Owl eye DOES NOT have a strictly defined RING of RED, then YELLOW around it. And, OWLS'S DO NOT HAVE FINGERS IDIOTS, so they cannot take pictures. Secondly, the fact you reference the Owl is quite interesting as OWL's can see in the DARK obviously like the Sasquatch, so let's all ponder what has been said here, perhaps they have Eye's very similar to Owl's clearly like this shows. You People are such cowards.
ReplyDeleteOwls scare me - especially when they ask "who"
Deleteand all I can say is "I don't know" while running away hoping I don't stain my panties
Well said, the people on this site are ignorant jealous morons. And so is the site owner. It's pathetic. When Mike P delivers more on this, the naysayers will be left in the dust. The rest of us will be laughing.
DeleteTell us more Mike S.
Deletethe eye pictured in this blog post is either a bubble eyed goldfish or a regular goldfish, definitely not a sasquatch eye.
ReplyDeleteAnd your scientific, photographic, and forensic evidence to make this statement is?
DeleteAdios.
Sasquatch Ontario who is Ontario Sasquatch who is Skookum who is proudfreemason who is Toejam who is Drakaland who has even more aliases so......
ReplyDelete....no matter how you do the math or factor in all the other a.k.a's, the sum total equals = bullshit.