There's a difference between terrible quality suits and Patty. Therefore when you can't back up the claims that the "best footage of BF" is a suit it diminishes your claims. At least people are out there trying to prove the existence of Sasquatch. You are just cranky that Joe shafts you on a regular basis and you ALWAYS fall into the circular logic arguments because you'reeeeee aaaa fffaaaaggggoootttt!
Correcto 6:54. Anon 6:00 is misreporting the argument about the PGF anyway. He/she is mixed up. The requirement is if you cry hoax on the PGF, you need to credibly duplicate Patty. Considering the many details in the PGF, the hair wear patterns, the spinal erectors, the moving muscle mass and tendon in the thigh, it's going to take one magical miraculous mysterious mythical monkey man suit to replicate what is seen in the PGF.
They haven't got it, they've got 46 years of failure under their belts, 46 years is long enough, it's game-set-match in favor of the PGF. We can't say 100% what is in that film, but it is game-set-match as far as being unable to show it was a hoax. That effort has been a 100% failure. How long do we give them? Another 46 years? I think it's over.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
First....
ReplyDeleteUp yours
I like aggressive, confident firsting.
DeleteNo remorse. No repent.
MMG
"With pleasure!" - James Randi
DeleteWe don't care what it meant.
DeleteThat's Da Spirit!
ReplyDeleteBoring Friday night, Phil? Not everything needs a goddamn breakdown.
ReplyDeleteLike we need a breakdown to know that this Chinese tourists video is BS.
ReplyDeletePhil, if you can't produce the suit, then it's a real bigfoot.
ReplyDelete-Joe
There's a difference between terrible quality suits and Patty. Therefore when you can't back up the claims that the "best footage of BF" is a suit it diminishes your claims. At least people are out there trying to prove the existence of Sasquatch. You are just cranky that Joe shafts you on a regular basis and you ALWAYS fall into the circular logic arguments because you'reeeeee aaaa fffaaaaggggoootttt!
DeleteCorrecto 6:54. Anon 6:00 is misreporting the argument about the PGF anyway. He/she is mixed up. The requirement is if you cry hoax on the PGF, you need to credibly duplicate Patty. Considering the many details in the PGF, the hair wear patterns, the spinal erectors, the moving muscle mass and tendon in the thigh, it's going to take one magical miraculous mysterious mythical monkey man suit to replicate what is seen in the PGF.
DeleteThey haven't got it, they've got 46 years of failure under their belts, 46 years is long enough, it's game-set-match in favor of the PGF. We can't say 100% what is in that film, but it is game-set-match as far as being unable to show it was a hoax. That effort has been a 100% failure. How long do we give them? Another 46 years? I think it's over.
Totally agree,no doubt Pattys the real thing.
DeleteYou try to take a dump, chinese tourists with cameras appear every time.
ReplyDeleteGreat job as always Phil, you rock!
ReplyDeleteMitchell.
Really! Even Stevie Wonder can 'SEE' that its a dildo in a ghillie.
DeleteTEAM HOMOS!
ReplyDeleteJoe says if you can't find the suit then its Sasquatch. Yes, that's just how RETARDED Clueless Joe is.
ReplyDeleteOnce again a dumbass skeptic misses the main thrust of the argument.
DeleteDifficult to debate with morons who can't keep up.
MMG