BigfootWeekend September Expedition

Thursday, July 11, 2013

It's Official: Todd Standing Will Be Les Stroud's Bigfoot Guide


It's confirmed! Todd Standing is finally joining forces with Survivorman, Les Stroud. It was just merely an idea on the Joe Rogan show last year when Les expressed interest in hunting for Bigfoot, and now a reality. With Standing's superior knowledge of sasquatch territorial behavior, and Les Stroud's survival skills, our hunch is that the team will probably go deeper into the forest farther than any researcher will ever go. Two years ago, Standing, while hunting for Sasquatch deep in the rugged back country of the Kootenays (where, he claimed he was about to infiltrate a "Bigfoot domicile"), his plans were ruined after a grizzly bear encounter forced him to radio for rescue. Fortunately for standing, this time he no longer has to go into to woods alone since he will have Survivorman by his side. According to Metro News, Standing and Les are planning expeditions in 3 hot zones, including an area in northern Montana where Standing recently had an encounter. Here's what Standing told Metro News Canada:

“It’s been a hard sell on his behalf, but it’s all greenlit and we’re going to get it done,” said Standing, who claims he’s come within 65 metres of Bigfoot-like creatures and has devoted his life to validating claims the species exists.
[...]
Standing said the key will be for him to get the attention of the primates, who he said are dominant and keep track of all their intruders into their areas, and then draw them back to Stroud.

“I want him to come out of there saying ‘Bigfoot is real, and this guy is really studying and researching them,’ ” Standing said.


168 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. This looks to be Cornerstone Evidence in the early stages of making history. This could be bigger that any DNA study and the P-G film put together. At last, Jimmy Carter will have been proven right when he stated on national TV shortly within a week of leaving office, that "Bigfoot are real, they are a type of people".

      Delete
    2. Since the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that work the border crossings, are concerned about a discover of Bigfoot in Canada as having an adverse affect on tourism, I wonder what role they intend to take in this. Mmmmmmm?

      Delete
    3. Please bitch! Standing?

      Delete
    4. I hear ya, that flake Todd Standing is geared more for that fake ass Bear Grylls. Les Stroud is a muther fruggin bad ass, his guide should be One of the following:

      Rick Dyer (then throw him of a cliff)
      Tim Fasano (he needs the exercise)
      MK Davis (he can take his beeping smoke alarm)
      Justin Smeja (bring a body bag)

      Delete
    5. Two men enter.

      One man leaves.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. It's very cool. Since Stroud is gullible enough to throw in with Fraud Standing, I have some land in Florida I'd be happy to sell him!

      Delete
    2. I'll be in Oregon the next couple weeks. Does anyone know of any good areas with recent Squatch activity?

      Delete
    3. As long as Standing refers to these beings as animals he'll continue to be viewed a fraud. Maybe he's actually part of the cover-up, by pretending to be looking but really working for the Canadian Government technically under US order in these matters like most big nations.

      Delete
    4. FRAUD STANDING, How can people keep falling for frauds like Standing. This will destroy Les Stroud for all time. What next Les, a Paranormal Channeler to transport you to one of the moons of Jupiter to film your next episode. Show us how to eat dirt and live in temperatures 150 below zero. Isn't the term when a television personality gets desperate and films a FAKE episode, JUMP the SHARK. Les, you just jumped the Whale.

      Delete
    5. Les Stroud claims to have two personal bigfoot type experiences. That is why he is willing to go look.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. I'm disappointed too, eh.

      Delete
    2. Travis you seem to be under the impression that there are more "legit" footers...


      All footers that put forward evidence are either hoaxers or insane. Yes all of them.

      Delete
    3. 2:10's mother abandoned him as a child. I had a 35 y/o roommate who was the same way. Turns out he was constantly searching for that live and attention his mother never felt the urge to give him.

      Delete
    4. Henry May?? Really, Travis??!!

      Delete
    5. ^^no matter what kind of asinine things you say about 2:10 you know damn good and well he's right...

      Delete
    6. Looks like the footards are pwned yet again. Their complete lack of monkey is a real killer for them huh.

      Delete
    7. Travis it just brightens my day to see your avatar.

      Delete
    8. Travis, the casting of Standing shows once again these TV producers could not give a rats ass who the community thinks is honest or not...Guys like Standing and Dyer know that. They just have to get their names in a rolodex(by any means) and wait for the calls.....

      Delete
    9. Not a single footer is honest so why does it matter? Choose anyone, they are all peddling the same lies.

      Delete
    10. ^ Not saying everyone on the tube is a hoaxer: you can get a name by being active and\or creating bigfoot related content. Ro Sahebi is the most recent example that comes to mind...

      Delete
    11. Well, if someone concludes( I can't see how with this evidence) that bigfoots definitely exist, that does not make them liars if they are wrong...I agree though that there are many cases of people pushing evidence that they realize is crap....

      Delete
    12. Todd Standing is a fraud and a hoaxer.

      Can we assume that Standing is taking Stroud to his Sylvanic valley where those ewoks live?

      Embarrassing for everyone concerned.

      MMG

      Delete
    13. Those ewok pictures were aweful!! those pics ruined it for him. I do like his passion and drive. I personally think the video he had on Finding Bigfoot was real though.

      Delete
    14. It's TV. They're looking for ratings, not bigfoot.

      Delete
    15. At the very least it will be entertaining. That's what its all about I suppose

      Delete
    16. He can't fit between the trees.

      Delete
  4. Where the hell is Fozzie its time for the Muppet Show

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's with the rest of the Muppets waiting to do their hide behind rocks routine for Standing and his camera

      Delete
    2. Me and the rest of the Muppet union are going to picket Todd and his scab muppets!

      BIG FUZZY HUGS BIATCH!!!!!

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Oh! You must have got a suit then?!

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. These two pairing up; research or ratings? Discuss...

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. Plenty of suits to create any creature imaginable. The suit used in the pgf is seen in the pgf. Still waiting for that monkey.

      Still zero evidence and you know it.

      Delete
    4. So you have the monkey suit???!!!!!!

      Peace.

      Delete
    5. There is no need to create a suit replication of a one off suit tailored by the craftsman patterson. Science says the solution to the pgf is a man in a suit. You've had 50 years to produce a similar film or get a specimen that matches what we see in the pgf but have you? Not a chance.

      Delete
    6. Yeah... a rookie film maker, came up with a 'suit' that cannot be replicated 46 years later with such significant advances in technology as we have today? Great logic!! The materials required to make such realism were not available to the general public in the late 60's. There is a great need to replicate a 'suit', because if you can't; the creature is real and you lose.

      ... Got monkey suit???

      Peace.

      Delete
    7. Realism? That static turtle shell like diaper butt with legs moving seperately underneath with that horrendous thigh subduction... yea realistic... lol. Stop giving patterson so much credit his suit wasnt THAT good. The only people he fooled are the dumb footers that are desperate to believe, and guess what it worked and still works to this day.

      Delete
    8. Oh, and Anon 3;13...

      Explain the extended toes in the step... Your claim that the body is static, is just a desperate claim and is not what I see when I see it.

      Peace.

      Delete
    9. "Got monkey suit?" Is that really the only argument you have because its a complete Facepalm.

      Delete
    10. He's running from you Joe.

      Delete
    11. Tell me about it! They contradictively cling to the 'myth' that Patty is a suit... and then claim we enthusiasts have an interest in supposedly just that. Prove Patty is a suit, or the creature is real, IT'S REALLY QUITE SIMPLE.

      Peace.

      Delete
    12. Joe dodges every single argument, can provide no monkey and can provide no valid reason why there's no monkey.

      Delete
    13. The only plausible explanation is that Roger Patterson, the super duper leather craftsman rodeo champion amatuer filmmaker invented Velcro, Spandex, stretch fur, depends, mechanical toes, muscle definition, and spongebob square pants.

      Delete
    14. ^Ah the delusions of a footer. Its almost shameless.

      Delete
    15. HA HA HA HA!! Exactly!

      Hey Anon 3:45...

      What arguments do I dodge exactly? Put them to me and I'll school you, like I love doing every time you ignorant people comment on this blog. YOU SIR, fail to bring anything except your opinion to the debate and I can deliver so much more.

      Since you appear to have all the answers and wildlife biologists conduct much of their research on tracks and prints, explain first time casting, from opposite sides of the country, decades apart that show a consistency in dermal ridging identifiable by an expert in human AND primate prints in Jimmy Chilcutt? Chilcutt; 54, is an expert fingerprint technician at the Conroe Police Department. He is highly regarded by agents of the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and state and local law enforcement agencies for his innovative techniques and ability to find fingerprints where others fail. His opinion puts people in prison for a very long time and your ignorant opinion comes up second best to someone like that I'm afraid.

      Any one who has spent ten minutes looking into numerous casts can see that there are many, many first time prints that have a similarity in style of dermal ridging in the same way that two sets of finger prints from opposite sides of the country would look similar in style at first, regardless of apparent uniqueness under analysis. These casts cannot be explained away with desiccation because they have scar tissue and toe bending that many people who have done proper analysis have sited as the creature gripping into earth. There is a clear difference between desiccation marks and complex dermal markings, you can look for yourself on any image search engine. Some have sited casts that have been made poorly by amateur casters (these are mostly untrained civilian researchers, not perfectionists)as the main source to disprove such casts and this is at best desperate and ignorant of the wider picture of the sometimes difficult process it is to extract such prints. What a one in a billion lottery win that would be to somehow get the same pattern decades apart from opposite sides of the country?! Explain casts that are attained 40 miles into the interior of wilderness areas? The hoaxers would have to be either psychic or mind controllers to predict to the exact yard where the researchers are going to be to the exact moment eh?

      Peace.

      Delete
    16. 'Exactly' was in response to Anon 3:46.

      Peace.

      Delete
    17. Harvey Pratt; reported to be the best forensic artist in the country, has the ability to take off fake beards, sunglasses, hats etc, of bank robbers & such... his final sketch of Patty has Native features. His opinion and expertise sends bad people to prison for a very long time... credible?

      Harvey Pratt's Resume -

      EDUCATION
      Saint Patrick's Indian Mission, Anadarko, Oklahoma
      Graduate - High School

      Central State University, Edmond, Oklahoma

      University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

      Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
      Associates Degree - Police Science

      MILITARY EXPERIENCE
      United States Marine Corps 1962 – 1965
      Served in Vietnam, Air Rescue and Da Nang Air Base Security

      EXPERIENCE
      Midwest City Police Department 1965 - 1972
      Patrol Division, Investigative Division

      Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation 1972 - Present
      Agent I to Assistant Director and Interim Director: Narcotics; Criminal Investigations; Administration; and Criminal Records and Information Divisions

      SPECIAL TRAINING
      Federal Bureau of Investigation National Academy – 1981

      Southwestern School of Polygraph, Houston, Texas

      U.S. Secret Service Dignitary Protection

      Kobetz’s Dignitary Protection

      U.S. Secret Service Questioned Document School

      Federal Task Force

      Advanced Law Enforcement Certification

      HIGH PROFILE INVESTIGATIONS
      Sirloin Stockade Murders – Roger Dale Stafford, Verna Stafford & Harold Stafford case

      Oklahoma Girl Scout Murders – Gene Leroy Hart case

      Green River Killer – Gary Ridgeway, serial murderer

      BTK (Bind, Torture and Kill) Killer – Dennis Rader, serial murderer

      I-5 (Interstate 5) Killer – Randall Woodfield, serial murderer

      Bobby Joe Long – serial murderer

      Oklahoma State Fair Abducted Girls – Roy Russell Long case

      Ted Bundy – serial murderer

      Joe Fischer – serial murderer

      World Trade Center 1993 Bombings – investigation

      Oklahoma City Bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building – investigation

      Randolph Dial – fugitive

      Henry Lee Lucas and Ottis Toole – serial murderers

      Tommy Ward and Karl Fontenot – murder case

      Roger Wheeler Murder – Winter Hill Gang case – James J. "Whitey" Bulger, Stephen Flemmi and Johnny Martorano

      Osama Bin Laden – terrorist (photo alteration)

      Tommy Lynn Sells – serial murderer

      Donald Eugene Webb – FBI Top Ten Fugitive list

      The Weather Underground Organization

      BOARDS, ASSOCIATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS - PAST AND PRESENT
      Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation Hall of Fame – Inductee

      Oklahoma Law Enforcement Hall of Fame – Board Member

      Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes Judicial Commission

      Red Earth Festival’s “2005 Honored One”

      Oklahoma Creativity Project – Board Member

      Regional Organized Crime Information Center (ROCIC) – Chairman

      Oklahoma Arts Council – Board Member

      Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribal College Board of Education – Board of Regents

      Oklahoma Native American Law Enforcement Association – President

      District Attorney’s Council

      OSBI Retired Agents Association - Secretary/Treasurer

      Oklahoma Sheriff and Peace Officer's Association

      Oklahoma Sheriff’s Association

      Oklahoma Indian Commission – Coordinator

      Oklahoma Historical Society – Native American Advisory Board

      Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit (LEIU)

      Federal Bureau of Investigation National Academy

      Cheyenne Cultural Center - Cheyenne Justice Committee

      Seminole Junior College - Law Enforcement Advisory Board

      Oklahoma Women In Law Enforcement – Honorary Lifetime Member

      Native American Cultural & Education Authority – Advisory Committee

      Delete
    18. ... So if this guy's opinion states that the creature in PGF has a real face and not a mask, you will have to come up with something quite special to counter that... Wouldn't you??

      Delete
    19. The footprints thing is a massive joke in footery. Hundreds of them in all shapes and sizes. No definative pattern indicating an actual species. Just individuals ideas of what a hoaxed print should look like when they create their stompers.

      Meldrum sells casts that were taken by a proven hoaxer. That tells you all you need to know about footery. If you are willing to accept its no biggie then you are on your own lost in your fantasy world of magic wood apes and noone can help you.

      Heres a question that was never answered:

      Please explain the film processing timeline, where and when it was processed and how long it took. Thanks.

      Delete
    20. It's easy; the whole timeline isn't possible to confirm. This is a brilliant example of what people like you are reduced to, instead of countering the evidence we have.

      "The footprints thing is a massive joke in footery. Hundreds of them in all shapes and sizes. No definative pattern indicating an actual species. Just individuals ideas of what a hoaxed print should look like when they create their stompers."

      ... Prove it. Prove my points about prints to be wrong or at least bring me an expert opinion that will counter my points... Your opinion really doesn't cut it I'm afraid.

      Peace.

      Delete
    21. "Impossible to confirm" yep you just summed up your own arguments. Pwned.

      Delete
    22. If anyone says they confirm the pgf is not a mask then they are delusional and lying. There is nowhere near enough detail to confirm either way. But the complete lack of monkey leads us nicely to favour that it is a mask.

      Delete
    23. Anon 4:20...
      'Impossible to confirm', meaning whatever here-say and rumors you use to try and dismiss it are inaccurate (duh?!)

      Anon 4:26...
      Sorry, it's 'anonymous you' v Harvey Pratt. You'll need to bring me more than that I'm afraid.

      Oh... and no monkeys, just giant hairy people... Got monkey mask??

      Peace.

      Delete
    24. Anon 4:20 is like Bagdad Bob. He just keep repeating the same crap when it's obvious to all of us he's a complete idiot. He keeps asking for answers and Joe has answered each and every single one with sources and experts., He looks for one typo or misplaced word to try and get Joe in a screw up just to brow beat him. Village Idiot has run out of options except to look for spelling errors and mis-steps. LOL! Let me ask you a question Village Idiot-- Do you even read Joe's Stuff or do you just repeat worn out crap that is set on auto response? I have never seen a person corrected so many times and made to look stupid as you and you keep coming back for more. Stop with the stupid "Got Monkey" crap because you know Joe doesn't have a body. When he does you'll be the first Moron he will call so in the meantime STFU!

      Delete
    25. You pasting some guys resume makes bigfoot real? Thats the same logic sweaty yeti uses by which a smiley face at the end of a forum post makes bigfoot real.

      Your arguments are weak and you avoid all the major problems, the main one being the complete and ultimate undeniable lack of a monkey.

      Every single thing that happens in footery can be explained by no monkey.

      No trail cam photos. No monkey.

      No body. No monkey.

      No dna. No monkey.

      No fossils. No monkey.

      Every single hyped up announcement that results in nothing. No monkey.

      3 seasons of finding bigfoot. No monkey.

      No unambiguous films or photos. No monkey.

      Numerous hoaxers. No monkey.

      No monkey. No monkey.

      Dont let the door hit you on the way out joe.

      Delete
    26. So we can create exact replicas of everything from priceless art and artifacts, recreate what gigantopithicus looked like from a jawbone and a molar, and you can't even come up with anything but a laughable attempt at recreating the suit or the film. You are however inclined to believe someone like bob h and his suit? Or that terrible bbc suit?

      Delete
    27. Noone is trying. Noone gives a fuck.

      Delete
    28. What's the probability of every single Bigfoot witness is lying? Zero! Everyone lies about it is the most ridiculous statement ever recorded on this site!!!!! It's laughable and that dude wants us to take him serious! LMFAO!

      Delete
    29. Correct it is zero. Misidentification makes up the rest.

      Delete
    30. Anon 4:43...

      I'm not sure if you are cognitive enough but the CV speaks for his credibility... (duh?)

      Oh, and no monkeys, just giant hairy people. Got monkey suit??

      Peace.

      Delete
    31. Pwned yet again. Wont even acknowledge the lack of monkey.

      Delete
    32. There is nothing 100 percent except death. To say 100 percent of witnesses from all walks of life and the general public is ludicrous . A small cult maybe but that's not even 100 petcent with defectors! Very weak argument and statistically impossible .

      Delete
    33. For me to be 'pwned' (whatever that means), would require you to challenge my claims. You sir offer nothing except name calling, nonsense and mere opinion. I think you should troll somewhere else; your self esteem must take a hammering.

      Peace.

      Delete
    34. You are pwned by definition until you can produce a monkey. Carry on. Please.

      Delete
    35. I can provide a monkey you half-wit, HA HA HA HA!! PGF... AND, 'Leaping Russian Yeti'... can you even read properly???

      Peace.

      Delete
    36. Oh... and no monkey, just giant hairy people. Got monkey suit??

      Peace.

      Delete
    37. Probability of 100 percent of People mis identification and lying of Bigfoot or any subject = zero. Your still an idiot!

      Delete
    38. It's a response to the village idiot who claims 100 percent of all witnesses of bigfoot are lying or mis identification. Even hunters, forest service, law enforcement, wildlife experts, and biologists .

      Delete
    39. Sorry bro. Yeah, can't agree more. These guys are just dumb.

      Peace.

      Delete
    40. Joe, posting that guys resume was inane. One could post the vitas of ivy league anthropologists who equate bigfoot with the tooth fairy....
      Appeals to authority is not a good tactic for an advocate. Jeff Meldrum confirms this because he feels more of his peers should give the topic a look; i.e they aint buying it....
      ...and some of these anthropologists HAVE looked at the evidence, especially in the late 70's. People did engage Krantz and consider his theories....

      Delete
    41. Here is a nice article about the academic debate in the 70's through 80's. It was published in a peer reviewed history of science journal..I found it in the bibliography to the Krantz entry on wiki...Unfortunately, the link is broke so some digging is required....

      Delete
    42. ^Regal, Brian (January 2009). "Entering Dubious Realms: Grover Krantz, Science, and Sasquatch". Annals of Science 66 (1): 83–102.

      I forgot to give the article...duh..

      Delete
    43. Friends, I believe it is time to retire all of these arguments on the Patterson/Gimlin Film. The reality is the film was taken on a 16mm consumer grade camera. A 16mm frame is less than a half inch square. When viewed full frame that means the actual exposed emulsion that captured the figure is quite literally, the size of the head of a pin. There is no way, from the limited quality of the source material, that any one could possibly prove that Patty is either real or a hoax. It is what it is folks, a bipedal figure walking through the woods. Is it a bigfoot? Is it a man in a suit? Your guess is as good as mine.

      Delete
    44. Posting 'that guys' resume was completely relevant to the subject matter, which was Patty? I think looking at that kind of resume sums up the social contradiction in how his opinion can be sort out in the court of law but not when it comes to dogmatized subjects such as this... that was my point. Good tactics? That's for sport and board games... I'm trying to prove a point sir. Though I celebrate him, I don't really care what Medlrum thinks; he's still looking for a gorilla.

      Peace.

      Delete
    45. ^exactly and as no monkey has been produced since its safe to say its a bloke in a suit

      Delete
    46. Anon 7:05...
      Thank you for the link buddy, I'll check it out.

      Anon 7:13...
      Doesn't that put the height into question as opposed to the rest of it?

      Peace

      Delete
    47. Joe you miss the point every single time.

      Delete
    48. 7:13 So it follows that when the film is blown up all that is happening is that grain is being smeared into the frames and can't be differentiated from what is actual details?

      I always look at the face when ever someone offers a "cleaned up" version. It never gets anymore detail...

      Delete
    49. Joe is cool!

      I'm not totally convinced to PGF is real, but patty was pretty similar to what I saw.

      I like how "a simple monkey suit" turns into this incredibly complicated thing as soon as you point out the finer details of the film.

      Delete
    50. Yup the footage is worthless and the only rational thing to do (considering the lack of monkey) is dismiss the film as a bloke in a suit (which it is of course).

      Delete
    51. There's nothing but excellent detail in the PGF after it was cleaned up, before then it used to be a black dot on the screen now we see all of Patty's splendor that is just impossible in 60s suits. Even today it is, which the trolls here know Joe they're well aware it's no suit but placed here to fight it with their monkey talk. They know exactly why there's no capture that's the whole reason they're here, the fact that it can't be caught but still encountered because the squatch species is not of this Earth that's a secret they must protect by attacking those of us that have figured it out.

      Delete
    52. ^^^ yeah, that sure helps the credibility

      Delete
    53. I never read a word Joe but I like your obsession.

      Delete
    54. How to Instruct a Litany of SkeptardsThursday, July 11, 2013 at 11:47:00 AM PDT

      2:38, you are playing word games instead of dealing with the evidence. Duplicate Patty with your claimed monkey suit, or you have nothing. 46 years is long enough for you to accomplish this. FAIL. You have nothing. How do you like it?

      3:45, let me sit you down and explain this again to you, then you can go back out and play: it should be easier for you to reproduce Patty/"the suit" than for one of us to say "hang on a sec while a grab you a bigfoot." Produce the suit, reproduce Patty, or you have nothing. In other words, you have nothing. Go out and play now.

      4:31, the only lunatics in suits around here are the skeptards. Next!!!

      4:43, I can only say that there is something wrong with you. No one is this stubbornly stupid without some damaged mental capacity to explain it. Take heart, human head transplants, complete with brains, are coming your way.

      7:13, you aren't a skeptard, but the muscle mass movement in right thigh during stumble is plain, clear, and obvious. There is no suit material covering the thigh. The spinal erectors are also plain as day. You seem to not be familiar with clear, stabilized copies of the film.

      7:17: Wrong. Dupicate Patty or you have no point. As you cannot duplicate Patty, congratulations, you have no point.

      That is a litany of skeptards instructed. Of course they will all fail the exam, but we try to help.

      Delete
    55. Produce the Patty suit, or go home.

      I see you are going home, good.

      Delete
    56. You had me at "There's Nothing"

      Delete
  6. My friend Peter likes Masterbating

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe Peter could borrow one of Todd Standings puppets?

      Delete
  7. So I wonder how many nights of no bigfoot it will take before this "Expedition" devolves into a torrid night of wildeyed bungholery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YouTube - 'Leaping Russian Yeti', the MK Davis version... watch and explain please.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. Some lunatic in a suit. Next.

      Delete
    3. Explain the gate, the arm length and girth, the way it switches between bipedal and quadrupedal motion (in that terrain), the speed in which it negotiates the terrain to get at it's last visible point of the video, the muscle tone in the arss and back... Explain those with a little more than just 'lunacy'...

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. No idea what that is Joe. It looks more like a leaping silverback gorilla than a yeti. Perhaps this Harvey Pratt you eluded to in an earlier post could shed some light on the subject. Oh and you are in good form today. Virtually a one man army.

      Delete
    5. Joe I'm very sorry but I cannot help myself to resist asking the question. Where is the muscle tone in Patties butt? To me it just looks like a big shapeless diaper. Yes the face looks good and hard to argue that it doesn't.

      Delete
    6. ^ you are the one man army anon 4:37! Why are you such a hypocrite ? You criticize others for not giving answers ( they do and with intelligent responses and experts) yet you have none or quote some avg Joe relying on hearsay . Or u just plain don't answer anything . You call Joe a one man army but you never have anyone agree with you ever. Joe has a lot of supporters. You make no freaking sense.

      Delete
    7. Anon 4:45 you ignorant slut. The comment about the one man army is ment as a compliment to Joe. He can single handedly fend off anyone with facts and figures. This is admirable and good reading. As for you, bend over I want to probe your brain. Yes this means I think you have shit for brains and probably diarrea of the mouth as well.

      Delete
    8. A misunderstanding guys, I get defensive all the time. Now let's concentrate on getting the skeptics eh?

      Oh, and you guys are the best.

      Peace.

      Delete
    9. Anon 4:43... Did you see the MK version with screen shots? It looks like sheer mass and tone to me??

      Peace.

      Delete
    10. Anon 4:55 are u a nut case? If you realized I made a mistake and I'm on Joe's side as well Then what was all that crap u wrote? A simple correction would suffice. I'm thinking you're the village idiot just pretending to be someone else with that stupid response because u used the same language as he does! F*ck off!

      Delete
    11. Anon 4:55, because you needed to be properly shamed for your insubordination. Now that your public hissy fit has been documented I'm kind of thinking you look like the immature village idiot.

      Delete
    12. Above comment intended for anon 5:30 sorry 4:55.

      Delete
    13. Anybody thinking or pretending that Patty's butt is a diaper that doesn't move, I've got news for you just check out MK Davis' videos on it he's shown in frames that her butt cheeks very much move. Everybody needs to see it once you've seen that clip you'll feel dumb ever imagining anything else. And that's just one tiny detail proved real on her body along with everything else, PGF remains a neverending treasure trove of new discoveries precisely why it's hated by the trolls.

      Delete
    14. Not only is it a diaper butt, it is a dirty diaper butt. I mean it looks like patty is really packen a load. And it really looks more fake to me with the slowed down frame by frame stabilized version. I always thought it was pretty realistic until I saw this version. The line where the upper body and lower body meet watch when "she" turns to look at the camera. It looks like a turret on a battleship.

      Delete
    15. It's strange that the claimed to be science types are so unobservant. Science is totally based on observation. But the science types can't see what the hell is in front of them. You can't claim to be a science type while at the same time constantly and consistently being unobservant.

      Delete
  8. Oh-man, I couldn’t resist this one… Todd is outstanding in his field... Waite for it… Waite for it… Todd is outSTANDING in everybody’s field.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Standing and Les are planning expeditions in 3 hot zones.

    And you will like it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. DWA from the BFF is a dick.

    ReplyDelete
  11. i taught standing everthing he knows and he still cant get closer than 60yards because the foots kno his intent and dont lile it. this show will be like all the others un less they pray amd change thier inner heart haha they cant. only goldilocks knows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big hairy ass titty bleeber^^^^^^^and probably because his whore mother had hairy nipples. Brush your teeth you limey pasty degenerate.

      Delete
    2. HA HA HA HA!! Stupid little pussy. Tough guy hiding behind anonymity, real tough guy. You must have the self esteem of a rat.

      Delete
  12. Todd Standing owns a sizable video production company. His alias name is actually Todd Rockwell. His prior company was OutstandingProductions where he went by the name Todd Rockwell. His sister is a professional makeup artist Louise Standing and part owner in the company. They had/have many dozens of big clients in Calgary and nearby. They also had complete capability to create their video of the alleged bigfoot that Todd has been promoting.

    They appear to be going through a redesign of their company. This appears to be the new company under the name Videoguides.

    http://videoguides.tv

    It is very unfortunate that Les Stroud fell for Todd's claims. I suspect that there is some aspect of the video company that has 'encouraged' the project to go forward. Although I do wonder if they are even aware that Todd's alias name is Rockwell? I wonder if they researched Todd's old claims at UnexplainedMysteries? I wonder if they know that Todd used phony handles in various forums to praise himself while saying he was another person? The admins were able to isolate his IP Addresses and he was busted. There's so much more but Todd's got a silver tongue. Sylvanic the location will forever be hidden from truth because it didn't ever exist as Standing claimed in his early boastings. He just lives off his old creative claims.

    As time went on, Standing branched out trying to appear as the wilderness expert and leapfrogging off his old claims while never proving much. Anybody can get lost. Having a video production company at his disposal enabled much to seem real because they are expert videographers.

    Recognize the voice?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lp-rIfJ-Qq4&list=UUIQVNUiX_3GA7tfLekT22vQ

    Here's what they know about you:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KmPXZtoCnM&list=UUIQVNUiX_3GA7tfLekT22vQ&index=4

    There are other videos here as well.

    Nobody can say that Todd's company doesn't have the capability to generate a phony bigfoot or to use video to further his goals. Its too bad those without common sense or investigative nature get sucked in. I've been following this character's claims for many years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Todd 'takes it in the Taterhole' Standing.

      Delete
    2. ^Todd's name is Todd Rockwell Standing, Louise Standing is his wife. He is prepared to take legal action against those that slander his name and his work.

      Delete
    3. Todd's company does not have the capability to generate a phony Bigfoot.

      Delete
    4. Dave, call him, talk to him and ask him some of your questions, don't be rude and you will get answers to your questions.

      Delete
    5. Rush, I'm sure Standing will tell Dave what he wants to hear. Dyer and ToeJam will do likewise.

      The 'Ewok' pictures are simply laughable. Empty threats of legal action cannot hide this fact.

      Standing has been judged on his output and therefore that is why he is considered a joke within the BF community.

      His presence will taint this show the same way he ruined the credibility of the America's Secrets show.

      MMG


      Delete
    6. Rush, I followed his claims since almost the very beginning. Maybe Les AND Rogan should start from the beginning and have Standing show them the "2' X 4' hole through a mountain chain" that Standing claimed led the way to Sylvanic at UnexplainedMysteries forum when he first started. For something to reach all the way through a mountain to a hidden valley, would have to be over a mile long. Especially where he claimed there was a river present in said valley. So why not just follow the river? Of course he also said it took them 3 days to reach the entrance on snowmobile so I guess it would be inconvenient to go back right? Good reason to not validate a claim.

      When they don't see that such a cave is possible or true, then all they have to do is follow all the other claims of Standing's that lead to nowhere. Did you do that Les?

      Of course there could just be that smell for more good money-making publicity as the prime motivator to do the show right? If that's the case, well it simply becomes entertainment.

      Delete
    7. Damn rushfer,why are you so sensitive about Todd takes it in the taterhole Standing?Certainty you can't believe the ewok pics.Not trying to troll but he is almost in the same ranks as Dickie Ryder.I said almost. No one is in the same realm as Dick.Have you ever had an encounter with a Bigfoot?I have and they most certainly don't look like his ewoks.I guess his Bigfoots go to the salon every week.They are pretty well groomed.Just think about it.

      Like I said,not trying to troll.

      Delete
    8. Rush, this is just a single reference re Louise Standing.

      http://www.bigfootlunchclub.com/2011/03/sylvanic-dotcom-circa-may-2005.html

      It seems when Todd is doing bigfoot, he's Standing. When he's video production its Rockwell. Why?

      Delete
  13. Schizos!!! There's no fucken bigfoot, seek medical help please!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, well how do you explain the 8 foot hairy guy that tiptoes into my kitchen at night and steals my pancake batter?..troll...

      Delete
  14. It appears by the postings today, that the JREF cut and pasters, have cleaned off the benches in order to mount a major diatribe assault on Bigfootevidence. They must have judged this news as Cornerstone Evidence, therefore it is worthy of a Code Red. Not only are the Karl Rose and Kitakaze wannabes here today, but the executives that write their paychecks have shown up in order to demonstrate how to play the internet game of PLANTING SEEDS OF DOUBT and POISONING THE WATER. In case nobody has figured it out, they have a computer database of twisted accountings of historical facts, as well as snappy comebacks to common footer arguements. There is no winning this game because there is nobody that is actually seriously considering the other sides arguments as actually having any validity. I leave you with the teachings of Stanton Friedman:

    Stanton Friedman’s 4 rules of Fraudulent Debunkers are:
    1. “What the public doesn’t know, I won’t tell them.”
    2. “Do not bother me with the facts, because my mind is made up.”
    3. “If you can’t attack the data, then attack the messenger, it’s easier”.
    4. “Do your research by proclamation, because investigation is too much trouble”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool story bro. Still no monkey.

      Delete
    2. Anon 9:24...

      No monkeys, just giant hairy people who could twist your head off like a soda bottle.
      Peace.

      Delete
  15. Since Matt Moneymaker cruelly called Todd Standing a hoaxer on United States TV's Animal Planets, Finding Bigfoot, I am looking for to Les Straud righting that wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt's just as big a fraud himself they're two peas in a pod, both actually helping to NOT find Bigfoot but keep it hidden safely on their respected Governments' behalf.

      Delete
  16. Todd Standing is a piece of shit and a waste of human skin. I hope he gets killed by a bear or falls off a cliff and smashes in his goddamn skull.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's the way to think of your fellow man, good for you. Do you kick kittens also?

      Delete
  17. Todd STANDING should have been named Todd LYING.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Why would anyone want a serial bigfoot hoaxer as a guide?

    ReplyDelete
  19. outrageous !
    Todd Standing is a fake and he'll only get lost in the woods only to have Les rescue him .
    Maybe he'll lead Les to one of his radio controlled claymation puppets he claims to be the real thing

    ReplyDelete
  20. was Kim Kardashian not available ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was but she couldn't guarantee a bigfoot like Todd could.

      Delete
    2. it was for the best- Kayne would have hogged the spotlight from Les forcing Les to impale him with a sharpened porcupine quill

      Delete
  21. Too bad - Les doesn't know what he's getting into here

    ReplyDelete
  22. The only hard sell Standing has ever had was cooking up multiple sock puppet email accounts to brag on his own work!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Something tells me that Les and Todd will be laying in a cave naked and both will have the same queer look at the camera.

    ReplyDelete
  24. With an all Canadian cast, what happens in Canada, stays in Canada. They ought to try and squeeze in a weekend at Sasquatch Ontario's research site. Now that would put the fear of God into old Les.

    ReplyDelete
  25. WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY. He's FULL OF IT!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Them both being Canadian is why the loyalty.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I knew Les was a fraud looking for another TV show and another pay check

    This will probably be similar to Mountain Monsters with the fake noises, CGI, and phony thermal images.



    ReplyDelete
  28. No such thing as a nocturnal homid. Can't find one in the fossil record and you won't find one in the wild today. Hominids evolved seeking shelter at night to avoid predation.You will never find what is not there. Period!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its funny how you think your perception of reality is so absolute that you can categorically deny the existence of something. You observe very little of the universe yet you foolishly attach yourself in your fragmented mind to your concept. Just because you do not see something does not mean it is not there. You smell of fear of what you may not understand

      Delete
  29. And the eyes are too small on Todd's video for a nocturnal animal. Steperines are the best example of a nocturnal animal. Nice try Todd but your hoax is scientifically inaccurate.

    ReplyDelete