Over the years, many giant skeletons have been discovered and excavated, but where are they now? Is there a conspiracy to cover up giant bones? Watch this thought provoking video about the subject:
why has the comments section been taken over for ,the last 6 onths or so,by geeky kids. all this dumb talk about firsting,hating travis,poop in a jar.
it sll s playground humor and cringworthy. im nit stupid and realise this will get the usual suspects wrting their witless un original comments
just a thought but why ,if u want be funny, ctualy give it some thought and post an off topic reply that people find amusing.all we read is pointless,purile child like one liners that make u cringe im a skeptic,in your terminology,but so want BF to be true.ststa don't support a breeding population of animals this size to go uncaptured since America was discovered. there only slip up being the p/g film. yes ,a good film,but hoaxed in my opinion.which unless im wrong is the point of the comments.id love to hear others opinions on why they believe p/g or any film is true,reasons for belief,wlak,shin rise etc etc...not for the 805 on here.they just write off topic kids stuff
zzzzzzzzzzzz
could the 20% put in more effort and maybe the majority will get to the programme and we can devate the films in a witty,factual basis. I remember reading commens from brilliant reasoning whih made me think.i believe these people r long gone.all it is is the dumb kids.im guessing shawn doesn't care as longas their is people usig the site he doesn't care clearly about the quality of the posts
PIAJG(poop in a jar guy) Knucklegrunt all the various anti_Tavis diatribes et al are what make this site enjoyable-otherwise it would just be more ya-ya bla-bla about a non-existent fantasy hominid
6. Packham is a children's presenter employed to help scared children sleep at night, and who's programme on the PGF was cut substantially as his 'claims' were just that and the suit he created looked nothing like PG; not even close.
7. Do you even know what your on about?
8. I don't think so...
9. Just another scared of the woods skeptic.
10. Don't be scared just stay indoors looking at porn & American Gladiators and stay away from blogs like this.
Pwned Packham flunked even worse than Bob Hilarious. He didn't own anybody, and even had to creatively edit his phone call to Gimlin in an attempt to slant what Gimlin said.
3:00 needs to be served a gigantic steaming bowl of Shut Up.
Joe, you think just because you believe something it has to be true. This fault is greatly compounded by the fact that you uncritically accept every claim or story about these things....
In fact, an abundance of trace evidence and plethora of encounters without any physical proof is evidence that this is all just a modern, popular myth. A myth with active participants adding chapters to the story....
Bigfoots are rare, isolated and most of the evidence is crap or it does not exist. The only possibilities a serious person would consider...
Now, if the former is the case the problem becomes what distinguishes the crap from the "good" stuff? Answer: probably nothing. If that is so, lights out....
"..FACT that these skeletons are being..."...Thanks for making point..lol..
Who is bashing you? You are the one that has been baiting people(before signing off with "Peace"). You and MMG are clearly pissed, but your anger should be directed at the bigfoots that refuse to be captured, die or photographed..lol...
Joe, you are pretty much 100 percent correct. I live in N. Utah, am an equipment operator, and have signed a total of of 5 non-disclosure agreements concerning the large hairy dude. LOL Can't say much more than that, until I retire in '18. Believe me or don't, I dont care. But mining and oil companies FOR SURE take this stuff seriously. Hang in there. B
I relaxed as advided at the beginning. I listened to the 2 guys 4 2 ins and fell asleep.i roused when hey fifnished to relsie they have ZERO evidence. a few news paper clippings and dodgy hoaxed pics aren't going to cut it.
where is this skeleton they are talking about at the start.is it just me or coudnt they just ask to see the skeleton. ask the guy why he didn't take pictures of a giant skelenton,even on his cell pone. I know if I came across a skeleton that's 8half feet id take pics all over he pace,this is just a story that is cleary hoaxed. no pics/evidence or skeleton. don't even tell us where it is
Skeptards always use reductionism in arguinig. When Sykes was DNA testing English people and discovering almost all were Celtic on the maternal side, at the time he'd done 50,000 tests of English people--he'd tested 50,000 DNA samples from 50,000 different English people. Some considered themselves purely English and Anglo-Saxon through and through. Most were amazed to find they were also Celtic.
Someone who disagreed with me said the same damned thing as this guy above: "A few DNA tests don't prove anything."
Oh yes, of course, 50,000 = "a few".
This is a consistent, habitual, chronic technique of your humdrum run-of-the-mill skeptard.
Ha ha ha ha!!! Silly little people resorting to silly nonsense... small minds think of small tactics when their's nothing else to do. Guess I'm getting to the small minded people eh?
So the problem with this video is that it is a well known fact that a lot of the newspaper stories were tall tales used to drum up circulations. this included fake skeletons being made to charge people to come look. Kind of like a predecessor to Dyer
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Firsting forever!
ReplyDeleteJW
I bury my gigantic bone in mounds too.. Sounds legit.
DeleteIT'S OBVIOUS, BIGFOOT IS AN ALIEN ENTITY! OUR GOVT. TREAT IT THE EXACT SAME WAY THEY TREAT UFOS...WHY?????????
DeleteALL CAPS
Travis loves men.
DeleteMMC
WAR ON TRAVIS!!
DeleteSecond,
ReplyDeleteoh yeah- RUSH SUCKS INFINITELY!
ReplyDeleteRush sucks?!!!! Really?!!!
Deletewhy has the comments section been taken over for ,the last 6 onths or so,by geeky kids. all this dumb talk about firsting,hating travis,poop in a jar.
Deleteit sll s playground humor and cringworthy. im nit stupid and realise this will get the usual suspects wrting their witless un original comments
just a thought but why ,if u want be funny, ctualy give it some thought and post an off topic reply that people find amusing.all we read is pointless,purile child like one liners that make u cringe
im a skeptic,in your terminology,but so want BF to be true.ststa don't support a breeding population of animals this size to go uncaptured since America was discovered. there only slip up being the p/g film. yes ,a good film,but hoaxed in my opinion.which unless im wrong is the point of the comments.id love to hear others opinions on why they believe p/g or any film is true,reasons for belief,wlak,shin rise etc etc...not for the 805 on here.they just write off topic kids stuff
zzzzzzzzzzzz
could the 20% put in more effort and maybe the majority will get to the programme and we can devate the films in a witty,factual basis. I remember reading commens from brilliant reasoning whih made me think.i believe these people r long gone.all it is is the dumb kids.im guessing shawn doesn't care as longas their is people usig the site he doesn't care clearly about the quality of the posts
Too much reading (and you take yourself too seriously)
DeleteToo much spelling mistakes.
DeletePoop in a jar guy has been around for years.Where the hell have you been?
DeleteYeah he is the poop pillar of this community!
Delete1:26, RUSH PWNS YOUR EXISTENCE!!!
DeletePIAJG(poop in a jar guy) Knucklegrunt all the various anti_Tavis diatribes et al are what make this site enjoyable-otherwise it would just be more ya-ya bla-bla about a non-existent fantasy hominid
DeletePoop in a jar guy is President For Life. His benevolent rule is fated to last until Bigfoot is discovered.....
DeleteI'm nit stupid.....hee....hee....
DeleteShawn is Joe's reward for caning skeptards over the last few days?
ReplyDeleteNice one.
We're taking this blog back.
MMG
1. There is no bigfoot.
Delete2. You are pwned.
3. Pgf is patterson trolling bleevers.
4. Got monkey?
5. No really, got monkey?
6. Packham pwns footers.
1. There are giasnt hairy people.
Delete2. What does 'pwned' mean?
3. PGF hasn't been proven to be fake.
4. No monkeys just giant hairy people.
5. No really... just giant hairy people.
6. Packham is a children's presenter employed to help scared children sleep at night, and who's programme on the PGF was cut substantially as his 'claims' were just that and the suit he created looked nothing like PG; not even close.
7. Do you even know what your on about?
8. I don't think so...
9. Just another scared of the woods skeptic.
10. Don't be scared just stay indoors looking at porn & American Gladiators and stay away from blogs like this.
Peace.
Joe.
Pwned Packham flunked even worse than Bob Hilarious. He didn't own anybody, and even had to creatively edit his phone call to Gimlin in an attempt to slant what Gimlin said.
Delete3:00 needs to be served a gigantic steaming bowl of Shut Up.
Woooooo Hooooooooooo!!!!!!! Shawn, you are the best!!!! MMG, isn't this fun?!
ReplyDeletePeace.
Joe.
Still got no monkey huh?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteFor too long the skeptard has held sway here Joe.
DeleteWe've had more debate over the last few days than we've had for an age.
The pwned and got monkey bs is being replaced by something more substantial.
It's for the good of footers and skeptards alike.
Bring it on!
MMG
Ohh joe, you have some intelligent posts but your grammar makes you look like an IGNORAMUS!!
DeleteReally? Keep poking at my grammar you fool, I don't see any quality counter points from you! Ha ha ha ha!!
DeletePeace.
Joe.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete^You mad bro?
DeleteJoe Fitzgerald but does Gerald fit Joe?
DeleteThat's actually quite funny...
DeletePeace.
Joe.
There are no giant skeletons its all BS like religion, UFOs, mermaids and bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteTrue dat, true dat
DeleteAnon 3:19 & 3:20 - Pull your fucking heads out of your goddamn asses - religion and mermaids are real!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYou'll notice that 3:19 and 3:20 are the same individual. It's a skeptard backing itself up with an imaginary skeptard friend.
DeleteThis skeptard guy is getting a severe pounding here.
DeleteTaking this blog back.
MMG
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou still have nothing. Just keep patting yourself on the back, oaf.
DeleteLookout! Boogerman gonna getcha!
Just cause you keep saying it, like some rehearsed therapy coping technique, doesn't make it true I'm afraid. Ha ha ha ha ha!!
DeletePeace.
Joe.
Joe, you think just because you believe something it has to be true. This fault is greatly compounded by the fact that you uncritically accept every claim or story about these things....
DeleteIn fact, an abundance of trace evidence and plethora of encounters without any physical proof is evidence that this is all just a modern, popular myth. A myth with active participants adding chapters to the story....
Bigfoots are rare, isolated and most of the evidence is crap or it does not exist. The only possibilities a serious person would consider...
Now, if the former is the case the problem becomes what distinguishes the crap from the "good" stuff? Answer: probably nothing. If that is so, lights out....
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete"..FACT that these skeletons are being..."...Thanks for making point..lol..
DeleteWho is bashing you? You are the one that has been baiting people(before signing off with "Peace"). You and MMG are clearly pissed, but your anger should be directed at the bigfoots that refuse to be captured, die or photographed..lol...
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOk, Joe. Take care, man....
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteLook I mean no offence, I appreciate the debate... and I hope to speak to you soon, whoever you are.
DeleteKeep safe.
Joe.
Joe, you are pretty much 100 percent correct. I live in N. Utah, am an equipment operator, and have signed a total of of 5 non-disclosure agreements concerning the large hairy dude. LOL
DeleteCan't say much more than that, until I retire in '18.
Believe me or don't, I dont care. But mining and oil companies FOR SURE take this stuff seriously.
Hang in there.
B
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI relaxed as advided at the beginning. I listened to the 2 guys 4 2 ins and fell asleep.i roused when hey fifnished to relsie they have ZERO evidence. a few news paper clippings and dodgy hoaxed pics aren't going to cut it.
ReplyDeletewhere is this skeleton they are talking about at the start.is it just me or coudnt they just ask to see the skeleton. ask the guy why he didn't take pictures of a giant skelenton,even on his cell pone. I know if I came across a skeleton that's 8half feet id take pics all over he pace,this is just a story that is cleary hoaxed. no pics/evidence or skeleton. don't even tell us where it is
bollox
Skeptards always use reductionism in arguinig. When Sykes was DNA testing English people and discovering almost all were Celtic on the maternal side, at the time he'd done 50,000 tests of English people--he'd tested 50,000 DNA samples from 50,000 different English people. Some considered themselves purely English and Anglo-Saxon through and through. Most were amazed to find they were also Celtic.
DeleteSomeone who disagreed with me said the same damned thing as this guy above: "A few DNA tests don't prove anything."
Oh yes, of course, 50,000 = "a few".
This is a consistent, habitual, chronic technique of your humdrum run-of-the-mill skeptard.
Skeptards are blindingly brilliant, aren't they?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete... And by using the term 'bollox' I'm assuming you are British, so if that's the case; hello! As am I!
ReplyDeletePeace.
Joe.
I believe that it is a real.
ReplyDeleteAs do too many people that are unfortunately drowned out by skeptics, who in comparison have an agenda to censor the truth!
DeletePeace.
Joe.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteAre you the same "Joe" with the boyfriend name Stan? If i offend you, i apologize! Just wondering...
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!! Silly little people resorting to silly nonsense... small minds think of small tactics when their's nothing else to do. Guess I'm getting to the small minded people eh?
ReplyDeletePeace.
Joe.
YEAH,YOU BOYS NEED TOO GET OFF THIS SITE TILL YOU GROW HAIR ON YOUR BALLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteFinally! a video worth watching about are neighbors in the woods with some plausable truth behind it. It definitely would make a good tv documentary.
ReplyDeletelOOSE THE ARGUMENT, CALL PEOPLE GAY. ^^^ YOUR JUST A SYUPID PIECE OF SHIT!
ReplyDeleteSo the problem with this video is that it is a well known fact that a lot of the newspaper stories were tall tales used to drum up circulations. this included fake skeletons being made to charge people to come look. Kind of like a predecessor to Dyer
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete... And how dare you use that man's name in the same sentence as historical fact.
ReplyDeletePeace.
Joe.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete