Listen: This Is What A Multiple Class A Bigfoot Sighting Sounds Like


Last weekend, Bigfoot researchers in Genoskwa Ohio had an encounter of a lifetime during an expedition that resulted in multiple "Class A" sightings. A "Class A" is when people are actually sure they've seen a Bigfoot. Listen the excitement in the team members' voices as the Bigfoot reveals itself near base camp.

Thanks to Paul Hayes for sharing. Paul and his team also made casts of two prints -- one was 13 inches and the other was 9 inches.


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. A group of bigfoot enthusiasts seeing what they want to see.

      More bigfoot "evidence" with zero proof.

      Delete
    2. Typo Shawn. It's Penoskwa. Way to make us look stupid.

      Delete
    3. WAKE UP YOU IGNORANT DOLTS!!

      Delete
    4. ^^ welcome back after your long hainus

      Delete
    5. This is Henry May.. Could you guys please lay off my boyfriend, Travis?! At first we thought it was cute because you guys (the public) found out about us. Now, it's starting to take a toll on OUR relationship! So, i'm kindly asking everyone to please, LEAVE US ALONE!!!!

      Delete
  2. Once again,the losers run amok! Sad ass motherf##kers!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't even live in your parents basement do you? I bet you live in the boot of their car.

      Delete
    2. Damn, really surprised at the amount of Brits on here. Shawn, please post a data slice showing a percentage breakdown of where your audience is coming from. Would be interesting to know.

      Delete
    3. Yes please do and circumvent all these Virtual Private Networks. ;)

      Delete
  4. this comment section is a joke, this site has promise, fucking clean this section up so people can really discuss the articles

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only if you put all those tissues way.

      Delete
    2. You're two years too late, bro. Not as many Spambots as of late but still a bunch of douche nozzles.

      Delete
    3. tru dat from an old timer passing by.

      Delete
    4. A year or so ago, this site actually had some seriousness to it. Now, it's become nothing but a farce.

      Delete
    5. Seems like we have a Multiple Class A A-hole sighting tonight. What on earth is there left to discuss that you people haven't already said a million times?

      Delete
    6. Kentucky Fried Chicken Recipe. Just saying.....

      Delete
    7. Everything has been said, but nothing has yet to be seen.

      Delete
    8. Oh no. There's much more to be said, and more money to be made from bigfoot.

      Delete
    9. Shawn needs to post more hard-bodied young ladies with pear-shaped bottoms rocking the hula hoop!

      Delete
    10. Or Henry May actualy in the field.

      Delete
    11. Instead of on the recliner?

      Delete
    12. Half the empty headed pricks spoiling this site cant even spell serious, let alone contribute a serious opinion. This site as the potential to be a great place if it wasnt for the fucking idiots that make up 95% of the comments. The saddest part is that Shawn doesnt give a shit whats posted on here, its all good traffic for him.

      Delete
    13. Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one, and they're all AWESOME!

      Delete
    14. "Funny" breaks up the "No Bigfoot" of our everyday lives. Thanks Shawn, for letting us vent and amuse.

      Delete
    15. Shawn is with "zenyeti". Very few take them seriously. They are just a flash in the pan...like SnowWalkerPrime. Remember him?

      Delete
    16. If you want debate join the BFF.

      Bigfeet shouldn't be taken too seriously. You''ll find that on the BFF also as you peruse the habituation and psychic sasquatch threads.

      You won't believe what you are reading.

      MMG

      Delete
    17. You can't even spell has and yet you lecture others

      Delete
  5. Ahhhh....the sweet sounds of getting nothing and liking it. Since they won't let us film them, let's just start recording our reactions while seeing them with audio only...that'll fool those Hairy Bastards. Top Notch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In my Country filming hairy bastards is illegal. Is there a market in your Country for this as I know lots of, well things I bet you would really like. ;)

      Delete
    2. What country are you from? That's many people in Italy, isn't it?

      Delete
    3. Hey doofus. Hawaii isn't a country.

      Delete
    4. Who said it was dipshit?

      Delete
    5. Read the posts in this section in succession. Dummkopf.

      Delete
  6. Let me get this straight. Bob Gimlin had two horses that day and Patterson had one? Did Gimlin's second horse, the pack horse rear too when the horses spotted Patty?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was never good at these maths qeustions. My guess is Jenny has 2 green balls left.

      Delete
    2. It's best to not try and get any of this shit straight.

      Delete
    3. So Jenny had no balls left? Damn, I told you I was no good at these questions or qeustions.

      Delete
    4. If a Sasquatch boards a train in the Pacific NW at 8pm PST and a Skunk Ape boards a train at 5pm EST......

      Delete
    5. I think that Gimlin didn't have the second horse with him that day. I don't know where it was. You can see the pack horse in the clips that include the entire Patterson film, which has the section before Patty was caught on film.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBTUQI60yqQ

      Delete
    6. Nah sorry, fuck Gimlin or his retarded brother Nilmig...We are talking about more important things at present.

      Was he wearing a dress?

      Delete
    7. He did have a hat and a rifle.

      Delete
    8. He was wearing his riding gear.

      Is Gimlin lying when he tells his story at bigfoot conferences (getting standing ovations and getting paid)?

      Delete
    9. ahhh god. Okay Gimlin was telling the truth - NOTTTTTTTTT........... Bwwaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

      Delete
    10. Of course he is. Funny shit. Probably sometimes with the blessing of the more cynical organizers. Hey, he is telling the audience what they want to hear and everyone is happy...

      Delete
    11. Just as the rivers of cash pour into the pockets of Chris Packham and Bob Hilarious the crazy apey monkey maker faker who failed to fake Patty.

      Gimlin has something those two jokers don't: Credibility.

      Delete
    12. Chris Packham no credibility????? The guy is a professional biologist and naturalist who works for the BBC he doesn't make money off Bigfoot either he made one show over ten years ago!!!

      Delete
    13. Packham was a Childrens tv presenter.

      He thought he could casually solve the PGF mystery by simply recreating the suit using the best suit maker in the business and a substantial budget.

      The suit has to be seen to be believed. It was so unlike the creature in the video most people consider it excellent evidence that the suit cannot be recreated even so many years after Patterson's encounter was filmed.

      The suit section was cut from the UK version of the documentary by the BBC. Packham then had to heavily edit an interview with Bob Gimlin to save his show from being canned altogether.

      MMG

      Delete
    14. Gimlin was riding two guys in a horse costume, thats what happened. I know since I was the back half of the horse.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. As long as you don't like to shove'em up your ass. Your okay in my book.

      Delete
    2. What about dousing them with gasoline, setting them alight and rolling them down a hill onto the freeway?

      Delete
    3. That would pass as humor as long as you video it and upload to Youtube.

      Delete
    4. Actually, that's not a bad idea to prove bigfoot's existence. Set up a booby trap that causes a squatch to go up in flames. Something involving gasoline and an ignition source.

      Delete
    5. I like turtles

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y

      Delete
    6. But the body would probably burn to ash with no video, therefore back to square one.

      Delete
    7. Nah, you'd have enough charred remains to prove that bigfoot exists. Also, a squatch in flames might run out of the woods and be seen by people who will wait until it goes down.

      Delete
  8. There's enough people there to chase him down, or whatever else you guys decide to write when you fill in the blanks. What could they have done to him - starts ... now!... \/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (clive squashy)

      Good post.


      About what...I have no idea.

      Delete
  9. some video would have been nice... all the night vision and no video... why ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. They gonna catch that stank ape or what. If thay do put it in a box an a sell it!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Shit, I'm meant to atch the video before posting, Oops. It's still not going to happen ;)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Is anybody drinking at the moment or should I say sober at the moment? As theres a good porn on 125 at present. Boggy Creek.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drinking here - saturated, but immune somehow. Here's to you!!! Cheers!

      Delete
  13. Stupid bitches lol. "i saw me one of them thar bigfoots" The power of suggestion and bullshit is hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Didn't know they made Sasquatch radio theatre, seriously why fucking bother it's no more proof than just saying I saw one in the woods! Where's the bit when one guy says "he's cloaking!!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (patty's cloak)

      NO NO NO ! It's "he's choking!!"

      And then listen real close..."his chicken."

      Delete
  15. This comment section looks like walmart,all the retards are here at one time

    ReplyDelete
  16. Listen, you need to ask yourself about how compelling the voices recorded are. To me, there's doesn't appear to be anything rehurst about anything they are saying and they appear to be very alarmed and convinced in what they are experiencing. Furthermore; audio recording is the fastest and way to document activity and thoughts to relay back afterwards... On many occasions researchers document their feelings and thoughts many hours afterwards and because if the duration of time that has past and the sensational aspect of what they've experienced, it leaves them with too many questions on whether they actually did experience what they experienced and in turn leave them in the same spot as they did, prior to making the sometimes great effort to get out in the wilderness.
    Secondly; to the people who rightly feel that too much nonsense is written on this blog, ignore it, challenge the sceptical points of view when you can, and just get YOUR thoughts down and eventually the pointless crap will cease. The more you contribute to better discussion the more you make it a common occurrence.

    Peace.
    Joe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe, in theory you are right. This site use to be a place to read about evidence, hoaxes, sightings, etc. and then make comments, add to the discussion, give a different point of view... Now this site plays host to foolishness with no credibility. Trust me, they don't go away. Those with any intelligent conversation end up going away because it is hard to make comments or replies when the usual response in "because I said stupid." Or, "Bigfoot and unicorns live under my bed," blah, blah,blah.

      Until a BF is captured these fools will never acknowledge the existence (or even possible exisence of these creatures). Even then will most claim that the captured bigfoot is a fake, hoax...kill the messenger, etc. "A truly blind person is one who believes they have seen everything."-Arthur Goodman

      Archer1

      Delete
  17. ... And to the skeptics; who are opinionated enough to state anonymously that they feel that this recording is fake, you have the same claim to the truth as the people who are open to the idea that these people are indeed experiencing what they claim to be.

    Peace.
    Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  18. ... However, a neutral viewpoint would ask, "if many people are experiencing the same thing at the same time, wouldn't that constitute truth in a court of law?"

    Peace.
    Joe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, you are correct. It more than one person witnesses an event (crime) this is considered enough probable cause to issue a warrant under state law. However, in the case of BF evidence if several people see, hear, take a picture and give a sworn statement to a BF encounter then most "skeptical thinkers" will shout, lie, hoax, idiots....

      I think the term is "double standard."

      Archer1

      Delete
    2. I like you Archer1... stick around...

      Peace.
      Joe.

      Delete
    3. A mob rules mentality?Then you must admit that this site is fine the way it is since you are outnumbered by people who feel differently from youfself

      Delete
    4. Joes an independent anyway so my respect for that

      Delete
    5. Thats darn right...crazy like Dave too

      Delete
    6. I believe him to be a titties man and that is quite agreeable to myself

      Delete
  19. ... Excuse the grammar on my first comment, I'm trying to work and post at the same time!!

    Peace.
    Joe,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just go back to work and yes I need some fries with that burger

      Delete
    2. Is your life so sad that you've got to anonymously pick arguments and look for everyday chat on a Bigfoot blog? Really?! I feel very sorry for you... Pathetic. Have the last word, I've made my point.

      Peace.
      Joe.

      Delete
    3. Not really,now get them fries

      Delete
  20. Dear Joe,

    We here at BF Evidence do not allow truth, facts, eyewitness testimony or evidence to get in the way of showing our true colors. Bigfoot isn't real simply because we say so. We are smarter than you, better educated than you, and more logical than you. We never allow actual facts to get in the way of our "informed opinion."

    Signed,

    Hamburglar, shit in jar man, Mayor McStuffme, Mr/Mrs. Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rush rules though,at least tell me you're a Rush fan,Joe

      Delete
    2. Is someone tickling your breasts Joe?Listen to my podcast

      Delete
    3. Thats darn right,damn good podcast

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?