New Photo: Game Cam Sasquatch Leg


This strange looking image of a partial leg possibly belonging to "Bigfoot" is was posted by Ken Cook on April 5, 2013. It was supposedly shot on a game cam in Grand Rapids, Manitoba back in September 14, 2012. According to Ken, the camera was about 3 feet above the tree. Here's the high-rez photo:



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. that is not what a Bigfoot leg looks like!

      Fake.

      Delete
    2. That IS what your mums ham-bone looks like though.

      Delete
    3. eBay sucks!!
      eBay steals!!
      eBay lies!!

      Delete
    4. Yeah. This is the real deal folks.
      Its a picture of A Tree.

      Delete
    5. A picture of a tree? I clearly see a picture of someone's/something's leg, thigh, knee cap, etc. Man if you are thinking that is a tree you are definately a hardcore skeptic.

      Delete
    6. it's a hairy dego leg! period end of the story. it says October on the pic, come oct. you better have more hair than that covering your body for the winter. fake, hoax or what ever you want to call it.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Pwned like Biscardi in a mockumentary

      Delete
    2. Pwned like Fb/Fb traveling thousands of miles to see a documentary that Pwned footers.

      Delete
    3. I pwnd your moms sweet ass with my footer last night

      Delete
    4. Pwned like your mom guy with my mom's anal warts.

      Delete
    5. Nope and you're still lame

      Delete
    6. ^ bought the platinum membership to see hank. Can't believe the pwnage he endures.

      Delete
    7. PWNING RIGHTS UNDER REVIEW.

      Trollandia; Statute of limitations:

      <Pwning
      Article C
      Section $7,5000

      Delete
    8. When lame guy says lame
      What he means is he is gay
      Makes love to a sock

      Delete
    9. 6:29 you stop flirting with me you silly goose you

      Delete
  3. Why did Bob gimlin say to Chris packham that there is chance roger hoaxed him that day yet you don't hear him say this at his paid bigfoot conferences. Funny that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess there's just a slight chance, since Roger was a known liar, thief, and con man who was out of cash.

      Delete
    2. Sometimes a hoaxing squirrel finds a nut.

      - Dick Ryder

      Delete
    3. BobG was throwing you skeptics a bone. He knows what he saw was real...

      Delete
    4. How compassionate of Bob. Skeptics really need a lot of assistance.

      Delete
    5. ^another pwned footer on the pwned by patterson list.

      Delete
    6. 4:43, you are trying to be a disinformant. You are being selective and not reporting all. Since you asked the question, here is your answer via BIGFOOT'S bLOG:

      And then the host Chris Packham actually calls Gimlin on the phone. The transcription: "When I first saw this thing well it was just like the adrenaline flew, you know I was shocked, excited, like all right then, THEY DO exist, you know. [clever filmmaker edit here, making it SEEM as if Bob has changed his mind]... Well I've thought about this many, many times over the years. At one time in my life right shortly after the film footage I was totally convinced that no one could fool me. And of course I'm an older man now, and I see a lot of things, and I think there could have been a possibility. But it would have to have been really well planned by Roger, and I feel that they would have had to have been very, very careful because I had a thirty-ought-six loaded with a hundred and eighty grain bullets. And if that thing had have turned and rushed me I would have shot it. So I feel that IF that was a hoax somebody was taking an AWFUL big chance with their life."

      A "clever" film edit, i.e., the usual mainstream corruption.

      Gimlin makes the obvious and correct point here about the loaded weapon he was carrying.

      You didn't mention that, 4:43.

      Funny, that.

      Delete
    7. ^ i pwnd his moms sweet ass with my footer last night

      Delete
    8. No need to mention that when roger and Bob made an agreement not to shoot anything unless it attacked them. Pwned.

      Delete
    9. Roger and Bob were also not together on the morning of the filming. And Lets just ignore the fact bobs horse didn't make anywhere near as deep impressions as patty even though the surface area of the horses foot is far smaller.

      Footers really have nothing in their favour. A film in the 60s that has more smoking guns for being a hoax than a Clint Eastern western and nothing else. No body, no parts, no DNA, no hair, no scat, no signs of shelter, no food remains, no roadkills in a country that has been FULLY explored and settled in with major mass mega fauna cullings. Delusion is an understatement.

      Pwned.

      Delete
    10. Pwnd is an overstatement

      Delete
    11. Or that Roger and Bob were both flaming homosexuals that often dressed up in various furry outfits for their disgusting role playing.

      Delete
    12. so who are you trying to convince the footers or yourself?

      Delete
    13. Hey 5;10, what's a Clint Eastern western? LMAO. Ain't that an ox-moron.

      Delete
    14. Gimlin is in way too deep to admit a hoax now.

      Delete
    15. ^too dumb to realise it was autocorrect

      Delete
    16. Ugh. Everyone(doubter or advocate) who knows all the undisputed background info understands that a hoax would have required Gimlin's participation...

      Delete
    17. If its not a hoax then it requires a monkey. Pwned.

      Delete
    18. can i have someone's credit card number?

      Delete
    19. PWNING RIGHTS REVOKED.

      Trollandia; Statutes of limitations:

      <Pwning
      Article C
      Section $7,5000

      Delete
    20. Read "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.

      No doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.

      Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.

      Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.

      Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.

      Delete
    21. "AnonymousMonday, May 13, 2013 at 5:10:00 PM PDT
      Roger and Bob were also not together on the morning of the filming. And Lets just ignore the fact bobs horse didn't make anywhere near as deep impressions as patty even though the surface area of the horses foot is far smaller.

      Footers really have nothing in their favour. A film in the 60s that has more smoking guns for being a hoax than a Clint Eastern western and nothing else. No body, no parts, no DNA, no hair, no scat, no signs of shelter, no food remains, no roadkills in a country that has been FULLY explored and settled in with major mass mega fauna cullings. Delusion is an understatement.

      Pwned."

      The creature was in a muddy creek-bed, the horses were on rocky limestone terrain.. what exactly is your point?

      Delete
    22. If the best the skeptard has is Chris Packham then I Worry for you.

      His PGF documentary was a disaster. Almost ruined his career.

      MMG

      Delete
    23. Those of you who try to reason with the dim-witted fools who simply say "pawned" as they attempt to re-hash incorrect facts or leave out obvious truths in their meagor attempts to disprove the "bleever" are just as foolish as them.

      Most of these zit faced cornholers never leave their bedrooms or basements. Why should anything they say mean anything? Answer: It doesn't to anyone who has a life.

      Delete
    24. So now people are saying Patterson hoaxed even Gimlin? Well he took a mighty dangerous chance. I hope the Patterson personally loaded Gimlin's rifle with blanks. What if Gimlin had panicked when he saw Patty and shot it? And if it was a man (doubt it was Hieronimus) in a suit, they could've been looking a manslaughter/murder charges. Think it was worth it to risk that?

      Delete
  4. Here's a better caption:

    Pwned

    Pwned

    Pwned

    ReplyDelete
  5. My wife got out of the house. I would know those hairy ass legs anywhere.
    Or...

    I took that pic right after Sasquatch sodomized me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice fake shadows on the side facing the light source. This hoaxer should studied up a little bit on proper shading techniques. Also looks like it's supposed to be 30 feet tall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it's rare but not unheard of.

      - Bobo

      Delete
    2. Get a life. Go outside. I am confident you have never used a trail camera, never hunted, never been in the outdoors. You are not an expert in shading. You do not understand how trail cameras work, you need to go play your X-box tubby.

      Delete
    3. Thirty feet tall? Again with the foolish, unlearned comments. If the trail cam is approx. 3 ft. off the ground, the upper thigh is probably four feet high. This would make what/who ever is attached to the leg around seven to eight feet. Not thirty feet.

      Delete
  7. That'd be funny if he stood more to his left. We'd see if bigFOOT really means.....bigDONG.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The rule of footing:

    If the photo clearly shows something that is a known animal then ignore it.

    If the photo is an ambiguous or blurry POS then claim it to be a bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like a hairy leg to me, quit whining

      Delete
    2. /feels a syllogism coming on. lies down.

      Delete
    3. uh huh huh huh huh you said gism .. cool

      Delete
    4. Read "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.

      No doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.

      Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.

      Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.

      Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.

      Delete
    5. So, based on your comment, what is this? The picture clearly shows a humanoid type of leg. Clearly defined knee cap, thigh, lower leg, hair covered. What is it if not a sasquatch?

      Delete
  9. That's Michael Merchant frolicking naked in the woods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.

      No doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.

      Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.

      Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.

      Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.

      Delete
  10. Bigfoot haiku:

    Bob G hoaxed footers
    Cashes in at conferences
    Scammed and pwned you all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^pwned gold member that thinks he will get to see hank soon

      Delete
    2. Lame guy bleeves in foots
      Saves all Ketchum profile pics
      Retreats to basement

      Delete
    3. ^ pwned gold member that thinks he will get to see hank soon.

      Delete
    4. Yeah, squatch poetry! Now that's what I'm talking about. Haikus no less.

      No doubt about it; bigfoot people are very sophisticated.

      Delete
    5. ^ pwned gold member that still thinks he will get to see hank soon.

      Delete
    6. aaaannd ... you're still lame

      Delete
    7. This is one raging pwned footer ya'll. watch out!

      Delete
    8. My bigfoot haiku....

      Naked man in woods
      Idiots see a hairy man
      All of them are gay

      Delete
    9. Nice job but watch out for lame guy. His tater is rashed out tonight!

      Delete
    10. Lame is the new pwned. Ruined for all, thanks.

      - stand-in guy

      Delete
    11. Hey 6:07. You've got one too many syllables in the second line. So, what you got there is not a haiku. In fact, it sucks really bad.

      Delete
    12. PWNING RIGHTS UNDER REVOKED.

      Trollandia; Statutes of limitations:

      <Pwning
      Article C
      Section $7,5000

      Delete
    13. LAME RIGHTS UNDER REVIEW.

      Trollandia; Statutes of limitations:

      <Lame
      Article C
      Section $7,5000

      Delete
    14. People with no life
      Basement dwellers yes they are
      Wait, wait to be first

      Delete
  11. Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or
    did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with
    a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine.
    Please let me know where you got your theme.
    Kudos

    Here is my web site: permanent hair straightening

    ReplyDelete
  12. Replies
    1. Oh, it's happening alright. You might as well smoke some cheap crack. It'll have the same effect.

      Delete
  13. On that point are several different kinds of the top fashion gurus free music the required permits
    offered. The Bollywood songs can be found elaborate and lavishly
    filmed.

    Here is my web-site; szamba betonowe

    ReplyDelete
  14. I really enjoy this web-site! Make quickly to my site for sweet offerings,
    gifting baskets, customized, blueberry bagels in quantity and
    kindly made nothings with blurry adornments.

    Visit my web-site; I got nothing and I liked it

    ReplyDelete
  15. Replies
    1. Likes to lick the middle leg of a moose.^

      Delete
  16. I've said it before and I'll say it again. If this image is a real bigfoots leg, when we get to know them they are going to have to raise the hoops a little higher in the NBA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not as hairy as the creature in the PGF. So, one of the two is fake.

      Delete
    2. But if they are like people they come in many shapes and sizes. And colors too

      Delete
    3. And are a 6-12 foot people that elude capture, camera, and solid evidence of any kind.

      Delete
    4. If y'all have a problem accepting the IDEa of bigfootwhy are u even here ??

      Delete
    5. Speaking for myself only, I love magical monkeys and the extremely credulous. Highly entertaining.

      Delete
    6. ^ thats what i was thinking

      Delete
    7. Magic monkey in my pants
      and it does a funny dance
      when it comes into the room
      people hit it with a broom

      Delete
    8. If y'all have a problem accepting the IDEa of bigfootwhy are u even here ??

      Still no answer.....???

      Delete
    9. Hula hoop girl and I like nothings. Is that so wrong?

      Delete
    10. tantric. Nothing is better than something. And the nothing here is some of the very best. Gourmet level. Believe me, I've been to the Midwest and other legendary nothing places. And this place aces them all. Iconic.

      Delete
    11. Dude wants to be a woman. ^

      Delete
    12. I come here for the bigfoot poetry.

      Delete
    13. There was a bigfoot named Patty
      Who looked like a great big fatty
      She's in the pics at frame 386
      With a suit that looks kinda ratty

      Delete
  17. If you desire to obtain a good deal from this post then you have to apply these techniques to your won blog.


    my web site; diaper rash home remedies

    ReplyDelete
  18. Try to set up experienced professionals for your wedding sounds.
    How many symbolism can you hear painted in audio tones?



    My site ... szamba

    ReplyDelete
  19. It's something small close to the camera, like climbing the tree its on. Not a large animal on the ground. jeez...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats quite the muscle definition for a squirrel

      Delete
    2. It's not just a "leg" its part of the body, and a leg.

      Lower abdomen, and part of back leg of something climbing the tree the camera is mounted on.

      Delete
  20. ranae holland's uncontrollable bush

    ReplyDelete
  21. The leg is obviously real. It confirms on 19 out of 20 points. Including the conical head that can clearly be seen in the shadow. This ranks as the number 2 photo of all time, just behind the photo of freezer moron in his drawers.

    Www.facebook.fakingbigfoot.com

    ReplyDelete
  22. (clive squashy) -The Sloppy Joe Diaries-

    Page 5 *1st memories*

    ...As our neighbor described the hairy monster he'd spotted peeking in his window the day before...I knew it was the same thing that'd been staying under my bed at night.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Y'all motherfuckers need a lesson in humility. You've all let bigfootery slide down the slippery slope of a nipple that's too dirty even for ole BobG to touch.

    In the end we hoaxed the whole thing, brought the clap home to our respectives (that's why Bob didn't tour with us) You all bought it up hook line and sinker.

    You've gotten nothing and you've liked it. Every fucking step of the way.

    ReplyDelete
  24. A game hunter familiar with Manitoba wildlife would have immediately identified this leg as belonging to a North-Western Moose (Alces alces andersoni).

    Where's the monkey?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely no way it's a moose leg, google moose pics and look at their legs, I mean really, really study the legs in the thpusands of photos, anatomically a moose leg doesn't match that pic and doesn't from any and all angles.

      I'm not saying its a bigfoot, but I sure as hell know its not an ungulate, domestic or wild.

      Delete
    2. ^^^^^^ Hey dumb ass, this guy is a hoaxer. A hoaxer because the guy knew exactly what it was but chose to try and fool the Bigfoot Community anyway. Here's another game cam photo from the same guy taken by the same camera and within 5 days of the date he supposedly took picture.

      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pcKBwi2Q_hU/UHxncAFzc4I/AAAAAAAAAng/S9mfVACD0yk/s1600/moose.jpg

      Delete
    3. So, a bigfoot and a moose can't walk in the same area with in five days of each other?

      Delete
    4. ^^^^^Patently retarded.

      Delete
    5. Sooo.........a bigfoot and a moose CAN walk in front of the same trail cam within five days of each other!

      Delete
    6. Anything is possible

      -Chris Noel

      Delete
  25. BRUINS 5....Leafs 4....O.T.



    BRUINS!

    ReplyDelete
  26. I dοn't leave many responses, however i did a few searching and wound up here "New Photo: Game Cam Sasquatch Leg". And I actually do have 2 questions for you if it's allгight.

    Coulԁ it bе only me or does it appear likе some of the rеmarks аppear lіke coming
    from bгain dead visitors? :-P And, if you are pоsting at aԁditional
    ѕoсiаl sіtеs, I wοuld like to follow anythіng frеsh yоu have to ρost.
    Coulԁ you list of the completе urlѕ of your
    public pаges like уour twitter feed,
    Fасebook pagе oг linkedin ргofile?


    Feеl freе to νisit my blog post Same Day Payday Loans

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hey Shawn, this guy is a hoaxer. A hoaxer because the guy knew exactly what it was but chose to try and fool the Bigfoot Community anyway. Here's another game cam photo from the same guy taken by the same camera and within 5 days of the picture above.

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pcKBwi2Q_hU/UHxncAFzc4I/AAAAAAAAAng/S9mfVACD0yk/s1600/moose.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hey, at least it wasn't a leaf.

      Delete
    2. And damn near close to the same exact "time", its less than 9 minutes apart actually. This guy just changed the date stamp. May have had better luck fooling imbeciles if he wouldn't have posted pics of this encounter (with a moose) on the Internet previously. He's not a very bright hoaxer. Most aren't.

      Delete
    3. The problem with the moose, is that it has a bulbous knee joint, like elk and deer. In the photo, the knee is the opposite of bulbous.

      Delete
    4. There is no problem with it being a moose, that's because its a moose. The problem is simply that you're a footer and automatically anoint ambiguous photos as Bigfoot. Just look at the Jacobs photos as an example. Check mate.

      Delete
    5. It's not a moose, it may be a squatch..............

      Jacobs photo is not a squatch, its a bear.

      This however is not a moose, not an elk, deer, bear, wolf, rainbow trout, musky, walleye, or salmon

      Delete
  28. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well
    written article. I'll be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will definitely comeback.

    my website; coconut oil for hair

    ReplyDelete
  29. After reviewing photos of moose, elk and deer, in my opinion we narrowly missed another Anthony Weiner type scandal, as perpetrated by a Sasquatch that apparently follows the grocery store rumor magazines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.

      No doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.

      Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.

      Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.

      Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.

      Delete
  30. That looks like it could be MY own hairy leg with bad knees. Or it could've been a Greek or Sicilian nudist.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bigfoot is remarkably well groomed in this photo.

    ReplyDelete
  32. thigh
    kness
    shin
    surely the calf cant be at the front

    I also am impressed how well groomed BFs are. id have thought theyd have a lot of hair,to keep them warm,shows u what I know.
    what a crok

    ReplyDelete
  33. fake. why is every bigfoot pic a single shot or blurry blobs. take away the ,for me, man in a suit 50yearold film,and thers nothing left, eye witness accounts, footprints and this type of thing. why is it never showing the oney shot,is BF teasing us, let me stand 2 inches from showing my dick to the tail cam.

    you guys don't actually believe his nonsense. the law of averages tells us that half of the pics,trail cam shots etc...would show face limbs, genitalia

    ah fucjk it,i believe too. there are definitely thousands of apepeople in USA.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?