New Photo: Game Cam Sasquatch Leg
This strange looking image of a partial leg possibly belonging to "Bigfoot" is was posted by Ken Cook on April 5, 2013. It was supposedly shot on a game cam in Grand Rapids, Manitoba back in September 14, 2012. According to Ken, the camera was about 3 feet above the tree. Here's the high-rez photo:
First! Pwned!
ReplyDeletethat is not what a Bigfoot leg looks like!
DeleteFake.
That IS what your mums ham-bone looks like though.
DeleteeBay sucks!!
DeleteeBay steals!!
eBay lies!!
eBay sucks ass!
DeleteYeah. This is the real deal folks.
DeleteIts a picture of A Tree.
A picture of a tree? I clearly see a picture of someone's/something's leg, thigh, knee cap, etc. Man if you are thinking that is a tree you are definately a hardcore skeptic.
Deleteit's a hairy dego leg! period end of the story. it says October on the pic, come oct. you better have more hair than that covering your body for the winter. fake, hoax or what ever you want to call it.
DeleteFirst!
ReplyDeletePwned like Biscardi in a mockumentary
DeletePwned like Fb/Fb traveling thousands of miles to see a documentary that Pwned footers.
DeleteI pwnd your moms sweet ass with my footer last night
DeletePwned like your mom guy with my mom's anal warts.
DeleteLame
Delete^ your mom guy
DeleteNope and you're still lame
Delete^ bought the platinum membership to see hank. Can't believe the pwnage he endures.
DeleteStill lame
DeletePWNING RIGHTS UNDER REVIEW.
DeleteTrollandia; Statute of limitations:
<Pwning
Article C
Section $7,5000
When lame guy says lame
DeleteWhat he means is he is gay
Makes love to a sock
I love lamp.
Delete6:29 you stop flirting with me you silly goose you
DeleteIdiots.
DeleteWhy did Bob gimlin say to Chris packham that there is chance roger hoaxed him that day yet you don't hear him say this at his paid bigfoot conferences. Funny that.
ReplyDeleteI guess there's just a slight chance, since Roger was a known liar, thief, and con man who was out of cash.
DeleteSometimes a hoaxing squirrel finds a nut.
Delete- Dick Ryder
BobG was throwing you skeptics a bone. He knows what he saw was real...
DeleteHow compassionate of Bob. Skeptics really need a lot of assistance.
Delete^another pwned footer on the pwned by patterson list.
Delete4:43, you are trying to be a disinformant. You are being selective and not reporting all. Since you asked the question, here is your answer via BIGFOOT'S bLOG:
DeleteAnd then the host Chris Packham actually calls Gimlin on the phone. The transcription: "When I first saw this thing well it was just like the adrenaline flew, you know I was shocked, excited, like all right then, THEY DO exist, you know. [clever filmmaker edit here, making it SEEM as if Bob has changed his mind]... Well I've thought about this many, many times over the years. At one time in my life right shortly after the film footage I was totally convinced that no one could fool me. And of course I'm an older man now, and I see a lot of things, and I think there could have been a possibility. But it would have to have been really well planned by Roger, and I feel that they would have had to have been very, very careful because I had a thirty-ought-six loaded with a hundred and eighty grain bullets. And if that thing had have turned and rushed me I would have shot it. So I feel that IF that was a hoax somebody was taking an AWFUL big chance with their life."
A "clever" film edit, i.e., the usual mainstream corruption.
Gimlin makes the obvious and correct point here about the loaded weapon he was carrying.
You didn't mention that, 4:43.
Funny, that.
^ i pwnd his moms sweet ass with my footer last night
DeleteNo need to mention that when roger and Bob made an agreement not to shoot anything unless it attacked them. Pwned.
Delete^ @ 4:48
DeleteRoger and Bob were also not together on the morning of the filming. And Lets just ignore the fact bobs horse didn't make anywhere near as deep impressions as patty even though the surface area of the horses foot is far smaller.
DeleteFooters really have nothing in their favour. A film in the 60s that has more smoking guns for being a hoax than a Clint Eastern western and nothing else. No body, no parts, no DNA, no hair, no scat, no signs of shelter, no food remains, no roadkills in a country that has been FULLY explored and settled in with major mass mega fauna cullings. Delusion is an understatement.
Pwned.
Pwnd is an overstatement
DeleteOr that Roger and Bob were both flaming homosexuals that often dressed up in various furry outfits for their disgusting role playing.
Deleteso who are you trying to convince the footers or yourself?
DeleteToo much reading
DeleteHey 5;10, what's a Clint Eastern western? LMAO. Ain't that an ox-moron.
DeleteGimlin is in way too deep to admit a hoax now.
Delete^ LOLZ
Delete^too dumb to realise it was autocorrect
DeleteUgh. Everyone(doubter or advocate) who knows all the undisputed background info understands that a hoax would have required Gimlin's participation...
Delete^seems legit
DeleteIf its not a hoax then it requires a monkey. Pwned.
Deletecan i have someone's credit card number?
DeletePWNING RIGHTS REVOKED.
DeleteTrollandia; Statutes of limitations:
<Pwning
Article C
Section $7,5000
Read "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.
DeleteNo doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.
Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.
Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.
Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.
"AnonymousMonday, May 13, 2013 at 5:10:00 PM PDT
DeleteRoger and Bob were also not together on the morning of the filming. And Lets just ignore the fact bobs horse didn't make anywhere near as deep impressions as patty even though the surface area of the horses foot is far smaller.
Footers really have nothing in their favour. A film in the 60s that has more smoking guns for being a hoax than a Clint Eastern western and nothing else. No body, no parts, no DNA, no hair, no scat, no signs of shelter, no food remains, no roadkills in a country that has been FULLY explored and settled in with major mass mega fauna cullings. Delusion is an understatement.
Pwned."
The creature was in a muddy creek-bed, the horses were on rocky limestone terrain.. what exactly is your point?
Too much reading
DeleteIf the best the skeptard has is Chris Packham then I Worry for you.
DeleteHis PGF documentary was a disaster. Almost ruined his career.
MMG
Those of you who try to reason with the dim-witted fools who simply say "pawned" as they attempt to re-hash incorrect facts or leave out obvious truths in their meagor attempts to disprove the "bleever" are just as foolish as them.
DeleteMost of these zit faced cornholers never leave their bedrooms or basements. Why should anything they say mean anything? Answer: It doesn't to anyone who has a life.
So now people are saying Patterson hoaxed even Gimlin? Well he took a mighty dangerous chance. I hope the Patterson personally loaded Gimlin's rifle with blanks. What if Gimlin had panicked when he saw Patty and shot it? And if it was a man (doubt it was Hieronimus) in a suit, they could've been looking a manslaughter/murder charges. Think it was worth it to risk that?
DeleteHere's a better caption:
ReplyDeletePwned
Pwned
Pwned
Puckering
DeletePuckering
Puckering
My wife got out of the house. I would know those hairy ass legs anywhere.
ReplyDeleteOr...
I took that pic right after Sasquatch sodomized me.
Nice fake shadows on the side facing the light source. This hoaxer should studied up a little bit on proper shading techniques. Also looks like it's supposed to be 30 feet tall.
ReplyDeleteWell it's rare but not unheard of.
Delete- Bobo
Bobo sounds legit.
DeleteGet a life. Go outside. I am confident you have never used a trail camera, never hunted, never been in the outdoors. You are not an expert in shading. You do not understand how trail cameras work, you need to go play your X-box tubby.
DeleteThirty feet tall? Again with the foolish, unlearned comments. If the trail cam is approx. 3 ft. off the ground, the upper thigh is probably four feet high. This would make what/who ever is attached to the leg around seven to eight feet. Not thirty feet.
DeleteThat'd be funny if he stood more to his left. We'd see if bigFOOT really means.....bigDONG.
ReplyDeleteLikes to look at big hairy dongs.^
DeleteThe rule of footing:
ReplyDeleteIf the photo clearly shows something that is a known animal then ignore it.
If the photo is an ambiguous or blurry POS then claim it to be a bigfoot.
Dead-on.
DeleteLooks like a hairy leg to me, quit whining
Delete/feels a syllogism coming on. lies down.
Deleteuh huh huh huh huh you said gism .. cool
DeleteRead "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.
DeleteNo doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.
Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.
Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.
Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.
So, based on your comment, what is this? The picture clearly shows a humanoid type of leg. Clearly defined knee cap, thigh, lower leg, hair covered. What is it if not a sasquatch?
DeleteThat's Michael Merchant frolicking naked in the woods.
ReplyDeleteRead "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.
DeleteNo doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.
Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.
Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.
Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.
Bigfoot haiku:
ReplyDeleteBob G hoaxed footers
Cashes in at conferences
Scammed and pwned you all
Lame
Delete^pwned gold member that thinks he will get to see hank soon
DeleteLame guy bleeves in foots
DeleteSaves all Ketchum profile pics
Retreats to basement
Lamer
Delete^ pwned gold member that thinks he will get to see hank soon.
DeleteYeah, squatch poetry! Now that's what I'm talking about. Haikus no less.
DeleteNo doubt about it; bigfoot people are very sophisticated.
5:33 more lame
Delete^ pwned gold member that still thinks he will get to see hank soon.
Deleteaaaannd ... you're still lame
DeleteThis is one raging pwned footer ya'll. watch out!
DeleteMy bigfoot haiku....
DeleteNaked man in woods
Idiots see a hairy man
All of them are gay
Nice job but watch out for lame guy. His tater is rashed out tonight!
DeleteI like turtles
DeleteYawn ... Lame
DeleteLame is the new pwned. Ruined for all, thanks.
Delete- stand-in guy
Hey 6:07. You've got one too many syllables in the second line. So, what you got there is not a haiku. In fact, it sucks really bad.
Deletelamwd?
DeletePWNING RIGHTS UNDER REVOKED.
DeleteTrollandia; Statutes of limitations:
<Pwning
Article C
Section $7,5000
LAME RIGHTS UNDER REVIEW.
DeleteTrollandia; Statutes of limitations:
<Lame
Article C
Section $7,5000
People with no life
DeleteBasement dwellers yes they are
Wait, wait to be first
????
DeleteAmazing blog! Is your theme custom made or
ReplyDeletedid you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with
a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine.
Please let me know where you got your theme.
Kudos
Here is my web site: permanent hair straightening
Moose leg.
ReplyDeleteThis can't be happening!
DeleteOh, it's happening alright. You might as well smoke some cheap crack. It'll have the same effect.
DeleteOn that point are several different kinds of the top fashion gurus free music the required permits
ReplyDeleteoffered. The Bollywood songs can be found elaborate and lavishly
filmed.
Here is my web-site; szamba betonowe
Moose leg...
ReplyDelete1%
I really enjoy this web-site! Make quickly to my site for sweet offerings,
ReplyDeletegifting baskets, customized, blueberry bagels in quantity and
kindly made nothings with blurry adornments.
Visit my web-site; I got nothing and I liked it
Well done sir
Deletenice moose leg
ReplyDeleteLikes to lick the middle leg of a moose.^
DeleteI've said it before and I'll say it again. If this image is a real bigfoots leg, when we get to know them they are going to have to raise the hoops a little higher in the NBA
ReplyDeleteIt's not as hairy as the creature in the PGF. So, one of the two is fake.
DeleteBut if they are like people they come in many shapes and sizes. And colors too
DeleteAnd are a 6-12 foot people that elude capture, camera, and solid evidence of any kind.
DeleteIf y'all have a problem accepting the IDEa of bigfootwhy are u even here ??
DeleteSpeaking for myself only, I love magical monkeys and the extremely credulous. Highly entertaining.
Delete^ thats what i was thinking
DeleteMagic monkey in my pants
Deleteand it does a funny dance
when it comes into the room
people hit it with a broom
If y'all have a problem accepting the IDEa of bigfootwhy are u even here ??
DeleteStill no answer.....???
Hula hoop girl and I like nothings. Is that so wrong?
Deletetantric. Nothing is better than something. And the nothing here is some of the very best. Gourmet level. Believe me, I've been to the Midwest and other legendary nothing places. And this place aces them all. Iconic.
DeleteDude wants to be a woman. ^
DeleteI come here for the bigfoot poetry.
DeleteThere was a bigfoot named Patty
DeleteWho looked like a great big fatty
She's in the pics at frame 386
With a suit that looks kinda ratty
Lame............
DeleteIf you desire to obtain a good deal from this post then you have to apply these techniques to your won blog.
ReplyDeletemy web site; diaper rash home remedies
but the rash isn't on my won blog.
DeleteTry to set up experienced professionals for your wedding sounds.
ReplyDeleteHow many symbolism can you hear painted in audio tones?
My site ... szamba
It's something small close to the camera, like climbing the tree its on. Not a large animal on the ground. jeez...
ReplyDeletenonsense
DeleteSquirrel leg.
DeleteThats quite the muscle definition for a squirrel
DeleteIt's not just a "leg" its part of the body, and a leg.
DeleteLower abdomen, and part of back leg of something climbing the tree the camera is mounted on.
ranae holland's uncontrollable bush
ReplyDeleteVery well could be true.
DeleteThe leg is obviously real. It confirms on 19 out of 20 points. Including the conical head that can clearly be seen in the shadow. This ranks as the number 2 photo of all time, just behind the photo of freezer moron in his drawers.
ReplyDeleteWww.facebook.fakingbigfoot.com
(clive squashy) -The Sloppy Joe Diaries-
ReplyDeletePage 5 *1st memories*
...As our neighbor described the hairy monster he'd spotted peeking in his window the day before...I knew it was the same thing that'd been staying under my bed at night.
Y'all motherfuckers need a lesson in humility. You've all let bigfootery slide down the slippery slope of a nipple that's too dirty even for ole BobG to touch.
ReplyDeleteIn the end we hoaxed the whole thing, brought the clap home to our respectives (that's why Bob didn't tour with us) You all bought it up hook line and sinker.
You've gotten nothing and you've liked it. Every fucking step of the way.
A game hunter familiar with Manitoba wildlife would have immediately identified this leg as belonging to a North-Western Moose (Alces alces andersoni).
ReplyDeleteWhere's the monkey?
Absolutely no way it's a moose leg, google moose pics and look at their legs, I mean really, really study the legs in the thpusands of photos, anatomically a moose leg doesn't match that pic and doesn't from any and all angles.
DeleteI'm not saying its a bigfoot, but I sure as hell know its not an ungulate, domestic or wild.
^^^^^^ Hey dumb ass, this guy is a hoaxer. A hoaxer because the guy knew exactly what it was but chose to try and fool the Bigfoot Community anyway. Here's another game cam photo from the same guy taken by the same camera and within 5 days of the date he supposedly took picture.
Deletehttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pcKBwi2Q_hU/UHxncAFzc4I/AAAAAAAAAng/S9mfVACD0yk/s1600/moose.jpg
So, a bigfoot and a moose can't walk in the same area with in five days of each other?
Delete^^^^^Patently retarded.
DeleteSooo.........a bigfoot and a moose CAN walk in front of the same trail cam within five days of each other!
DeleteAnything is possible
Delete-Chris Noel
BRUINS 5....Leafs 4....O.T.
ReplyDeleteBRUINS!
I dοn't leave many responses, however i did a few searching and wound up here "New Photo: Game Cam Sasquatch Leg". And I actually do have 2 questions for you if it's allгight.
ReplyDeleteCoulԁ it bе only me or does it appear likе some of the rеmarks аppear lіke coming
from bгain dead visitors? :-P And, if you are pоsting at aԁditional
ѕoсiаl sіtеs, I wοuld like to follow anythіng frеsh yоu have to ρost.
Coulԁ you list of the completе urlѕ of your
public pаges like уour twitter feed,
Fасebook pagе oг linkedin ргofile?
Feеl freе to νisit my blog post Same Day Payday Loans
My URL is www.braindeadvisitor.com
DeleteHey Shawn, this guy is a hoaxer. A hoaxer because the guy knew exactly what it was but chose to try and fool the Bigfoot Community anyway. Here's another game cam photo from the same guy taken by the same camera and within 5 days of the picture above.
ReplyDeletehttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pcKBwi2Q_hU/UHxncAFzc4I/AAAAAAAAAng/S9mfVACD0yk/s1600/moose.jpg
hey, at least it wasn't a leaf.
DeleteAnd damn near close to the same exact "time", its less than 9 minutes apart actually. This guy just changed the date stamp. May have had better luck fooling imbeciles if he wouldn't have posted pics of this encounter (with a moose) on the Internet previously. He's not a very bright hoaxer. Most aren't.
DeleteThe problem with the moose, is that it has a bulbous knee joint, like elk and deer. In the photo, the knee is the opposite of bulbous.
DeleteThere is no problem with it being a moose, that's because its a moose. The problem is simply that you're a footer and automatically anoint ambiguous photos as Bigfoot. Just look at the Jacobs photos as an example. Check mate.
DeleteIt's not a moose, it may be a squatch..............
DeleteJacobs photo is not a squatch, its a bear.
This however is not a moose, not an elk, deer, bear, wolf, rainbow trout, musky, walleye, or salmon
leg of lamb
ReplyDeleteIt's an elephant weener.
ReplyDeleteHey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well
ReplyDeletewritten article. I'll be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will definitely comeback.
my website; coconut oil for hair
After reviewing photos of moose, elk and deer, in my opinion we narrowly missed another Anthony Weiner type scandal, as perpetrated by a Sasquatch that apparently follows the grocery store rumor magazines.
ReplyDeleteRead "The Great Pony Poop Caper" for almost unending laughs.
DeleteNo doubt the story is as true as the sky is blue.
Peter Byrne has NEVER been implicated in a hoax. To me, if a man can go 50+ years involved in this field without ever being labeled as a hoaxer then you know he is straight up. Think about it......"so-called" researchers today are lucky to go 3 years without being implicated in a hoax.
Peter also outs the new sellout Michael Merchants idle Loren Coleman as a thief in another story. Not my accusations, its all on the web to read for yourself if interested. I believe Byrne on that one too, I mean just read up on Loren Coleman's "NAPE" print. Hahahaha, truly laughable stuff guys. Time doesn't forget.
Byrne also outed Ivan Marx.....Peter Byrne is a good dude and one helluva Bigfoot encyclopedia.
That looks like it could be MY own hairy leg with bad knees. Or it could've been a Greek or Sicilian nudist.
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is remarkably well groomed in this photo.
ReplyDeletethigh
ReplyDeletekness
shin
surely the calf cant be at the front
I also am impressed how well groomed BFs are. id have thought theyd have a lot of hair,to keep them warm,shows u what I know.
what a crok
fake. why is every bigfoot pic a single shot or blurry blobs. take away the ,for me, man in a suit 50yearold film,and thers nothing left, eye witness accounts, footprints and this type of thing. why is it never showing the oney shot,is BF teasing us, let me stand 2 inches from showing my dick to the tail cam.
ReplyDeleteyou guys don't actually believe his nonsense. the law of averages tells us that half of the pics,trail cam shots etc...would show face limbs, genitalia
ah fucjk it,i believe too. there are definitely thousands of apepeople in USA.