Comments on Frontiers of Zoology: More Materials On Differentiating Bigfoot, Yeti, Skunk Ape, Wildman, and Sasquatch
Editor’s Note: This is a guest post by Jay of the Bizarre Zoology blog. For info on weird and amazing facts/theories of zoology, paleontology, and cryptozoology visit Bizarre Zoology blog or follow him on Twitter.(The article which I will be referring to & referencing is here. Please read it for full information. Please note that I don't necessarily support this theory by sharing this article here)
Dale Drinnon, author of Frontiers of Zoology who has a degree in anthropology, and I have recently been professionally debating a theory online. Mr. Drinnon holds the theory that reports of "Bigfoot" in North America consist of three distinct and different species. His newest article, which is basically a short overview of this theory and the alleged key differences the different species, is partly a rebuttal to me. Dale Drinnon has theorized that the three species behind "Bigfoot" in North America are a Neanderthaloid species which is a member of the genus Homo, a pongid species which leaves footprints that display a divergent big toe, and a species which is like a bipedal ape with humanoid feet (identical to the animal filmed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967).
Continue reading "Comments on Frontiers of Zoology: More Materials On Differentiating Bigfoot, Yeti, Skunk Ape, Wildman, and Sasquatch" at Bizarre Zoology blog
Read it and still got first? Wow!
ReplyDeleteHa ha. You ain't first. You should have posted before you read the article. Amateur.
ReplyDeleteAmateur, or innovator? Dare I say prodigy?
ReplyDeleteDare I say loser who wasn't first and can't accept the fact that he embarrassed himself royally?
ReplyDeleteDifferentiate between bigfoot and sasquatch? What? Everyone knows that they're one and the same creature.
ReplyDeleteCORRECT! THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME AND NEITHER EXIST! WAKE UP IDIOTS!!
DeleteThey don't exist? Prove it.
DeleteYou can't, can you? So shad ap.
Oh, but you can prove that they do?? Let's engage, shall we?
DeleteYou're the one showing up on a bigfoot blog who doesn't believe that bigfoot exists? Why?
DeleteMost people here don't need convincing that bigfoot may exist. That's why they're on a bigfoot blog. In this venue, the burden of proof that bigfoot does not exists rests on skeptics like you.
I, like most on this site, come here for entertainment. Its quite amusing to watch you fools search for something that doesn't and CANT exist.
DeleteTrailcams all over the nation capture CLEAR images of a variety of wildlife on a daily basis yet no bigfoot. We can literally reconstruct animals that ived millions of years ago yet we do not possess one single shred of evidence that supports the theory that a giant ape lives in north america. Do you understand how large the population of said ape would have to be to sustain life? And sustain it to date?
Where's your proof? Blurry photos? That's all you have yet you continue to swing on hopes of nothing!
Lmao
No evidence? Are you f@#king kidding me? You've obviously not read Dr Ketchum's incredible paper!
DeleteWhy are you laughing? Mulder! The skeptards are laughing at me again. You said if I mentioned the DNA stuff that would show em...
Apologies once again folks.
MMG
Evidence in the eyes of a believer of a magic ape is not considered evidence in the eyes of science and zoology. Dr. Ketchum's opinions and views are your evidence? Lmao
DeleteThere are an estimated 2,000 sasquatches ranging from northern California up through British Columbia (I personally don't believe that they live in any other part of North America). Just as wih rare Siberian tigers, these sasquatch are widely dispersed and live in very remote areas. They are seldom seen (but seen they are from time to time).
DeleteSasquatch are believed to be highly intelligent primates (perhaps the second most intelligent creature on earth after man). This intelligence coupled with their shyness is likely why they are so elusive. Many people don't grasp how vast the forests are in the Pacific northwest. When I visited that region for the first time in 2011, after seeing the area, I had no doubt that an animal could live there and remain virtually undetected.
Just as with other real animals in other parts of the world, folklore mythology has grown around the sasquatch. This has lead to the current wave of sasquatch hoaxing and nuttines. People can and do make money with the bigfoot mystery, and this is a magnet for hoaxers.
As Jane Goodall has commented, there have been just too many sightings by too many legitimate, trustworthy people to dismiss the reality of sasquatch out of hand.
10 DAYS! Tick tock tick tock.....
DeleteThe small print says that refunds are not available on any gold memberships purchased.
DeleteMMG
6:22 That is the only plausible scenario; its basically what Krantz adhered to. Even for this case, though, we should have some physical or undisputed visual evidence.....
DeleteWell, there never will be indisputable visual evidence. You could have a sasquatch on video in perfect focus three feet from the camera and there would still be people who would say it's a hoax. As for physical evidence, there has been enough to convince learned people that the reality of sasquatch should not be entirely dismissed out of hand.
DeleteThe elusiveness is likely due to small numbers and much greater intelligence than other animals. If you were on the run and hiding in the vast forests of the Pacific Northwest, do you think that you could remain elusive to the small number of bigfoot hunters with their amateur equipment?
What a loony, ignorant moron. He contradicts himself.
DeleteToo much reading
DeleteWhere does he or she contradict?
DeleteYeah, 10:38! Don't use a derogatory ad hominem argument? Let's hear the contradictions.
DeleteSecond isn't one bit embarrassing! And I've been first before. I have seen the top of the mountain, and it is good.
ReplyDeleteOne time in Spanish class my junior year, I came in to class late and then sat on my balls. So I jumped up and yelled, and when everyone turned to look what happened, I couldn't think of an excuse, so I just said "I sat on my balls".
THAT was royally embarrassing.
Well, second is embarrassing after you claim to be first and use "wow" to describe being first.
ReplyDelete^^^ Pissed cos he can't sit on his own balls.
ReplyDeleteMMG
If you could read, you would be able to tell that I was talking about the guy above me reading it and getting first. Its all spelled out pretty clear there
ReplyDeleteWanna know what I think? Pure bullshit of an article about a bullshit topic. Stop wasting life and energy on bullshit jay.
ReplyDelete#wannaknowwhatithinkguy
^ well you're wasting your life coming here and reading it so STFU Moron!
Delete^^^ wanna know what I think? You should give me your mom's number. I bet she never had a real man.
Delete#wannaknowwhatithinkguy
Why do people hashtag in blogs, email and sms? Totally pointless.
DeleteMMG
Michigan sucks!
Delete#wannaknowwhatithinkguy
1:37 your mom was embarrassing last night
ReplyDelete1:37 your mom sat on my balls last night ..(twofer)
ReplyDeleteJay this was an interesting read. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteGood thing you're anonymous, because you should be the embarrassed one now
ReplyDeleteyou all sound like a bunch of little girls.
ReplyDeleteJay you should maybe submit your articles to bigfoot buzz or maybe some other alternative. Not many posters here seem very interested in anything other than silly name calling and petty arguments.
ReplyDeleteSo wait, now there are three magical apes?
ReplyDeleteMichael Kors Outlet Online
ReplyDeleteKate Spade Outlet
MCM Backpack Outlet
MCM Backpack
UGG Boot Clearance
Oakley Sunglasses Outlet
North Face Outlet Online
Marc by Marc Jacobs