Breaking: Bart Cutino & Contributors Release Mind-blowing Sierras Thermal Footage Package
Here it is ladies and gentlemen, the thermal footage of multiple sasquatches taken in the Sierras last August. The following package is one of the most extensive breakdowns of any known Bigfoot footage or encounter of any kind for that matter in the history of the subject.
In the days to come, I will be posting detailed accounts of what went down in the early morning hours of August 25th, 2012. As a journalist, I’ve remained completely objective and stayed out of the investigation - patiently waiting for the conclusion and 8 months later, we’re now certain the subjects in the thermal footage are sasquatches. I was there standing next to Bart Cutino during the filming of the subjects (Listen to audio with video). This may not be the Holy Grail of Bigfoot videos, as Bart has been the first one to tell you since day one, but the investigation that went into this package is extraordinary, especially since most of the effort was set on debunking and “destroying” the footage and Bart and company wanted to use this opportunity to raise the bar in video documentation in the field!
The package contains the following (look carefully for all links and PDF downloads):
- Bart Cutino's Witness and Q&A reports
- Robert Leiterman's Introduction & Analysis Report
- Sierras Thermal Footage Video/audio uncut Sync in real time
- Phils Poling’s Sierras Thermal Footage breakdown
- 5 minute "continuous action" footage
- 11 videos documenting the whole re-creation process on-site
Again... everything that’s listed above has been posted on the Sierra Evidence Initiative’s website: www.sierrasiteproject.com
First??
ReplyDeleteNope. Like this: First!
DeleteI feel nervous every time I come out of my moms basement. That's how I KNOW there are Bigfoots around.
DeleteStep aside pissant. You don't get to do that here. Maybe somewhere else, but you don't get to pull that shit here.
DeleteYou have no proof skeptard!!! When I say it it carries weight. When you say it I say prove it.
For the record, this is Mulder and I never lived in my mom's basement. They kept me up in the attic.
OMG! Forget this footage! The squatchmaster has a new youtube upload! Now here is a real pro!
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FomB6Qrpp8I
your kidding rght???"Squatchmaster" couldn't hold a candle to the work these guys did
DeleteFilming your mates on thermal aint gonna cut it. Got monkey?
DeleteWOULD YOU BELIEVE....
DeleteThe Germans built a time machine in 1922 for communicating with
Aldeberan?
Aliens helped the Nazis build flying saucers?
Aliens gave Hitler a cloned army of stormtroopers?
Nikola Tesla had "offf-planet" friends?
WWII was an extraterrestrial battle?
The surviving Roswell alien helped us communicate with Serpo in
Zeta Reticuli?
Ex-nazi scientists helped us develop anti-gravity aircraft in the fifties?
President Eisenhower turned down a deal with extraterrestrials?
We sent 12 American astronauts to Zeta Reticuli on an alien space
ship in 1965?
Grey aliens are cross-breeding with humans to develop a hybrid race?
We invaded Iraq to get control of a stargate?
Bigfoot is real and from Uranus?
Mulder don't listen to the real fake mulder. I know how you feel the light and real life can be very very scary. But there's help we suffer a very popular nervous issue. So see a psychiatrist and let them know you and I are suffering agoraphobia. If they give you advice please tell me so I to may venture from my moms basement. If it is medication please tell me what kind so as I can have my female dr. make a house call to my house. As the biggest agoraphobic MK Davis says thank you for your time.
Deleteno, i wouldn't believe any of that shit.
DeleteXanax and Vodka. You wouldn't believe all the mythical creatures I see when I am plowed. Makes old women look young. Ugly ones beautiful. Can't nuthin help make em skinny though.
DeleteI'll be darned--my first try. I can die now.
ReplyDeleteAnd on a big story too!
DeleteNot so fast there T- we'vebeen hurt before. What makes these thermal smears so special?
DeleteThe thermal + eye witness sighting at the same time by two different people + all of the hard work put into disproving it and all fall short to prove that this video is a lie. Its not proof of bigfoot, its further evidence of the existence of something they are searching for.
DeleteWell, I like that he came right out and said "this isn't proof, its not high quality, and we're going to fully document all of this" instead of the normal approach people have of playing footage up, then when its finally released its a big pile of shit. That being said, I haven't had time to watch it yet, so I could change my mind
Delete"objective"...lol
ReplyDeleteYet "mind blowing" at the same time
DeleteI think Shawn's referring to all the analysis, not the footage dickhead.
Deleteat least that's what I read
Analysis done by whom? Oh yeah, a Tazer, I mean Yeti guy.
DeleteHis name is Phil Poling, he isnt hiding his feelings or beliefs like you are Mr. Anonymous.
DeleteAnd he is someone who is constantly proving people are hoaxing and faking, and also leaving in his comments and observations which are much more important than trolls on the internet. He puts his work out there to be judged and it stands time and time again. The man isnt some lying hoaxer like the rest of youtube as your assuming. Maybe you should go back to Youtube, and stay there.
That was one link, I like Phil and his work, who cares if he's Tazer. Also like the work Robert and Bart did to back this footage up.
DeleteYes actually Shaun was being objective he said he was there he didn't whether he liked or hated it. He didn't spout on about he said it was a huge undertaking. With the number of people there it was a huge undertaking. So everything Shaun has stated above was objective. You may not have been alive long enough to even have seen objective journalism. But that's what that was guaranteed.
DeleteOh and for the record I hate team taste these nuts too.
DeleteReally ? You believe shawn is an objective journalist? This must be your first time on this site. I enjoy the site but it is incredibly biased.
DeleteThere is no more Team Tazer fuckass
DeleteNo shit really? Wow I must have missed that memo! Guess what a dickhead by any other name is still a dickhead! And I was speaking of as far as this article Shaun was being objective anon. And no I'm not new here actually I'm a veteran and world class firster. And if it makes you feel better pro fine I hate team gettin zen from molestering yetis. And on no other article has Shaun ever claimed objectivity and I know most articles are incredibly bias but he never claimed objectivity on those so I overlook it and form my own opinion as he says I should do.
DeleteAnd see pro I actually agreed with you and before now thought you were cool so much so that I was prepared to get you represented by an agent to get your idea onto animal planet but you never contacted me so now what!
Deleteanony 10:12
Deleteshawn was never part of anything like this happening, so you can't compare it.
this was first rate man and can't wait to start reading these reports now
An objective journalist does not describe what he is reporting on as "mind blowing", he presents the facts and lets his readers decide if it is mind blowing or not. Shawn is a blogger who does not adhere to even the lowest of journalistic standards.
DeleteUnbelievable job Bart, thank you for everything
ReplyDeleteI was beginning to wonder if you were ever going to release this and when I saw all the work you guys did, I know why. wish there was more of this in bigfooting
Very True indeed 5:15.
DeleteThanks for releasing this guys. A tremendous amount of work went into this from what I can see. Outstanding.
There are many "bigfoot researchers" out there who would have sat on this footage, anticipating a payout from someone.
I give Bart and his guys a huge round of applause for this as I think he footage and investigative work were off the chart, like best ever!!!!
DeleteI also think those are real squatches as the more I've read and understand what these guys did the more confidant I am in the results. I think some people see what they think is an ambiguous video but this is amazing with audio while Bart is filming these things. I'm on the third report and I feel like I'm reading a book I can't put down with so many great pictures. Just amazing guys!
Bart, Robert, Phil, Shawn evidence
Great work guys!! great work
If you see people attacking this effort you know they didn't take the time to go through any of this stuff you provided
Bravo!!!
Bill H
what he said ^
Delete-apehuman
Ditto. One can tell just from a quick overview of their website that lot of work went into this. Even better, its all being presented in an honest manner without any grandiose claims....
DeleteI got nothing and I liked it, once again.
ReplyDeleteYeah I had that got nothing amd liked it moment too. Then I looked beyond the footage and I suddenly wanna Western Umion some bucks to Ketchum or Blevins.
Delete"As a journalist"... Who's a journalist here?
ReplyDeleteFake, fake, fake.
LOL what a F'n joke. There's 3 6+ foot creatures less than 100 yards from you and you are explicitly searching for this creature and this is your best evidence. Fabulous.
DeleteIm a crypto-journaist. Gimme some moneys.
DeleteShawn is a journalist? LMAO the guy posts a girl playing with a hoola hoop
DeleteAn absolutely underwhelming video. Good grief...
ReplyDelete...my mind does not feel blown. Or any other part of me, for that matter...
DeleteI disagree, I've only read 2 of the PDF's and saw Polings breakdown so far but this is pretty amazing with the comparisons and the work some of these guys did.
DeleteLOL this is better than most but isn't evidence of any sort and is far from amazing. Blobsquatch on a therm.
DeleteInteresting, maybe. But not mind blowing. Sigh. Getting nothing makes me sigh.
DeleteYou punks above need to take the time to go through what he provided us before jumping to conclusions. There is a lot here, they did an amazing job with this. It may not be the best thermal footage out there, but they did what real researchers are suppose to do. A lot of people could learn from this. Open your closed minds.
DeleteOverjustification much? Bears.
ReplyDeleteOr a lemur piggy-backing a panda.
Deletewell those things are definitely on two legs and pretty tall.
Deletethose ain't bears 5:33. Now that's just ignorant
There are no bears in North America.
DeleteChicago.
DeleteObama hunted bear in Chicago as a yoof politician. Not black or brown bears, amd not muslim bears either. Just the plain ole polar bears of illinois.
DeleteI wish this idiotic "much" person would go away. Sharon? Or some other snob who cheated on his or her mensa exams?
DeleteProbably is that dingbat
DeleteSmeja was snoring? Shoulda been popping some caps in these unrecognizable thingies on therm. So much for being an American hero. You should turn in your flannel cutoffs at the office tomorrow, Justin.
ReplyDeleteI heard he was farting and giggling in his sleep, too.
Deleteyeah! He shoulda blew em way! Smeja still leads the hunt....
DeleteSmeja=2
Dyer=1
Bugs=2(?)
^^^Oh, Gimlin and Patterson, I forgot...they are in the lead. A whole whopping family of em!
DeleteTHIS IS IT!! THIS PROVES THE EXISTENCE OF BIGFOOT!! Jesus christ, WAKE UP IDIOTS!!
ReplyDeleteOh Christ, don't get Jesus involved in this
DeleteNobody said this proves the existence of bigfoot. Go home troll
Deleteoh hey, its the wake up guy! thanks wake up guy.
DeleteI don't want to wake up its my nappy time
Deletei think the squatches were waiting for smeja to step away from the camp. missing 411, vol. iv.......
ReplyDeleteYes, I heard Smeja wasnt wearing his pull ups before he fell asleep by the campfire. Ro was gonna have to wake him up to tinkle in the woods or he wold wet the cot. Those Samsquanches were waiting for him in the bushes.
DeleteI think they were as well.
DeleteI like this blog and appreciate the effort put forth here. I honestly do. But other than a supposed 7+ foot tall blob, you got nothing. I still liked it, if it's any consolation.
ReplyDeleteWell that was most disappointing, unbelievable and time wasting. And for some reason they didn't walk forward towards these subjects over such easy ground? Didn't radio back to camp in an attempt to have Justin get up and push the subjects out of the bush towards them or out into the open?
ReplyDeleteI saw a bootleg version a few months back, I thought it was awesome for what it was, especially the investigation and all they included if I ever get through it. Everything in their link is exactly what Bart and Lieterman told me it was going to be.
Deletedid you even read the reports as I think your question is answered in there pretty clearly.
Mr. Dingbat won't bother reading the full report. His obvious ignorance toward this subject had his mind made up before he watched the video.
DeleteWarren, Not sure if you even finished the video, but if you had you would understand a lot of the things you seem to be questioning. If you had read the PDFs which we all know you didnt do because that would require real reading and work, this was unexpected, they caught what they caught on camera late at night. They got some footage and went back to camp to evaluate it.
DeleteIm sure had you been out there Mr Dingman, you would have done a much better job than them! Thanks!
I watched the raw video and the breakdown video in full. There is nothing remarkable in the footage - lacks detail and definition. They also fail to make any effort to move closer or take advantage of the situation. They believed they had bigfoots in front of them and do nothing but take blurry pictures. There is nothing remarkable here. They didn't take the initiative. This is another blobsquatch and fail.
DeleteYou keep saying remarkable, like your nitpicking Shawns article or something Im not sure. But if thats your issue, is Shawn's description of the event than you should soon realize shawn is not the best "journalist"
DeleteThey dont move closer, but the figures they saw were over 100ft away, not just steps away like you make it seem. One of the two witnesses said he wasnt sure if he was really seeing anything until they looked at the footage after. They didnt take "blurry pictures" they were using a thermal video camera zoomed at a distance where it will show nothing definitive.
Actually Dingdong is wrong, in Bart's question answer report he goes into great detail about trying different angles to get them.
DeleteDid you even read the reports the guys had where they talk about all this stuff? did you see how many independent investigators worked on this?
I think this falls short on proving bigfoots of course but it appears it's exactly as advertised and I've never seen researchers pack this much detail and analysis into something. I wish more would do this kind of stuff and then there's idiots like Dingdick who criticizes the guys finally doing it right.
Theres really nothing you can say to knock the work these guys did Dingdong. It was never to prove anything specifically, it was to establish that they saw something bipedal, larger than a human, and saw multiple. All the infomation collected is remarkable. Actually READ it now then post how you feel Dingleberry
DeleteAt least I'm man enough and mature enough to post under my name and not hide Anons r Us. I heard better name calling when I was ten. And again - unremarkable and disappointing, and I believe the darn Bigfoots exist. But this proves nothing - he most likely took video of the campsite which he admits was on the other side of the trees.
DeleteSeriously? Nobody is saying to you that this video proves the existence of bigfoot. If you believe in it, you sure dont act like someone who is open to the idea. I would have responded to your comments but everyone else said it right. You have missed a lot of the information while watching these videos, and obviously are not looking too into the reports to prove/disprove the event(not the species, stop making that the case)
DeleteThis isnt about the existence of a bigfoot, its about whether or not this footage is authentic, which it has been proven to be. Whether you think its a sasquatch or not is your opinion and your entitled to it, but to call all this hard work disapointing and a waste of time is wrong. There is a TON of hard work poured into this over the course of idk how many months. Read and pay attention when you evaluate this stuff. There is no reason for this to have been a hoax and if it were it would be proven by now by all of the outside investigation. The people bashing you may be doing it in a mean spirit but its in response to yours im sure. I have no reason to call you names, but your sure not looking at any of this with an open mind like you say you have.
I wish Bobo was here. He'd know, huh?
DeleteSeriouly - yes. Oh, read and pay attention like every one did with the Ketchum study before they trashed it to death. Watch the video - as others have said it as well - there's nothing here. I didn't call it a hoax and I watch and read all presented with an open mind. Skeptics seize on this so-called evidence, show it to the world and make Bigfooters look foolish. And it's their own fault.
DeleteI have not done any field work myself, but IMO this is how true sasquatch research should be done.
DeletePlease do not take this the wrong way Mr. Dingman, but have you worked in the field very much? Do you have a better way of going about this type of research?
Also, would you really have approached the figures on Bart's thermal without knowing what was there for certain?
this is a great post really. there should be more like it. good job! now let's see if we can get some sasquatches with hula hoops videos. our skeptic friends derserve nothing less.
Deleteaha, Warren is a kecthumite that's why he doesn't like Bart. because him and TYler warned us about everything that was going to happen and did with her.
DeleteNo way you read or watched all that Mr Dingman, you should be ashamed for bashing good researchers who do things the right way. I know it's not saying much but Cutino is my bfooter of the year and possibly ever after this and the ketchum dna debacle.there's at least one footer to trust
First let's address the idea of research - research what? No one can prove that bigfoot exists and the mainsteam scientists state it doesn't exist and cannot. Real scientists with training and degrees - Jeff Meldrum has done excellent work and is the only one with proper credentials to do research.
DeleteSecond - I've watched the videos and breakdowns and I'm unimpressed to say the least. The video evidence must stand alone and it can't. Thats why they felt it necessary to provide so much follow-up evidence and "research" to back up their video.
Third - I live on Vancouver Island and I hunt on Vancouver Island. I do so alone and at times in thick rainforest. I've seen footprints in the snow and I know other hunters who've seen many footprints. We've never seen the beast though.
JC - would I walk towards the unknown subject to determine what they or it really is? Absolutely - why be presented with such an opportunity and just stand on the road. I've met no evil in the deep dark forest and I'm not afraid of monsters.
Too much reading
DeleteDingman - Clearly, you don't know much about this field of research. Within moments of these guys starting to walk toward the alleged Sasquatch, the Sasquatch would have immediately left the scene. So their choice was to either stay put and hope the Sasquatch came out in the open ... or run them off.
DeleteThere are butt-hurt dullards from the Ketchum fan club that have been lying in wait to trash this. They may be ignored.
DeleteField of research? Field of research of what? Accredited by whom? Don't attribute characteristics or knowledge or powers to what is still just the magic monkey. The mythical monkey. The monkey all of these "researchers" can't find and therefore can't prove exists. It's not a field of research - it's a glorified dungeons n dragons game being led by man-children. If Smeja says he killed two then let him loose to kill another but this time show the world a body.
Deleteeasy point of view for you, mr. dingman, very safe and comfortable. makes me wonder if you would indeed walk toward the unknown "monster". remember the accredited world of science refused to accept the existence of the mountain gorilla, the platypus, the giant squid, and who knows what other creatures a days worth of science history research can produce. accredited doesn't mean shit. once the existence of sasquatch is truly known, then suddenly there will be "accredited" people in every school. until then the process we have is the one we've got. these guys were in the field and they were researching, there you have it, what else could it be. for better or for worse the above is what they got on that particular night. personally, i think it's for the better.
DeleteAs someone said earlier in the posts - Got Monkey?
DeleteCheck out his question and answer report dingdick you mght learn something. I've been out with Bart, know how he thinks and the guy is fearless.
DeleteDo yourslef a favor and read it you lazy ass.
If you have been out with Bart on his "research" why are you posting anonymously? Please provide real facts and evidence and not insults. And learn to spell.
DeleteWell dent puller I absolutely agreed with you right up till the point you started talking shit but these guys have a point also. no one is saying this is unquestionable proof just they caught something interesting. I'll give them credit for that they did catch something interesting nothing more nothing less. So that should be enough said because both of you guys are arguing with each other over different facts that you guys are in agreement on and that is this is not proof of Bigfoot and you're neglecting to acknowledge that the evidence is good even though it's not proving the existence of Bigfoot.
DeleteNice job. This was great example of scientific inquiry and teamwork. Cheers to the drooling simpletons who mindlessly mash their keypads every time a new post is made here, without weighing any evidence or coming up with any valid arguments to support their statements. Keep on firsting fellas.
ReplyDeleteIf you think the scientfic method, or critical thinking, apply to bigfootery I suggest you direct your tongue to Bill Munns' anus and ideology. Roger and Bob had fun that day. They made some money off a lie. What could be more American?
DeleteIs your litany of lies here today at 6:04 American?
DeleteVery well said
ReplyDeleteAfter viewing the video, I have no way of telling for sure that these are or are not sasquatches, but these are definitely sasquatches
ReplyDeleteSi el bigfoot es muy real. el existe y le gusta comer venado..
ReplyDeleteparlez vous francais?
DeleteWhats a good derogatory name for a frenchie?
DeleteFrenchie Le Taterhole.
DeleteComment cava le Quebecois bigfooters.
Deletefrog. they hate that name. yep, frog.
DeleteThere is zero reason to believe that these are sasquatches in this thermal footage and not humans.
ReplyDeleteThe witness sighting is what this is based on, if you cant believe the witnesses then you wont believe what could be in the footage. Obviously you were expecting some clear image of a sasquatch taking a dump. Sorry to disappoint you.
DeleteI disagree 6:46 and I'm the last person to run around saying it but I'm reading through their reports and am very impressed with their investigation. The only other option I see is people and they cover that very well.
DeleteI think they may've actually got bigfoots here as the scale is impressive to me, not sure what you're looking at
Looks like many are not even looking at the material these guys provided. I'm much more impressed with it now than when I first saw it this afternoon and I'm about 20% into all the material they provided
Good job Mr Cutino
Amen anon 7:22 I agree the amount of work that they put into this is incredible and for such a small incident it makes it very impactful as an event.
DeleteMan, some these people posting are just thick. This video makes no claim to prove anything other than present a bunch of evidence that surround possible witnessed sightings by two people together who filmed this. It is a GREAT example of people bringing professionalism and scientific approaches to a bigfooting expedition. Gotta love all the hate, but there is nothing to hate on really. It is just a thermal video to go along with the witness' account. If you cant handle that then your on the wrong website
ReplyDeleteHere it is ladies and gentlemen, the thermal footage of multiple sasquatches taken in the Sierras last August.
DeleteSo they;re just claiming they're squatches with no proof?
Pretty stupid.
They are claiming it based on the evidence in front of them. Multiple bipedal and dark sillouttes seen by two different people's eyes. Also recorded on thermal footage is images of movement of bipedal something, all one color and temperature throughout. They used the information they collected to determine that the only thing it could have been. Could it have been someone out in the woods with others stealthily walking around without light or equipment, sure. But what are the odds of people doing that for no reason at all? What would be the point of them hoaxing this, they are not out selling this information. Its free for you to read and watch(Im sure you only did the latter)
Deletethey determined they are sasquatches, it is not "proof" it is possible evidence of multiple bigfoots and the story in detail and breakdowns by them and others including recreations.
Its more stupid to post hate on a bigfoot blog under an anonymous name cause your scared of being identified by strangers as whatever name you choose. That is stupid.
Dude did they say they had proof? They said THERMAL FOOTAGE PACKAGE, which has lots of possible evidence for the sighting they had. Actually look at the material ANON, die in a fire you dumb troll.
Deletethanks, chuck. i agree whole heartedly, no one who put the video up said "o.k. folks, there you have it!". it's part of an on going process and those guys are out in the field for chrissakes! they are encountering beings that have the human camper figured out. the sasquatch know we don't belong in the forests; we're clumsy and inept. they have the advantage and when proof is given to humanity of their absolute existance, it may be of their choice.
Delete^ existence ^
DeleteDon't worry about the trolls Charles Bronson. Most of them will not even bother watching or reading the full report.
DeleteThis one video on BFE is all they need to make up their (already made up) minds.
If you want an intelligent debate go to BFF.
Everyone there is pretty level headed concerning sasquatch.
yes, you don't see a lot of telling people to die, calling people homosexual, or general arrested development type stuff at some of the other sites.
DeleteToo much reading
DeleteHoax it, film it, break it down, blog about it, and repeat.
ReplyDeleteBigfooting for dollars 101
Phil is pretty far from a hoaxer, talk out your ass some more.
DeleteOh shit Anon 6:54 must be an EXPERT! WOW TEACH US MORE OH WISE ONE!
DeleteWhat you say doesnt make any sense, Parabreakdown is well known to be a skeptic in general, why would he believe this?
Because he's a team player
DeleteToo bad that isnt his "team" doing the filming...
Deleteyour argument is invalid. Die in a fire.
to anon 6:54 I suggest listening to the audio and reading the reports I can't say what they filmed (I'm perplexed)but there's absolutely no way this is a hoax. Can only be misidentification but not sure what? people? they sure as hell don't look it to me and those are mighty tall people
DeleteReally? You actually believe that there is no way that this could be a hoax?
DeleteIt's easier to hoax bigfoot with thermal imaging than with a regular camera and a costume.
I didn't realize the case for Bigfoot was this compelling.
ReplyDeleteDIE IN A FIRE
Deleteplease
I didn't realize your reply to my post would be so compelling.
Deletefor god's sakes, 7:12, will you stop telling people to die. what the hell is wrong with you?
DeleteHe presented this at the BF Discovery Days. He also said that the camera was pointed back at the campsite. Although he stated that it was impossible to see the campsite. Looks like something shining off of that black log rather than a body.
ReplyDeleteYea cause there all those SHINY THINGS ON TREES IN THE FOREST
DeleteAre you fucking dumb?!?
I heard about the footage/info this is the first I have seen of it. Looks like good footage, I think they would know if they were accidentally filming the camp, because they charted everything out on a map to see where everything was in relation to their location. Look at the pdf's and entire video theres a lot of good information in there.
DeleteThere sure is Charles as they go through this in depth and even more in depth. I'm really into this video as there's no way those are people as they outline quite nicely and they've even documented that the tallest guy in there group is at least a half foot shorter then the smallest biped. Plus look at the way they move as it's pretty epic when you watch this close. I think they are legit and these guys proved it yet the video isn't could enough.
Deletealso couldn't help but notice the researchers there in the Ranger, John Freitas, Phil P...very impressive work Bart Cutino
Watch "continuous action" at 1:12 to 1:40 and onward. Tell me why only that black stump gets highlighted...
DeleteI met and believe Justin at the BF Days - a likable stand up guy. I understand Bart to be equally a stand up guy. I listened closely and watched the map of the area. But the video was pretty weak in my eyes. He ensured us that he was well away from the campsite but pointed at it. When I first saw it I wondered about the pin-hole camera effect. Just didn't see much here.
DeleteANON 821 what in god's name are you talking about??? that's not a tree stump its a gap in the trees and these things are walking back and forth through it. I don't even own a thermal and I know this not to mention they go through all of this in their reports.it's obviously pointed there because that's where they were seen and that's where the movement was. I sure wouldnt have pointed it anywhere else ha ha.
DeleteI feel bad that Bart has so many dumbshits to deal with I hope he's prepared to deal with people that don't read
Yeah maybe they're shape shifting in that gap. You're seeing what you want to see.
Delete(clive squashy)
ReplyDeleteA most stellar performance...er, investigation.
"hey STELLLLA" !
There is nothing mindblowing about thermal images. They only use them because they are easy to fake and you don't even need a costume. The idea that this ever elusive bigfoot only comes out at night has been foisted upon us to to bolster the idea that thermal imaging is the only answer. How many of these dweebs are claiming habituation sites without ANY physical evidence or even a clear picture? Stop feeding their egos and pocketbooks and tell them to go piss up a rope!
ReplyDeleteWell there's another idiot who didn't look at the work these researchers did. check it out you may learn something
Delete8:17 I'm fairly certain bigfoots don't exist, and positive almost everything claimed as evidence is an anecdote or garbage. I have to be fair though and say Bart Cutino is not a hoaxer. Some of these guys are honest....
DeleteFake and Gay.
ReplyDeleteNeed a size comparison to a six foot human.The heads in the thermal look human so does the size,shape, so who says this is proof.Bring in Bobo I bet hes bigger than these guys.
ReplyDeleteclick over to the other site and you'll see all of the comparison work that was done.
DeleteDude there's re-creations through like every footage of KIp morrill who's 6'3 according to their report. they did all this, it's all there
DeleteHey didn't Robert Lindsay report on this story like, months ago?
ReplyDeleteBetter give him credit Shawn before he starts whining about it!
There is nothing there. More fake bigfoot crap
ReplyDeletesuck a dick, choke and die
DeleteJust awesome work guys!
ReplyDeleteBart I think you really nailed 'them' and this investigation....ggood job man!
it isn't mind blowing because you really can't tell what the figures are. They could be what they claim but unless it was closer and better it just doesn't pass the test .
ReplyDeleteThis was really, really cool and just what the bfoot community needed from a investigation standpoint.
ReplyDeleteThe figures appear to be either bigfoots or humans, no doubt about that however I'm with them as thy aren't humans based on their findings at this site. I sincerely doubt 3 people that tall would be there in the middle of the night. No way this is a hoax either as how would they have done it base on what we see and hear.
crazy part is how close this was to the 'kills". I'm actually reevaluating smeja's story because of this, I'm impressed what I see and how could it be this close.
Point the thermal camera at the campsite where you know there are humans.
ReplyDeleteGet human shaped subjects on the thermal.
Assume they are bigfoots.
Facepalm.
Exactly.
DeleteActually did you look a any of their work? the camera wasn't pointed at the fire and the guys couldn't been filmed below.
DeleteNice try/faceplant
Great work Bart and crew!
^what so therefore you are going to jump to the conclusion that its an undiscovered magic monkey man?
DeleteYou guys should pay attention to there reenactments as those are either humans or bigfoots, those are no other animals and anyone who says so needs glasses. I agree with them that these cant be humans with circumstances and heights. I'll eat crow if three to four people come out and prove they hoaxed them that are those heights.
Deletegood work guys
Ambiguousfoot
ReplyDeleteLooks like jref win again
DeleteNo body, No bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteAny bones even would be nice. Thats how my teacher said dinosaurs were proved and why science calls bigfoot a indian myth. They are a kind of spirit animal keeper of the forest.
ReplyDeleteExcellent stuff Bart and the rest! The way bigfooting should be done. We'd be a lot closer to the truth if this approach was carried out by everyone.
ReplyDeleteIf only you had some proof that the guys were in the camp at the time of the footage being taken...
You seem to be implying that the truth is "bigfoot is real". A common mistake among footers who think there is an end goal that will be reached that will be proof of existence.
DeleteA realistic and sensible view is that bigfoot doesn't exist and this changes nothing.
as a skeptic who finds this subject fascinating, this is why I'm ultra impressed at the work these guys did as I was initially very unimpressed with the footage itself. but after reading through their work and the approach to "destroy" it which they've proven if you watch reenactment stuff, I give these guys a top grade for their work. so far I haven't seen what they claim is pretty well backed up it's just too bad for them the footage couldn't have been better or closer.
Delete