The Jacobs Bigfoot Creature Was Mentioned on Finding Bigfoot


Finding Bigfoot's investigation in Pennsylvania brought up the Jacobs creature. For those not familiar with the photographs -- in 2007 a media flurry ensued when Pennsylvania hunter Rick Jacobs released some trail cam photographs of what some enthusiasts claim to be a sasquatch. Jacobs obtained the photo by affixing a camera with an automatic trigger to a tree in the Allegheny National Forest. When he saw the photo, he contacted the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization. According to BFRO president Matt Moneymaker, the creature in the photographs depict a juvenile sasquatch.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. rusherlife was in the movie Step brothers Will Ferrell rubbed his balls all over his drum kit

      Delete
    2. Rush was a Top 3 band most loved by gay boys during a vote back in 2003 on a VH1 show. Fact.

      Delete
    3. Rush rules if you like anti-religion atheistic lyrics. Because that's what you get with their last few albums.

      Bigfoot don't like Rush music.

      Delete
  2. That's just Dick Ryders assumed position

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why ar do comendoes on de srite so tormiba?

    ReplyDelete
  4. ...i'm gonna go ahead and claim it cos ^ idiot didn't so technically FIRST!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. For years I thought these were possibly genuine.
    However, various analysis done by a variety of researchers/skeptics have changed my mind.
    They are ruining everything for me in the last little while. My overall belief is dwindling away. Please make it stop....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was very intrigued in the Jacob pics too. Shawn posted a video clip on here with a mangy bear from Florida that really looked almost exactly like the Jacob pics. There is still a slight possiblity in my mind that the Jacob pics could be a little bigfoot based off a few analysises I have seen, but not much of one.

      As for the rest, I always take "evidence" with a grain of salt. Most is pure junk. But I still firmly think it is possible we have bigfoot running around. It will just take a body to prove it. This fiasco of dna testing has proved that much. Even if the data is held up by science there has been so much smearing done by everyone most of the public won't accept it.

      Delete
    2. I was very intrigued in the Jacob pics too. Shawn posted a video clip on here with a mangy bear from Florida that really looked almost exactly like the Jacob pics. There is still a slight possiblity in my mind that the Jacob pics could be a little bigfoot based off a few analysises I have seen, but not much of one.

      As for the rest, I always take "evidence" with a grain of salt. Most is pure junk. But I still firmly think it is possible we have bigfoot running around. It will just take a body to prove it. This fiasco of dna testing has proved that much. Even if the data is held up by science there has been so much smearing done by everyone most of the public won't accept it.

      Delete
    3. Me too 9:04. Seems like theres more hoaxes than any thing. Still have tons of believable accounts. what about the spanish fork trackway? Looks very squatchy to me.

      Delete
    4. Big Fat Gay Jim,

      You fat pile of dung! Want to fight? Why don't you take your Fatty Aebuckle face and stick it up Robert Lindsay's ass and fight for gay air!!!


      There's Bigfoot Evidences little Ketchumite, here as usual crying and whining about how your queen's bunk paper receives ridicule (and right lay so). That's how science works fat body.


      Now back to massaging your queens wrinkled old ass and rubbing her corn ridden feet.

      Delete
    5. He couldn't see from the non-academic atmosphere, lies, retarded antics, and facts that the probability the paper was going to be bunk was very,very high. Facts? She never published before, no one ever discovered a species by dna alone..ugh..why bother? Some people have to play the role of sucker. Otherwise there would be no con artists like Ketchum...

      Delete
  6. No one cares about the one killed on the Navajo reservation?
    Just 2 days ago. Fed's took the body. They're barely letting ppl go to their houses
    Black rock, az.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...That was a dream...you can wake up now

      Delete
    2. MM already spoke with the chief of police on the Navajo reservation about this lame bogus rumor.

      Navajo police chief confirms - It's a lame bogus rumor.

      Delete
  7. Ah yes another mention of the Jacobs bear cub.

    How anyone could think this is a Juvie squatch, who just so happens to be hanging with bear cub friends is completely beyond me.

    Mother bears are so very protective of their cubs, there is no way in hell a Juvie squatch would survive a play date with bear cubs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are pictures on the net of mangy cubs in various poses. It IS a bear and the photos will forever be just something for us to discuss-in other words, no one outside the community even thinks about them....

      Delete
    2. Once you see the bear face looking at you in that pic, you can't unsee it!

      Delete
    3. Bear cub it ain't, sure some are there but that figure's no bear no matter how long the haters scream it to themselves nobody else is listening after all because we all know we see a young squatch.

      Delete
    4. There are other phots taken by this guys trail cam which clearly show its a bear cub. This is old crap, long ago found to be a bear cub. Just because FB/FB (Rick Dyer lovers) say its a BF don't mean squat... this completely proves how stupid some moron spastic ass people are!!

      Delete
  8. My relatives work in ER as a traveling nurse and Forest Service. Everyone got blacklisted in that area. Forestry and medical. There's more to it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken: yes I heard that there is a lot to the story, still some people there are talking about it years later. It's not a bear, and looks like a chimp from those pics, on these two points I find something to completely agree with game officers about, WOW I said it, I agree with game officers about something. That's a real miracle for me, I guess Bigfoot is possible.

      Delete
    2. Hey did you hear about the interview with that zoologist when these pictures first broke? He claimed to be 95% sure that the animal in the pictures was that of a male Chimpanzee. The guy was on for several days and several local stations there, just saying.

      Delete
    3. Where's the like button for that one ^

      Delete
    4. Zoologists and game wardens can be idiots too. Bigfoot is a fucking joke for idiots and children, where do all of you BLEEVERS FIT?

      Delete
    5. JUST SAYING, IGNORANT ASSWIPES.

      Delete
    6. @ 10:13
      Are you pretending not to bleeve because your family thinks you're an idiot for being obsessed with a mythical creature ?

      Delete
    7. I'M a BLEEVER IN YOUR BITING MY ASS ANON 10:52 IDIOT

      Delete
    8. KEN: He got his lil feelings hurt cause that old mean Money Maker didn't say hello to him or read his lil letter on the TV, We are all sorry and we'll be upset with him too lil buddy, ok? Now you stop calling the police station, and stop being so nasty to people you don't know anymore, your going to keep on until you get your lil ass paddled. Be a good boy and go to bed now and dream of your lil ass clowns.Goodnight keep quiet and maybe no LEAD BUGS will bite, FREAK.

      Delete
    9. Ken, there are pics on the net of a cub in the in the same pose as the one in the still on the video embed. I have NOT seen a match to the photo at the top of Shawn's post, though. However, when you put it all together that one must be a bear too: shot after shot of bears and suddenly, a baby enters the frame...No dice, man...

      Delete
    10. Ken: I haven't seen the cup pic you refer to, but I understand your logic. I do believe your right in most cases (Sow's with cubs) but Around feeders and bait, they seem to get more acclimated to being with other animals. I have a pic of cubs with 5 or more racoon's around a feeder of mine. but the real prob I have is with the way the animal looks in general. but I'm no expert on apes or pictures of anything, I do know a little about bears. Thanks for good point anon5:38

      Delete
    11. You are welcome. One must eliminate the mundane and probable, and that simply cannot be done here: all but a single photo can be matched to photos where the subject is identified as a bear. Coupling that with the fact that there is no other evidence of baby bigfoots living in that area makes it very,very likely ALL the Jacobs photos are bears. Thanks for your response...

      Delete
    12. Except these aren't. Man, I love the widespread denial in the science community they simply will not touch this subject for fear of being proven wrong, happened to Ketchum too. And of course having been instructed to say certain things by the Government's cover-up program in mainstream science.

      Delete
    13. One of the things that nags at me about these photos is that there is almost a half hour between when the cubs were at the tree and when the "creature" shows up. That is a lot of time in the woods. The time stamp on the cubs is 20:04 and on the creature it is 20:32. 28 minutes in between. I have not seen any other photos of the cubs later than that time. If anyone has a link to some share it please.

      Delete
    14. Big Fat Gay Jim,

      You fat pile of dung! Want to fight? Why don't you take your Fatty Arbuckle face and stick it up Robert Lindsay's ass and fight for gay air!!!


      There's Bigfoot Evidences little Ketchumite, here as usual crying and whining about how your queen's bunk paper receives ridicule (and rightly so). That's how science works fat body.


      Now back to massaging your queens wrinkled old ass and rubbing her corn ridden feet.

      Delete
  9. I simply could not depŠ°rt your web site prior tŠ¾ suggŠµsting that I Š³eally loveŌ the standŠ°rd
    іnfo a pŠµrson supрly in yĪæur
    visitoŠ³s? Is gĪænna be again incessŠ°ntly іn order to check up on neĻ‰ posts

    my webpage - plumbing companies

    ReplyDelete
  10. the must be desperate on this 2nd rate programme. using stock footage thats doe the rounds for years.

    why only i photo [agin and only of its bck]. surely the law of averages would give us the frnt two or a series of photos. as you get with bears/deer etc...

    Its the same 2 bears taken at a weird angle.

    why not show us as the walk up to the tree/walk away? they dont as it w=ould show a bear or man in suit

    same with Hovey still,a cropped trail cam pho.its all 1 big hoax

    ReplyDelete
  11. the word sasquatch was mentioned on finding bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
  12. a chimp skeleton overlaid on the creature matches almost perfectly...proprtions and joints. Black bear skeleton overlaid on it does not match.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it does, that's a damn lie. Have you EVER seen a pic of a bear with mange?

      http://www.google.com/search?q=bear+with+mange&hl=en&safe=off&client=tablet-android-asus-nexus&rlz=1Y3NDUG_enUS516US517&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=2iA1UbinJY6w8AT8i4HwBg&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=600&bih=904#biv=i%7C3%3Bd%7C_eYU6rpKmQjLTM%3A

      Delete
    2. Just Google "bear with mange" and click on images. There's even an overlay with a black bear skeleton.

      Delete
  13. Replies
    1. ^ Denial in a bigfoot thread, oh what a surprise.

      Delete
  14. Back shots, of course. We will NEVER get an unambiguous photo or vid. I have not only accepted that, I am starting to like it..lol...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Be ready to see more of nothing, and you'll like it.

      Delete
  15. It's called bigfoot because the feet resemble large human feet. Look at the feet on the Jacobs creature. They are not bigfoot feet.

    It's called bigfoot, not bearfoot. Case closed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. bears displaced from the fies at the time. where is the sries of photos. Th trail cam only took 1 then it froze?!!! utter nonsense. its 2 bears and a weird angle.Its nonsense like this that gives footery no credibility so when people do see something of interest and are credible,they say nothing,as pics like these r being pushed as bigfoots

    ReplyDelete
  17. no one knows so its mute. Next...

    ReplyDelete
  18. FACT: Bigfoots do not hang with bears. There are two bears in them photos and exactly zero squatch's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Likes to fantazise in Bigfoot threads.

      Delete
  19. These images are a great example of bigfooters making whatever they can into a bigfoot. The pros all know its a bear, but they still promote this crap.

    This is why bigfootery will always be a sham. There is no real bigfoot to photo, so you must take everything that could be mistaken for one, and promote the hell out of it, cherry picking everything you can to support it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These images are a great example of skeptards making whatever they can into a bear. The pros all know its a bigfoot, but they still promote this crap.

      This is why skeptardism will always be a sham. There are real bigfoots to photo, so you must take everything bear that could be mistaken for one, and promote the hell out of it, cherry picking everything you can to support it.

      Delete
    2. Hi DWA, hows your delusion treating you today?

      :D

      Delete
    3. 8:41 seems to have lost his medication.

      Delete
  20. CAUTION the guy that got banned from JREF is here. Identified in posts 8.41, 8.39, 8.38, 8.37, 8.35, and 8.31.

    CAUTION bleeves in a magic forest man. Men in white coats will be along shortly please keep your distance.

    ReplyDelete
  21. His favorite words are: Skeptard, Moron, and Idiot. Someone please call the Looney Farm, he's managed to remove his straitjacket.

    ReplyDelete
  22. There ain't no bears in there
    Not a single bear in there

    ReplyDelete
  23. I am not positive the place you're getting your info, but good topic. I must spend a while learning much more or understanding more. Thank you for fantastic info I was searching for this information for my mission.

    Also visit my web site: microsoft registry cleaner

    ReplyDelete
  24. I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you make this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you?
    Plz answer back as I'm looking to construct my own blog and would like to know where u got this from. thanks

    my blog :: Recommended Site

    ReplyDelete
  25. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .
    net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of
    the expenses. But he's tryiong none the less. I've been using Movable-type on
    a number of websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to
    another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.

    net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    my website ... http://autodeskmakedonija.com/index.php?option=com_blog&view=comments&pid=45208&Itemid=50

    ReplyDelete
  26. Saved as a favorite, I really like your blog!

    Feel free to visit my homepage ... additional info

    ReplyDelete
  27. This one was real because Bushnell the makers of the game camera that took these pictures tested those images for photoshopping. There was no Photoshopping and they had experts that couldn't explain what it was on the film.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think it was Bigfoot, I mean why not if it looks like one and if they are real, why not?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story