Here's The Difference Between Field Research And Squatchin'

By -

In this video David Batdorf gives his opinion on the difference between ACTUAL field research and the typical "Sasquatch Researcher". He writes: "I know there are some out there who may already be taking a serious/professional approach to surveying and cataloging an area... but this is not the common practice in this field." Watch the video to see what he means by this:

Comments

  1. rushferlifeSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:01:00 PM PDT

    1

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:03:00 PM PDT

    MMC
    2

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:05:00 PM PDT

    both result in ZERO evidence so there is no difference.

    mythical creature folks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Professional Sasquatch ResearcherSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 8:31:00 PM PDT

      Bigfoot field research will offer you nothing and you'll like it.

      Delete
  4. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:07:00 PM PDT

    This guy seems to make a lot of sense until you realize he's talking about finding an 8ft 600lb magic monkey.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:07:00 PM PDT

    I gave up on research and just squatch now. It's more fun and no one expects anything of me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:12:00 PM PDT

      Me too. I take my iPhone and some food and refreshments, snacks and weed and its off on another adventure in the middle of nowheresville

      Delete
    2. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:23:00 PM PDT

      And exactly what, pray tell, did this 'research' consist of? Howls, knocks, or herding stupid canines to the vicinity of power lines?

      Delete
    3. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 8:21:00 PM PDT

      The research consisted in demonstrating plenty of nothing and you liked it.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousSunday, March 17, 2013 at 2:11:00 AM PDT

      YES I DID. !!!!!

      Delete
  6. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:25:00 PM PDT

    And what exactly are we supposed to do with a stack of notebooks, filled with field notes? Make a campfire out of them? Write another book that no one wants to pay for? I can't make a DVD out of them because who wants to watch a DVD where some researcher pages through his field notes. The BFRO isn't interested either, because there is nothing in it for them. Inquiring minds want to know.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 6:40:00 PM PDT

    You can do all the field research you want but in the end it wont matter until some stupid redneck shoots one and has the body on display, THEN your research may be deemed valuable. Its unfortunate, but true.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousSaturday, March 16, 2013 at 11:43:00 PM PDT

    Researchers are well-intentioned but they're never going to prove anything.
    Squatchers are hobbyists, like birders. They're harmless.
    Its the Bigfoot hunters who are putting in the real effort to establish the existence of Bigfoot. If anyone ever does prove it, it'll most probably be one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousSunday, March 17, 2013 at 7:06:00 AM PDT

    I watched an episode of Finding Bigfoot once. Now I'm a expert bigfoot researcher.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousSunday, March 17, 2013 at 8:27:00 AM PDT

    Nice video. To me, it's like drivers coming up on a scene of an accident once they get through the traffic jam - Researchers are the type who don't pause because they know their tap of the brakes will cause further delays a mile back. Squatchers rubberneck because it's all about them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousSunday, March 17, 2013 at 10:59:00 AM PDT

    If science would just do it's job and stroke my ego....

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

By -
Image
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure. 
Read more

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

By -
Image
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Read more

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

By -
Image
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Read more