Michael Merchant: Steve Kulls nails "Ketchum Christ" to the Cross!


In this video Michael Merchants talks about Steve Kulls' latest post on the Ketchum debacle. Since the release of the Ketchum Bigfoot DNA paper, it's safe to say that Kulls is no longer a supporter. He writes in his blog: "Make no mistake, it has failed, as it missed the mark in being published in an established scientific journal with peer review with some degree of scientific acceptance."

Watch Michael's video below. Don't forget to also check out the blog post by Steve Kulls, Ketchum Paper Released: Unfortunately there’s some problems.

Comments

  1. I would never watch a merchant video. That loser is using Melbas beautiful face to try and get views. He is a dueche

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know I watched all but one Merchant video, and couldn't watch it all. He just screams "look at me' and the overbearing sarcasm is too much. Then again, I've watched three Fasano vids! (shows what I know...)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shawn I'm pretty sure the majority of your readers dislike M.M. judging by recent comments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes but they're in bed together BE and TT, a naughty ploy with endless smear against Ketchum for the simple fact they were likely both formed with that one purpose in mind to discredit and ridicule this study they knew would be coming. Same old authority tactic of attacking the messenger or witness. Basically, you'll find more pro-Bigfoot talk if you visit the Vatican than you'll ever get here.

      Delete
  4. Here is a quick recap for those that don't care to watch.

    blah blahblah blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah. Blah blah blah blah blah. Blah bla blah blah blah. And thats about it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ask yourself this: What has Kulls ever done that is credible?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He turned an owl into a Sasquatch.

      Delete

    2. He turned me into a frog...but I got better though.

      Delete
  6. Imagine the field day that a doppelganger of Michael Merchant would have, making a "mock" video about the whole Smeja steak, sierra shooting, Ro Sahebi documentary, lie-detector test,Olinselot sighting, etc., all rolled into one?

    ReplyDelete
  7. He makes some good points actually.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Didn't Merchant get caught banging horses ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The man loves animals. Let him have his fun.

      Delete
    2. Superior , Wi has a horse / Deer banger!

      Delete
    3. Then it can't be all that superior now could it. Sorry bad joke I couldn't resist

      Delete

  9. Nothing new there then, thanks for the heads up.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tabloid Garbage. Include Kulls in it along with Merchant! This site is getting worse everyday! I almost wonder if this site is trying to cause trouble and make modern day witch hunts! This reminds me of Congress! We need to unite researchers not divide them! Of course they do that on their own, but this crap needs to STOP! Kulls, Merchant, Fasano, Lindsay, Nadia, Shawn, and you all know who ( others) - stop the friggen bickering and work together on species recognition! I do too much hard work in this Bigfoot field just to have you guys destroy it! It's tough enough with the trolls , but to battle egos and stubborn people is something else. The species is there and those who work in this field know it! So let's work together like reasonable adults. We can disagree on stuff, but the cut downs and accusations are doing us and the field absolutely nothing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On that note, might I suggest a temporary detour, gentlemen?

      For those who haven't read up on the European wodewose which was mentioned earlier on this lovely blog, there is some fascinating information here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wodewose

      Reports of hairy wildmen in Europe and even Scotland persisted in mediaeval times. The Scottish stories go back to at least the 13th century (1200s AD), and continue with the Big Grey Man.

      There is some great material there for those interested in our friend the Yeti.

      Now, back to my vendange.

      Carry on, gentlemen; carry on.

      Delete

    2. Exactly when we stand together our best days are yet to come.
      Our proudest moments are yet to be.
      Our most glorious achievements are just ahead.

      Delete
    3. Sorry, I have no interest in the "Big Gay Man."

      Delete
    4. You apparently do freak because you took the time to come on this site and post! They should have an intelligence test for people to post on here!^

      Delete
    5. ^Okay, you got me -- I am attracted to big gay men. But that doesn't make me unqualified to discuss bigfoot!

      Delete
    6. Back to the original post... You want species recognition? You know what has to be done.
      Forget the hair and scat samples. Leave the plaster of Paris ay home. Stop sending money and meat to whackos and crackpot scientists. The days when shaky videos and plaster casts mattered are long over. Too many hoaxes under the bridge.
      Its time to put up or shut up. Its time to bring in the goods.

      Delete
    7. I bet Mike Rugg hates this annoying guy's guts.

      Delete
  11. The real researchers aren't the ones posting videos every other day running thier mouths, they are out in the woods right now. Sure post a video every now and then about what you saw. Not just to get your ugly hairy face on the Web

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its winter in the east,bigfoot is sleeping

      Delete
  12. Kids and parents beware!!this is what happens to children who read bigfoot blogs........they grow up to be people like Michael Merchant...beware!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. This is what Geneticists have said about the paper.

    Leonid Kruglyak, a Princeton University geneticist:

    “To state the obvious, no data or analyses are presented that in any way support the claim that their samples come from a new primate or human-primate hybrid. Instead, analyses either come back as 100% human, or fail in ways that suggest technical artifacts. They make the bizarre claim that the failures might be caused by novel, nonstandard structure of the DNA (“Electron micrographs of the DNA revealed unusual double strand – single strand – double strand transitions which may have contributed to the failure to amplify during PCR.”) which would mean this DNA was different from DNA in all other known species. There’s also the strange statement they couldn’t deposit sequences in GenBank because it’s a new/unknown taxon — GenBank does that no problem.”

    Todd Disotell, a human origins expert at New York University who has previously tested dozens of DNA samples from people claiming to have Bigfoot DNA.:

    “It’s clearly a fake Vanity Journal with lots of ShutterStock pictures, misspellings and it was only created on 2/4/13. I’ve only read the abstract and conclusion and neither makes any sense.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. What the hell, your a little late to the party arn't you that's been posted on several threads already here and it's even on Kulls page linked above, try to keep up !

      Delete
    2. Smelba got dominated by real/credible scientists, geneticists and anthropologists.

      Delete
  14. gum bumper prime, wooo hooo
    why not just waterboard us all ?

    ReplyDelete
  15. This guy doesn't contribute much other than ragging on others.
    What if Ketchum's hand picked reviewers of her data includes Sykes?
    I would not be surprised if that is the case. I just want to see the data, though I couldn't analyze it. So I should say I want to see what the rest of the genetics experts say about it. It seems to me (from the outside) that she had hairs that were clearly not human, or anything known, that had dna that has mtDNA that is human and nuDNA that is not. The more genetic analysts involved, the better. She would have been better off just self publishing, then letting the same thing happen, avoiding all the hoopla. The way I see it, she made the honest mistake that she could get a journal to publish, even if it passed peer review, which was not likely given the risk the journal would be taking. The main acceptance factor is getting the top experts in the field to go over the data and render their opinion. Doesn't matter how it gets done. General rule in life is "don't give people a stick to beat you over the head with". Now, the experts can render their opinion, acting as neutral players without risking their reputations. If the data is good, despite the mistakes in the presentation, we "footers" can finally look forward to finding out much more at a faster rate. We're all so curious about this "phenomenon" we're like kids in a candy store. It's the biggest mystery on the planet right now, and we're the species with the most curiosity. To me, it's simple: all those witnesses can't be lying. Forgive me skeptics for having so much curiosity. I forgive you for not wanting to "believe". We're all good people, it's a fun subject.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, if the data's good it should be enough. Of course many of those mainstream heads looking at it now will do their best to find faults with it though there aren't any, if you find faults we know you've been bought.

      Delete
    2. No if you fInd faults it's because they are faults and the science is not correct! Melba really has you drinking the Kool Aid doesn't she? Just because she's telling you all you want to hear about human Sasquatch, being persecuted by the big bad establishment and that she's some kind of martyr to the cause it doesn't mean it's true it just speaks to your own personal paranoia!

      Delete
  16. Jesus fuck has it come to this? Bigfoot Evidence used to mean a lot more than this.

    Let Freedom Reign.

    Long Live Mucklegrunt!!!
    Long Live Muskeytatersockpuppet!!!
    Long Live Poop In A Jar Guy!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, poop in a jar guy needs to go away, stay away, keep getting sensored. It's now an old, sad, crude, low class joke, comment. We don't need that here. Kids don't need to be exposed to the sexual neuroses of the sick bloggers. They of course think it's funny, but it is not, and it is idiocy.

      Delete
    2. A Osterman is all of the above and he pretends to be others supporting himself! He is 50 percent of the idiotic troll comments on this blog! FU you moron welfare idiot!

      Delete
    3. yep, poop in jar commentators need to do one. we have a situation wherby bigfoot will either be proven or seen as a joke. ketchum and the erickson films are either going to rock the world or dissapoint us all

      so stoned merchant and school boy commentators should really go on ebaumsworld or whatever zany site is cool these days and leave this alone

      Delete
    4. This is an anti-bf blog now, didn't you know. It started off as pretending to be true seekers talking about famous stories but that was just to throw you off, while waiting for this paper.

      Delete
  17. This Merchant guy is a old time Space Cadet, a burn out, a forgotten hippie lost in the 70s. go away you fool

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RIght, what does Merchant actually do in the bigfoot world other than comment on others?

      Delete
    2. Merchant is cool as beans.
      Go back to Jref and laugh at J.Randi.

      Delete
  18. I swear as god as my witness, if I ever see Michael Merchant in person i will knock him the fuck out!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No you won't. You're a typical footer douchebag who is full of shit.

      Furthermore, does his logical fact stating persona piss you off because you're a typical blind follower of the church of bigfoot?

      Delete
    2. That's a threat. Shaun, grab this persons IP and report them to the Police.

      Delete
    3. You can try ;p You'll have about as much luck as Ketchum getting her paper published.

      Delete
    4. Mark, not how the rest of us read it so buzz off with your eternally wanking snide comments they impress no one here and 10:37 must be some BE couch potato himself.

      Delete
    5. Ooooh,I'm gonna tell Shawn,leave the beating for Dyer,if you must strike someone,not that I endorse that

      Delete
  19. Whether you like his animated delivery or not, he is a voice of reason in a world of bigfoot insanity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Voice of reason , now thats funny right there !

      Delete
    2. You got it, about as obvious as a morning sunrise too.

      Delete
    3. By his own admission he has no understanding of DNA. He can't even pronounce it correctly, along with alot of other words. He just an attention seeking third grader.

      While I don't condone violence, it is easy to see on Micheals structural features ----- he has a glass jaw, he would be very, very easy to knock out.

      I'm sure he can't fight, those all mouth guys never can.

      Delete
    4. Did you get that Dyer invite you were crying for?

      Delete
    5. No Rum, of course not.

      No outsiders to see his little stuffed doll.

      Delete
  20. As for KULLS AND KETCHUP it takes a hoaxer to catch a hoaxer .

    That is all

    ReplyDelete
  21. Made the gross error of watching one Merchant vid. Never again.

    Never in the world of Bigfootery has anyone contributed less. As much as it pains me to say it but Dyer has actually more credibility than this joker.

    I know Shaun posts his stuff because we all line up to take this useless clown down and it's all about clicks right?

    One day Merchant will produce a vid that actually shows him doing something constructive in the field but hell no one would watch as he is soiled goods.

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
  22. erm,what do team tazer[approved,in big zany voice ovr]do for footery. all i se is this mouthppiee standing in the snpw with shades and a shirt!!! speking like an overgrown teenager dissing evrything bigfoot

    wha are his belives= lay itout! as ketchum had the guts too. do you believe there are thousnds of bigfoot in north america
    where is his evidence if he belives= thats right he doesnt have shit. a nobody, a loudmouth self appointed judge of evryone elses work. whether u are a scientist with a ph fookn d or a guy who took a film of 'something' interesting. we are all there to be judged by this overgrown teenaged acting prick

    cant they 'just do one' as he would no doubt say.either that or put up! oh thats right they have zip

    ReplyDelete
  23. i feel new spring in my step after reading te fact people re as sick of tis nobody as i always have been. he seemd to have support or he woudnt be osting his sarcastic,take the piss video blogs evry other day.i can only imagine he smoking cambodias finest before filming. why else is the shades on,jacket off when its 20below, then rants like a left wing hippy drop out an for any subject that grabs his miniscul mind

    what does HE stand for
    what evidence/work in the field has he put up for our review?[zip]
    what has he EVER done for footery[taking the piss out of evertone else work apart]
    In this world it very easy to take te piss whilst never putting yourself out there . sitting as as a self appointed judge on the area as dubious and unfounded as footery is easy pickings. Putting up something of worth or interest isnt.ketchum whether you like or dislike her methods has put years of work into this paper. as a laymn i never thougt she'd get a journal to assossiae itself with anythng as contoversial as bigfoot.itsan out there subject and too esy to take aprt[as idiot lke merchnt show us] so journals wont bother either!

    she had no choice but to buy her own journal and get her 5 year work out there. laypeople like merchant,who probably didnt know what a genome was before ,take her workapart. what a tool

    i would give hetchum cedit for at least trying.as a layman ive no idea if her science is good or bad but at my age i know loudmouth dick wheni constantly hear them.

    just smoke away in the forest merchant and dissappear into your own twlight zone o we dont see or HEAR your rantings 'man'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seriously, is anybody really fooled by acting Reverend Merchant's sermons anymore ?

      Delete
  24. Mike & Melba - sounds of the 60s.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well, I predicted to you Snowball(A YEAR AND A HALF AGO) that you would become this hated if you chose the path of "ALWAYS ATTACkING."

    Yes you are often correct on the obvious, in which case, your preching to the choir.

    But when you go shooting your blow hole off on things of which you are no more qualified than a Peanut farmer, well, WHO CARES.

    I ALSO, remember you screaming ------
    There is no paper!

    Take my word, there is no paper!

    Melba is lying, there is no paper!

    Well, she wrote a paper, like it or not!
    SNOWBALL FAIL!!!!!

    THE PROBLEM -------

    As a discoverer of a new species, the church of SCIENCE says that the new "Discover'er" must bring forth this discovery and lay it at our alter so thaqt we may hold the power and authority forever and ever, AW-MAN!

    The problem is that many of the people she had to "GO-BEFORE" are the same head in the sand people who have been denying the beings existance in the first place.

    Your asking them to not only eat CROW, but to COOK IT UP for the rest of the world. The very SCIENTISTS it would EMBARASS for thier lack of open-mindedness.

    I'm not qualified to understand her information, and as of yet, comments I have seen made are by the un-qualified, Scientists of OTHER fields, and numerous stupid comments like "why didn't they test europeans?" ------ Dumbass, thier already in the GENEBANK, WHAT FOR???

    YOU REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS AT ALL DO YOU -- SNOWBALL?

    YOU ARE PROOF THAT A DEGREE IN ANY FIELD PROOVES NOTHING ABOUT, IQ, BRILLIANCE, DILLIGENCE, DISCOVERY????????

    You know in time will get her on a platform and let here debate 3-5 QUALIFIED geneticists and let THEM determine If she made the right turns/verrifications. She stated that new techniques of science were diployed.

    This on it's own would need verrification before Anyone could substantiate or deny her claims. Nobody has had time to do any of this.

    I suggest you wait, before the hole collapses in around you!


    I have not heard comment or post anywhere, including meldrum, who has offered up SCIENTIFIC evidence that she has failed.

    REAL BRILLIANT SCIENTISTS ARE LOOKING AT THIS DEEPLY I'M SURE. AT SOME POINT---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 OR 4 WILL UNITE AND SAY; THERE IS SOMETHING TO THIS, OR-------------------------------------------------------------------- HERE IS THE FATALL ERROR OR ERRORS --- START OVER!

    You actually expect that a crazy cat vet from Texas pulled off a con on a couple hundred people (including submitters and fellows) for five years????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Now thats CRAZY.

    You may not like her style, she may have an odd way about her.

    Genious often displays oddity. ------------------------------------- 12 gray suits?

    Dropped out of High School?--------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Discovered E=mc2--------------------------------------------------


    You SNOWBAL------------ I like Turtles!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Please have somebody call alex hearn and send this to him. he still believes ketchum report.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?