Patterson Big Reel One Documentary [The Lost Reel]


Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Nadia Moore, a Bigfoot enthusiast and friend of Bigfoot Evidence.

The Bigfoot Discovery Museum has hit the road! That's right Mike Rugg and Ralph Jack just left on their road trip with the producer filming their forthcoming Documentary (working title above)! Their first stop is Willow Creek California, just about any hour from Bluff Creek, the site of the famous Patterson and Gimlin Film of "Patty" the female Sasquatch walking along a sand bar in 1967. (Patterson Gimlin Film History)

While in Willow Creek they will be conducting interviews with local's who knew Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin at the time of their filming, as well as local Bigfoot Historian, Blogger and member of the Bluff Creek Film Site Project Steven Streufert (Bigfoot's bLOG). Perhaps they will even come upon one of Patty's friends or relatives and make history all over again!

Continue reading at: bigfootdiscoveryproject.blogspot.com.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. If my wife looked like the CIA directors I would be cheating on her too.

      Delete
    2. This blog has gone downhill since the dogman poster stopped posting

      Delete
    3. dont worry anon 5:49 im the dogman poster and i will return with great dogman material :-)

      Delete
  2. I wrote in Mike Rugg for President! Keep up the Great work!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The lost tapes,the lost reel. the lost douchebag.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Nadia Moore, a Bigfoot enthusiast and friend of Bigfoot Evidence."

    Uhhhh, she ain't nobody's friend.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I heard the history channel was involved and that reel will be featured on an episode of pawn stars.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sgt. Shoichi Yokoi, a Japanese imperial army straggler who lived in the jungles of Guam for 28 years after World War II ended, died at 5:07 pm Monday Sept 22, 1997 of heart failure at JR Tokai General Hospital in Nagoya Japan. He was 82. Yokoi lived in a tunnel-like, underground cave in a bamboo grove until Jan 24, 1972, when he was discovered near the Talofofo River by hunters.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bill Munns claims are completely ridiculous. He keeps changing them as they are exposed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 15mm lens, film subject 7' 4"?

      Claims of no splicing by examining COPIES only?

      Claiming it could not have been Bob H in the suit.

      Claiming it could not be a suit.

      Shall I go on?

      Delete
    2. Bill Munns has not even finished or presented his research yet, so no, his claims do not keep changing. He has now been able to do extensive recreations thanks to a grant obtained through Dr. Meldrum and The Relict Hominoid Inquiry.

      Delete
    3. you should ask Bill Munns how much and what the grant paid for specifically and list it. That money was well spent according to whom?

      lol?

      When is the "report" going to be complete? Ever? Gee, wonder what the outcome of his report will be.

      Delete
    4. Not a suit obviously, that's strictly for fools now.


      Delete
  8. 'Perhaps they will even come upon one of Patty's friends or relatives and make history all over again!'

    Where's the jar poop guy when you need him?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't worry, I'm here. I was checking on my jars. There's poop in them. Life is good.

      Delete
  9. Thank you Dr Russ Jones of the BFRO for purchasing "the lost tape" and donating it. If no one will say it, I will.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm afraid of bigfoot. I don't want to get Tate Raped by a ten foot monkey.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'll bet you asses to elbows the lost reel has the part with Roger, BobG and the hooker in it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Replies
    1. ^^ not on topic. gonna report you to the admins for threatening my fragile state of being.

      Patty rules, Munns is God and free speech ends when you register. Gooooooo Bigfoot.

      Delete
    2. JREFer,damn dude do you ever work out?
      Worried about your furniture.

      Delete
    3. He does chinups on Randi's nutsack.

      Delete
  13. Do you JREF footer homos still bleeve the lying sack of shit who's pretending to have found the P/G suit ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. More than I bleeve the two lying sacks of shit who claimed they filmed a real one in 1967.

      Delete
    2. I havent seen any suit. What suit do you speak of?

      Delete
    3. More than I bleeve the two lying sacks of shit who pretended to have filmed a real one in 1967.

      Delete
    4. Are you butthurt bffers upset because bigfoot is discussed in the paranormal (Looney toons) section on jref and not in the science section?

      Delete
    5. From the responses I take it that you JREF footer homos still bleeve the lying sack of shit who's pretending to have found the suit. Are you creduloids discounting the obvious stories that clown has already made up or are you all afraid to doubt him because you don't want to be separated from the pretend skeptic herd ?

      Delete
    6. ^the same guy who always posts crying about jref because they were mean to him once

      Delete
    7. ^^
      Admitting that you're a JREF footer homo ?

      Delete
    8. ^^^Hurr Durr lusting after Bart Cutino.

      Delete
    9. Flat Earther anon alert at 5:28.

      Delete
  14. Wouldn't their time and effort be better spent...well...I don't know...finding Bigfoot maybe?

    I know, I know. Crazy talk.

    I'd do it myself, but I have a job, and live in Ohio, where you can't walk 10 feet without a dozen squatchers howling at you.

    ReplyDelete
  15. More than Mulder is looney tunes and more than Munns got fired.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mulder is a comedy genious, no one parodies a bleever as well as him

      Delete
    2. Mulder owns the Randi followers.

      Delete
  16. We have the suit, the collaborating witnesses and confession of the suit wearer. This crappy lost reel ain't gonna save your patty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your a Moron anon 5:41! Trying to hang your hat on a wanna be hoaxer and that ridiculous suit they claimed was Patty! You sound stupid for even making the claim Tard!

      Delete
    2. The turdy troll at 5:41 is just bitter it's all over for the Randies.

      Delete
  17. "I'm not biased but I will prove patty is real!" Lol.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I will be a happy man when/if the PGF debate is over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its over for everyone apart from a few bff loons who can't let it go.

      Delete

    2. Life's to short don't let patty stand in the way of your eternal happiness, it aint nothing but a thing man.

      Delete

  19. Pattys reel and now she's lost, aw crap!

    ReplyDelete
  20. BLUFF creek folks. Clue is right there. I'm sure gimlin has a chuckle about it every now and again.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This film drives me crazy... sometimes I feel that, as Occam's razer dictates, it must be a man in a suit. That is the simplest explanation. Other days, I am convinced it is real. I think we should all stop dwelling on it and find more evidence. Well, you go find it, I've got an important job to do drinking beer on my ass.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes I spilled beer on my ass, and am using a straw to not miss a drop. And I spelled razor wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Patty's got some big ole titties, be nice she might let you squeeze em...even though they may be fake...lol...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess for you real isn't an option so you will have to settle for your blow up dolls fake ones!

      Delete
    2. No he has his mom's to squeeze

      Delete
  24. STEVEN STREUFERT IS NOT A BIGFOOT HISTORIAN!!! ENTHUSIAST, YEAH, MAYBE...BUT HISTORIAN HE IS NOT EVEN CLOSE!!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hopefully the reel that Gimlin said Roger put in his camera after they got Patty on film will turn up as well(if there ever was one). One would think they would have filmed the trackway, the areas where Patty was first and last seen and maybe part of the pursuit. Something like that could be considered supporting evidence, and its absence is indicative of a hoax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not really, the footage we've seen so far an know from over the years was all they allowed us to see probably, it's the bigfootage that got away so to speak either by mistake or whistleblowing, just like NASA sometimes has clear UFO video slip through then naively calling it ice junk.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story