Oops. Here's the high resolution of the "South East Oklahoma Bigfoot"
Our bad. We inadvertently uploaded the wrong "high resolution" photograph. Here's the 2 MB version from Bigfoot Evidence reader tkoenig (And yes, we do see a squatch in this photo):
SE OKLAHOMA...... wood ape....zoom in on chair on the rock porch....now look at the far treeline...see that damn thing?...rangefinder says 125 yards away....GPS says 5 ft lower elevation than where i took the pic from...this thing is at LEAST 8 ft tall...only 2 people on the property... my buddy was 200 yds north using a chainsaw when I took this...I was taking a pic of our rye grass we planted around the cabin last fall(2011).... didn't see this when I took the pic....this is legit.....very private property... 6 miles in behind 2 locked gates...we have been whooped at 3 times on the property ( 800 acres )... many tree SNAPS late at nite...my buddy almost got run over by one at the gate late one nite...went right past him...said it was 5 ft tall down on all 4' s and moving faster than a whitetail....u can post this if you like....happy turkey day
SQUATCH 4 EVER. tkoenig.....pic was taken in may. 2012
still nothing there...first
ReplyDeletefirst... and nice blobsquatch.
ReplyDeleteThank u very much......tkoenig
ReplyDeleteNo bigfoot in Oklahomo.
ReplyDeleteThere is no Oklahoma, therefore there is no bigfoot.
DeleteI am extremely smart.
Stand back.
Trying to revive the ol' "Timmy" -skeptic character eh?
DeleteI think he figured out that Bigfoot is just a bunch of bullshit
hOW Can that a bigft cant seee it
ReplyDeleteHow much whiskey you got left herb?
Deletei m a lttle bit.
DeleteA Weeda bit
DeleteHolidays are tough.
DeleteSasquatch is iridescent?
ReplyDeleteThis sucks. I'm gonna go back and look at Todd standings stuff. I think he was over looked and called a hoaxer way too prematurely.
ReplyDeleteMay as well wait for Les ,the guesser guest get's done see what happens there.
DeleteIf y'all can't see a squatch in that pic then y
ReplyDelete'all are a bunch of taterholes.
Sylvanic Bigfoot
ReplyDeleteThanks for the interesting perspective. And for the record i do have hair, and scatt from these primates. But when i produce the DNA no one cares cause it's been done before. Then they always come back with "How come you can not find a body?"
My anwer..... I WILL!
(taps food impatiently and looks at watch)
DeleteSo........ How about that body you mentioned? Seems like is been, oh I don't know, about 45 years that folks have been looking for the magic ape, and I'm not seeing any body. One would think that it would be pretty tricky for a population of 9 foot apes to go undetected (by anyone smart) in North America for 45 years. It must be awfully difficult for those sasquatches to never shit, or die, or leave any material evidence of there existence whatsoever. Why, their incredible elusiveness might lead some to suspect that sasquatches just might be existence-impaired.
-Johnny Tactful
I don't think it's just me here,,,especially on this site. There may be something to the thousands of reported sightings,,many of those credible witnesses who've had their lives scrambled because of encounter/sighting,,hundreds of casts of tracks,,not ALL can be fakes. And of all the pictures and videos,,,even if 90%(in my opinion the hoax rate may not be that severe) was proven a hoax,,well,,anyone of average intelligence should be able to look at the available info and statistics and all the accounts from many years ago,,and see that this legendary creature is a possibility. It may lead most to the conclusion that knowing most of known/credible details put together,,and knowing as a fact these creatures are not accepted by the "scientific" community(not including those rare few,,as in Dr Meldrum) and we do not have them in zoos,,and lacking a body(that we know of,and leaving out all of the cover up accounts/tales throughout the years)it is very likely these legendary beings may be far more intelligent than anyone has ever guessed.
DeleteYes they can be all fake. every single one of them. and don't start confusin Meldrum's credential for that of an actual scientist. He went into his field of study for the purpose of "proving Bigfoot" he sees it as a confirmation of his religious teachings. So he's about as far away from unbiased as it gets.
DeleteIt's all phoney folks. Your fairy tale creatures aren't real.
You're a fool Robbie. No quantity of lies will ever amount to a truth. No amount of bullshit will ever coalesce into your imaginary ape. You can get all the lying witnesses you want and they can't change reality. There have been a great many “witnesses” to ghosts, Marian apparitions, UFOs, and many other sorts of bullshit. Do you believe them because of the quantity of liars? I'm not even aware of a name for the logical fallacy that you are committing, but your conclusion does not follow your premises. Your statement that “not ALL can be fakes” is categorically untrue. They can, in fact, all be fakes.
DeleteBut of course you don't really care about the truth. You care about the “truth” that you are trying to create in your own mind by repeatedly lying to yourself. You care tearing down the science of biology to try to build up your own ego. You care about denying reality so you can fancy your self smart.
So, I say again: SHOW ME THE MONKEY OR SHUT THE FUCK UP.
- Johnny Slightly-less-tactful
Robbie, thanks for your thoughtful, intelligent reply to 7:27. Nice to see your comments on this site.
DeleteFirst. To anon 7:25,thank you. I try to be polite,,even in the midst of blatant rudeness. Speaking of rudeness and such,,#2 Johny less tactful. Hmm.
DeleteI usually enjoy debating with skeptics,,intelligent skeptics. However I don't have much time now so ill make this short. Get a life. If your a skeptic. Great. That's what any subject needs. If your a "believer" or etc of BF legacy what are you trying to prove? Either way,,if you believe,,you should grow up. It's unfortunate that some people with no manners and etc make the headlines and such,,that makes so many good and decent people look like fools.(witch may be some underlying theme with a few). And the obvious is,,if you don't believe,,,do you actually have nothing better to do with your time? Maybe you should do some serious studying on the topics you state are untrue. If you've put the kind of time as many on this site and myself has into reading reports,,spending down time online for untold amounts of hours studying BF history,,etc,,maybe you would see how people like me are astounded people like you make the claims this creature cannot and does not exsist. And if you can't come up with a better rebuttal than the use of my English,,grammar,,spelling,,,don't bother. I'm not here for English classes. Just here for BF. have a nice day.
DeleteAnd to the other anon with the comment about Jeff Meldrum,,I may be wrong here,,,but his credentials as far as I'm aware actually proves your comment to be bunk. I don't even know why I responded to this. May be trolls chattering nonsense about the good people on the front line of this community gets under my skin. I hope you find a new hobby soon. This field is obviously over your head. Have a wonderful weekend
DeleteI took the pic and u type like an okie....LMFAO!!!!! That was a FUNNY post..,^^^
ReplyDeleteIts an owl. 3 owls in the last week? Not bad going. Owl evidence!
ReplyDeleteOk, is the bigfoot the orange brown person looking thing or the black shadow looming over the orange brown thing?
ReplyDeleteIts the owl shaped thing that looks very owl like
DeleteWow, that turkey I had tonight must have had "wild" in front ot it. I can't see any owls unless they are standing at the treeline looking like a dude in a carhartt jacket or a tree shawdow looming over the dude in the carhartt.
DeleteActually on my laptop, it DOES look like an owl. The orange brown thing does. The shadow still looks like a shadow.
DeleteAnon 7:42.....It's neither because they don't exist, quite simple actually.
DeleteAnyone else enjoy Joe blacks latest video?
ReplyDeletei like all of 'em.
DeleteI'll agree. Outstanding as always.
Deletetwo of them!
ReplyDeleteIt's Rick Dyer in his underware. This is his pick we been waiting on. Ha ha ha ha.
ReplyDeleteJust randomly taking pictures? Or were u searching for a squatch in Oklahoma?
ReplyDeleteIn the description of the photo, the person who took the photo wrote, "I was taking a pic of our rye grass we planted around the cabin last fall(2011).... didn't see this when I took the pic...."
DeleteWhat a material of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable experience on the topic of
ReplyDeleteunexpected emotions.
Also visit my web blog how to make iphone apps
Confirms on glowing white orange logger man.
ReplyDeleteAll points are go.
Definitely a notsquatch.
Buy my book please.
Please?
I don't see him anywhere.
ReplyDeleteIf this guy is having all this activity, he needs to get some game cams on his property fast or get some researchers out there.
ReplyDeleteI don't see shit in this pic.
That's a bigfoot alright, he's glowing because he must have escaped from the underground government cloning labs. Remember, all presidents since Regan have been hatchlings.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like an orange garbage bag caught on some branches. Really you guys? Even with all the Melba hilarity, you keep going back to square one? Very little (IF ANY) progress made in the lab, and almost none made in the community. Only more content to sift through, finding truth in all the lies, and tall tales.
ReplyDeleteThe future of Bigfooting will be done by video chance sighting. as per M.K.Davis comment, is that not whats happening now. Seems so!
DeleteWow. I have pretty good eyesight. It may be. But looks very sketchy.
ReplyDeleteDoes someone actually live in that shack in the foreground of the photo or is it an abandonned outhouse? In any case, my expert conclusion is that the orange apeman was drawn to the property by the chap operating the chainsaw. It is well known in the bigfoot community that the creatures are curious about machinery (many have been spotted near auto factories and steel mills)and this particular beast could not resist the allure of the sweet humming sounds of the man's chainsaw -- I honestly cannot imagine any other possibility.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMatt Moneymaker-"It's a Squatch".
ReplyDeleteI saw it better in the wrong photo u posted
ReplyDeleteAnon 4:38, thanks for your thoughtful, intelligent reply to everybody. Nice to see your comments on this site.
Delete
ReplyDeleteSorry, but I still don't get 2mb more like 617kb that's only 200kb up on the last pic.
Looks like grannie having a quiet poo.
ReplyDeleteBlobsquatch.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't matter how hi-res the photo is if you are 125 yards away and aren't zoomed in on the object.
There just isn't enough detail to see what it is.
It could be a squatch... or a branch on a tree in front of shadows.
The key here is "didn't see this when I took the pic". I'm guessing he didn't see it because it was just shadow.
If you sue me in on the trees. There are a couple of them that are hanging out it looks like.
ReplyDeleteokay I just got home and checked it on my computer screen not my cellphone.when you enlarged the image there is something in the trees that make a x and their is another in the tree above that orange thing that is in the distance. Can someone take a look and let me know.
ReplyDelete