Michael Merchant On FBFB's Nomination of Known Hoaxer In "Top 10 Bigfoot Researchers of 2012"


In this video, Michael Merchant shares his feelings about the current state of affairs regarding the Facebook group, Facebook Find Bigfoot and their nomination of a "serial hoaxer" in their "Top 10 Bigfoot Researchers of The Year" contest. Michael challenges us to list our own worst of the worst Bigfoot "researchers".




Comments

  1. Replies
    1. standing owns the shit out of all your footers

      Delete
    2. The only thing standing owns is ugly orange hair on his body

      Delete
    3. 2:07 a 'footer' is anyone with more than a passing interest in the subject: reads a few books, watches the shows, maybe actually go in the woods if you live near any...but most important of all:trolling this site.

      Delete
  2. His extreme examples make the point of truth in this contemporary arena of so-called "researchers." He offers good lessons in this short video for those who are honest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. snow walker ASSHOLE......why why why are you so sucked in at ALL TIMES. Why dont you & this site stop getting sucked in by all the lame shit flying around. FOCUS ON REAL SHIT. Some people think your smart, I have yet to agree based on all your junior high vids. If your so smart shut up and prove us wrong. So sick of your bug eyed dance vids....your an ass!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why are you so upset? Appears you are the on sucked in. lol

      Delete
  4. my vote go to snow walker ASSHOLE......for the worst

    ReplyDelete
  5. The worst "bigfoot researcher" is Leroy Blevins. A close second is Mkay Duhvis. Both love to see things that are just plain horse shit.

    Out of the "serious" ones, I'd say MM is the worst just because of his claimed success with nothing to show from it, and how fucking crazy he looks hooting and hollering around the woods supposedly calling a bigfoot and encountering it everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  6. snowball is the dumbest bunny

    ReplyDelete
  7. Melba Ketchum (there they go) is.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why do you even care what Fb/Fb does ? If you don't respect them then just leave it alone . So do you just think the list is a total waste of time ? What is your opinion of me I'm on that list do you think my research is questionable ? Are you upset because of who is on it or is it who made it ? A wise person told me one time that if it's not worth the time it's not worth a comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He said in the beginning that clowns and hoaxers make the rest of you guys,the legit (honest,sincere serious) researchers look like idiots. He's probably correct so far as the general public is concerned. Given all his activity, he has the right to separate himself from the hoaxers and opportunists by pointing out who they are.

      Given FB/FB's complete lack of discrimination and willful ignorance of provenance there is a good chance they are just trying to make a few internet bucks while having a laugh. If that is the case, do you want to be on their list?

      Delete
    2. No one with any sense of pride would want to be on a list with *Mr. Serial Hoaxer".

      Delete
  9. Hes upset his name isnt on the list and dick ryer is

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kevin Thomas Kehl and I are on that list aswell. Is our work questionable? We show everything we find, including the trackway prints (that got us on this list), the recorded audio, and the latest sighting video (Matt Moneymaker Twittered that he believed it was real). Our trail cam project is yielding results and Kevin and I are back from the field, and will be back out Saturday and Sunday taking measurements and redeploying a game cam.

    We Are always in field. We have no time to gripe about others. This work is important. It is done, however, on our dime. I am insulted that you would think otherwise.

    Maine is a wonderful wilderness. Every second you spend focused on others, is a second you could have found proof.

    Stay thirsty my friend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you expect a medal for fooling moneymaker?

      Delete
    2. Tim, you have done some very questionable things in the past, so of course your evidence is being questioned.
      To date I have not seen one reputable analysis done on your trackway or the casts obtained from the trackway. I haven't seen any videos of you and your crew taking measurements of the prints or strides from the trackway.
      You need to provide something that will make me trust and believe what you present. Past deeds are never forgotten, and almost impossible to live down.

      Delete
    3. I don't understand why shawn lets this guy have these ridiculous rants on here. All he ever does is try to tear down what someone else is doing. But of course he doesn't do anything himself. Thanks Shawn that just damages your credibility for allowing this to be posted. This guy is a joke and a total loser and buy allowing him to post this crap it makes you one too. When he can produce something other than the diarhea that constantly runs out his mouth people might start taking him seriously. until then Michael Merchant shut the fuck up! Your not funny and everybody thinks your a moron. Just shut up and stop making Shawn look like an idiot for publishing this crap

      Delete
    4. Geez Fasano! I've found far more compelling evidence than you've ever produced and I wouldn't call myself a serious researcher or worthy of this list...therefore, you aren't worthy of the list either. On the flip side, you've contributed far more than Rick Dyer's giant goose egg so feel confident that you clubbed his sorry arse like a baby seal.

      Delete
    5. Nobody likes you here and you making yourself look silly

      Delete
    6. lol @ celebrating the fact moneymaker threw you a crumb

      Delete
  11. Its all being published next Thursday. Then we celebrate

    ReplyDelete
  12. tim of course your work is questionable. Why would anyone think otherwise?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Merchant seems like a complete media whore to me. I have a LOT more respect for FBFB. They at least offer theories and a positive attitude.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're either Freezer Boy or FB/FB fan boy. I wouldn't admit to either one if I was you.

      Delete
    2. Ha... I don't put fbfb on a pedestal but at least they don't trigger my gag reflex. Merchant takes the cake with his faux wilderness videos with roosters crowing in the background.

      Delete
    3. Watch the Out of the Wild series. Tell me what is *faux* about that.

      Delete
  14. Dyer and Fasano seem more credible tnan fb/fb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rush is #1, the Bacardi Anejo is flowing...

      Delete
    2. Rush rules,Dyer drools..cheers my friend

      Delete
  15. showhackerpride is just that, a prideful showboat. He deserves to be #1 hoaxer.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So this sounds like a jealous rant to me. What have you done to contribute to finding proof of the big guy? I can tell you, not a damn thing. You are out there and I respect that, but you have nothing to show other than sarcastic comments and video satire. Why are you so against people like Todd Standing, MK Davis, and Chris Noel? Because they make real contributions? You like to spew your rhetoric against their work but can you show the rest of us why their work is not legit? Show me something or STFU. Even the hated hoaxer has somem evidence that you can't figure out how he hoaxed it. If you could we would be watching video after video of you recreating it. He beat you. (I didn't mention his name so you wouldn't delete my post)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! spot on woodbooger, the haters will always hate. I talk to Todd about every other week, he is absolutely legit. You know it takes a lot of balls to do what Standing is doing, very few people could accomplish what he has.

      Delete
    2. Standing is a hoaxer(obviously) and so is MK( as proven by his constant use of the Sells tapes). Chris Noel I think is honest, but naive. SWP talks to witnesses and goes out and looks for the things? What else can you do(besides hoaxing and making videos with lots of claims and ZERO evidence)?

      Delete
  17. Gimme a break. He's an educated guy and an experienced outdoors man. Cryptozoology needs people like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ meant for 5:51 above...

      Delete
    2. Merchant is just saying; what most of us are thinking.

      Delete
  18. SWP has every right to be pissed off, THE CRAZIES OF THE BIGFOOT COMMUNITY RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE, and turn away any serious attention that should be paid to this FUCKING ongoing mystery!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Even though I think SWP can be a bit loud on an ongoing basis, I'd much rather be in the woods researching with him over anyone else on that list. That list has a few decent contributors to footing, but also has solid candidates for dipshit of the decade. Just my opinion, but Paulides should be researcher of the year. At least he's humble and intelligent.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Do you have anything to do with this bigfootevidencenew.com.is this gourd name

    ReplyDelete
  21. Paulides "humble and intelligent." do you read the garbage he puts out saying how professional he is, how everyone else is clueless as he's sucking off himself and a couple of clowns working with him?? Humble lol. Thats fucking funny

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He believes, or at least hints at a Bigfoot/ufo connection. Then there is the whole "missing people in national parks grabbed by Bigfoot" theory he puts out.

      Delete
  22. Personal opinions and gripes aside all the bickering back stabbing and bitching does nothing to further the general publics perception of bigfoot. Period.

    For all those who genuinely WANT Bigfoot Research to progress then Researchers AND Organizations need to unite.

    In order for that to work you need to let go the reigns of machismo and communicate to each other (Bigfoot has the bigger balls here).

    Someone whos head of a reputable BF Organization - START THE BALL ROLLING and form a United BF Organization headed and run by key members of all satellite organizations in North America (later global) and share information, get a brand together to market yourselves, make yourselves approachable, set up a doctrine and then YOU will become a credible force.

    Do this and the net closes on in the Big Fella.

    ReplyDelete
  23. What a joke. Who the hell is this guy. Dude don't quit your day job. Team gayzer...lmao. hang tight brothe (or sister) one person you like smashing is on to some big things. Can't wait to see your face....lmao

    Who thehell are you? And your fan base. Shit, just as twisted. Your not a funny person. I think your the only one that thinks so. .. happy hunting

    ReplyDelete
  24. freezer boy doesnt seem to ever go out in the woods. All his videos are in his car, him singing, dancing like a jack ass. Does this guy ever actually go out in the woods?
    To other great nominees are T-FAT and joebblack1963..They do go out in the woods. But Joe BBlack1963 sees bigfoot in every bush, on his deck, in his glove box.
    T-FAT is also out in the woods. Of course he is a pathetic little man that thinks every one is a hoaxer except himself..And every month or so he has a video that will turn the bigfoot world upside down..I never see anything but his fat ass talking into the camera..I do see a bigmouth

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story