BigfootWeekend September Expedition

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Melba Ketchum: We have not said that it has angel DNA


Robert Lindsay published an article over the weekend stating from a "source" that Ketchum's report references "Angel DNA". This has caused a number of people to come to Ketchum's defense. One person close to Ketchum, who says he "can't give the full statement" claims that "'Angelic...' was used as the code word for the DNA". On Team Tazer's Facebook page, Melody Knowles explains that "Angel DNA" is an old term used for unknown DNA.

"Melba is at least my age (old, older than her profile pic suggests!), and would be well familiar with that term. But RL pouncing on that terminology is going to lead some to pick up an alien/Nephilium connection. And some who sit behind the desks at the journals may also not be too familiar with it and have reservations as well as up and coming scientists that will be reading the paper. Best to take the term out of the paper and just use 'unknown' instead," she wrote.

It's not clear to anyone whether Ketchum's paper references the term "Angel" or not. To get to bottom of it, the blog Bizarre Zoology, wrote an email to Dr. Melba Ketchum asking her what the real deal is. The following is what she wrote:

"Thank you so much for emailing to ask these questions. While I cant answer everything until the release of the paper I will try to help where I can. In the paper you will find a explanation as to the great lengths Dr. Ketchum went to make sure no contamination was possible. There were more than three labs that the samples were sent to and yes they showed the same results. All the details on the entire research will be released with this paper. We did the press release due to a leak of information.,This was why we had no choice but to do the press release. The paper will be out hopefully in the next few weeks. We do not have a date yet but feel it is soon. We have not said that it has angel DNA . That was not said by anyone on our team , but someone else on the outside. That is very much a false rumor. I hope you are able to read the paper that will be coming out. I think it will put your mind at ease and give you the answers you desire."

Visit bizarrezoology.blogspot.com for the full write-up.

84 comments:

  1. First ;)

    Thanks so very much for mentioning my blog, Shawn!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has an awesome blog. Check it out everyone!

      Delete
    2. Will do Shawn, would you like to start a Rush section to this blog? Just kidding... Thanks for this site and if there is anything I can help you out with please let me know.

      Delete
    3. Haha loving the first, second, third comments there thanks everyone haha ;).

      Delete
    4. Shawns probably a Rush fan

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. So once Again this total fucking commy miss-fit Robert Lindsay has caused a shit storm because "HE" is Dumber than a pig fucking a stump.

      Now the guy admits to being a commy, and what do commies do -------- Miss-information. He wouldn't know the truth if it pissed down his throat.

      Of course "Angel" means unknown.

      If you didn't know that and you thought that ment "actual" Angel DNA, well your pretty fucking dumb.

      That would mean that somebody Mapped Angel DNA and didn't even bother to tell anyone ------ right!

      It's just like the term "Angel" Investor, money from the unexpected or high risk tolarable. "ANGEL" has often substituted for the "unknown"

      But they didn't say it has any Gorilla or ape or any--other known DNA.

      If you got proof that something is walking around out there and it is Half human DNA and Half something unknown, Do you skeptics want to Dream up a new creature -----------------

      OR just Admit BIGFOOT is real?

      Bunch of Dipshits!

      We can argue about who or what contributed the other half later.

      Here are the traits that could show up if it has to do with "The biblical Giants"

      1 giant of course.
      2. 6 toed and 6 fingered.
      3. Covered in hair?
      4. potentially long lived. -- Immortality.

      Creatures could exhibit all or only some of these traits. We have stories litered through history of men or creatures with some or all of these traits. The conquestadors wrote about Giant Red haired, 6toed 6fingerd, blue eyed giants in South America. Plus legends from allover the world.

      There is something nasty in the woodpile of hummanity!! No doubt!

      Except for the last, --- doesn't really sound like an Angel now does it.

      If this thing is from Cain, it is cursed, not an angel.

      If there is something involved from an actual "Angel." IT WOULDN'T BE FROM A GOOD ANGEL ANYWAY.

      If you want to look at it Bilically, This thing would be a DNA modified being done by the Fallen ANGELS.

      WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS WALKING AROUND ON THIS EARTH THAT WAS SO EVIL, MEAN , AND NASTY THAT GOD SAID SCREW-IT, I'M STARTING OVER. WELL, TAKE A LOOK AT ALL THOSE NASTY, MURDEROSE CREATURES THEY HAD IN "MYTH" IN THE ANCIENT DAYS. NOW IF THOSE THINGS (DEMONIC) IN NATURE WERE RUNNING AROUND, WELL GOD WOULD NEED TO CLEAN HOUSE WOULDN'T HE?

      Delete
    2. TO conclude, THE DOOR IS WIDE OPEN, STILL DON'T KNOW "WHAT " IT IS????


      BUT IT "IS", AND THATS ENOUGH FOR YOU IDIOTS THAT STILL DON'T THINK IT'S THERE AT ALL.

      KISS MY ASS!

      Delete
    3. Dude, go have a drink. This shit is just important enough to give yourself a stroke over.

      Delete
    4. I DO THIS FOR FUN, NUCLEAR FUSION IS HARD!

      Delete
    5. Wazz up Leon! Congrats! ;)

      Delete
    6. Leon once again you have proven yourself to be fucking crazy of there was a God idiots like you are probably the reason why he he has forsaken us

      Delete
    7. say hi to jesus for us leon,you do talk to him,right?I'm thinking you're not a Rush fan.

      Delete
    8. I'm a Rush fan, and I talk to Jesus. Say hi to Him yourself, you may be surprised. Rag on me all you want. Atheists don't piss me off like they used to--I finally realized that they will remember the conversations they had with those of us who know Truth, and they will know that we were correct. Unfortunately for you, that will be the very, very least of your problems, and I pity you. And I don't care if you don't want my pity--you have it anyway and, sadly, one day you will understand why.

      Delete
  3. Lots of misinformation out there. Rumors abound! Let's give Melba some time to finish this stuff! Exciting time for the Bigfoot world. Wish you luck and I will be awaiting the formal announcement!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yesterday I would have called her a fruitcake but after the bodies story from Lindsay today maybe she isn't so nutty as we're led to believe. Unless someone has told her to tone down the crazy a little or people won't take you seriously and this is some kind of damage control now the media have found the story?

      Delete
    2. Fair enough, but there are problems. How can you not know if the article will be out in the next few weeks or not? Journals are not newspapers, they publish monthly or bi-monthly or even less frequently and they tell you what edition your paper will be in well in advance. They send you copies of it as it will appear in the journal,too.

      Delete
    3. Seems like a valid point, do you think it's even finished?

      Delete
    4. I think they were rejected once or twice and this latest re-write is now done and will be released in a non-peer reviewed medium. We will see. There is some kind of article, I believe.

      Delete
  4. People People! Let's just be patient! Angel DNA! I told you it was a not correct and people ran with that crap like it was truth! Need to use your head!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The most logical conclusion is that there's something very weird in the bigfoot DNA. Maybe not angels in the sense we see them portrayed, but in a certain sense, yeah. You cannot shoot down possibilities out of hand because you don't like how it sounds. It may just be the truth.

      Delete
    2. I think if you are logically minded and not a believer in the paranormal or religion it's easy to doubt there is real Angel DNA there. At best if there is anything there at all we just discovered a new spiecies of primate that's all wouldn't get those religious hopes up of real Angelic proof

      Delete
  5. I swear if I hear the word soon one more fucking time from these people I'll............well I just piss and moan about as usual but enough with that soon shit.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Deadlines are meant to be broken,

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well...as long as the paper is going to be published *soon*.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. well we only have like what? three weeks or so till the earth goes boom? Hopefully soon means before then

      Delete
    2. That's right! Be positive, the end of the world is right around the corner; and we can then be done with this B.S.

      Delete
    3. December 21st 2012 is it!!

      Delete
    4. A few weeks is what she said in October. October Of 2011.......

      Delete
    5. Knowing my luck,,end of days happens,,,just before the paper is released lol.

      Delete
    6. double down on Rush and rum

      Delete
  8. Anybody up for a mass suicide?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Lindsey's article mentions specifically that Melba's early report did mention Nephilim. Go read it. If what was said there is true, there's no way she meant "angelic" as anything other than what it sounds like to us poor non-scientists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. your key word being Lindsey

      lindsey = bullshit

      Delete
  10. There'll be no strings to bind your hands
    Not if my love can find your heart
    And there's no need to take a stand
    For it was I who choose to start
    I see no need to take me home
    I'm old enough to face the dawn

    Just call me angel of the morning, angel
    Just touch my cheek before you leave me
    Oh my baby
    Just call me angel of the morning, angel
    Then slowly turn away from me

    Maybe the sunlight will be dim
    But it won't matter anyhow
    If morning's echoes say we've sinned
    Then it was what I wanted now
    And if we're victims of the night
    I won't be blinded by the light

    Oh my baby
    Just call me angel of the morning, angel
    Just touch my cheek before you leave me, baby
    Just call me angel of the morning
    Then slowly turn away from me


    Just call me angel of the morning, angel
    Just touch my cheek before you leave me

    Just call me angel of the morning, angel
    Just touch my cheek before you leave me, darling
    Just call me angel of the morning, angel
    Just touch my cheek before you leave me, darling
    Just call me angel of the morning, angel

    Just touch my cheek before you leave me darling

    ReplyDelete
  11. Angel is a Greek word meaning Paulides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have challenged my honor, sir.
      Tomorrow at dawn- pipettes at fifty paces.
      Nobody stops until there is angel DNA on the ground.

      Delete
    2. Gentlemen. Gentlemen. Please,,,let's not get too carried away away here.

      Delete
  12. There is good reason this was not peer reviewed, and will not be by any reputable journal. This is garbage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're a garbage collector indeed.

      Delete
    2. Indeed I am. Some peoples trash is another's desire. You can call me the trash man.

      Delete
    3. Anon 7:20:

      Dear Trash Can,

      Oh! sorry,

      Dear Trash Man,

      You are kindly requested to click the link at the top of your screen to review your arrest record.

      You see, you must be vetted before I can clear you as a candidate for today's Golden Idiot Award.

      Though your post obviously plumbs the depths of slack-jawed, drooling, knuckle-dragging stupidity, we have to make sure you are otherwise qualified to receive this award.

      The judges are standing by and await your information. Upon clearance, you will be nominated and requested to report to Mayor McCheese to receive your prize for being such a stupdenous idiot.

      Congratulations Trash Can!

      Oh! Congratulations, Trash Man/anon 7:20!

      Delete
  13. If the "response" was written by her new PR person, she will be in deeper doo-doo real quick. The person doesn't use proper grammar or utilize correct sentence structure. This will make Melba look like she's not very smart.

    PR is everything. Look at Finding Bigfoot......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, knock it off! She's a bigfoot habitater!!

      she feeds them bluberry muffins!!

      Delete
    2. I think Dr. Ketchum's publicist is her third grade granddaughter.

      Delete
    3. Close! After correcting the errors, Word gave it a Flesch-Kincaid score of 4.5 grade level. xD

      Delete
  14. Peer reviewed in this field means a cat vet, a tow truck driver and a guy with his hand up a bird's ass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well,all three mentioned have accomplished more than most tatertrolls. Lmao

      Delete
  15. Now they are outright lying with weasel words. It is a fact replicated in many phone conversations that reliable figures have had with Ketchum that she specifically mentioned the Nephilim, "something out of this world" in the DNA, and yes, the word "angel" in conjunction with these statements. In context, this interpretation is undeniable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have not seen any mention of DNA from "out of this world" on Ketchum's press release or interview. I personally feel that Robert Lindsay (or his source that gave him the information) was lying.

      Delete
  16. Dr. Ketchum is available for interview or to answer further questions about the Sasquatch genome study and associated research on novel contemporary hominins at media@dnadiagnostics.com

    ReplyDelete
  17. Angel DNA was about the first thing they said; that made any sense. And now you're telling me...they don't have Angel DNA? Bloody hell. Just when I thought this paper was going legit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, Snow! How can one keep his sanity following this crap??

      I feel I'm neglecting my chores since this came about.













      Delete
    2. showwhackerpride, I concede, I will no longer degrade you, and the name is gone. After all this time, you actually make sense.

      Delete
  18. We should all stfu until everything is released. Then we can insult everyone else anonymously (however thats spelled). Can't we all just get along?

    -Rodney

    ReplyDelete
  19. According to this statement, the peer review is OVER. The Ketchum paper has already been accepted and will be published. Am I reading this right? If so, that is the only thing that will clear any of this up.
    The above statement does not address the habitator dog food bagle-eating bigfoot-communicating stories. It does not tell us about the review process. It does not tell us how many more than three labs checked the samples. Most importantly, it does not give us a firm date after which we can call "bullshit" if it doesn't appear in print.
    Dr. Ketchum, this has disintegrated into a disappointing midway sideshow, with rumors of hoodoo voodoo and hidden corpses flying everywhere. The statements attributed to you suggest your paper is forthcoming and will stand on its own merits. Fair enough. But the rest has been evasive double-talk which makes it sound like another media stunt and a hoax.
    Has your report been vetted, was it accepted for publication, by whom, and on what date will it appear in the public domain? Clear answers to those questions would go a long way toward repairing the credibility of the project and putting it back in the realm of science -- where I think you'd agree it belongs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She could be "published" in a fringe journal that sidesteps that sticky issue of peer review. Or perhaps she'll "publish" on a pay-per-view website.

      Delete
  20. Ketchum hasn't released shit. She's just made a lot of extremely weird claims. Claims that have been rejected by scientific journals, and will never be published except for profit in a package made to dupe believers.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mr. Hankey the Christmas Poo- sometimes he's nutty, sometimes he's corny, and sometimes he's practicaly water!
    Hey, hey, hey-smoke weed everyday!

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm not making any remarks/claims or etc until the results/paper is published. Most of us understand the magnitude of this. If we are waiting weeks months later,,well,,yes I'll be a tad cranky. Despite personal differences,,,this study can tell the world one thing. We're not crazy,,,were not drunk,,were not mentally ill. These awesome beings are not figments of imagination,,like some of the tatertrolls love to chant. They are real.

    ReplyDelete
  23. " The paper will be out hopefully in the next few weeks. We do not have a date yet but feel it is soon."

    Bring It!

    We expect it December 19th, ok December 28th.

    Else, we call BS and Hoax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a nonsense statement. They would be told what issue the article will appear in. What, you think you buy the journals weekly at a news stand hoping your work is published? Something is not right.

      Delete
  24. Human hybrids?

    The people peddling this lie were the same people peddling the patty nonsense.

    First of all it was "patty shows compliant gate, mid tarsal gate, a very ape like creature."

    But now "Bigfoot is human and we have known this all along"

    Do you see how stupid you sound?

    ReplyDelete
  25. So in the email answer did Dr. Ketchum refer to herself in the third person? Remus thinks she did.

    ReplyDelete
  26. "One person close to Ketchum"

    Someone said they were close to Ketchum !

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that
    it's really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

    my blog sex cam free live

    ReplyDelete
  28. I constantly spent my half an hour to read
    this web site's articles or reviews daily along with a cup of coffee.

    Take a look at my web site - www.feedbooks.com

    ReplyDelete
  29. excellent submit, very informative. I ponder why the
    other specialists of this sector do not understand this.
    You should proceed your writing. I am sure, you've a huge readers' base already!



    Feel free to surf to my weblog: http://www.Brunomars.com/

    ReplyDelete
  30. Piece of writing writing is also a fun, if you know then
    you can write or else it is complex to write.


    Here is my blog ... free sex pornol

    ReplyDelete
  31. I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the layout
    of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got
    to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of
    content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one
    or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?

    Also visit my site free nude sex webcams *http://sexyeatz.com/index.php/blogs/4371/7965/hunting-for-the-top-live-sex-cha*

    ReplyDelete