Here's What Matt Moneymaker Thinks About The Clinton Township Bigfoot Photo

By -
Bigfoot Photo Credit: Jamie T.
Taken in Clinton Township, PA

Contrary to popular belief, Finding Bigfoot's Matt Moneymaker doesn't always jump to conclusions. We asked him what his thoughts are on the recent Bigfoot photo from Clinton Township, PA. Here's his response:

"Looks like artificial fur to me, based on the color shade and uniformity of color. I think it's a Halloween costume that is intentionally obscured." - Matt Moneymaker


Comments

  1. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 7:57:00 PM PST

    Booya. Wow

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 7:58:00 PM PST

    He doesnt think its a sqautch...... Thats a first

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mayor McCheeseWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:00:00 PM PST

    It's David Caruso's man bush.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LobsterBoyWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:23:00 PM PST

      I shudder wondering how you know that....

      Delete
    2. Jellybean SmurfThursday, November 8, 2012 at 1:55:00 PM PST

      Mayor, you get a million internet points for originality on that one, and another million for giving me a belly laugh.

      Delete
  4. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:06:00 PM PST

    I bet its a guy wearing a Camouflaged, blaze orange, hunting suit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:13:00 PM PST

    It's the mother of Sheamus.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:22:00 PM PST

    Don't animals develop a sort of natural camouflage to their surroundings? Shouldn't an animal this color be in the rain forest or something? ... or at least not look like a bright orange fucken traffic cone?
    I'd say this is a fake, but I honestly can't imagine that someone would be dumb enough to make a costume out of a thousand bright orange crayola crayons.
    Maybe this is the elusive Lucile Ballicus Giganticus ...

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:23:00 PM PST

    This thing couldn't hide anywhere in the wild.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:25:00 PM PST

    Are you sure that's not a roaring camp fire?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Smellthisa Hoe V.Wednesday, November 7, 2012 at 8:51:00 PM PST

    In my many years of investigating this phenomenon I've come across many backsides. Some have come across my backsides as well. Sometimes you have to use NDA's to deal with the aftermath. Just post it anon, or claim it was given to you from an anon source like I do.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Money MuckrakerWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 9:02:00 PM PST

    Why would anyone bother posting this in the first place? Real or fake, it is far away and blurry. It's so easy to take a decent photo nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousThursday, November 8, 2012 at 4:07:00 AM PST

      These footers are turning into religious fanatics like the people who see the Virgin Mary in a piece of toast. Every single picture and video of anything on 2 feet is bigfoot and you will never convince them otherwise.

      Delete
  11. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 10:22:00 PM PST

    I concur, un-natural color. I know this area of PA. It would have caught a bullet or arrow by now. Bring on the next hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 11:09:00 PM PST

    "I DON'T ALWAYS JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS......
    BUT WHEN I DO,
    IT'S A SQUATCH"

    (This coming from a guy whose caught what? A cold?)


    "I DON'T ALWAYS JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS......
    BUT WHEN I DO,
    IT'S NOTHING CONFIRMED"

    ReplyDelete
  13. Big Jim JrWednesday, November 7, 2012 at 11:58:00 PM PST

    I think it is a leaf that got hung up on the branches. Then a blurry photo was taken. Otherwise, it has three legs or one big hairy...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PROKILLThursday, November 8, 2012 at 12:24:00 AM PST

      How can it be a leaf when there are no other leaves of that color anywhere else in the photo?

      It sure as shit ain't a squatch but it ain't no fuckin leaf Big Jimmy

      Delete
    2. AnonymousThursday, November 8, 2012 at 4:08:00 AM PST

      Prokill is right...it would be foolish to assume there was a leaf in the forest. But there's definitely a Bigfoot there!

      Delete
  14. Big Jim JrThursday, November 8, 2012 at 1:05:00 AM PST

    We can't see the ground really but it would be very easy to pick up a leaf and drop it on the branches. On this screen in hd, it looks more brown than orange. Like a dead, wet maple leaf. Since the branches are pretty much bare, all those dead leaves have to be somewhere close. I will ses if I can tweak it or zoom in more but it looks like whatever is in the branches and not far off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big Jim JrThursday, November 8, 2012 at 1:12:00 AM PST

      Sure looks like the thing's color overlaps some of the branches to me. Plus the trees behind the branches look even more blurry than the thing. I'm sticking with leaf or foliage.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousThursday, November 8, 2012 at 3:32:00 AM PST

      id love to see his comments if they took the photo themelves in their ridiculas[but watchable] 'finding bigfoot'show.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

By -
Image
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Read more

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

By -
Image
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure. 
Read more

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

By -
Image
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Read more