Here's What Matt Moneymaker Thinks About The Clinton Township Bigfoot Photo
 |
| Bigfoot Photo Credit: Jamie T. Taken in Clinton Township, PA |
Contrary to popular belief, Finding Bigfoot's Matt Moneymaker doesn't always jump to conclusions. We asked him what his thoughts are on the recent Bigfoot photo from Clinton Township, PA. Here's his response:
"Looks like artificial fur to me, based on the color shade and uniformity of color. I think it's a Halloween costume that is intentionally obscured." - Matt Moneymaker
Booya. Wow
ReplyDeleteHe doesnt think its a sqautch...... Thats a first
ReplyDeleteIt's David Caruso's man bush.
ReplyDeleteI shudder wondering how you know that....
DeleteMayor, you get a million internet points for originality on that one, and another million for giving me a belly laugh.
DeleteI bet its a guy wearing a Camouflaged, blaze orange, hunting suit.
ReplyDeleteIt's the mother of Sheamus.
ReplyDeleteDon't animals develop a sort of natural camouflage to their surroundings? Shouldn't an animal this color be in the rain forest or something? ... or at least not look like a bright orange fucken traffic cone?
ReplyDeleteI'd say this is a fake, but I honestly can't imagine that someone would be dumb enough to make a costume out of a thousand bright orange crayola crayons.
Maybe this is the elusive Lucile Ballicus Giganticus ...
This thing couldn't hide anywhere in the wild.
ReplyDeleteAre you sure that's not a roaring camp fire?
ReplyDeleteIn my many years of investigating this phenomenon I've come across many backsides. Some have come across my backsides as well. Sometimes you have to use NDA's to deal with the aftermath. Just post it anon, or claim it was given to you from an anon source like I do.
ReplyDeleteWhy would anyone bother posting this in the first place? Real or fake, it is far away and blurry. It's so easy to take a decent photo nowadays.
ReplyDeleteThese footers are turning into religious fanatics like the people who see the Virgin Mary in a piece of toast. Every single picture and video of anything on 2 feet is bigfoot and you will never convince them otherwise.
DeleteI concur, un-natural color. I know this area of PA. It would have caught a bullet or arrow by now. Bring on the next hoax.
ReplyDelete"I DON'T ALWAYS JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS......
ReplyDeleteBUT WHEN I DO,
IT'S A SQUATCH"
(This coming from a guy whose caught what? A cold?)
"I DON'T ALWAYS JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS......
BUT WHEN I DO,
IT'S NOTHING CONFIRMED"
I think it is a leaf that got hung up on the branches. Then a blurry photo was taken. Otherwise, it has three legs or one big hairy...
ReplyDeleteHow can it be a leaf when there are no other leaves of that color anywhere else in the photo?
DeleteIt sure as shit ain't a squatch but it ain't no fuckin leaf Big Jimmy
Prokill is right...it would be foolish to assume there was a leaf in the forest. But there's definitely a Bigfoot there!
DeleteWe can't see the ground really but it would be very easy to pick up a leaf and drop it on the branches. On this screen in hd, it looks more brown than orange. Like a dead, wet maple leaf. Since the branches are pretty much bare, all those dead leaves have to be somewhere close. I will ses if I can tweak it or zoom in more but it looks like whatever is in the branches and not far off.
ReplyDeleteSure looks like the thing's color overlaps some of the branches to me. Plus the trees behind the branches look even more blurry than the thing. I'm sticking with leaf or foliage.
Deleteid love to see his comments if they took the photo themelves in their ridiculas[but watchable] 'finding bigfoot'show.
Delete