|Image credit: Carl Olinselot|
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Bigfoot Evidence reader, Bob C.
I have been watching and scrutinizing videos of Bigfoot for slightly over a year now. I never thought much on the subject until last year. I was deer hunting with my then 17 year old boy when I heard two loud howls that ended with a guttural snort. It was out of the ordinary to say the least. My boy was 500 yards or so away from me and when we met back up the first thing he asked me was, "what the hell was that?"
It spiked my curiosity and I have been researching the possibilities since. I have heard very similar vocalizations on the internet that were reported as coming from Bigfoot. Was it Bigfoot? I have no idea, but it was not something I have heard before. I grew up in the woods, hunting and fishing and playing, but I am no expert when it comes to wildlife and the sounds they can make, But, that said, I have NEVER heard that sound or anything like it in all my years, only similar sounds posted on the net.
Anyway, that is what brought me here. What I find amazing is the rift between the knowers and the other knowers. One group knows without a doubt that they exist. The other group knows without a doubt that they absolutely do not exist. I don't know either way, but I am curious and interested. I would guess that both sides of the coin are curious at least, or why bother? If I totally did not believe for an instance then why would I waste my time? Of course, some people probably get a kick out of harassing the "believers". I don't see the point in it myself, but whatever.
So, lets discuss the fence sitters (me in particular). I want EVIDENCE. And when actual evidence is produced, I like to see breakdowns. (Serious breakdowns) and listen to intelligent discussions on the matter. I want someone with creds to evaluate and critique. I don't like it when certain groups throw the evidence under the bus strictly because of the rep the guy has that got the evidence, or that he has a mindset that differs from theirs. I don't know if Bigfoot can be habituated or not, but some of the people that claim they can have some damn interesting EVIDENCE.
I read the articles and watch the videos with much interest. I stopped reading the comments quite some time ago because of all of the negativity that was posted no matter how good the post or video. But what gets me more than that is when the groups of researchers act just like the anons in the comment section. There are many "researchers" out there that I don't trust and doubt the authenticity of their evidence, but that doesn't mean they won't get the hard evidence someday. Therefore I reserve judgement.
Ok, I'm going to say it. I think the tent video is really compelling. What bothers me is the lack of breakdowns and discussion. It seems to me it was discarded immediately after being discovered that Rick Dyer had something to do with it. SCRUTINIZE. Show us that it is fake. Show us that FBFB is completely full of shit. Don't just call them fakers and idiots and make jokes about them. I mean Dyer may have just taken credit for something he had nothing to do with once Kulls said it was his. I haven't seen any proof that he took the video other than the fact he has a tent of the same color. But assuming he took it, show us why it is a fake. It is better than anything else I've seen short the PG film. Happy hunting...
Here is FB/FB's breakdown of the camper video:
Camper video enhanced: