Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Can Someone Prove To Me The Tent/Camper Video Is Fake?

Image credit: Carl Olinselot

Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Bigfoot Evidence reader, Bob C.

I have been watching and scrutinizing videos of Bigfoot for slightly over a year now. I never thought much on the subject until last year. I was deer hunting with my then 17 year old boy when I heard two loud howls that ended with a guttural snort. It was out of the ordinary to say the least. My boy was 500 yards or so away from me and when we met back up the first thing he asked me was, "what the hell was that?"

It spiked my curiosity and I have been researching the possibilities since. I have heard very similar vocalizations on the internet that were reported as coming from Bigfoot. Was it Bigfoot? I have no idea, but it was not something I have heard before. I grew up in the woods, hunting and fishing and playing, but I am no expert when it comes to wildlife and the sounds they can make, But, that said, I have NEVER heard that sound or anything like it in all my years, only similar sounds posted on the net.

Anyway, that is what brought me here. What I find amazing is the rift between the knowers and the other knowers. One group knows without a doubt that they exist. The other group knows without a doubt that they absolutely do not exist. I don't know either way, but I am curious and interested. I would guess that both sides of the coin are curious at least, or why bother? If I totally did not believe for an instance then why would I waste my time? Of course, some people probably get a kick out of harassing the "believers". I don't see the point in it myself, but whatever.

So, lets discuss the fence sitters (me in particular). I want EVIDENCE. And when actual evidence is produced, I like to see breakdowns. (Serious breakdowns) and listen to intelligent discussions on the matter. I want someone with creds to evaluate and critique. I don't like it when certain groups throw the evidence under the bus strictly because of the rep the guy has that got the evidence, or that he has a mindset that differs from theirs. I don't know if Bigfoot can be habituated or not, but some of the people that claim they can have some damn interesting EVIDENCE.

I read the articles and watch the videos with much interest. I stopped reading the comments quite some time ago because of all of the negativity that was posted no matter how good the post or video. But what gets me more than that is when the groups of researchers act just like the anons in the comment section. There are many "researchers" out there that I don't trust and doubt the authenticity of their evidence, but that doesn't mean they won't get the hard evidence someday. Therefore I reserve judgement.

Ok, I'm going to say it. I think the tent video is really compelling. What bothers me is the lack of breakdowns and discussion. It seems to me it was discarded immediately after being discovered that Rick Dyer had something to do with it. SCRUTINIZE. Show us that it is fake. Show us that FBFB is completely full of shit. Don't just call them fakers and idiots and make jokes about them. I mean Dyer may have just taken credit for something he had nothing to do with once Kulls said it was his. I haven't seen any proof that he took the video other than the fact he has a tent of the same color. But assuming he took it, show us why it is a fake. It is better than anything else I've seen short the PG film. Happy hunting...

Here is FB/FB's breakdown of the camper video:


Camper video enhanced:

226 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. So do I!!! He makes perfect sense and presents his discussion in an intelligent and logical manner.

      Delete
    2. Cyndi = Dick Ryder.

      Too easy to figure out.

      Delete
    3. I must be Rick Dyer also! I agree with Cyndi or Rick Dyer.

      Delete
    4. Hey Anonymous dude - I am Cyndi and I am most certainly NOT Dick Ryder or Rick Dyer. Bob C. makes a lot of sense and presents reasonable questions. It's that simple.

      Delete
    5. Yeaaa riggghhhhttt,Cyndi. ;)

      Delete
    6. Skin color is all wrong and the forehead is way too big. But maybe its real. Who knows cause a video doesn't prove the whole case. But we all know if your videos hot on YouTube you make a lot of money. Reason enough for all youtube videos to be fake.

      Delete
    7. I agree instead of just sitting in front of your computer typing quickly how its fake, how this guy or that guy is a jerk I want them to prove WHY ITS FAKE. Not just throw a comment out there from the safety of their darken room. I dont know if a video or picture is real.

      Delete
  2. Tent camper, seems to turn it's neck more degrees, then Patty, who is on the alert? Just saying. Also nobody's name with the video at release.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed on the neck flexibility. I believe Bill Munns wrote something about the fact that Patty turns more like a gorilla (with her shoulders, not her neck) as opposed to humans, who have much more flexibility in the neck. Don't get that sense in the tent vid.

      Delete
  3. Looks pretty damn good to me. I agree with Bob C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks more like chewbacca than patty..maybe its a hoaxer in a star wars costume.

      Delete
    2. Still looks like its wearing sunglasses to me.

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. You rock, Chris. Thanks for chiming in here. Completely agree with you (and with Bob C. and Joe Palermo).

      Delete
    2. habituator claimer with zero evidence

      Delete
    3. Chris does not rock, just ask Robert Lindsay.

      Delete
    4. Perhaps you should open your mind and watch his videos.

      Delete
    5. Christopher Noel, just another habituating fraud with ZERO evidence.

      Delete
  5. Do.you really expect the regular morans who frequent this page to give an eduacted answer to.this question. All these dudes are intersted in are taterholes and pooping in.jars..

    From what i have read about this video and heard rick dyer openly admitted he was involved in this filming so its not a guess.or rumor due to similar facts the people who put.out this video.openly give thanks.to bigfoottrackersllc on their website shootingsasquatch.com. which you will find the camper video.on.their website.


    But other than rick being involved nobody has actually provided solid.proof.its a fake this could be a real life case of the boy who cried wolf on this one. The video always looked real to me and from what inunderstand shootingsasquatch.com and bigfoottracker llc all claim there is much more to this video that they are not sharing witjout a press conference which smells.an awful like the freezer incident so that throws up red flags but other than that there is no other real proof then peoples opinions about.rick dyer

    If.its a hoax its a damn good one but how.could rick top the freezer hoax

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "But other than rick being involved nobody has actually provided solid.proof.its a fake"

      ummmmm that would be the proof

      Delete
    2. "Do.you really expect the regular morans who frequent this page"

      This is really rich coming from the only "moran" I've ever seen who can't even use a space bar properly, spamming the blog all day.long.withhis.retarded.postings

      Delete
    3. Anonb1:17 -Well judging by how offended you got then you must be one of the taterhole jar pooping idiots who come here to talk about nothing.which is exactly what i was talking about and ive explained this 20 times already that the space key is way too small on samsung galaxy note

      Delete
    4. yeah believe me we've all heard the story 20 times. who fucking cares? you're the only moron i see on the internet with that problem so it's clearly user incompetence. go look for some more baby bigfoots.

      Delete
    5. ever see old red eyes out there,you by greenwood lake?

      Delete
  6. I have also heard people mention seeing a baby on its left shoulder and until today i never saw it but if you look close you can almost see an infant hanging.on.its left shoulder which is exactly where.you see the infant on the hoffman video. If that is a baby then im.going with 100% real u cant fake that but i.could be wrong about.seeing the infant i wanna see this other footage they claim.to.have

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ you and that choad guy should throw your galaxy note phones in the damn trash

      Delete
    2. I am the knower eats squatch chode. I changed the name allot.of.people.were saying I'm a hypocrite or a child because of my name so I changed it... and.I love the galaxy not I just hate this keyboard and the one the phone.comes.with has an even smaller space key

      Delete
    3. well if you listened to the people who told you to change your name, I hope you also listen to the guy telling you to throw your phone in the trash

      Delete
    4. Hell no the galaxy note is by far the best cell phone on the market as a matter of fact this is the exact phone used to film the camper tent video. Let me guess you like the iPhone??

      Delete
    5. No, I like the Poop in a jar Phone.

      Delete
    6. i doubt you could figure out how to use an iphone either

      Delete
    7. Oh dear lord, chose boy sees a baby on Hoffman and the tent video. Oh boy........

      Delete
    8. The baby in the hoffman video is clear as. Day and im not the only person who sees it

      Delete
    9. Yeah and you're also not the only looney toon either....

      Delete
    10. Wow all you skeptics can do is throw insults that's about it you can't even properly argue your own case all you can do is call us looney and then talk about your own poop and taterholes. Seriously leave your moms basement maybe go get laid or something. You must have a sad life if for fun you go to a Bigfoot forum and talk down to people who beleive

      Delete
    11. This is a blog's open comment section, not a true forum. Instead of bitching, you should join the forum and start a thread about Bob c's post.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. Easier. Bigfoots exist. This however I'm afraid is most likely yet another fake, the whole forehead looks like a mask for one thing. All these crap videos that people are analyzing lately are only there to waste our time, this is like brain dead TV entertainment designed to occupy the public and keep them from asking questions. We're sheep in the masses only way to control is to get enough people thinking and operating in similar fashion.

      Delete
    2. Not in the middle of the city, in your air condistion, heated den.

      Delete
  8. I can hardly claim any sort of super strong credentials for this, but I will watch it and study it a bit more and try to give a semi-reasonable breakdown of it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. so which is footers...

    bigfoot is highly elusive OR bigfoot likes to chill 2 meters from peoples tents?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In.my honest opinion.i beleive that like.other nocturnal.animals.who.show themselves during the day i beleive these sasquatch may have a form of rabis or an.illness most nocturnal animals dont.come.out.in the day inless they are.ill

      Delete
    2. classic footer excuse^

      ok lets entertain that idea for a second... then it would be easy to track/photo/film/run over/trap/kill one of these "ill" ones surely?

      or do they get their magic powers back as soon as someone with a camera goes within 100 meters of it?

      Delete
    3. The answer, 12:03, is "both". Human beings have created havoc on the planet, killing way more than is necessary for survival. Humans kill for fun, which makes them a danger to all other living beings. Of course Bigfoot would remain elusive, with us knuckleheads around. But BF are also extremely intelligent and curious. If there is no obvious threat presented by a particular individual human being, and if a BF hasn't been traumatized by the actions of an armed human in his or her own personal past, that BF might very well approach a camp fire, to see what's going on, either just to satisfy his or her curiosity, or to monitor the actions of the camp occupants, for the good of the rest of that BF's family or clan or whatever.

      All you have to do is read or listen to the reports, and you can see this is true. It's true that BF avoid people sometimes, and not other times. Surely you, in your life, have approached certain people with enthusiasm and/or curiosity, and given others a wide berth. Why would a BF -- a creature reported to be, at worst, as smart as an ape, and at best, way smarter than a human -- be any different?

      Delete
  10. But in reality you can never truely prove 100% its a hoax unless they admit it. Like people to this day try and prove the pg film was a hoax but unless gimlin comes out and says hey gotcha or roger patterson communicates from beyond nobody.will ever truely prove it. Too much.time.is wasted proving hoaxes its just about much of a waste as doing a.hoax if we could just focus more on finding the.evidence that will be time.better.spent

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cant prove a negative so the default rational explanation for the pgf is man in a suit, like it or not, that is what it is.

      Delete
    2. Only because you're likely thinking like an arrogant sheep, just because the majority lives one way doesn't mean it's right or the only way.
      Enough has already been proven supporting the pgf as no costume we can't reproduce it for one thing which ought to be very simple were it fake, but any bf horror flick shows just how impossible it really is.

      Delete
    3. "cant prove a negative so the default rational explanation for the pgf is man in a suit, like it or not, that is what it is."

      You're correct, but currently in bigfootery, the default rational explanation has been twisted into every video/pic is real unless you can prove otherwise.

      Delete
    4. Mr 12:16 can't prove a negative/man in suit:

      Newsflash Sherlock:

      Suits don't have muscles.

      God how dense can the naysayers get?

      Delete
    5. I in now way think the pg film is a suit it is just not possible for any man to be porportioned that way and fill a suit and move that way expecially with shoulder pads and being stuffed with pillows lol it would be impossible to move that way. Also in another break down I've seen shows patty toes moving. Oh and the pendulous breasts nobody has bothered to explain how they could have faked those titties or why they would decide to give it boobs and also make.them.real. I guess they did.it.to add more impossible to the already impossible. Or maybe roger just liked big hairy titties. Patty is as real as can be and when we say it watch how The skeptics get offended and their only.defense at that point is to insult us with middle school name calling.. patty is real!!!!

      Delete
    6. Patty's a farce. Its jerry Romney in a suit. RP was on ANE's payroll. The suit scrunches at both hips, no simians have hairy ass titties, the ass never flexes when walking and that is impossible for a biped. You can see the ass section shift though near the infamous frame where Jerry turns.

      Biggest farce ever. Not in the least convincing.

      Delete
    7. So now jerry romney wore the patty suit?.thought bob h swore he wore it?.damn how many dudes fit in that one suit? Oh thats right none cause she is a real sasquatch

      Delete
    8. You got to get off this Romney kick 6:07. It was not him. He said as much, and he is not lying to protect a defunct low-budget film company. Reinke probably threw his name out there because he had good reason to believe the film was hoaxed(it was) and Romney was, in his view, the most obvious suit candidate.

      Bob and Patricia: cut the bullshit and provide the true details of this great story. Roger would have wanted it that way; at some point he would have taken a bow. After all he was a showman.

      Delete
    9. my sons hulk costume has muscles

      Delete
  11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96_QuUkp1MY&feature=plcp

    Check this out!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So Dick got a replacement for me.
      I'm so sad. ; )

      Delete
  12. Side by side, Camper Bigfoot and Patty look like they'd make a handsome couple. Imagine hearing squatch howls in the woods, following the sound and seeing those two pumping and sweating! Pedulous titties and wood knocking and the whole nine yards, am I right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol patty would actually be old as fuck by now

      Delete
  13. Looks like an aboriginal from Aussie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like crappy CGI, let's see a full body view and they might have something but no one's going to dare do that when it'll reveal the hoax by the movements. Best and only way to determine videos is subject movement, now ask yourselves why every crap clip that comes along is like 4 seconds long and usually behind other objects. LOL

      Delete
    2. CGI is.not possible when you have something such as that screen between the camera and the sasquatch

      Delete
    3. It is an abo for sure, check out the long hair on the back of the head. This video was filmed in Australia.

      Delete
  14. We are obligated by the tenets of basic inquiry and even common sense to consider the source of a video when no supporting physical evidence is available. The degree of authenticity of a video like this rests solely on the credibility of those involved in shooting it because there is no 'proof' that can be extrapolated from a video. For me, the inquiry begins and ends at the mention of Rick Dyer's name because you'd have to extend credibility to him that he has not earned and most certainly does not deserves. In fact, his reputation is so tainted it reduces the credibility of those who would suggest we overlook his involvement in any piece of evidence, whether it be video or physical. IMHO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Whatever credibility FB/FB had was obliterated when they endorsed this video without addressing the problems with its source.

      Delete
  15. Replies
    1. Sounds like people are envious of Dier eg.TTBF,Bigfoot Evidence

      Delete
    2. Sounds like you're one big taterhole.

      Delete
  16. Dick Ryder. There's your proof of it not being Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete

  17. It's a curiosity so it goes in the curiosity box, next, with provenance please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nicely put. We can play "it comes from a hoaxer, lets find the tell" for fun, but regardless of outcome the video is worthless. Backstory or provenance is very important, even more so with a vid of this low quality.

      Delete
  18. whoo hooo, dun get the boat over tha'r boy! we got us a gater.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The movement and facial structure looks much more like a real animal than a mask. I'm particularly struck by the massiveness and shape of the head at the back and sides. (and what looks like a huge moustache!)

    Thanks for the article and the enhanced video. It's unfortunate that the bigfoot community is so polarized, but someday after this animal is officially discovered I'm pretty sure videos like this will be re-evaluated by more cool heads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Come the day when this creature is authenticated in the mad populaces eye. It will still be denied by many. This is going to be a huge paradigm shift for EVERYBODY. The fact that a bipedal animal four times bigger than us is out there is truly a game changer, even for a believer like me. There have been times when I have been at certain locations and simply have not wanted to exit my vehicle. Come the day of confirmation I may have no desire to go at all. Because at the end of the day what business do I have potentially threatening this creature and it's family. They command and demand respect. Mid Michigan calling

      Delete
    2. except, that it isn't real, you are gonna die old and embittered that your little fairy tale is just a lie. You've been swindled by conmen.

      Delete
    3. So, on the day of confirmation the bigfoots are gonna get pissed that the jig is up and start ripping limbs off people? Cool.

      Delete
    4. Come the day of scientific confirmation this will no longer be the realm of cryptids but the world of anthropologists and all the finance and resources that this science has to offer. No longer will it be taboo for science to discuss and investigate. Studying these creatures should be a real challenge because this animal usually wants nothing to do with us and who can blame them. We are stinky dangerous animals who like to kill first then study later.

      Yeah I am getting old and I may be gone before all the above transpires. But I know my experience with this animal was real. I am more of a sceptic than most of you of what I see on the Internet.

      If you live in mid Michigan and you want to go lookin for "evidence" there are many places to go. The Rifle river from Omer west to melita Rd. is very quiet and full of food and cover. Look for stick structures or stacked rocks. I know people who have been canoeing on the river and have seen what looked like gorillas watching people on the river. At the northern most parts of the rifle river is the best. The locals say they have there very own Bigfoot up there. Huron national forest is huge and not many people around. Glad win and midland county's regularly have reported sightings, but be very careful. Wild pigs are around so be prepaired.

      Take a gps, a HD stabilized camera and a lot of patience to start with. Don't go alone because the more the merrier. Who knows, you might find something and there is nothing better than a witness. So get out there and good luck

      Mid Michigan calling

      Delete
  20. Don't know if that is a 'squatch or not, but if it is, then one of the Oak Ridge Boys grandpa has some explaining to do....

    ReplyDelete
  21. Replies
    1. Do you get a ring around the taterhole if you keep pooping in jars?

      Delete
  22. "Can Someone Prove To Me The Tent/Camper Video Is Fake?"

    The headline alone is a complete failure and a perfect example of the anti-scientific mindset so prevalent among the footers. No, YOU prove that it's a BIGFOOT. That's the way it's supposed to work. It's not up to someone else to prove the negative when YOU are making the EXTRAORDINARY CLAIM.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We cannot prove Rick Dyers video is fake Bob C, so you can get off the fence now.

      Delete
  23. Sounds like people are envious of Dier eg.TTBF,Bigfoot Evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Here is the complete analysis video by FBFB. They rate Camper/Tent video at #2 of all time.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ_lbVCVd48&feature=plcp

    ReplyDelete
  25. Rick has nobody to blame but himself not Shawn or anyone on TT or any other Bigfoot research group.
    The 2008 freezer hoax interview.
    Interviewer:" Did you ever intend to put this across as the real deal"
    Rick Dyer:"No sir it's Bigfoot,Bigfoot don't exist"

    Dyer cost people money with this little "joke" and still makes money from hoaxing and continues to run his mouth about everyone else.
    When someone makes any kind of claim Rick has to try to get his 2 cents in and make it about him.

    The tent video may look good but if people are skeptical about it I can't blame them Dyer is a proven admitted hoaxer and likes to flaunt it.

    It is true in some cases that you shouldn't judge the object in the video on who is holding the camera or is associated with it but in Dyer's case how can you not?
    After all "It's Bigfoot Bigfoot don't exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems to me if you admit it you get bashed more. But if you don't your ok."Kulls,TTBF and all the others

      Delete
  26. I have to agree the video is compelling . It isn't CGI so it's either a man in a good costume or a real bigfoot. The problem many people have is that it's coming from Dyer and the mention of his name is enough to discount anything to many people. Imagine if we had the internet back in the 60's ? Patterson didn't exactly have the best reputation either and the guy who claimed to be the one in the suit has passed a lie detector test which Gimlin has still not taken to my knowledge. There is a chance that both Patterson and Dyer got lucky and filmed a real bigfoot or they could have fooled us . The Patterson film does look real and you can even see muscle movement and for that time if it was a costume it was well done. Too bad they didn't go outside and do a better investigation like have someone stand next to that tree and film from the same position to show proportion. There are too many BS'ers in the bigfoot investigation field who make the rest look bad. Even though I wish this video was real Dyer's reputation will always cast doubt on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is suposedly much more to this video that they arent showing till they get a press conference. Suposedly they have footage if this sasquatch eating walking a.rumning. the fact that he wont show it without a press conderence smells just like the freezer hoax. But then again we have all heard the boy who cried wolf. Could dyer be the boy who cried sasquatch? I mean he does go on real bigfoot expwditions. And at the time.this.was filmed he was on a tour of a binch of states squatching.... the video looks goodbi.wanna see the rest

      Delete
    2. "Too bad they didn't go outside and do a better investigation like have someone stand next to that tree and film from the same position to show proportion."

      Hmmm so take a guess why they didn't do that.

      Delete
  27. See what one get's when one posts a some what educated post! A bunch of anonymous a-holes posting crap about it. Nicely done post asking a good question, "prove it is NOT real." Bet those posting negative comments have never set foot in a forest let alone searched for anything other than where to wipe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Bet those posting negative comments have never set foot in a forest let alone searched for anything other than where to wipe."


      Just like you did you giant taterhole.

      Delete
    2. -Nicely done post asking a good question, "prove it is NOT real."-

      It's a stupid question because it presumes the logical fallacy that if someone can't prove it's a hoax, then it must be a real Bigfoot.

      Delete
  28. Finally someone wants to take the video on its merits. I cant believe some peoples deceit in saying such lies as "it was proved 1000%fake". People who say such things are hoaxers and should be treated as such.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "it was proved 1000%fake" Was on this TTBF blog(Bigfoot Evidence)Last week.. But now to many people are saying it's real!
      Tell Us again 1000% fake, You can't and never could. This blog is full of TTBF shit!

      Delete
    2. The source of the video is an inextricably important component of its potential authenticity. Ignoring it will get you nowhere.

      Delete
    3. In my opinion I think for ttbf so say 1000% or even just 100% fake you would need some sort of a confession from the source. That's a pretty bold statement from ttbf

      Delete
  29. This looks like the real deal, folks.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I think this video is real. I don't care if Dyer was involved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Step away from the computer and put down the crack pipe.

      Delete
    2. You haven't disputed one lately,robert

      Delete
  31. I hear the brush a-poppin in shit. Must be real cause the looney toons over at bff are circle jerking again.

    It's impossible for a Patty suit to exist, they say.

    But it's possible for bigfoot to exist in the face of zero accepted evidence.

    So sayeth sweety and the rest of the delusioned.

    Btw 15 pounds of taters were on sale for three bucks. Today it was a good day.

    ReplyDelete
  32. An old dude with a mustache taking a piss near the campsite? lol

    ReplyDelete
  33. Albert Ostman's opinion would be highly valued right now.
    Dave

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Albert Ostman's taterhole was highly valued by Bigfoot

      Delete
  34. Thanks for the Post Bob I do agree with a lot of the points you've made.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Rick Dyer is a hoaxer and a liar, plain and simple.I don't find the video compelling at all.
    Why was it put on YouTube sideways? Why in black and white? There was a rifle in the tent, why not shoot?
    There are enough red flags for me so I feel comfortable calling this a fake/hoax.
    By the way. If you find a "researcher" or his/her evidence questionable, what makes you think they are actually looking for Bigfoot? These people are legit or hoaxers, it can't work both ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Show me that it is a fake. That is all I have asked. I think the video was tossed out without being analized just because Dyer was likely involved in getting the footage. Am I wrong?

      Delete
    2. Look at your taterhole and you will get the answer you seek.

      Delete
    3. I cant agree with you more bob c when this first came out.i remember seeing everyine in the bf community saying.its fake.jus becasue dyer is involved but that was the only reason why its fake. We have all heard the boy who cried wolf and in.this case dyer may have cried sasquatch this video looks real to me. It almost apears to have an infant on its left shouser as well and im.not the only person.who thoughr so as well

      Delete
    4. "Show me that it is a fake."

      What kind of a loaded challenge is this? What will satisfy you as evidence that this is a hoax, if the fact that Dyer is involved isn't enough for you? Are you waiting for a "Behind-the-Scenes Making Of Special"? I don't think that's coming, so the conclusion is it must be real then? The logic is appalling.

      Delete
    5. Bob C. You ARE a walking talking logical fallacy. Burden of proof lies with those well known and well documented hoaxers making extraordinary claims.

      Your type of mindset is what "cripples" the land of the foot.


      Its overrun with nimrods. It stands NO chance.

      Delete
    6. Dude, pull your head out of your ass. I think Holywood would have a tough time creating this video. You have closed your mind off and wouldn't believe it no matter what. Fine by me, but do you really think Dyer has the ability to hoax something this well? I think not. Duplicate the video. Anyone who thinks it's a fake..Duplicate

      Delete
    7. Once again bob c couldnt agree.more i.mean.look.at the freezer.hoax. he turned over a gorilla suit.filled.with possom guts lol not very bright the only reason it got so much attention.was because he had the "body" for quite some time he kept a black bag over so all the videos he.posted about it nwver showed the actual body. He let one.picture of it and that picture alone should have been enough to say hoax it looked rediculous. Thia guy just isnt bright enough to fake this video in my opinion

      Delete
    8. The truth hurts Bob C.......you'd never cut it in the real scientific realm.


      Prove to everyone its real.....The burden of proof lies with those making extraordinary claims and in this case its a well known and documented hoaxer.

      Your head is so far up your ass that you've become OK with presenting logical fallacies as some sort of vindication for the case of Sasquatch.

      I can only pray that you're not part of our nations educational system.

      Enough said....

      Delete
    9. We cannot spot the tell Bob C. Hence, it does not matter that its vague and submitted by youtube entertainer Rick Dyer. Get off the fence man! This is it!!

      Delete
    10. Again... well said Bob C. Thank you for your candid and succinct thoughts!

      Delete
    11. It's become clear in the comments section that Bob C. claiming he's "on the fence" about this video is the biggest hoax of all. He's obviously a fanatical believer, who will never allow it to be disproven to his satisfaction.

      Delete
    12. come on,you've obviously seen the halloween costume that looks EXACTLY like this bigfoot,don't be such a rube

      Delete
  36. All I can give is my opinion, Bob C. I dismiss this video as being a real Bigfoot because I don't find it compelling. The deal-breaker for me are the eyes which provide shade beyond the shape of the eye sockets, meaning the dark shadow extends into the sunlight, past the point where any part of the body can block out light.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SasquaiNation is commenting on his on blog!

      Very Sad!

      Delete
  37. My thoughts

    Cons: 1. Creature Profile. I have a hard time making out the profile of this alleged bigfoot, and from an artist's standpoint, this would be the most difficult to fake. Bigfoots have a sloping forehead and a cone shaped head - this would be very difficult to fake with a human in a costume.
    2. Cameraman - Who was he? Was it Rick Dyer? If not, was it someone else? Why aren't there more details on who filmed this? I understand that some bigfoot experiencers wish to remain anonymous for valid reasons, but knowing who took the video and the circumstances around is a very important piece of the puzzle that would explain ...
    3. Why was a Bigfoot this close in broad daylight? Bigfoots are hard to capture on film because they are nocturnal, illusive, stealthy, and fast! They're like giant Ape ninjas that can outrun us and outmaneuver us and don't want to be near us! That's why it's so difficult to get good footage - so how was this guy able to pull it off? A Fluke? I don't think so.

    Pros

    1. Facial dimensions. Again from an artist's standpoint, the dimensions are vary similar to Patty's in the side-by-side. Not the ratio of eyes, to nose, to cheekbones, to ears. Very similar.
    2. Neck. Someone earlier mentioned that the bigfoot turns its head and shouldn't be able to. I disagree. These creatures would have some lateral mobility but would need to turn its body to make a full 90 degree head spin--and the creature does turn its body! Watch the video again if you missed it! Also the trapezius muscle is inhuman and in accordance to bigfoot descriptions and videos. This would be very difficult to replicate in a costume and would most likely require a cumbersome prosthetic.
    3. The ear. Patty's ear is very difficult to discern. Side-by-side, her ear is a lot more clear. To me, a clearer video of a squatch would make the Patty video even more discernible as the viewer becomes more familiar with squatch features. The ear is in the same general area and the same general shape. Again, non-artists may think this is no big deal, but ears are difficult to get right.

    Consulsions (plural for FB/FB) - Those of you who say this is definitively real or fake lose all credibility in my estimation--I agree with the guest blogger--Bob C is correct! Those of you who hate on FB/FB and continue to post your smug, easy skepticism reek of intellectual insecurity. If a video is obviously fake, why post about it unless you are in need of some odd negative validation? FB/FB may not be right all the time--they may not be right about their squatch origins theory--but they have the intellectual honesty to be true to their beliefs and to move forward despite the multitude of whiney negative skeptics out there.

    Personally, I am leaning toward this video being real. Rick Dyer may have a similar tent. He may have even tried to take credit for this video--but if he's a liar then maybe he's jumping on the opportunity here since he has a similar tent! Maybe he did take the video and it is a real squatch. The boy who cried wolf did get attacked by a wolf eventually and Dyer has been out in bigfoot territory. Enough about Dyer. This footage looks very compelling. Like the Patty film, it's either real, or an extremely good hoax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correction: "Note" the ratio of the eys, to nose ...

      Delete
    2. Great points i.totally agree.

      Also what ive said before i think these sasquatch that are out during the day are rabid or poaaibly ill..... most nocturnal animals out during the day are rabid or ill... why couldnt that be for a sasquatch as well.... just a thought

      Delete
    3. Good points all, and well stated.

      Delete
    4. Sorry folks its dyers video and he gets the credit!

      Delete
    5. we're selling bridges in Brooklyn,can I put you guys down for one?

      Delete
    6. *Troll trolls by and looks around - sees nobody has shat on this comment yet. Shats on said comment*

      Delete
  38. The big problem with this video is that it looks a little too good to be real. This is the first close up of a "bigfoot's" face ever shot, as far as i know, so obviously (if it is real) it's going to lack a proper point of reference for the viewer. What do we compare it to? How can we say it's real, if what we're seeing is fantastical and unlike anything else? It was shot on an iPhone, it's not like we're seeing it in the flesh. It just looks a big hairy man, which we're told don't exist in science. The truth is, this could have been faked, and Dyer's name anywhere near it is more than enough to sway some people.
    That said, i agree with you that no one has offered any irrefutable evidence that this is faked. To me, though, it looks a little too good to be true. It's a red flag, but i just don't know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "That said, i agree with you that no one has offered any irrefutable evidence that this is faked."

      Please provide an example of what could qualify as irrefutable evidence that this is faked. Seriously, what sort of evidence would satisfy this requirement in your mind?

      Delete
    2. well,the bigfoot in the picture is a good start to proving its fake.

      Delete
  39. "Habituators have damn interesting evidence"


    I stopped reading there as this guy isn't worth the time. That was truly one of the biggest OXYMORONS I have EVER heard, period.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I always scroll down the comments section so I can see the two chicks in bikinis...you know the photo, one normal looking and the other that is 90 ft tall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do too. I'm ashamed but yet curious.What would that be like? Would she be gentle? MOMMY!!!!!

      Delete
    2. Its an average size girl and a midget.

      Delete
    3. I love the small one smelling the others taint

      Delete
  41. SILENCE!!!! Did even one of you'all dirt-eatin' fucktards take into account the BF is sporting a raging mullet? I mean full blown Kentucky waterfall! Could this point to something far greater than all of of your dim little views put together? Could Rick Dyer come up with this on his own and could he afford that level of movie mask craftsmanship? Take 10 mins. quiet time and then post your thoughts.I have spoken...

    ReplyDelete
  42. What's with all the Bobs in bigfootery?

    Bob C, Bob H, Bob G. Bigfoot Bob

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. is that why bigfoot hides,is he ashamed of his mullet?

      Delete
  43. PROOF:

    RICK DYER

    TEAM TAZER

    PORN REDIRECT

    There's your proof it's fake.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I am new to all this and I can honestly say that when that creature looked into the camera, it made the hairs on my neck stand up. Chilling.

    No Hollywood special effects group can do that with a billion dollar budget.

    Something is among us and it isnt Santa Claus. Again, chilling.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I recommend Dr. Jeff Meldrum's book on Sasquatch published in 2006. He compiled a lot of evidence and critiqued it. It's the most serious, comprehensive review of the physical evidence I've been able to find to date. I'm going to order Bindernagle's 2010 book next.

    ReplyDelete
  46. It could be that the male bf have slight differences
    in features in male and female.Also patty is thought to be a female hence the softer features.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. maybe male bigfoots have big titties

      Delete
    2. Can anyone prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that male bigfoots don't have big titties?

      Delete
    3. see how that argument can turn stupid real fast?

      Delete
  47. Two words: Dickie is a KNOWN HOAXER. I can't prove to you that my uncle Ray stole my Sudafed when he was here last week, but he's he only meth-head with access to my belongings. -- d3w177

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was me, but Ray told me where you live and I climbed through a window while Ray created a diversion(remember when everyone went nuts looking for the clicker Sunday night? Ray was the one who put on Finding Bigfoot and then hid the clicker under your easy chair).

      Delete
    2. Sorry, but I don't get animal planet as part of my cable package. Apparently it's more important that I have at least four Fox "News" stations.

      Delete
  48. Is it just me or does the Bigfoot look just like Paul teutul sr From orange county choppers!!!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Until I started reading comments on these boards, I never truely understood the term "pearls before swine." Now, I do. Excellent and articulate post Bob C... you stated many of my beliefs better than I ever have. The haters and asstrolls continue to amaze me with their childish attacks on anyone who tries, as you have, to use logic and a curious mind to analyze the proffered evidence. What I have found to be a boon are the smaller groups that are moderated by someone with some wisdom... such as wildlife biologist Melody Fowler-Knowles. Send her a private message and mention my name, and she will hook you up. I would like to hear more of your thoughts, as would the members of our groups. I Look foward to chatting with you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see at least 8 well-presented, civil skeptical counterpoints in the comments that have gone completely unanswered, as usual. The people who complain the most about the "trolls" on here seem to spend the greater amount of their time stirring them up, and the lesser amount of time responding to the intelligent conversation they claim to desire. Or is it that anybody who happens to disagree with you is automatically filed in the "troll" category? I suspect that's a lot closer to the truth.

      Delete
    2. Yes Bob C...join our group,the Bigfoot Circle Jerkers,mmmmmmmm,so serious,seriously.

      Delete
    3. A pearl necklace,you swine

      Delete
    4. Come bob c...I profer my asstroll evidence to you,take my hand and journey into the rainbow woods with me in search of bigfoot.see ya hater trolls,bob c and I are free now,we no longer need our earthly garments

      Delete
  50. Does Dave Lame really consider his dumbass comments pearls?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt they are not pearls,swine.

      Delete
    2. Dave - trolls were neglected as kids and spend their adult lives trolling forums and threads looking for negative attention. The best thing to do is to join their parents and ignore them.

      Delete
  51. FBFB is completely full of shit just like Bob C & Christopher Noel. 2 complete fuctards!

    ReplyDelete
  52. America,where I am as free to "troll" as others are to spout bigfoot nonsense and get upset when people call bullshit on them.God Bless America and our indigenous Bigfoot population.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahaha Lmfao! Indigenous bigfoot population.....hahaha

      Delete
  53. It's balding trucker with poorly trimmed mustache, spray tan and special effects back hair. Oh, and small sunglasses to hide the area around the eyes that they could not spray tan.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Watch the video again. Watch closely when the "bigfoot" turns and looks at the person in the tent.

    Look at the outline of the tree. It actually distorts and moves with the "bigfoot".

    I think it's safe to say that the video is completely fake.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I can't dismiss the video as a fake and I think it is quite interesting. However, the circumstances around the video are suspect, which does make the video itself suspect no matter how hard someone tries to separate the two.

    Rather than challenging people who had nothing to do with the video to "scrutinize" it, I think it's much more appropriate to ask the person(s) that shot the video to come forward and support it. That is where the true burden should lie.

    I'd like to believe the video is real but the silence of those who created the video is deafening and damning.

    ReplyDelete
  56. A few weeks before the party said the girl's birthday we were going to youth club on Saturday night and the theme was horror. Clearly say the details similar to day, go out with, time and locale for the event. There are two locations in Fort Wayne that would be thrilled to host your child's birthday
    party.

    Also visit my web-site :: 10th Birthday party ideas

    ReplyDelete
  57. It is particularly helpful as you fight off this yeast infection in mouth.

    Are you looking to get rid of troublesome yeast
    infections. Thick, white discharge from the penis.


    Here is my site; how to cure a yeast infection at home

    ReplyDelete
  58. When you stop PPC, traffic dies immediately and your business is dead in the water.

    First a website has to be found, and such a task
    is often difficult when you consider the fact "each website is competing against millions of others for Top Placement in Search Engines. I recommend this online marketing formula to beginner's.

    Also visit my blog Internet Marketing Techniques

    ReplyDelete
  59. In other words, they go against the grain of the careers
    their parents had. Brazenhead is a great place to go with your
    family or for a business lunch or dinner, but if you are looking for
    a party atmosphere, this isn't it. The buccal cavity is a small cavity that has neither jaws nor teeth.

    Here is my webpage - pub quiz answers and questions
    my web page > pub quiz team names

    ReplyDelete
  60. This is because they have a high number of satisfied clients
    who have purchased likes and fans in bulk and are reaping the immense benefits.

    A lot of organizations do not recognize Facebook, so it could be a enormous benefit to you if you
    construct a sizable fan-page and have thousands of followers.
    It gives you info such as fan interaction and visitor demographics but it
    is limited and can't provide info on sources of traffic, keyword data and other sophisticated data.

    Feel free to surf to my website; get facebook fans

    ReplyDelete
  61. You can make your weddings in Delhi a success by trust tasks
    to your love ones. (Here's the key difference. With the advantages that technology is affording for us now planning that special day is a lot easier and simpler.

    My web page :: wedding website advertising

    ReplyDelete