Photo of The Day: Dog with broken neck found buried under logs [Possible Bigfoot Kill]


The photo above was posted by Jeff Y. on the Facebook group, "North American Bigfooters: Research and Bigfoot Sightings". According to Jeff, this poor german shepherd was found buried under some logs over Memorial day weekend. Lately, this area has been a hotspot for Sasquatch activity and the most recent were some hand prints of a baby Sasquatch found the near campsite.

"There were other signs that the campers had problems. We have 2 small hand prints from different times in this area that points to a baby Sasquatch in the area. The dog probably got too close to it," Jeff said.

Jeff posted this message about the area:

Michael L J. found this next to our campsite buried under a few logs about 75 yards from our Central Colorado camp this week. We really do mean it when we say Sasquatches do not like dogs. Here is the sad reality of what happened to this poor chap over Memorial day weekend. There were other signs that the campers had problems. We have 2 small hand prints from different times in this area that points to a baby Sasquatch in the area. The dog probably got too close to it. Michael said it's neck was broken.

[via www.facebook.com]

Comments

  1. I find it hard to believe that wild animal would kill a dog and not eat it..... at least parts of it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find it hard to believe you aren't the same troll

      Delete
    2. Anon 10:18,

      The only troll I see here is YOU. The guy posted an opinion on the topic and low and just because you (OBVIOUSLY a believer that anything and everything posted here is 110% undeniable proof of Sasquatch) don't agree you get all butthurt and regurgitate the same lame ass comment over and over. Get a grip on life, loser and true troll.

      Delete
    3. Theres a theory that sasquai dont view cattle as a source of food because they are the property of humans. Maybe the same goes for dogs. Also, maybe they have plenty of food in the area. There are any number of theoretical explanations.

      Delete
    4. @10:18 so what's the deal with you? why the piss do you bother getting up everyday and tring to be the biggest a-hole you can on a constant basis! people like you need to be tied to a tree and kicked in the mouth as many time as possible. what did your mommy put a porn blocker on their comp? and you now visit this place and spread your hatred to good people with an opinion about a dead dog. it's to bad that you weren't under those f-ing logs bitch ass troll punk fag. just die already homo!

      Delete
    5. Why would sasquatches when they're primal people and not animals take and eat a dog. Makes good sense to leave it there, it even looks like an accident.

      Delete
    6. Some animals kill for fun. Take the mongoose, they kill snakes just for the hell of it. And also cats do it too.

      Delete
  2. Nothing like jumping to conclusions. I mean if a dogs neck is broken [citation needed] it HAD TO BE a Squatch, man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, although it is still an unusual find.

      Delete
    2. I will agree whole-heartedly, not something you see everyday.

      Delete
    3. Maybe Melba should start a "dog protection from Sasquatch" fund. Shame on Squatch..Bad Squatch..

      Delete
    4. I see few possibilities as to what could have broke a large dogs neck. A vehicle sure. A bear? They dont mention any other signs of a fight, such as puncture wounds. Most likely, a bear would have eaten some of it. A person? Good luck. Squatch is very plausible.

      Delete
    5. What would bury it under branches with out eating it? Car might break the neck, but?

      Delete
    6. Lol a squatch maybe? Lol

      Delete
  3. Unless the Squatch use saws, the branches were cut by humans. Look at the cut on the limb directly above the unfortunate puppy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I mean if it were discovered in a rather remote area then maybe look into it a tad but by the obvious saw cut branches and yellow plastic something nearby it is obvious human frequent the area. Much more believable that people were the culprits. Even if it were in an area not frequented you'd still have to consider a bear being the culprit if its in an area where bears are known to exist. There's just too many possibilities.

      Delete
    2. The cut branches are not fresh cuts ,so they have been there laying around

      Delete
    3. Good eye. Obviously not a remote area.

      Delete
    4. Sasquatches, or the forest tribe as my people call them, are very intelligent and they are taught in the ways of tool making. It is not unlike them to use saws to cut branches. Sad about the dog, but he was probably threatening a young.

      Delete
    5. Anon 10:49,

      Your people are frigging liars. I guess they're just forging steel on a daily basis eh? Yes, I know a primitive type saw could be made from something other than metal but you're not going to get those cutlines from anything less than metal.

      Delete
    6. Not steal but they can make bronze tools. They are very good swordsman. They are really quite smart. I caught one trying to send an e mail on my laptop at my campsite in NorCal.

      Delete
    7. Lol. If they can make saws why not a knife or spear to kill the dog. They just choose to break it's neck?

      Delete
    8. The limbs must of been laying around, they were cut a long time ago. The dog is pretty fresh kill.

      Delete
  4. Poor dog. But this looks like somthing that needs to be looked into.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. do you think michael vick went camping last week or what?

      Delete
  5. Definetely a Sasquatch kill. I can see a midtarsel brake in a footprint next to the dogs head.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "small hand prints from different times in this area that points to a baby Sasquatch in the area."

    Small hand prints, like human sized? Where is that photo?

    Dear researchers,
    Get tracks, bones, or photographs. Otherwise keep your mouth shut; you're embarrassing yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Juvenile sasquatches have feet and handprints the size of human prints. This is common knowledge. Do at least a little research before embarassing yourself, troll.

      Delete
    2. Anon 10:11,

      You're such a dumb ass. He wanted to see the evidence, moron. You're so hyped up and ready to feverishly defend the "Sasquatch exist" fight that you're now as sharp as my penis. Congratulations.

      Delete
    3. You know what does have human sized hands and feet? ... HUMANS... Ever consider that

      Delete
  7. This is sort of like the dead deer Timbergiant found covered similarly with sticks and branches.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bigfoot killed Caylee Anthony. Small handprints were found nearby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your comment is is extremely poor taste.
      Pick something less tragic to incite humor with

      Delete
  9. Was there a oriental restaurant nearby!?

    ReplyDelete
  10. So how did he diagnose the broken neck?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well that's how Sasquatch are "KNOWN AND PROVEN" to kill. So rather than wasting time on a diagnosis, that's what it had to be. Got it, troll?

      Delete
    2. "KNOWN AND PROVEN"

      By which scientific method? As last I looked bigfoot was an urban myth. Please cite the source of 100% proof of this.

      So that's why it had to be.....amazing reasoning!!!

      Delete
    3. That was sarcasm bro. I'm sure the Anons who post: "troll" at every whim were messing their drawers to that one though. It was specifically for the geeks like the second poster in this topic. ;)

      Delete
  11. I think the baby bigfoot should by charged by any animal rights agency willing to do so, on the grounds that it is a humanoid creature that can be protected by law. So why can't it be prosecuted by law? Good luck trying to catch it! :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Actually, sharing knowledge on this blog isn't something healthy, but i will do that again. Anyway, i had read about a Russian researcher (i think the researcher was a lady) who tracked a "creature". The researcher had a dog, and it followed the creature. Guess what? The dog was found as went to two pieces a few days later.

    P.S.: The land you live on belongs to Native Peoples, not whites, afro-americans or someone else. Deal with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With all due respect, maybe the sasquatches came first.

      Delete
  13. How do you know the dog is dead? No sign of decay.

    ReplyDelete
  14. These Bigfoot dreamers are sick individuals going to extreme lengths to prove their fantasy. Now they are killing dogs, laying them under logs and pretending they were killed by a Bigfoot. Sick sick individuals.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I hope someone calls the proper authorities this could be a case of animal cruelty.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It could have just crawled it off and died, for whatever reason. Is it a simple matter tell if the neck was broken? I would think before rigor mortis the dog would be limp like a rag doll.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anyone who concludes a Bigfoot did this is delusional.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. not really. not when they exist

      Delete
    2. Anyone who thinks a bigfoot couldnt have done this is delusional.

      Delete
  18. Bigfoot is a myth, anyone who thinks they saw one is lying, delusional or mistaken. You have had all these years and hundreds if not thousands of people looking for it, and you got nothing. No body, no evidence. Give it up and find another hobby. But then again, most of you retards think UFO's are alien creatures(despite the physics pointing out the massive distances involved in interstellar travel) but it's not like you people have ever let a little something like physics get in the way of your fantasies before......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1st of all, earth has many dense unexplored places anything can be out there, hell...fire breathing dragons might still be out there, my point is there are lots of evidence to support the existence of bigfoot, sure we dont have a body nor dna to inform us about this creatures.
      2nd...your an idiot for being soo narrow minded.

      Delete
  19. If it is dead in the wild it seems to be proof of bigfoot.
    All road kill is not from cars...the poor critters are stomped on by bigfoot when it runs across the road. Let us consider.."baby sasquatch handprints"...where are they? If it is a campsite you would expect human prints...adult and child.
    Evidence of nothing but a poor dead dog.

    new anony

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well now in addition to kidnapping and raping human women, they also kill mans best friend. That in and of itself would justify killing one.

    ReplyDelete
  21. First off it's a sheapard.I shed no tears.A breed developed for it's bad nature. 2nd, the dog is'nt dead, it's not even hurt,it was posed for shits and giggles and it sure seems to be fooling everyone so far.If an angry 500lb. wild forest man got a hold of this piece of shit dog it would look like just that, a piece of shit with blood and eyeballs popping out.I see no trauma evidence.That is all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've had Shepherds for nearly 30 years, and you could not want for a better friend or animal.

      Maybe your experience is being a total cock and treating the dog(s) badly.

      Delete
  22. Somebody killed a dog big deal.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I would love to see a pack of dogs tear Matilda to pieces. Then the Nuge could arrow the infant.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I am Mike J with SIR. The dog photo is real. The dog is deader than a door nail. My guess it was tossed. It's still there I assure you, except the 15 turkey vultures that were circling it on Tuesday I am sure have done a number on it. Others do camp in this area. Allot of the story above is lies. This was posted without our cofounder's permission. We do not manufacture evidence. You can quote me on that. The Sasquatches do not like dogs here. We have found collars and leashes before. I never said baby bigfoot hands were present and I never said its neck was broken either. Get the facts straight.. Please be aware the camp site down the way had huge broken aspens and trees pushed over as well. Anonymous comments mean nothing to me good or bad. This is the biggest problem with the computer, you can hide behind your cowardice. I don't. I see a woman posted her name, I respect that. We have offered Oxford University and the Sykes Study our hair samples, our scat and our hand print.No takers to date. We are different, we put our money where our mouth is... Sincerely, Michael L Johnson-Co founder-Sasquatch Investigations of the Rockies

    ReplyDelete
  25. someone drove out to campsite, dumped their dead dog, covered with branches, left...it was only 75 yards from campsite?

    ReplyDelete
  26. I would have expected injuries and other obvious evidence," said Main. Many times, this saves clients thousands of dollars on legal representation. Unfortunately driving under the influence violations are usually enough for a criminal attorney locate a niche.

    Look into my blog post: Accident Lawyer

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?