Joe Black Agrees: Everyone sees something different
"Infant Bigfoot" on left compared to a squirrel on right - Joe Black |
We don't care what anyone says about Joe Black, one thing we do know about him is that he stands his ground when it comes to his blurry/bobsquatchy videos. In many of his purported Bigfoot films, he's pretty certain that he didn't capture any images of squirrels, raccoon, or shadows. As he admits in his latest post,everyone sees something different and Bigfoot is in the eye of the beholder:
In 2009 I captured a black and white video of what I maintain is a infant Bigfoot. I did exhaustive follow-up on the video. I had the angles and measurements so using some good old-fashioned algebra I was able to accurately determine the size of the subject’s head and the body height. To this day the video still gets hits and is still controversial. The interesting aspect of the video is the diverse range of comments I receive. Almost everyone sees something different. There is no argument something is there, but what is there is the subject of debate.
I of course see an infant Bigfoot, but others claim to see a diverse range of animals and that is the interesting aspect. I have received comments from people who claim to be “Life Long Hunters”, “Expert Woodsmen”, “Wild Life Biologist”, “Forensic Experts”, “spent all my time in the woods”, “Raccoon Hunters”, and of course “Bigfoot Experts”. Most will guess an animal they are familiar with while others seem to just pull something out of the hat and toss it out there, but many of the commenters claim it can not be a Bigfoot because “that is not what they look like”, “everyone knows they don’t exist”, or my favorite one “I do not know what a Bigfoot looks like, but I know that is not it!”.
Even though I have demonstrated the head of the subject to be at least eight inches across commenter after commenter will claim it’s a small rodent which head never grows bigger than two inches.
It appears that people are going to form their opinions regardless of the facts. As the old saying goes, “don’t tell me the facts, that will get in the way of my opinion”. I have found that most people bring their predisposed biases with them and look at everything through that filter. What I see as a Bigfoot others see known animals or if it cannot be explained as a known animal then it must be a hoax.
[via bf-field-journal.blogspot.com]
bigfoot is in the eye of the beholder....until they decide to kidnap us of course. Then there is no doubt :)
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is in the eye of the beer holder.
DeleteLook, it doesn't matter what joeblack thinks, if everyone (or at least almost everyone) can't see it, it's nothing.
You don't have to have an "eye" for bigfoot. Science is not based on opinion, it's based on evidence. Evidence is not something that only one person sees or thinks, it must be supported by the community as a whole.
Joebblack1963 is a jackass..The greatest thing that ever happened to blobsquatchery..Right up there with thesquatchmaterbator
ReplyDeleteOne thing in comman with all these youtubers is they all have killer cribs.
ReplyDeleteThe pic on the left is obviously a infant Bigfoot. Im going to need to see some more pics of this "squirrel" though...
ReplyDeleteLOL...Good one.
DeleteWho's that? It's Secret Squirrel
ReplyDeleteWatch out, we have photographic evidence that squirrels have a severe problem with indecent exposure. That poor deer is still in therapy
ReplyDeleteRocky where is Bullwinkle?
ReplyDeleteBigfoot killed and ate him.Then made me join forces with him to kill deer. I miss my Bullwinkle.
DeleteThe link at the bottom of the post takes you to a page where the ridiculous pareidolia cut out is repeatedly compared to nice clear wildlife photos; its gotta be Phil's doing, he just wont let up.
ReplyDeleteThe title of this article should read: "Joe Black sees Bigfoot in his cereal."
ReplyDeleteEither that or "handsome squirrel"
Delete